Kathy hat Dr. Neuhaus eine mail mit Fragen zum wafer level packaging Verfahren einer Japanischen Firma: http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=NPCT&rea… From Kathy: I sent an email to Dr. Neuhaus and Dr. Wernle asking what they could tell me about the new wafer level packaging that was announced by a Japanese company recently and I have received a response from Dr. Neuhaus: Subj: RE: New wafer level packaging technology Date: 10/22/01 10:35:39 AM Eastern Daylight Time From: herb@nanopierce.com (Dr. Herbert J. Neuhaus) Reply-to: herb@nanopierce.com To: KKnightmcc@aol.com CC: michael@nanopierce.com (Michael E Wernle) Hi Kathy: There are literally thousands of variations of flip-chip packaging in existence. Don`t let the alphabet soup confuse you. The site you sent refers to a type of flip chip where the underfill is applied to the wafer. This usually called (as it is here) wafer level packaging. Other than that it pretty much standard flip chip. Remember that we do not compete with flip chip but instead depend on the broad acceptance of flip chip by the industry. We offer a type of flip chip that is extremely simple and low cost. Ours is, therefore, particularly attractive to low-cost, consumable electronic applications such as Smart Labels and many, many others. You are correct: the type of flip chip you ask about requires a lot more processing steps. A Smart label application could never afford it. The key our market advantage is to match up the unmet needs (technical, cost, reliability, etc) of large, rapidly growing market segments with the cost & performance of our technology. NanoPierce has no interest in criticizing other packaging technologies. You never know who we may partner with in the future. Best regards, Herb Neuhaus -----Original Message----- From: KKnightmcc@aol.com Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:57 AM To: michael@nanopierce.com; herb@nanopierce.com Subject: New wafer level packaging technology Hi Herb and Dr. Wernle, I was wondering if you could take a look at this new Japanese wafer level processing and give me some type of comparison from your point of view. I looked at it and is appears to have more steps in processing: http://www.iep.co.jp/english/tech/index.html Thank you for your anticipated response, Kathy >>>>>>>> Hold NPCT and prosper Jetsia |
|
aus der Diskussion: | NPCT Nanopierce Technologies WKN 916132 Thread V |
Autor (Datum des Eintrages): | jetsia dax (24.10.01 16:01:29) |
Beitrag: | 123 von 329 (ID:4710683) |
Alle Angaben ohne Gewähr © wallstreetONLINE |