checkAd

    DNAG - mit großen Schritten in die Zukunft !! - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

    eröffnet am 15.11.05 14:17:29 von
    neuester Beitrag 16.11.05 22:33:35 von
    Beiträge: 13
    ID: 1.020.171
    Aufrufe heute: 0
    Gesamt: 673
    Aktive User: 0


     Durchsuchen

    Begriffe und/oder Benutzer

     

    Top-Postings

     Ja Nein
      Avatar
      schrieb am 15.11.05 14:17:29
      Beitrag Nr. 1 ()
      Vorbörsliche PR !!

      Hier entsteht pure Zukunft und keiner merkt es !!

      :)

      Compatible Technologies Target Development Drugs for Personalized Medicine
      DNAPrint(TM) genomics, Inc. (OTC BB: DNAG), a developer of genomics-based products and services, today announced that it has entered into an agreement to acquire the clinical genomics and genotyping assets of Ellipsis Biotherapeutics Corporation ("Ellipsis"), a privately held drug and diagnostic discovery company based in Toronto, Canada.

      Under terms of the agreement, Ellipsis is selling these core assets for 6,500,000 shares of DNAPrint genomics common stock. Pending completion of DNAPrint due diligence and Ellipsis shareholder approval, the transaction is expected to be completed by Nov. 30, 2005. DNAPrint will retain Ellipsis` employees, management and business operations. In addition, DNAPrint will retain the Ellipsis Biotherapeutics name and operate Ellipsis Biotherapeutics as a subsidiary of DNAPrint genomics.

      "Ellipsis has developed novel drug technologies and has spun those operations out," stated Hector J. Gomez, M.D., Ph.D., DNAPrint Chairman and Chief Medical Officer and head of its wholly owned DNAPrint Pharmaceuticals, Inc. subsidiary. "The value for DNAPrint is that Ellipsis` platform technology is highly compatible with our mission to expand our capabilities and increase our revenues."

      Richard Gabriel, DNAPrint President and Chief Executive Officer, noted that DNAPrint is actively involved in development of pharmacogenomics through in-house research, licensing agreements and the acquisition of synergistic technologies, all targeting future growth for the Company. "Our recent acquisition of Kenna Technologies, which builds computer models that mimic complex biological systems, as well as Ellipsis` synergistic gene platform applications, will broaden our capabilities and add to the growing number of products in our pipeline."

      Ellipsis is located in downtown Toronto adjacent to the academic health science complex and major teaching hospitals. Using the Beckman Coulter GenomeLab SNPstream and the Illumina Beadstation, Ellipsis performs contract SNP genotyping for academic centers, hospitals, human health care corporations and biotech companies. Its diverse services include human, plant and animal analyses.

      "We are very excited to become part of the DNAPrint group of companies," stated Dr. Laurence Rubin, Chief Executive Officer of Ellipsis. "Our core competencies provide a unique fit for the future growth and development of our contract services as well as opportunity to participate in novel research programs and collaborations."

      About DNAPrint

      DNAPrint genomics, Inc. (www.dnaprint.com) is a developer of genomics-based products and services in two primary markets: biomedical and forensics. DNAPrint Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary, develops diagnostic tests and theranostic products (drug/test combinations) using the Company`s proprietary ancestry-informed genetic marker studies combined with proprietary computational modeling technology. Computational Biology and Pharmacogenomics services are also offered externally to biopharmaceutical companies. The Company`s first theranostic product is PT-401, a "Super EPO" (erythropoietin) dimer protein drug for treatment of anemia in renal dialysis patients (end stage renal disease). Pre-clinical and clinical development of all the Company`s drug candidates will benefit from simulated pre-trials to better design actual trials and are targeted to patients with a genetic profile indicating their propensity to have the best clinical response. DNAPrint is proud of its continued dedication to developing and supplying new technological advances in law enforcement and consumer ancestry heritage interests. Please refer to www.dnaprint.com for information on law enforcement and consumer applications which include DNAWITNESS(TM), RETINOME(TM), ANCESTRYbyDNA(TM) and EURO-DNA(TM).

      Forward Looking Statements

      All statements in this press release that are not historical are forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected, including, but not limited to, uncertainties relating to technologies, product development, manufacturing, market acceptance, cost and pricing of DNAPrint`s products, dependence on collaborations and partners, regulatory approvals, competition, intellectual property of others, and patent protection and litigation. DNAPrint genomics, Inc. expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in DNAPrint`s expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such statements are based.



      Source: Market Wire (November 15, 2005 - 7:00 AM EST)

      News by QuoteMedia
      www.quotemedia.com

      :)
      Avatar
      schrieb am 15.11.05 14:31:01
      Beitrag Nr. 2 ()
      Von FCHennes entliehen :

      Form 10QSB for DNAPRINT GENOMICS INC

      15-Nov-2005

      Quarterly Report


      Item 2. MANAGEMENT`S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

      The " forward-looking statements" safe harbor does not apply to our company because we issue " penny stock" and are excluded from the safe harbor pursuant to
      Section 27A(b)(1)(C) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E(b)(1)(C) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the " Exchange Act" ). Nevertheless, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB contains forward-looking statements. In addition, from time to time, the Company or its representatives have made or may make other forward-looking statements orally or in writing. Such statements may include, without being limited to, statements concerning anticipated financial performance, future revenues or earnings, business prospects, projected ventures, new products, anticipated market performance and similar matters. The words " plan," " budget, " intend," " anticipate," " project," " estimate," " expect," " may," " might," " believe," " potential," " could," " should," " would" and similar statements are intended to be among the statements that are forward-looking statements. We caution our readers that, because such statements reflect the reality of risk and uncertainty that is inherent in doing business, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, include, but are not limited to, those set forth in the Company`s Form 10-KSB for 2004 in the Management`s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the heading " Certain Factors Which May Affect the Company`s Future Performance" which are incorporated herein by reference. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are made as of the date of this report. Except as otherwise required to be disclosed in periodic reports required to be filed by companies registered under the Exchange Act by the rules of the SEC, the Company has no duty and undertakes no obligation to update such statements.

      The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the balance sheets as of December 31, 2004 and September 30, 2005 and the financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 included with this Form 10-QSB.

      Critical Accounting Policies

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements. Some of our accounting policies require us to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Below, we discuss this further, as well as the estimates and judgments involved.

      Asset Impairment

      We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value and may not be recoverable. In performing the review for recoverability, we estimate the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized. Otherwise, an impairment loss is not recognized. Management estimates the fair value and the estimated future cash flows expected. Any changes in these estimates could impact whether there was impairment and the amount of the impairment. Since we are in the development stage, we do not have much history to determine our estimated cash flows. If we do not meet our targeted cash flows for our services and if the estimated disposition of the equipment is lower, this could result in a write-down of our equipment. Our equipment is very specialized equipment related to genomics research, and there probably will not be a large demand for our used equipment. The amount of our net fixed assets is the amount of the maximum risk if our assumptions were not correct. Each year the assets will have higher depreciation and the maximum risk will decrease correspondingly.

      Allocation of Research and Development Costs

      Prior to 2004, our research and development costs were derived by allocating certain costs based on total labor effort. The percentage of total labor effort expended on research and development was an estimate by management. During 2004, we refined our process of allocating costs by identifying and directly expensing certain costs related to research and development and allocating certain other costs based on total labor effort that is estimated by management and employees. With some of these costs, a percentage of a total purchase order price is allocated to research and development. Also during 2004, we implemented a time card process that gives us a more refined estimate of certain employees` time. During 2005, as raw materials became significant, we began recording inventory for our raw materials. As the raw materials are used, they are charged to research and development expense based upon actual usage for research and development. We continue to refine our process of identifying time associated with research and development. These refinements to estimates could increase or decrease our income statement expense categories of research and development, cost of sales and selling, general and administrative. Over time we believe this change in allocating costs will result in a lower allocation of administrative costs to research and development. Also, as we hire employees, the department in which the employee is hired will have a direct impact on the allocation of administrative costs to research and development. For example if a person is hired in research and development, the allocation to research and development for other administrative costs will increase because labor effort percentage for research and development will have increased. If a person is hired in administration, the allocation to research and development for other administrative costs will decrease because the labor effort percentage for research and development will have decreased. Changes to these estimates could have a significant impact on the accrual and related compensation expense and/or deferred compensation.

      Valuation of Goodwill

      Goodwill is reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. This annual impairment test is performed in the last quarter of each fiscal year. The goodwill impairment test requires a comparison of the fair value of the Company to the amount of goodwill recorded. If this comparison reflects impairment, then the loss would be measured as the excess of recorded goodwill over its implied fair value. Although the Company`s management believes that the estimates and assumptions used are reasonable, actual results could differ.

      Estimation of Fair Market Value

      We use the Black Scholes Option Model to determine fair market value in certain instances (i.e. to value warrants and the intrinsic value of the convertible debt and non-detachable warrants). The Black Scholes Option Model requires estimated assumptions in its computation. We estimate the assumptions used in each calculation based upon the transaction term and what we believe most appropriately reflects the transaction. If different estimates of the assumptions were used, it could result in different fair market value amounts being calculated. Additionally, various methods can be used to determine the fair market value of the warrant. If a different model were used besides the Black Scholes Option Model, it could result in different fair market value amounts being calculated.

      Summary

      Although we have been in existence for a number of years, management`s efforts to develop our business have not yet resulted in the generation of significant revenues. We have chosen to focus on increasing sales volume in the consumer and forensic markets while continuing to develop products for introduction to the pharmacogenomics market. During 2005, we added seven new distributors to sell our consumer products.

      We continue to devote substantially all of our efforts in initiating and developing our planned principal operations. We have reported that while sales of our ancestry product, ANCESTRYbyDNA(TM) and paternity services have increased compared to the prior year, sales of forensic product DNAWitness(TM) and genotyping services decreased. Our new consumer product EURO-DNA(TM) 1.0 was introduced in the marketplace in late 2004. We acquired Trace Genetics late during the second quarter which will contribute revenues during the last half of 2005. Trace Genetics brings two new complementary technologies to our autosomal testing for determining the percentage of a person`s ancestry: Y-chromosome testing for tracing ancestry by following the direct paternal line and mitochondrial (mtDNA (TM)) testing for the direct maternal line. Trace also maintains one of the largest Native American mtDNA(TM) databanks which, when combined with DNAPrint`s, will be one of the largest in North America. Other similarly large databases are controlled by groups such as the Sorensen foundation, various Native American foundations and tribes, and some Universities. Our pharmacogenomics products are still in development. Because our products are relatively new to the market, we believe that sales will continue to fluctuate from period to period until we can better determine through continued market research and experience how and where to best market and sell the products.

      Management continues to implement and refine operational procedures and controls to support future growth and development. We intend to support research and development as a vital component of our overall growth strategy. Until potential customers are familiar with our technology and products, which will come from continued research and development and proven market use, it is unlikely that we will generate significant revenue.

      Management plans to continue to focus on increasing sales in the market areas of forensics and genealogy and to move towards the introduction of new and expanded products in these markets. During July 2005, we expanded our DNAWitness(TM) product suite which now includes:

      DNAWitness(TM) 2.5 -- Tests crime scene DNA to assist detectives, forensic scientists and medical examiners in corroborating eyewitness reports and confirming suspect identities. DNAWitness(TM) 2.5 provides a BioGeographical Ancestry report that includes a photo database for reference samples of individuals. Reported ancestral origins are Sub-Saharan African, Native American, East Asian and Indo-European.

      EuroWitness(TM) 1.0 -- Tests crime scene DNA to determine more specific geographic origins if the test sample ancestry is 50% or more Indo-European. EUROWitness 1.0 provides a BioGeographical Ancestry report that includes relative percentages of Northwest European, Southeast European, Middle Eastern or South Asian.

      Retinome(TM) -- A predictive test for individual eye color from DNA. Retinome(TM) predicts eye color if the sample is 50% or greater European ancestry as to whether eye color is blue, mostly blue, brown or mostly brown. A representative eye photo database is also provided along with relevant photo database pictures of the individual references.

      STR-Witness(TM) -- A genetic " matching" used as a bar code to track and report the samples. STR-Witness(TM) is the same test used for determining an individual`s identity from an available DNA sample. Crime labs run this test to screen the Federal Bureau of Investigation`s Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) database for possible matches.

      DNAWitness-Y(TM) -- A new Y-chromosome test that determines the direct paternal ancestral lineage from the male sex chromosome. DNAWitness-Y(TM) can be used as an identification tool in cases where a mixture of male and female samples exists.

      DNAWitness-Mito(TM) -- A new mitochondrial DNA test that examines ancestral lineages along the maternal line. DNAWitness-Mito(TM) can be used as an identification tool when other DNA testing fails to yield results or the DNA sample is too deteriorated.

      We plan to continue market research within both the forensics and genealogy segments to further expand our knowledge and understanding of the most efficient way to market and sell our products.

      In our pharmacogenomics segment, we will continue work on OVANOME(TM), a Taxol screening diagnostic test, and STATINOME(TM), a test for the cardiac drug market, which are both currently under development. We will also continue our efforts on other research and development projects that are underway. Our OVANOME(TM) technology is under development with researchers at the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida, and we are in the midst of completing an initial 80 person trial under an approved IRB (Internal Review Board) which approves all clinical trial related work at the center. We are also enrolling an additional 200 subjects to further validate and support the data we obtained in our earlier trial. We will continue to explore joint venture opportunities, particularly within the pharmacogenomic segment, in order to potentially expand our position within the pharmaceutical market. A major goal of our joint venture program is to seek opportunities for a drug pipeline acquisition. Our recent licensing of a `Super` Erythropoietin (EPO) molecule from Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital (BIDMC) is a step forward in that direction. We plan to combine our ability to screen patients and track patient response to the standard form of EPO when compared to our newer, `Super EPO`. We believe this will improve our clinical efficacy and reduce the unwanted side-effects of standard EPO treatment for anemia. We plan to begin development of our new product and have GMP material ready for early stage pre-clinical development work by or during the first quarter of 2006 in accordance with our licensing agreement with BIDMC.

      Additionally, on June 7, 2005, we entered into a consulting agreement with Dr. Arthur Sytkowski, the Director of BIMDC to consult on the development of a new, more potent and longer acting form of EPO. Under the consulting agreement, Dr. Sytkowski has agreed to perform certain consulting services, including advising on medical, regulatory and patent issues, training personnel and providing assistance with EPO research and development. Also during late June, we entered into a collaborative research agreement with BIDMC to provide three researchers to us over a six-month period to conduct certain research work related to our EPO research.

      We anticipate beginning to work with clinicians at Massachusetts General Hospital for patient monitoring of standard EPO treatment of Kidney dialysis patients. Assuming we file an Investigational New Drug Application (IND) and it is approved, we hope to commence clinical studies at Massachusetts General and other centers that will be identified over time. We do not anticipate filing an IND application with the FDA during 2006. At present we are developing a manufacturing process for the PT-401 and also preparing for cGMP manufacturing of the product for pre-clinical development work. We have retained an experienced developer and manufacturer of EPO like products, and we will be advancing this development effort through the balance of this year and into 2006.

      On October 25, 2005, we entered into an exclusive Licensing Agreement (the " License" ) with Dr. Mark Froimowitz to develop a series of methylphenidate analogs or Ritalin-like compounds targeting the clinical development of enhanced pharmaceuticals for the treatment of drug addiction, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (" ADHD" ), and depression. The licensed compounds are analogs of Ritalin, a well-known drug used for treatment of ADHD. The analogs are designed specifically to have a slow onset and increased half-life in the bloodstream, thus reducing a patient`s required daily dosage and the potential for drug abuse. We have the exclusive right to develop, use, market and sell products derived from the licensed compounds.

      On October 25, 2005, we acquired all of the stock of Kenna Technologies, Inc. (" Kenna" ). Kenna develops software and related technologies for building computational models that mimic complex biological systems. We expect that Kenna`s computational models will become key components for our development of more effective therapies and diagnostic products. In acquiring Kenna, we also gain access to Kenna`s BoneFusion and CellCycleFusion models, which simulate bone remodeling processes and molecular pathways. These pathways are common targets of current cancer therapies. We exchanged 1,500,000 shares of our common stock for all the outstanding shares of Kenna. In addition, we hired certain key employees of Kenna, including Drs. Barbara Handelin and Tandy Herrin, who will support the clinical development of our PT-401 with simulations to help design optimal clinical trials.

      Internally, management will continue to develop and implement organizational policies and procedures to increase operating efficiency and move us closer to our goal of attaining and maintaining our planned principal operations.

      Our plan of operations for the ensuing twelve months includes efforts to: 1) increase sales of our existing products and services; 2) introduce new and expanded products and services in the genealogy and forensic markets; 3) continue promoting our genotyping and paternity services while continuing to concentrate on research and development for both our existing products and our anticipated pharmacogenomic products and services. We expect to add personnel in the laboratory and in administration, as growth warrants. Capital expenditures needed for the next twelve months are discussed below under the section entitled " Liquidity and Capital Resources" .

      The following discussion of our historical financial results should be read against this background.

      Results of Operations

      Three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004

      Revenues and Cost of Sales

      During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, revenues were $316,983 and $906,470 for 2005, respectively and $165,647 and $648,925 for 2004, respectively. A $151,336 increase in revenues for the third quarter from the prior period is a 91% increase while a $257,545 increase in revenues for the nine month period ending September 30, 2005 compared to the prior period is a 40% increase. In addition to the revenues recognized in the accompanying statement of operations, we also have recorded deferred revenues of $113,792 as of September 30, 2005. Deferred revenue resulted from some ANCESTRYbyDNA(TM) and EURO-DNA(TM) client testing that was not complete as of September 30, 2005. These amounts will be recognized as revenue in the fourth quarter of 2005.

      The approximately $151,000 increase in revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the same period in the prior year is mainly the result of our ANCESTRYbyDNA(TM) revenues increasing by approximately $126,000, our paternity services increasing by approximately $10,000 and EURO-DNA(TM) revenues increasing approximately $31,000 compared to the same period in the prior year. These increases are due to our increased promotion and marketing of these services. We recorded approximately $16,000 of revenues from our mtDNA(TM) product, $11,000 of revenues from our DNAWitness-Mito(TM) and $10,000 of revenues from our Y-chromosome products which were added to our product line when we acquired Trace Genetics. This was offset by a decrease of approximately $60,000 from our genotyping services and $8,000 from our DNAWitness(TM) sales. In addition, we had approximately $15,000 of other revenues.

      The approximately $258,000 increase in revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the same period in the prior year is a result of our ANCESTRYbyDNA(TM) revenues increasing by approximately $136,000, our paternity services increasing by approximately $89,000 and our EURO-DNA(TM) revenues increasing approximately $74,000 compared to the same period in the prior year. These increases are due to our increased promotion and marketing of these services. We recorded approximately $16,000 of revenues from our mtDNA(TM) product, $11,000 of revenues from our DNAWitness-Mito(TM) and $10,000 of revenues from our Y-chromosome products which were added to our product line when we acquired Trace Genetics. This was offset by a decrease of approximately $78,000 from our genotyping services and $15,000 from our DNAWitness(TM) sales. In addition, we had approximately $15,000 of other revenues.

      Paternity sales are generated primarily through our various distributors and from our website www.ancestrybydna.com. The majority of the increase in sales during 2005 compared to 2004 was from a distributor that was added during the second quarter of 2004. Paternity testing is an add-on service, and we expect revenues to continue to fluctuate in this market. While we have not yet implemented a formal marketing and sales plan for this service, we continue to perform market research and gather information in order to define and implement a formal marketing strategy. One distributor accounted for approximately $105,000 of our paternity sales during the first nine months of 2005. We do not expect these revenues to continue for the balance of the year and are working hard to replace the potential short-fall. During the third quarter and into the last quarter we will be accelerating our direct marketing and mail campaign for our ANCESTRYbyDNA(TM) and DNAWitness(TM) products and services as well as the Trace Genetics products and services.

      Genotyping sales were generated primarily through work with universities with one university being our major client of this service. The decrease of genotyping services of approximately $60,000 during the third quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 and approximately $78,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 was the result of decreased service provided to one university. To date, our genotyping service customers have come to us either through client referrals or our general website. In the future, we plan to concentrate our genotyping services on specific diseases, including cancer, neurological disorders, and heart disease. By concentrating on specific diseases, we hope to develop an expertise that will attract customers in those areas requiring external assistance and additional research capacity. One university accounted for approximately $150,000 of our genotyping sales during the first nine months of 2005.

      As part of our on-going genotyping contract services work for one of our new customers, we have offered to perform ANCESTRYbyDNA testing services on 284 children suffering from a disease known as ALL or Acute Lymphocyte Leukemia and anticipate under a joint publication agreement to submit a manuscript for publication during 2006. Following this early pre-screening, the ALL program will test nearly 3,000 children afflicted with this disease in hopes that we will be better able to help the research hospital determine the genetic markers that are inherited and that may play a role in disease formation, advancement or remission. Treatment protocols or treatment regimes include multiple drug therapies and include, Taxol and Taxol like derivatives as well as other chemotherapy treatments and protocols. It is too early to determine the potential benefits to us, but we believe that our donation of our technology and services is crucial to the development of better and improved treatments for ALL. Currently, nearly 10-20% of the children afflicted with this disorder do not survive beyond 18-24 months after diagnosis. We believe that our technology combined with the research hospital`s other work and including the contracted genotyping work performed by us for them, may help in reducing this dreadful statistic.

      We continue to market our DNAWitness(TM) product through marketing to various agencies, our attendance at trade shows and through our relationships with Lynn Peavey catalog, Orchid Biosciences, and ReliaGene Technologies. We continue to seek to develop other distributors of our services and products. During 2004, our products, DNAWitness(TM) 2.0, RETINOME, and EURO-Witness 1.0 were featured in the Lynn Peavey Company catalog and the Lynn Peavey Web site. We trained Lynn Peavey Company personnel to establish and conduct seminars and training programs for detectives, crime laboratory personnel and crime scene personnel on DNAWitness(TM). Similarly, we have trained nearly 2,000 forensic personnel that include detectives, prosecutors and forensic scientists about our technology and its use. We anticipate continuing to train personnel on the use of our technology and products throughout 2005. Because these are new products and there are no similar products being marketed, we believe that forensic revenues will continue to fluctuate as we continue to research the markets and refine our sales and marketing strategy for our products. We have identified and applied for several grants and submitted our technology for federal review for applications that include human identification and terrorist tracking. We have not experienced and do not anticipate any funding of our research and development or deployment of our technology into any of these applications in 2005. We believe that the restraint of our sales in the forensics market does not originate from a lack of desire to use the technology by the detective or the prosecutor but rather a lack of funding for the increased staff that will be required to review cold case files, open new investigations or identify missing persons from stored human remains. We believe that the bulk of our investigative support will come through local and regional police, fire and detective agencies that do not require any federal funding to use our services and technology. We will however, continue to pursue much larger applications for our technologies on a global basis and will participate in several forensic and biometric venues in the remainder of 2005 that offer us a broad platform exposure to the world market. We are also seeking distributors of our products and services on a global basis applying our technology wherever the need could arise.

      During the third quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, our sales of ANCESTRYbyDNA(TM) increased approximately $126,000. This is due to increased awareness and interest in genealogy and increased advertising during the third quarter by us in several markets. During the nine months ended 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, our sales of ANCESTRYbyDNA(TM) increased by $136,000. When we introduced our ANCESTRYbyDNA(TM) 2.5 during 2004, we increased the pricing which has resulted in a lower volume of product sold, but at a higher margin. Also, the product is relatively new to the market, and we believe sales will continue to fluctuate from period to period until we can better determine through continued market research and time how and where to best market and sell . . .

      :)
      Avatar
      schrieb am 15.11.05 14:37:44
      Beitrag Nr. 3 ()
      Sehenswert!!

      Eine deutsche Firma.

      http://www.biofrontera.com/IR/ir.html

      Schaut unter : Investoren

      DNAG ist mit 18 % Beteiligung dabei!

      Das sind schon mehr als die derzeitige MK.

      Pure Zukunft.

      :)
      Avatar
      schrieb am 15.11.05 14:41:28
      Beitrag Nr. 4 ()
      In Frankfurt und Berlin unter : A0ETWM

      Der Tagestip !

      OTCBB ist sehr risikoreich, nicht vergessen.

      :)
      Avatar
      schrieb am 15.11.05 14:42:15
      Beitrag Nr. 5 ()
      Klasse,

      jetzt haben wir mindestens 5 DNAG-Threads parallel :laugh:

      Trading Spotlight

      Anzeige
      Nurexone Biologic
      0,4360EUR +1,40 %
      InnoCan startet in eine neue Ära – FDA Zulassung!mehr zur Aktie »
      Avatar
      schrieb am 15.11.05 14:53:08
      Beitrag Nr. 6 ()
      [posting]18.824.326 von Michiko am 15.11.05 14:42:15[/posting]Dieses ist nur ein Tages-Thread.

      Weil es eben ein Tagestip ist !!

      :)
      Avatar
      schrieb am 15.11.05 15:06:20
      Beitrag Nr. 7 ()
      MK unter einer Mio. !

      http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=dnag:US

      Ich denke, nicht mehr lange.

      :)
      Avatar
      schrieb am 15.11.05 15:24:04
      Beitrag Nr. 8 ()
      Quipu

      was denkst Du, wie wir heute abend schließen?
      Avatar
      schrieb am 15.11.05 15:40:08
      Beitrag Nr. 9 ()
      Hi,

      ich denke bei 0,02.
      Morgen und die nächsten Tage werden es
      immer mehr registrieren.

      :)
      Avatar
      schrieb am 15.11.05 15:43:11
      Beitrag Nr. 10 ()
      Ich bin (aus langjähriger Erfahrung) nicht ganz so optimistisch.

      Ich befürchte, dass wir unter 0,018 bleiben werden.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 15.11.05 21:23:37
      Beitrag Nr. 11 ()
      Nicht dass es mich freuen würde . . .

      . . . aber ich glaube, ich werde Recht behalten.

      Schlusskurs vermutlich unter 0,018
      Avatar
      schrieb am 16.11.05 21:44:22
      Beitrag Nr. 12 ()
      :laugh:

      Scheint wohl noch etwas zu dauern bis der Wert erkannt wird.

      :)
      Avatar
      schrieb am 16.11.05 22:33:35
      Beitrag Nr. 13 ()
      . . . genau aus diesem Grund kann ich mit dem ständigen Hochgejubele nichts anfangen! :(


      Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben


      Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
      Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie
      hier
      eine neue Diskussion.
      DNAG - mit großen Schritten in die Zukunft !!