Tages-Trading-Chancen am Dienstag 08.04.2008 - 500 Beiträge pro Seite (Seite 2)
eröffnet am 08.04.08 07:45:30 von
neuester Beitrag 09.04.08 08:40:56 von
neuester Beitrag 09.04.08 08:40:56 von
Beiträge: 742
ID: 1.140.219
ID: 1.140.219
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 61.857
Gesamt: 61.857
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: DE0008469008 · WKN: 846900
18.080,57
PKT
+1,23 %
+219,77 PKT
Letzter Kurs 16:04:45 Xetra
Neuigkeiten
07:40 Uhr · wallstreetONLINE Redaktion |
14:49 Uhr · dpa-AFX |
14:48 Uhr · IG Europe Anzeige |
vo r 10-15 Jahren hätte man generische domainnamen noch gut abgreifen können, aber die Zeiten der domainhunter sind zur Zeit schlecht.
Oder die Zukunft handeln:
www.dax10000.de
www.dax10000.de
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.704 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 18:22:27www.einronmmachtnochkeinensommer.com
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.681 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 18:20:20keine Ahnung.
vielleicht findet sich ja doch jemand oder so ein verrückter Millionär, der dein Domain abkauft.
vielleicht findet sich ja doch jemand oder so ein verrückter Millionär, der dein Domain abkauft.
VK 0,71 TB1K3J
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.704 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 18:22:27Apropos telekom:
Hatte auf meinen Namen örtlichestelefonbuch.de registrieren lassen, hatte mich vorher abgesichert beim dpma wegen wort-und bildmarke und dem ganzen scheiss. Ich kam in teufels Küche, lange geschichte. Musste die domain rausrücken, da musste echt aufpassen...
Hatte auf meinen Namen örtlichestelefonbuch.de registrieren lassen, hatte mich vorher abgesichert beim dpma wegen wort-und bildmarke und dem ganzen scheiss. Ich kam in teufels Küche, lange geschichte. Musste die domain rausrücken, da musste echt aufpassen...
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.760 von Weg_mit_der_Telekom am 08.04.08 18:27:58Rausrücken gegen Bares ?
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.605 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 18:11:27Vodka = 0,1 oder 0,2 L
Ist bei Euch alles so klein
Alt, Vodka, ....
Ist bei Euch alles so klein
Alt, Vodka, ....
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.660 von Weg_mit_der_Telekom am 08.04.08 18:17:58Paar so Teilchen hab ich auch noch "rumliegen"
Zu Vodka stand auch noch was da:
Ein Rekordverkaufsergebnis erzielte auch die Premium-Adresse vodka.com. Sie wechselte für drei Millionen Dollar den Besitzer.
Ein Rekordverkaufsergebnis erzielte auch die Premium-Adresse vodka.com. Sie wechselte für drei Millionen Dollar den Besitzer.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.782 von KaterCarloDAX am 08.04.08 18:30:27Sind eben nicht alle so Trunkenbolde wie das Bergvolk im Süden.
---------
Ne Quatsch, aber ne ganze Flasche 0,7 L Vodka jeden Abend ist nen bißchen viel.
0,2 L reichen auch ( + Bier ).
---------
Ne Quatsch, aber ne ganze Flasche 0,7 L Vodka jeden Abend ist nen bißchen viel.
0,2 L reichen auch ( + Bier ).
Meine domain will auch keiner haben
www.staatsratszirkus.ddr
www.staatsratszirkus.ddr
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.823 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 18:34:55Früher bei ner Mugge hab ich manchmal ne halbe Flasche weggeknallt.
Jetzt wird mir nach 4 Gläschen schon übel.
Jetzt wird mir nach 4 Gläschen schon übel.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.605 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 18:11:27größer
muß helfen, ich hoffe das ding muß nicht geöffnet werden.
dann sehen wir uns erst wieder freitag
muß helfen, ich hoffe das ding muß nicht geöffnet werden.
dann sehen wir uns erst wieder freitag
@abn mafia die hier mitliest......
ohne euern ausfall heute morgen, ach seht selbst......
ohne euern ausfall heute morgen, ach seht selbst......
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.545 von Lord_Feric am 08.04.08 18:05:01mag sein
DJ IND 12.569,60 -42,83 -0,34% 12+ 0unv 18-
S&P 500 1.365,67 -6,87 -0,50% 155+ 6unv 338-
NASDAQ COMP. 2.352,03 -12,80 -0,54% 1095+ 140unv 1476-
noch nix entschieden
DJ IND 12.569,60 -42,83 -0,34% 12+ 0unv 18-
S&P 500 1.365,67 -6,87 -0,50% 155+ 6unv 338-
NASDAQ COMP. 2.352,03 -12,80 -0,54% 1095+ 140unv 1476-
noch nix entschieden
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.774 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 18:29:41ganz lange Geschichte, musste strafbewehrte Unterlassungserkl. unterschreiben usw. kam zum vollstreckbaren Beschluss des landgerichts Frankfurt. Letzten Endes kam ich mit 1200euro Strafe davon.
DeTeMedien hat die komplettte riege an anwälten aufgefahren gegen mich und meien anwalt. Keine Chance.
Der Wert der domain wurde auf 25.000 Euro festgesetzt.
Obwohl er beim dpma nicht geschützt war, musste ich die domain abgeben.
DeTeMedien hat die komplettte riege an anwälten aufgefahren gegen mich und meien anwalt. Keine Chance.
Der Wert der domain wurde auf 25.000 Euro festgesetzt.
Obwohl er beim dpma nicht geschützt war, musste ich die domain abgeben.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.894 von ortlepp am 08.04.08 18:39:55
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.909 von Weg_mit_der_Telekom am 08.04.08 18:41:06ja,
die Deutsche Telekom ist ein streitbarer Hansel....
die Deutsche Telekom ist ein streitbarer Hansel....
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.870 von Flori911 am 08.04.08 18:38:38und jetz nen stop geschenke nimmt man und macht sich nen bunten, du wolltest heute garnicht traden, mach urlaub damit.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.909 von Weg_mit_der_Telekom am 08.04.08 18:41:06Heftig !!!
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.933 von ortlepp am 08.04.08 18:43:04Immer wieder nervig, dieses zähe Geschiebe
ok...EW-mässig gerade eigenartige Situation , vorhim Impuls seit TT
das könnte gut weiter hoch gehen, genauso down... Sicherheitsgurt bei 1368,5 für die shorts , dann plus 9 und plus 1..
das könnte gut weiter hoch gehen, genauso down... Sicherheitsgurt bei 1368,5 für die shorts , dann plus 9 und plus 1..
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.977 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 18:47:04Yep, ich hab 2 komplette Ordner mit dem Scheiss.
Berühmt ist das Beispiel shell.com , wenn ich es recht erinnere?
Ein Herr Shell hat die domain auf seinen Namen registrieren lassen.
Aber es gibt ja noch nen Ölmulti gleichen Namens. Gibt viele solcher Geschichten.
Berühmt ist das Beispiel shell.com , wenn ich es recht erinnere?
Ein Herr Shell hat die domain auf seinen Namen registrieren lassen.
Aber es gibt ja noch nen Ölmulti gleichen Namens. Gibt viele solcher Geschichten.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.984 von Lord_Feric am 08.04.08 18:47:34bin und bleibe LONG
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.681 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 18:20:20Antike Pin-Up Fresken? Möglicherweise aus dem untergegangenen Pompeii?
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.964 von Tellerwscher73 am 08.04.08 18:45:4950 % off + 150 rest stop +110........
und nun sport und feierabend......usd yen schnibbler mit + 6 weg ........
tschööööööööööööööö
und nun sport und feierabend......usd yen schnibbler mit + 6 weg ........
tschööööööööööööööö
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.909 von Weg_mit_der_Telekom am 08.04.08 18:41:06Weißt noch, von welcher Kanzlei ?
Bruckhaus / Westrick ?
Freshfield / Bruckhaus / Deringer ?
Hengeler / Müller ?
Bruckhaus / Westrick ?
Freshfield / Bruckhaus / Deringer ?
Hengeler / Müller ?
Jetzt aber hopp, hopp über die 12600, hab auf 6820 im Daxi gesetzt.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.021 von ortlepp am 08.04.08 18:50:36btw: usd cad könntest du shorten......
würde auch zu indices weiter up passen.......
schaus dir mal an
würde auch zu indices weiter up passen.......
schaus dir mal an
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.838.909 von Weg_mit_der_Telekom am 08.04.08 18:41:06sowas in der art kenne ich auch. versuchst dich als kleiner mann in deutschland kannste schnell probleme bekommen und das ohne bewußt kriminell zu sein, versuchst was auf diew beine zu stellen und schon biste ganz schnell kriminell gibt aber keine vorwarnung und du mußt zahlen. ich bin deutschland.
Die Aktienanleger werden immer weniger...
Wer kauft eigentlich Aktien?
Die geheimen Zirkel...
Wer kauft eigentlich Aktien?
Die geheimen Zirkel...
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.028 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 18:51:08Danckelmann und Kerst, Opernplatz 14, Frankfurt/Main.
So finito jetzt damit.
So finito jetzt damit.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.071 von zenkey1 am 08.04.08 18:55:19Vorstände und Aufsichtsräte in geheimer mission.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.071 von zenkey1 am 08.04.08 18:55:19
ich kaufe noch Aktien. Letztes Jahr Ende Dezember Münchner Rück, dieses Jahr RBS - als Langfristanlage!
ich kaufe noch Aktien. Letztes Jahr Ende Dezember Münchner Rück, dieses Jahr RBS - als Langfristanlage!
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.097 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 18:58:14machst du auch daytrading? oder so für 1-3 tage?
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.117 von Tellerwscher73 am 08.04.08 19:00:53ja!
long kk 0,66 TB1K3J
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.097 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 18:58:14Habe gelesen die Aktienbesitzquote liegt z.Z. bei 5,2% und damit dem tiefsten stand seit 1982!!! Im AMILAND WIRD DAS NICHT anders sein..
NK Long 0,62 TB1K3J
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.136 von zenkey1 am 08.04.08 19:02:34ein gutes Zeichen?,...wenn ja, dann verkaufe ich alle meine Aktien nicht unter Dax 12000!
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.130 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 19:02:05dann schreib doch hier dazu was, siehe thread- titel, langfistposis ab und an ist ja auch o.k.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.047 von Flori911 am 08.04.08 18:53:03yupp, die kleine erholung eben
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.163 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 19:05:35Schlechtes Zeichen >Weil am Markt vorbei produziert wird!
Die 6755 im Dax hält wie eine Betonwand.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.187 von Tellerwscher73 am 08.04.08 19:07:46wieso, verstehe dich nicht. ich denke, es ist bekannt, dass ich Knock-out-Scheine trade. Hab schon hier oft die screens reingestellt.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.246 von kaju66 am 08.04.08 19:14:15wenn das so bleibt, dannn gehts morgen durch die 6755 wie Butter
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.254 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 19:14:59ich scheiß auf screens, hier gehts um tageschancen, halte mich auch nicht immer dran. aber du schreibst was von 12000. warte noch auf eine antwort von dir, ansonsten ende im gelände. ist nicht bös gemeint.
Flop 5 DJ Ind >
Name Proz.
Citigroup Inc.... -2,70%
Intel Corp. Re... -2,11%
Verizon Commun... -2,03%
Pfizer Inc. Re... -2,00%
Disney Co., Th... -1,63%
Name Proz.
Citigroup Inc.... -2,70%
Intel Corp. Re... -2,11%
Verizon Commun... -2,03%
Pfizer Inc. Re... -2,00%
Disney Co., Th... -1,63%
Der Markt braucht langlebige Güter > Damit werden in Zeiten von Armut in einer breiten Bevölkerungsschicht Gewinne erzielt > Reiche kaufen nur ein Auto und tragen nur einen Anzug und die gegen nur einmal Essen am Tag!
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.276 von neubert03 am 08.04.08 19:18:27
Man ist das zäh und das um diese Zeit.
2. posi mal raus 707,6
Der Markt braucht langlebige Güter > Damit werden in Zeiten von Armut in einer breiten Bevölkerungsschicht Gewinne erzielt > Reiche kaufen nur ein Auto und tragen nur einen Anzug und die gehen einmal am Tag Essen > gegen wurde korrigiert
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.326 von kaju66 am 08.04.08 19:23:32tja, bin selbst ratlos. Hab mein SL bei 6738 drinne. Jetzt müss mer mal gucken, nich wahr :-)
SL auf 1367,5 runter...ohne RX-Fear würde ich sagen das semmelt ordentlich weg
dow testet noch mal das TT..
Ich weis auch nicht, aber irgendwie sieht das alles nach "eher" short aus, oder sehe ich das falsch.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.441 von bam_bam am 08.04.08 19:35:38Iss zurück und nachgelegt
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.387 von neubert03 am 08.04.08 19:30:17Hast fragen? Volkswirtschaftlich kann ich helfen...
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.302 von Tellerwscher73 am 08.04.08 19:20:55um erfolgreich zu traden sollte man tunlichst vermeiden"tagesweise" zu (denken)traden,...denn hin und her macht die taschen leer, hab schon selbst leider meinen Erfahrung gemacht. Und ausserdem habe ich oft meine bestehende Longposition begründet, da jederzeit plötzlich eine Trendwendekehr nach oben kommen könnte. Deswegen traue ich mich nicht aktuell short zu traden.
Kommen denn heut noch irgendwelche wichtigen Ausführung weil der Markt sich kaum bewegt ?
Vielleicht weiß berni Bescheid.
Vielleicht weiß berni Bescheid.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.482 von Standuhr am 08.04.08 19:39:59*20:00 US/Offenmarktausschuss der Notenbank (FOMC), Protokoll der
Sitzung vom 18. März, Washington
Sitzung vom 18. März, Washington
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.465 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 19:38:18gilt nur für unerfahne trader wie mich. Möchte hier keinen Profi-Trader wie Bernie, KCD und viele andere nicht irgendwie beleidigen.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.459 von zenkey1 am 08.04.08 19:37:45geh mir blos weg mit VWL, den Schrott hab ich lange genug "gefressen"
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.482 von Standuhr am 08.04.08 19:39:59Still on deck is the release of minutes from the last Federal Reserve rate-setting meeting on March 18, when the benchmark federal funds rate was reduced by three-quarters of a percentage point. The minutes will be released at 2 p.m. Eastern.
"With the Fed in crisis-management mode, what happens next with the already-low funds rate is not important," said Tony Crescenzi, chief bond market strategist at Miller Tabak & Co.
"The only information that would intrigue would be any ideas that the Fed indicates for crisis scenarios
"With the Fed in crisis-management mode, what happens next with the already-low funds rate is not important," said Tony Crescenzi, chief bond market strategist at Miller Tabak & Co.
"The only information that would intrigue would be any ideas that the Fed indicates for crisis scenarios
Kommen denn heut noch irgendwelche wichtigen Ausführung weil der Markt sich kaum bewegt ?
Vielleicht weiß berni Bescheid.
Wurde zur Kenntnis genommen...
Vielleicht weiß berni Bescheid.
Wurde zur Kenntnis genommen...
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.465 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 19:38:18Hi,
um erfolgreich zu traden sollte man tunlichst vermeiden"tagesweise" zu (denken)traden
Wieso stellst du das als so als Fakt dar?
Das musst du mir näher erklären, meinst mit tageweise "Tag für Tag" oder "über Tage"?
Falls du meinst jeden Tag einzeln zu traden sollte man vermeiden, dann hast du glaube ich die große Mehrheit in diesem Thread gegen dich in dem Punkt.
um erfolgreich zu traden sollte man tunlichst vermeiden"tagesweise" zu (denken)traden
Wieso stellst du das als so als Fakt dar?
Das musst du mir näher erklären, meinst mit tageweise "Tag für Tag" oder "über Tage"?
Falls du meinst jeden Tag einzeln zu traden sollte man vermeiden, dann hast du glaube ich die große Mehrheit in diesem Thread gegen dich in dem Punkt.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.499 von bam_bam am 08.04.08 19:41:54Dann kümmt das Feuerwerk, hatte eigentlich vorher schon mit ner kurzen Reaktion gerechnet.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.501 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 19:41:57Hast schon selbst entschärft, dann hat sich mein obiges Posting erübrigt.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.456 von kaju66 am 08.04.08 19:37:19Immer noch Abwärtstrend an der Trendoberkante !!!! ??? Die Spanne "siehe Bild" wird immer enger !!! mal sehen was im Dreieck passiert .... Ausbruch nach oben oder unten !!!
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.537 von grgrgr am 08.04.08 19:44:09will be released at 2 p.m. Eastern.
Bisschen aktueller wäre mir lieber :-?
Bisschen aktueller wäre mir lieber :-?
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.572 von neubert03 am 08.04.08 19:47:05...jo, mir auch, keine Ahnung was da Neues drin stehen soll für ne Wunderkerze um 20Uhr.....vielleicht hat hier jemand mehr input...
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.572 von neubert03 am 08.04.08 19:47:0520 Uhr deutscher Zeit.
Im übrigen:
http://www.derivatecheck.de/termine/default.asp
Im übrigen:
http://www.derivatecheck.de/termine/default.asp
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.553 von Unterhaendler am 08.04.08 19:45:38ich meinte den ständigen Wechsel zwischen Long/Short am Tag/Stunden/Minuten.
Heute noch 12680-12700 im Dow
Boh ... langweilig das Geschiebe .... Wo wird es nun hingehen. ??!? Einer eine Idee ...
Heute noch 12680-12700 im Dow.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.465 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 19:38:18ja, ist o.k. schau dir bitte nochmal die thread-überschrift an. tages-trading-chancen.
reicht jetzt o.k.
reicht jetzt o.k.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.642 von Tellerwscher73 am 08.04.08 19:55:32hab nur deine antwort beantwortet.
ich hab auch gestern z.B CFDs getradet. Bin short gegangen - kann dir gerne auf Wunsch screen reinstellen.
Dann stellt mir in Zukunft keine Fragen"!!
ich hab auch gestern z.B CFDs getradet. Bin short gegangen - kann dir gerne auf Wunsch screen reinstellen.
Dann stellt mir in Zukunft keine Fragen"!!
kommt auf die minutes (das FED statement) drauf an... gleich wissen wir mehr
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.670 von Miamibeach am 08.04.08 19:59:19 statement kommt nicht gut an...
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.599 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 19:50:19Auch das kommt darauf an. Ein Tageschart unterscheidet sich vom Chart her nicht von 5-/15-Min-Charts. Z.B. kann man mehrmals an Unt./Wid. (womöglich aus dem Tageschart sogar) long/short gehen. Nur ist das Ziel natürlich kleiner.
Naja, genug dazu.
Naja, genug dazu.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.690 von Michael71 am 08.04.08 20:01:20abwarten, läuft an
[20:00:50] *FED/MINUTES: AUSSICHTEN AUF LANGSAMERES WACHSTUM UND HÖHERE INFLATION
[20:00:58] [DJ] Fed/Protokoll: Feinadjustierung der Geldpolitik schwierig
[20:01:42] [DJ] Fed: US-Wirtschaft könnte in 1. Jahreshälfte 2008 schrumpfen
[20:02:06] [DJ] Fed: Größere Unsicherheit über Inflationsausblick
[20:02:27] *FED/MINUTES/EINIGE MITGLIEDER: LÄNGERER UND ERNSTER ABSCHWUNG MÖGLICH
[20:00:58] [DJ] Fed/Protokoll: Feinadjustierung der Geldpolitik schwierig
[20:01:42] [DJ] Fed: US-Wirtschaft könnte in 1. Jahreshälfte 2008 schrumpfen
[20:02:06] [DJ] Fed: Größere Unsicherheit über Inflationsausblick
[20:02:27] *FED/MINUTES/EINIGE MITGLIEDER: LÄNGERER UND ERNSTER ABSCHWUNG MÖGLICH
[20:00:50] *FED/MINUTES: AUSSICHTEN AUF LANGSAMERES WACHSTUM UND HÖHERE INFLATION
[20:00:58] [DJ] Fed/Protokoll: Feinadjustierung der Geldpolitik schwierig
[20:01:42] [DJ] Fed: US-Wirtschaft könnte in 1. Jahreshälfte 2008 schrumpfen
[20:02:06] [DJ] Fed: Größere Unsicherheit über Inflationsausblick
[20:02:27] *FED/MINUTES/EINIGE MITGLIEDER: LÄNGERER UND ERNSTER ABSCHWUNG MÖGLICH
[20:00:58] [DJ] Fed/Protokoll: Feinadjustierung der Geldpolitik schwierig
[20:01:42] [DJ] Fed: US-Wirtschaft könnte in 1. Jahreshälfte 2008 schrumpfen
[20:02:06] [DJ] Fed: Größere Unsicherheit über Inflationsausblick
[20:02:27] *FED/MINUTES/EINIGE MITGLIEDER: LÄNGERER UND ERNSTER ABSCHWUNG MÖGLICH
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.642 von Tellerwscher73 am 08.04.08 19:55:32#579 von Tellerwscher73 08.04.08 19:55:32 Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.642
Dieses Posting: versenden | melden | drucken | Antwort schreiben | DAX (PERFORMANCEINDEX)
Folgende Antwort bezieht sich auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.465 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 19:38:18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ja, ist o.k. schau dir bitte nochmal die thread-überschrift an. tages-trading-chancen.
reicht jetzt o.k.
----------> halt deinbe schnauze
nabend ät all
Dieses Posting: versenden | melden | drucken | Antwort schreiben | DAX (PERFORMANCEINDEX)
Folgende Antwort bezieht sich auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.465 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 19:38:18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ja, ist o.k. schau dir bitte nochmal die thread-überschrift an. tages-trading-chancen.
reicht jetzt o.k.
----------> halt deinbe schnauze
nabend ät all
[20:02:38] [DJ] Fed: Einige FOMC-Mitglieder sehen ernsten Abschwung
[20:04:17] *FED/MINUTES/MEISTE MITGLIEDER: SUBSTANTIELLE ABSCHWÄCHUNG SICHER
[20:04:17] *FED/MINUTES/MEISTE MITGLIEDER: SUBSTANTIELLE ABSCHWÄCHUNG SICHER
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.712 von FrankHerres am 08.04.08 20:03:05ok...und im klartext
wieviele sind für einen weiteren massiven zinschritt nach unten und wieviele waren dagegen ?
wieviele sind für einen weiteren massiven zinschritt nach unten und wieviele waren dagegen ?
Long ist angesagt, dont fight the FED !!
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.691 von Unterhaendler am 08.04.08 20:01:25da habt ihr am samstag aber glück gehabt
aber gut für schalke(die wie immer in dieser saison besch.... spielen)
wollte dich schon zur sau machen...wenn es bei 0:1 geblieben wär
aber gut für schalke(die wie immer in dieser saison besch.... spielen)
wollte dich schon zur sau machen...wenn es bei 0:1 geblieben wär
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.669 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 19:59:18sorry. hattest das hier geschriben, hatte nur deine kursziele gelesen, die heute auf freitag verschoben wurden.
ist o.k. antworte wieder wenn ich was erkenne.
ist o.k. antworte wieder wenn ich was erkenne.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.721 von regenkobold am 08.04.08 20:04:28ER wieder.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.740 von kaju66 am 08.04.08 20:06:12sehe ich auch...ganz nach dem motto nun ist´s raus ..kanns noch schlimmer werden ?
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.739 von Miamibeach am 08.04.08 20:06:10heute ist nichts mit zinsen aendern...
@ Tellerscher
was machst du eigentlich hier?, tradest du überhaupt? dann stellt doch screens rein. Wenn du magst kann ich gerne meine von gestern hier
reinstellen.
Während ich meine Positionen beobachte, vertreibe ich mir die Zeit hier am Tagestread.
was machst du eigentlich hier?, tradest du überhaupt? dann stellt doch screens rein. Wenn du magst kann ich gerne meine von gestern hier
reinstellen.
Während ich meine Positionen beobachte, vertreibe ich mir die Zeit hier am Tagestread.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.756 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 20:07:38schreibe ich normale.....gehe ich im sräd unter
lol, fürn nen marketmover gehts ja ab wie ein zäpfchen................
Scheint den Bären als Nahrung zu reichen, das Protokoll, Nasi schon unter TT, SUP auch fast
Gleich sagen sich die notorisch positiven Amis " Ist doch alles garnicht so schlimm ".
mal schauen ob im dow die 12535 haelt
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.763 von Miamibeach am 08.04.08 20:08:20Erster Eindruck verdaut, nachgedacht und uppppp.
[20:24:17] *FED: fällt der oelpreis nicht schleunigst auf 70 $.. ist ein crash nict mehr zu vermeiden
mann achte auf die uhrzeit
mann achte auf die uhrzeit
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.721 von regenkobold am 08.04.08 20:04:28du hast mir gerade noch gefehlt
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.815 von Tellerwscher73 am 08.04.08 20:12:59deshalb bin ich doch gekommen
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.750 von regenkobold am 08.04.08 20:06:58Hinten raus sind wir immer gut! Bisschen Glück kann auch nicht schaden. War zwar n grotten Kick, aber dennoch verdienter Sieg, Lev hat aus 0 Chancen 1 Tor gemacht.
Dortmund wird immer besser und spielen zuweil sogar Fussball Wenn nur die Aussetzer nicht wären
Letzten 4 SPiele (HSV, KSC, Bochum, Lev) hätten vom Spiel her alles Siege sein müssen, aber die Unfähigkeit hinten
Wir steigern uns fürs Finale!
Genieße Platz 2, lange bleibt ihr nicht da! Und wie ihr mit Slomka umgeht!
Dortmund wird immer besser und spielen zuweil sogar Fussball Wenn nur die Aussetzer nicht wären
Letzten 4 SPiele (HSV, KSC, Bochum, Lev) hätten vom Spiel her alles Siege sein müssen, aber die Unfähigkeit hinten
Wir steigern uns fürs Finale!
Genieße Platz 2, lange bleibt ihr nicht da! Und wie ihr mit Slomka umgeht!
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.813 von regenkobold am 08.04.08 20:12:50
Heut sans ja Grepel verreckte.
Da warten alle auf up und ne Kerze.
Nun laßt euch nicht so lange bitten !
Da warten alle auf up und ne Kerze.
Nun laßt euch nicht so lange bitten !
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.813 von regenkobold am 08.04.08 20:12:50lol.....70!!!.......
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.828 von Unterhaendler am 08.04.08 20:14:10wir hatten letztens noch darüber gesprochen... nie vor spielschluß den platz verlassen
so wie schalke spielt..... würde ich sagen... sie stehen auf platz 12-15
platz 2 ist ein traum
was ist mit slomka
der bringt doch keine linie oder ein erkennbares system ins spiel er ist schlichtweg überfordert
so wie schalke spielt..... würde ich sagen... sie stehen auf platz 12-15
platz 2 ist ein traum
was ist mit slomka
der bringt doch keine linie oder ein erkennbares system ins spiel er ist schlichtweg überfordert
Also mir ist es recht wenn es runter gehen sollte.
Halt mal allen shortis nen Daumen.
Selbst bin ich flat. Da sagt sich das leicht in jede Richtung.
Halt mal allen shortis nen Daumen.
Selbst bin ich flat. Da sagt sich das leicht in jede Richtung.
und nun ? einer ne idee wo die reise heute endet ?
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.889 von Standuhr am 08.04.08 20:21:39Um 21 Uhr fällt denen auf, das die FED an sich nichts neues gesagt hat.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.770 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 20:08:56ja stell ma rein hast du davon was gepostet null, also bringt mir das nichsts.
ich schreibe hier paar einstige, aber ehrlich gesagt vergeht mir die lust. bekommst von mir screens sag an welche du brauchst.
ps: nen nachher gesendeter screen wie toll ich doch war bringt mir nichts, vielleicht anerkennung. (kurzfristig)
oder mal was zur darstellung, das ist o.k. oder übelste freude auch o.k. da freue ich mich wie sau mit. aber dax 12000 find ich scheiße.
denke aber das ganze interessiert dich nicht, sende sreens, sind mir eigentlich latte und dann sagst du mir welche sreens du von mir haben möchtest. außer screens wird nichts mehr kommen in deine richtung. punkt
ich schreibe hier paar einstige, aber ehrlich gesagt vergeht mir die lust. bekommst von mir screens sag an welche du brauchst.
ps: nen nachher gesendeter screen wie toll ich doch war bringt mir nichts, vielleicht anerkennung. (kurzfristig)
oder mal was zur darstellung, das ist o.k. oder übelste freude auch o.k. da freue ich mich wie sau mit. aber dax 12000 find ich scheiße.
denke aber das ganze interessiert dich nicht, sende sreens, sind mir eigentlich latte und dann sagst du mir welche sreens du von mir haben möchtest. außer screens wird nichts mehr kommen in deine richtung. punkt
...solange die Form der Meinungsbildung andauert geht ein short raus bei 1362,5 mit plus 7....der von 1377 bleibt mal für "schlechte Zeiten" und den CRASH bei 110 für crude
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.893 von Miamibeach am 08.04.08 20:22:09in miamibeach
kann dass sein dass beim dow die naechste unterstuetzung bei ca. 12300 liegt?
NK 0,52
DJ IND 12.572,78 -39,65 -0,31% 14+ 0 16-
S&P 500 1.365,54 -7,00 -0,51% 174+ 1 324-
NASDAQ COMP. 2.348,95 -15,88 -0,67% 1065+ 128 1580-
finde es ist nich recht ausgeglichen,,,
allerdings DOW nix vortagesniveau geschafft
allerdings die "richtigen" verlierer -> banken/vers.
Flop 5 DJ Ind >
Name Proz.
Citigroup Inc.... -3,98%
Bank of Americ... -2,48%
American Inter... -2,48%
Intel Corp. Re... -2,29%
Pfizer Inc. Re... -2,19%
...also DOWN ... IMHO
S&P 500 1.365,54 -7,00 -0,51% 174+ 1 324-
NASDAQ COMP. 2.348,95 -15,88 -0,67% 1065+ 128 1580-
finde es ist nich recht ausgeglichen,,,
allerdings DOW nix vortagesniveau geschafft
allerdings die "richtigen" verlierer -> banken/vers.
Flop 5 DJ Ind >
Name Proz.
Citigroup Inc.... -3,98%
Bank of Americ... -2,48%
American Inter... -2,48%
Intel Corp. Re... -2,29%
Pfizer Inc. Re... -2,19%
...also DOWN ... IMHO
Sonic komm doch zurück *snief
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.854 von grgrgr am 08.04.08 20:16:52 siiiiiiesssse.oel fällt
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.913 von neubert03 am 08.04.08 20:23:56mensch NEUBS, NIE nachkaufen wenns gg dich läuft
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.867 von regenkobold am 08.04.08 20:17:55Er hat euch den größten Erfolg (CL-1/4 Finale)der Vereinsgeschichte geholt (Naja, nach 97) und wäre vernatwortlich für die erste Meisterschaft, wenn die Mannschaft letztes Jahr am Ende der Saison nicht so eingebrochen wäre (Bochum, Dortmund z.b.).
Und dann wird er vom Vorstand/Fans/Umfeld so diskreditiert, das finde ich nicht ok. Auch wenn er Fehler hat, er selbst ist noch in der Entwicklung und hat großes geleistet bei eurem "Sauhaufen".
Sollen wir eine Wette abschließen? Kuranyi das Großmaul fährt nicht mit zu EM und wenn doch, nur als Tribünengast! Ok?
Und dann wird er vom Vorstand/Fans/Umfeld so diskreditiert, das finde ich nicht ok. Auch wenn er Fehler hat, er selbst ist noch in der Entwicklung und hat großes geleistet bei eurem "Sauhaufen".
Sollen wir eine Wette abschließen? Kuranyi das Großmaul fährt nicht mit zu EM und wenn doch, nur als Tribünengast! Ok?
Guten Abend!
Es kommt Bewegung in die schwarze Pampe.
G007
Es kommt Bewegung in die schwarze Pampe.
G007
sell yen,...buy indices
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.937 von LBR am 08.04.08 20:26:10Wollte gerade fragen, wo das lbr - S&P Paniclevel ist.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.934 von Unterhaendler am 08.04.08 20:25:58ohne S wären wir letztes jahr meister geworden......... in dortmund ...spätestens
und wechhhhhhhhhhhhh
und wechhhhhhhhhhhhh
:O
maaaannn, ist das ein zeitlupen movement.
der bursche hengt da wie ein seekranker über der rheling und will einfach nicht über bord gehen
maaaannn, ist das ein zeitlupen movement.
der bursche hengt da wie ein seekranker über der rheling und will einfach nicht über bord gehen
Mal was ganz Neues nach News: Keine angetäuschte Richtung, keine Hektik, nur ein gleichmäßiger, langsamer, aber beinahe volafreier Abverkauf
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.825 von regenkobold am 08.04.08 20:14:02deshalb bin ich doch gekommen
ist doch schön und das in deinem alter
ist doch schön und das in deinem alter
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.937 von LBR am 08.04.08 20:26:10deine posting- und tradeanzahl korrelieren entsprechend im moment
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.950 von ditano am 08.04.08 20:28:00Bissl Gegenwind übersteht der doch, kommt kein Orkan auf.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.948 von regenkobold am 08.04.08 20:27:49Hier geblieben! So eine unsachliche Antwort kann ich nicht akzeptieren!
Bis denn
Bis denn
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.937 von LBR am 08.04.08 20:26:10
meinscht der doppelbottom hält im dow?
meinscht der doppelbottom hält im dow?
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.987 von ditano am 08.04.08 20:31:53hab ich auch gesehen, meine indikatoren sagen eher noch stock tiefer. muss aba nitt. habe eh kleine posi größe. läuft mies im moment
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.950 von ditano am 08.04.08 20:28:00der bursche hengt da wie ein seekranker über der rheling und will einfach nicht über bord gehen
Der Sonic hat einen Bunker in Südfrankreich... warum wurde Sonic gesperrt?
Der Sonic hat einen Bunker in Südfrankreich... warum wurde Sonic gesperrt?
wodonig auf bloomberg ist auch grad neben der rolle...
U.S. Federal Reserve Meeting Minutes for March 18 (Text)
April 8 (Bloomberg) -- Following are the minutes of the Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee meeting that concluded on March 18.
A meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee was held in the offices of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, March 18, 2008 at 8:30 a.m. Present: Mr. Bernanke, Chairman Mr. Geithner, Vice Chairman Mr. Fisher Mr. Kohn Mr. Kroszner Mr. Mishkin Ms. Pianalto Mr. Plosser Mr. Stern Mr. Warsh
Messrs. Evans, Lacker, and Lockhart, and Ms. Yellen, Alternate Members of the Federal Open Market Committee
Messrs. Hoenig and Rosengren, Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks of Kansas City and Boston, respectively
Mr. Sapenaro, First Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Mr. Madigan, Secretary and Economist Ms. Danker, Deputy Secretary Mr. Skidmore, Assistant Secretary Ms. Smith, Assistant Secretary Mr. Alvarez, General Counsel Mr. Ashton, Assistant General Counsel Mr. Sheets, Economist Mr. Stockton, Economist
Messrs. Connors, English, and Kamin, Ms. Mester, Messrs. Rolnick, Rosenblum, Slifman, Sniderman, and Wilcox, Associate Economists
Mr. Dudley, Manager, System Open Market Account
Mr. Struckmeyer, Deputy Staff Director, Office of Staff Director for Management, Board of Governors
Mr. Parkinson, Deputy Director, Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors
Ms. Bailey, Deputy Director, Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation, Board of Governors
Mr. Clouse, Deputy Director, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Ms. Liang and Messrs. Reifschneider and Wascher, Associate Directors, Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors
Mr. Gagnon, Visiting Associate Director, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Mr. Blanchard, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members, Board of Governors
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Director, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Mr. Small, Project Manager, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Mr. Luecke, Section Chief, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Ms. Low, Open Market Secretariat Specialist, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Mr. Judd, Executive Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Messrs. Altig, Rasche, Sellon, and Sullivan, Senior Vice Presidents, Federal Reserve Banks of Atlanta, St. Louis, Kansas City, and Chicago, respectively
Mr. Olivei, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
Mr. Pesenti, Assistant Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Mr. Hetzel, Senior Economist, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
The Manager of the System Open Market Account reported on recent developments in foreign exchange markets. There were no open market operations in foreign currencies for the System's account in the period since the previous meeting. The Manager also reported on developments in domestic financial markets and on System open market operations in government securities and federal agency obligations during the period since the previous meeting. By unanimous vote, the Committee ratified these transactions.
The information reviewed at the March meeting indicated that economic activity had continued to decelerate in recent months. The contraction in homebuilding intensified, consumer spending appeared to be weakening, and survey measures of both consumer and business sentiment were at depressed levels. Industrial production fell in February, and private payroll employment posted a third consecutive monthly decline. After having increased in recent months through January, both headline and core inflation as measured by the consumer price index (CPI) dropped noticeably in February. In early March, however, prices of oil and other commodities rose sharply.
Labor demand softened markedly in recent months. The decline in private payroll employment that began last December steepened through February. Although employment by firms in the nonbusiness services sector and in state and local governments continued to rise, declines elsewhere were widespread. Losses were greatest in the manufacturing, construction, and retail trade sectors. Aggregate hours of private production or nonsupervisory workers fell slightly in the first two months of the year. The unemployment rate edged down to 4.8 percent in February, but was still up from the 4.5 percent rate of a year earlier. The labor force participation rate declined in February.
Industrial production declined in February after edging up slightly in the previous two months. The output of utilities dropped back after a weather-related surge in January, while mining output fell somewhat in the first two months of the year on average. Manufacturing production edged down after having flattened out in January. The motor vehicle and construction- related industries continued to hold down overall manufacturing output even as high-tech production posted moderate increases. The factory utilization rate edged down in February to a level noticeably below its recent high in the third quarter of 2007.
Real consumer spending appeared to have stalled in recent months. Real outlays for nondurable and durable consumer goods, including automobiles, were estimated to have declined, on average, in January and February. Real disposable personal income was unchanged in the fourth quarter, held down by higher food and energy prices, and moved up only slightly in January. Further declines in house prices led to a noticeable decrease in the ratio of household wealth to disposable income in the fourth quarter. The downturn in equity prices since December further reduced household wealth in the first quarter. Readings on consumer sentiment dropped sharply in February from already low levels, and the Reuters/University of Michigan survey remained at a depressed level in early March.
The contraction in residential construction continued into early 2008. Single-family housing starts fell in both January and February. After having dropped especially sharply in December, multifamily housing starts rebounded somewhat in the first two months of the year. New home sales declined again in January, thereby pushing inventories of unsold homes to even higher levels relative to sales. Sales of existing homes held roughly steady in January, and the index of pending sales agreements in that month was consistent with flat sales in February and March. Overall, demand for housing continued to be restrained by tight financing conditions for jumbo and nonprime mortgages.
Real spending on equipment and software rose at a sluggish rate in the fourth quarter. In January, orders and shipments of nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft were above their fourth-quarter levels. However, the overall outlook for capital spending in the first quarter was weak in light of the deterioration in surveys of business conditions and attitudes and the worsening situation in markets for business finance. On the heels of robust gains during most of last year, nominal spending on nonresidential structures decelerated in December and posted an outright decline in January. Although spending in this sector is often volatile, the recent deceleration was consistent with mounting indications of slowing demand for nonresidential buildings and tightening credit conditions.
Real investment in nonfarm inventories excluding motor vehicles remained at a steady pace in the fourth quarter of 2007, but motor vehicle inventories fell sharply. After declining in November, the ratio of manufacturing and trade book-value inventories (excluding motor vehicles) to sales ticked up in December and held steady in January, but this ratio remained well below its average value in 2007.
The U.S. international trade deficit narrowed substantially in December and was about unchanged in January. Exports rose sharply in both months, while imports dipped in December before recovering in January. Increases in exports were broadly based except for automotive exports, which dropped sharply in December and remained low in January. Imports of services were up moderately. Oil imports soared, reflecting increases in both prices and volumes. Most other categories of imports dropped in December and January on net, with especially large declines in imports of automotive and consumer goods.
In the major advanced foreign economies, the rate of growth of real gross domestic product (GDP) generally declined in the fourth quarter. The source of the slowdown varied substantially across economies. In the euro area and in the United Kingdom, output was restrained by a softening in domestic demand. In contrast, Canadian domestic demand continued to increase at a very strong pace, but because of an offsetting steep decline in net exports, real GDP rose only modestly. Japan was the exception among the advanced foreign economies to the pattern of slower growth; real GDP there strengthened in the fourth quarter with higher domestic spending and continued strength in exports. Japanese exports to the United States, however, declined. Available first-quarter economic indicators for the advanced foreign economies were mixed, but, on balance, they pointed to slowing growth. Real activity also appeared to have slowed a bit in emerging markets, though it continued to advance at a fairly strong rate. In emerging Asia, the pace of real GDP growth picked up in the fourth quarter in China and South Korea, but it softened in most other countries. The rate of increase in economic activity slowed in Brazil, Mexico, and several other countries in Latin America in the fourth quarter, but remained generally strong.
In the United States, the headline CPI continued to rise rapidly in January but was flat in February. For those two months on average, the rate of headline inflation was down significantly from its elevated level in the fourth quarter of 2007, as retail energy prices stopped rising and core inflation moderated a bit; these two factors more than offset an acceleration of food prices. However, the increase in world petroleum prices in early March pointed to a renewed burst of energy price inflation in the near term. Available information, including producer prices for February, suggested that prices of core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) moved up a bit more slowly than the core CPI in January and somewhat faster than the core CPI in February. Household survey measures of expectations for year-ahead inflation jumped in March to their highest levels in about two years; in contrast, survey measures of longer-term inflation expectations were unchanged or up slightly. Average hourly earnings increased at a somewhat slower rate in January and February than they had in November and December. Over the twelve months that ended in February, this wage measure rose a bit more slowly than in the previous twelve months.
At its January 30 meeting, the FOMC lowered its target for the federal funds rate 50 basis points, to 3 percent. In addition, the Board of Governors approved a decrease of 50 basis points in the discount rate, to 3-1/2 percent. The Committee's statement noted that financial markets remained under considerable stress and that credit had tightened further for some businesses and households. Moreover, incoming information indicated a deepening of the housing contraction as well as some softening in labor markets. The Committee expected inflation to moderate in coming quarters but said that it would be necessary to continue to monitor inflation developments carefully. The Committee indicated that its action, combined with the policy actions taken earlier, should help to promote moderate growth over time and to mitigate the risks to economic activity. However, the Committee noted that downside risks to growth remained. The Committee stated that it would continue to assess the effects of financial and other developments on economic prospects and would act in a timely manner as needed to address these risks.
Over the intermeeting period, conditions in some short-term funding markets worsened. Spreads in interbank funding markets widened, as did spreads on lower-rated commercial paper. Obtaining credit through repurchase agreements backed by agency and private-label mortgage-backed securities (MBS) also became more difficult amid reports of larger "haircuts" being applied by lenders and news that some market participants missed margin calls on positions as a result. Concerns over the health of financial guarantors caused dislocations in the markets for municipal securities, and the ratios of municipal bond yields to those on comparable-maturity Treasuries climbed to historically high levels. In longer-term corporate markets, yields on investment-grade and speculative-grade corporate bonds rose, pushing their spreads relative to Treasuries to the highest levels since 2002 or even earlier in some cases. Nonetheless, gross bond issuance in January and February remained solid for investment-grade firms.
Commercial bank credit decelerated in January and February, damped by a reduction in merger and acquisition activity, weak business spending, fewer previously committed loan deals coming onto banks' books, and slower residential mortgage lending. Commercial real estate lending at banks, however, continued to advance briskly in January and February, while the rise in consumer loans was moderate. Over the intermeeting period, spreads on conforming and jumbo residential mortgages over comparable-maturity Treasury securities jumped, and credit default swap premiums for the government-sponsored enterprises increased to record highs. Issuance of conforming MBS continued to be strong, while credit availability for jumbo and nonprime mortgage borrowers remained tight. Broad stock price indexes fell further over the intermeeting period on negative economic news as well as concerns about the outlook for many financial institutions.
Similar stresses were again evident in the financial markets of major foreign economies. However, economic news in these economies was generally less downbeat than in the United States, leading to expectations of greater monetary easing in the United States than elsewhere. The trade-weighted foreign exchange value of the dollar against major currencies declined notably.
M2 increased strongly in January and February, boosted primarily by heightened demands for the relative safety and liquidity of money market mutual funds. The decline in opportunity costs associated with monetary policy easing also supported rapid growth of liquid deposits.
In the two weeks prior to the March meeting, the Federal Reserve announced several measures to bolster liquidity and promote orderly functioning in financial markets. On March 7, the Federal Reserve announced that it would initiate a series of term repurchase transactions that would facilitate funding of primary dealers' assets and that the volume of lending through the Term Auction Facility (TAF) would be increased. On March 11, the Federal Reserve, in coordination with other central banks, announced the expansion and extension of the reciprocal currency arrangements that were established in December as well as the creation of a Term Securities Lending Facility (TSLF) under which the Federal Reserve would lend Treasury securities to primary dealers for longer terms than in the existing program and based on a broader range of collateral. On March 14, the Federal Reserve Board approved the temporary financing arrangement announced that morning by JPMorgan Chase & Co. and The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. On March 16, the Federal Reserve announced the creation of a lending facility to improve the ability of primary dealers to provide financing to participants in securitization markets. In addition, the Federal Reserve lowered the primary credit rate, or discount rate, 25 basis points to 3.25 percent, and extended the maximum maturity of primary credit loans to ninety days from thirty days. It also approved the longer-term financing arrangement announced that evening by JPMorgan Chase and Bear Stearns in conjunction with the acquisition of Bear Stearns by JPMorgan Chase.
Over the intermeeting period, the expected path of monetary policy over the next year as measured by money market futures rates moved down sharply, largely in response to softer-than- expected economic data releases and deteriorating financial market conditions. The Committee's action at the January 30 meeting had been viewed by market participants as the most likely outcome, but near-term futures rates declined a few basis points as investors had placed some probability on a smaller policy move. Neither the subsequent release of the minutes of the meeting nor the March 7 Federal Reserve announcements elicited significant market reaction. The March 11 TSLF announcement was followed by a step-up in money market futures rates as liquidity concerns eased somewhat and market participants evidently concluded that less policy easing would be needed than previously anticipated. However, liquidity concerns reemerged subsequently, prompting a further drop in money market futures rates. Consistent with the shift in the economic outlook, the revision in policy expectations, and the reduction in the target federal funds rate, yields on short- and medium-term nominal Treasury coupon securities declined substantially after the January 30 FOMC meeting. However, yields on long-term Treasuries fell much less than those on shorter-term instruments, and the yield curve steepened significantly. Inflation compensation--the difference between yields on nominal Treasury securities and those on inflation-indexed issues--was little changed on balance for shorter-term issues, but longer-term inflation compensation rose.
In the forecast prepared for this meeting, the staff substantially revised down its projection for the pace of real GDP throughout 2008. Although the available data on spending and production early in the first quarter were not materially weaker than the staff's expectations, many other indicators of real activity were more negative. Payroll employment declined substantially; oil prices surged again, crimping real household incomes; and measures of consumer and business sentiment deteriorated sharply. Moreover, house prices fell by more than anticipated, and conditions in a broad range of debt markets became more restrictive. The staff projection showed a contraction of real GDP in the first half of 2008 followed by a slow rise in the second half. The recently enacted fiscal stimulus package was expected to boost real GDP in the second half of 2008, but that effect was projected to unwind in 2009. The forecast showed real GDP rising at a rate somewhat above the growth rate of its potential in 2009, in response to the impetus from cumulative monetary policy easing, continued strength in net exports, a lessening drag from high oil prices, and a relaxation of financial market strains. Even with this pickup in growth in 2009, resource utilization was anticipated to follow a lower trajectory than in the previous forecast.
The forecast for core PCE price inflation over the first half of 2008 was raised in response to elevated readings in recent months. In addition, the forecast for headline PCE price inflation incorporated a much higher rate of increase for energy prices for the first half of the year; as a result, headline PCE price inflation was expected to substantially exceed core PCE price inflation in 2008. By 2009, the forecasts for both the headline and core PCE price indexes showed inflation receding from its 2008 level, in line with the previous forecasts.
In their discussion of the economic situation and outlook, FOMC participants noted that prospects for both economic activity and near-term inflation had deteriorated in view of increasingly fragile financial markets and tighter credit conditions, rising prices for oil and other commodities, and the deepening contraction in the housing sector. Home prices had declined more steeply than anticipated, and the weakening housing market, combined with a softening in labor markets, appeared to be weighing on consumer sentiment. Businesses also were seen as becoming more pessimistic and cautious, despite a strong foreign demand for U.S. goods. Strains in financial markets had increased, portending a possible further tightening in the availability of credit to households and businesses. Against this backdrop, many participants thought some contraction in economic activity in the first half of 2008 now appeared likely. The economy was expected to begin to recover in the second half of the year, supported by recent monetary policy easing and fiscal stimulus. Accommodative monetary policy and a recovery in financial markets along with an abatement of the downdraft in housing activity were expected to help foster a further pickup in economic growth in 2009. However, considerable uncertainty surrounded this forecast, and some participants expressed concern that falling house prices and stresses in financial markets could lead to a more severe and protracted downturn in activity than currently anticipated. Participants noted that recent readings on inflation had generally been elevated, that energy prices had risen sharply, and that some indicators of inflation expectations had risen. Most participants anticipated that a flattening of oil and other commodity prices and easing pressures on resources would contribute to some moderation in inflation pressures. Nonetheless, uncertainties about the outlook for inflation had risen.
Stresses in financial markets had intensified noticeably since the January meeting. Several meeting participants noted that price discovery for mortgage-related financial assets had become increasingly difficult in an environment of declining house prices and considerable uncertainty as to the ultimate extent of such declines. With the magnitude and distribution of losses on mortgage assets quite unclear and many financial institutions experiencing significant balance sheet pressures, many lenders pulled back from risk taking--notably by increasing collateral margins on secured lending--and liquidity diminished in a number of financial markets. In these circumstances, many market participants were experiencing greater difficulties obtaining funding, and meeting participants regarded financial markets as unusually fragile. The new liquidity facilities recently introduced by the Federal Reserve would probably be helpful in bolstering market liquidity and promoting orderly market functioning, but even so, the ongoing strains were likely to raise the price and reduce the availability of credit to businesses and households. Evidence that an adverse feedback loop was under way, in which a restriction in credit availability prompts a deterioration in the economic outlook that, in turn, spurs additional tightening in credit conditions, was discussed. Several participants noted that the problems of declining asset values, credit losses, and strained financial market conditions could be quite persistent, restraining credit availability and thus economic activity for a time and having the potential subsequently to delay and damp economic recovery.
Participants noted that the contraction in the housing sector had deepened and that considerable uncertainty surrounded the outlook for housing. Although some stabilization in housing markets was likely needed to help underpin an economic recovery in coming quarters, there was little indication that that process had yet begun. Elevated rates of foreclosures and large inventories of unsold property were likely to depress home prices for some time. Lower home prices would eventually buoy home buying, but in the meantime the prospect of continued price declines could lead potential homebuyers to defer purchases for a time, further damping housing activity and adding to downward pressure on home values. Participants noted that the trajectory of house prices was a major source of uncertainty in their economic outlook.
Recent data and anecdotal reports from business contacts suggested that consumer spending was decelerating noticeably, though it apparently had not yet actually declined substantially. Participants noted that private payroll employment had fallen in February for the third consecutive month, and suggested that increasing concerns among workers about prospects for employment and income likely were holding down consumer outlays. Rising energy prices were also damping growth in real incomes. One participant reported that lenders were restricting draws on home equity lines, and the tightening of credit availability more generally was probably starting to constrain consumer spending. Also, the continued fall in home prices and declines in equity prices were weighing on household wealth, with a depressing effect on spending.
The outlook for business spending had also dimmed since the time of the January meeting. Anecdotal reports from many regions of the country pointed to a retrenchment in capital spending in response to increased pessimism about economic prospects and heightened caution on the part of business managers. The tightening supply of credit was seen as exacerbating this softness in business outlays and contributing particularly to a pullback from nonresidential construction projects. However, investment spending on agricultural equipment was reported to be quite strong, spurred by soaring crop prices. Reports on inventories were mixed but, overall, inventories appeared to be roughly in balance with desired levels.
In discussing the external sector of the economy, some participants indicated that net exports remained a notable source of support for the economy. Growth in exports was being supported by strength in foreign economies as well as declines in the foreign exchange value of the dollar. However, some of the recent increase in net exports resulted from weaker imports, which reflected softer domestic spending. Some participants saw somewhat slower global economic growth as a possible consequence of the problems in financial markets and weakness in the United States and noted that such a development could potentially limit the support that exports would provide to the U.S. economy going forward.
The recent information on inflation was seen as disappointing. With the exception of the February report on consumer prices, readings on inflation had generally been elevated. Agricultural prices were rising at a substantial clip, partly in response to strong global demand, lean supplies, and a lower foreign exchange value of the dollar. Other commodity prices also were climbing rapidly, and crude oil prices were near record levels. Several participants stated that business contacts had emphasized that their input costs were rising and that they were seeking to pass on higher costs to their customers. Some participants, however, expressed the view that emerging economic slack would limit the extent to which firms could pass on their higher costs and could serve to damp inflation more generally. Moreover, available data and anecdotal reports suggested that unit labor costs were rising only modestly, and thus were seen as unlikely to exert significant upward pressure on prices. Weaker growth, both in the United States and abroad, should also contribute to a flattening of oil and other commodity prices over time, which would also reduce price pressures and the threat of rising inflation expectations. On balance, most participants still expected inflation to moderate later this year and in 2009. However, the recent depreciation of the dollar could boost import prices and thus contribute to higher inflation. Moreover, with both core and headline inflation having been somewhat elevated, participants expressed some concern that inflation expectations might become less firmly anchored. Indeed, some indicators suggested that inflation expectations had edged higher of late. In view of these considerations, significant uncertainty attended the near-term outlook for price pressures. On balance, however, participants emphasized that appropriate monetary policy, combined with effective communication of the Committee's commitment to price stability, would foster price stability over time.
In the Committee's discussion of monetary policy for the intermeeting period, most members judged that a substantial easing in the stance of monetary policy was warranted at this meeting. The outlook for economic activity had weakened considerably since the January meeting, and members viewed the downside risks to economic growth as having increased. Indeed, some believed that a prolonged and severe economic downturn could not be ruled out given the further restriction of credit availability and ongoing weakness in the housing market. Members recognized that monetary policy alone could not address fully the underlying problems in the housing market and in financial markets, but they noted that, through a range of channels, lower short-term real interest rates should help buoy economic activity and ameliorate strains in these markets. Even with a substantial easing at this meeting, most members saw overall inflation as likely to moderate in coming quarters, reflecting a projected leveling-out of energy and commodity prices and an easing of pressures on resource utilization. However, inflation pressures had apparently risen even as the outlook for growth had weakened. With the uncertainties in the outlook for both economic activity and inflation elevated, members noted that appropriately calibrating the stance of policy was difficult, partly because some time would be required to assess the effects of the substantial easing of policy to date. All in all, members judged that a 75 basis point easing of policy at this meeting was appropriate to address the combination of risks of slowing economic growth, inflationary pressures, and financial market disruptions.
The Committee agreed that the statement to be released after the meeting should indicate that economic activity had weakened further, reflecting slower growth in consumer spending and softening in the labor market, that financial markets remained under considerable stress, and that the tightening of credit conditions and the deepening of the housing market contraction were likely to weigh on economic growth over the next few quarters. Given recent developments, the Committee concurred that the statement should note that inflation had been elevated and that some indicators of inflation expectations had risen, but agreed that the announcement should also reiterate that inflation was expected to moderate in coming quarters. As in recent statements, the Committee emphasized that it would continue to monitor inflation developments carefully. The Federal Reserve had implemented a number of measures to foster market liquidity in recent weeks, and members thought that the statement should note that policy actions taken today and earlier, including those liquidity measures, would promote moderate growth over time. In light of the uncertainties regarding the housing sector and financial market developments, however, the Committee repeated its recent indications that downside risks to growth remained. The Committee agreed on the need to act in a timely manner to promote its dual objectives of sustainable economic growth and price stability.
At the conclusion of the discussion, the Committee voted to authorize and direct the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, until it was instructed otherwise, to execute transactions in the System Account in accordance with the following domestic policy directive:
"The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee in the immediate future seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with reducing the federal funds rate to an average of around 2-1/4 percent."
The vote encompassed approval of the statement below to be released at 2:15 p.m.:
"The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to lower its target for the federal funds rate 75 basis points to 2-1/4 percent.
Recent information indicates that the outlook for economic activity has weakened further. Growth in consumer spending has slowed and labor markets have softened. Financial markets remain under considerable stress, and the tightening of credit conditions and the deepening of the housing contraction are likely to weigh on economic growth over the next few quarters.
Inflation has been elevated, and some indicators of inflation expectations have risen. The Committee expects inflation to moderate in coming quarters, reflecting a projected leveling-out of energy and other commodity prices and an easing of pressures on resource utilization. Still, uncertainty about the inflation outlook has increased. It will be necessary to continue to monitor inflation developments carefully.
Today's policy action, combined with those taken earlier, including measures to foster market liquidity, should help to promote moderate growth over time and to mitigate the risks to economic activity. However, downside risks to growth remain. The Committee will act in a timely manner as needed to promote sustainable economic growth and price stability."
Votes for this action: Messrs. Bernanke, Geithner, Kohn, Kroszner, and Mishkin, Ms. Pianalto, Messrs. Stern and Warsh.
Votes against this action: Messrs. Fisher and Plosser.
Messrs. Fisher and Plosser dissented because, in light of heightened inflation risks, they favored easing policy less aggressively. Incoming data suggested a weaker near-term outlook for economic growth, but the Committee's earlier policy moves had already reduced the target federal funds rate by 225 basis points to address risks to growth, and the full effect of those rate cuts had yet to be felt. While financial markets remained under stress, the Federal Reserve had already taken separate, significant actions to address liquidity issues in markets. In fact, Mr. Fisher felt that focusing on measures targeted at relieving liquidity strains would improve economic prospects more quickly and lastingly than would further reductions in the federal funds rate at this point; he believed that alleviating these strains would increase the efficacy of the earlier rate cuts. Both Messrs. Fisher and Plosser were concerned that inflation expectations could potentially become unhinged should the Committee continue to lower the funds rate in the current environment. They pointed to measures of inflation and indicators of inflation expectations that had risen, and Mr. Fisher stressed the international influences on U.S. inflation rates. Mr. Plosser noted that the Committee could not afford to wait until there was clear evidence that inflation expectations were no longer anchored, as by then it would be too late to prevent a further increase in inflation pressures.
It was agreed that the next meeting of the Committee would be held on Tuesday-Wednesday, April 29-30, 2008.
The meeting adjourned at 1:15 p.m.
Notation Vote By notation vote completed on February 19, 2008, the Committee unanimously approved the minutes of the FOMC meeting held on January 29-30, 2008.
Conference Call On March 10, 2008, the Committee met to review financial market developments and to consider proposals aimed at supporting the liquidity and orderly functioning of those markets. In light of the sharp further deterioration of some key money and credit markets, and against the backdrop of a weaker economic outlook, meeting participants discussed the potential usefulness and risks of instituting a Term Securities Lending Facility, under which primary dealers would be able to borrow Treasury securities for a term of approximately one month against any collateral eligible for open market operations and the highest-quality private mortgage securities. Most participants concluded that offering this facility was an appropriate step that could help alleviate pressures in the financing markets for Treasury and some mortgage-backed securities. By improving conditions in funding markets, the measure was expected to help restore the functioning of financial markets more generally and thereby promote the effective conduct of monetary policy as well as macroeconomic stability. During the discussion, participants expressed concerns that establishment of the facility could be viewed as setting a precedent and thus raise expectations of other actions in the future, and they also noted some uncertainty about how effective the facility would be in practice. On balance, the Committee decided that the facility could prove useful in preventing an escalation of an unhealthy dynamic that was developing in money and credit markets, in which liquidity and collateral concerns were spreading. In addition, the Committee agreed to expand and extend the existing reciprocal currency agreements with the European Central Bank and the Swiss National Bank.
The Committee voted to approve the following resolutions:
Term Securities Lending Facility. In addition to the current authorization granted to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to engage in overnight securities lending transactions, and in order to ensure the effective conduct of open market operations, the Federal Open Market Committee authorizes the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to lend up to $200 billion of U.S. Government securities held in the System Open Market Account to primary dealers for a term that does not exceed 35 days at rates that shall be determined by competitive bidding.
These lending transactions may be against pledges of U.S. Government securities, other assets that the Reserve Bank is specifically authorized to buy and sell under section 14 of the Federal Reserve Act (including federal agency residential- mortgage-backed securities (MBS)), and non-agency AAA-rated residential MBS.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York shall set a minimum lending fee consistent with the objectives of the program and apply reasonable limitations on the total amount of a specific issue that may be auctioned and on the amount of securities that each dealer may borrow.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York may reject bids which could facilitate a dealer's ability to control a single issue as determined solely by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
This authority shall expire at such time as determined by the Federal Open Market Committee or the Board of Governors.
Secretary's note: By notation vote completed on March 20, 2008, the Committee unanimously approved a resolution that added non- agency AAA-rated commercial-mortgage-backed securities to the list of collateral acceptable in connection with the Term Securities Lending Facility.
Swap Authorizations. The Federal Open Market Committee directs the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to increase the amount available from the System Open Market Account under the existing reciprocal currency arrangement ("swap" arrangement) with the European Central Bank to an amount not to exceed $30 billion. Within that aggregate limit, draws of up to $15 billion are hereby authorized. The current swap arrangement shall be extended until September 30, 2008, unless further extended by the Federal Open Market Committee.
The Federal Open Market Committee directs the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to increase the amount available from the System Open Market Account under the existing reciprocal currency arrangement ("swap" arrangement) with the Swiss National Bank to an amount not to exceed $6 billion. Draws are authorized up to the full amount of the swap. The current swap arrangement shall be extended until September 30, 2008, unless further extended by the Federal Open Market Committee.
Votes for these actions: Messrs. Bernanke, Geithner, Fisher, Kohn, and Kroszner, Ms. Pianalto, Messrs. Plosser and Warsh, and Ms. Yellen.
Votes against these actions: None.
Absent and not voting: Mr. Mishkin.
Ms. Yellen voted as alternate member.
_____________________________
Brian F. Madigan Secretary
SOURCE: Federal Reserve Board
Last Updated: April 8, 2008 14:02 EDT
April 8 (Bloomberg) -- Following are the minutes of the Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee meeting that concluded on March 18.
A meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee was held in the offices of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, March 18, 2008 at 8:30 a.m. Present: Mr. Bernanke, Chairman Mr. Geithner, Vice Chairman Mr. Fisher Mr. Kohn Mr. Kroszner Mr. Mishkin Ms. Pianalto Mr. Plosser Mr. Stern Mr. Warsh
Messrs. Evans, Lacker, and Lockhart, and Ms. Yellen, Alternate Members of the Federal Open Market Committee
Messrs. Hoenig and Rosengren, Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks of Kansas City and Boston, respectively
Mr. Sapenaro, First Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Mr. Madigan, Secretary and Economist Ms. Danker, Deputy Secretary Mr. Skidmore, Assistant Secretary Ms. Smith, Assistant Secretary Mr. Alvarez, General Counsel Mr. Ashton, Assistant General Counsel Mr. Sheets, Economist Mr. Stockton, Economist
Messrs. Connors, English, and Kamin, Ms. Mester, Messrs. Rolnick, Rosenblum, Slifman, Sniderman, and Wilcox, Associate Economists
Mr. Dudley, Manager, System Open Market Account
Mr. Struckmeyer, Deputy Staff Director, Office of Staff Director for Management, Board of Governors
Mr. Parkinson, Deputy Director, Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors
Ms. Bailey, Deputy Director, Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation, Board of Governors
Mr. Clouse, Deputy Director, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Ms. Liang and Messrs. Reifschneider and Wascher, Associate Directors, Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors
Mr. Gagnon, Visiting Associate Director, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Mr. Blanchard, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members, Board of Governors
Mr. Carpenter, Assistant Director, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Mr. Small, Project Manager, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Mr. Luecke, Section Chief, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Ms. Low, Open Market Secretariat Specialist, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Mr. Judd, Executive Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Messrs. Altig, Rasche, Sellon, and Sullivan, Senior Vice Presidents, Federal Reserve Banks of Atlanta, St. Louis, Kansas City, and Chicago, respectively
Mr. Olivei, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
Mr. Pesenti, Assistant Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Mr. Hetzel, Senior Economist, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
The Manager of the System Open Market Account reported on recent developments in foreign exchange markets. There were no open market operations in foreign currencies for the System's account in the period since the previous meeting. The Manager also reported on developments in domestic financial markets and on System open market operations in government securities and federal agency obligations during the period since the previous meeting. By unanimous vote, the Committee ratified these transactions.
The information reviewed at the March meeting indicated that economic activity had continued to decelerate in recent months. The contraction in homebuilding intensified, consumer spending appeared to be weakening, and survey measures of both consumer and business sentiment were at depressed levels. Industrial production fell in February, and private payroll employment posted a third consecutive monthly decline. After having increased in recent months through January, both headline and core inflation as measured by the consumer price index (CPI) dropped noticeably in February. In early March, however, prices of oil and other commodities rose sharply.
Labor demand softened markedly in recent months. The decline in private payroll employment that began last December steepened through February. Although employment by firms in the nonbusiness services sector and in state and local governments continued to rise, declines elsewhere were widespread. Losses were greatest in the manufacturing, construction, and retail trade sectors. Aggregate hours of private production or nonsupervisory workers fell slightly in the first two months of the year. The unemployment rate edged down to 4.8 percent in February, but was still up from the 4.5 percent rate of a year earlier. The labor force participation rate declined in February.
Industrial production declined in February after edging up slightly in the previous two months. The output of utilities dropped back after a weather-related surge in January, while mining output fell somewhat in the first two months of the year on average. Manufacturing production edged down after having flattened out in January. The motor vehicle and construction- related industries continued to hold down overall manufacturing output even as high-tech production posted moderate increases. The factory utilization rate edged down in February to a level noticeably below its recent high in the third quarter of 2007.
Real consumer spending appeared to have stalled in recent months. Real outlays for nondurable and durable consumer goods, including automobiles, were estimated to have declined, on average, in January and February. Real disposable personal income was unchanged in the fourth quarter, held down by higher food and energy prices, and moved up only slightly in January. Further declines in house prices led to a noticeable decrease in the ratio of household wealth to disposable income in the fourth quarter. The downturn in equity prices since December further reduced household wealth in the first quarter. Readings on consumer sentiment dropped sharply in February from already low levels, and the Reuters/University of Michigan survey remained at a depressed level in early March.
The contraction in residential construction continued into early 2008. Single-family housing starts fell in both January and February. After having dropped especially sharply in December, multifamily housing starts rebounded somewhat in the first two months of the year. New home sales declined again in January, thereby pushing inventories of unsold homes to even higher levels relative to sales. Sales of existing homes held roughly steady in January, and the index of pending sales agreements in that month was consistent with flat sales in February and March. Overall, demand for housing continued to be restrained by tight financing conditions for jumbo and nonprime mortgages.
Real spending on equipment and software rose at a sluggish rate in the fourth quarter. In January, orders and shipments of nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft were above their fourth-quarter levels. However, the overall outlook for capital spending in the first quarter was weak in light of the deterioration in surveys of business conditions and attitudes and the worsening situation in markets for business finance. On the heels of robust gains during most of last year, nominal spending on nonresidential structures decelerated in December and posted an outright decline in January. Although spending in this sector is often volatile, the recent deceleration was consistent with mounting indications of slowing demand for nonresidential buildings and tightening credit conditions.
Real investment in nonfarm inventories excluding motor vehicles remained at a steady pace in the fourth quarter of 2007, but motor vehicle inventories fell sharply. After declining in November, the ratio of manufacturing and trade book-value inventories (excluding motor vehicles) to sales ticked up in December and held steady in January, but this ratio remained well below its average value in 2007.
The U.S. international trade deficit narrowed substantially in December and was about unchanged in January. Exports rose sharply in both months, while imports dipped in December before recovering in January. Increases in exports were broadly based except for automotive exports, which dropped sharply in December and remained low in January. Imports of services were up moderately. Oil imports soared, reflecting increases in both prices and volumes. Most other categories of imports dropped in December and January on net, with especially large declines in imports of automotive and consumer goods.
In the major advanced foreign economies, the rate of growth of real gross domestic product (GDP) generally declined in the fourth quarter. The source of the slowdown varied substantially across economies. In the euro area and in the United Kingdom, output was restrained by a softening in domestic demand. In contrast, Canadian domestic demand continued to increase at a very strong pace, but because of an offsetting steep decline in net exports, real GDP rose only modestly. Japan was the exception among the advanced foreign economies to the pattern of slower growth; real GDP there strengthened in the fourth quarter with higher domestic spending and continued strength in exports. Japanese exports to the United States, however, declined. Available first-quarter economic indicators for the advanced foreign economies were mixed, but, on balance, they pointed to slowing growth. Real activity also appeared to have slowed a bit in emerging markets, though it continued to advance at a fairly strong rate. In emerging Asia, the pace of real GDP growth picked up in the fourth quarter in China and South Korea, but it softened in most other countries. The rate of increase in economic activity slowed in Brazil, Mexico, and several other countries in Latin America in the fourth quarter, but remained generally strong.
In the United States, the headline CPI continued to rise rapidly in January but was flat in February. For those two months on average, the rate of headline inflation was down significantly from its elevated level in the fourth quarter of 2007, as retail energy prices stopped rising and core inflation moderated a bit; these two factors more than offset an acceleration of food prices. However, the increase in world petroleum prices in early March pointed to a renewed burst of energy price inflation in the near term. Available information, including producer prices for February, suggested that prices of core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) moved up a bit more slowly than the core CPI in January and somewhat faster than the core CPI in February. Household survey measures of expectations for year-ahead inflation jumped in March to their highest levels in about two years; in contrast, survey measures of longer-term inflation expectations were unchanged or up slightly. Average hourly earnings increased at a somewhat slower rate in January and February than they had in November and December. Over the twelve months that ended in February, this wage measure rose a bit more slowly than in the previous twelve months.
At its January 30 meeting, the FOMC lowered its target for the federal funds rate 50 basis points, to 3 percent. In addition, the Board of Governors approved a decrease of 50 basis points in the discount rate, to 3-1/2 percent. The Committee's statement noted that financial markets remained under considerable stress and that credit had tightened further for some businesses and households. Moreover, incoming information indicated a deepening of the housing contraction as well as some softening in labor markets. The Committee expected inflation to moderate in coming quarters but said that it would be necessary to continue to monitor inflation developments carefully. The Committee indicated that its action, combined with the policy actions taken earlier, should help to promote moderate growth over time and to mitigate the risks to economic activity. However, the Committee noted that downside risks to growth remained. The Committee stated that it would continue to assess the effects of financial and other developments on economic prospects and would act in a timely manner as needed to address these risks.
Over the intermeeting period, conditions in some short-term funding markets worsened. Spreads in interbank funding markets widened, as did spreads on lower-rated commercial paper. Obtaining credit through repurchase agreements backed by agency and private-label mortgage-backed securities (MBS) also became more difficult amid reports of larger "haircuts" being applied by lenders and news that some market participants missed margin calls on positions as a result. Concerns over the health of financial guarantors caused dislocations in the markets for municipal securities, and the ratios of municipal bond yields to those on comparable-maturity Treasuries climbed to historically high levels. In longer-term corporate markets, yields on investment-grade and speculative-grade corporate bonds rose, pushing their spreads relative to Treasuries to the highest levels since 2002 or even earlier in some cases. Nonetheless, gross bond issuance in January and February remained solid for investment-grade firms.
Commercial bank credit decelerated in January and February, damped by a reduction in merger and acquisition activity, weak business spending, fewer previously committed loan deals coming onto banks' books, and slower residential mortgage lending. Commercial real estate lending at banks, however, continued to advance briskly in January and February, while the rise in consumer loans was moderate. Over the intermeeting period, spreads on conforming and jumbo residential mortgages over comparable-maturity Treasury securities jumped, and credit default swap premiums for the government-sponsored enterprises increased to record highs. Issuance of conforming MBS continued to be strong, while credit availability for jumbo and nonprime mortgage borrowers remained tight. Broad stock price indexes fell further over the intermeeting period on negative economic news as well as concerns about the outlook for many financial institutions.
Similar stresses were again evident in the financial markets of major foreign economies. However, economic news in these economies was generally less downbeat than in the United States, leading to expectations of greater monetary easing in the United States than elsewhere. The trade-weighted foreign exchange value of the dollar against major currencies declined notably.
M2 increased strongly in January and February, boosted primarily by heightened demands for the relative safety and liquidity of money market mutual funds. The decline in opportunity costs associated with monetary policy easing also supported rapid growth of liquid deposits.
In the two weeks prior to the March meeting, the Federal Reserve announced several measures to bolster liquidity and promote orderly functioning in financial markets. On March 7, the Federal Reserve announced that it would initiate a series of term repurchase transactions that would facilitate funding of primary dealers' assets and that the volume of lending through the Term Auction Facility (TAF) would be increased. On March 11, the Federal Reserve, in coordination with other central banks, announced the expansion and extension of the reciprocal currency arrangements that were established in December as well as the creation of a Term Securities Lending Facility (TSLF) under which the Federal Reserve would lend Treasury securities to primary dealers for longer terms than in the existing program and based on a broader range of collateral. On March 14, the Federal Reserve Board approved the temporary financing arrangement announced that morning by JPMorgan Chase & Co. and The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. On March 16, the Federal Reserve announced the creation of a lending facility to improve the ability of primary dealers to provide financing to participants in securitization markets. In addition, the Federal Reserve lowered the primary credit rate, or discount rate, 25 basis points to 3.25 percent, and extended the maximum maturity of primary credit loans to ninety days from thirty days. It also approved the longer-term financing arrangement announced that evening by JPMorgan Chase and Bear Stearns in conjunction with the acquisition of Bear Stearns by JPMorgan Chase.
Over the intermeeting period, the expected path of monetary policy over the next year as measured by money market futures rates moved down sharply, largely in response to softer-than- expected economic data releases and deteriorating financial market conditions. The Committee's action at the January 30 meeting had been viewed by market participants as the most likely outcome, but near-term futures rates declined a few basis points as investors had placed some probability on a smaller policy move. Neither the subsequent release of the minutes of the meeting nor the March 7 Federal Reserve announcements elicited significant market reaction. The March 11 TSLF announcement was followed by a step-up in money market futures rates as liquidity concerns eased somewhat and market participants evidently concluded that less policy easing would be needed than previously anticipated. However, liquidity concerns reemerged subsequently, prompting a further drop in money market futures rates. Consistent with the shift in the economic outlook, the revision in policy expectations, and the reduction in the target federal funds rate, yields on short- and medium-term nominal Treasury coupon securities declined substantially after the January 30 FOMC meeting. However, yields on long-term Treasuries fell much less than those on shorter-term instruments, and the yield curve steepened significantly. Inflation compensation--the difference between yields on nominal Treasury securities and those on inflation-indexed issues--was little changed on balance for shorter-term issues, but longer-term inflation compensation rose.
In the forecast prepared for this meeting, the staff substantially revised down its projection for the pace of real GDP throughout 2008. Although the available data on spending and production early in the first quarter were not materially weaker than the staff's expectations, many other indicators of real activity were more negative. Payroll employment declined substantially; oil prices surged again, crimping real household incomes; and measures of consumer and business sentiment deteriorated sharply. Moreover, house prices fell by more than anticipated, and conditions in a broad range of debt markets became more restrictive. The staff projection showed a contraction of real GDP in the first half of 2008 followed by a slow rise in the second half. The recently enacted fiscal stimulus package was expected to boost real GDP in the second half of 2008, but that effect was projected to unwind in 2009. The forecast showed real GDP rising at a rate somewhat above the growth rate of its potential in 2009, in response to the impetus from cumulative monetary policy easing, continued strength in net exports, a lessening drag from high oil prices, and a relaxation of financial market strains. Even with this pickup in growth in 2009, resource utilization was anticipated to follow a lower trajectory than in the previous forecast.
The forecast for core PCE price inflation over the first half of 2008 was raised in response to elevated readings in recent months. In addition, the forecast for headline PCE price inflation incorporated a much higher rate of increase for energy prices for the first half of the year; as a result, headline PCE price inflation was expected to substantially exceed core PCE price inflation in 2008. By 2009, the forecasts for both the headline and core PCE price indexes showed inflation receding from its 2008 level, in line with the previous forecasts.
In their discussion of the economic situation and outlook, FOMC participants noted that prospects for both economic activity and near-term inflation had deteriorated in view of increasingly fragile financial markets and tighter credit conditions, rising prices for oil and other commodities, and the deepening contraction in the housing sector. Home prices had declined more steeply than anticipated, and the weakening housing market, combined with a softening in labor markets, appeared to be weighing on consumer sentiment. Businesses also were seen as becoming more pessimistic and cautious, despite a strong foreign demand for U.S. goods. Strains in financial markets had increased, portending a possible further tightening in the availability of credit to households and businesses. Against this backdrop, many participants thought some contraction in economic activity in the first half of 2008 now appeared likely. The economy was expected to begin to recover in the second half of the year, supported by recent monetary policy easing and fiscal stimulus. Accommodative monetary policy and a recovery in financial markets along with an abatement of the downdraft in housing activity were expected to help foster a further pickup in economic growth in 2009. However, considerable uncertainty surrounded this forecast, and some participants expressed concern that falling house prices and stresses in financial markets could lead to a more severe and protracted downturn in activity than currently anticipated. Participants noted that recent readings on inflation had generally been elevated, that energy prices had risen sharply, and that some indicators of inflation expectations had risen. Most participants anticipated that a flattening of oil and other commodity prices and easing pressures on resources would contribute to some moderation in inflation pressures. Nonetheless, uncertainties about the outlook for inflation had risen.
Stresses in financial markets had intensified noticeably since the January meeting. Several meeting participants noted that price discovery for mortgage-related financial assets had become increasingly difficult in an environment of declining house prices and considerable uncertainty as to the ultimate extent of such declines. With the magnitude and distribution of losses on mortgage assets quite unclear and many financial institutions experiencing significant balance sheet pressures, many lenders pulled back from risk taking--notably by increasing collateral margins on secured lending--and liquidity diminished in a number of financial markets. In these circumstances, many market participants were experiencing greater difficulties obtaining funding, and meeting participants regarded financial markets as unusually fragile. The new liquidity facilities recently introduced by the Federal Reserve would probably be helpful in bolstering market liquidity and promoting orderly market functioning, but even so, the ongoing strains were likely to raise the price and reduce the availability of credit to businesses and households. Evidence that an adverse feedback loop was under way, in which a restriction in credit availability prompts a deterioration in the economic outlook that, in turn, spurs additional tightening in credit conditions, was discussed. Several participants noted that the problems of declining asset values, credit losses, and strained financial market conditions could be quite persistent, restraining credit availability and thus economic activity for a time and having the potential subsequently to delay and damp economic recovery.
Participants noted that the contraction in the housing sector had deepened and that considerable uncertainty surrounded the outlook for housing. Although some stabilization in housing markets was likely needed to help underpin an economic recovery in coming quarters, there was little indication that that process had yet begun. Elevated rates of foreclosures and large inventories of unsold property were likely to depress home prices for some time. Lower home prices would eventually buoy home buying, but in the meantime the prospect of continued price declines could lead potential homebuyers to defer purchases for a time, further damping housing activity and adding to downward pressure on home values. Participants noted that the trajectory of house prices was a major source of uncertainty in their economic outlook.
Recent data and anecdotal reports from business contacts suggested that consumer spending was decelerating noticeably, though it apparently had not yet actually declined substantially. Participants noted that private payroll employment had fallen in February for the third consecutive month, and suggested that increasing concerns among workers about prospects for employment and income likely were holding down consumer outlays. Rising energy prices were also damping growth in real incomes. One participant reported that lenders were restricting draws on home equity lines, and the tightening of credit availability more generally was probably starting to constrain consumer spending. Also, the continued fall in home prices and declines in equity prices were weighing on household wealth, with a depressing effect on spending.
The outlook for business spending had also dimmed since the time of the January meeting. Anecdotal reports from many regions of the country pointed to a retrenchment in capital spending in response to increased pessimism about economic prospects and heightened caution on the part of business managers. The tightening supply of credit was seen as exacerbating this softness in business outlays and contributing particularly to a pullback from nonresidential construction projects. However, investment spending on agricultural equipment was reported to be quite strong, spurred by soaring crop prices. Reports on inventories were mixed but, overall, inventories appeared to be roughly in balance with desired levels.
In discussing the external sector of the economy, some participants indicated that net exports remained a notable source of support for the economy. Growth in exports was being supported by strength in foreign economies as well as declines in the foreign exchange value of the dollar. However, some of the recent increase in net exports resulted from weaker imports, which reflected softer domestic spending. Some participants saw somewhat slower global economic growth as a possible consequence of the problems in financial markets and weakness in the United States and noted that such a development could potentially limit the support that exports would provide to the U.S. economy going forward.
The recent information on inflation was seen as disappointing. With the exception of the February report on consumer prices, readings on inflation had generally been elevated. Agricultural prices were rising at a substantial clip, partly in response to strong global demand, lean supplies, and a lower foreign exchange value of the dollar. Other commodity prices also were climbing rapidly, and crude oil prices were near record levels. Several participants stated that business contacts had emphasized that their input costs were rising and that they were seeking to pass on higher costs to their customers. Some participants, however, expressed the view that emerging economic slack would limit the extent to which firms could pass on their higher costs and could serve to damp inflation more generally. Moreover, available data and anecdotal reports suggested that unit labor costs were rising only modestly, and thus were seen as unlikely to exert significant upward pressure on prices. Weaker growth, both in the United States and abroad, should also contribute to a flattening of oil and other commodity prices over time, which would also reduce price pressures and the threat of rising inflation expectations. On balance, most participants still expected inflation to moderate later this year and in 2009. However, the recent depreciation of the dollar could boost import prices and thus contribute to higher inflation. Moreover, with both core and headline inflation having been somewhat elevated, participants expressed some concern that inflation expectations might become less firmly anchored. Indeed, some indicators suggested that inflation expectations had edged higher of late. In view of these considerations, significant uncertainty attended the near-term outlook for price pressures. On balance, however, participants emphasized that appropriate monetary policy, combined with effective communication of the Committee's commitment to price stability, would foster price stability over time.
In the Committee's discussion of monetary policy for the intermeeting period, most members judged that a substantial easing in the stance of monetary policy was warranted at this meeting. The outlook for economic activity had weakened considerably since the January meeting, and members viewed the downside risks to economic growth as having increased. Indeed, some believed that a prolonged and severe economic downturn could not be ruled out given the further restriction of credit availability and ongoing weakness in the housing market. Members recognized that monetary policy alone could not address fully the underlying problems in the housing market and in financial markets, but they noted that, through a range of channels, lower short-term real interest rates should help buoy economic activity and ameliorate strains in these markets. Even with a substantial easing at this meeting, most members saw overall inflation as likely to moderate in coming quarters, reflecting a projected leveling-out of energy and commodity prices and an easing of pressures on resource utilization. However, inflation pressures had apparently risen even as the outlook for growth had weakened. With the uncertainties in the outlook for both economic activity and inflation elevated, members noted that appropriately calibrating the stance of policy was difficult, partly because some time would be required to assess the effects of the substantial easing of policy to date. All in all, members judged that a 75 basis point easing of policy at this meeting was appropriate to address the combination of risks of slowing economic growth, inflationary pressures, and financial market disruptions.
The Committee agreed that the statement to be released after the meeting should indicate that economic activity had weakened further, reflecting slower growth in consumer spending and softening in the labor market, that financial markets remained under considerable stress, and that the tightening of credit conditions and the deepening of the housing market contraction were likely to weigh on economic growth over the next few quarters. Given recent developments, the Committee concurred that the statement should note that inflation had been elevated and that some indicators of inflation expectations had risen, but agreed that the announcement should also reiterate that inflation was expected to moderate in coming quarters. As in recent statements, the Committee emphasized that it would continue to monitor inflation developments carefully. The Federal Reserve had implemented a number of measures to foster market liquidity in recent weeks, and members thought that the statement should note that policy actions taken today and earlier, including those liquidity measures, would promote moderate growth over time. In light of the uncertainties regarding the housing sector and financial market developments, however, the Committee repeated its recent indications that downside risks to growth remained. The Committee agreed on the need to act in a timely manner to promote its dual objectives of sustainable economic growth and price stability.
At the conclusion of the discussion, the Committee voted to authorize and direct the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, until it was instructed otherwise, to execute transactions in the System Account in accordance with the following domestic policy directive:
"The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee in the immediate future seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with reducing the federal funds rate to an average of around 2-1/4 percent."
The vote encompassed approval of the statement below to be released at 2:15 p.m.:
"The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to lower its target for the federal funds rate 75 basis points to 2-1/4 percent.
Recent information indicates that the outlook for economic activity has weakened further. Growth in consumer spending has slowed and labor markets have softened. Financial markets remain under considerable stress, and the tightening of credit conditions and the deepening of the housing contraction are likely to weigh on economic growth over the next few quarters.
Inflation has been elevated, and some indicators of inflation expectations have risen. The Committee expects inflation to moderate in coming quarters, reflecting a projected leveling-out of energy and other commodity prices and an easing of pressures on resource utilization. Still, uncertainty about the inflation outlook has increased. It will be necessary to continue to monitor inflation developments carefully.
Today's policy action, combined with those taken earlier, including measures to foster market liquidity, should help to promote moderate growth over time and to mitigate the risks to economic activity. However, downside risks to growth remain. The Committee will act in a timely manner as needed to promote sustainable economic growth and price stability."
Votes for this action: Messrs. Bernanke, Geithner, Kohn, Kroszner, and Mishkin, Ms. Pianalto, Messrs. Stern and Warsh.
Votes against this action: Messrs. Fisher and Plosser.
Messrs. Fisher and Plosser dissented because, in light of heightened inflation risks, they favored easing policy less aggressively. Incoming data suggested a weaker near-term outlook for economic growth, but the Committee's earlier policy moves had already reduced the target federal funds rate by 225 basis points to address risks to growth, and the full effect of those rate cuts had yet to be felt. While financial markets remained under stress, the Federal Reserve had already taken separate, significant actions to address liquidity issues in markets. In fact, Mr. Fisher felt that focusing on measures targeted at relieving liquidity strains would improve economic prospects more quickly and lastingly than would further reductions in the federal funds rate at this point; he believed that alleviating these strains would increase the efficacy of the earlier rate cuts. Both Messrs. Fisher and Plosser were concerned that inflation expectations could potentially become unhinged should the Committee continue to lower the funds rate in the current environment. They pointed to measures of inflation and indicators of inflation expectations that had risen, and Mr. Fisher stressed the international influences on U.S. inflation rates. Mr. Plosser noted that the Committee could not afford to wait until there was clear evidence that inflation expectations were no longer anchored, as by then it would be too late to prevent a further increase in inflation pressures.
It was agreed that the next meeting of the Committee would be held on Tuesday-Wednesday, April 29-30, 2008.
The meeting adjourned at 1:15 p.m.
Notation Vote By notation vote completed on February 19, 2008, the Committee unanimously approved the minutes of the FOMC meeting held on January 29-30, 2008.
Conference Call On March 10, 2008, the Committee met to review financial market developments and to consider proposals aimed at supporting the liquidity and orderly functioning of those markets. In light of the sharp further deterioration of some key money and credit markets, and against the backdrop of a weaker economic outlook, meeting participants discussed the potential usefulness and risks of instituting a Term Securities Lending Facility, under which primary dealers would be able to borrow Treasury securities for a term of approximately one month against any collateral eligible for open market operations and the highest-quality private mortgage securities. Most participants concluded that offering this facility was an appropriate step that could help alleviate pressures in the financing markets for Treasury and some mortgage-backed securities. By improving conditions in funding markets, the measure was expected to help restore the functioning of financial markets more generally and thereby promote the effective conduct of monetary policy as well as macroeconomic stability. During the discussion, participants expressed concerns that establishment of the facility could be viewed as setting a precedent and thus raise expectations of other actions in the future, and they also noted some uncertainty about how effective the facility would be in practice. On balance, the Committee decided that the facility could prove useful in preventing an escalation of an unhealthy dynamic that was developing in money and credit markets, in which liquidity and collateral concerns were spreading. In addition, the Committee agreed to expand and extend the existing reciprocal currency agreements with the European Central Bank and the Swiss National Bank.
The Committee voted to approve the following resolutions:
Term Securities Lending Facility. In addition to the current authorization granted to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to engage in overnight securities lending transactions, and in order to ensure the effective conduct of open market operations, the Federal Open Market Committee authorizes the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to lend up to $200 billion of U.S. Government securities held in the System Open Market Account to primary dealers for a term that does not exceed 35 days at rates that shall be determined by competitive bidding.
These lending transactions may be against pledges of U.S. Government securities, other assets that the Reserve Bank is specifically authorized to buy and sell under section 14 of the Federal Reserve Act (including federal agency residential- mortgage-backed securities (MBS)), and non-agency AAA-rated residential MBS.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York shall set a minimum lending fee consistent with the objectives of the program and apply reasonable limitations on the total amount of a specific issue that may be auctioned and on the amount of securities that each dealer may borrow.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York may reject bids which could facilitate a dealer's ability to control a single issue as determined solely by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
This authority shall expire at such time as determined by the Federal Open Market Committee or the Board of Governors.
Secretary's note: By notation vote completed on March 20, 2008, the Committee unanimously approved a resolution that added non- agency AAA-rated commercial-mortgage-backed securities to the list of collateral acceptable in connection with the Term Securities Lending Facility.
Swap Authorizations. The Federal Open Market Committee directs the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to increase the amount available from the System Open Market Account under the existing reciprocal currency arrangement ("swap" arrangement) with the European Central Bank to an amount not to exceed $30 billion. Within that aggregate limit, draws of up to $15 billion are hereby authorized. The current swap arrangement shall be extended until September 30, 2008, unless further extended by the Federal Open Market Committee.
The Federal Open Market Committee directs the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to increase the amount available from the System Open Market Account under the existing reciprocal currency arrangement ("swap" arrangement) with the Swiss National Bank to an amount not to exceed $6 billion. Draws are authorized up to the full amount of the swap. The current swap arrangement shall be extended until September 30, 2008, unless further extended by the Federal Open Market Committee.
Votes for these actions: Messrs. Bernanke, Geithner, Fisher, Kohn, and Kroszner, Ms. Pianalto, Messrs. Plosser and Warsh, and Ms. Yellen.
Votes against these actions: None.
Absent and not voting: Mr. Mishkin.
Ms. Yellen voted as alternate member.
_____________________________
Brian F. Madigan Secretary
SOURCE: Federal Reserve Board
Last Updated: April 8, 2008 14:02 EDT
Gleich kommt Kauflaune auf.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.999 von zenkey1 am 08.04.08 20:33:25der bursche hengt da wie ein seekranker über der rheling und will einfach nicht über bord gehen
Der Sonic hat einen Bunker in Südfrankreich... warum wurde Sonic gesperrt?
Der Sonic hat einen Bunker in Südfrankreich... warum wurde Sonic gesperrt?
noch ein letztes Posting an @ Tellerwscher:
#353 von hexalzeit
ist nur eine kleine Konsolidierung bis 6750 - 6700 Bereich. Danach könnte es weiter Up gehen Richtung 6900-7000 diese Woche. Meine Ansicht nach.
#360:"ich sehe keinen Grund pessimistisch zu sein. Dow Future sieht momentan gar nicht so schlimm aus."
Von dir hab ich nichts gescheitest gefunden.
Meine Kommentare für Tages-Trading-Chancen für heute und bezieht sich auch für heute.
Nur verstehe ich deine Kommentar nicht, warst ich hier in Forum zu suchen hab, oder sowas ähnliches.
#353 von hexalzeit
ist nur eine kleine Konsolidierung bis 6750 - 6700 Bereich. Danach könnte es weiter Up gehen Richtung 6900-7000 diese Woche. Meine Ansicht nach.
#360:"ich sehe keinen Grund pessimistisch zu sein. Dow Future sieht momentan gar nicht so schlimm aus."
Von dir hab ich nichts gescheitest gefunden.
Meine Kommentare für Tages-Trading-Chancen für heute und bezieht sich auch für heute.
Nur verstehe ich deine Kommentar nicht, warst ich hier in Forum zu suchen hab, oder sowas ähnliches.
Verdächtig ist auch, daß das Volumen beim Dow derzeit lächerlich gering ist
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.048 von Lord_Feric am 08.04.08 20:39:21Dann läßt sich det Dingens ja leicht bewegen.
.....das ist wie Würfeln hab die letzten shorts raus mit plus 13,5 bei 1363,5...... um 21:30 kriegen die wieder Biege ev.
Jetzt aber zu meinem Tagesziel, paar Rumors gestreut. Kann doch nitt so schwer sein.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.040 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 20:38:22hab nie behauptet daß hier irgendwas gescheites von mir gekommen ist. ich sagte doch, deine sreens dann bekommste meine. habe dich nur drauf hingewiesen, daß dax 12000 hier bissl verkehrt ist. wollt grad noch was schreiben... ich lasse es, schick deine screens, bekommste meine und gut.feierabend
Votes against this action: Messrs. Fisher and Plosser.
denen iss es also zu verdanken
denen iss es also zu verdanken
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.040 von hexalzeit am 08.04.08 20:38:22aber aber liebe Leute..seid doch friedlich miteinander...
wie sagte ein Kollege heute vormittag....
leben und sterben lassen......
wie sagte ein Kollege heute vormittag....
leben und sterben lassen......
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.937 von LBR am 08.04.08 20:26:10very nice madame
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.965 von ortlepp am 08.04.08 20:29:18meinst du?
hehe...Holger Struck meint: eines tages über 12750/12800 wird es wahrscheinlich der "squeeze des jahrhunderts".... aber noch ist es dafür zu früh!
... mal sehen
... mal sehen
Stündchen hammer noch
Teller und Hexal, könnt ihr nicht in ein Chatseparee gehen?
...und jetzt zum TH und ihr bekommt den Verarscherorden in Gold verliehen liebe Amis !
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.164 von LBR am 08.04.08 20:52:56haben usn überschnitten, dein timing war klasse.
ich hatte jetzt ein bestimmtes setup im 5er, da wäre es noch stück dwon, durchaus mit bruch des doppelbottoms, kam nitt, bin also flät geblieben
ich hatte jetzt ein bestimmtes setup im 5er, da wäre es noch stück dwon, durchaus mit bruch des doppelbottoms, kam nitt, bin also flät geblieben
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.164 von LBR am 08.04.08 20:52:56Na hör mal, was erwartest Du ?
War doch der Hammer Einstieg.
War doch der Hammer Einstieg.
...und einfach abgeschaltet.
Viel Spaß noch.
Viel Spaß noch.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.199 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 20:55:41jo..da hätte ich nie drauf gewettet..congrats LBR
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.199 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 20:55:41an der 12.6oo hätte ich aber geschmissen um ehrlich zu sein, also 70pkt, LBR wird das ding schon bis 12.7oo / 12.8oo laufen lassen - denk ich mal
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.164 von LBR am 08.04.08 20:52:56Heh, LBR, schieb mal ein Foto rüber für meinen Altar. Ich mach nachher noch ein wenig Götzendienst. Falls die Sache mit R2 hinhaut...
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.216 von skywoolf am 08.04.08 20:57:43Hör mir auf mit R 2: wenn das heute noch hinhaut, kotze ich aus dem Fenster.
..hab mir eben Handschellen angelegt um nicht wieder short zu gehen, irgendwie reizt mich das
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.265 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 21:02:38Glaub ich auch nicht dran, aber 12650 sind noch drin.
ist nicht verkehrt die Zahl Dax 12000 im Hintergrund zu haben, wenn einige User die Weltuntergang prophezeihen ---> Dax 5000-4000.
@ jevogru
meine Reaktion, ich reagiere empfindlich wenn einer blöde Kommentare ablässt.
@ jevogru
meine Reaktion, ich reagiere empfindlich wenn einer blöde Kommentare ablässt.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.265 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 21:02:38hi
Hör mir auf mit R 2: wenn das heute noch hinhaut, kotze ich aus dem Fenster.
...weil du schon draussen bist oder wie?
hatte die us-futures auch auf dem schirm, nasdaq @s1, s&p gekauft 1/2 schon gegeben
und während ich das schreibe rest @einstand geflogen dabei hatte ich TP @TH
aber wo r2???? herkommt weiss ich auch nicht
grüße
Hör mir auf mit R 2: wenn das heute noch hinhaut, kotze ich aus dem Fenster.
...weil du schon draussen bist oder wie?
hatte die us-futures auch auf dem schirm, nasdaq @s1, s&p gekauft 1/2 schon gegeben
und während ich das schreibe rest @einstand geflogen dabei hatte ich TP @TH
aber wo r2???? herkommt weiss ich auch nicht
grüße
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.265 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 21:02:38www.tribun.com
....oh,oh
Alter Junge, das ist aber NICHT von Dir, oder?
....oh,oh
Alter Junge, das ist aber NICHT von Dir, oder?
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.265 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 21:02:38 da ist ein gewisser sättigungsgrad entnehmbar frag nitt bei mir ... warte... umme -30
the wall of fear...
die kriechen alle rauf bis erst einmal 7000
die kriechen alle rauf bis erst einmal 7000
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.341 von ortlepp am 08.04.08 21:09:56frag nitt bei mir ... warte... umme -30
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.324 von skywoolf am 08.04.08 21:08:28doch ...ist das neue orderbuch
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.348 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 21:11:27-30 pkt heute
ORTLEPP AM PRANGER
ORTLEPP AM PRANGER
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.324 von skywoolf am 08.04.08 21:08:28Neiiiiiiiiiiiinnnn
........man, wo ist der Schlüssel für die Handschellen....ich muß shorts kaufen....
Kein Abgabedruck im Daxi, noch einen gelongt.
so leute bin hier mal wech. wenn ich mir die letzten tage so durchlese bringt mir persönlich das nichts mehr. gibt hier nur streitereien, frage nach beweisen, aber das was ich mir wünsche nicht. danke allen für tolle charts, nachbetrachtungen.... was mir, fehlt ist und das geht hier unter, mm. konkrete aussagen. nen chart hab ich selber. egal, wahrscheinlich hab ich mich jetzt wieder falsch ausgedrückt oder werde falsch verstanden, wenn wer fragen hat, bin noch da.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.359 von ortlepp am 08.04.08 21:13:24
Das tut mir wirklich leid.
Bis auf den Gewinn eben, ist mir tagsüber nur sehr sehr bescheiden was gelungen.
Irgendwie ist der Wurm drin.
Das tut mir wirklich leid.
Bis auf den Gewinn eben, ist mir tagsüber nur sehr sehr bescheiden was gelungen.
Irgendwie ist der Wurm drin.
könnt ne S-K-S ausbilden..........
oder auch nicht..........
oder auch nicht..........
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.377 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 21:15:25bin selber schuld, dazu heute morgen ABN fort, konnte SL im USD/CAD nitt nachziehn, TakeProfit nitt erreicht, war 30 pippen vornen, fett
irgendwie klingt alles nach pause bei mir
irgendwie klingt alles nach pause bei mir
n'abend....
60er bildschen von gestern abend ...
JJ
60er bildschen von gestern abend ...
JJ
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.839.792 von Tribun100 am 08.04.08 20:11:01Gleich sagen sich die notorisch positiven Amis " Ist doch alles garnicht so schlimm ".
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.391 von ditano am 08.04.08 21:16:51 ne sks im 5er hat kaum aussagekraft ...... aber dein deadly thrust war ne gute ansage. lese hier gerade etwas quer.
Wenn schon beim Ami nichts passiert, vielleicht gehts ja morgen beim Japaner hoch:
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.426 von Lord_Feric am 08.04.08 21:20:17..jo long in Pfizer...
runter du fieh; ich raste noch aus
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.418 von JJ-WALSRODE am 08.04.08 21:19:30
hatte mich vertan; das ding heisst dead end thrust.
hat übrigens immer noch gültigkeit.
erwarte ein erneutes anlaufen der marke und dann short
hatte mich vertan; das ding heisst dead end thrust.
hat übrigens immer noch gültigkeit.
erwarte ein erneutes anlaufen der marke und dann short
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.374 von Tellerwscher73 am 08.04.08 21:15:06was mir, fehlt ist und das geht hier unter, mm. konkrete aussagen. nen chart hab ich selber.
hmmm, das ist doch eigentlich schon die antwort auf das was du vermisst, nicht falsch verstehen, aber das was ich ansagen könnte (bzw. schon gemacht habe) sind pivots, gaps, highs/lows...
eben das was im chart wirklich für jeden zu sehen ist
für mich ist das interessanteste hier schon eben charts, besonders mit denen @JJ kann ich viel anfangen, unterstützungen in mittlerer, evtl. höheren zeitebenen mit buy/sell-bereich
..tipps bzw. lehrreiche sachen bzgl. risk-/moneymanagement/disziplin @LBR sind auch interessant und manchmal auch was eben zur abwechslung zum bildschirm-glotzen was auch manchmal auch nervt
aber das mit streitereien und so kann ich dich verstehen, unnötig mmn in so einem forum, beweise sind mir piepegal, ich glaub jedem ALLES, wenn begründungen da sind noch besser, wers nötig hat zu prahlen oder sowas in der art ist nicht mein problem.
gruß
hmmm, das ist doch eigentlich schon die antwort auf das was du vermisst, nicht falsch verstehen, aber das was ich ansagen könnte (bzw. schon gemacht habe) sind pivots, gaps, highs/lows...
eben das was im chart wirklich für jeden zu sehen ist
für mich ist das interessanteste hier schon eben charts, besonders mit denen @JJ kann ich viel anfangen, unterstützungen in mittlerer, evtl. höheren zeitebenen mit buy/sell-bereich
..tipps bzw. lehrreiche sachen bzgl. risk-/moneymanagement/disziplin @LBR sind auch interessant und manchmal auch was eben zur abwechslung zum bildschirm-glotzen was auch manchmal auch nervt
aber das mit streitereien und so kann ich dich verstehen, unnötig mmn in so einem forum, beweise sind mir piepegal, ich glaub jedem ALLES, wenn begründungen da sind noch besser, wers nötig hat zu prahlen oder sowas in der art ist nicht mein problem.
gruß
So wie es aussieht SK im DOW über 12600
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.444 von ditano am 08.04.08 21:23:216807 würde sich anbieten..und dann boing
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.444 von ditano am 08.04.08 21:23:21is doch egal wie dat ding heißt, die ansage zu der zeit war so richtig gut.....
heute erwarte ich garnet mehr viel .... und für morgen bastel ich mir gerade meinen plan
JJ
heute erwarte ich garnet mehr viel .... und für morgen bastel ich mir gerade meinen plan
JJ
Red Bull verleiht Flügel
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.454 von CasinoFDAX86 am 08.04.08 21:24:07war ja auch nicht gegen dich gerichtet.
aber les dir den schrääd doch mal von anfang durch,
du hast mich schon vestanden.
kann ja auch alles so bleiben wie es ist. hab doch nichts dagegen, war nur nen denkanstoß.
aber les dir den schrääd doch mal von anfang durch,
du hast mich schon vestanden.
kann ja auch alles so bleiben wie es ist. hab doch nichts dagegen, war nur nen denkanstoß.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.456 von kaju66 am 08.04.08 21:24:28So wie es aussieht SK im DOW über 12600
Bist voll long drin, was..?..
Bist voll long drin, was..?..
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.454 von CasinoFDAX86 am 08.04.08 21:24:07danke ..... - aber meine charts sind so etwas von einfach - und halt oft ein wenn oder aber, doch so läuft es am markt eben so. NIEMAND kann irgendwelche punktgenauen ansagen machen, man kann nur die wahrscheinlichkeiten der richtung auf der jeweiligen zeiteben eingrenzen. bernie macht es auch net anders, wenn bruch da, dann ist die wahrscheinlichkeit hoch das das erreicht wird usw.....
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.523 von Deni1968 am 08.04.08 21:31:42Yep
USD/CAD nochmal VK 1.0369/1.0366
bis morsche
bis morsche
short rüssel 709,3
und deine MORGENCHARTS fehlen mir ....... ich würde sie nicht viel anders malen
na kommt,...ich will min ticks 1200 sehen!!
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.557 von JJ-WALSRODE am 08.04.08 21:37:17@CASINO - das stimmt
Da denkt man, das Ding springt endlich mal an und dann verhungert die Bewegung nach 2 Minuten schon wieder
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.515 von Tellerwscher73 am 08.04.08 21:31:16nabend habe deinen zwist mit hexal aber auch nicht verstanden, jedoch wohl auch nicht alle postings von euch 2 turteltäubchen gelesen
bin long seit 6740 im dax (11:55) und reg mich auf dass "dem tier" nicht richtig hoch will, habe schon 2 mal ins minus laufen lassen, will doch noch die 6900 sehen für meine posi wird aber wohl ein traum bleiben.. wenn ich heute noch vor börsenschluss schmeiße..
schönen abend!
bin long seit 6740 im dax (11:55) und reg mich auf dass "dem tier" nicht richtig hoch will, habe schon 2 mal ins minus laufen lassen, will doch noch die 6900 sehen für meine posi wird aber wohl ein traum bleiben.. wenn ich heute noch vor börsenschluss schmeiße..
schönen abend!
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.560 von LBR am 08.04.08 21:37:37Iss noch bissl wenig.
hallo,
hat jemand IB ?
im dax Future werden bei mir seit ner halben Stunde keine Orders mehr übermittelt...
geht das bei euch ?
hat jemand IB ?
im dax Future werden bei mir seit ner halben Stunde keine Orders mehr übermittelt...
geht das bei euch ?
Fdax 6824
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.586 von kaju66 am 08.04.08 21:40:59hmmm,....dachte eigentlich dass dow ins plus zieht,...na mal kucken,...jetzt evtl. neuer spike up
im 30 min chart muß der SP min auf 1372 nur um wieder in den alten Trendkanal zu kommen mach mal nachher nen Bild
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.524 von JJ-WALSRODE am 08.04.08 21:32:10eben...ich mags einfach, die breite masse handelt doch eben dann diese unterstützungen/widerstände oder sie werden eben gebrochen und dann ist ein neues ziel aktiviert. wenn man in der gegenposition ist greift der stop.
bzgl. morgencharts :
dachte da auch wegen der einfachheit, dass sie nicht so der bringer sind weil ausser von dir, bernie und flori911 keine resonanz kam, kann aber demnächst mal wieder konstanter was reinstellen, meist zeichne ich sie sowieso für eben meinen handel.
gruß
bzgl. morgencharts :
dachte da auch wegen der einfachheit, dass sie nicht so der bringer sind weil ausser von dir, bernie und flori911 keine resonanz kam, kann aber demnächst mal wieder konstanter was reinstellen, meist zeichne ich sie sowieso für eben meinen handel.
gruß
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.592 von Deni1968 am 08.04.08 21:42:32Versuch es, stopp steht. Brauch ich aber glaube nicht.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.611 von CasinoFDAX86 am 08.04.08 21:44:47denke es haben viele beachtet, danke dass du dir die mühe gemacht hast!
nur weil keine resonanz kommt heisst es nicht dass der beitrag nicht von vielen beachtet und geschätzt wird
nur weil keine resonanz kommt heisst es nicht dass der beitrag nicht von vielen beachtet und geschätzt wird
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.603 von LBR am 08.04.08 21:43:49Bin ich auch von ausgegangen, mal nachbörse abwarten.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.566 von Bravouroes am 08.04.08 21:38:14dann lies bitte alles, bild dir dann ne meinung und dann können wir darüber diskutieren, über bm, da es nicht mehr hierher gehört.
hierher gehören nur noch ihre screens und dann kommen meine. weil das brauch sie.
ps. ich hab sie nicht irgentwie anmachen wollen.
so nu aus.
gucke jetzt mal den markt und gut.
hierher gehören nur noch ihre screens und dann kommen meine. weil das brauch sie.
ps. ich hab sie nicht irgentwie anmachen wollen.
so nu aus.
gucke jetzt mal den markt und gut.
nikkei könnte heute nacht abwärtstrend knacken...
könnte
könnte
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.645 von kaju66 am 08.04.08 21:48:37Dax gibt aber nix ab.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.603 von LBR am 08.04.08 21:43:49hallo ...
long im bereich YM 12525 war eigentlich kein großes risiko, den stop hätte man auf S1 legen können - doch der daily R2 liegt irgendwo bei 12800
ich zweifel das nicht an, mich interessiert nur wie du darauf kommst????
ich denke auch wieder an höhere kurse, sofern der obrige bereich hält, aber auf deinen zielbereich komme ich nicht, SORRY!!! - vielleicht denke ich auch nur zu kurz
JJ
long im bereich YM 12525 war eigentlich kein großes risiko, den stop hätte man auf S1 legen können - doch der daily R2 liegt irgendwo bei 12800
ich zweifel das nicht an, mich interessiert nur wie du darauf kommst????
ich denke auch wieder an höhere kurse, sofern der obrige bereich hält, aber auf deinen zielbereich komme ich nicht, SORRY!!! - vielleicht denke ich auch nur zu kurz
JJ
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.663 von Tellerwscher73 am 08.04.08 21:51:34eben die longs verkauft zu 6765,74 wird also gleich noch mal nen satz nach oben machen ist immer so wenn ich longs verkaufe
verkaufe nur weil ich nicht über nacht halten will und abn in den letzten 30 sekunden verkaufen ist schon mal in die hose gegangen.
nicht auf oder erregen lassen ist manchmal schwer, aber kostet nur kraft
schönen abend
verkaufe nur weil ich nicht über nacht halten will und abn in den letzten 30 sekunden verkaufen ist schon mal in die hose gegangen.
nicht auf oder erregen lassen ist manchmal schwer, aber kostet nur kraft
schönen abend
Na - ich schau noch mal rein.
Hat sich ja benommen der Dow.
Kann ich gar nicht meckern.
Alles im Rahmen ohne Kerze und son Gedöns.
Hat sich ja benommen der Dow.
Kann ich gar nicht meckern.
Alles im Rahmen ohne Kerze und son Gedöns.
.......und da haben wir es schon wieder !!!!!
Dax hat den Stand von 8 Uhr !
Dax hat den Stand von 8 Uhr !
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.713 von Bravouroes am 08.04.08 21:56:27glückwunsch
halte on
bin morgen nicht mehr hier, wird mirauch fehlen, bringt mir aber nichts.
sollte hexal screens bringen dann mal bescheid. dann kommen meine, damit sie befriedigt ist.
haut rein freunde!
halte on
bin morgen nicht mehr hier, wird mirauch fehlen, bringt mir aber nichts.
sollte hexal screens bringen dann mal bescheid. dann kommen meine, damit sie befriedigt ist.
haut rein freunde!
Dow zu und ym steigt, was auch sonst?
Hoffe noch auf paar gute Zahlen, melde mich dann mal ordnungsgemäss ab.
Good N8
Good N8
...ob ich meine Dax Puts morgen noch zu einem guten Kurs verkauft bekomme? Ich wage es zu bewzeifeln, der Dow legt nachbörslich schon wieder zu.
Wenn Asien heute im Minus schließt, könnte ich Glück haben. Der Markt hat ja fest damit gerechnet, dass die wichtige Unterstützung bei 12700 ins Visier genommen wird. Auch ist der seitwärtsgehende E/Y kein Zeichen für Shorts im Markt.
Wird wohl morgen im Dax Richtung 6850-6900 gehen. Mal sehen.
Wenn Asien heute im Minus schließt, könnte ich Glück haben. Der Markt hat ja fest damit gerechnet, dass die wichtige Unterstützung bei 12700 ins Visier genommen wird. Auch ist der seitwärtsgehende E/Y kein Zeichen für Shorts im Markt.
Wird wohl morgen im Dax Richtung 6850-6900 gehen. Mal sehen.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.840.839 von Lord_Feric am 08.04.08 22:07:41
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.841.097 von Mr.Question am 08.04.08 22:36:06 - hatte aber vorhin im 60er darauf hingewiesen.....
- morgen kann wieder alles anders sein
RESPEKT LBR
guts nächtle allen
JJ
- morgen kann wieder alles anders sein
RESPEKT LBR
guts nächtle allen
JJ
hier mal meine meinungen, morgenchart heute mal im alten thread, da komm ich morgen früh nicht zu
cmcdax15min:
2h:
daily:
bildchen sind selbsterklärend, morgen interessant ob es richtung gap-close geht oder an die untere kanallinie, alles kann, nichts muss
wie JJ sagt: schöner entry @LBR, TH war richtig, mich hat MEIN fehler aus dem trade geworfen
gruß
cmcdax15min:
2h:
daily:
bildchen sind selbsterklärend, morgen interessant ob es richtung gap-close geht oder an die untere kanallinie, alles kann, nichts muss
wie JJ sagt: schöner entry @LBR, TH war richtig, mich hat MEIN fehler aus dem trade geworfen
gruß
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.841.228 von CasinoFDAX86 am 08.04.08 22:52:45von meiner seite: uneingeschränkte zustimmung .......
ja, sehr schlüssige Bildchen!
Jetzt liegt es in asiatischen Händen.
Nikkei wird vermutlich etwas abgeben.
Jetzt liegt es in asiatischen Händen.
Nikkei wird vermutlich etwas abgeben.
Nachti @ all
Bin overnight long @ 6745 - mal gucken ob das Plus bis Morgen hält.
6800 ist mein Ziel.
Bin overnight long @ 6745 - mal gucken ob das Plus bis Morgen hält.
6800 ist mein Ziel.
...jetzt fällt der YM wieder unter die 12600. viellleicht habe ich ja doch glück, das GAP wird nicht geschlossen und wir sehen bald doch wieder fallende Kurse. sehr spannend, der morgige tag könne die richtung der nächsten vorgeben.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.841.458 von Mr.Question am 08.04.08 23:35:23Warum sollte morgen viel passieren? Also wirklich relevante News stehen erst am Do. bzw. Freitag an.
Ich rechne morgen mit einem weiter sehr lustlosen Handeln in FFM. Heute ging ja schon nach 11 Uhr kaum mehr etwas. Morgen könnte so ein Tag werden, wo man besser gleich ganz im Bett bleibt, weil sich die Kurse kaum bewegen.
Ich rechne morgen mit einem weiter sehr lustlosen Handeln in FFM. Heute ging ja schon nach 11 Uhr kaum mehr etwas. Morgen könnte so ein Tag werden, wo man besser gleich ganz im Bett bleibt, weil sich die Kurse kaum bewegen.
einverstanden -passieren wird vermutlich nicht viel, aber die obere oder unter range wird vermutlich getestet werden, was die richtung für die folgende tage vorgeben könnte.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.841.527 von Mr.Question am 08.04.08 23:55:10ich übersetzte mal: passiert nichts, könnte mal nach oben gehen,mmmmhhhh vielleicht nach unten. und dann wenn das vorbei leite ich die richtung für di nächsten tage ab.
hab over night Long TB1K3J drinne gelassen KK 0,66 o. 0,67, weiss ich gar nimmer genau. Müsste auf jeden Fall Morgen 40 Pkt höher stehen. Ich mach das aber nur mit kleinen Summen, 1000€ max.
Klreinvieh macht aber auch......
Klreinvieh macht aber auch......
ei ei ei, hab eben gesehen, dass ich sogar zu 0,52 nachgekauft hab. Hatte ich wohl paar Longdrinks zu viel und viel Glück. Ui Ui Ui, muss mal bissi an der Disziplin arbeiten.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.841.796 von neubert03 am 09.04.08 03:27:27" ... sogar zu 0,52 nachgekauft ... "
Hehehe. Klaro, Verluste macht hier sowie keiner.
Hehehe. Klaro, Verluste macht hier sowie keiner.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.841.800 von CaptainProton am 09.04.08 03:47:28hey Du TRottel, ich hab das hier paar stunden vorher geposted. Ausserdem sieht heute morgen alles wieder anders aus.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.841.891 von neubert03 am 09.04.08 06:49:29" ... Ausserdem sieht heute morgen alles wieder anders aus ... "
Erzähl nicht, dass Du die Scheine über Nacht bei eBay mit Gewinn verkauft hast.
Erzähl nicht, dass Du die Scheine über Nacht bei eBay mit Gewinn verkauft hast.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.841.790 von neubert03 am 09.04.08 03:01:31hab over night Long TB1K3J drinne gelassen KK 0,66 o. 0,67, weiss ich gar nimmer genau. Müsste auf jeden Fall Morgen 40 Pkt höher stehen.
über Nacht so enge Scheine ist nicht das Wahre...aktuell 35cent rum
über Nacht so enge Scheine ist nicht das Wahre...aktuell 35cent rum
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie eine neue Diskussion.
Investoren beobachten auch:
Wertpapier | Perf. % |
---|---|
+0,71 | |
-0,54 | |
-1,12 | |
+0,37 | |
+3,71 | |
+1,46 | |
+1,11 | |
+0,30 | |
-0,55 | |
-0,10 |
Meistdiskutiert
Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
---|---|---|
195 | ||
127 | ||
81 | ||
78 | ||
46 | ||
45 | ||
38 | ||
37 | ||
29 | ||
26 |
14:49 Uhr · dpa-AFX · RTL Group |
14:48 Uhr · IG Europe · DAXAnzeige |
13:27 Uhr · dpa-AFX · Assicurazioni Generali |
13:07 Uhr · dpa-AFX · Danaher |
11:58 Uhr · dpa-AFX · RTL Group |
11:42 Uhr · dpa-AFX · SAP |
11:33 Uhr · dpa-AFX · Münchener Rück |
10:30 Uhr · Der Aktionär TV · Bayer |
10:21 Uhr · dpa-AFX · Henkel VZ |
10:18 Uhr · Markus Fugmann · DAXAnzeige |
Zeit | Titel |
---|---|
16:16 Uhr | |
16:03 Uhr | |
12:19 Uhr | |
10:10 Uhr | |
08:55 Uhr | |
08:42 Uhr | |
08:13 Uhr | |
22.04.24 | |
21.04.24 | |
21.04.24 |