Schon komisch: nachdem Intel schon von seinen ersten 65nm-CPUs (wohl nicht vor 2006) redet, fangen sie sogar schon davon an, von CPUs (z.B. Merom) zu reden, die erst 2007 kommen sollen...
Sieht etwas Intels Roadmap für 2006 auch nicht so toll aus?
Ein sehr interessant zu lesender Artikel auf theinquierer: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19110
"How Intel will rip up its current roadmaps ..."
ein paar bits daraus:
"...Intel`s official cancellation of the 4.0GHz Pentium 4 is only the beginning of the problem. The 65nm variant called Cedar Mill, if it ever comes out, is only expected to clock to 4.4GHz, a piddling increase...
... We don`t think Cedar Mill has any more future than Tejas had..."
"...The problem is that Prescott is not yielding parts that run at 1066MHz FSB. The chipsets have been ready for months, but there is nothing to run on them. The 1066 parts were pushed back and pushed back, and now they are to become a boutique part, the EE line...."
"... The most serious problem for Intel is not in desktops but in the server market. Its chips are hot, slow and expensive to make. ..."
"...Intel has a strong server reputation and can ride this out for some time. But Potomac, an MP version due in Q1 2005, is already rumoured to have vastly underwhelming performance, reputation alone may not carry Intel for that long...
... For 2005 and 2006, the future is Opteron and Xeon just can not play in the same league any more..."
...genau so würde ich das auch sehen
