Globale Erwärmung durch Treibhauseffekt - nur ein Mythos der Linken? (Seite 3293)
eröffnet am 15.06.06 17:59:51 von
neuester Beitrag 24.04.24 21:20:22 von
neuester Beitrag 24.04.24 21:20:22 von
Beiträge: 57.966
ID: 1.066.312
ID: 1.066.312
Aufrufe heute: 9
Gesamt: 1.505.853
Gesamt: 1.505.853
Aktive User: 0
Top-Diskussionen
| Titel | letzter Beitrag | Aufrufe |
|---|---|---|
| vor 39 Minuten | 3034 | |
| vor 30 Minuten | 2037 | |
| vor 29 Minuten | 1358 | |
| vor 1 Stunde | 1156 | |
| gestern 12:15 | 1114 | |
| vor 58 Minuten | 1089 | |
| vor 1 Stunde | 1030 | |
| vor 36 Minuten | 979 |
Meistdiskutierte Wertpapiere
| Platz | vorher | Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % | Anzahl | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 1. | 18.018,01 | -0,39 | 206 | |||
| 2. | 2. | 10,140 | +5,13 | 140 | |||
| 3. | 3. | 150,76 | -0,53 | 123 | |||
| 4. | 4. | 0,1885 | -2,84 | 76 | |||
| 5. | 13. | 398,20 | -13,73 | 36 | |||
| 6. | 6. | 0,0211 | -32,59 | 34 | |||
| 7. | 5. | 6,7120 | -0,47 | 30 | |||
| 8. | 34. | 0,6850 | -51,07 | 30 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
'Fakegate' - the new nadir of the climate change swindle
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2104908/Fakegate--…
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2104908/Fakegate--…
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 42.793.971 von rv_2011 am 23.02.12 09:46:23Verdrehst du wieder die Fakten,
in den Pages vom 16.1. sind die beiden gefälschten Seiten nicht dabei.
Die Seiten sind am 13.2. gefälscht worden.
One document, titled “Confidential Memo: 2012 Heartland Climate Strategy,” is a total fake apparently intended to defame and discredit The Heartland Institute. It was not written by anyone associated with The Heartland Institute. It does not express Heartland’s goals, plans, or tactics. It contains several obvious and gross misstatements of fact.
in den Pages vom 16.1. sind die beiden gefälschten Seiten nicht dabei.
Die Seiten sind am 13.2. gefälscht worden.
One document, titled “Confidential Memo: 2012 Heartland Climate Strategy,” is a total fake apparently intended to defame and discredit The Heartland Institute. It was not written by anyone associated with The Heartland Institute. It does not express Heartland’s goals, plans, or tactics. It contains several obvious and gross misstatements of fact.
na also, jetzt hat f4z endlich seinen Medienbericht - wird ihm aber wieder nicht gefallen 
Zitat von depodoc: Was hat Gleick denn nachgewiesener Weise gefälscht?Nicht mal deine Lieblingsblogs kennst du.
Er hat in den zugemailten pages nichts gefunden und dann einfach 2 Seiten hinzugedichtet.
Watts hatte doch nachgewiesen, dass das angeblich gefälschte Dokument am 16.1.2012 als pdf generiert wurde, 4 Wochen bevor Gleick die "zugemailten pages" vom Heartland-Institut erhalten hat.
Trading Spotlight
Wenn eine linke Zeitung wie die Independent damit anfängt, kritische Beiträge zum Thema CAGW zu veröffentlichen, dann hat das Ende dieser linken Marotte wirklich begonnen.
Zitat von depodoc: AdHick schrieb am 22.02.12 14:56:01
Beitrag Nr.25011 (42.788.841)
Was hat Gleick denn nachgewiesener Weise gefälscht?
Er hat in den zugemailten pages nichts gefunden und dann einfach 2 Seiten hinzugedichtet.
WUWT
Gleick “impersonated a board member of the Heartland Institute, stole his identity by creating a fake email address, and proceeded to use that fake email address to steal documents that were prepared for a board meeting. He read those documents, concluded that there was no smoking gun in them, and then forged a two-page memo”
Wenn deine von Heartland geschmierte Lieblingsquelle das ohne Nachweis schreibt, wird das zu einem Nachweis?
Man muss sich kneifen.
Weisst du, was ein Richter zu sowas sagen würde?
Solange da nichts nachgewiesen wurde, ist und bleibt deine Aussage justiziabel.
Seitdem Lindzen behauptet hatte, die globale Temperatur würde nicht mehr steigen, ist sie um fast 0,4 Grad gestiegen. Und zwar genau so, wie es mit der anerkannten Theorie des Klimawandels vorhergesagt wurde.
Wie lange will mouse_potato eigentlich noch seine sinnlosen, kindischen Behauptungen wiederholen, die dem unmittelbaren Augenschein widersprechen? Dieser krankhafte Wahn ist doch unbegreiflich.
Wie lange will mouse_potato eigentlich noch seine sinnlosen, kindischen Behauptungen wiederholen, die dem unmittelbaren Augenschein widersprechen? Dieser krankhafte Wahn ist doch unbegreiflich.
Is catastrophic global warming, like the Millenium Bug, a mistake?
At a public meeting in the Commons, the climate scientist Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT made a number of declarations that unsettle the claim that global warming is backed by “settled science”....
...He also said that the IPCC needs “positive feedback mechanisms” to justify anything above a one degree C increase in their predictions. But: “Observation points to small negative feedbacks.”
How to explain the procession of eminent opinion leaders – some even in our own Royal Society – who advance the tenets of catastrophic global warming? “It is science in the service of politics,” he said.
If Lindzen is right, we will never be able to calculate the trillions that have been spent on the advice of “scientists in the service of politics”.
http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2012/02/22/is-catastrophic-gl…
At a public meeting in the Commons, the climate scientist Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT made a number of declarations that unsettle the claim that global warming is backed by “settled science”....
...He also said that the IPCC needs “positive feedback mechanisms” to justify anything above a one degree C increase in their predictions. But: “Observation points to small negative feedbacks.”
How to explain the procession of eminent opinion leaders – some even in our own Royal Society – who advance the tenets of catastrophic global warming? “It is science in the service of politics,” he said.
If Lindzen is right, we will never be able to calculate the trillions that have been spent on the advice of “scientists in the service of politics”.
http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2012/02/22/is-catastrophic-gl…
Fakegate Illustrates Global Warming Alarmists' Deceit and Desperation
There never was a “leaker” in the shameful Fakegate scandal. In the end, there was only a forger, a fraudster and a thief. Alarmist scientist Peter Gleick has admitted that the latter two were one and the same person – himself. I suspect we will soon learn the identity of the forger, as well.
... there was nothing scandalous in the documents. The documents merely showed the inner workings of an influential public policy organization operating on a budget that was quite small compared to environmental activist groups such as Greenpeace, the Sierra Club and Environmental Defense. Indeed, the internal documents refuted the false, yet often repeated assertions that the Heartland Institute’s powerful climate realism message is largely funded by Big Oil, Big Coal or Big Whatever....
The only thing that would seem to undermine the Heartland Institute’s credibility was the wording of the fake “2012 Climate Strategy” document. Computer forensics experts quickly discovered the climate strategy document was created by a different computer program and at a different time than the legitimate documents. The climate strategy document was also written in much different language, style, format and font than the legitimate documents. And long before Gleick confessed to being the fraudster and thief at the heart of the stolen documents, analysts noted a striking similarity between the language and style of the forged document and the language and style of Gleick’s public writings.
The real story in this Fakegate scandal is how the global warming movement is desperate, delusional and collapsing as global warming fails to live up to alarmist predictions. People with sound science on their side do not need to forge documents to validate their arguments or make the other side look bad. Also, people who are so desperate as to forge documents in an attempt to frame their rivals are clearly not above forging scientific data, studies and facts to similarly further their cause....
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/02/22/fakegate-…
There never was a “leaker” in the shameful Fakegate scandal. In the end, there was only a forger, a fraudster and a thief. Alarmist scientist Peter Gleick has admitted that the latter two were one and the same person – himself. I suspect we will soon learn the identity of the forger, as well.
... there was nothing scandalous in the documents. The documents merely showed the inner workings of an influential public policy organization operating on a budget that was quite small compared to environmental activist groups such as Greenpeace, the Sierra Club and Environmental Defense. Indeed, the internal documents refuted the false, yet often repeated assertions that the Heartland Institute’s powerful climate realism message is largely funded by Big Oil, Big Coal or Big Whatever....
The only thing that would seem to undermine the Heartland Institute’s credibility was the wording of the fake “2012 Climate Strategy” document. Computer forensics experts quickly discovered the climate strategy document was created by a different computer program and at a different time than the legitimate documents. The climate strategy document was also written in much different language, style, format and font than the legitimate documents. And long before Gleick confessed to being the fraudster and thief at the heart of the stolen documents, analysts noted a striking similarity between the language and style of the forged document and the language and style of Gleick’s public writings.
The real story in this Fakegate scandal is how the global warming movement is desperate, delusional and collapsing as global warming fails to live up to alarmist predictions. People with sound science on their side do not need to forge documents to validate their arguments or make the other side look bad. Also, people who are so desperate as to forge documents in an attempt to frame their rivals are clearly not above forging scientific data, studies and facts to similarly further their cause....
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/02/22/fakegate-…
Durchsuchen
