Washington Mutual - Grösste Sparkasse der USA! Chancen & Risiken. (Seite 21052)
eröffnet am 10.04.08 16:35:03 von
neuester Beitrag 24.04.24 15:00:31 von
neuester Beitrag 24.04.24 15:00:31 von
Beiträge: 343.748
ID: 1.140.302
ID: 1.140.302
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 18.351.236
Gesamt: 18.351.236
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: US62482R1077 · WKN: A2N7G5 · Symbol: COOP
78,76
USD
-3,62 %
-2,96 USD
Letzter Kurs 25.04.24 Nasdaq
Neuigkeiten
24.04.24 · Business Wire (engl.)  |
23.04.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
05.04.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
09.02.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
Werte aus der Branche Finanzdienstleistungen
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 15,000 | +900,00 | |
| 7,5000 | +50,00 | |
| 25,50 | +42,86 | |
| 1,5100 | +37,27 | |
| 35,50 | +19,33 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 8,4200 | -11,74 | |
| 34,28 | -14,02 | |
| 1,5000 | -23,08 | |
| 3,0000 | -24,91 | |
| 5,2250 | -50,38 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 38.546.718 von born2live am 10.12.09 19:54:42du triffst den nagel auf den kopf !
dieses szenario nennen user dann : da wissen einige mehr
weiter abwarten
dieses szenario nennen user dann : da wissen einige mehr
weiter abwarten
I-Hub - bzgl. G-Reorganization
Posted by: mordicai
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:55:18 AM
In reply to: knick who wrote msg# 124973 Post # of 125024
Come on . You have to ask me. A little research on G reorganization, and from that he concludes commons are going to get wiped. LOL. Yet here we have billions of dollars of lawsuits filed by reputable law firms, based on federal statutes, and this little entry negates all the positives that exist for commons. Don't you think the professionals would be doing hundreds of hours of research on The g reorganization? Also read his posts from yesterday and go to his tax link. WHere does it state that in a g reorganization commons can't share in new commons. No where.
Posted by: mordicai
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:55:18 AM
In reply to: knick who wrote msg# 124973 Post # of 125024
Come on . You have to ask me. A little research on G reorganization, and from that he concludes commons are going to get wiped. LOL. Yet here we have billions of dollars of lawsuits filed by reputable law firms, based on federal statutes, and this little entry negates all the positives that exist for commons. Don't you think the professionals would be doing hundreds of hours of research on The g reorganization? Also read his posts from yesterday and go to his tax link. WHere does it state that in a g reorganization commons can't share in new commons. No where.
I-Hub
Posted by: Chiron
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:03:22 AM
In reply to: mordicai who wrote msg# 124944 Post # of 125024
Mordy, we agree to disagree. I think Walrath has to get this dead right, it is a career defining moment. If she rules for WMI it is going to open a floodgate here.
The 'safe' route for her is to send it to trial. We'll see what she is made of soon enough.
---------------------------
Posted by: mordicai
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:12:31 AM
In reply to: Chiron who wrote msg# 124946 Post # of 125024
she already stated it was a mature debt due and owing at 6/24. To combat the summary judgment, jpm and the fdic had to come up with a genuine dispute of a material fact. They did not. They merely speculated. SO she has to grant the summary judgment because the holding company is entitled to it under the law procedurally. JPM and the fdic failed to meet their burden. Moreover, she would have denied it by now. Nothing threatens her career more than being lax on making decisions.
Posted by: Chiron
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:03:22 AM
In reply to: mordicai who wrote msg# 124944 Post # of 125024
Mordy, we agree to disagree. I think Walrath has to get this dead right, it is a career defining moment. If she rules for WMI it is going to open a floodgate here.
The 'safe' route for her is to send it to trial. We'll see what she is made of soon enough.
---------------------------
Posted by: mordicai
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:12:31 AM
In reply to: Chiron who wrote msg# 124946 Post # of 125024
she already stated it was a mature debt due and owing at 6/24. To combat the summary judgment, jpm and the fdic had to come up with a genuine dispute of a material fact. They did not. They merely speculated. SO she has to grant the summary judgment because the holding company is entitled to it under the law procedurally. JPM and the fdic failed to meet their burden. Moreover, she would have denied it by now. Nothing threatens her career more than being lax on making decisions.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 38.546.697 von SilberIgel am 10.12.09 19:51:18vielleicht hätte er erst heute gekauft, wenn er es gewußt hätte?
Vielleicht hatte er auch nur Angst, dass er was verpasst und dafür auf ein paar Prozente verzichtet, wenn er sich ziemlich sicher ist, dass was Großes kommt.
Wie auch immer, wir werden es wohl nie erfahren
Vielleicht hatte er auch nur Angst, dass er was verpasst und dafür auf ein paar Prozente verzichtet, wenn er sich ziemlich sicher ist, dass was Großes kommt.
Wie auch immer, wir werden es wohl nie erfahren
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 38.546.623 von body1 am 10.12.09 19:41:08nehmen wir mal an es kommt zu einem settlement per stock swap.
ich würde mich nicht wundern, wenn man den wert nach oben kurz vorher frei lässt, um somit die letzten kleinen rauszuhauen.
mal ehrlich, die meisten würden hier doch schon bei 1 usd verkaufen
ich würde mich nicht wundern, wenn man den wert nach oben kurz vorher frei lässt, um somit die letzten kleinen rauszuhauen.
mal ehrlich, die meisten würden hier doch schon bei 1 usd verkaufen
Trading Spotlight
Naja die werden schon wissen warum sie überall einsammeln, ...
meine bekommen die nich!
meine bekommen die nich!
Ihub:
Posted by: Chiron
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009 10:58:03 AM
In reply to: rickszy who wrote msg# 124933 Post # of 125024
Walrath isn't going to rule on the 4.4 Billion until she is forced to by the upcoming March 10 reorg deadline. She obviously is working on a monster ruling document here, and needs more time.
It took her 4 months to rule on the Noteholders issue, which was nothing compared to SJ, and that was 20 pages!!!!
SJ on the 4 Billion could be a freaking dissertation. I expect it in late Jan/Feb so that WMI has enough time to consider the money in the reorg plan.
------------------------
Posted by: mordicai
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:01:11 AM
In reply to: Chiron who wrote msg# 124943 Post # of 125024
I disagree with you. Any day now.
------------------------
Posted by: SamuraiProgrammer
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:03:45 AM
In reply to: mordicai who wrote msg# 124944 Post # of 125021
I appreciate your opinions mordicai. I have a question.
On a scale of 1-10 with 10 being the strongest, how strong is your opinion.
-------------------------
Posted by: mordicai Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:28:39 AM
In reply to: SamuraiProgrammer who wrote msg# 124947 Post # of 125021
10. I think she will do it before the 18th. Judges don't like to have the lawyers before them when they make decisions. Serve the opinion on them a few days beforehand so the loser cools off before the next hearing. Then kind of grin at the fdic when she says request for relief is moot. Time is on my side. She has had enough time.
Posted by: Chiron
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009 10:58:03 AM
In reply to: rickszy who wrote msg# 124933 Post # of 125024
Walrath isn't going to rule on the 4.4 Billion until she is forced to by the upcoming March 10 reorg deadline. She obviously is working on a monster ruling document here, and needs more time.
It took her 4 months to rule on the Noteholders issue, which was nothing compared to SJ, and that was 20 pages!!!!
SJ on the 4 Billion could be a freaking dissertation. I expect it in late Jan/Feb so that WMI has enough time to consider the money in the reorg plan.
------------------------
Posted by: mordicai
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:01:11 AM
In reply to: Chiron who wrote msg# 124943 Post # of 125024
I disagree with you. Any day now.
------------------------
Posted by: SamuraiProgrammer
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:03:45 AM
In reply to: mordicai who wrote msg# 124944 Post # of 125021
I appreciate your opinions mordicai. I have a question.
On a scale of 1-10 with 10 being the strongest, how strong is your opinion.
-------------------------
Posted by: mordicai Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:28:39 AM
In reply to: SamuraiProgrammer who wrote msg# 124947 Post # of 125021
10. I think she will do it before the 18th. Judges don't like to have the lawyers before them when they make decisions. Serve the opinion on them a few days beforehand so the loser cools off before the next hearing. Then kind of grin at the fdic when she says request for relief is moot. Time is on my side. She has had enough time.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 38.546.666 von user_unknown am 10.12.09 19:47:06Dachte nur heute hätte er fürs gleiche Geld mehr als 8 Millionen bekommen egal wie auch immer
ich habe irgendwo in den Threads gelesen das er schon länger gesperrt ist...!?
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 38.546.173 von Heicors am 10.12.09 18:46:15Hallo Heicors,
ich bin auch eine stille Mitleserin und seit einem Jahr investiert.
Würde mich über eine Einladung in das neue Forum sehr freuen!
Werde mich auch dort ebenfalls ruhig verhalten. Würde mich freuen, weiterhin Eure interessanten Berichte und News zu Wamuq zu lesen.
Besten Dank.
Katharina
ich bin auch eine stille Mitleserin und seit einem Jahr investiert.
Würde mich über eine Einladung in das neue Forum sehr freuen!
Werde mich auch dort ebenfalls ruhig verhalten. Würde mich freuen, weiterhin Eure interessanten Berichte und News zu Wamuq zu lesen.
Besten Dank.
Katharina
Durchsuchen
