checkAd

    U.S. invasion responsible deaths of over 250,000 civilians in Iraq - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

    eröffnet am 03.05.06 16:12:49 von
    neuester Beitrag 03.05.06 18:58:42 von
    Beiträge: 6
    ID: 1.057.637
    Aufrufe heute: 0
    Gesamt: 616
    Aktive User: 0


     Durchsuchen

    Begriffe und/oder Benutzer

     

    Top-Postings

     Ja Nein
      Avatar
      schrieb am 03.05.06 16:12:49
      Beitrag Nr. 1 ()
      U.S. invasion responsible deaths of over 250,000 civilians in Iraq


      by John Stokes

      April 11, 2006
      www.agoracosmopolitan.com/

      Email this article to a friend
      Print this article

      New studies make the Bush administration's "liberation" argument for a 'pre-emptive' war against Iraq seem questionable.

      The invasion of Iraq in March 2003 by U.S.-led coalition forces has been responsible for the death of at least 150,000 civilians (not including certain of Iraq), reveals a compilitation of scientific studies and corroborated eyewitness testimonies.

      The majority of these deaths, which are in addition those normally expected from natural causes, illness and accidents, have been among women and children, documents a well-researched study, that had been released by The Lancet Medical Journal.

      The report in the British journal is based on the work of teams from the Johns Hopkins University and Columbia University in the U.S., and the Al-Mustansiriya University in Baghdad.

      A similar methodology was used in the late 1990's to calculate the number of deaths from the war in Kosovo, put at 10,000.

      The information was obtained as Iraqi interviewers surveyed 808 families, consisting of 7,868 people, in 33 different "clusters" or neighbourhoods spread across the country.

      In each case, they asked how many births and deaths there had been in the home since January 2002.

      That information was then compared with the death rates in each neighbourhood in the 15 months before the invasion that toppled president Saddam Hussein, adjusted for the different time frames, and extrapolated to cover the entire 24.4 million population of Iraq.

      The most common cause of death is as a direct result of a worsening 'culture of violence', mostly caused by indiscriminate U.S. co-ordinated air strikes, and related military interventions, reveals the study of almost 1000 households scattered across Iraq. And the risk of violent death just after the invasion was 58 times greater than before the war. The overall risk of death was 1.5 times more after the invasion than before.

      The on-going American Occupation has also created worsened civil strife as well as mass environmental destructions and related public health problems that is associated with American bomb-related released radioactive and other life-threatening pollutions. The American Occupation has also prevailed over the neglect to the repairing of vital public services-related infrastructure, which include U.S.-led destructions of water systems.

      The figure of 100,000 had been based on somewhat "conservative assumptions", notes Les Roberts at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, U.S., who led the study.

      That estimate excludes Falluja, :eek::eek: a hotspot for violence. If the data from this town is included, the compiled studies point to about 250,000 excess deaths since the outbreak of the U.S.-led war.

      Many Americans have complained that more than $200 billion U.S. tax dollars have been diverted from vitally needed public services in the United States, into apparently reckless activities. These activities are resulting in inflicted mass-casualities against totally innocent civilians, which have worsened conditions for political extremism, and ensuing "terrorism".

      It is well documented that such activities are being viewed by many Iraqis, and other peoples internationally, to undermine a popular feeling of international security in general. Indeed, polls suggest that Americans felt much more secure under the former political ledership of U.S. President Bill Clinton, as compared to the militaristic strategies which are being pursued by the George W. Bush administration.

      http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&c…
      Avatar
      schrieb am 03.05.06 18:03:59
      Beitrag Nr. 2 ()
      #1

      "...The most common cause of death is as a direct result of a worsening \'culture of violence\'..."

      :eek:

      Ausserdem liegt es doch hauptsächlich daran, dass die Befreiten nicht so viel Kultur und Anstand haben in Uniform zu kämpfen und nach dem Ende des Krieges ihre Waffen bei den Siegern abzugeben...
      Avatar
      schrieb am 03.05.06 18:20:10
      Beitrag Nr. 3 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 21.419.980 von Blue Max am 03.05.06 18:03:59Just another hate thread referring to a Web Site that contains plenty of conspiracy theories ...

      Das ist eben der Preis den man als Offene Gesellschaft zu zahlen hat: jeder kann jeden Dreck mit dem Anspruch auf Wahrheit verbreiten ...
      Avatar
      schrieb am 03.05.06 18:43:29
      Beitrag Nr. 4 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 21.420.196 von PresAbeL am 03.05.06 18:20:10Lieber Pres,

      Immer wieder die selbe Methode. Wenn man gegen Fakten nichts ausrichten kann, dann diffamier die Quelle.

      Die Untersuchung wurde von der Johns Hopkins University und der Columbia University durchgeführt.

      Ausserdem wurden nach derselben Methode die Toten im Kosovo hochgerechnet. Da hat sich kein Protest geregt, aber jetzt wo es um den Irak geht was ?
      Avatar
      schrieb am 03.05.06 18:44:05
      Beitrag Nr. 5 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 21.419.980 von Blue Max am 03.05.06 18:03:59Blauer Max,

      Zu deinen Postings fällt mir schon seit langem nichts mehr ein.

      Trading Spotlight

      Anzeige
      Nurexone Biologic
      0,4260EUR -0,93 %
      InnoCan startet in eine neue Ära – FDA Zulassung!mehr zur Aktie »
      Avatar
      schrieb am 03.05.06 18:58:42
      Beitrag Nr. 6 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 21.420.494 von InvestigativTrader am 03.05.06 18:43:29Immer wieder die selbe Methode. Wenn man gegen Fakten nichts ausrichten kann, dann diffamier die Quelle.

      Wie kann man gegen nicht vorhandene Fakten diffamieren wenn die Quelle per se schon eine einzige unzumutbare Diffamierung ist? :confused:


      Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben


      Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
      Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie
      hier
      eine neue Diskussion.
      U.S. invasion responsible deaths of over 250,000 civilians in Iraq