Fenster schließen  |  Fenster drucken

hier ein Auszug eines Interviews auf money.cnn.com

Diane Swonk: The housing bubble is certainly the root of the problem in the financial markets. If you were a home buyer, you didn't have to have any skin in the game, you didn't have to put any equity down to get a mortgage.

Another problem is the ease with which people can walk away from their homes in this country. A home buyer can say to a bank, "Here are the keys; the house is your problem now. But I'm going to keep my car, my 401(k) and everything else."

No other major industrialized country in the world allows that. And it encouraged homeowners here to take more risk, to put zero money down.

How much at risk were the financial institutions involved? That is, was this degree of intervention really necessary?

Grantham: Leverage is the ultimate demonstration of risk, and we never had system-wide leverage like this before. Ever. We had several firms that were leveraged 30 to 1. [For every $30 of assets on their books, they put up $1 of equity and borrowed the other $29.] At leverage of 30 to 1, you have to lose only about 3% on your $30 worth of assets and your dollar of equity gets wiped out. You're bankrupt.

:rolleyes: oje
 
aus der Diskussion: Tages-Trading-Chancen am Freitag 10.10.2008
Autor (Datum des Eintrages): take02  (10.10.08 13:37:42)
Beitrag: 578 von 1,423 (ID:35515126)
Alle Angaben ohne Gewähr © wallstreetONLINE