Pariser Minister: 'Anfang vom Ende der Arroganz von Monsanto-Bayer' (Seite 29) | Diskussion im Forum
eröffnet am 13.08.18 15:36:11 von
neuester Beitrag 09.03.24 09:05:26 von
neuester Beitrag 09.03.24 09:05:26 von
Beiträge: 509
ID: 1.286.272
ID: 1.286.272
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 62.148
Gesamt: 62.148
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: DE000BAY0017 · WKN: BAY001 · Symbol: BAYN
26,26
EUR
-0,08 %
-0,02 EUR
Letzter Kurs 20:27:07 Tradegate
Neuigkeiten
17.04.24 · wallstreetONLINE Redaktion |
| Bayer Aktien ab 5,80 Euro handeln - Ohne versteckte Kosten!Anzeige |
19:00 Uhr · Felix Haupt Anzeige |
09:09 Uhr · BörsenNEWS.de |
Vom Pharma-Thron gekickt: Bayer: Kursziel um knapp ein Drittel gesenktWerte aus der Branche Pharmaindustrie
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 3,5800 | +922,86 | |
| 1,0400 | +48,57 | |
| 0,5400 | +38,46 | |
| 5,4000 | +27,06 | |
| 1,8250 | +25,86 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 14,510 | -32,32 | |
| 28,18 | -32,62 | |
| 3,6400 | -38,62 | |
| 0,5660 | -40,42 | |
| 84,75 | -74,50 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 58.929.510 von faultcode am 11.10.18 13:25:51Ja es wird noch viel von den Agenturen geschrieben und interpretiert.
Hier die Stimme von Rechtsprofessor D. Levine, der den Prozess vor Ort verfolgt und die Aussage der Richterin doch etwas anders gewichtet (als gewisse erhoffen):
http://www.wbrc.com/2018/10/11/judge-mulls-new-trial-million…
Zusammengefasst: Die Richterin hat sich nicht gegen die Strafmass bei der "punitive damage" (250Mio&) ausgesprochen ( I don't think she was persuaded..) sondern gegen die Höhe der Kompensationssumme (39 Mio$) für Mr. Johnson.
Wie so üblich in den USA, wird man eine mildere Strafe erreichen- wie substantiell das Ergebnis sein wird, ist offen. Aber aus dem Vorwurf der Vertuschung und Verschleierung und somit der Sorgfaltspflichtverletzung kann sich Bayer(Monsanto) m.E. kaum herauswinden. Ein Grossteil des Archivs von Monsanto wurde während des Prozesses durchforstet (15 Mio Seiten eingescannt!) und ist auch der Klägerseite zugänglich (Discovery).
Hier die Stimme von Rechtsprofessor D. Levine, der den Prozess vor Ort verfolgt und die Aussage der Richterin doch etwas anders gewichtet (als gewisse erhoffen):
http://www.wbrc.com/2018/10/11/judge-mulls-new-trial-million…
Zusammengefasst: Die Richterin hat sich nicht gegen die Strafmass bei der "punitive damage" (250Mio&) ausgesprochen ( I don't think she was persuaded..) sondern gegen die Höhe der Kompensationssumme (39 Mio$) für Mr. Johnson.
Wie so üblich in den USA, wird man eine mildere Strafe erreichen- wie substantiell das Ergebnis sein wird, ist offen. Aber aus dem Vorwurf der Vertuschung und Verschleierung und somit der Sorgfaltspflichtverletzung kann sich Bayer(Monsanto) m.E. kaum herauswinden. Ein Grossteil des Archivs von Monsanto wurde während des Prozesses durchforstet (15 Mio Seiten eingescannt!) und ist auch der Klägerseite zugänglich (Discovery).
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 58.929.378 von faultcode am 11.10.18 13:11:51
https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/business/aroundregion/st…
=>
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A San Francisco judge said Wednesday she is considering tossing out the lion's share of the $289 million judgment against agribusiness giant Monsanto and ordering a new trial over whether the company's weed-killer caused a groundskeeper's cancer.
San Francisco Superior Court Judge Suzanne Bolanos didn't formally rule on any issues after a two-hour hearing to consider Monsanto's demand to toss out the entire jury verdict in the first of thousands of similar cases across the country to go to trial.
The San Francisco jury in August said Monsanto knew — or should have known — its best-selling Roundup weed-killer causes cancer and hit the company with $250 million in punitive damages, which are designed to punish companies who act recklessly. The jury also awarded DeWayne Johnson $33 million in so-called "pain-and-suffering" damages and $6 million in actual damages.
But Bolanos issued a written tentative ruling ahead of the hearing saying she intended to strike down the punitive damages and schedule a new trial on that issue.
During the hearing, Bolanos also said she was troubled by the $33 million in "non-economic" pain-and-suffering damages the jury awarded. Johnson's lawyer argued for $1 million a year for the next 33 years. But Monsanto's lawyers argued that Johnson is expected to live for two more years — an argument that appeared to resonate with Bolanos who mulled out loud about fashioning an order reducing the entire verdict to under $9 million.
Ultimately, Bolanos ordered lawyers to submit written argument by Friday and said she would rule after that.
Johnson and his lawyers left court without comment. So did Monsanto's legal team.
However, Bayer AG, which acquired Monsanto in June, said it agreed with the judge and "continues to believe that the evidence at trial does not support the verdict and the damage awards."
"The jury's verdict was wholly at odds with over 40 years of real-world use, an extensive body of scientific data and analysis ... and approvals in 160 countries, which support the conclusion that glyphosate-based herbicides are safe when used as directed and that glyphosate is not carcinogenic," Bayer's statement said.
"Tentative rulings are common in California and it's rare for judges to reverse themselves," said David Levine, a professor at the University of California's Hastings Law School in San Francisco.
During the hearing, the judge said she was concerned with improper statements Johnson's lawyer Brent Wisner made during his closing arguments. Despite the judge's order not to, Wisner compared Monsanto to tobacco companies and said company executives would be drinking champagne in their boardroom if the jury sided with the St. Louis-based company.
The judge admonished the jury to disregard those comments at the time, but wondered Wednesday if they entitled Monsanto to a new trial.
"It was intentional and purposeful," Monsanto attorney George Lombardi argued.
Johnson's lawyer Michael Miller said the judge's admonition during the closing arguments was sufficient.
"The jury did not miscarry justice," Miller said. "Its decision was unanimous it should be respected."
In her tentative ruling, Bolanos wrote that plaintiff Johnson failed to produce "clear and convincing evidence of malice or oppression" by Monsanto. She wrote that he did not provide any evidence that Monsanto employees believed that exposure to the product caused his lymphoma.
Monsanto had argued ahead of the hearing that Johnson failed to prove that Roundup or similar herbicides caused his lymphoma and presented no evidence that Monsanto executives were malicious in marketing it.
Regulators around the world have concluded on "multiple occasions" that the active ingredient in Roundup — glyphosate — is not a human carcinogen, the attorneys said in court documents. They called the jury verdict extraordinary and said it requires "exceptional scrutiny."
Johnson's attorneys responded in court documents that the jury was well-educated and attentive. The evidence at trial was "more than sufficient to support an inference" that Johnson's cancer was caused by his exposure to Monsanto's herbicides, the attorneys said.
"Mr. Johnson's story is tragic and could have been prevented if Monsanto actually showed a modicum of care about human safety," they said.
Johnson's lawsuit is among hundreds alleging Roundup caused cancer, but it was the first one to go to trial. The jury in August determined that Roundup contributed to Johnson's cancer and Monsanto should have provided a label warning of a potential health hazard.
Johnson sprayed Roundup and a similar product, Ranger Pro, at his job as a pest control manager at a San Francisco Bay Area school district, according to his attorneys. He was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 2014 at age 42.
Many government regulators have rejected a link between glyphosate and cancer. Monsanto has vehemently denied such a connection, saying hundreds of studies have established that glyphosate is safe.
=> no "clear and convincing evidence of malice or oppression" --> na bitte.
admonition = Ermahnung
California judge will order new trial in 9 million Roundup award
Updated at 10:29 p.m. on Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2018.https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/business/aroundregion/st…
=>
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A San Francisco judge said Wednesday she is considering tossing out the lion's share of the $289 million judgment against agribusiness giant Monsanto and ordering a new trial over whether the company's weed-killer caused a groundskeeper's cancer.
San Francisco Superior Court Judge Suzanne Bolanos didn't formally rule on any issues after a two-hour hearing to consider Monsanto's demand to toss out the entire jury verdict in the first of thousands of similar cases across the country to go to trial.
The San Francisco jury in August said Monsanto knew — or should have known — its best-selling Roundup weed-killer causes cancer and hit the company with $250 million in punitive damages, which are designed to punish companies who act recklessly. The jury also awarded DeWayne Johnson $33 million in so-called "pain-and-suffering" damages and $6 million in actual damages.
But Bolanos issued a written tentative ruling ahead of the hearing saying she intended to strike down the punitive damages and schedule a new trial on that issue.
During the hearing, Bolanos also said she was troubled by the $33 million in "non-economic" pain-and-suffering damages the jury awarded. Johnson's lawyer argued for $1 million a year for the next 33 years. But Monsanto's lawyers argued that Johnson is expected to live for two more years — an argument that appeared to resonate with Bolanos who mulled out loud about fashioning an order reducing the entire verdict to under $9 million.
Ultimately, Bolanos ordered lawyers to submit written argument by Friday and said she would rule after that.
Johnson and his lawyers left court without comment. So did Monsanto's legal team.
However, Bayer AG, which acquired Monsanto in June, said it agreed with the judge and "continues to believe that the evidence at trial does not support the verdict and the damage awards."
"The jury's verdict was wholly at odds with over 40 years of real-world use, an extensive body of scientific data and analysis ... and approvals in 160 countries, which support the conclusion that glyphosate-based herbicides are safe when used as directed and that glyphosate is not carcinogenic," Bayer's statement said.
"Tentative rulings are common in California and it's rare for judges to reverse themselves," said David Levine, a professor at the University of California's Hastings Law School in San Francisco.
During the hearing, the judge said she was concerned with improper statements Johnson's lawyer Brent Wisner made during his closing arguments. Despite the judge's order not to, Wisner compared Monsanto to tobacco companies and said company executives would be drinking champagne in their boardroom if the jury sided with the St. Louis-based company.
The judge admonished the jury to disregard those comments at the time, but wondered Wednesday if they entitled Monsanto to a new trial.
"It was intentional and purposeful," Monsanto attorney George Lombardi argued.
Johnson's lawyer Michael Miller said the judge's admonition during the closing arguments was sufficient.
"The jury did not miscarry justice," Miller said. "Its decision was unanimous it should be respected."
In her tentative ruling, Bolanos wrote that plaintiff Johnson failed to produce "clear and convincing evidence of malice or oppression" by Monsanto. She wrote that he did not provide any evidence that Monsanto employees believed that exposure to the product caused his lymphoma.
Monsanto had argued ahead of the hearing that Johnson failed to prove that Roundup or similar herbicides caused his lymphoma and presented no evidence that Monsanto executives were malicious in marketing it.
Regulators around the world have concluded on "multiple occasions" that the active ingredient in Roundup — glyphosate — is not a human carcinogen, the attorneys said in court documents. They called the jury verdict extraordinary and said it requires "exceptional scrutiny."
Johnson's attorneys responded in court documents that the jury was well-educated and attentive. The evidence at trial was "more than sufficient to support an inference" that Johnson's cancer was caused by his exposure to Monsanto's herbicides, the attorneys said.
"Mr. Johnson's story is tragic and could have been prevented if Monsanto actually showed a modicum of care about human safety," they said.
Johnson's lawsuit is among hundreds alleging Roundup caused cancer, but it was the first one to go to trial. The jury in August determined that Roundup contributed to Johnson's cancer and Monsanto should have provided a label warning of a potential health hazard.
Johnson sprayed Roundup and a similar product, Ranger Pro, at his job as a pest control manager at a San Francisco Bay Area school district, according to his attorneys. He was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 2014 at age 42.
Many government regulators have rejected a link between glyphosate and cancer. Monsanto has vehemently denied such a connection, saying hundreds of studies have established that glyphosate is safe.
=> no "clear and convincing evidence of malice or oppression" --> na bitte.
admonition = Ermahnung
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 58.929.378 von faultcode am 11.10.18 13:11:51In re: Roundup Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2741)
https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/VC/roundupmdl
https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/VC/roundupmdl
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 58.923.483 von faultcode am 10.10.18 22:48:25
Bayer-Aktie im Aufwind nach Glyphosat-Etappensieg
http://www.manager-magazin.de/unternehmen/industrie/bayer-er…
=>
...
Punktsieg vor Gericht für Bayer: Der US-Prozess gegen die Bayer-Tochter Monsanto um glyphosathaltige Unkrautvernichtungsmittel wird wohl neu aufgerollt.
Richterin Suzanne Bolanos gab in San Francisco vorläufig dem Antrag von Monsanto statt, die Strafzahlungen in Höhe von 250 Millionen Dollar neu zu verhandeln. Die Parteien hätten nun bis Freitag Zeit, ihre Stellungnahmen abzugeben.
Bayer Börsen-Chart zeigen begrüßte die Entscheidung. Damit würde, falls vom Gericht bestätigt, der zugesprochene Strafschadenersatz aufgehoben, erklärte der Konzern am Donnerstag. "Bayer ist weiterhin davon überzeugt, dass das Urteil und die Schadenersatzforderungen im Widerspruch zu den im Prozess vorgelegten Beweisen stehen."
Die Hoffnung auf ein milderes Urteil gab der Bayer-Aktie Börsen-Chart zeigen kräftig Auftrieb. Zeitweise war sie mit einem Plus von fünf Prozent einziger Gewinner im Dax. "Es schaut nun so
aus, als ob die ursprüngliche Strafe erheblich reduziert wird, wenn sie nicht ganz auf Null gestrichen wird", sagte Analyst Markus Mayer von der Baader Helvea Bank.
Das Pendel könne nun zugunsten des Konzerns umschwingen, der sich gegen Tausende Klagen in den USA verteidigen müsse...
DAX-Leader - schon wieder! > +4%
11.10.Bayer-Aktie im Aufwind nach Glyphosat-Etappensieg
http://www.manager-magazin.de/unternehmen/industrie/bayer-er…
=>
...
Punktsieg vor Gericht für Bayer: Der US-Prozess gegen die Bayer-Tochter Monsanto um glyphosathaltige Unkrautvernichtungsmittel wird wohl neu aufgerollt.
Richterin Suzanne Bolanos gab in San Francisco vorläufig dem Antrag von Monsanto statt, die Strafzahlungen in Höhe von 250 Millionen Dollar neu zu verhandeln. Die Parteien hätten nun bis Freitag Zeit, ihre Stellungnahmen abzugeben.
Bayer Börsen-Chart zeigen begrüßte die Entscheidung. Damit würde, falls vom Gericht bestätigt, der zugesprochene Strafschadenersatz aufgehoben, erklärte der Konzern am Donnerstag. "Bayer ist weiterhin davon überzeugt, dass das Urteil und die Schadenersatzforderungen im Widerspruch zu den im Prozess vorgelegten Beweisen stehen."
Die Hoffnung auf ein milderes Urteil gab der Bayer-Aktie Börsen-Chart zeigen kräftig Auftrieb. Zeitweise war sie mit einem Plus von fünf Prozent einziger Gewinner im Dax. "Es schaut nun so
aus, als ob die ursprüngliche Strafe erheblich reduziert wird, wenn sie nicht ganz auf Null gestrichen wird", sagte Analyst Markus Mayer von der Baader Helvea Bank.
Das Pendel könne nun zugunsten des Konzerns umschwingen, der sich gegen Tausende Klagen in den USA verteidigen müsse...
Bayer-Aktie im Aufwind: Befreiungsschlag dank Sparten-Verkauf?
http://www.deraktionaer.de/aktie/bayer-aktie-im-aufwind--bef…=> nebenbei: das machte Pfizer seinerzeit auch (--> Zoetis -- wer sich gut auskennt
)=> der Rest ist Geschichte...
Trading Spotlight
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 58.813.166 von guensing am 27.09.18 13:33:01Sage ja immer: Bayer soll sich von Monsanto wieder trennen. Das Dreckszeug von Monsanto will in Europe eh keiner - Aspirin und Co braucht wirklich jeder! ;-)
Also der Börsewert von Bayer ohne Monsanto wäre jedenfalls höher, oder nicht! :O
WWW
Also der Börsewert von Bayer ohne Monsanto wäre jedenfalls höher, oder nicht! :O
WWW
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 58.812.932 von WernaWillsWissen am 27.09.18 13:08:11
moderne, latent riskante landwirtschaftliche Angebote so zu optimieren, dass sie keine Gefahr,
sondern nur Segen für die Menschheit bedeuten. Man soll die wissenschaftlichen Fähigkeiten von
Bayer nicht unterschätzen. Mit typisch deutscher Angst ist wirklich keinem geholfen.
Bayer ist wissenschaftlich herausragend.
Bayer hat viele gesudheits- und lebensrettende Medikamente. Bayer wird es auch hinbekommen,moderne, latent riskante landwirtschaftliche Angebote so zu optimieren, dass sie keine Gefahr,
sondern nur Segen für die Menschheit bedeuten. Man soll die wissenschaftlichen Fähigkeiten von
Bayer nicht unterschätzen. Mit typisch deutscher Angst ist wirklich keinem geholfen.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 58.809.257 von Sulzbach am 27.09.18 04:21:02Bayer hat eine riesige Produktpalette und sollte sich einfach auf das Konzentrieren was jeder braucht und unbestritten gut für Mensch, Tier und Natur ist: so wie Aspirin!:-)
www
www
Zitat von Sulzbach: Bayer = GAU der Moral ?
Nun hat Bayer den nächsten Skandal. Das Biensterben hat Bayer Wohlmöglich auf dem Gewissen.
Was glaubt Bayer, wie lange es noch dauert, bis es der Dümmste nachvollzieht?
Bayer wird wohlmöglich als unethischste Aktie des Jahres gewählt.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 58.812.899 von faultcode am 27.09.18 13:05:05.. schon schön wie es langsam steigt! 
Aber bis zur nächsten Gerichtsrunde im Februar 2019 muss man die Gift&GEN-Mischung rechtzeitig wieder loswerden! ;-)
www
Aber bis zur nächsten Gerichtsrunde im Februar 2019 muss man die Gift&GEN-Mischung rechtzeitig wieder loswerden! ;-)
www
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 58.507.413 von faultcode am 22.08.18 13:24:07schon wieder: DAX-Leader!
--> wann war denn das mal in so relativ kurzen Abständen
z.Z. +2.4% L&S RT
--> wann war denn das mal in so relativ kurzen Abständen
z.Z. +2.4% L&S RT
Durchsuchen
Pariser Minister: 'Anfang vom Ende der Arroganz von Monsanto-Bayer'
