Fenster schließen  |  Fenster drucken

We are on the verge of some of the greatest market convulsions of a lifetime.

And we\'re already seeing the first symptoms: Oil surging to all-time highs … gold making a beeline for $800 per ounce … long-term bonds suffering their worst one-day decline since 2003 … and behind it all, the U.S. dollar getting slammed day after day, now within just an inch of its lowest level in history.

The Great Dollar Panic of 2007-2008:
Urgent Self-Defense and
Massive Profit Opportunities

Edited Transcript of Emergency Video Summit

Bob Nichols: Hello, everyone. I\'ve been a financial TV journalist and news anchor for 30 years. I\'ve interviewed countless experts and I\'ve witnessed a myriad of crises. But I can tell you flatly: I have never — ever — seen anything like what\'s happening in the financial markets today.

Not just a housing bust, but also a mortgage meltdown. Not just a mortgage meltdown, but also a credit crunch. Not just a credit crunch, but also a dollar panic.

This is why you need self-defense so urgently. This is why the profit opportunities are so massive. And this is also why we have come together to hold this Emergency Video Summit.

With us today is Martin Weiss, the founder of Weiss Research and the editor of the Safe Money Report. Martin Weiss is also the Chairman of the Sound Dollar Committee, an organization that has been fighting for a sound dollar ever since the Eisenhower years.

Also with us today is Jack Crooks, one of the nation\'s leading experts on the dollar and foreign currencies.

Martin, this month, something very unusual happened: In a landmark speech, the most widely known economic leader of our times, former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, talked about something that you and your team have been writing about all year.

He said that today\'s credit crisis is identical to the crisis of 1998, when small Asian economies tanked and a major hedge fund, Long Term Capital Management, collapsed. Do you agree?
Greenspan says the great crisis he dealt with in 1998 was similar to today\'s. But the reality is that his successor, Ben Bernanke, is now trying to deal with a crisis that is many times larger.

Martin Weiss: No, I disagree. I think this credit crisis is many times larger.

Back in 1998, Greenspan was dealing with a small tumor in our financial system that could quickly be isolated and contained. Today, his successor, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, is dealing with a cancer that has already spread throughout the financial system.

Bob: How is that going to impact investors like me?

Martin: Almost everything you own that\'s in U.S. dollars — almost every stock, bond, real estate property, insurance policy, or business asset — is impacted because of the falling value of the dollar.

Bob: I see the housing market collapsing. My brain tells me it can\'t be true, that it can\'t really be happening. But my eyes and ears tell me it is happening.

All day long, at work, folks are talking about \"For Sale\" signs going up everywhere in their neighborhoods, about new homes being foreclosed on. Then, I go home and turn on the evening news, and there it is again! Everyone is talking about it. But no one is doing anything about it. They\'re all just sitting around waiting for the next shoe to drop.

Martin: But you don\'t have to sit around. You don\'t have to wait for the next shoe to drop. You can harness the tremendous power of this situation to build your wealth. And because this crisis is so large — many times larger than it was last time — I think you can do it with greater ease, greater certainty and greater speed than at almost any time in modern history.

Bob: I assume you\'re going to walk us through that, step by step, before the hour is over. But first, tell us exactly why you think this crisis is so much larger than the 1998 crisis.

Martin: I don\'t just think it\'s larger. I know it\'s larger.

Back in 1998, Greenspan was dealing with a crisis that was isolated and easily contained. Now, in 2007, Bernanke is dealing with a crisis that is already spreading out of control to 20,000 cities and towns across America.

In 1998, the epicenter of the crisis was small Asian markets. This time, the epicenter is right here in the United States, with financial markets that are at least a hundred times larger.

In 1998, Greenspan was dealing with just one major hedge fund in trouble. He was able to sit down with the big banks. They were able to hash out a bailout. They were able to nip the crisis in the bud.

Now, Bernanke is trying to cope with at least a thousand hedge funds in this sector. If even just one-tenth of them are entangled in this mess — and there\'s every indication they are — that alone is 100 times more than 1998. Plus, this time, we already have 140 mortgage companies in trouble, bankrupt or mortally wounded.

Greenspan\'s 1998 crisis was a ripple. Bernanke\'s 2007 crisis is a tidal wave.

Bob: But where — exactly where — do you think the tidal wave is going to strike?

Martin: Going to strike? It\'s already striking. Bernanke is facing a tidal wave of foreclosures in the $824 billion subprime mortgage market … the $722 billion Alt-A mortgage market … the $517 billion jumbo mortgage market … and, ultimately, in the entire $13.5 trillion mortgage market.

Bob: $13.5 trillion in mortgages? How much is that really?

Martin: It\'s similar in size to the entire GDP of the United States. It\'s the largest debt market in the world. Plus, as if that weren\'t enough, Bernanke faces a far broader crisis that threatens to spread to many more debt markets.

Not only the $13.5 trillion mortgage market, but also the $2.2 trillion U.S commercial paper market … the $2.4 trillion consumer credit market … the $10.1 trillion corporate bond market … and, biggest of all, the $144.8 trillion in derivatives held by U.S. banks alone.

Bob: So what is Bernanke going to do about it?

Martin: You keep talking about this as if it were in the future tense. Where is the meltdown \"going\" to strike? What is Bernanke \"going\" to do about it? But this is not a future event. It\'s a present, ongoing situation that\'s unfolding rapidly, that\'s accelerating even as we speak.

Bob: So if it\'s already spreading and Bernanke can\'t perform micro-surgery, how is he coping with it?

Martin: The only way he knows how: One — with interest-rate cuts. Two — by pumping more money into the U.S. banking system. Three — with more government bailouts.

Bob: This is what the American people want. And this is what the U.S. government provides. So everyone\'s happy, right?

Martin: Not exactly.There\'s another group of people, a very large and powerful group of people, who are extremely unhappy about this situation.

Bob: Who\'s that?

Martin: Foreign investors holding U.S. dollars.

Bob: Is that really such a big factor?

Martin: Are you kidding? It\'s a huge factor. Back in the late 1990s, the dollars held by foreign investors amounted to about one and a half trillion, and even then there were some people who were very alarmed. \"Wow! This is dangerous,\" they said. \"Foreign investors and central banks control over one trillion in our wealth! What happens to us if they decide to pull out?\"

But look what happened next! The amount of dollars in the hands of foreigners grew by leaps and bounds. There are now over 7 trillion in U.S. dollars held by foreign investors and central banks, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.

Here\'s the truly big change: Now, they have virtually no reason to hang on to dollars issued by a country with an economy that\'s wracked by crisis, that\'s debasing its own currency, and that\'s sliding into recession.

And they have every reason to stop buying dollars or to convert their dollar into currencies issued by nations that do not have a housing bust … that do not have a mortgage meltdown … that do not have a recession.

I repeat: Foreign investors and central banks now hold over $7 trillion in U.S. bonds, U.S. stocks, U.S. money markets … plus U.S. real estate and U.S. mortgages.

Bob: You told us how the Fed is responding to this crisis. Now tell us how foreign investors are responding to the Fed\'s response.

Martin: First, the interest-rate cuts in the U.S. mean lower yields on their dollars. Second, more money-pumping by the Fed floods paper dollars into the marketplace and guts the value of the dollar. Third, more government bailouts gut the dollar\'s value still more.

So all these steps — everything the government does to supposedly save the housing market — just drives the dollar down further.

Bob: OK. I see the power of foreign investors. Over $7 trillion! I had no idea it was that much. But help me get into the mind of the foreign investor, so I can really feel what you\'re talking about.

Martin: Sure. Let\'s say you\'re a big foreign investor. You\'ve got a lot of money in U.S. real estate and mortgages. And you\'ve got a lot more money in U.S. bonds and U.S. stocks.

Because of the U.S. housing and mortgage crisis, you\'re taking a big loss on some of your money invested in America. That\'s bad enough.

But because of Mr. Bernanke\'s response to the crisis, you\'re also taking a loss on all of your money invested in America, because the U.S. dollar itself is sinking in value.

Bob: The cure is worse than the disease.

Martin: Yes. If Mr. Bernanke fails to end the crisis, you want out. And if he succeeds by flooding the world with paper dollars, you also want out. Either way, this is one hospital you want to check out of.

Bob: OK. Could you sum this up? So we can see the big picture?

Martin: First, we know that there are similarities between the 1998 crisis and the 2007 crisis. Even former Fed Chairman Greenspan is saying that now.

Second, we have evidence — plenty of evidence — that today\'s situation could be many times worse than the 1998 crisis.

Third, it\'s clear that all this is driving the U.S. dollar down and that the dollar will continue to go down no matter what the Fed does. If they do too little, the dollar will go down because of the housing bust and mortgage meltdown. If they do too much, the dollar will go down because of cheap dollars flooding our economy. Either way, the dollar is going down.

How To Harness This Crisis
To Transform it Into a Massive
Profit Opportunity

Bob: That\'s clear. Now, here\'s the $64,000 question: How do you do what you told us about earlier — how do you harness the crisis? How do you transform it into a massive profit opportunity?

Martin: The dollar is crashing. So you profit by investing in currencies that are surging against the dollar. That\'s the simple answer. But to give you a much more specific answer on exactly which currency to buy and how to buy it, I\'ve invited our currency expert, Jack Crooks, to join us.

Bob: And I\'m glad you did! Jack has over 20 years experience in the currency market, and he is especially well versed in the 1998 crisis and the profit opportunities that are possible in precisely this kind of situation. Jack, you heard what Martin said earlier — that you can harness these powerful forces in your favor. How do you do that?

Jack: With the Japanese yen. The Japanese yen has emerged as the world\'s premier crisis currency. In 1998, when there was a crisis like this one, the yen went through the roof. And that\'s what it\'s starting to do now in 2007.

Bob: Can you take us back to 1998 and show us, step by step, how that happened?

Jack: Yes. The time is 1998. Small Asian economies have collapsed. Later, Russia defaults on its massive debts. And the giant U.S. hedge fund, Long Term Capital Management, comes to the brink of collapse.

Fears sweep the world that the entire financial system could be brought to its knees. But the biggest impact of the crisis is also the least understood — in the currency market, especially in the gigantic market for Japanese yen.

Bob: And why is that?

Jack: Because of the yen-carry trade.

Bob: Please explain how that works step by step.

Jack: Step 1. Investors borrow Japanese yen at very low interest rates.

Step 2. They convert the yen into U.S. dollars and other currencies.

Step 3. They then take that money and buy higher yielding, riskier investments elsewhere around the globe.

That\'s the yen-carry trade, and in 1998, it was already huge — close to $140 billion. But that\'s not the big problem. The big problem comes when they try to unwind this trade.

Bob: Please explain why that would happen.

Jack: For three powerful reasons: In a global crisis like we saw in 1998, and like we\'re seeing now, the first thing that happens is that investors in the yen carry trade start to suffer losses.

The second thing that happens is that they suddenly discover that their investments are a lot riskier than they originally thought.

And third, their financing costs go up when Japan raises interest rates.

Bob: So walk us through how that unwinding process unfolds.

Jack: They just reverse the transaction I told you about a moment ago:

Step 1. They sell their investments in the U.S. (and elsewhere).

Step 2. They buy back Japanese yen to pay back all those loans from Japan.

Step 3. When they rush to buy yen, naturally, they drive up the value of the Japanese yen.

Bob: So the more this crisis unfolds, the higher the yen should go. Is that how it happens?

Jack: That\'s exactly how it happens, and 1998 is a perfect example of that.

Let\'s go back to the summer of 1998. The yen is gradually meandering higher. Then, suddenly, the crisis — the same one Greenspan was talking about and that we\'ve been talking about today — hits the marketplace. So investors rush to buy back yen, and there\'s a sudden surge in the currency.

Within just a month, the Japanese yen surges by over 20%, one of the largest and sharpest moves in the history of major world currencies. Look at that yen go!

But it\'s not over yet. The unwinding of the yen-carry trade continues to drive the yen higher at a rapid pace for over a year. And that, by the way, happens even though the Japanese economy is weak.

Bob: How does that compare to a typically large move in foreign currencies?

Jack: It\'s several times larger than some of the largest foreign currency moves in history. Typically, if you get a currency move of 4% or 5% in a single month, that\'s a lot. This is twenty percent!

Bob: That was 1998. What about now? Are they still doing the yen-carry trade like they used to? Is it still as big?

Martin: Ha-ha! Still as big?! Show him the next slide, Jack.

Jack: Back in 1998, the yen-carry trade was about $140 billion. Now it\'s estimated to be about $1 trillion! That\'s about seven times more, driving that much more money into the yen.

Martin: Plus, don\'t forget the other factors I talked about earlier:

In 1998, the crisis was isolated. Now it\'s spreading like wildfire. That drives more money into the yen.

In 1998, it was triggered by smaller economies abroad. In 2007, it\'s triggered by a massive housing bust and mortgage meltdown in the United States. That drives more money into the yen.

In 1998, you had just one hedge fund in trouble. In 2007, you\'re talking about thousands of hedge funds and institutions dragged into the mess. That drives still more money into the yen.

Jack: Never in all my 20 years in the currency market have I seen the stars line up like this!

Bob: I\'m doing the math here. The Japanese yen surged 20% in just one month back in 1998. This time, you gentlemen are telling me that the forces lined up to drive the yen higher are many times bigger. So what does that mean for the yen?

Jack: You can\'t plug a formula into this and say \"A times B equals C.\" But you can say, and with a high degree of confidence: There is a far greater chance of a bigger move in the yen now than there was in 1998.

Bob: Now I see the big picture very clearly. And now I want to know: How do I get into the currency market? The last time I looked into this market a few years ago, it was next to impossible. Either I had to have a fortune, which on a news anchor salary with kids to put in college wasn\'t exactly my situation … or I had to go into the futures market, which isn\'t my cup of tea either. So where does an investor like me go?

Jack: To any stock broker. To use the Philadelphia Exchange\'s new World Currency Options.

Bob: That\'s right. Last month you held a special teleconference on that.

Jack: And this month, I\'m joining Al Brinkman, the man in charge of this whole project at the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, to give another seminar on the subject. This is a revolutionary new investment vehicle for currencies. It gives you huge leverage. And it gives you very limited risk.

Bob: And how are they doing? Is it a success?

Jack: Fabulous success. I just spoke to Al on the phone. And he tells me that, just in the last 30 days, open interest and trading volume have soared on the Philly exchange. It\'s extremely popular. Totally liquid. Very convenient for the average investor.

Bob: Good. I want to ask you more about them in just a moment. But first, here\'s the next thing I absolutely need to know, the thing that\'s so hot my pen is literally burning my fingers. At last month\'s teleconference you gave examples — real-life examples of options. And I can\'t forget this one. You cited one option that produced a profit of 29-to-1. Enough to transform $2,000 into $59,000.

My question is: Was that based on a 20% move in the currency, like the 20% move we saw in the Japanese yen in 1998?

Jack: No. All of those examples were based on much smaller moves in the currencies — 4%, 5%, 6% and so on.

Bob: You mean that if the yen just does what it did in 1998 and just goes up 20%, you could do four or five times better? You could actually take $2,000 up to $250,000?

Jack: Based on the math, that would be right. But don\'t get greedy. Be happy with the potential to get 29- or 30-to-1. And settle for a lot less. These are huge moves, and these instruments give you huge leverage. No guarantees, but if you catch even part of the move, you should do extremely well. And you can play with more than just one currency. The yen is an amazing opportunity, but it\'s not the only game in town.

The World Currency Options offered by the Philadelphia Exchange now cover every major world currency. And you can buy these foreign currency options just like you\'d buy options on any stock or any index.

You can buy options — either puts or calls on the euro, the Japanese yen, the Swiss franc, the British pound, the Canadian dollar, and the Australian dollar.

Bob: What are the advantages?

Jack: There are several. The first advantage is the tiny minimums — as little as $100.

Bob: You mean I can start investing in several of these with just a few hundred bucks?

Jack: Absolutely. The second advantage is the limited risk. You can never lose more than the small amounts you invest, plus any broker commissions, of course.

Bob: And the third advantage?

Jack: Huge leverage! As much as 200-to-1, depending on the option. That means you can multiply your profits many times over.

Bob: And you can buy these just like ordinary stock options?

Jack: Exactly like ordinary stock options! The same expiration dates. The same ease of pricing the option. The same standardized contract sizes. The same access through virtually any broker, offline or online. And the same discount commissions.

Plus, there\'s one more huge advantage that I want to tell you about.

Bob: Go ahead.

Jack: These new, revolutionary investment vehicles now open the door to the richest market in the world — the market for foreign currencies, or the Forex market.

The Forex market is, without a doubt, the largest market in the world — and the most liquid: $3 trillion a day trade in the currency market. That\'s more than ALL of the world\'s stock markets combined, with 80% of all that trading in seven major currencies.

The currency market is the most critical market to support global trade and international transactions.

What I like most — one of the reasons I specialize in this market — is that there\'s always a bull market in currencies. It gives you the power to make money regardless of what\'s happening in other markets. Whether the stock market is sinking or soaring … whether real estate is booming or busting … whether interest rates are flying or falling … and regardless of what happens to bonds or commodities.

No matter what\'s happening elsewhere, opportunities abound in the currency market.

Martin: There\'s always a bull market.

Bob: Why is that?

Jack: It\'s pretty simple. Currencies are different from stocks, bonds or commodities in that you make money buying and selling one currency against another.

It\'s like a seesaw: When one is going down, the other one has to be going up. So there is always a bull market.

Plus, equally important is the fact that currencies move independently from stocks and bonds. They are non-correlated.

Bob: What does that mean to the average investor?

Jack: It means that currencies are a great asset class for diversification.

Bob: To me, the greatest advantage of all is the profit potential. And the most fascinating part of your recent teleconference was the examples of profit after profit after profit. I found that absolutely intriguing. Can you run through those again for us real quickly?

Martin: I have those numbers. They\'re from our research department. So let me run through them.

These are examples of how much money you could make in currency options, and the first is dated June 15, 2007.

On June 15, if you had bought a call option on the euro and then sold it on July 12, you could have made 333%. In just 27 days.

And here\'s another one: You could have bought another euro option on June 8 and closed your position 35 days later — on July 13. That one would give you a 700% gain. If you started with $2,000, you\'d be looking at $16,000, minus commissions. And that\'s not the most aggressive on our list.

Bob: Was that the most aggressive one?

Martin: Here\'s one that was more aggressive: It\'s also an option on the euro. It could also have been bought on June 15 and sold on July 12. But it jumped one thousand and eight percent in value. That would have been enough to turn $2,000 into $22,160. In just 35 days.

Jack: And that\'s just the euro. As I said, they now have World Currency Options on all the major world currencies.

Martin: Exactly. Here\'s an example on the British pound: If you had bought a call option on the British pound on June 25 and sold it on July 18, you could have made 845%.

Initial investment: $2,000. End result: $18,910. In just over three weeks.

Let\'s talk about the Canadian dollar. On May 21, you could have bought a Canadian dollar option that jumped 667% over the next 64 days — turning your $2,000 into $15,334.

Or consider the Australian dollar, which has been very strong lately. If you had bought one of its options on April 4 and sold it on July 24, you could have bagged a profit of 785% in 111 days. That\'s enough to turn $2,000 into $17,692.

And again, that\'s not the most aggressive one that was available. You could also have bought an Australian dollar option on May 29 and made a gain of 1,400% 57 days later. A $2,000 investment would have grown to $30,000.

And here\'s another example: You could have bought still another, even more aggressive option on the Aussie dollar on May 29 and watched it soar a staggering 2,867% by July 24. That\'s enough to turn $2,000 into $59,334. Or if you wanted to invest more, you could have invested $10,000 and come away with nearly $300,000 — all in less than two months.

Bob: These are very impressive numbers. And all of these examples were based on relatively small rises in the currencies of 4%, 5% or 6%? And the Japanese yen went up 20% last time we had a crisis like this? But you\'re saying that now, the pressure on the Japanese yen to go up is many times more?

Martin: I hasten to add that no one — not you, not us — can go back in time to grab those profits. And going forward, you can also lose money. It\'s not a one-way street; there are winners and there are losers. The big advantage is that, like with the purchase of any options, your losses are strictly limited to what you invest.
aus der Diskussion: Currency ETFs: The best hedge against the dollar?
Autor (Datum des Eintrages): kep  (24.09.07 13:44:05)
Beitrag: 3 von 7 (ID:31721051)
Alle Angaben ohne Gewähr © wallstreet:online