Carl Icahn: Kasse gemacht: Star-Investor stiegt vor Lyft-Börsengang aus (Seite 4) | Diskussion im Forum
eröffnet am 04.04.19 10:50:59 von
neuester Beitrag 14.02.24 15:57:49 von
neuester Beitrag 14.02.24 15:57:49 von
Beiträge: 86
ID: 1.301.322
ID: 1.301.322
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 4.093
Gesamt: 4.093
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: US55087P1049 · WKN: A2PE38
15,114
EUR
-3,62 %
-0,567 EUR
Letzter Kurs 22:47:02 Lang & Schwarz
Neuigkeiten
18.04.24 · Business Wire (engl.)  |
18.03.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
14.03.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
11.03.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
07.03.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
Werte aus der Branche Informationstechnologie
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 0,6006 | +54,79 | |
| 0,6120 | +32,75 | |
| 3,2000 | +23,08 | |
| 1,1500 | +21,69 | |
| 4,1000 | +20,59 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 1,1100 | -34,71 | |
| 2,8000 | -37,78 | |
| 12,300 | -47,21 | |
| 7,0000 | -62,10 | |
| 82,75 | -68,36 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 64.832.866 von faultcode am 20.08.20 22:29:11
--> Grund: https://www.wallstreet-online.de/diskussion/1303614-121-130/…
--> Grund: https://www.wallstreet-online.de/diskussion/1303614-121-130/…
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 64.831.360 von faultcode am 20.08.20 20:47:48daran lag es:
Ein Berufungsgericht im Bundesstaat Kalifornien hatte entschieden, dass Uber und Lyft ihre Fahrer erst einmal nicht - wie zuvor von einem Richter entschieden - rasch als Mitarbeiter statt als unabhängige Unternehmer behandeln müssen.
https://www.finanzen.net/nachricht/aktien/protest-aktien-von…
Ein Berufungsgericht im Bundesstaat Kalifornien hatte entschieden, dass Uber und Lyft ihre Fahrer erst einmal nicht - wie zuvor von einem Richter entschieden - rasch als Mitarbeiter statt als unabhängige Unternehmer behandeln müssen.
https://www.finanzen.net/nachricht/aktien/protest-aktien-von…
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 64.742.680 von faultcode am 12.08.20 23:12:2520.8.
Lyft to suspend rides in California over order to classify drivers as employees
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/lyft-to-suspend-rides-in-c…
...
<auch UBER>
=> aber so was Fundamentales juckt doch heutzutage keine Aktien. Darauf daher mal:
• LYFT: +1.9%
• UBER: +3.9%
=> merke: wo nicht gefahren wird, fallen auch keine Kosten an
Lyft to suspend rides in California over order to classify drivers as employees
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/lyft-to-suspend-rides-in-c…
...
<auch UBER>
=> aber so was Fundamentales juckt doch heutzutage keine Aktien. Darauf daher mal:
• LYFT: +1.9%
• UBER: +3.9%
=> merke: wo nicht gefahren wird, fallen auch keine Kosten an
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 64.719.199 von faultcode am 11.08.20 13:06:20
https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1293643631581188099
https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1293643631581188099
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 64.713.187 von faultcode am 11.08.20 01:39:54Lyft, der lahme Bruder von Uber -- also extra-lahm:
Trading Spotlight
10.8.
Uber and Lyft Ordered to Stop Classifying Drivers as Independent Contractors
https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/uber-and-lyft-ordered-t…
...
Uber and Lyft on Monday were ordered by a state court in California to stop classifying their drivers as independent contractors, and instead to follow the terms of a state law that requires the companies to treat drivers as employees.
Superior Court Judge Ethan Schulman granted a preliminary injunction against further violations of the law, but also issued a 10-day stay of the ruling to given the companies the opportunity to appeal.
Last year, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law a measure passed by the state legislature called AB5 (Assembly Bill 5) that requires companies to pass certain tests before they can treat workers as contractors rather than employees. The law was specifically targeted at “gig” drivers such as those who work for Uber (ticker: UBER) and Lyft (LYFT), the defendants in this case. Uber, Lyft, and the food-delivery company DoorDash are behind Proposition 22, a ballot measure to be considered by California voters in November that would exempt the gig companies from AB5.
The ruling today came in a case filed in May by the city attorneys of Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Francisco on behalf of the state. In his opinion, the judge writes that the government has “amply demonstrated a reasonable probability of prevailing on their claim that Defendants are misclassifying their drivers,” adding that “Defendants contrary arguments lack merit.”
The judge finds that the companies’ “contention that they are not hiring entities within the meaning of the statute cannot be squared with the undisputed reality that they hire and contract with drivers.”
...
Uber and Lyft Ordered to Stop Classifying Drivers as Independent Contractors
https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/uber-and-lyft-ordered-t…
...
Uber and Lyft on Monday were ordered by a state court in California to stop classifying their drivers as independent contractors, and instead to follow the terms of a state law that requires the companies to treat drivers as employees.
Superior Court Judge Ethan Schulman granted a preliminary injunction against further violations of the law, but also issued a 10-day stay of the ruling to given the companies the opportunity to appeal.
Last year, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law a measure passed by the state legislature called AB5 (Assembly Bill 5) that requires companies to pass certain tests before they can treat workers as contractors rather than employees. The law was specifically targeted at “gig” drivers such as those who work for Uber (ticker: UBER) and Lyft (LYFT), the defendants in this case. Uber, Lyft, and the food-delivery company DoorDash are behind Proposition 22, a ballot measure to be considered by California voters in November that would exempt the gig companies from AB5.
The ruling today came in a case filed in May by the city attorneys of Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Francisco on behalf of the state. In his opinion, the judge writes that the government has “amply demonstrated a reasonable probability of prevailing on their claim that Defendants are misclassifying their drivers,” adding that “Defendants contrary arguments lack merit.”
The judge finds that the companies’ “contention that they are not hiring entities within the meaning of the statute cannot be squared with the undisputed reality that they hire and contract with drivers.”
...
Uuupsi - mal ein Unicorn mit guten Zahlen in Zeiten der Corona:
Lyft stock soars as sales near $1 billion despite coronavirus pandemic
Published: May 6, 2020 at 4:59 p.m. ET
Lyft loses nearly $400 million on $955 million in revenue, a much larger sales total than analysts expected after COVID-19 spread
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/lyft-stock-soars-as-sales-…
...
wobei, hier ist Erfolg schon sehr relativ bei: Lyft loses nearly $400 million on $955 million in revenue
Lyft stock soars as sales near $1 billion despite coronavirus pandemic
Published: May 6, 2020 at 4:59 p.m. ET
Lyft loses nearly $400 million on $955 million in revenue, a much larger sales total than analysts expected after COVID-19 spread
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/lyft-stock-soars-as-sales-…
...
wobei, hier ist Erfolg schon sehr relativ bei: Lyft loses nearly $400 million on $955 million in revenue
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 62.299.091 von faultcode am 07.01.20 02:08:31die 2019Q4/Q4-Ergebnisse, und vor allem der ernüchternde Vor-Corona-Ausblick 2020e, kamen seinerzeit schlecht an, und zusammen mit dem allg. Markt-Crash letzter Woche ist die Aktie auf ein Allzeittief (am Do) gefallen:
Die "adjusted" und selbstkreierten Metriken, die positive Fortschritte zeigen sollen, wirken zunehmend kontra-produktiv im derzeitigen Börsenumfeld
Und so bleibt am Ende nur noch eine anhaltende Übernahme-Fantasie.
Die "adjusted" und selbstkreierten Metriken, die positive Fortschritte zeigen sollen, wirken zunehmend kontra-produktiv im derzeitigen Börsenumfeld
Und so bleibt am Ende nur noch eine anhaltende Übernahme-Fantasie.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 61.955.438 von faultcode am 19.11.19 01:10:036.1.
Sexual-assault lawsuits cast shadow on Lyft’s reputation
Women say Lyft hasn’t done enough to protect passengers
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/sexual-assault-lawsuits-ca…
...
For years, Lyft has been the good guy of ride-hailing. In early days, its cars were adorned with whimsical pink mustaches. Its founders talked about improving peoples’ lives by reducing individual car ownership. And while Uber drivers grabbed headlines for assaulting passengers, somehow — despite many drivers working for both companies — Lyft remained unscathed.
That changed when dozens of women filed lawsuits against Lyft in recent months, claiming that they were sexually assaulted by the company’s drivers. The women said Lyft did not do enough to keep them safe, and several said that when they reported the incidents, Lyft did little or nothing to make it right.
“They didn’t even really say sorry at all. They just said, ‘OK, well we’re going to send you your money back,’” said Caroline Miller, 21, who says she was raped by a Lyft driver after a night out celebrating her birthday. “I didn’t even get an email. It was crazy. They kind of just pushed it under the rug, and were like, ‘whatever.’”
Miller is one of 19 women who jointly filed a lawsuit against Lyft in December. They argued Lyft could have done more to protect passengers by requiring in-car video monitoring and conducting fingerprint-based background checks, and they said Lyft does not adequately investigate customer complaints of sexually inappropriate behavior.
...
Die Aktie pendelt zwischen ~USD43 und ~USD46:
Sexual-assault lawsuits cast shadow on Lyft’s reputation
Women say Lyft hasn’t done enough to protect passengers
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/sexual-assault-lawsuits-ca…
...
For years, Lyft has been the good guy of ride-hailing. In early days, its cars were adorned with whimsical pink mustaches. Its founders talked about improving peoples’ lives by reducing individual car ownership. And while Uber drivers grabbed headlines for assaulting passengers, somehow — despite many drivers working for both companies — Lyft remained unscathed.
That changed when dozens of women filed lawsuits against Lyft in recent months, claiming that they were sexually assaulted by the company’s drivers. The women said Lyft did not do enough to keep them safe, and several said that when they reported the incidents, Lyft did little or nothing to make it right.
“They didn’t even really say sorry at all. They just said, ‘OK, well we’re going to send you your money back,’” said Caroline Miller, 21, who says she was raped by a Lyft driver after a night out celebrating her birthday. “I didn’t even get an email. It was crazy. They kind of just pushed it under the rug, and were like, ‘whatever.’”
Miller is one of 19 women who jointly filed a lawsuit against Lyft in December. They argued Lyft could have done more to protect passengers by requiring in-car video monitoring and conducting fingerprint-based background checks, and they said Lyft does not adequately investigate customer complaints of sexually inappropriate behavior.
...
Die Aktie pendelt zwischen ~USD43 und ~USD46:
was meint ihr, lohnt sich langsam ein einstieg?
Durchsuchen
