checkAd

    Wetter- & Klimaereignisse mit hohen Versicherungsschäden (Seite 81)

    eröffnet am 23.07.06 10:54:56 von
    neuester Beitrag 22.11.23 13:54:55 von
    Beiträge: 1.741
    ID: 1.072.619
    Aufrufe heute: 0
    Gesamt: 127.654
    Aktive User: 0

    Werte aus der Branche Finanzdienstleistungen

    WertpapierKursPerf. %
    0,6800+312,12
    0,5300+17,78
    12,300+14,37
    1,7000+12,77
    24,800+9,73
    WertpapierKursPerf. %
    1,5000-23,08
    3,0000-24,91
    0,7500-25,00
    17,850-30,00
    1,5000-90,00

    Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben

     Durchsuchen
    • 1
    • 81
    • 175

    Begriffe und/oder Benutzer

     

    Top-Postings

     Ja Nein
      Avatar
      schrieb am 29.11.16 18:55:03
      Beitrag Nr. 941 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 53.794.530 von XIO am 29.11.16 18:41:14
      deine (Bauern)Logik ist mittlerweile wohl bekannt


      du willst Die Wahrheit, und Dich nicht "manipulieren" lassen(soweit O.K., auch sympathisch), und ziehst Dich SELBER zu den größten Schei**haustheorien hin :laugh::laugh::laugh:
      Avatar
      schrieb am 29.11.16 18:41:14
      Beitrag Nr. 940 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 53.669.160 von Popeye82 am 10.11.16 22:26:00Es ist auch gleich viel wärmer geworden, als normal.
      1 Antwort
      Avatar
      schrieb am 10.11.16 22:26:00
      Beitrag Nr. 939 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 53.653.695 von Popeye82 am 09.11.16 12:56:17
      Zitat von Popeye82: ich könnte heulen, und kotzen



      soeben ist die Klimapolitik weit, weit zurückgeworfen worden




      www.forbes.com/sites/kensilverstein/2016/11/10/trump-is-cast…
      2 Antworten
      Avatar
      schrieb am 09.11.16 12:56:17
      Beitrag Nr. 938 ()
      ich könnte heulen, und kotzen



      soeben ist die Klimapolitik weit, weit zurückgeworfen worden
      3 Antworten
      Avatar
      schrieb am 07.11.16 11:50:56
      Beitrag Nr. 937 ()
      Brennpunkt Klima Schweiz
      www.naturwissenschaften.ch/organisations/proclim/activities/…
      www.naturwissenschaften.ch/organisations/proclim/activities/…



      Trading Spotlight

      Anzeige
      Nurexone Biologic
      0,4220EUR +2,93 %
      Die bessere Technologie im Pennystock-Kleid?!mehr zur Aktie »
      Avatar
      schrieb am 03.11.16 23:17:00
      Beitrag Nr. 936 ()
      Wir hatten einen Wirbelsturm im Mittelmeer. Im Mittelmeer???? Antwort: JA

      Das ist ein Ereignis was es meines Wissens nach noch gar nicht gegeben hat. Es gab mal 2004 oder 2005 einen Wirbelstrum vom Atlantik der den Sprung bis zur spanischen Küste geschafft hat. Aber im Mittelmeer selber gab es das meines Wissens nach noch nicht. In dem Artikel heißt es, das letzte Mal gab es das 2011 über dem Mittelmeer. Ich habe das damals nicht mitbekommen. Man muss diese Seite etwas mit Vorsicht genießen. Ob diese Aussage stimmt oder nicht, mit 2011 kann ich nicht nachprüfen.


      Klimawandel: Tropischer Sturm bildete sich erstmals über Mittelmeer
      http://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2016/11/03/tropis…

      Grüße

      Steve!
      Avatar
      schrieb am 03.11.16 22:35:58
      Beitrag Nr. 935 ()
      Protecting False Creek from rising sea levels will cost Vancouver up to $800,000,000

      www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/protecting-false-cre…
      Avatar
      schrieb am 26.10.16 22:49:40
      Beitrag Nr. 934 ()
      UCI +NASA document accelerated glacier melting in West Antarctica, Study findings will help improve predictions about global sea level rise

      https://news.uci.edu/research/uci-and-nasa-document-accelera…

      "Two new studies by researchers at the University of California, Irvine and NASA have found the fastest ongoing rates of glacier retreat ever observed in West Antarctica and offer an unprecedented look at ice melting on the floating undersides of glaciers. The results highlight how the interaction between ocean conditions and the bedrock beneath a glacier can influence the frozen mass, helping scientists better predict future Antarctica ice loss and global sea level rise.



      The studies examined three neighboring glaciers that are melting and retreating at different rates. The Smith, Pope and Kohler glaciers flow into the Dotson and Crosson ice shelves in the Amundsen Sea embayment in West Antarctica, the part of the continent with the largest decline in ice.

      “Our primary question is how the Amundsen Sea sector of West Antarctica will contribute to sea level rise in the future, particularly following our observations of massive changes in the area over the last two decades,” said UCI’s Bernd Scheuchl, lead author on the first of the two studies, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters in August.

      “Using satellite data, we continue to measure the evolution of the grounding line of these glaciers, which helps us determine their stability and how much mass the glacier is gaining or losing,” said the Earth system scientist. “Our results show that the observed glaciers continue to lose mass and thus contribute to global sea level rise.”

      Scheuchl’s team compared radar measurements from the European Space Agency’s Sentinel-1 mission and data from the earlier ERS-1 and ERS-2 satellites to identify changes in each glacier’s grounding line – the boundary where it loses contact with bedrock and begins to float on the ocean.

      The grounding line is important because nearly all glacier melting takes place on the underside of this floating portion, called the ice shelf. If a glacier loses mass from enhanced melting, it may start floating farther inland from its former grounding line, just as a boat stuck on a sandbar may be able to float again if a heavy cargo is removed. This is called grounding line retreat.

      UCI and NASA researchers found that the Smith Glacier’s grounding line had retreated 1.24 miles (2 kilometers) per year since 1996. The Pope Glacier’s grounding line receded more slowly, at 0.31 miles (0.5 kilometers) annually since 1996. And the Kohler Glacier’s grounding line, which had gradually retreated, actually readvanced 1.24 miles (2 kilometers) since 2011.

      Scheuchl credits the Sentinel-1 radar mission with changing the way scientists look at polar ice sheets. “It’s a two-satellite constellation with funding for more than 20 years, and Europe is committing resources for regular ice sheet data acquisitions,” he said. “Our work shows that the data collected is very well-suited for ice sheet science, and we can combine it with other satellite and airborne data sets to establish a more detailed record of these glaciers.”

      For a separate study, the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s Ala Khazendar – a co-author of Scheuchl’s paper – measured ice loss at the bottom of the three glaciers, which he suspected might be influencing the changes in their grounding lines. His work, published today in the journal Nature Communications, involved gauging the thickness and height of the ice via radar and laser altimetry instruments utilized in NASA’s Operation IceBridge and earlier NASA airborne campaigns.

      Radar waves penetrate glaciers all the way to their base, allowing direct assessment of how the bottom profiles of the three glaciers at their grounding lines differed between 2002 and 2014. Laser measurements of surface elevation were used to infer changes in the thickness of the floating ice shelves.

      Previous studies using other techniques estimated the average melting rates at the bottom of the Dotson and Crosson ice shelves to be about 40 feet (12 meters) per year. Khazendar and his team, analyzing their direct radar measurements, found stunning rates of ice loss from the glaciers’ undersides on the ocean sides of their grounding lines. The fastest-melting glacier, Smith, lost between 984 and 1,607 feet (300 and 490 meters) in thickness between 2002 and 2009 near its grounding line, or up to 230 feet (70 meters) per year.

      Those years encompass a period when rapid mass loss was seen around the Amundsen Sea. The regional scale of the decline made scientists strongly suspect that an increase in the influx of ocean heat beneath the ice shelves must have taken place. “Our observations provide a crucial piece of evidence to support that suspicion, as they directly reveal the intensity of ice melting at the bottom of the glaciers during that period,” Khazendar said.

      “If I had been using data from only one instrument, I wouldn’t have believed what I was looking at, because the thinning was so large,” he added. However, the two IceBridge instruments, which employ different techniques, both measured the same rapid ice loss.

      Khazendar said Smith’s fast retreat and thinning are likely related to the shape of the underlying bedrock over which it was retreating between 1996 and 2014, which sloped downward toward the continental interior, and oceanic conditions in the cavity beneath the glacier. As the grounding line receded, warm and dense ocean water could reach the newly uncovered deeper parts of this cavity, causing more melting.

      As a result, Khazendar said, “more sections of the glacier become thinner and float, meaning that the grounding line continues retreating, and so on.” Smith’s retreat might slow down now that its grounding line has reached bedrock that rises farther inland of the 2014 grounding line. Pope and Kohler, in contrast, are on bedrock that slopes upward toward the interior.

      The question remains whether other glaciers in West Antarctica will behave more like Smith or more like Pope and Kohler. Many glaciers in this sector of Antarctica are on beds that deepen farther inland, like Smith’s. However, Khazendar and Scheuchl said, researchers need more information on the shape of the bedrock and seafloor beneath the ice, as well as more data on ocean circulation and temperatures, to be able to better project how much ice these glaciers will contribute to the ocean in a changing climate.

      Scheuchl’s co-authors on the Geophysical Research Letters study are JPL’s Khazendar and Jeremie Mouginot, Mathieu Morlighem and Eric Rignot from UCI’s Department of Earth System Science.

      Khazendar’s co-authors on the Nature Communications study are UCI’s Mouginot, Rignot, Scheuchl and Isabella Velicogna, along with Dustin Schroeder, Helene Seroussi, Michael Schodlok and Tyler Sutterley of JPL.

      About the University of California, Irvine: Founded in 1965, UCI is the youngest member of the prestigious Association of American Universities. The campus has produced three Nobel laureates and is known for its academic achievement, premier research, innovation and anteater mascot. Led by Chancellor Howard Gillman, UCI has more than 30,000 students and offers 192 degree programs. It’s located in one of the world’s safest and most economically vibrant communities and is Orange County’s second-largest employer, contributing $5 billion annually to the local economy. For more on UCI, visit www.uci.edu.

      Media access: Radio programs/stations may, for a fee, use an on-campus ISDN line to interview UCI faculty and experts, subject to availability and university approval. For more UCI news, visit news.uci.edu. Additional resources for journalists may be found at communications.uci.edu/for-journalists."
      Avatar
      schrieb am 24.10.16 20:35:02
      Beitrag Nr. 933 ()
      Avatar
      schrieb am 06.10.16 18:03:37
      Beitrag Nr. 932 ()
      [/url]

      Aktuell sieht es nicht danach aus, dass der Hurrikan in den Golf zieht. Da würds dann ordentlich rappeln. Die Situation ist deswegen keineswegs ungefährlich. Weil der Wirbelsturm in folge der extremen Wasstemperaturen recht ordentlich noch an Kraft gewinnen kann.

      mfg
      Steve!
      • 1
      • 81
      • 175
       DurchsuchenBeitrag schreiben


      Investoren beobachten auch:

      WertpapierPerf. %
      -0,83
      -0,16
      +1,22
      -0,79
      -0,15
      -0,13
      0,00
      -1,45
      +0,12
      -0,13
      Wetter- & Klimaereignisse mit hohen Versicherungsschäden