Abby Cohen und die Goldman Sachs-Mafia - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

[day_sleeper]

aus siliconinvestor.com , vom 7.3.01
Wer noch irgendwelche Illusionen über die großen MarketPlayer ála Goldman Sachs im Allgemeinen und Miss Cohen im Besonderen haben sollte, wird mit dem folgenden Artikel sicher geheilt sein.

Here are excerpts from tonight`s Goran Yordanoff (www.TradingMarkets.com):

At the close yesterday, Lewis Borsellino`s Teachtrade posted that Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch were big S&P futures buyers at the close. I scratched my head and wondered why they would be buying when the Dow and S&P indexes put in such terrible trading sessions and had formed very bearish candlestick formations on their charts. This morning`s events answered my question.
In a blatantly obvious and manipulative move by Goldman Sachs to produce a positive market environment for the two IPOs it is bringing to market this week, Ms. Abby Cohen (The Ghost of Bubblemania Past), GS`s chief market analyst and cheerleader extraordinaire was paraded shamelessly on CNBC once again this morning. Ms. Cohen felt compelled to help us realize that unless we increased our exposure to equities, we were going to miss the boat. I hope all of you read my column from yesterday to recognize what is taking place here.

It seemed like Goldman and pals had to pull out the big guns premarket this morning because yesterday`s close made this market look like McGyver and a case of duct tape couldn`t hold it together.

I found an interesting post on a message board thread by a Mark L. that summarized Ms. Cohen`s track record for the past year:

- On April 6th, she recommended her SUPER SEVEN stocks for the long-term: CSCO, DELL, EMC, FDC, ORCL, PMCS, TER. As of yesterday`s close, that portfolio is down 46.2%. Long-term is right, because that portfolio needs to go up almost 100% to get back to where she recommended them.

- October 3rd, she recommended BEAS, CSCO, EMC, JNPR, NTAP and ORCL. That portfolio is down 60.2%. Oye vey.

- November 27th, she recommended CSCO (she hadn`t had enough), DOX, EMC (she still hadn`t had enough), GLW, ITWO, SLR, SUNW, and VRTS. As of yesterday`s close, that portfolio is down 39.63%.

Now, Ms. Cohen is trying to convince us to buy once again as she is increasing her exposure to equities from 65% to 70%. Hmm... how does the old saying go?... "Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me," I believe.

Very interesting record indeed, wouldn`t you agree? Amazing that she still gets television air time with such a dismal record. Fascinating still, is the fact that Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch could so blatantly front-run Abby`s premarket call this morning which caused an enormous gap up in all indexes. When a layperson tries to front-run, they end up in handcuffs and the judicial system makes `an example` out of them. However, it is perfectly fine for the brokerage houses to do the exact same thing whenever they have the opportunity to. Isn`t it fascinating that the federal government wants to control virtually every aspect of how we act, work, love, and spend our time in private, yet the Wayne Angells and Abby Cohens of the world can commit these acts of fraud without lifting a regulative eyebrow?

In fact, various brokerage houses came out today with lists of stocks we should "BUY NOW." They are telling us we should be buying equities right now because the economic environment will only get better with the Federal Reserve in a rate easing mode and a potential tax cut later this year. Let`s just say I feel a little differently.

Let there be no doubt here, the Titanic is going down but the band is playing as loud as it possibly can.

All week long we have heard portfolio managers and stock gurus tell us how "value is back in vogue" and how you had to buy "old economy" stocks here. However, they failed to specify which sectors they considered to be values. Let`s see, can`t be the healthcare sector because that is trading at historically high multiples... can`t be the retail patch because those are trading at ridiculously high multiples as well. In fact, you cannot find such a sector because such a sector doesn`t exist. As I stated yesterday, the Dow index and the various momentum sectors which have been created within the Dow are now experiencing the same parabolic stock moves and stretched valuations we witnessed in the technology sector when the Nasdaq made its blow-off move to 5100. This time, however, noone is warning us of the danger that potentially lies ahead. Rather, we are being told that the consumer will continue to spend and drive this economy out of this listless period. Is that so?

What probably excaped the headlines late in the day as pure euphoria spread throughout the NYSE was the fact that January consumer credit surged $16.1 billion. A $5.3 billion rise was expected. If you don`t think this is one of the most serious problems in our economy today, please think again. This figure not only shows an absurd level of complacency throughout society but is quite disturbing in the face of negative personal savings figures and down equity markets. As the savings rate continues to reach new record lows, the conspicuous consumer continues to spend with or without cash. Further, the consumer credit year-on-year growth rate has been continually increasing since May, 1998.

The consumer is tapped out. The analysts and brokerage houses who are trying to sell the argument of the American consumer being a soldier who will fight this economy back to the days of tremendous growth we experienced in 1999 and early 2000 are missing one simple fact: The American consumer cannot fight much longer because they are nearly out of bullets.

It is my opinion that the market is being manipulated here to drive the popular indexes higher in an event to suck in as much sideline cash as possible. There is no telling how long this will last but the only thing I do know is you must fade this move.

[Mersey63]

Abby Cohen,Goldman Sachs,Allan Greenspan,Ron Sommer etc..alles klar?

[grove]

@mersey63

nichts klar. Kannst Du die Zusammenhaenge etwas besser erklaeren? Vor allem Greenspan/Sommer.

[Mersey63]

@grove
Was Du nicht weisst, musst Du auch nicht vergessen..sorry

[Singha]

Was soll man da groß sagen, alles Verbrecher halt, eignen sich jedoch vorzüglich als Kontraindikatoren, bin im Oktober selbst auf Abby Cohan reingefallen, hat mich fast ruiniert

[grove]

@mersey63,

schade, ich wollte mich nur belehren lassen was Sommer und Greenspan gemeinsam haben. Und haette es bestimmt auch nicht vergessen.

[moneyfill]

@Mersey63

hab´Dich schon verstanden. Der Schaden was von den Herrschaften verursacht wurde (z.B. falsche Prognosen, mißglücktes Management, etc... ) ist enorm !!

P.S. die Abby Cohen meint vielleicht gut was sie sagt,
allerdings liegt (lag) sie immer FALSCH ! Sie ist (war)
immer optimistisch, wir wissen aber alle, was geschah, wie die Börse sich "entwickelt" hat !!

[OOOOA]

was Sommer und Greenspan gemeinsam haben ?

In Sommer ist Green .

[day_sleeper]

Es geht in dem Artikel auch vor allem darum, dass Goldman Sachs vorgestern zum Marktschluss massig S&P Future Kontrakte gekauft hat und am nächsten Tag, also gestern, sich die Cohen-Schlampe als führende Analystin von Goldman Sachs hinstellt und mit ihren üblichen Tiraden den Markt für unterbewertet erklärt, wohlwissend, dass ihre dämlichen Kommentare immer zu einer kurzfristigen Hype führen. Bei normalen Aktien würde man sowas übles Frontrunning nennen und die SEC würde die Leute in den Knast stecken.

[Mersey63]

@ grove
Ich dachte mir,dass Du das nicht vergessen wuerdest..
@ooooA
..ich kann keine Smileys..