checkAd

    ROUNDUP/'WSJ': FBI ermittelt wegen Falschangaben zu Model 3 gegen Tesla (Seite 173) | Diskussion im Forum

    eröffnet am 28.10.18 21:38:04 von
    neuester Beitrag 02.03.24 11:56:15 von
    Beiträge: 10.211
    ID: 1.291.475
    Aufrufe heute: 9
    Gesamt: 652.917
    Aktive User: 0

    Werte aus der Branche Fahrzeugindustrie

    WertpapierKursPerf. %
    0,6500+27,43
    15,270+18,79
    15,570+17,95
    5,1100+17,47
    1,0350+13,85
    WertpapierKursPerf. %
    0,7560-11,68
    29,93-12,04
    5,9000-16,90
    139,00-22,78
    11,200-73,71

    Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben

     Durchsuchen
    • 1
    • 173
    • 1022

    Begriffe und/oder Benutzer

     

    Top-Postings

     Ja Nein
      Avatar
      schrieb am 15.07.22 22:58:14
      Beitrag Nr. 8.491 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.985.136 von faultcode am 14.07.22 22:15:06so ist es:

      15.7.
      Rückzahlung für Klägerin -- Münchner Gericht sieht Sicherheitsmängel bei Tesla-Autopilot
      Eine Tesla-Fahrerin hat in München mit ihrer Klage gegen den Autohersteller gewonnen. Das Gericht wertete das Assistenzsystem Autopilot in ihrem Fahrzeug als unzuverlässig und »massive Gefährdung« im Stadtverkehr.
      https://www.spiegel.de/auto/tesla-landgericht-muenchen-i-sie…
      ...
      Tesla kommentiert das Münchner Verfahren nicht. Der US-Konzern hat Berufung eingelegt, die Klägerin auch: Sie fordert statt des Geldes die Lieferung eines Neufahrzeugs. :laugh:
      Tesla | 714,20 €
      Avatar
      schrieb am 14.07.22 22:15:06
      Beitrag Nr. 8.490 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.976.952 von faultcode am 14.07.22 02:06:02gaaanz langsam -- und scheinbar koordiniert -- schließen sich hier immer mehr Türen (mMn):

      NYT:

      14.7.
      The S.E.C. broadens its inquiry into Elon Musk’s disclosures about Twitter.
      The agency questioned whether a tweet Mr. Musk sent in May about the acquisition of Twitter should have been disclosed to the agency and investors.
      https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/14/technology/twitter-elon-m…
      ...
      The S.E.C. questioned whether Mr. Musk was truly a passive investor, and whether he had disclosed his stake at the right time.

      The law requires shareholders who buy more than 5 percent of a company’s shares to disclose their ownership within 10 days of reaching that threshold. In regulatory filings, Mr. Musk has said he crossed that threshold on March 14 but did not make his purchases public until April 4.

      ...
      Tesla | 713,60 €
      39 Antworten?Die Baumansicht ist in diesem Thread nicht möglich.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 14.07.22 21:53:02
      Beitrag Nr. 8.489 ()
      California: "The review is ongoing." (advertising Tesla FSD)
      Russ Mitchell:

      14.7.
      Musk backed a boast of zero ‘self-driving’ Tesla crashes, but data show otherwise
      https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2022-07-14/elon-musk-…
      ...
      As critics scolded Musk for testing experimental technology on public roads without trained safety drivers as backups, Santa Monica investment manager and vocal Tesla booster Ross Gerber was among the allies who sprang to his defense.

      “There has not been one accident or injury since FSD beta launch,” he tweeted in January. “Not one. Not a single one.”

      To which Musk responded with a single word: “Correct.”

      In fact, by that time dozens of drivers had already filed safety complaints with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration over incidents involving Full Self-Driving — and at least eight of them involved crashes. The complaints are in the public domain, in a database on the NHTSA website. (https://www.nhtsa.gov/nhtsa-datasets-and-apis)
      ...

      California regulations bar a company from advertising a car as full self-driving when it’s not. The state Department of Motor Vehicles is conducting a review of Tesla marketing, a review well into its second year.
      DMV head Steve Gordon has declined to speak publicly about the matter since May 2021. On Wednesday, the department said, “The review is ongoing. Will let you know when we have something to share.”



      DMV = California Department of Motor Vehicles
      Tesla | 714,99 $
      2 Antworten?Die Baumansicht ist in diesem Thread nicht möglich.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 14.07.22 02:06:02
      Beitrag Nr. 8.488 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.976.943 von faultcode am 14.07.22 01:58:58
      https://twitter.com/PlainSite/status/1547335128573026304

      Tags: FSD, Autopilot
      Tesla | 711,12 $
      40 Antworten?Die Baumansicht ist in diesem Thread nicht möglich.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 14.07.22 02:03:09
      Beitrag Nr. 8.487 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.976.943 von faultcode am 14.07.22 01:58:58..und noch einer/eine:

      ...The head of engineering focused on solar and batteries has also left, I am told...
      https://twitter.com/beckpeterson/status/1547342306885369865
      Tesla | 711,12 $

      Trading Spotlight

      Anzeige
      Rallye II. – Neuer Anstoß, News und was die Börsencommunity jetzt nicht verpassen will…mehr zur Aktie »
      Avatar
      schrieb am 14.07.22 01:58:58
      Beitrag Nr. 8.486 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.597.970 von faultcode am 18.05.22 01:16:58
      Goodbye Tesla, Hello FBI + DoJ ?
      Boxing: They Never Come Back

      Andrej Karpathy 📢📢📢


      ...
      https://twitter.com/karpathy/status/1547332300186066944


      Andrej Karpathy: "I have no concrete plans for what’s next" --> ich hätte da schon eine Idee: mit vielen Anwälten reden (müssen)
      Tesla | 711,12 $
      43 Antworten?Die Baumansicht ist in diesem Thread nicht möglich.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 13.07.22 01:19:41
      Beitrag Nr. 8.485 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.968.015 von faultcode am 13.07.22 01:05:04interessanter Kommentar.
      Hier geht es auch indirekt um die Zukunft von Delaware als ein Bundesstaat mir sehr vielen (weltweiten) Firmenregistrierungen und damit auch um eigene wirtschaftliche Interessen langfristig:
      ...

      https://twitter.com/k_salberta/status/1546982874842386432
      Tesla | 699,21 $
      Avatar
      schrieb am 13.07.22 01:05:04
      Beitrag Nr. 8.484 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.967.988 von faultcode am 13.07.22 00:31:55PDF mit der Klage: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22084453-twittermusk…

      62 satte Seiten:


      ...

      Hier wird nichts ausgelassen und so wiedergegeben, wie von Elon Musk auf Twitter hinterlassen:

      Tesla | 699,21 $
      1 Antwort?Die Baumansicht ist in diesem Thread nicht möglich.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 13.07.22 00:31:55
      Beitrag Nr. 8.483 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.964.031 von faultcode am 12.07.22 14:45:14July 12, 2022 at 11:22 PM
      Twitter sues Elon Musk for trying to abandon $44 billion deal
      https://finance.yahoo.com/news/twitter-sues-elon-musk-212228…
      ...
      Twitter (TWTR) has made good on its promise to drag Elon Musk into court and potentially force the Tesla CEO to acquire the social media company, despite Musk saying he is killing the deal.

      On July 12, Twitter filed a lawsuit in Delaware Chancery Court — the country’s preeminent business dispute forum — asking for one of its chancellors to compel Musk to buy the company, as he promised in his April 25 merger agreement. Under the terms of the accord, Musk agreed to purchase the company’s outstanding common stock at $54.20 per share, roughly $44 billion. As of Tuesday, Twitter was trading around $34 a share.

      “Having mounted a public spectacle to put Twitter in play, and having proposed and then signed a seller-friendly merger agreement, Musk apparently believes that he — unlike every other party subject to Delaware contract law — is free to change his mind, trash the company, disrupt its operations, destroy stockholder value, and walk away,” Twitter alleges in the breach-of-contract lawsuit.

      Twitter is asking the court for "swift" action to force Musk to buy Twitter, noting that the CEO's tactics pose the danger of irreparable harm against the social media company and its employees.

      ...
      Tesla | 699,21 $
      2 Antworten?Die Baumansicht ist in diesem Thread nicht möglich.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 12.07.22 15:27:25
      Beitrag Nr. 8.482 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 71.958.961 von faultcode am 11.07.22 20:52:03Matt Levine schrieb oben auch schon darüber:

      That number is now closer to 13%, implying that the banks would take a nine-digit loss just on the $3 billion unsecured bond portion of the financing. I suspect Musk’s banks will be very happy to get out of this deal. (Beitrag Nr. 8.479)



      12.7.
      Musk’s Debt Bankers Would Avoid Steep Losses If Deal Fails
      https://finance.yahoo.com/news/musk-debt-bankers-avoid-steep…
      ...
      Banks are usually upset when large leveraged buyouts fall apart because of the hefty fees they generate. But Elon Musk’s decision to back out of a $44 billion bid for Twitter Inc. may mean dodging steep losses from underwriting the debt.

      Credit markets have tumbled since banks first agreed to raise $13 billion to finance the deal in April. The riskiest piece of the debt package alone would have caused losses of between $150 million and $200 million at current market levels, according to Bloomberg calculations.

      When banks commit buyout debt, they provide temporary financing that’s replaced by high-yield bonds and leveraged loans. They agree to cap the cost of the new debt, which is sold to investors.

      Banks had promised that the riskiest Twitter buyout debt -- $3 billion of unsecured bonds to be rated CCC, the lowest rung of junk -- would cost no more than about 11.75%. That compares to a market average of about 13.6% on comparably-rated bonds, up from 9.9% when the deal was announced, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

      If the debt yields more than 11.75%, banks eat into fees. They would incur outright losses if the rate exceeds 12.125%.

      At a fixed 11.75% coupon, and assuming an eight-year maturity, banks selling the unsecured bonds today would have to offer a discounted price of about 91 cents on the dollar to reach an all-in yield of about 13.6%. That would result in a loss of between $150 million and $200 million, net of underwriting fees banks typically earn for selling unsecured debt.

      The Twitter financing package -- one of the largest in recent memory -- also includes $6.5 billion of leveraged loans and $3 billion of secured junk bonds. Those types of debt have held up better than unsecured bonds -- though the loan market has dropped significantly -- and it’s unclear how much of a loss, if any, banks would take at current market levels.

      Underwriting losses may be at least partly offset for Morgan Stanley, Bank of America Corp., and Barclays Plc, which would be expected to receive fees for providing M&A advisory services to Musk. Four other banks that only provided the debt -- MUFG Bank, Mizuho, BNP Paribas SA, and Societe Generale SA -- risk going deeply into the red if the deal goes ahead.

      Representatives at Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, MUFG, Mizuho, BNP Paribas and Societe Generale declined to comment.

      The entire situation is in flux because Twitter’s board plans to sue to force Musk to complete the acquisition. If that happens and debt markets rally, banks may be able to fund the deal without losses.

      In a letter to Musk on Sunday, Twitter’s lawyers said the billionaire’s purported termination of the merger agreement is “invalid and wrongful” and that equity and debt commitments for the deal remain in effect.

      ...
      Tesla | 703,90 €
      • 1
      • 173
      • 1022
       DurchsuchenBeitrag schreiben


      Investoren beobachten auch:

      WertpapierPerf. %
      +0,09
      -1,19
      +0,26
      -0,13
      -0,32
      -1,13
      -1,50
      -0,88
      +0,98
      -0,30
      ROUNDUP/'WSJ': FBI ermittelt wegen Falschangaben zu Model 3 gegen Tesla