Texhoma Vergessener Wert mit unterdessen stattlicher Förderung. Viel zu billig!!! - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

[kaktus7]

Falls ich die News richtig verstanden habe liegt die tägliche Förderung bei 1015 Barrel am Tag.
mal 350 angenommene Tage un einem Preis von 60 Dollar wären das ca. 21,3 Mio Umsatz im Jahr.
Dazu eine MK von 4,5 Mio Euro

Kann das sein????

Liebe Leute, wo habe ich mich da vertan.
Wenn das alles stimmt, muss man diese Aktie kaufen!

HOUSTON, TEXAS -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 03/08/07 -- Texhoma Energy, Inc. ("Texhoma" (PINK SHEETS: TXHE) - "Peoples Energy Production", operator of the Edgerly Field, Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana, has informed Texhoma that it has completed the workover of the North American Land (NAL) #3 well. A submersible pump has been installed and production has stabilized at a rate of 320 barrels of oil per day (BOPD).

On January 16, 2007 the Company reported that the NAL #4 well was producing 30 BOPD after a workover. That rate has steadily increased since our last release and now the well is producing at a stabilized rate of 83 BOPD.

Texaurus Energy, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Texhoma, owns an 11.76% working interest in the Edgerly Field which has four producing wells. The Field is now producing 550 BOPD (gross).

Mr. Maxwell, President and CEO, commented that the workovers were a success and expectations are that production of the NAL #3 well will further improve over the next couple of weeks. Already with 65 BOPD net to the Company the sales revenue on a monthly basis is about $ 120,000 from the Edgerly Field alone.

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 28.199.101 von kaktus7 am 09.03.07 10:45:06

ehrlich gesagt erschließt sich mir die verdienstlage nicht, ausser dass, wie bei dir, bei mir der eindruck besteht, dass verdient wird und die aktie unterbewertet ist.
dummerweise lief vor kurzem diese unsägliche pushaktion, die sicher manchen abhält, texhoma zu kaufen.
als zweites hängt die citigroup drin, die nicht nur meinen vermutungen nach als aggressive Leerverkäuferin auftritt (nicht nur bei texhoma) und bei der derzeitigen chartsituation weiter drücken kann, auch, wenn ich die zahl richtig erinnere, weil das tägliche kaufvolumen unter ca. 45.000 shares liegt (darüber + die konstellation der 200 und 38 tage-linien würde wohl ein kaufsignal generieren)
insofern hat die citigroup ordentlich verdient, bedenkt man das höhere kursniveau von über 12 ct. zuletzt (ich will keine beabsichtigten zusammenhänge der pushaktion und des tiefen falls herstellen)
falls vermehrt käufer auftreten sollten, kann natürlich über die shorteindeckung der kurs rasch nach oben springen, aber wer hat die möglichkeiten die über 40% der leerverkauften aktien (alleine von der citigroup) zu egalisieren?
so kann der kurs, auch bei guter verfassung von texhoma demnächst zwei nullen hinter dem komma aufweisen, gutes geld für die citigroup und andere geldhäuser.
wenn die aktie nicht von strategischen einkäufern entdeckt wird bleibt sie meiner meinung nach ein spielball nach unten.
ich lasse meine anteile liegen und warte auf die entdeckung gepaart mit einer shorteindeckung.
so long, roback

[kaktus7]

Können denn Leerverkäufer den Kurs einer gutgehenden Firma dauerhaft unten halten???
Oder ist eine vielmehr eine Gelegenheit billig an Aktien zu kommen die irgenwann steigen werden, weil es immer Leute gibt, die auf der Suche nach unterbewerteten Firmen sind.
Ich versuche jedenfalls welche zu kriegen, da man, meiner Meinung nach, höchsten 2,5 Cent verlieren kann, aber durchaus das mehrfache gewinnen. Den Jahresumsatz sollte doe Firma auf jedenfall wert sein. (Umsatz ca 21 Mio Dollar, MK 4.5 Mio =>
kann sich jeder selber ausrechnen, was das bedeutet)

[roback]

wohl nicht, aber gedrückt wird, solange nichts nach oben geht, sprich schlicht und einfach keine massiven käufe da sind, läßt sich an vielen charts von pinksheets ablesen, steile kurze kerzen und dann über lange zeit hin zu drei nullen hintern komma..
kann nur hoffen, dass texhoma wirklich verdient und entdeckt wird..

[Westfahle69]

Wieviel Aktien haben die den inmoment auf dem Markt ?

[kaktus7]

181 Mio

[roback]

die wahrscheinlichkeit für eine shorteindeckung wurde mit etwas über 80% angegeben,

wir haben darüber geredet und schon passiert es, allerdings bleibt ffm unbeeindruckt, der faire kurs läge bei 0,031

aber immerhin mal volumen..

[kaktus7]

Es gibt 2 Entwicklungen zu beobachten.
1. Der Kurs ist immer mehr gefallen und hat meiner Meinung nach seinen Tiefpunkt erreicht.
2. Texhoma fördert immer mehr und verdient damit auch mehr Geld.

Diese beiden Entwicklungen widersprechen sich.
Irgenwann werden immer mehr Leute erkennen, wie sehr TXHE unterbewertet ist, und dann

Wenn man bedentk, dass einige bei WO bei Ölfirmen ein KUV von 5 für eine prima Sache halten...
TXHE hat einen KUV von ca 0,22
Da muss einfach irgendwann bald was geschehen

habe mich noch zu 0.025 etwas eindecken können.

[pokajoke]

habe mir auch noch Teile sichern können, bevor die noch schlafende Texhoma erwacht. Das Ding kann nur in eine Richtung maschieren (Norden), da wie schon erwähnt, bereits produziert wird und Geld in die kassen fließen.
Es stehen ja noch weitere Projekte an, die kurz vor der Vollendung stehen.
Nur ein B.s.: Sandy-Point, werden diese Woche positive News erwartet und da geht es um 500.000 Barell Öl + Gas(seismische Messungen belegen das Vorkommen).Clovelly soll auch noch dieses Quartal kommen (11 Mio. Barell Öl+Gas).

Also was soll hier noch schief gehen

[AnderlM]

von der angebenen produktionsmenge bzw. vom revenue gehören texhoma 5,84 %; nachzulesen auf deren homepage unter "projekte". sie haben seit ewigkeiten keinen aktuellen quartalsbericht mehr abgegeben......

viel spass noch!

[Michi76]

Glaubt Ihr wirklich, dass der Kurs demnächst steigen wird?

Welche Kurszuwächse sind Eurer Meinung nach in den nächsten Wochen bzw. Monaten drin?

Hab mir heute mal zum Spaß 10 k zu 0,027 ins Depot gelegt.

[pokajoke]

News

Die Firma produziert an allen Ecken und keiner bemerkt es.

MARCH 21, 2007 - 09:02 ET

Texhoma Energy, Inc.: Second Successful Recompletion at Intracoastal City Field

HOUSTON, TEXAS--(CCNMatthews - March 21, 2007) - Texhoma Energy, Inc. ("Texhoma") (PINK SHEETS:TXHE) has been informed by Key Operating Company that the "SL 16995 No. 3" well in the Intracoastal City Field, Vermilion Parish, Louisiana, has been successfully recompleted. The gas field, also known as the Little White Lake property, was producing from three wells before two wells started to produce too much water with the gas in the third quarter of 2006.

The No. 3 well was successfully recompleted in the Lower Polaris Sand at a depth of 12,514 feet and produced at a rate of 44 barrels of condensate (oil) and 1.5 million cubic feet of gas per day.

On February 26, 2007 we reported that the SL 16995 #1 was also successfully recompleted. Since recompletion this well has maintained its production with a slight increase and is now producing 157 barrels of condensate per day and 965 thousand cubic feet of gas per day.

With this production increase the Company now produces the total equivalent of 130 barrels of oil per day from three separate fields with an estimated net cashflow of $240,000 per month.

The 8% working interest in the Intracoastal City Field was acquired by Texaurus Energy, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Texhoma, in April 2006 together with holdings in the Barnes Creek Gas Field and Edgerly Oil Field.

Safe Harbor Statement: "This News Release may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and section 21E of the United States Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to corporate objectives, projections, estimates, operations, acquisition and development of various interests and certain other matters. These statements are made under the "Safe Harbor" provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and involve risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements contained herein." The Company takes no obligation to update or correct forward-looking statements and also takes no obligation to update or correct information prepared by third parties that is not sanctioned by the Company.

Was kann man da noch falsch machen???
Die Kursrichtung ist vorgegeben und zwar nach Norden

[kaktus7]

Ich war wohl ganz am Anfang zu optimistisch.
Es scheint so, als ob die gesamte Firma Einnahmen on ca 240.000$ im Monat hat, als 2.880.000$ im Jahr.

With this production increase the Company now produces the total equivalent of 130 barrels of oil per day from three separate fields with an estimated net cashflow of $240,000 per month.

Wenn das wirklich alles ist, dann ist es nicht gerade viel, aber angesichts der MK ganz ok.
Weiss jemand, ob da noch Umsatz woanders her kommt?

[pokajoke]

na das ist doch ein Anfang oder
Texhoma ist noch am Sandy-Point und clovelly beteiligt. Sandy-Point soll in den nächsten Tagen fertig sein. Geschätzes Vorkommen: 500.000 Barell Öl + Gas. Clovelly soll 2 Quartall 07 fertig sein. Geschätztes Vorkommen ca. 11 Mio. Barell Öl + Gas.

Bis demnächst

[roback]

behalte ich wohl (leider) recht. wie es aussieht geht der wert dahin wo er entstanden ist, der weg aller otcbb werte:
0,001 cent, dann rs und wieder kurs auf 0,001.

[pokajoke]

hier News von MXXR, das ist die Partnerfirma, die genau wie Texhoma am Sandy-Point beteiligt ist.

LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA--(MARKET WIRE)--Mar 27, 2007 -- Matrixx Resource Holdings, Inc. (OTC BB:MXXR.OB - News) announced today that the Fite No. 3 well at Sandy Point is drilling at 3,876 feet.
ADVERTISEMENT


The Company has been notified by the operator that, as of early this morning, drilling has reached a depth of 3,876 feet. Drilling began Friday, March 23 and is expected to take approximately 10 days to reach the target depth of 7,000 feet. Upon reaching target depth, the well will be logged, and should there be a discovery, completed. This process will take an additional few days.

The Sandy Point Field, located in Brazoria County, was discovered in 1937, and 60 acres yielded 665,000 BO from the 2nd Frio sand. Also, in the nearby W. Sandy Point Field, the Shepperd No.1 Fite has produced 250,000 BO, and 150 MMCFG, from the 1st and 2nd and 3rd Frio sands.

The Express No.1 Fite re-established production in Sandy Point Field in 2002. The 1st Frio sand has gas-on-oil and the 2nd Frio sand (the main pay in Sandy Point Field) has good oil shows in cuttings and sidewall cores.

3-D Seismic, along with well control, confirm that the Express well discovered a new, productive structure. However, the No. 1 Fite well is located low or flankish on the structure. The objective of the Fite No. 3 well is to drill to the 6,700 to 7,000 depth and find structural advantage on the order of magnitude of 10\' to 20\' over the No. 1 well. The results should be a 1st Frio gas sand of 10\' net pay thickness, and 2nd Frio oil sand of 10\' net pay thickness. The recoverables attributable to such a development well are estimated to be 0.4 BCFG and 500,000 BO.

Wenn das so weiterläuft, dann müssten am Montag die Ergebnise auf dem Tisch liegen.

[kaktus7]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 28.533.677 von pokajoke am 28.03.07 06:10:53

Vielen Dank für die Info.

Dann wollen wir mal hoffen, dass da unten ordentlich was zu holen ist.

[pokajoke]

Morgen Leute,

Dienstag muss es soweit sein, da werden die Bohrergebnise von Sandy-Point vorliegen. Da geht es nicht mehr darum ob man Öl gefunden hat, sondern wieviel.
Seismische Messungen haben Ölvorkommen bestätigt.
Also auf eine grüne Woche

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 28.616.515 von pokajoke am 02.04.07 06:42:20

gerne, bin mit meinem (zweck)pessimismus vom 27.03. darauf eingestimmt...

[roback]

26€ umsatz ???

wer hatte hier denn bedarf an parkmünzen ???

[pokajoke]

Sandy-Point war ein Fehlschlag. Aber bei nur 10% Beteiligung ist das nicht der Weltuntergang.
Sie sind gerade dabei Clovelly und Manville vorzubereiten. Man erinnert sich an Clovelly, als die erste Bohrung wegen zu hohen Gasdruck im Brunnen abgebrochen wurde. Also hier ist man schon fündig geworden. Man schätzt den Nutzen des Gases auf 35Mio.$. Der Hauptanteil ist aber das Ölvorkommen mir geschätzten 11Mio.-Barell.
Es muß bald die News kommen, wann damit wieder gestartet wird.
Also auf rosige Zeiten, denn wenn die News kommen, dann bekommt man die Aktie für den momentanen Kurs nicht mehr.

[pokajoke]

hay Leute,

habt ihr schon den Bericht von Texhoma gelesen?? Die wollen mit MXXR zusammengehen.
Wenn das stimmt, dann geht wieder was

ITEM 1.01 ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT.



On or about May 15, 2007, Texhoma Energy, Inc. (“we,” “us,” and the “Company”) entered into a Letter Agreement with Matrixx Resource Holdings Inc. (“Matrixx”) to sell its 11% working interest in the property known as the Clovelly Prospect (the “Clovelly Prospect”) for $150,000. In connection with and pursuant to the Letter Agreement, we expect to receive an earnest money deposit of $25,000 on or about May 25, 2007. The deposit is not refundable to Matrixx unless there are significant title defects in connection with the Clovelly Prospect which cannot be cured, regardless of whether Matrixx moves forward with the purchase.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Letter Agreement anticipates the closing the purchase of the Clovelly Prospect to close on or before June 30, 2007, at which time the remainder of the purchase price shall be paid by Matrixx. The effective date of the purchase will be May 22, 2007.


We are also currently in the process of finalizing a Management Services Agreement, and a Joint Venture agreement, and forming a separate Joint Venture company, which agreements and which Joint Venture company have not been finalized to date.


ITEM 5.02 DEPARTURE OF DIRECTORS OR PRINCIPAL OFFICERS; ELECTION OF DIRECTORS; APPOINTMENT OF PRINCIPAL OFFICERS


At a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company on May 17, 2007, the Board of Directors appointed Frank Jacobs, the Company’s current Director and the former Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of the Company, as Chief Executive Officer. Additionally at the meeting of the Board of Directors, the Directors recommended that William “Mike” Simmons be appointed as a Director of the Company to fill a vacancy on the Board, which appointment has not yet been accepted by Mr. Simmons as of the filing of this report.


William “Mike” Simmons, age 53, currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Valeska Energy Corp., which position he has held since June, 2006, and as President of Loosbrock Offshore International, Inc., which position he has held since April 1987, and which company is engaged in the offshore drilling industry as a consultant and broker. From June 2005 until May 2006, Mr. Simmons served as Senior Editor and leader of the energy group for Off The Record Research, LLC, a registered investment advisor and broker dealer firm.


Mr. Simmons obtained his Bachelors degree from Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas in Geography in 1980.

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 29.496.695 von pokajoke am 28.05.07 10:55:35

die nachricht stammt vom 15.05.2007

der kurs ist in der folge in der spitze um 50% eingebrochen.

warum?

auf jeden fall eine nachricht die was bewegt hat aber nicht zu meiner freude.

erklären kann ich mir die bewegung nicht, vom volumen her
10.000 dollar, ist ja auch nicht die welt...

raus um jeden preis?
oder nach wie vor die citigroup, die bis 0,001 cent shortet?

[roback]

führen mal eben eine kapitalerhöhung durch, schmeissen rund 23 mill. neue aktien raus, für 1,25 cent das stück und unsereiner wundert sich, warum der kurs in den keller rauscht...
nun denn, der bart ist ab, alle die, die diese neuen aktien bekommen haben, haben natürlich einen enormen schnitt gemacht, angefangen bei über 10 cent zu verkaufen...
jetzt bleibt allerdings die chance, dass das papier auch mal wieder steigt..

[roback]

tatsächlich, sie steigt wieder, mehr als 100% in 5 handelstagen, leider nur in den usa, das ertse kursziel heißt 4 cent, danach 8 cent, dieses jahr noch, dann erinnert man sich auch wieder an diesen wert...

[Mr.Bean]

man schlaft Ihr?

TH in 0,07 in USA

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.077.448 von Mr.Bean am 20.06.07 17:15:58

erstes kursziel angeschnitten..

schlafen tut auf jeden fall der makler in ffm, 1,5 cent!, nicht zu fassen

[OilDragon]

Hallo Leute,

hier ist etwas ganz interessantes von DRÜBEN !!

Zur Erklärung Texhoma ist eine Tochterfirma von Texaurus !!

Wenn Texhoma seine Rechte an Clovelly verliert, sind Texhoma sowie auch Texaurus so gut wie BANKROTT !!
Denn Texsaurus und somit auch Texhoma haben 8,5 Millionen Dollar SCHULDEN bei LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD, welche in Jährlichen Raten a 10,25% der Gesamtsumme ab 29 November 2006 zu zahlen sind !!

Ich will nicht vorgreifen, den Rest könnt Ihr aus dem Berich weiter unten entnehmen !!



Clovelly, TXHE, Laurus Master Fund, and MXXR

For the record, I restate my assertion that MXXR's and TXHE Clovelly "deal" was solely for Bargaining Purposes. TXHE needs the revenue from Clovelly as much as MXXR

The 28-Feb-2007 10QSB/A discloses a signficant venture capital investment: "On March 28, 2006 (the "Closing"), Texaurus entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement ("Securities Purchase Agreement") with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. ("Laurus"); a Registration Rights Agreement with Laurus ("Registration Rights Agreement"); issued Laurus a Common Stock Purchase Warrant (the "Texaurus Warrant"); entered into a Master Security Agreement with Laurus; sold Laurus a Secured Term Note in the amount of $8,500,000 (the "Note"), and entered into various other agreements described below. Additionally, in connection with the Closing, we issued Laurus a Common Stock Purchase Warrant (the "Texhoma Warrant")..." [2]


The 10QSB/A reports that TXHE used the proceeds of this deal with Laurus to buy an interest in the Edgerly field. "On March 28, 2006, with an effective date of January 1, 2006, Texaurus closed a Sales & Purchase Agreement to purchase certain interests in the Barnes Creek gas field and the Edgerly field from Kilrush Petroleum, Inc. Texaurus paid the $5,225,000 purchase price with proceeds received from its sale of the Secured Term Note with Laurus."


The Laurus investment came with strings attached. The 10QSB/A states that the Laurus investment took the form of a note - i.e. a loan. The 10QSB/A states: "In connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement, Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. ("Laurus"), purchased a $8,500,000 Secured Term Note from Texaurus, which bears interest at the rate of 10.25% per year (as of November 29, 2006), which is due and payable on March 27, 2009, and which principal is repayable by way of a production payments equal to 80% of the gross production revenue received by Texaurus in connection with the Intracoastal City Field, the Edgerly and the Barnes Creek Properties." [3]


It is an open question whether TXHE will be able to repay the Laurus note. The current revenue stream does not appear to be sufficient. According to the 10QSB/A:

"In connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement, Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. ("Laurus"), purchased a $8,500,000 Secured Term Note from Texaurus, which bears interest at the rate of 10.25% per year (as of November 29, 2006), which is due and payable on March 27, 2009, and which principal is repayable by way of a production payments equal to 80% of the gross production revenue received by Texaurus in connection with the Intracoastal City Field, the Edgerly and the Barnes Creek Properties."

"There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient funds to pay any principal or interest on the Note when due on March 27, 2009, if such repayment amount is not sufficiently covered by the payment of production proceeds to Laurus, as described above. If we do not have sufficient funds to pay the total remaining amount of the Note (after taking into account payments of principal, which we may not have sufficient funds to pay) when due, we will be in default and Laurus may take control of substantially all of our assets (as described in more detail under "Risks Relating to the Company's Securities"). As a result, we will need to raise or otherwise generate approximately $8,500,000 to repay the Note (not including any adjustments for payment of principal in connection with production payments paid by Texaurus) by March 27, 2009. If we fail to raise this money, we could be forced to abandon or curtail our business operations."


In connection with this investment by Laurus, it appears that Jacobs put more of his own money into the company. "Frank Jacobs, our Executive Chairman and one of our Directors, and the President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Texaurus provided $300,000 of personal funding to Texaurus in connection with the funding, by way of a subscription for 7,500,000 shares of our common stock at $0.04 per share."[4] The fact that an insider is apparently putting more of his own hard cash into the company could suggest confidence that management does have a realistic hope of turning this company around.


The currently claimed revenue stream is about $2.88MM per year. 80% of that belongs to Laurus or about $2.3MM per year. (Note that this leaves only about $500K in cashflow to be retained by the company.) The Laurus note is due in March 2009. Two years of revenue off the existing production will only cover about half of the debt to Laurus. Presumably the insiders at TXHE are not stupid. Presumably the folks at Laurus aren't stupid either. The insiders have stuck with this company for quite some time even in the face of no revenue at all until now. They must have some plan for covering the other $4MM.



MfG
OilDragon

[OilDragon]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.305.657 von OilDragon am 25.06.07 13:50:38

Form 8-K for MATRIXX RESOURCE HOLDINGS, INC.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

28-Jun-2007

Other Events



Item 8.01 Other Events.
A. Manvel Agreement

On August 28, 2006, the Registrant, a Delaware corporation ("Matrixx" or the "Company"), reached an agreement with Texhoma Energy, Inc. ("Texhoma") for the acquisition of a majority working interest in two wells located in Brazoria County, Texas (the "Manvel Agreement"). Pursuant to the terms of the Manvel Agreement, the Company was to receive a 55% working interest in the Manvel 2,000 ft. Miocene Exploration prospect for $20,000 and a 55% working interest in the Manvel 4,500 ft. Oakville Development well for $40,000.

Payment was made and closing of the Manvel transaction occurred November 2006. Subsequently, the Company conveyed a 10% working interest in the Manvel wells back to Texhoma as partial payment for a 10% participation in the Sandy Point Prospect. Currently, the Company has yet to receive the operating agreement, assignment, or any additional documentation pertaining to such agreement. Matrixx has been seeking remedy to this transaction.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Clovelly Agreement

On May 21, 2007, the Registrant reached an agreement in principal with Texhoma for the acquisition of an eleven percent interest in the Clovelly Prospect. At the request of Texhoma the terms and conditions of the "Agreement" were to be treated as confidential, and were to be released subsequent to prior written approval, except as may be required by law. Payment by Matrixx to Texhoma on this transaction has yet to occur.

C. Manvel and Clovelly Agreements

Currently, both parties are working diligently to address the aforementioned transactions. The Company's position is to concurrently resolve both the Manvel and Clovelly agreements with Texhoma on a mutual basis.

Item 9.01 Exhibits.

10.4 Acquisition and Participation Agreement between Company and Texhoma Energy, Inc., dated August 28, 2006.

10.5 Letter Agreement between Company and Texhoma Energy, Inc. dated May 15, 2007

http://biz.yahoo.com/e/070628/mxxr.ob8-k.html

[OilDragon]

Hallo Leute,

etwas von DRÜBEN !!


Why make a payment if TXHE stole the money on manveil. If someone took your money and then asked you for more would you send it?

Kudos for not being hoodwinked twice. Maybe that is why txhe management all resigned.


Texhoma took the money but didnt cough up the asset. That sounds like fraud on texhomas part. This is why I see texhoma management change.

Manvel Agreement

On August 28, 2006, the Registrant, a Delaware corporation (“Matrixx” or the “Company”), reached an agreement with Texhoma Energy, Inc. (“Texhoma”) for the acquisition of a majority working interest in two wells located in Brazoria County, Texas (the “Manvel Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Manvel Agreement, the Company was to receive a 55% working interest in the Manvel 2,000 ft. Miocene Exploration prospect for $20,000 and a 55% working interest in the Manvel 4,500 ft. Oakville Development well for $40,000.

Payment was made and closing of the Manvel transaction occurred November 2006. Subsequently, the Company conveyed a 10% working interest in the Manvel wells back to Texhoma as partial payment for a 10% participation in the Sandy Point Prospect. Currently, the Company has yet to receive the operating agreement, assignment, or any additional documentation pertaining to such agreement. Matrixx has been seeking remedy to this transaction.



MfG
OilDragon

[OilDragon]

Hallo Leute,


hier ist etwas von DRÜBEN !!


Die Leitung von TXHE alles Lügner ??


Fliegt schon bald der ganze Schwindel auf ??


xxxxxxxxxxx,



We have been trying to resolve this Manvel matter with them the last few months. As you know, we sent them $60,000 in cash and they seem to can’t get their act together. Now new management at Texhoma seems to can’t find the information pertaining to it, even after we continue to send them all the papers. There is a $100,000 lien on Texhoma’s Clovelly interest. So until they return our $60,000 for Manvel, and pay the lien so the property can be transferred, we are not confident that $25,000 sent to them today will do anything but go into a black hole. We have offered to pay the lien directly to the lien holder, but Texhoma has declined that, which to us doesn’t sound as if they are acting on good faith. To be fair, I really think the new Texhoma management team has a lot of loose ends to fix and this is one of them. The seem sincere in their efforts to resolve it, but again until then, it doesn’t seem fair to send more cash when they cannot at this time account for our past cash sent to them.



xxxxxxxxxx


Das wird ein Fest !!



MfG
OilDragon

[pokajoke0]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.379.553 von OilDragon am 28.06.07 23:17:27

mir reichts jetzt, ich steige aus.
Texhoma ist mir zu undurchsichtig geworden. Jetzt bekomm ich noch was für meine Aktien, später..... wer weiß...

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.379.553 von OilDragon am 28.06.07 23:17:27

solche schreiben kann ich nicht beurteilen.
ob z.b. sap oracle ausspioniert hat oder nicht, wer weiß.

wenn bei texhoma dinge schief liegen, dann wird sich das herausstellen.

was ich zumindest lese ist, dass das neue management bemüht ist, mit den partnern vergangene dinge zu klären.

aber was ich nicht verstehe ist:

warum wird das ein fest?? sehe ich da 11 lachende, in der Vorfreude auf irgendeine, möglicherweise schadenfreude??

lust am möglichen schaden anderer?

na ja, du wirst mich aufklären.

gruß, roback

[OilDragon]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.389.006 von roback am 29.06.07 11:49:05

Hallo roback,

ja es ist Vorfreude, aber keine Lust am möglichen Schaden anderer !!

Es ist, weil TXHE in seinem 8-K/A Bericht den mit MXXR geschlossenen Vertrag an den 11% von Clovelly mit der Begründung der nicht geleisteten Zahlung von 25.000 auflöst !!

Man überlege sich diese Dreistigkeit von TXHE, Sie haben bei MXXR noch 60.000 Schulden und lösen einen Vertrag mit MXXR wegen nicht geleisteter Zahlung von 25.000 auf !!
Bei solch einem Firmen Management kann einem Angst und Bange werden, hoffendlich vergessen Sie nich, dass Sie eine Aktiengesellschaft sind und die Aktionäre am Gewinn beteiligt sind !!

Ich habe sofort nachdem ich davon erfuhr das Management von TXHE um eine Stellungnahme gebeten, als ich nach der 14 Anfrage immer noch keine Antwort hatte, habe ich meine 5 Millionen Anteile verkauft !!


MfG
Oildragon

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.394.444 von OilDragon am 29.06.07 16:15:42

wer weiß, was da für verträge abgeschlossen worden sind.., z.b. könnte sehr wohl ein betrag einseitig fällig werden, auch wenn insgesamt eine schuld besteht.., also erst mal abwarten, ob es sich hier um dreistigkeit handelt oder um auslegungen eines vertrages.

kann aufgrund deiner antwort erkennen, dass sich die vorfreude auf einen möglichen crash bei texhoma bezieht, den ich allerdings noch nicht sehe.

aber eins interessiert mich brennend, wie bist du 5 millionen shares losgeworden?? in amiland??

habe ich dir etwa einen teil abgekauft??

so denn, wir werden sehen, ich für meinen teil würde mich auf jeden fall über steigende kurse freuen, auch ein fest, auch für alle die, die noch investiert sind.

gruß, roback

[roback]

läuft im moment nach plan:

die letzten tage an 4 us-cent gescheitert und ordentlich verkauft... heute abverkauf und erneuter angriff auf die 4 us-cent....
vielleicht heute mit dem schluss gehalten, nächstes kursziel 8 us-cent

in ffm bleibt der makler bescheiden und gekauft wird wahrscheinlich auch erst, wenn der kurs noch weiter steigt...

so denn,


gruß roback

[roback]

+ 125% aktuell, kurs 7 us-cent, allerdings kleinere umsätze in der spitze.

über 4 us-cent schließen wäre mein wunsch für heute, danach sehe ich sehr optimistisch die 8 us-cent

der makler in ffm hat auch nachgezogen, allerdings inakzeptabel, über 100% unterm otcbbkurs !

[roback]

in der spitze die 8 us-cent erreicht, so denn, sie werden demnächst fallen, das nächste kursziel dann 10 us-cent + x

8 us-cent übrigens knapp 6 eurocent (wie ihr wißt), kurs in ffm bei 2 eurocent (??!?)

[roback]

eieiei, was für ein kursgehüpfe..., aber hauptsache die 4 hält,
we´ll see, sonst behält oildragon recht und feiert ein fest..

[roback]

schade, sah ganz gut aus, da kann man schon mal euphorisch werden..

unter 4 cent wieder, allerdings mit miniumsätzen, das gros ging nach oben..

so denn, der anleger bleibt mal wieder sich selbst überlassen..

[pokajoke0]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.529.019 von roback am 06.07.07 21:50:37

was geht hier ab, das ist doch nicht mehr normal!!!!
Diese Schwankungen sind doch gemacht oder???

Also mein Misstrauen wächst von Tag zu Tag.

[roback]

dafür noch eine kleinigkeit, im gegensatz zu den 14 anfragen dragonoils brauchte diese anfrage heute nicht mal eine stunde bis eine antwort da war:

> Dear Mr.Simmons,
>
> only one question brings me to write you:
>
> some german sharholders wanted to know, if there is contact to you
possible. The background is, one of them said, he had very often started to
contact you, but never received an answer, so he completely sold his shares
with great disappointment.
> Other ones think about to follow because they lost their confidence to
you, also they think there are inconsistencies in things with money because
of clovely and manvel.
> So you can do a lot for the confidence of your shareholders by answering.
>
> a lot of greetings


Please see my contact information below. I am happy to answer any questions
you may have to the extent I am able to do so. I would like to point you
toward the 8K filings that have been recently made by the company. Within
these filings, there is much information about what is going on with the
company.


http://finance.yahoo.com/q?d=t&s=TXHE.PK

Kind Regards,

Mike Simmons
President

TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC.
100 Highland Park Village
Suite 200
Dallas, Texas 75205

P 214.295.3380
F 214.853.5116
C 713.446.8718

wer also ebenfalls fragen hat, nichts wie los..

insgesamt war der kursverlauf recht aufregend, auch wenn für mich enttäuschend am ende.
dennoch bin ich optimistisch, da das absinken des kurses am ende nur mit kleinen verkaufstranchen zu sehen ist, mehr als 300% volatilität an einem tag.., da kann man schon mal mit gutem gewinn aussteigen, auch gibt es noch investierte, die bei 1,2 cent zugeschlagen haben, bzw. eingestiegen waren..

schönes we,

roback

[pokajoke0]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.529.394 von roback am 06.07.07 22:10:52

echt super, dass du mit Texhoma in Kontakt getreten bist.
Aber mal ehrlich, diese Antwort sagt soviel wie gar nichts. Das ist doch so ein allgemein Gerede oder????

Ich bleibe dabei, irgendwas stimmt hier nicht, diese Kursschwankungen wie am Freitag lassen bei mir sämtliche Alarmglocken läuten.

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.561.637 von pokajoke0 am 08.07.07 10:33:37

sicher sagt die antwort nur, dass er fragen beantworten würde, das filing das er anspricht kennen wir schon, aber:

meine absicht war einzig und allein zu erfahren, ob jemand antwortet und das ist geschehen, was für mich erst mal ein mindestmaß an vertrauen schafft, also kann jeder unter der angegebenen adresse fragen, falls er fragen hat

so denn, falls ich weitere fragen habe, werde ich auch fragen, allerdings, du hast es gesagt, ich erwarte keine aussagekräftigen antworten.

die kursentwicklung ist komplizierter als ich dachte und erstmal das einzige was mich interessiert, aussagen dazu werde ich mit sicherheit nicht erhalten, von daher bin ich gespannt, wie die nächsten wochen sich entwickeln.

so long, roback

[Blindgaenger2]

na ja.

Interessant ist Texhoma allemal...... bei den steigenden Ölpreisen.....
Wenn die die 11% an Clovelly behalten, ist da mächtig potential drin. Wenn nicht. Dann denke ich wird es eher ein Flop.

Roback

zwei Fragen die ich hätte.......

Was ist mit den 11% an Clovelly?
und wann fangen die an zu bohren?

Es wäre sinnvoll, wenn du für uns alle an Simmons schreiben würdest. Wenn jeder einzelne von uns schreibt, gibt es doch wahrscheinlich ein ziemliches Durcheinander.....
das hat man ja bei Oildragon gesehen... ich hab nur zweimal geschrieben und auch keine Antwort bekommen......

Also wäre es sinnvoll wie von mir vorgeschlagen.....
Was meint ihr alle dazu?

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.587.860 von Blindgaenger2 am 09.07.07 10:26:31

guter vorschlag, bin einverstanden, allerdings

wäre mir sehr geholfen, wenn ihr mir die fragen schon, so weit möglich, vorübersetzt, auch solche fragen, was ist mit den 11%.., sollten präzisiert werden, damit eine möglichst genaue antwort erfolgen kann.

ich schreibe an texhoma, dass wir hier fragen sammeln und ich sie demnächst an herrn simmons weiterleite.

am besten ihr postet sie direkt an mich, sagen wir, bis dienstag abend 20 Uhr?? und ich versuche mein/unser glück, antworten zu erhalten.

würde mich freuen, wenn möglichst viele fragen zusammen kämen.

gruß roback

[roback]

Dear Mr. Simmons,

thanks for writing.

We are collecting questions to you until tuesday evening.
So it would be very kind of you to answer the following days.

We read already the 8k filings from 06/11 as possible as we can read, so there are still some open questions.

Have a nice day and a good work, until wednesday!


also los, her mit den fragen...

gruß roback

[Blindgaenger2]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.591.341 von roback am 09.07.07 13:42:35

hört sich gut an

Werde mal ne Frage bis Morgen formulieren

Danke für dein Angebot

[roback]

fragen sind abgeschickt, bei antwort erscheinen demnächst hier..

[Blindgaenger2]

[OilDragon]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.623.129 von roback am 10.07.07 22:17:54

Hallo roback,

wenn Du Fragen bezüglich Clovelly oder Manvel gestellt hast, wirst Du keine Antwort bekommen !!

Denn Fragen zu Clovelly und Manvel kommen zur Zeit bei TXHE nicht so gut an !!

Jede andere Frage werden Sie Dir gerne beantworten !!



MfG
OilDragon

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.640.169 von OilDragon am 11.07.07 20:59:21

in der tat, eine antwort steht noch aus.

vielleicht behältst du am ende recht.

auch der kursverlauf läßt doch sehr zu wünschen übrig nach diesen exorbitanten schwankungen. vielleicht werden die zu 1,2 cent erworbenen aktien schon versilbert.

aber noch bin ich nicht so weit, ein wenig zeit habe ich schon mitgebracht.

schönen abend dir, roback

[Blindgaenger2]

schau ma einfach mal.......

Interessant ist es auf alle Fälle.

[roback]

Hier die fragen und antworten von mike simmons, wäre wunderbar, wenn jeder der sie liest, den inhalt bewerten könnte:


Dear Mr Simmons,

now we have collected some questions about texhoma.

- in the past texhoma announced a share buy-back program. Is this still
going on?

***** No.

- how do you explain yourself, why the share quotation does vary so extremly
how as in the last days?

***** The stock is thinly traded and subject to high volatility. I can not
explain what the market does.

- what are you doing to improve lastingly the share quotation of txhe?

***** The 8K filings will outline what we have done. Future filings will
also contain further detail. Of course, it is our goal to increase the
shareholder value of the company.


- does Texhoma also keep 11% of shares in Clovelly in the future? (mxxr
writes in sec that they have bought the shares from Clovelly.)

***** As reported in an 8K filing, the deal to sell Texhoma's 11% interest
in Clovelly has been terminated.


- when does the drilling begin in Clovelly?

***** There is no prospect for drilling at this time.


We know a few of people who wanted to buy texhoma shares, but they are
uncertainly, because the only reliability was the sinking course of txhe in
the past. So we need some positive notes...

That you have answered to the last mail was a good sign here in the board,
many of users have tried this without success, so it is the minimum of
confidence.

In advance a lot of thanks for your answering,

***** Thank you for writing, and for your interest in Texhoma. As you may
appreciate, I am unable to give much guidance due to regulations. However,
I always welcome you to ask questions and I will do what I can to assist
you.

Kind Regards,

Mike Simmons
President
Texhoma Energy, Inc.

[OilDragon]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.659.575 von roback am 12.07.07 19:52:12

Hallo roback,

das scheint ja nochmal richtig interessant zu werden !!

Alleine wenn man bedenkt, dass TXHE nun doch die 11% an Clovelly behält, das brint wenn Sie dort füngid werden mehrere Millionen,
dann wäre der Kurs schnell auf 0,50€ PRO ANTEIL !!

Ich warte noch ein wenig ab und werde bei guten NEW`S, wieder einsteigen !!

Welches Projekt TXHE als nächstes in Angriff nehmen ( Bohren ) wollen, geht aus der Mail nicht hervor.

Bleibe bitte am Ball und Frage mal nach, welches Projekt TXHE als nächstes in Angriff nehmen wollen.



MfG
OilDragon

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.660.403 von OilDragon am 12.07.07 20:48:56

ich finde, dass simmons in meiner lesart nicht herumschnörkelt, sondern klare aussagen macht, auch dort, wo andere in seiner position vielleicht beschönigen würden (als beispiel: kein bohrbeginn in nächster zeit..).

Alleine dass er sich wieder meldet, schafft bei mir ein gewisses vertrauen in die aktivitäten von txhe und ich finde, wir sollten sein angebot tatsächlich nutzen, hin und wieder fragen zu stellen.
da ihm meine adresse mittlerweile bekannt ist, stelle ich mich gerne für den kontakt zur verfügung, was soviel heißt, fragen sammeln, am besten als bm an mich und in englisch.
wir können ja zusammen überlegen, wann es sinnvoll ist, den kontakt herzustellen. auf jeden fall werde ich mich erstmal bei simmons bedanken.
selbstverständlich steht natürlich jedem frei, selbst simmons zu schreiben...

ansonsten: 50 cent, herrschaften, das wäre ein ding.., war ja schon mal als kursziel ausgegeben, die entwicklung kennt jeder..

[kaktus7]

Na ja, was nutzt die Beteiligung wenn nicht gebohrt wird

Ich sehe keinen Hinweis auf irgendeine positive Entwicklung.

[pokajoke0]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.661.691 von roback am 12.07.07 22:05:57

Top dein Einsatz, ehrlich.

Die Antworten sind jedoch sehr offen gehalten, da kann man alles oder gar nichts erkennen.Das hat man wohl auch ein bischen erwartet, ich meine, dass er seinen 8K-Report bezüglich Clovelly-Anteile nicht widerspricht ist doch auch klar.

Ich möchte mal gerne wissen, was mit Bug-Snag los ist, da sollten ja Ende diesen Monates die Gasverkäufe losgehen, sprich Kohle ins Haus zurückkommen.
Was ist mit Manfield etc.

Kanns du da mal Nachhagen, oder hast du das schon getan?

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.666.004 von pokajoke0 am 13.07.07 10:14:44

die fragen werde ich sammeln, und weiterreichen.
er hat heute wieder geschrieben, d.h. der kontakt ist hergestellt und läuft, ich glaube der ton ist sehr wichtig, um etwas zu erfahren, mit der tür ins haus fallen ist nicht. so schätze ich zunächst einen höflichen kontakt, der eine vertrauensbasis herstellt.
vielleicht bekommen wir dadurch informationen, die wir aus diesen filings so nicht herauslesen können.
auch finde ich, dass wir diesen thread hier pflegen sollten, nützt es doch erstmal allen die investiert sind, wenn wir neue käufer interessieren.
und - vielleicht ist es auch nicht zu unterschätzen, dass mr.simmons weiß, dass es anleger gibt, die sich für seine firma interessieren, vielleicht motiviert ihn das sogar.

also - her mit beiträgen.

gruß, roback

[OilDragon]

Drückt auf diesen Link, und seht es EUCH an Clovelly ist aus den Propertys von Texhoma verschwunden !!!!!

http://www.texhomaenergy.com/property_portfolio/

[pokajoke0]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.673.095 von OilDragon am 13.07.07 17:43:35

Au man wenn das stimmt, das 11%Clovelly nicht mehr im Besitz von Texhoma ist, was passiert dann mit dem Finanzierungsvertrag??

Der ist doch dann geplatzt oder, den Clovelly war der Hauptbestand-teil des Vertrages.

Ich möchte gar nicht daran denken
Schauen wir mal, ob bald News kommen, dann wissen wir mehr.

[Blindgaenger2]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.669.663 von roback am 13.07.07 14:31:08

roback,

ich find, dass du das wirklich super gemacht hast. Natürlich sollten wir diesen thread pflegen.Und wir müssen schnell reagieren.... das können wir am besten miteinander. Ob Texhoma oder eine andere Firma die nach Öl bohrt. Egal Der ölpreis steigt wie verrückt.... und wir brauchen eine Firma die nach Öl bohrt und auch eins findet. Ob Texhoma oder MXXR egal......

Wir wollen Gewinn.......

[roback]

sorry, war lange unterwegs, will gleich noch die letzte mail von simmons reinstellen:

My pleasure.

Keep your eyes open for the filing of 8K reports. Since almost "everything"
that happens in this company is "material", we intend to be very forthcoming
in the 8K reporting.

Please do not hesitate to contact me at any time.




Mike Simmons
President

TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC.
100 Highland Park Village
Suite 200
Dallas, Texas 75205

P 214.295.3380
F 214.853.5116
C 713.446.8718


gleich noch die übersetzung dank oildragon:

Behalten Sie Ihre Augen offen für die Archivierung vom nächsten 8K Bericht. Da ist fast „alles“, das in dieser Firma geschieht, „aufgelistet“, Wir haben vor, sehr bald einen neuen 8K Bericht zu veröffentlichen.

Bitte zögern Sie nicht, mich jederzeit zu kontaktieren.


Mike Simmons
President

muss jetzt erstmal was essen, bis später, roback

ach noch, da simmons das angebot macht, auch nicht mit fragen zu zögern, werde ich am we nach clovelly fragen, wo es geblieben ist..., wnn od es nicht mehr gefunden hat...

[roback]

habe simmons heute geschrieben und die fragen von hier gestellt.
sobald antwort da ist, könnt ihr sie hier lesen.

wenn ich seine letzten zwei schreiben anschaue, dann fällt mir insbesondere die eindringlichkeit, auf den kommenden bericht zu achten, auf, auch dass er ihn für uns extra ankündigt.

da im aktiengeschäft nicht nur die fakten, sondern auch das "wer hat was wann wie gesagt", eine rolle spielt, könnte im nächsten filing ("augen auf") eine nachricht verpackt sein, die die aktie in ihrem kurs stark bewegen könnte.


natürlich bleibt die richtung wie bei jeder spekulation offen, auch versaut der euro den wechselkurs, würde gerne lieber in usa kaufen, wenn das ein wenig einfacher wäre (bin bei der diba). aber - zum einen glaube ich, dass die demokraten die nächste wahl gewinnen und dass dann auch der dollar an stärke gewinnt, sprich wer im laufe des jahres us-aktien in euro kauft, könnte einen währungsgewinn einfahren.

ich spekuliere auf einen steigenden kurs, die beiden ausreißer nach oben haben gezeigt, wo es hingehen könnte...

gruß, roback

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.673.095 von OilDragon am 13.07.07 17:43:35

ich habe mir die geschichte noch einmal angeschaut:

Update On Clovelly Sale

The Company reported in its Form 8-K filing made with the Commission on May 25, 2007, that it had entered into a Letter Agreement with Matrixx Resource Holdings Inc. ("Matrixx") to sell its 11% working interest in the property known as the Clovelly Prospect (the "Clovelly Prospect") for $150,000. In connection with and pursuant to the Letter Agreement, we expected to receive an earnest money deposit of $25,000 on or about May 25, 2007, with the remainder of the purchase price to be paid on or before June 30, 2007; however, we have not received any funds or any deposit from
Matrixx and the Letter Agreement has been terminated.
-
der vertrag scheint sich eindeutig auf clovelly zu beziehen;
simmons hat in seiner mail eindeutig gesagt, dass clovelly nicht verkauft wird.
im mxxr-thread spekuliert ihr, dass clovelly vielleicht doch veräußert wurde.

wie paßt das zusammen?

- möglicherweise kann simmons uns nichts anderes erzählen als das was im filing steht. demnächst soll ein neues filing herauskommen.
- bohrbeginn auf clovelly? eindeutig nein, sagt simmons.
- augen auf! sagt er, alles ist material , sagt er.

zählt man die drei aspekte zusammen, könnte es tatsächlich sein, dass txhe und mxxr sich geeinigt haben, was in einem neuen filing bekannt gegeben werden könnte.

was würde das für den kurs bedeuten?
keine ahnung.

txhe wollte für die bohrung 1,5 millionen in form von einer aktienausgabe einsammeln.
mxxr müßte dann das geld aufbringen ...

wer würde profitieren?

ja od, es wird richtig spannend...

[Blindgaenger2]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.703.589 von roback am 15.07.07 22:27:42

ich denke auch, dass es ein sehr interessantes Geschäft ist was da läuft.....

bin mal gespannt was da rauskommt....

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.705.135 von Blindgaenger2 am 16.07.07 01:59:41

springe gerade zwischen txhe und mxxr:

da ihr so und so alle pendelt..

also eine interessante überlegung zu dem konflikt um clovelly:

der ordentliche weg wäre eigentlich: txhe und mxxr einigen sich, die sache wird verkündet und clovelly aus dem programm von txhe genommen.
vielleicht wird auch gerade ein rechtsstreit um die 11% geführt, der texhoma, der vielleicht noch offen ist, aber texhoma nicht erlaubt ist, die 11% solange als besitz auszuweisen...

das könnte also auch bedeuten, txhe hat eventuell nur vorübergehend clovelly zugehängt, und wenn sie einen möglichen rechtssreit gewännen, würde clovelly wieder bei texhoma auftauchen.

also ihr schlauen füchse, die ihr seid, wer aktien von txhe und mxxr besitzt, wird mit einer aktie gewinn einfahren und kann die andere laufen lassen..

ich bin nur bei texhoma investiert, schade, habe mxxr vor ein paar tagen bei 0,002 verschmäht...

[roback]

post ist da:

die antwort:

Clovelly is still owned by Texhoma. There are no plans by the operator to
drill another hole on this property at this time.

The web site is not up to date and should not be used as a source for
accurate information at this time. Been busy with other matters.

It is our intention to issue additional 8K's on a timely basis as business
conditions warrant.


Mike Simmons
President

TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC.
100 Highland Park Village
Suite 200
Dallas, Texas 75205

P 214.295.3380
F 214.853.5116
C 713.446.8718



hier die fragen dazu:


-----Original Message-----
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 9:40 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: RE:

Dear Mr. Simmons,

So I took over the coordination of questions, and hope we won`t stress you,
so there is enough time to do your daily work.

Some members of our board of discussion in germany wanted to know what
happens with bug-snag, the selling of gas should started this month?

What happens with manfield?

One member recognized in a link of your homepage, that clovelley has
disappeared out of the propertys. Does it mean something, because you have
said, the 11% of clovelly belongs still and will belong to texhoma?

So I hope, you will find an answer, or could we refer up to your last
announcement of a new 8-k filing soon?


Much thanks for answering so far and a good week for you and your team.



nun darf weiter spekuliert werden, aber:

wie es aussieht, gibt es keine schnelle entscheidung zu clovelly

dennoch, das "still" ist zumindest im deutschen auslegbar:

noch!

oder: noch....

ich wage keine meinung, ich laß mich überraschen

[Blindgaenger2]

für mich heißt das, dass es immer noch keine Klärung gibt......
man muss wohl abwarten, wie sich das entwickelt.

Meine Meinung dazu:

Wir werden es bald erfahren....

[roback]

warten auf die news, allerdings ist die news angekündigt, wir wissen nicht wann, aber
es hörte sich nach einer kursbewegenden nachricht an und in der regel kauft man vor einer news

falls die news richtig gut ausfällt, werden in usa die preise stark anziehen, da die leerverkäufer, die meiner meinung nach schon wieder am wirken sind, einsteigen müssen.

könnte sein, dass die letzten beiden signifikanten anstiege auf diese weise zustande kamen und eben gleich wieder in sich zusammen fielen, als keine anschlüsse gekauft wurden.
kann ein pushversuch gewesen sein, aber zeigt mir, wie der kurs abrauschen kann, wenn es soweit ist.
in ffm schnellte z.b. das ask in ein paar minuten von 0,02 auf 0,07..

so denn, wer hat mut mit einzusteigen?

[Blindgaenger2]

immer noch nichts Neues

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.819.143 von Blindgaenger2 am 23.07.07 22:20:50

noch nichts...

aber das gleiche schema:
kurzer kräftiger anstieg, zum schluss gedrückt, leerverkäufer?
oder soll der kurs niedrig gehalten werden?
oder nur zufall bei solch kleinen umsätzen??

cool bleiben.

solange der kurs sinkt, ohne dass irgendeine begründung vorliegt ist das pillepalle.

solange immer wieder ausschläge nach oben da sind, durchaus mit volumen, gemessen am durchschnitt, kann es nach wie vor sein, dass der kurs explodiert, möglicherweise mit einer nachricht.

geduld

[roback]

the same procedur as every day.

kleiner überhang drückt den kurs.

ein konto in den usa und sämtliche otcbb werte geshortet, ich glaube besser und sicherer kann man nicht money sammeln...,

grauenhaft, hier rumzusitzen und auf steigende kurse zu warten.., otcbb funktioniert anders und wenns halt mal grün wird, muss man einsteigen, um am selben tag gleich wieder zu shorten, fantastisch..

was meint ihr?

[Blindgaenger2]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.835.456 von roback am 24.07.07 22:09:40

bei den meisten Firmen muss man das machen....

aber es gibt auch ein paar bei denen es sich rentiert long zu bleiben.....

[Blindgaenger2]

[roback]

angriff auf die 2 cent von oben, ein shorty...

wer wars?

[roback]

Dear Mr.Simmons,

weekend again and a horrible summer in germany: cold and wet.

So we can have maybe a little bit of sun by your answers:

- can you approximately limit the appearing of additional 8K's, that you
have announced?

- is the number of shares issued and outstanding still correct?:

177,437,252?

Shares authorized: 200 Million?

We didn®t find other indications, so is it up-to-date?



A lot of greetings and thanks for answering.

[roback]

die antwort (innerhalb des selben tages!):

An 8K was filed today. All 8K's may be viewed from the Yahoo web site.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?d=t&s=TXHE.PK

The number of shares outstanding is approx. 220 million. There were
additional shares sold to raise some money and there were shares issued to
Valeska Energy for management services.



There are 300 million shares authorized.

Thank you for your continued support.


Mike Simmons
President

TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC.
100 Highland Park Village
Suite 200
Dallas, Texas 75205

P 214.295.3380
F 214.853.5116
C 713.446.8718

[roback]

und hier das filing:



Form 8-K for TEXHOMA ENERGY INC

30-Jul-2007

Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Unregistered Sale of Equity Securi


ITEM 1.01. ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT.

Voting Agreement

On or about June 5, 2007, certain of Texhoma Energy, Inc.'s (the "Company's", "we," and "our") largest shareholders, including Capersia Pte. Ltd.; Frank A. Jacobs, our former officer and Director; and Valeska Energy, Inc., which is controlled by William M. Simmons, the President and Director of the Company, and is majority owned by Daniel Vesco, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company, through an entity which he controls ("Valeska" and collectively the "Shareholders") entered into a Voting Agreement (the "Voting Agreement"). Pursuant to the terms of the Voting Agreement the Shareholders agreed that for the Term of the Voting Agreement, as defined below, no Shareholder would vote any of the shares of common stock (the "Shares") which they hold for (i.e. in favor of) the removal of William M. Simmons or Daniel Vesco, our Directors (the "New Directors"). The Shareholders also agreed that in the event of any shareholder vote of the Company (either by Board Meeting, a Consent to Action with Meeting, or otherwise) relating to the removal of the New Directors; the re-election of the New Directors; and/or the increase in the number of directors of the Company during the Term of the Voting Agreement, that such Shareholders would vote their Shares against the removal of the New Directors; for the re-election of such New Directors; and/or vote against the increase in the number of directors of the Company, without the unanimous consent of the New Directors, respectively.

The Voting Agreement further provided that in the event that either of the New Directors breaches his fiduciary duty to the Company, including, but not limited to such Director's conviction of an act or acts constituting a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, theft or fraud; such Director's gross negligence in connection with his service to the Company as a Director and/or in any executive capacity which he may hold; and/or if any Shareholder becomes aware of information which would lead a reasonable person to believe that such Director has committed fraud or theft from the Company, or a violation of the Securities laws, the Voting Agreement shall not apply, and the Shareholders may vote their Shares as they see fit.

The Term of the Voting Agreement is until June 5, 2009 (the "Term"). The Shareholders agreed to enter into the Voting Agreement in consideration for the New Directors agreeing to serve the Company as Directors of the Company.

On or about July 12, 2007, another one of our significant shareholders, Lucayan Oil and Gas Investments, Ltd. ("LOGI"), which is 50% owned by Max Maxwell, our former President and Director, entered into a Voting Agreement with us, which was amended by a First Amendment to Voting Agreement, which provided that the shares of common stock held by LOGI would be subject to the identical terms of our June 5, 2007 Voting Agreement with the Shareholders.

Cooperation Agreement and Mutual Release

On or about July 12, 2007, LOGI; Mr. Maxwell; Meredith Maxwell, Mr. Maxwell's daughter and our former employee; and A.E. Buzz Jehle, our former consultant (collectively the "Former Interested Parties") entered into a Cooperation Agreement and Mutual Release (the "Release") with us and Texaurus Energy, Inc. ("Texaurus"), our wholly owned Delaware subsidiary (for the purposes of the description of the Release, all references to "we," "us," the "Company" or similar words include Texaurus). In connection with the Release, we and the Former Interested Parties agreed to release each other (including employees, officers, directors, representatives, employees and assigns) from any and all claims, rights, causes of action and obligations which were known or unknown at the time of the entry into the Release, subject only to the Assignment by the Former Interested Parties of their rights, causes of actions or demands against any former officers or Directors of us to the Company and the New Directors (the "Assignment") and the Extension. The release we provided to the Former Interested Parties was against any and all claims, rights, causes of action and obligations which were known or unknown at the time of the entry into the Release, or which are not brought to the attention of the New Directors or the Company by 5:00 P.M. Central Standard Time, on September 30, 2007 (the "Extension").

. . .


ITEM 3.02. UNREGISTERED SHARES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

On or about July 9, 2007, we sold 1,000,000 shares of our common stock to Camecc A/S, a Norwegian company, in consideration for $12,500 or $0.0125 per share. We also agreed to provide Camecc A/S piggy-back registration rights in connection with the sale. We claim an exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, for the above issuance, since the issuance did not involve a public offering, the recipient took the securities for investment and not resale and the Company took appropriate measures to restrict transfer. No underwriters or agents were involved in the issuance and no underwriting discounts or commissions were paid by the Company.

In July 2007, we agreed to issue Mr. Nafi Onat an aggregate of 500,000 restricted shares of our common stock in connection with his entry into the Consulting Agreement (described above). We claim an exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, for the above issuance, since the issuance did not involve a public offering, the recipient took the securities for investment and not resale and the Company took appropriate measures to restrict transfer. No underwriters or agents were involved in the issuance and no underwriting discounts or commissions were paid by the Company.



ITEM 3.03. MATERIAL MODIFICATION TO RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

On July 17, 2007, the Company's Board of Directors unanimously agreed by a written consent to action without a meeting, to adopt a Certificate of Designations for the creation of a Series A preferred stock (the "Series A Preferred Stock").

The Series A Preferred Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share. The Series A Preferred Stock consists of one thousand (1,000) shares, each having no dividend rights, no liquidation preference, and no conversion or redemption rights. However, the one thousand (1,000) shares of Series A Preferred Stock have the right, voting in aggregate, to vote on all shareholder matters equal to fifty-one percent (51%) of the total vote. For example, if there are 10,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock issued and outstanding at the time of a shareholder vote, the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, voting separately as a class, will have the right to vote an aggregate of 10,400,000 shares, out of a total number of 20,400,000 shares voting.

Additionally, the Company shall not adopt any amendments to the Company's Bylaws, Articles of Incorporation, as amended, make any changes to the Certificate of Designations, or effect any reclassification of the Series A Preferred Stock, without the affirmative vote of at least 66-2/3% of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock. However, the Company may, by any means authorized by law and without any vote of the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, make technical, corrective, administrative or similar changes to the Certificate of Designations that do not, individually or in the aggregate, adversely affect the rights or preferences of the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock.

On or about July 26, 2007, with an effective date of July 31, 2007, we entered into a Termination of Lease Agreement (the "Termination Agreement") with our landlord at 2200 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 340, Houston, Texas 77056 (the "Post Oak Office"). Pursuant to the terms of the Termination Agreement, we and the landlord agreed to terminate the lease on the Post Oak Office space, and we agreed to pay the landlord approximately $4,090 as a termination fee, $3,331 as payment of past due rental fees; and we also agreed to forfeit any right to our security deposit of approximately $1,578 held by the landlord pursuant to the terms of our lease in connection with such Termination Agreement.



ITEM 5.02. DEPARTURE OF DIRECTORS OR PRINCIPAL OFFICERS; ELECTION OF DIRECTORS; APPOINTMENT OF PRINCIPAL OFFICERS.

On July 26, 2007, the Board of Directors appointed Daniel Vesco, our Chief Executive Officer and a Director as interim Chief Financial Officer and William M. Simmons, our President and Director as Treasurer and Secretary of us.



ITEM 5.03. AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OR BYLAWS; CHANGE IN FISCAL YEAR.

On or about July 17, 2007, we filed a Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Nevada to amend our Certificate of Incorporation to include the Series A Preferred Stock designation described above.

[roback]

also zunächst ist mal festzustellen, dass mehr aktien im umlauf sind, als von den zahlen angenommen.

wäre natürlich nicht schlecht gewesen, das irgendwie zu publizieren, oder haben wir was übersehen?


vielleicht könnt ihr das filing besser lesen, mir macht das ganz schön mühe.

gelesen habe ich:

- dass anteile an eine norwegische firma verkauft wurden (die ominösen 1,2 cent)

- dass vorzugsaktien mit stimmrechten eingeführt wurden, die auch offiziell beantragt worden sind.

- eine erklärung wurde in diesem zusammenhang abgegeben, dass die verantwortlichen "sauber" für die firma arbeiten, im anderen falle abgesetzt werden können (erinnert irgendwie an die tour de france)

- dass eine konsolidierung punkto personenverantwortlichkeit erreicht wurde

- dass die alte bürobude aufgegeben wurde und eine einigung mit dem vermieter erzielt wurde


was ist davon zu halten?
mir scheint, dass die kacke ganz schön am dampfen war, vielleicht noch ist.
wenn sie sich mit solchen problemen herumschlagen, dann hört sich das nach einem zerstrittenen haufen an, was vielleicht auch die meldungen in der vergangenheit um f.jacobs erklären.

können sie sich nun ihren originären aufgaben zuwenden?

ich denke schon.
denn, dieses filing liest sich für mich wie, da ist jemand der den laden aufräumt und eine chance für die zukunft sieht.
simmons versucht zu ordnen und vertrauen zu schaffen.
mehr lese ich allerdings auch nicht, die finanziellen vorgänge kann ich nicht bewerten, da bin ich gespannt, ob und wenn, wie der markt reagiert.

die verwässerung des kurses scheint mir allerdings durch den kursverfall im preis enthalten zu sein.

die botschaft heißt: zukunft

nun braucht es ordentliche meldungen, die die geschäfte betreffen..
her damit.

[Blindgaenger2]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.945.347 von roback am 31.07.07 08:30:50

danke roback,

das hast du wirklich gut gemacht. Jetzt wissen wir wenigstens den momentanen Stand von den shares. Verwundert mich ein wenig, dass Simmons so ehrlich ist.
Aber es sieht wirklich danach aus, dass er den Laden mit eiserner Hand führt. 220 Millionen sind für die otcbb nicht unbedingt zuviel. Wenn es nicht mehr werden, wie die angegebenen ---> 300 million shares authorized dann ist es halb so schlimm.

so jetzt werde ich mich noch dem filing zuwenden....

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.946.708 von Blindgaenger2 am 31.07.07 10:09:43

mein dankschreiben an simmons:


Dear Mr. Simmons,

much thanks for answering so rapidly and directly.

The filing shows a lot of your hard work in the past to consolidate texhoma.

I was astonished about the choice of clear words in the second paragraph, so I think it was necessary to do.

I hope, this will build up confidence into your work and into the company.


Sure, we were not pleased about the number of actually shares, because this information was new for us, we couldn`t find it anywhere. But we see also the necessary of the availability of money to finance projects and the people who do the work.

I`m very excited if, and if, how the stockmarket reacted to the news.

Personally, I valuate the filing as a good first step in a "new" future.
So I hope your team and you can fill this future with good results.

Now we hope, after a consolidation within the company, that a next filing contains statements of your projects in particular what will happen with clovelly in the future. I heard from friends that this is one point which restrains a financially engagement.

I wish you a lot of power and good luck!



so, jetzt bin ich erstmal nur gespannt, was die zocker heute abend in usa machen, oder sollte es tatsächlich auch mal andere käufer geben??

[roback]

interessant ist noch, dass es gestern vor der meldung keine auffälligen käufe oder verkäufe gab.., spricht für seriosität.

der umsatz am ende des handels.. wer weiß..

[roback]

wer lust hat, noch mehr zu lesen:

http://www.otcbb.com/asp/Info_Center.asp

oder wenns nicht klappt über otcbb - txhe - filings

da stehen 38 seiten zum thema, auch was unter yahoo zu finden war, zum teil als meldung aus den vortagen.

entweder hatte ich die verpaßt, oder sie sind erst seit heute drin..

[Blindgaenger2]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.950.010 von roback am 31.07.07 13:35:13

ich denke, dass jetzt trotzdem die Interessierten noch ein wenig abwarten, wie sich die ganze Lage entwickelt......

Aber deine Schreiben sind sehr gut

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 30.953.948 von Blindgaenger2 am 31.07.07 17:28:20

ich hoffe, dass es diese interessierten gibt.

eine reaktion in den usa ist im moment nicht erkennbar, es ist aber auch nicht leicht zu vermitteln, warum man eine firma kaufen soll, die sich im moment mehr mit sich selbst beschäftigt, als mit ihren projekten
- und dennoch glaube ich, dass dies heute im kern eine gute nachricht war.
wird doch bei otcbb-werten in der regel nur so mit nichtssagenden positivmeldungen um sich geworfen, hier hört es sich anders an und das macht mir mut, mag auch der kurs heute am ende wieder gedrückt werden.

dass kein rauschender abverkauf heute stattfindet ist ebenso erfreulich, auch wenn ich mit meinen prognosen vor börsenschluss hier im thread schon mal daneben lag...

[roback]

im übrigen komme ich im moment nicht mehr über otcbb.com an das ausführliche filing heran.
wer ausführlich lesen will kann hier nachfragen, ich habe noch eine andere quelle entdeckt.

[roback]

da fällt einem doch nichts mehr ein.

mit 18 dollar ein 10% loch nach unten gerissen.
nun siehts wieder so aus, als ob die alten tiefstände angesteuert werden, 0,011 dollar, um genau zu sein.
vor ein paar tagen waren die 1,8 cent schon mal zu sehen..

aber 18 mit dollar nach unten, das ist schon ein trauerspiel....

[roback]

das selbe spielchen wie gestern, diesmal mit riskantem einsatz von 90 dollar,

ganz schönclever, da shortet jemand zum test mit wenig einsatz. kommen keine käufe, dann gehts weiter nach unten.

zum dritten mal die 1,8 cent, man gewöhnt sich an das bild... und schwuppsdiwupps rauschen wir ab.

so denn, wo ist der retter wieder mit seinen 50.000 scheinen?

[Blindgaenger2]

wenn es so weiter geht kann man Texhoma im Amiland bald unter 0,01 kaufen.... Dann wird es schön langsam interessant
Dann bin ich mit Sicherheit mit nem größeren Paket dabei

[Blindgaenger2]

man bedenke. Die haben immer noch die 16 % an Clovelly....

[Beobachter1a]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.192.440 von Blindgaenger2 am 16.08.07 20:29:51

Nein, haben SIE nicht !!!


Form 10KSB for TEXHOMA ENERGY INC


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

21-Aug-2007

Annual Report



ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION
Plan of Operations

The Company's current plan of operations for the next twelve (12) months is to bring the Company current in its filings with the Commission, get the Company's accounting and controls and procedures in order and work to decrease the Company's current liabilities.

In connection with our properties, a deal we had in place to sell the Clovelly Field interests fell through, and we are relying on the operators of our other properties regarding the direction of those prospects. To date, all of those operators have indicated that they have no plans to expand their current drilling prospects.

We currently believe that we can continue our operations for approximately the next six months with funds raised in June 2007, and anticipate needing to raise approximately $300,000 in the next twelve months to pay our current liabilities and maintain our current rate of monthly expenditures, of which there can be no assurance.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 COMPARED TO THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

We had no revenues for the years ended September 30, 2004 or September 30, 2005.

We had oil and gas exploration expenses of $1,709,441 for the year ended September 30, 2005, compared to $0 for the year ended September 30, 2004. The oil and gas exploration expenses were in connection with the Company's acquisition of Black Swan in November 2004, and subsequent exploration expenses in connection with Black Swan.

We had total general and administrative expenses of $1,122,805 for the year ended September 30, 2005, compared to $3,222,977 for the year ended September 30, 2004, a decrease of $2,100,172 or 65.2% from the prior period. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was in connection with our change in business focus to an oil and gas exploration company during the year ended September 30, 2005, and reduced expenses therewith.

We had a net loss of $2,832,246 for the year ended September 30, 2005, compared to a net loss of $3,222,977 of net loss for the year ended September 30, 2004, a decrease in net loss of $390,731 or 12% from the prior period. The main reason for the decrease in net loss was the $2,100,172 decrease in general and administrative expenses in connection with the change in business focus to an oil and gas exploration company, offset by the $1,709,441 increase in oil and gas exploration expenses for the year ended September 30, 2005, compared to the year ended September 30, 2004.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of September 30, 2005, we had total assets of $149,805, consisting of cash of $149,805.

We had total liabilities, consisting solely of current liabilities as of September 30, 2005 of $1,194,958, which included accounts payable of $27,449, accrued expenses of $122,509 and notes payable due to affiliates of $1,045,000, which notes were payable to Capersia, LOGI and MFS Technology.

We had negative working capital of $1,045,153 and a retained deficit of $7,374,759 as of September 30, 2005.

For the year ended September 30, 2005, we had cash used in operating activities of $100,195, which was mainly due to stock issued for services of $1,045,012 in connection with the settlement of debt owed to a former director and consultant and $1,709,441 of oil and gas exploration costs, offset by net loss of $2,832,246.

We had net cash used in investing activities for the year ended September 30, 2005, which was solely due to $1,395,000 invested in the joint venture which amount was later acquired by Lucayan Oil & Gas Investments and converted to shares at $0.04 per share, as described above.

We received $1,645,000 in cash provided by financing activities for the year ended September 30, 2005, through the $1,045,000 of loans from affiliates, which amount was loaned to us by Capersia, LOGI and MFS Technology, and $600,000 of proceeds from the sale of common stock in connection with:

· The March 8, 2005, sale of 2,000,000 shares of common stock in connection with a private placement at $0.10 share for which the Company received $200,000; and

· The December 2005, sale of an aggregate of 4,000,000 in shares of common stock to two entities in connection with a private placement at $0.10 share for which the Company received $400,000.


FUNDING TRANSACTIONS:
In March 2006, our wholly owned Subsidiary Texaurus entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. ("Laurus"), whereby Texaurus sold a Secured Term Note in the amount of $8,500,000 to Laurus.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Texaurus subsequently used all but approximately $218,000 to fund the acquisition of Little White Lake Property and Kilrush Properties, with the remaining amount going into a restricted account for use only by Texaurus in connection with further development of the properties held by Texaurus.

In March 2006, we raised $300,000 from the sale of 7,500,000 shares of our common stock, which shares were sold at $0.04 per share, to our former Chief Executive Officer and former Director, Frank Jacobs.

We raised an aggregate of $384,000 through the sale of 4,800,000 units at a price of $0.08 per unit during June through December 2006, which units each included one (1) share of common stock and one (1) one-year warrant to purchase one (1) share of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share.

We raised an aggregate of $297,500 through the sale of 23,800,000 shares of common stock at $0.0125 per share between May and July 2007.

We have subsequently used the majority of this funding to pay our general and administrative expenses and certain acquisitions including the purchase of the Leases from Sunray and the Management Agreement with Valeska, as described above.

We believe that we have sufficient funds to repay the interest and principal payments on amortizing payment required on the Secured Term Note with Laurus, through the payment of production payments on the properties owned by Texaurus, as such amortizing payments do not have any minimum payment amount, and as such, the required payment of such amortizing payment on the Secured Term Note will not adversely impact our future current assets or cash on hand. However we will need to repay $8,500,000 (minus any payment of principal on the Note which we are able to make through our 80% production payments to Laurus) on March 27, 2009, which funds we do not currently have and which we can provide no assurances will be available when such Note is due.

Additionally, to continue our planned oil and gas operations the Company remains reliant on raising further equity funds and our growth and continued operations could be impaired by limitations on our access to the capital markets. In the event that we do not generate the amount of revenues from our oil and gas properties which we anticipate, and/or we decide to purchase additional oil and gas properties and are required to raise additional financing, we may have to raise additional capital and/or scale back our operations which would have a material adverse impact upon our ability to pursue our business plan. There can be no assurance that capital from outside sources will be available, or if such financing is available, it may involve issuing securities senior to our common stock or equity financings which are dilutive to holders of our common stock. In addition, in the event we do not raise additional capital from conventional sources, it is likely that our growth will be restricted and we may need to scale back or curtail implementing our business plan.

We have no current commitments from our officers and Directors or any of our shareholders to supplement our operations or provide us with financing in the future. If we are unable to raise additional capital from conventional sources and/or additional sales of stock in the future, we may be forced to curtail or cease our operations. Even if we are able to continue our operations, the failure to obtain financing could have a substantial adverse effect on our business and financial results.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following risk factors and other information in this annual report on Form 10-KSB before deciding to become a holder of our Common Stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business and financial results could be negatively affected to a significant extent.

WE WILL NEED ADDITIONAL FINANCING TO CONTINUE OUR BUSINESS PLAN AND DRILL AND STUDY ADDITIONAL WELLS, WHICH FINANCING, IF WE ARE UNABLE TO RAISE MAY FORCE US TO SCALE BACK OR ABANDON OUR BUSINESS PLAN.

We raised $8,500,000 from the sale of a Secured Term Note to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. ("Laurus") in March 2006. However, approximately $7,894,235 of the amount borrowed from Laurus was subsequently used to purchase the Intracoastal City property, the interests in the Barnes Creek gas field and the Edgerly field and to pay closing costs and fees in connection with the various funding transactions.

We raised an aggregate of $384,000 through the sale of 4,800,000 units at a price of $0.08 per unit during June through December 2006, which units each included one (1) share of common stock and one (1) one-year warrant to purchase one (1) share of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share. We raised an aggregate of $297,500 through the sale of 23,800,000 shares of common stock at $0.0125 per share between May and July 2007.

We believe that the funds remaining from the sale of the Note to Laurus, the funds raised through the placement of new equity, and revenue received from the sale of oil and gas production will allow us to pay our outstanding liabilities and continue our business operations for at least the next six months. However, as described below, we cannot be sure that we will find any oil and/or gas on our properties in the future, our current properties will continue to produce, nor can we provide any assurances that if found, that the oil and/or gas will be in commercial quantities, that we will be able to extract it from the ground, that we will not face liability in connection with our extraction efforts, and/or that we will be able to generate the revenues we expect from the future sale of any oil and gas we may discover in the future.

Additionally, we may choose to spend additional monies on the purchases of oil and gas properties in the future. Depending on the decisions of our management, the volatility of the prices of oil and/or gas, our exploration activities, and/or potential liability, and the amount of money we receive from the sale of oil and gas, if any, we may need to raise additional capital substantially faster than six months, which we currently estimate such previously borrowed monies will last. We do not currently have any additional commitments or identified sources of additional capital from third parties or from our officers, directors or majority shareholders. We can provide no assurance that additional financing will be available on favorable terms, if at all. If we are not able to raise the capital necessary to continue our business operations, we may be forced to abandon or curtail our business plan and/or suspend our exploration activities.

WE OWE LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD., A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF MONEY WHICH WE DO NOT HAVE.

In connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement, Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. ("Laurus"), purchased a $8,500,000 Secured Term Note from Texaurus, which we have guaranteed, and which bears interest at the rate of 10.25% per year (as of July 24, 2007), which is due and payable on March 27, 2009, and which principal is repayable by way of a production payments equal to 80% of the gross production revenue received by Texaurus in connection with the Intracoastal City Field, the Edgerly and the Barnes Creek Properties.

There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient funds to pay any principal or interest on the Note when due on March 27, 2009, if such repayment amount is not sufficiently covered by the payment of production proceeds to Laurus, as described above, and we do not currently believe that such production payments will be sufficient to repay such Note as of the date of this filing. If we do not have sufficient funds to pay the total remaining amount of the Note (after taking into account payments of principal, which we may not have sufficient funds to pay) when due, we will be in default and Laurus may take control of substantially all of our assets (as described in more detail under "Risks Relating to the Company's Securities"). As a result, we will need to raise or otherwise generate approximately $8,500,000 to repay the Note (not including any adjustments for payment of principal in connection with production payments paid by Texaurus) by March 27, 2009. If we fail to raise this money, we could be forced to abandon or curtail our business operations, which could cause any investment in the Company to become worthless.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WE RELY HEAVILY ON WILLIAM M. SIMMONS AND DANIEL VESCO, OUR OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, AND IF THEY WERE TO LEAVE, WE COULD FACE SUBSTANTIAL COSTS IN SECURING SIMILARLY QUALIFIED OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS.

Our success depends upon the personal efforts and abilities of William M. Simmons, our President and Director and Daniel Vesco, our Chief Executive Officer and Director. Our ability to operate and implement our exploration activities is heavily dependent on the continued service of Mr. Simmons and Mr. Vesco and our ability to attract qualified contractors and consultants on an as-needed basis.

We face continued competition for such contractors and consultants, and may face competition for the services of Mr. Simmons and/or Mr. Vesco in the future. We do not have any employment contracts with Mr. Simmons or Mr. Vesco, nor do we currently have any key man insurance on Mr. Simmons or Mr. Vesco. Mr. Simmons and Mr. Vesco are our driving forces and are responsible for maintaining our relationships and operations. We cannot be certain that we will be able to retain Mr. Simmons and Mr. Vesco and/or attract and retain such contractors and consultants in the future. The loss of either Mr. Simmons and Mr. Vesco, or both and/or our inability to attract and retain qualified contractors and consultants on an as-needed basis could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

WE HAVE BECOME AWARE THAT SPAM EMAILS REFERENCING THE COMPANY HAVE BEEN DISSEMINATED IN THE PAST, WHICH COULD AFFECT THE MARKET FOR AND/OR THE VALUE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.

It has come to our attention that during the month of October 2006 certain spam-emails, containing false and misleading information about our company, were disseminated over the internet. The spam-emails distributed by third parties that are not associated with the Company or its Officers or Directors have not been authorized, sanctioned or paid for by the Company. We caution investors to review our most recent Form 8-K with the Commission, our official press releases and our periodic filings, which we anticipate filing and amending in the future, before making any investment in us.

While we are not responsible for the dissemination of the spam-emails and are not aware of who was responsible, we were contacted by the Commission and were requested to voluntarily provide shareholder information and disclosures in connection with the origins of the dissemination of such spam emails. The Company cooperated fully with the Commission.

The fact that someone disseminated spam emails about our company and the fact that the Commission previously looked into such emails may be perceived by potential investors as a negative factor which could adversely affect the market for and/or the value of our stock.

BECAUSE OF THE SPECULATIVE NATURE OF OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION, THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL RISK THAT NO ADDITIONAL COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITABLE OIL OR GAS WILL BE FOUND AND THAT OUR BUSINESS WILL FAIL.

The search for commercial quantities of oil as a business is extremely risky. We cannot provide investors with any assurance that our properties contain commercially exploitable quantities of oil and/or gas.

The exploration expenditures to be made by us may not result in the discovery of commercial quantities of oil and/or gas and problems such as unusual or unexpected formations and other conditions involved in oil and gas exploration, and often result in unsuccessful exploration efforts. If we are unable to find commercially exploitable quantities of oil and gas, and/or we are unable to commercially extract such quantities, we may be forced to abandon or curtail our business plan, and as a result, any investment in us may become worthless.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OUR TOTAL AMOUNT OF ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING SHARE AMOUNTS MAY BE INCORRECT, AND WE MAY HAVE OUTSTANDING SHARES WHICH ARE UNACCOUNTED FOR.

We recently became aware of a subscription agreement relating to the sale of certain shares of our common stock in February 2005, which shares have not been issued to date, and which subscription agreement we have been unable to verify as of the date of this filing. As a result of the subscription agreement, and our previous failure to issue shares in connection with such subscription agreement, we may have potential liability for such shareholders loss of liquidity and/or the decline in the value of our common stock. Additionally, there may be other subscription agreements which we are not aware of relating to the sale of our common stock, which sales and issuances are not currently reflected with our Transfer Agent and/or in the number of outstanding shares of common stock disclosed throughout this report. As a result, we may have a larger number of shares outstanding than we currently show on our shareholders list. This difference, if present, may force us to revise our filings and/or may mean that the ownership percentage of certain shares of common stock disclosed throughout this report is incorrect. If we are required to issue additional shares of common stock in the future relating to previous subscription agreements which our current management was and/or is not aware, it could cause substantial dilution to our existing shareholders and/or we could face potential liability in connection with our failure to issue such shares when originally subscribed.

BECAUSE OF THE INHERENT DANGERS INVOLVED IN OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION, THERE IS A RISK THAT WE MAY INCUR LIABILITY OR DAMAGES AS WE CONDUCT OUR BUSINESS OPERATIONS, WHICH COULD FORCE US TO EXPEND A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF MONEY IN CONNECTION WITH LITIGATION AND/OR A SETTLEMENT.

The oil and natural gas business involves a variety of operating hazards and risks such as well blowouts, pipe failures, casing collapse, explosions, uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas or well fluids, fires, spills, pollution, releases of toxic gas and other environmental hazards and risks. These hazards and risks could result in substantial losses to us from, among other things, injury or loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property, natural resources and equipment, pollution or other environmental damage, cleanup responsibilities, regulatory investigation and penalties and suspension of operations. In addition, we may be liable for environmental damages caused by previous owners of property purchased and leased by us. As a result, substantial liabilities to third parties or governmental entities may be incurred, the payment of which could reduce or eliminate the funds available for exploration, development or acquisitions or result in the loss of our properties and/or force us to expend substantial monies in connection with litigation or settlements. As such, there can be no assurance that any insurance obtained by us will be adequate to cover any losses or liabilities. We cannot predict the availability of insurance or the availability of insurance at premium levels that justify our purchase. The occurrence of a significant event not fully insured or indemnified against could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and operations. We may elect to self-insure if management believes that the cost of insurance, although available, is excessive relative to the risks presented. In addition, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. The occurrence of an event not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, which could lead to any investment in us becoming worthless.

WE REQUIRE SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONAL FINANCING TO CONTINUE OUR EXPLORATION AND DRILLING ACTIVITIES, WHICH FINANCING IS OFTEN HEAVILY DEPENDENT ON THE CURRENT MARKET PRICE FOR OIL AND GAS, WHICH WE ARE UNABLE TO PREDICT.

Our growth and continued operations could be impaired by limitations on our access to capital markets. If the market for oil and/or gas were to weaken for an extended period of time, our ability to raise capital would be substantially reduced. There can be no assurance that capital from outside sources will be available, or that if such financing is available, that it will not involve issuing securities senior to the common stock or equity financings which will be dilutive to holders of common stock. Such issuances, if made, would likely cause a decrease in the value of our common stock.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE MARKET FOR OIL AND GAS IS INTENSELY COMPETITIVE, AND AS SUCH, COMPETITIVE PRESSURES COULD FORCE US TO ABANDON OR CURTAIL OUR BUSINESS PLAN.
The market for oil and gas exploration services is highly competitive, and we only expect competition to intensify in the future. Numerous well-established companies are focusing significant resources on exploration and are currently competing with us for oil and gas opportunities. Additionally, there are numerous companies focusing their resources on creating fuels and/or materials which serve the same purpose as oil and gas, but are manufactured from renewable resources. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully or that competitive pressures will not adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. If we are not able to successfully compete in the marketplace, we could be forced to curtail or even abandon our current business plan, which could cause any investment in us to become worthless.

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY MANAGE OUR GROWTH, WHICH COULD LEAD TO OUR INABILITY TO IMPLEMENT OUR BUSINESS PLAN.

Our growth is expected to place a significant strain on our managerial, operational and financial resources, especially considering that we currently only have three Directors and a small number of executive officers and employees. Further, as we enter into additional contracts, we will be required to manage multiple relationships with various consultants, businesses and other third parties. These requirements will be exacerbated in the event of our further growth or in the event that the number of our drilling and/or extraction operations increases. There can be no assurance that our systems, procedures and/or controls will be adequate to support our operations or that our management will be able to achieve the rapid execution necessary to successfully implement our business plan. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, our business, results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected, which could lead to us being forced to abandon or curtail our business plan and operations.

THE PRICE OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS HAS HISTORICALLY BEEN VOLATILE AND IF IT WERE TO DECREASE SUBSTANTIALLY, OUR PROJECTIONS, BUDGETS, AND REVENUES WOULD BE ADVERSELY EFFECTED, AND WE WOULD LIKELY BE FORCED TO MAKE MAJOR CHANGES IN OUR OPERATIONS.

Our future financial condition, results of operations and the carrying value of our oil and natural gas properties depend primarily upon the prices we receive for our oil and natural gas production. Oil and natural gas prices historically have been volatile and likely will continue to be volatile in the future, especially given current world geopolitical conditions. Our cash flows from operations are highly dependent on the prices that we receive for oil and natural gas. This price volatility also affects the amount of our cash flows available for capital expenditures and our ability to borrow money or raise additional capital. The prices for oil and natural gas are subject to a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. These factors include:

o the level of consumer demand for oil and natural gas;

o the domestic and foreign supply of oil and natural gas;

o the ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries ("OPEC") to agree to and maintain oil price and production controls;

o the price of foreign oil and natural gas;

o domestic governmental regulations and taxes;

o the price and availability of alternative fuel sources;

o weather conditions;

o market uncertainty due to political conditions in oil and natural gas producing regions, including the Middle East; and

o worldwide economic conditions.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These factors as well as the volatility of the energy markets generally make it extremely difficult to predict future oil and natural gas price movements with any certainty. Declines in oil and natural gas prices would not only reduce our revenue, but could reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that we can produce economically and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect upon our financial condition, results of operations, oil and natural gas reserves and the carrying values of our oil and natural gas properties. If the oil and natural gas industry experiences significant price declines, we may be unable to make planned expenditures, among other things. If this were to happen, we may be forced to abandon or curtail our business operations, which would cause the value of an investment in us to decline in value, or become worthless.

OUR ESTIMATES OF RESERVES COULD HAVE FLAWS, OR MAY NOT ULTIMATELY TURN OUT TO BE CORRECT OR COMMERCIALLY EXTRACTABLE AND AS A RESULT, OUR FUTURE REVENUES AND PROJECTIONS COULD BE INCORRECT.

Estimates of reserves and of future net revenues prepared by different petroleum engineers may vary substantially depending, in part, on the assumptions made and may be subject to adjustment either up or down in the future. Our actual amounts of production, revenue, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses, and quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves may vary substantially from the estimates. Oil and gas reserve estimates are necessarily inexact and involve matters of subjective engineering judgment. In addition, any estimates of our future net revenues and the present value thereof are based on assumptions derived in part from historical price and cost information, which may not reflect current and future values, and/or other assumptions made by us that only represent our best estimates. If these estimates of quantities, prices and costs prove inaccurate, we may be unsuccessful in expanding our oil and gas reserves base with our acquisitions. Additionally, if declines in and instability of oil and gas prices occur, then write downs in the capitalized costs associated with our oil and gas assets may be required. Because of the nature of the estimates of our reserves and estimates in general, we can provide no assurance that additional or further reductions to our estimated proved oil and gas reserves and estimated future net revenues will not be required in the future, and/or that our estimated reserves will be present and/or commercially extractable. If our reserve estimates are incorrect, the value of our common stock could decrease and we may be forced to write down the capitalized costs of

[Beobachter1a]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.257.861 von Beobachter1a am 22.08.07 17:31:01

Sorry , SIE haben Clovelly angeblich noch aber es besteht bei keinem IHRER Partner ein Interesse Clovelly zu Bohren !!

[Beobachter1a]

Texhoma wird auf 600.000.000 AKTIEN aufstocken und eine Namensänderung in "Valtex Energie" beantragen !!

Hier nachzulesen !!

http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/quotes_sec.asp?mode=&kind=&symbol=…

[Beobachter1a]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.258.362 von Beobachter1a am 22.08.07 18:00:41

Texhoma hat auch einen Split beantragt !!


Authorize our Board of Directors to affect a reverse stock split;
The Board of Directors recommends that you authorize our Board of Directors to amend our Certificate of Incorporation to affect a reverse split of our outstanding common stock in a ratio
between 1:10 and 1:50, without further approval of our stockholders, upon
a determination by our Board of Directors that such a reverse stock split is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders.

[Beobachter1a]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.258.362 von Beobachter1a am 22.08.07 18:00:41

Dieser Link ist besser !!

http://secfilings.nasdaq.com/filingFrameset.asp?FileName=000…

[Beobachter1a]

Hier ist der ganze Bericht.....



SCHEDULE 14C INFORMATION


Information Statement Pursuant to Section 14(c) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Check the appropriate box:


/X/ Preliminary Information Statement


/ / Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14c-5(d)(2))


/ / Definitive Information Statement


TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC.
(Name of Registrant As Specified In Its Charter)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):


/X/ No fee required


/ / Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14c-5(g) and 0-11


(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:


(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:


(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):


(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:


(5) Total fee paid:


/ / Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.


/ / Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.



(1) Amount Previously Paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC.
100 HIGHLAND PARK VILLAGE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75205


NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To be held on _____________, 2007


To the stockholders of Texhoma Energy, Inc.:


Notice is hereby given of a special meeting of shareholders of Texhoma Energy, Inc. (the "Company") to be held on __________, _____________, 2007 at ________ A.M. C.S.T. at ______________________, for the following purposes:


1. To authorize the filing of a Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation. The Board of Directors recommends that you approve a Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to:



a) increase the authorized shares to six hundred million (600,000,000) shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share and to re-authorize one million (1,000,000) shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share; and



b) to affect a name change to Valtex Energy Corp.



2. To authorize our Board of Directors to affect a reverse stock split . The Board of Directors recommends that you authorize our Board of Directors to amend our Certificate of Incorporation to affect a reverse split of our outstanding common stock in a ratio between 1:10 and 1:50, without further approval of our stockholders, upon a determination by our Board of Directors that such a reverse stock split is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders.



3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the special meeting.



Common and preferred stockholders of record on the close of business on ________, 2007 are entitled to notice of the meeting. All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person; however our majority shareholders do not need your vote to effect the changes above.


By Order of the Board of Directors,


/s/ Daniel Vesco
Daniel Vesco
Director
____________, 2007



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC.
100 HIGHLAND PARK VILLAGE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75205


INFORMATION STATEMENT
_________, 2007


This Information Statement is furnished by the Board of Directors of Texhoma Energy, Inc. (the "Company") to provide notice of a special meeting of stockholders of the Company which will be held on _______, _____________, 2007 at _________ A.M. CST at _________________________ (the “Meeting”).


The record date for determining stockholders entitled to receive this Information Statement has been established as the close of business on _________, 2007 (the "Record Date"). This Information Statement will be first mailed on or about _________, 2007 to stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date. As of the Record Date, there were ____________ shares of the Company's common stock outstanding and ________ shares of the Company's preferred stock outstanding. The holders of all outstanding shares of common stock are entitled to one vote per share of common stock registered in their names on the books of the Company at the close of business on the Record Date and the holders of the shares of preferred stock outstanding as of the Record Date are able to vote collectively as a group an amount of shares equal to fifty-one percent (51%) of our voting shares.


The presence at the annual meeting of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum. The Board of Directors is not aware of any matters that are expected to come before the special meeting other than the matters referred to in this Information Statement.


The matters scheduled to come before the special meeting require the approval of a majority of the votes cast at the special meeting. Valeska Energy Corp. (“Valeska”), which is controlled by William M. Simmons, the President and Director of the Company, and is majority owned by Daniel Vesco, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company, through an entity which he controls, owns (and did own as of the Record Date) all one thousand (1,000) outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, giving it the right to vote fifty-one percent (51%) of our voting shares eligible to vote at the special meeting. Additionally, Valeska beneficially owned 16,200,000 shares of our common stock; Mr. Simmons owned 1,000,000 shares of our outstanding common stock; and Mr. Vesco beneficially owned 1,000,000 shares of common stock through Asset Solutions (Hong Kong) Limited, an entity which he controls, as of the Record Date. As a result, Valeska, Mr. Simmons and Mr. Vesco (collectively the "Majority Shareholders") will be able to vote in aggregate _____________ voting shares at the Meeting, representing __________% of our voting stock as of the Record Date and will therefore be able to approve the matters presented in this Information Statement without the further vote or consent of any other of the Company’s shareholders. As such, the
Company is not soliciting your vote as the Majority Shareholders already have the vote in hand.




WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU FOR A PROXY AND
YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A PROXY.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



PROPOSAL 1


CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO AUTHORIZE 600,000,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, RE-AUTHORIZE 1,000,000 SHARES OF PREFERRED STOCK, AND TO AFFECT A NAME CHANGE TO VALTEX ENERGY CORP.


WHAT ARE THE MAJORITY SHAREHOLDERS APPROVING?


Our Majority Shareholders will approve a Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to authorize 600,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share ("Common Stock") and re-authorize 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share ("Preferred Stock").


The Certificate of Amendment will additionally state that shares of Preferred Stock of the Company may be issued from time to time in one or more series, each of which shall have such distinctive designation or title as shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company ("Board of Directors") prior to the issuance of any shares thereof. Preferred Stock shall have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and such qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated in such resolution or resolutions providing for the issue of such class or series of Preferred Stock as may be adopted from time to time by the Board of Directors prior to the issuance of any shares thereof. The number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of all the then outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of the directors (the "Voting Stock"), voting together as a single class, without a separate vote of the holders of the Preferred Stock, or any series thereof, unless a vote of any such holders is required pursuant to any Preferred Stock Designation.


Upon approval, the Board of Directors will instruct the officers to file as soon as practicable a Certificate of Amendment with the Nevada Secretary of State in a form substantially similar to the attached Appendix A to affect the amendment (the "Amendment"). The text of the proposed Amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation is subject to modification to include such changes as may be required by the office of the Nevada Secretary of State or as our Board of Directors deems necessary and advisable to affect such Amendment.


WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT?


The Amendment increases the amount of authorized common stock and is necessary to provide enhanced flexibility in the event the Board of Directors determines that it is necessary or appropriate to raise additional capital through the sale of securities, to acquire other companies or their businesses or assets, to establish strategic relationships with corporate partners, or to attract or to retain and motivate key employees. The Company has not entered into any agreements or understandings to date which would require the Company to increase its authorized shares to allow the Company to issue any additional shares of common stock; however, the Board of Directors believes it is in the best interest of the Company to increase the Company’s authorized shares of common stock to allow the Company to issue such additional shares in the future, should the need arise.


WHAT ARE SOME OF THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE AMENDMENT?


Pursuant to the Amendment, we will have 600,000,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized. As of the filing of this Information Statement, we have __________ shares of common stock issued and outstanding and 1,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock (defined and described below) issued and outstanding. As a result, our Board of Directors has the ability to issue a large number of additional shares of common stock without shareholder approval, which if issued would cause substantial dilution to our then shareholders. Additionally, shares of preferred stock may be issued by our Board of Directors without shareholder approval with voting powers, and such preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and powers as determined by our Board of Directors. Therefore, additional shares of preferred stock may be issued by our Board of Directors which cause the holders to have super majority voting power over our shares, similar to the powers provided to the holders of our Series A Preferred Stock, provide the holders of the preferred stock the right to convert the shares of preferred stock they hold into shares of our common stock, which may cause substantial dilution to our then common stock shareholders and/or have other rights and preferences greater than those of our common stock shareholders. Additionally, the dilutive effect of any preferred stock, which we may issue may be exacerbated given the fact that such preferred stock may have super majority voting rights (such as the Series A Preferred Stock) and/or other rights or preferences which could provide the preferred shareholders with voting control over us and/or provide those holders the power to prevent or cause a change in control. As a result, the issuance of additional shares of common stock and/or preferred stock may cause the value of our securities to decrease and/or become worthless in the future.


WHAT RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES WILL OUR COMMON STOCK AND PREFERRED STOCK HAVE SUBSEQUENT TO THE AMENDMENT?


COMMON STOCK:


Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to one (1) vote per share on each matter submitted to a vote of shareholders. In the event of liquidation, holders of common stock are entitled to share pro-rata in the distribution of assets remaining after payment of liabilities, if any. Holders of common stock have no cumulative voting rights. Holders of common stock have no preemptive or other rights to subscribe for shares. Holders of common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by the board of Directors out of funds legally available therefore. The outstanding shares of common stock are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




PREFERRED STOCK:


The Amendment will re-authorize the issuance of up to one million (1,000,000) shares of preferred stock, par value of $0.001 per share. We have no present plans for the issuance of any additional shares of preferred stock other than the 1,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (as described below) which we have issued to date. The issuance of additional shares of such preferred stock could adversely affect the rights of the holders of common stock and, therefore, reduce the value of the common stock. It is not possible to state the actual effect of the issuance of any additional shares of preferred stock on the rights of holders of the common stock until the board of directors determines the specific rights of the holders of the preferred stock; however, these effects may include:


- Restricting dividends on the common stock;

- Diluting the voting power of the common stock;

- Impairing the liquidation rights of the common stock; and/or

- Delaying or preventing a change in control of the company without further action by the stockholders.



SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK:


We designated one thousand (1,000) shares of Series A Preferred Stock, $.001 par value per share on or about July 17, 2007 (the "Series A Preferred Stock"). The Series A Preferred Stock have no dividend rights, no liquidation preference, and no conversion or redemption rights. However, the one thousand (1,000) shares of Series A Preferred Stock have the right, voting in aggregate, to vote on all shareholder matters equal to fifty-one percent (51%) of the total vote. For example, if there are 10,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock issued and outstanding at the time of a shareholder vote, the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, voting separately as a class, will have the right to vote an aggregate of 10,400,000 shares, out of a total number of 20,400,000 shares voting. Additionally, the Company shall not adopt any amendments to the Company's Bylaws, Articles of Incorporation, as amended, make any changes to the Certificate of Designations establishing the Series A Preferred Stock, or effect any reclassification of the Series A Preferred Stock, without the affirmative vote of at least 66-2/3% of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock. However, the Company may, by any means authorized by law and without any vote of the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, make technical, corrective, administrative or similar changes to such Certificate of Designations that do not, individually or in the aggregate, adversely affect the rights or preferences of the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock. Valeska Energy Corp., which is controlled by William M. Simmons, our President, holds all one thousand (1,000) shares of our outstanding Series A Preferred Stock.


WHAT VOTE IS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL?


The vote of a majority of the Company's shares eligible to vote at the Company's special meeting of shareholders is required to approve the Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation. Since our Majority Shareholders can vote a majority of our outstanding voting shares, our Majority Shareholders will approve the Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation as set forth above. Therefore, no further shareholder approval is sought.






THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
A VOTE "FOR" APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT
TO OUR ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION.






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




PROPOSAL 2


TO AUTHORIZE OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO AMEND OUR ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO AFFECT A REVERSE SPLIT OF OUR OUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK IN A RATIO BETWEEN 1:10 AND 1:50 AND TO RE-AUTHORIZE OUR COMMON AND PREFERRED STOCK, WITHOUT FURTHER APPROVAL OF OUR STOCKHOLDERS.


WHAT ARE THE MAJORITY SHAREHOLDERS APPROVING?


Our Majority Shareholders will approve the filing of a Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to affect a proposed reverse split of our issued and outstanding common stock in a ratio between 1:10 and 1:50 at any time after our Meeting (the "Reverse Stock Split"), and before _____________ as may be determined by our Board of Directors without further shareholder approval. Our Board of Directors believes that, because it is not possible to predict market conditions at the time the Reverse Stock Split is to be affected, it would be in the best interests of the stockholders if the board were able to determine, within specified limits approved in advance by our stockholders (i.e., between 1:10 and 1:50), the appropriate Reverse Stock Split ratio. The proposed Reverse Stock Split would combine a whole number of outstanding shares of our common stock into one (1) share of common stock, thus reducing the number of outstanding shares without any corresponding change in our par value or market capitalization. As a result, the number of shares of our common stock owned by each stockholder would be reduced in the same proportion as the reduction in the total number of shares outstanding, so that the percentage of the outstanding shares owned by each stockholder would remain unchanged.


In connection with the Reverse Stock Split, we will also re-authorize six hundred million (600,000,000) shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share and one million (1,000,000) share of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share.


After approval by our Majority Shareholders, our Board of Directors, without further shareholder approval or notice , will subsequently have the authority, in its sole discretion, to determine whether or not to proceed with a reverse split of our issued and outstanding common stock in a ratio between 1:10 and 1:50 at any time prior to _____________. If the Board of Directors determines, based on factors such as prevailing market and other relevant conditions and circumstances and the trading price of our common stock at that time, that the Reverse Stock Split is in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders, it will, in its sole discretion, affect the Reverse Stock Split, without any further shareholder approval or notice, in a ratio between 1:10 and 1:50. Following such determination, our Board of Directors will effect the Reverse Stock Split by directing management to file a Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State at such time as the board has determined is appropriate to effect the Reverse Stock Split in a form substantially similar to the attached Appendix B . The Reverse Stock Split will become effective at the time specified in the amendment to our Articles of Incorporation after its filing with the Nevada Secretary of State, which we refer to as the "Effective Time". The text of the proposed amendment to our Articles of Incorporation is subject to modification to include such changes as may be required by the office of the Nevada Secretary of State or as our Board of Directors deems necessary and advisable to affect the Reverse Stock Split.


Our Board of Directors reserves the right, even after approval by our Majority Shareholders, to forego or postpone the filing of the Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation in connection with the Reverse Stock Split, if it determines such action is not in our best interests or the best interests of our stockholders. If the Reverse Stock Split is not implemented by our Board of Directors and effected by the ____________, this Proposal 2 will be deemed abandoned, without any further effect. In this case, our Board of Directors may seek stockholder approval again, at a future date, for a Reverse Stock Split if it deems a Reverse Stock Split to be advisable at that time, but will in any case take no further action in connection with the current proposed Reverse Stock Split, without further shareholder approval.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


HOW WILL A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT AFFECT MY RIGHTS?


The completion of the Reverse Stock Split will not affect any stockholder's proportionate equity interest in our Company, except for the effect of rounding up fractional shares to a nearest whole share. For example, a stockholder who owns a number of shares that prior to the Reverse Stock Split represented one percent of the outstanding shares of the Company would continue to own one percent of our outstanding shares after the Reverse Stock Split. However, the Reverse Stock Split will have the effect of increasing the number of shares available for future issuance because of the reduction in the number of shares that will be outstanding after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split and because the amendment will also re-authorize six hundred million (600,000,000) shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share and one million (1,000,000) share of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share. Also, because the Reverse Stock Split will result in fewer shares of our common stock outstanding, the per share income/(loss), per share book value and other "per share" calculations in our quarterly and annual financial statements will be increased proportionately with the Reverse Stock Split.


WHAT ARE SOME OF THE POTENTIAL DISADVANTAGES OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT ?


Reduced Market Capitalization. While we expect that the reduction in our outstanding shares of common stock will increase the market price of our common stock, we cannot assure you that the Reverse Stock Split will increase the market price of our common stock by a factor equal to the Reverse Stock Split itself (from between 10 and 50 times, depending on what ratio of Reverse Stock Split our Board of Directors believes is in our best interests), or that such Reverse Stock Split will result in any permanent increase in the market price of our common stock, which can be dependent upon many factors, including our business and financial performance and prospects. Should the market price of our common stock decline after the Reverse Stock Split, the percentage decline may be greater, due to the smaller number of shares outstanding, than it would have been prior to the Reverse Stock Split. In some cases the stock price of companies that have affected Reverse Stock Splits has subsequently declined back to pre-reverse split levels. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the market price of our common stock immediately after the effective date of the Reverse Stock Split will be maintained for any period of time or that the ratio of post- and pre-split shares will remain the same after the Reverse Stock Split is effected, or that the Reverse Stock Split will not have an adverse effect on our stock price due to the reduced number of shares outstanding thereafter. Furthermore, a Reverse Stock Split is often viewed negatively by the market and, consequently, can lead to a decrease in our overall market capitalization. If the per share price does not increase proportionately as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, then our overall market capitalization will be reduced.


Increased Transaction Costs. The number of shares held by each individual stockholder will be reduced if the Reverse Stock Split is implemented. This will increase the number of stockholders who hold less than a "round lot," or 100 shares. Typically, the transaction costs to stockholders selling "odd lots" are higher on a per share basis. Consequently, the Reverse Stock Split could increase the transaction costs to existing stockholders in the event they wish to sell all or a portion of their shares.


Liquidity. Although our Board of Directors believes that the decrease in the number of shares of our common stock outstanding as a consequence of the Reverse Stock Split and the anticipated resulting increase in the price of our common stock could encourage interest in our common stock and possibly promote greater liquidity for our stockholders, such liquidity could also be adversely affected by the reduced number of shares outstanding after the Reverse Stock Split.


Authorized Shares; Future Financings. Upon effectiveness of the Reverse Stock Split, the number of authorized shares of common stock that are not issued or outstanding would increase. As a result, we will have an increased number of authorized but unissued shares of common stock which we may issue in financings or otherwise. If we issue additional shares, the ownership interests of our current stockholders may be diluted.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WILL FRACTIONAL SHARES BE ISSUED IN CONNECTION WITH THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT?


No. In the event a stockholder would have received a fractional share of common stock following the Reverse Stock Split, the Company will round up fractional shares to the nearest whole share. For example, a stockholder with 99 shares of common stock would receive 1 share of our common stock following a 1:100 Reverse Stock Split.


WHAT WILL THE EFFECT OF OUR REVERSE STOCK SPLIT BE ON THE VOTING RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR OUTSTANDING PREFERRED STOCK?


All shares of our outstanding Series A Preferred Stock have the right to vote in aggregate a number of voting shares equivalent to fifty-one percent (51%) of all of our voting shares on any shareholder votes. The Series A Preferred Stock does not contain any provisions for adjustment of that amount in the event of a forward or reverse stock split. As a result, the Preferred Stock will retain the right voting in aggregate, to vote on all shareholder matters equal to fifty-one percent (51%) of the total vote.


WHAT WILL THE EFFECT OF OUR REVERSE STOCK SPLIT BE ON OUR OUTSTANDING OPTIONS AND WARRANTS?


On June 1, 2006, the Company's Board of Directors approved the grant of an aggregate of 9,000,000 options to the Company's then officers and Directors, pursuant to the Company's 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). All of the options were at an exercise price of $0.13 per share, which was equal to the average of the highest ($0.125) and lowest ($0.111) quoted selling prices of the Company's common stock on June 1, 2006, multiplied by 110%. The options were granted to the following individuals in the following amounts:


o Max Maxwell, our former President and former Director was granted 750,000 qualified options and 3,250,000 non-qualified options (for 4,000,000 total options), which options were to vest at the rate of 500,000 options every three months, with the qualified options to vest first, in consideration for services rendered to the Company as the Company's president and Director. The options were to expire if unexercised on June 1, 2009, or as otherwise provided in the Option Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Cooperation Agreement and Mutual Release entered into with Mr. Maxwell on July 12, 2007, the 1,500,000 options which had vested to him as of the date he resigned from the Company, May 1, 2007, expire if unexercised at August 1, 2007;



o Frank Jacobs, our former Executive Chairman (i.e. a full-time executive officer of the Company) and former Director was granted 4,000,000 non-qualified options, which options were to vest at the rate of 500,000 options every three months, in consideration for services rendered to the Company as the Company's Director. The options expire were to expire if un-exercised on June 1, 2009, or as otherwise provided in the Option Agreement. Any of Mr. Jacobs’ stock options which have not been exercised by September 14, 2007, ninety days after his termination from the Company which occurred on June 14, 2007, will expire unexercised;



o Brian Alexander, our Chief Financial Officer and Director was granted 1,000,000 non-qualified options. The options were granted to Mr. Alexander in consideration for services rendered to the Company as the Company's Chief Financial Officer and Director. All of the options granted to Mr. Alexander have expired unexercised; and



o Mr. Terje Reiersen working as a consultant to the Company was granted 1,000,000 non-qualified options, which options were to vest at the rate of 250,000 options every three months, in consideration for consulting services to be rendered to the Company in connection with corporate advice in relation to a secondary listing amongst other things. The options were to expire if unexercised on June 1, 2009, or as otherwise provided in the Option Agreement.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Additionally, on June 1, 2006, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of 2,000,000 options to another consultant to the Company in consideration for investor relations services rendered to the Company. The options granted to the consultant were not granted pursuant to the Plan. The options have an exercise price of $0.13 per share, vest at a rate of 250,000 options every three months and expire if unexercised on June 1, 2009.


On March 28, 2006, in connection with the entry into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. (“Laurus”), we granted Laurus a Common Stock Purchase Warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 10,625,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.04 per share. The Warrant expires if unexercised at 5:00 P.M. on March 28, 2011.


On March 28, 2006, in consideration for advisory services rendered in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement entered into with Laurus, we granted Energy Capital Solutions, LLC, warrants to purchase up to 1,062,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.04 per share, which warrants expire if unexercised at 5:00 P.M. C.S.T. on March 28, 2011.


Following the Reverse Stock Split, the exercise price and number of shares issuable in connection with the exercise of such options and warrants will be adjusted in proportion to the Reverse Stock Split approved by our Board of Directors within a ratio of 1:10 and 1:50. For instance, in the event that the Board of Directors approves a 1:10 Reverse Stock Split, the Laurus Warrant will automatically adjust to have an exercise price of $0.40 per share and to be exercisable for 1,625,000 shares of common stock.


HOW WILL I EXCHANGE MY STOCK CERTIFICATES OR RECEIVE PAYMENT FOR FRACTIONAL SHARES?


Exchange of Stock Certificates:


Promptly after the Effective Time, you will be notified that the Reverse Stock Split has been affected. Our stock transfer agent, Madison Stock Transfer, Inc., whom we refer to as the "Exchange Agent", will implement the exchange of stock certificates representing post-reverse split shares of our common stock in exchange for pre-reverse split shares of our common stock from our shareholders of record. You will be asked to surrender to the Exchange Agent certificate(s) representing your pre-split shares in exchange for certificates representing your post-split shares in accordance with the procedures to be set forth in a letter of transmittal which we will send to you following the Effective Time. You will not receive a new stock certificate representing your post-split shares until you surrender your outstanding certificate(s) representing your pre-split shares, together with the properly completed and executed letter of transmittal to the Exchange Agent and any
other information or materials which the Exchange Agent may require. We will round fractional shares up to the nearest whole share.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


PLEASE DO NOT DESTROY ANY STOCK CERTIFICATE OR SUBMIT ANY OF YOUR CERTIFICATES UNTIL YOU ARE REQUESTED TO DO SO.


WHAT ARE THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT?


The federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split to our stockholders and to us are based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), applicable Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Code, judicial authority and current administrative rulings and practices of the United States Internal Revenue Service (the "Service"). Changes to the laws could alter the tax consequences, possibly with a retroactive effect. We have not sought and will not seek an opinion of counsel or a ruling from the Service regarding the federal income tax consequences of the proposed Reverse Stock Split.


We will not recognize any gain or loss as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.


WE URGE STOCKHOLDERS TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS TO DETERMINE THE PARTICULAR CONSEQUENCES TO THEM.


WHAT VOTE IS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL?


Our Majority Shareholders will approve the filing of a Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to affect a proposed Reverse Stock Split of our issued and outstanding common stock in a ratio between 1:10 and 1:50 and to re-authorize six hundred million (600,000,000) shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share and one million (1,000,000) share of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share. Therefore, no further shareholder approval is required or sought.


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT AND AMENDMENT TO OUR ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION.










--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



OTHER MATTERS


The Board of Directors does not intend to bring any other matters before the special meeting of shareholders and has not been informed that any other matters are to be presented by others.


INTEREST OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN OR OPPOSITION TO MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON:


(a) No officer or director of the Company has any substantial interest in the matters to be acted upon, other than his role as an officer or director of the Company.



(b) No director of the Company has informed the Company that he intends to oppose the action taken by the Company set forth in this information statement.



PROPOSALS BY SECURITY HOLDERS


No security holder has requested the Company to include any proposals in this information statement.


COMPANY CONTACT INFORMATION


All inquires regarding our Company should be addressed to our Company's principal executive office:


TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC.
100 Highland Park Village
Dallas, Texas 75205


Attention: Daniel Vesco
Chief Executive Officer


By Order of the Board of Directors:


/s/ Daniel Vesco
Daniel Vesco
Director
____________, 2007




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------






APPENDIX A


CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390)




Certificate Of Amendment To The Articles Of Incorporation
For Nevada Profit Corporations
(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)


1. NAME OF CORPORATION:


Texhoma Energy, Inc.


2. THE ARTICLES HAVE BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS (provide article numbers, if applicable):


Article 1. Name of Corporation is hereby amended to read:


“Article 1. Name of Corporation:


Valtex Energy Corp.”


Article 4. Number of Shares the Corporation is Authorized to Issue is hereby amended to read:


“Article 4. Number of Shares the Corporation is Authorized to Issue:


The corporation is authorized to issue Six Hundred and One Million (601,000,000) shares of stock, consisting of Six Hundred Million (600,000,000) shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share and One Million (1,000,000) shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share.


Shares of preferred stock of the corporation may be issued from time to time in one or more series, each of which shall have distinctive designation or title as shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation ("Board of Directors") prior to the issuance of any shares thereof. Preferred stock shall have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and such qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated in such resolution or resolutions providing for the issue of such class or series of preferred stock as may be adopted from time to time by the Board of Directors prior to the issuance of any shares thereof. The number of authorized shares of preferred stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of all the then outstanding shares of the capital stock of the corporation
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, without a separate vote of the holders of the preferred stock, or any series thereof, unless a vote of any such holders is required pursuant to any preferred stock designation.”




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


3. THE VOTE BY WHICH THE STOCKHOLDERS HOLDING SHARES IN THE CORPORATION ENTITLING THEM TO EXERCISE AT LEAST A MAJORITY OF THE VOTING POWER, OR SUCH GREATER PROPORTION OF THE VOTING POWER AS MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE CASE OF A VOTE BY CLASSES OR SERIES, OR AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION HAVE VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE AMENDMENT IS:
% ______


4. EFFECTIVE DATE OF FILING : ______________


5. OFFICERS SIGNATURE : ___________________






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




APPENDIX B


CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390)




Certificate Of Amendment To The Articles Of Incorporation
For Nevada Profit Corporations
(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)


1. NAME OF CORPORATION:


Valtex Energy Corp.


2. THE ARTICLES HAVE BEEN AMENDED AS FOLLOWS (provide article numbers, if applicable):


Article 4. Number of Shares the Corporation is Authorized to Issue is hereby amended to read:


“Article 4. Number of Shares the Corporation is Authorized to Issue:


The Corporation is authorized to issue Six Hundred and One Million (601,000,000) shares of stock, consisting of Six Hundred Million (600,000,000) shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share and One Million (1,000,000) shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share.


Shares of preferred stock of the Corporation may be issued from time to time in one or more series, each of which shall have distinctive designation or title as shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation ("Board of Directors") prior to the issuance of any shares thereof. Preferred stock shall have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and such qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated in such resolution or resolutions providing for the issue of such class or series of preferred stock as may be adopted from time to time by the Board of Directors prior to the issuance of any shares thereof. The number of authorized shares of preferred stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of all the then outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, without a separate vote of the holders of the preferred stock, or any series thereof, unless a vote of any such holders is required pursuant to any preferred stock designation.


Following a 1:___ reverse stock split of the Corporation’s outstanding shares of common stock, which shall be effective as of the effective date set forth below under Section 4 of this Certificate of Amendment (or in the absence of such date, on the date such Amendment is filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada) the Corporation’s capitalization will consist of Six Hundred and One Million (601,000,000) shares of stock, consisting of Six Hundred Million (600,000,000) shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share and One Million (1,000,000) shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share.”




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


3. THE VOTE BY WHICH THE STOCKHOLDERS HOLDING SHARES IN THE CORPORATION ENTITLING THEM TO EXERCISE AT LEAST A MAJORITY OF THE VOTING POWER, OR SUCH GREATER PROPORTION OF THE VOTING POWER AS MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE CASE OF A VOTE BY CLASSES OR SERIES, OR AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION HAVE VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE AMENDMENT IS:

[pokajoke0]

Hammerhart diese Meldung, dass Texhoma splittet und eine Namensänderung durchführt.

In Frankfurt sind alle Bid auf 0, keiner will mehr diese Aktie momentan

Mal sehen ob heute im Amiland der Ausverkauf oder besser gesagt der Panikverkauf beginnt. Ich denke, der Kurs wird stark fallen.

Mal sehen.

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.263.377 von pokajoke0 am 23.08.07 08:20:49

die reaktion gestern lief ja schon in diese richtung..., ein neues allzeittief

allerdings sah das nicht nach panikverkauf aus und doch wirst du sicherlich recht haben, dass der kurs bei diesen aussichten sich rasant verschlechtern wird, da die shorties doch, ungestört durch käufer, gewinne einfahren werden können.

der rs soll ohne kapitalherabsetzung stattfinden, was das bedeutet, lässt sich an unzähligen otcbb-beispielen verfolgen, rs und rasch 90% minus, wieder ein gefundenes fressen für die shorties...

was mich beeindruckt ist:

- ein ungeschönter bericht, das ende wird nicht ausgeschlossen, projektverkleinerungen
- endlich berichte aus den jahren 2004 und 2005
- die auseinanderflechtung der verschiedenen geldgeber, sicherheiten der letzten jahre mit dem ziel der konsolidierung der firma, sicher eine arbeit zum davonlaufen.., aber simmons hat sie bewältigt

was mich trifft:

- es sieht schlechter aus, als ich mir bisher eingestehen wollte
- der lange text, der zwischen den zeilen sagt, dass simmons und vesco wohl abwandern, was ihnen nicht zu verübeln wäre; simmons halte ich nach wie vor für einen fähigen mann, ohne ihn wird die firma auf jeden fall untergehen..


zu clovelly lese ich, dass alleine die absicht bestand, zu verkaufen, dass aber kein kauf erfolgte, weil tatsächlich dort zur zeit niemand bohren will
allerdings wird aus clovelly so und so kein cent heraus zu holen sein, da clovelly fast komplett verpfändet ist.

die firma ist bis auf die gnadenfrist von 6 monaten pleite

für mich sieht es so aus, dass simmons auf die karte: schonungslose wahrheit, transparenz auch in unangenehmen details setzt, um durch diese firmenpolitik investoren zu finden.

vor ein paar tagen hatte ich noch einmal kontakt mit ihm. ohne diesen bericht zu kennen habe ich ihm die frage des überlebens der firma gestellt. er beantwortete sie ungefähr:
"meine mitarbeiter und ich können auf lange sicht nur dadurch verdienen, dass wir den börsenwert der aktie steigern. wir würden unsere arbeit nicht machen, wenn wir nicht daran glauben würden"

ich glaube simmons, auch wenn er von bord gehen sollte, dann hat er bis dahin alles versucht, wie mir dieser bericht zeigt. so sind eben die risiken des geschäfts.

eine wertsteigerung von texhoma wird wohl kurzfristig nicht stattfinden. so sehe ich auch im moment keinen sinn darin, mich zu engagieren.

so long leute

roback


vielleicht eins noch, da hier doch viele mxxr interessierte lesen,
mxxr wird zu clovelly nichts anderes sagen können als texhoma, ihr wißt was das bedeutet..

[pokajoke0]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.266.455 von roback am 23.08.07 11:45:51

vielleicht ist Simons doch nicht so offenherzig. Ich habe den Bericht auch mitunter so verstanden, dass Texhoma Geld braucht um dieses Jahr überhaupt zu überstehen. Von Projekten keine Rede.
Man könnte glauben, dass die eine viel größere Leiche im Keller liegen haben als wir vermuten und Texhoma zugibt.
Vielleicht müssen die ganz von vorne Anfangen mit komplett neuen Projekten. Das würde viel Geld kosten, deshalb vielleicht die Aktienerhöhung.

Schauen wir mal heute im Amiland nach, ich sage nur Blutrot.

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.267.152 von pokajoke0 am 23.08.07 12:27:34

nein, ich glaube dass simmons die wahrheit sagt.

warum sollte er so schonungslos offenlegen, dass die firma noch für ein halbes jahr finanziell existieren kann und gleichzeitug verheimlichen, dass es nur 4 monate sind??
ergibt für mich keinen sinn..

auch die leiche im keller gibt es nicht, warum auch, sie liegt direkt vor dir, vor uns..
ich habe mich die letzten wochen mir der firma beschäftigt und nur ein wirrwarr von verflechtungs und verpfändungsverträgen vorgefunden, die hier weitgehend benannt sind und das desaster ausmachen.

zu den aussichten schreibt simmons doch ganz deutlich, dass die firma geld braucht, um weiter machen zu können, aber auch, dass sie ihre aktivitäten einschränken (muss)oder sogar einstellen muss und hier kommt für mich der eigentlich ko., dass ich lese, dass simmons und vesco sich (wahrscheinlich) von der firma zurückziehen.

ich glaube, ein staatlich bestellter insolvenzverwalter könnte nicht redlicher bericht ablegen, als das hier getan wird (und das innerhalb kürzester zeit, simmons ist ja noch nicht allzulange dabei.., er konnte sich ja eigentlich nur mit der firma beschäftigen und mit sonst nichts...)
und ich bin gespannt, ob diese haltung nicht eventuell von investoren belohnt wird.

auf jeden fall könnte sich hier mancher otcbb-betrieb eine scheibe abschneiden und nicht wie viele andere, nach dem x-ten rs mit kapitalherabsetzung auf null immer noch die tollsten versprechungen abgeben...oder sich überhaupt nicht zu wort melden....

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 31.267.152 von pokajoke0 am 23.08.07 12:27:34

das blutbad hätte ja eigentlich gestern schon stattfinden können/müssen.., ich bin auch gespannt

gruß roback

[Blindgaenger2]

ich bin froh, dass ich noch nicht mit einigen tausend Euronen eingestiegen bin..... wären schon 50 % Minus und wahrscheinlich werden es noch mehr...

[roback]

so ist es doch oft an der börse:

alle rechnen mit dem schlimmsten und was passiert?

das ding steigt...

ich war gespannt, da ich es nicht ausgeschlossen hatte, aber gerechnet hatte ich nicht damit und dennoch -

schlimm genug, nahe am allzeittief, eine frage der zeit, wann 2 nullen hinterm erscheinen

[roback]

komma

[roback]

überrascht mich doch:

auf was warten die denn? der weg nach unten ist offen...!?

[roback]

texhoma lebt noch...

und hat sogar investoren gefunden, aus der schweiz...

anscheinend gehen sie davon aus, dass ihr papier über 2 cent steigen wird, da dann optionen in aktien getauscht werden.

bin mal gespannt...

zu mxxr kein wort, aber eine leiche aus dem keller nach der anderen wird von simmons erneut massakriert, diesmal endgültig..(siehe statement vom 06.12., der böse nikolaus..)

texhoma ist noch nicht abgeschrieben, aber sicher auch kein shootingstar..

noch wer hier??

gruß, roback

[kaktus7]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.704.183 von roback am 08.12.07 17:09:05

Ich.
Leider

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.710.757 von kaktus7 am 10.12.07 07:57:45

dann sind wir also beide noch in der ölbranche aktiv..

noch wer?

[Moneymex]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.711.641 von roback am 10.12.07 10:22:35

Bin auch noch ein stiller hoffer

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.727.231 von Moneymex am 11.12.07 15:36:48

na, dann ist das ja schon ein kleines kartell..

[Moneymex]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.730.434 von roback am 11.12.07 19:19:16

Hi roback
sag mal wo steht das mit den Investoren und Optionen???
Würde ich auch gern mal lesen.
mfg aus Kiel

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.734.986 von Moneymex am 12.12.07 08:58:15

ist vom 06.12., unter yahoo.com,
wenn du dort nachschaust kannst du eine menge lesen, eine menge vergangenheitsbewältigung...


6-Dec-2007

Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Unregistered Sale of Equity Securi


ITEM 1.01. ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT.

Settlement Agreement

On or about November 28, 2007, Texhoma Energy, Inc. (the "Company", "we," and "our") entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (the "Agreement") by and between the Company, Frank A. Jacobs, our former officer and Director ("Jacobs"), and Jacobs Oil & Gas Limited, a British Columbia corporation ("JOGL" and collectively with Jacobs, the "Jacobs Parties"), Clover Capital, a creditor of the Company ("Clover"), Capersia Pte. Ltd., a Singapore company and a significant shareholder of the Company ("Capersia"), Peter Wilson, an individual and a former Director of the Company ("Wilson"), and Sterling Grant Capital, Inc., a British Columbia corporation, controlled by Mr. Wilson ("SGC" and collectively with Clover, Capersia and Wilson, the "Non-Jacobs Parties," and with the Jacobs Parties, the "Interested Parties"). We had various disputes with the Interested Parties relating to the issuances of and transfers of various shares of our common stock and various of the Interested Parties had alleged that we owed them consideration (the "Disputes"). We entered into the Agreement to settle the Disputes with the Interested Parties.

In consideration for the Company agreeing to enter into the Agreement, the Jacobs Parties agreed to the following terms: the Jacobs Parties would return to the Company for cancellation 5,000,000 of the 7,500,000 shares purchased by Jacobs in March 2006 (the "Jacobs Shares"); all debt owed by Texhoma to the Jacobs Parties, known or unknown, was discharged and forgiven, including the total outstanding amount of the approximately $500,000 Promissory Note owed to Frank A. Jacobs by the Company (the "Jacobs Note"); the Company owes Jacobs no rights to contribution and/or indemnification in connection with Jacobs employment with the Company; Jacobs agreed to certify the accuracy and correctness of the Company's previously prepared annual and interim financial statements and periodic reports, relating to the time period of his employment from approximately January 2005 to June 2007; the Jacobs Parties agreed they have no interest in and will not interfere with the issuance of or any subsequent transfers of shares to or from Lucayan Oil and Gas Investments, Ltd. (the "LOGI Shares"), a Bahamas corporation; Jacobs agreed to use his best efforts to answer the Company's questions and produce documents in the future regarding operations and financials of the Company; Jacobs agreed that he no longer holds any exercisable options of the Company; the Voting Agreement entered into between various parties in June 2007, including Jacobs, remains in full affect and force against Jacobs; and Jacobs has no interest in any shares other than the aforementioned 2,500,000 shares.

Additionally, in consideration for the Company agreeing to enter into the Agreement, the Non-Jacobs Parties agreed to the following terms: any and all debts owed by Texhoma to Clover, which purportedly totaled approximately $60,000, Capersia, which purportedly totaled $60,000 or any of the Non-Jacobs Parties (including approximately $20,000 purportedly owed to Wilson) was discharged and forgiven; the Non-Jacobs Parties agreed that they have no interest in and will not interfere with the issuance of the LOGI Shares; the Voting Agreement remains in full force and effect against Capersia; and in connection with the 30,000,000 shares of Company stock in Capersia's possession received through Texhoma's previous purchase of a 40% interest in Black Swan Petroleum Pty. Ltd. (the "Capersia Shares"), Capersia will not transfer shares in excess of 2% of Texhoma's then outstanding shares in any three (3) month period, until the second anniversary of the Agreement.

Lastly, in consideration for the Jacobs Parties and the Non-Jacobs Parties agreeing to the terms of the agreement, Texhoma agreed to the following terms:
Jacobs will retain the remaining 2,500,000 shares of Company stock and Capersia will retain the aforementioned 30,000,000 shares of Company stock free and clear of any claims to such shares by the Company; and JOGL shall retain all rights to the 200,000 shares of Morgan Creek Energy Corp. ("Morgan Creek") shares held in trust by JOGL as collateral for a promissory note issued to JOGL by the Company (the "Jacobs Note" and "Morgan Creek Shares"), the Company will release all claims to said shares or any additional shares of Morgan Creek that the Company may be due as a result of stock splits or share distributions.

Further, pursuant to the Agreement, the Interested Parties agreed to release the Company from any and all rights, obligations, claims, demands and causes of action, known or unknown, asserted or unasserted relating to the Disputes or the Company or its current or former Directors, and the Company agreed to release the Jacobs Parties and the Non-Jacobs Parties from any and all rights, obligations, claims, demands, and causes of action arising from or relating to the Capersia Shares, Jacobs' employment with the Company, the Jacobs Note, the Jacobs Shares, the Morgan Creek shares, and the LOGI Shares.

As a result of the Agreement, the Company was able to settle approximately $640,000 in debt which it purportedly owed to the various Interested Parties and to settle any and all other claims with such parties, in return for the consideration discussed above, which mainly consisted of assigning the rights to the 200,000 shares of Morgan Creek Energy Corp. stock to Frank A. Jacobs, which shares had an approximate value of $92,000 based on the trading price of Morgan Creek Energy Corp.'s common stock on the date of the Agreement of $0.46.

Sale of Units

On or about November 28, 2007, we agreed to sell $250,000 in Units (as defined below under Section 3.02) to an offshore investor, of which $125,000 were immediately sold, and an additional $125,000 were agreed to be purchased on or before December 15, 2007. The Units are described in greater detail below under
Section 3.02.

[roback]

hier die fortsetzung, da tauchen auch die schweizer auf:


ITEM 3.02. UNREGISTERED SHARES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

On or about November 28, 2007, we entered into a Subscription Agreement with Pagest Services SA, a Swiss Company, pursuant to which we agreed to sell two units consisting of $125,000 in Convertible Promissory Notes with a conversion price of $0.0125 per share, convertible at the option of Purchaser, into the Company's common stock, and Class A and Class B Warrants to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.02 and $0.03 per share, respectively, exercisable for a period of two years from the date of the Subscription Agreement (the "Units"). One Unit was sold immediately to the Purchaser, and one Unit will be sold to Purchaser on or before December 15, 2007. The Convertible Promissory Notes bear interest at the rate of 2% per annum, until paid in full, which amount will increase to 15% per annum, upon the occurrence of an Event of Default (as defined in the Convertible Promissory Notes). The Convertible Promissory Notes are due on the first anniversary of the date they are sold, with the first $125,000 in Convertible Promissory Notes being due on November 28, 2008, unless converted into shares of our common stock. In the event that our common stock trades on the market or exchange on which it then trades, at a trading price of more than $0.02 per share, for any 10 day trading period, the Convertible Promissory Note will automatically convert into shares of our common stock at the rate of one share for each $0.0125 owed to the subscriber. We also agreed to provide the subscriber piggy-back subscription rights in connection with the sale of the Units.

We claim an exemption from registration afforded by Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Regulation S") for the above issuances since the issuances were made to a non-U.S. person (as defined under Rule 902 section (k)(2)(i) of Regulation S), pursuant to an offshore transaction, and no directed selling efforts were made in the United States by us, a distributor, any respective affiliates, or any person acting on behalf of any of the foregoing.

[kaktus7]

Na ja

Wie sieht eigentlich mit der Ölsuche aus?
Findet die noch statt?

[roback]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 32.750.506 von kaktus7 am 13.12.07 08:51:26

da findet nichts statt und ist auch nichts geplant, weil das geld fehlt...

im prinzip sieht die lage umgangssprachlich so aus:

der ehemalige ceo jacobs, aus der ölförderbranche, ein hasardeur, dem geld und geschäfte nicht so am herzen lagen wie ein dicker strahl schwarzer saft aus dem bauch der erde.. nichts dergleichen gefunden (siehe in thailand) ergo schulden ohne ende und verstrickungen und möglicherweise dubiose geldabsprachen etc...

simmons, der jetzige ceo, das gegenteil, gebildet und als ökonom und schreibtischmensch darauf bedacht, den laden in den griff zu bekommen, sprich verflechtungen zu entzerren, altlasten aufzuräumen...

in dieser phase steckt texhoma nach wie vor, mit dem damoklesschwert der mangelfinanzierung und der insolvenz.

simmons sucht nach investoren und misst sein verbleiben bei txhe mit diesen vorgaben.

da möglicherweise noch anteile an potentiellem ölland bestehen (was abschließend noch geklärt werden muss, wieviel und welche, Jacobs hatte eine menge verpfändet, manches doppelt..), existiert eine geringe wahrscheinlichkeit, dass txhe mit der hilfe von investoren überlebt und neue ziele anvisiert.

fazit, die konsolidierung ist noch nicht abgeschlossen und eine ke steht an.

keine guten nachrichten. aber wenn die inso nicht kommt und simmons dabei bleibt, dann sehe ich noch land, ihn halte ich für äußerst fähig...
geht simmons, können wir alle die investition unter totalverlust abschreiben...