|
Gepostet von Body ähmm Enis21 zum nachdenken ! warum mary so gehandelt hat ;-))) What is so speculative about a settlement occurring before she rules on summary judgment? If she didn't think a settlement was forthcoming she wouldn't have postponed the last hearing by a month. It would have been a few days at most instead. Its her job to keep the case moving through her court. --- ^^ so.. aus dem dem Faktenthread steht ja... Clarke (FDIC): The FDIC-R does believe the court should hold off on that ruling on the summary judgement motion. Obviously the parties have different point of view on that. Rosen (WMI): Your honor, the parties' understanding was that the court could make a determination with respect to the summary judgement ruling. If the court did do so, however, the FDIC could come in and seek some form of expedited relief and we would have a hearing at that time. --- Wenn ich das richtig übersetze, dann sagt Rosen "expedited relief", dass falls die Richterin die 4 Milliarden für WMI zustimmt, würde die FDIC zu einer "beschleunigten Unterstützung" kommen und wir würden eine Anhörung haben. Daraufhin hat Mary gesagt "I don't need any more emergencies". Nun stelle ich es mal so in den Raum, dass es Wink mit dem Zaunpfahl ist! --- Keine Handelsaufforderung (Totalverlust möglich) |
|
| aus der Diskussion: | Washington Mutual - Faktentread |
| Autor (Datum des Eintrages): | Thisismylife (10.02.10 22:48:08) |
| Beitrag: | 1,104 von 2,807 (ID:38922238) |
| Alle Angaben ohne Gewähr © wallstreetONLINE | |