Fenster schließen  |  Fenster drucken

[posting]60731826[/posting]








.........................................................................................................................................................

Anna Von Reitz -- QE II and Pope Francis
6/02/2019 11:30:00 PM Anna Von Reitz, Corruption, Jesuit, The Vatican, UK

Sunday, June 2, 2019

The Big Baloney -- QE II and Pope Francis -- My Humble Suggestion

Source: Paul Stramer | By Anna Von Reitz


This morning I was treated to a parody news story from newspunch.com, announcing that Queen Elizabeth is claiming to be the 43rd great-granddaughter of the Prophet Mohammed.

She is, according to their story, trying to convince the Muslim world that she is their rightful ruler, as part of a bid to usher in global Crown Rule and perk up the oil business.
... (... :rolleyes: ... Bürgermeister von London ... Jack the Ripper ...)

It's bizarre enough to be true (not the claim to be the Prophet's progeny -- the news story) and it would neatly explain the proliferation of guillotines in America and the forced migration of Muslim people and the accompanying demands for Sharia Law.

The actual truth is that Queen Elizabeth is a criminal -- a proven criminal, and she needs to be arrested. If her own people won't do it, someone else will have to. And that will mean another bloody, senseless World War.

As a German by actual lineage, Elizabeth has about as much right to the Throne of Great Britain as I do. [I might have a little more claim than she does, because I have some Scottish Clan MacDonald blood flowing in my veins.]

So there is strike one.

She isn't a "Windsor" --- that's just an otherwise honorable name adopted because it slyly admits that she is the Prince of the Air's Purser. She occupies the same basic position as the French Payseur Family---"Wind-sur" like "Pay-sur". She's a military banker.

So there's strike two--- lying about her name and actual function.

And then there's the actual proof of criminality and Breach of Trust. In 2011 she was convicted of: (1) not having been actually seated on the Throne and (2) breaking her Coronation Oath, by a British Jury.

http://mtrial.org
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com
http://terroronthetube.co.uk/2011/05/12/muaddib-acquitted/
http://jforjustice.co.uk/77/

This is the John Anthony Hill [JAH] Case. She was tried. She was convicted by a jury in a British Court. Fair and square.

There you have strike three. ... (... “The bond between our nations was forever sealed in that “Great Crusade.” ...)

There can be no doubt that Queen Elizabeth II is in fact impersonating the Queen of Britain and has been doing so for many years.

If you could do that, why not claim to be the 43rd great-granddaughter of the Prophet Mohammed?

Interestingly, not only is Elizabeth impersonating the Queen of Great Britain, the substance of all her crimes against us and against many other people, is a form of impersonation, too.

Enfranchisement is a form of impersonation. You take a living man and you redefine him as a franchise corporation, a thing.

When goaded to arrest her, the excuses and howling from Parliament and the Privy Council amount to, "But, but.... if we did that, all the laws bearing her signature would be invalid..... if we did that, there would be no lawful Succession (there isn't anyway, but so what?)....if we did that....." And then there's, "But she is so old.....why not just let Nature take its course? Not cause any disruption of the government....."

Given her family history, she could last another fifteen years and hope to convince us all that she's Mohammed's 43rd Great-Granddaughter.

And go on signing invalid legislation affecting all her phony franchises the whole while.

It appears that the British Parliament is afflicted with the same mental illness and dearth of common sense that afflicts the "US" Congress.

They know that no law or treaty she has ever signed has any validity. They know that she is not actually the Queen and that any contract or covenant she had with the British People was severed within three days after her Coronation. They've all known that for eight (8) years, full on, in their faces, undeniable.

I guess they hope that the rest of us won't notice, but we have.

If the Queen isn't the Queen, there is no valid power of enforcement behind the British Courts, including the British Territorial Courts. Quite simply, they have no lawful or legal authority to say or do jack-diddly.

They are all caught in a nasty double-bind. If they go backward and re-instate the Land Law, which is what they should do, they will all be condemned to death under it. Yet, there has to be some kind of law or society will devolve into chaos. Enter Sharia. But even an idiot knows that isn't going to wash.

Every idiot, that is, but those in the British Parliament and Nancy Pelosi.

And while we are on that topic.... the Queen isn't the Queen, and the Pope isn't the Pope, either.

Francis is a Jesuit. Jesuits take a lifetime vow to serve the Pope. So it follows that a Jesuit can never be the Pope. Even a Lutheran knows that. So what is going on? ...

https://operationdisclosure1.blogspot.com/2019/06/anna-von-r…
 
aus der Diskussion: Devils Tower vs Trump Tower
Autor (Datum des Eintrages): teecee1  (04.06.19 21:00:18)
Beitrag: 467 von 972 (ID:60734577)
Alle Angaben ohne Gewähr © wallstreetONLINE