Blagman Media International- BMII - 500 Beiträge pro Seite
eröffnet am 03.02.02 16:52:30 von
neuester Beitrag 22.03.02 18:59:53 von
neuester Beitrag 22.03.02 18:59:53 von
Beiträge: 21
ID: 544.912
ID: 544.912
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 376
Gesamt: 376
Aktive User: 0
Top-Diskussionen
Titel | letzter Beitrag | Aufrufe |
---|---|---|
gestern 21:20 | 6599 | |
vor 1 Stunde | 4839 | |
vor 1 Stunde | 4626 | |
gestern 18:00 | 3197 | |
gestern 22:23 | 2933 | |
vor 1 Stunde | 2814 | |
vor 1 Stunde | 2067 | |
vor 1 Stunde | 1709 |
Meistdiskutierte Wertpapiere
Platz | vorher | Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % | Anzahl | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 1. | 17.737,36 | -0,56 | 198 | |||
2. | 2. | 146,86 | -2,05 | 95 | |||
3. | 7. | 6,6460 | -1,23 | 70 | |||
4. | 5. | 0,1810 | -1,90 | 51 | |||
5. | Neu! | 710,40 | -23,49 | 46 | |||
6. | 8. | 3,7700 | +0,80 | 45 | |||
7. | 17. | 7,2900 | -0,21 | 43 | |||
8. | 4. | 2.390,60 | 0,00 | 41 |
BMII wird in kürze Century Media übernehmen, die einen geschätzten Jahresumsatz von 80 - 100 Mio $ haben. Bmii hat schon im November das entsprechende Filing (SB2) bei der SEC abgegeben. Der Chart liefert im Moment ein desaströses Bild ab, jedoch sollte man sich davon nicht ablenken lassen, ich erinnere dabei an AMJC (von 0,0017 auf 0,015) . Ich hab auch nur auf Short Term Basis rein. Die Aktie hat ist aufgrund des bevorstehenden Abschlußes schon von 0.0012 auf 0.003 geklettert und ist am Freitag wieder auf 0,002 zurückgefallen, was eine super Einstiegssituation ermöglicht! Das ist ein beliebter Trick der MM um Shares kurz vor dem RUN billig einzusacken. Die entsprechende PR zu Century Media wird diese Woche erwartet.
Ich will noch mal betonen dass dies nur ein Tipp von mir ist und ich keinen auffordere diese Aktie zu kaufen. Die entsprechende DD findet ihr bei Ragingbull.
Ich will noch mal betonen dass dies nur ein Tipp von mir ist und ich keinen auffordere diese Aktie zu kaufen. Die entsprechende DD findet ihr bei Ragingbull.
Aktuell bei 0,0025
Bid: 0,002 Ask: 0,0025
Das wären wieder lockere 25% gewesen, wenn bei 0,002 $ eingestiegen wäre . Ich habe meine GTC- Sell order bei o.oo8 $ .
Bid: 0,002 Ask: 0,0025
Das wären wieder lockere 25% gewesen, wenn bei 0,002 $ eingestiegen wäre . Ich habe meine GTC- Sell order bei o.oo8 $ .
NEWS!!!!!!NEWS!!!!!!!NEWS!!!!!!!!!
Friday March 8, 9:01 am Eastern Time
Press Release
SOURCE: Blagman Media International Inc.
Blagman Media International Inc. to Complete Acquisition of Century Media Inc.
Plan Would Combine Century and Blagman to Form Major Direct Response Marketing Enterprise
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 8, 2002--Blagman Media, Inc. (OTC: BMII - news) confirmed that it has signed a definitive merger agreement for the 100% acquisition of Century Media Inc. (www.centurydr.com) -- the formal closing is expected by next week (mid March). Effective immediately Century and Blagman Media will operate as one combined entity. The consolidation of these two major companies will result in a full service integrated direct marketing venture. The combined entity will be named Blagman/Century Media. Combined billing for 2001 was $50 million. Both staffs will be absorbed under the new entity totaling approximately 40 professionals.
Robert Blagman, CEO of BMII stated, ``It has been a `roller coaster` year negotiating this very important acquisition. Our shareholders have been patient and very supportive. We can now move ahead with our business plan of industry consolidation. Due to our pending SB2 filing, BMII has adhered to a regulatory `silent period` for the past 6 months. With the importance and impact of acquiring Century Media Inc., BMII has placed the SB2 on temporary hold to allow for full financial disclosure of the combined entities at the conclusion of our yearly combined audit.``
``Blagman/Century Media is now positioned to achieve the goal we set last year to consolidate strong direct marketing participants into a single enterprise.`` The consolidated advertising and media placements projected for 2002 of Blagman/Century Media entities will reach $65 million with 2003 projections placed at $100 million plus.
Peter Lambert, CFO of Century Media Inc. said, ``We feel quite confident that Blagman Media will continue to set a path of innovation in advertising as Century Media has for the past ten years. Since Robert Blagman and staff have been working with us for many years -- we anticipate an easy and productive transition. Although negotiations lasted longer then anticipated -- the added time has made us more confident of the strength of the combined entity.``
Robert Blagman further stated, ``We are now pursuing additional acquisitions and strategic partnerships within the general advertising community to revolutionize the direction of direct response advertising. Blagman/Century Media is now fully poised to assist all general advertising agencies in the complicated yet revenue rich world of direct marketing.``
Michele Fuchs, Senior Vice President/Media Director Blagman Media, said, ``Our direct interaction with Century over the last months has created an environment for tremendous growth and has already resulted in additional media placements of nearly $20 million in the next two quarters. I have had the opportunity to work with Century`s media department and feel confident that the integration will be seamless and successful.``
The financial aspects of the transaction were not disclosed. BMII confirmed that Century stockholders would receive stock and cash but that BMII was not pursuing any new stock offering to finance the economic requirements of the merger.
Blagman Media International, Inc., a Los Angeles based global direct response marketing and advertising agency, is located at 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1710, Los Angeles, Calif. 90067. (For more information on Century Media Inc., visit their website at: www.centurydr.com ).
The foregoing news release contains forward-looking statements. For this purpose, any statements contained in this news release that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, words such as ``may,`` ``will,`` ``expect,`` ``believe,`` ``anticipate,`` ``estimate,`` ``continue,`` or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of factors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact:
Metromedia Investment Services / PR.
Jesse Boskoff, 212/979-2962
metromediallc@yahoo.com
Friday March 8, 9:01 am Eastern Time
Press Release
SOURCE: Blagman Media International Inc.
Blagman Media International Inc. to Complete Acquisition of Century Media Inc.
Plan Would Combine Century and Blagman to Form Major Direct Response Marketing Enterprise
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 8, 2002--Blagman Media, Inc. (OTC: BMII - news) confirmed that it has signed a definitive merger agreement for the 100% acquisition of Century Media Inc. (www.centurydr.com) -- the formal closing is expected by next week (mid March). Effective immediately Century and Blagman Media will operate as one combined entity. The consolidation of these two major companies will result in a full service integrated direct marketing venture. The combined entity will be named Blagman/Century Media. Combined billing for 2001 was $50 million. Both staffs will be absorbed under the new entity totaling approximately 40 professionals.
Robert Blagman, CEO of BMII stated, ``It has been a `roller coaster` year negotiating this very important acquisition. Our shareholders have been patient and very supportive. We can now move ahead with our business plan of industry consolidation. Due to our pending SB2 filing, BMII has adhered to a regulatory `silent period` for the past 6 months. With the importance and impact of acquiring Century Media Inc., BMII has placed the SB2 on temporary hold to allow for full financial disclosure of the combined entities at the conclusion of our yearly combined audit.``
``Blagman/Century Media is now positioned to achieve the goal we set last year to consolidate strong direct marketing participants into a single enterprise.`` The consolidated advertising and media placements projected for 2002 of Blagman/Century Media entities will reach $65 million with 2003 projections placed at $100 million plus.
Peter Lambert, CFO of Century Media Inc. said, ``We feel quite confident that Blagman Media will continue to set a path of innovation in advertising as Century Media has for the past ten years. Since Robert Blagman and staff have been working with us for many years -- we anticipate an easy and productive transition. Although negotiations lasted longer then anticipated -- the added time has made us more confident of the strength of the combined entity.``
Robert Blagman further stated, ``We are now pursuing additional acquisitions and strategic partnerships within the general advertising community to revolutionize the direction of direct response advertising. Blagman/Century Media is now fully poised to assist all general advertising agencies in the complicated yet revenue rich world of direct marketing.``
Michele Fuchs, Senior Vice President/Media Director Blagman Media, said, ``Our direct interaction with Century over the last months has created an environment for tremendous growth and has already resulted in additional media placements of nearly $20 million in the next two quarters. I have had the opportunity to work with Century`s media department and feel confident that the integration will be seamless and successful.``
The financial aspects of the transaction were not disclosed. BMII confirmed that Century stockholders would receive stock and cash but that BMII was not pursuing any new stock offering to finance the economic requirements of the merger.
Blagman Media International, Inc., a Los Angeles based global direct response marketing and advertising agency, is located at 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1710, Los Angeles, Calif. 90067. (For more information on Century Media Inc., visit their website at: www.centurydr.com ).
The foregoing news release contains forward-looking statements. For this purpose, any statements contained in this news release that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, words such as ``may,`` ``will,`` ``expect,`` ``believe,`` ``anticipate,`` ``estimate,`` ``continue,`` or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of factors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact:
Metromedia Investment Services / PR.
Jesse Boskoff, 212/979-2962
metromediallc@yahoo.com
Wie ist die WKN?
mfg
hbw
mfg
hbw
Hi,
WKN 886196
Kurzfristig interessant!
MfG Alex
WKN 886196
Kurzfristig interessant!
MfG Alex
Die deutsche WKN kenn ich nicht. Aber ich empfehle ich da so schnell wie möglich einzusteigen. Hab übrigens über Web-Street geordert.
*******Aber Vorsich*******
Bei Bmii ist gerade eine Boiler Room Aktion am laufen, d.h. die Aktie wird gepusht und man kann es nicht verhindern.Denke da an die lieben Basher.
CEO Blagman hat angekündigt eigene Aktien zurückzukaufen!!!!!!!
Die Boards bei Yahoo sind auch schon voll mit BMII PUMP und DUMP Messages.
BMII wird sich schon diese Woche in die Reihe von SSPC,CLRI USXP und Co einreihen.
*******Aber Vorsich*******
Bei Bmii ist gerade eine Boiler Room Aktion am laufen, d.h. die Aktie wird gepusht und man kann es nicht verhindern.Denke da an die lieben Basher.
CEO Blagman hat angekündigt eigene Aktien zurückzukaufen!!!!!!!
Die Boards bei Yahoo sind auch schon voll mit BMII PUMP und DUMP Messages.
BMII wird sich schon diese Woche in die Reihe von SSPC,CLRI USXP und Co einreihen.
Hi Leute
wie erwartet wurden gestern Gewinne mitgenommen. Die `förmliche` News bezüglich dem Merger kommt ja noch (mid March). Lohnt sich der Einstieg für ein paar Prozente?
MfG Alex
wie erwartet wurden gestern Gewinne mitgenommen. Die `förmliche` News bezüglich dem Merger kommt ja noch (mid March). Lohnt sich der Einstieg für ein paar Prozente?
MfG Alex
**********Achtung Heute kommen News********
Robert Blagmann hat schon bestätigt!!!
Robert Blagmann hat schon bestätigt!!!
Wie und wo hast Du das gehört?
MfG Alex
MfG Alex
Hi AOest!
Ich stehe im E-Mail Kontakt mit einigen seriösen Quellen in den USA, die beliefern mich manchmal mit einigen Infos zu manch einer Aktie.
Bezüglich BMII sieht es weiter gut aus, sehe sie diese Woche noch über 0.005!!
Ich stehe im E-Mail Kontakt mit einigen seriösen Quellen in den USA, die beliefern mich manchmal mit einigen Infos zu manch einer Aktie.
Bezüglich BMII sieht es weiter gut aus, sehe sie diese Woche noch über 0.005!!
Hi chaxxx,
in rb wird ja mächtig gepusht. die news von heute war ja noch nicht die news der offiziellen Ankündigung des Mergers. Habe sie noch nicht gelesen, nur davon gehört.
Wenn sie kommt dürfte dies eine nSchub geben.
Werde mal schauen und eine Position aufbauen, so um die 0,0035.
Weiter so mit News und Facts.
MfG Alex
in rb wird ja mächtig gepusht. die news von heute war ja noch nicht die news der offiziellen Ankündigung des Mergers. Habe sie noch nicht gelesen, nur davon gehört.
Wenn sie kommt dürfte dies eine nSchub geben.
Werde mal schauen und eine Position aufbauen, so um die 0,0035.
Weiter so mit News und Facts.
MfG Alex
Hi chaxxx,
das mit der News war ja richtig , aber nachdem ich sie mir durchgelesen habe, bin ich der Meinung, dass es sich um eine `fluff press` gehandelt hat. Man hätte sie auch nicht bringen brauchen. Denke der Kurs wird weiter konsolidieren und bei Bekanntgabe des Mergers nochmals nach oben schnellen. Die News soll ja `mid march` erscheinen. Vieleicht heute im laufe der Session oder Anfang nächster Woche, würde auf nächste Woche tippen, am Freitag könnte sonst das Momentum verpuffen. Hier können dann Positionen aufgebaut werden. Glücklicherweise bin ich gestern nicht dazu gekommen zu kaufen, in diesem Fall Glück gehabt.Werde heute reingehen.
Was sagen Deine Informanten?
MfG Alex
das mit der News war ja richtig , aber nachdem ich sie mir durchgelesen habe, bin ich der Meinung, dass es sich um eine `fluff press` gehandelt hat. Man hätte sie auch nicht bringen brauchen. Denke der Kurs wird weiter konsolidieren und bei Bekanntgabe des Mergers nochmals nach oben schnellen. Die News soll ja `mid march` erscheinen. Vieleicht heute im laufe der Session oder Anfang nächster Woche, würde auf nächste Woche tippen, am Freitag könnte sonst das Momentum verpuffen. Hier können dann Positionen aufgebaut werden. Glücklicherweise bin ich gestern nicht dazu gekommen zu kaufen, in diesem Fall Glück gehabt.Werde heute reingehen.
Was sagen Deine Informanten?
MfG Alex
Hi chaxx,
tja nun sind die Basher im RB am Werk. Vermutlich ein gutes Zeichen, wer den Preis niedrig haben will, hat meistens einen Grund dazu!
Die `offizielle News` kommt ja noch.
MfG Alex
tja nun sind die Basher im RB am Werk. Vermutlich ein gutes Zeichen, wer den Preis niedrig haben will, hat meistens einen Grund dazu!
Die `offizielle News` kommt ja noch.
MfG Alex
Hi AOest!
Bezüglich BMII kann ich dir versichern, dass wir noch lange nicht fertig sind. Bei der nächsten News wird auf jeden Fall noch ein Push über 0,005 kommen, aber ich schätze erst nächste Woche !
Wenn der Run nämlich schon vorbei wäre, hätten wir gestern schon Verkäufe unter 0.0023 gesehen. Ich persönlich habe mein Limit bei 0,0057 gesetzt.
Wenn es dich interessiert, könnte ich dich vielleicht über einen potentiellen 100%ler informieren.
MfG,
chaxx999666
Bezüglich BMII kann ich dir versichern, dass wir noch lange nicht fertig sind. Bei der nächsten News wird auf jeden Fall noch ein Push über 0,005 kommen, aber ich schätze erst nächste Woche !
Wenn der Run nämlich schon vorbei wäre, hätten wir gestern schon Verkäufe unter 0.0023 gesehen. Ich persönlich habe mein Limit bei 0,0057 gesetzt.
Wenn es dich interessiert, könnte ich dich vielleicht über einen potentiellen 100%ler informieren.
MfG,
chaxx999666
Hallo chaxx kannst Du mir dies mal erklären?
15 Mar 2002, 07:10 AM EST
Msg. 44548 of 44558
By: data_rancher $$$$$
15 Mar 2002, 06:32 AM EST Msg. 44536 of 44541
I`ve had some very strange e-mail requests.
People have been e-mailing me as to what I think about BMII and certain problems I have addressed. The questions I am getting make me wonder who is truely behind them. But anyways, in the spirit of the 1st amendment, and my personal idol, Thomas Jefferson, here is one of my e-mail responses.
----------------------------------------------
John-
I am glad to help, but do know the information below is a combination of months of interactions between shareholders and BMII’s CEO, Robert Blagman. The information is based on factual information found within BMII’s SEC filings, as well as documented e-mails posted on the Raging Bull message forum. A limited amount is opinion, based on reasonable and basic deductive logic, or other wise general and intelligent common sense!
However, do not misinterpret my research and due diligence as any implication that BMII, Robert Blagman, or anyone else associated with either, is guilty of any criminally malfeasance offense. In my humble opinion, which is based on my own legal knowledge, Robert Blagman is only guilty of manipulating the antiquated SEC and State rules and laws, which govern Blagman Media International. I might add that while this is regrettably sad for all BMII shareholders, it is completely legal. Some might disagree, but, in my opinion, BMII and Robert Blagman have operated both legally and within the scope of the law.
One question for you before I begin, are you in any way directly, indirectly or even loosely associated with BMII, other than as a common or prospective shareholder? You need to disclose so henceforth, and I might add, you do have a legal obligation to disclose so if you are.
Now on to my information:
Up until Tuesday of this week, I was a BMII shareholder and sold my entire position after reading the, IMO, dismal 8-K news, even Robert Blagman stated, “I have the same concerns,” but I’ll get to that later. The 8-K for me, was the straw that broke the proverbial camels back. BMII suffered horrible dilution during the last six months and the 8-K news indicated dilution, which could potentially be almost 200% more than the last time around.
I owned several million shares ranging from well above .02, to as low as .0008 per share. I bought in to quickly, on a whim because of a paid touting service. It was against my better judgment and it was prior to completing my usual due diligence. Hence as the months progressed and the facts became more apparent, I wanted out, but I was stuck. I averaged down huge, never made my opinions and facts hidden on the Raging Bull forum regarding BMII or it’s management, and always stated that given the first opportunity I could break even, if I could “get out of this nightmare” I would. And that is exactly what I did!
As for my information, I am in contact with various BMII shareholders as well as former BMII shareholders via e-mail (just like yourself). We compare thoughts, we share research and we forward e-mails from Robert Blagman to each other, all done in an attempt to fully understand what exactly is going on with our investment and also because of, IMO, poor communication between BMII and their shareholders.
The first thing that contradicts the SEC filings as well as the e-mails sent from Robert Blagman to certain shareholders is this from BMII’s last 10-QSB: "The Company has sought and will continue to pay expenses with stock rather than cash where possible to reduce capital requirement. At September 30, 2001, $670,314 (64%) of the $1,042,959 in total current liabilities was accrued compensation, most of which the Company believes can be paid in stock.”
Yet when directly asked who was selling, he responded with someone named, “Fleet…I am ready to offer a reward for the correct name of the person who is doing this.” This statement was made by Robert Blagman and e-mailed to ront4498, it was posted on Raging Bull (I will provide links), Ron’s Raging Bull alias is “ron4498,” the e-mail was sent on 12/12/2001 at 11:40:44 AM Eastern Standard Time.
Moving on…yet between 10/20/2001 and 12/20/2001, BMII increased their total shares from 394million to 823million, that is almost a 150% increase within a two-month span. But Blagman tells ron4498 on 12/12/2001 that he does not know who is selling, and BMII’s own SEC filings says they will be selling shares to more or less pay their bills and the OS has increased some 450million shares??? What is wrong with this picture??? My information regarding BMII’s outstanding shares comes directly from BMII’s own transfer agent, Signature Stock Transfer, so it appears someone is not being completely honest and Signature has no reason to be dishonest.
Then between 12/20/2001 and 2/4/2002, BMII raised and issued the OS from 823million, to 1.897billion shares as verified once again with Signature Stock Transfer. Finally when Robert Blagman was asked by another shareholder named, “tom,” via e-mail on 3/5/2002, he asked Robert,“is it true bmii now has over 1,800,000,000 shares issued? If so, why?” Robert Blagman responded via e-mail on 3/5/2002 with, “the stock was issued to keep the company in the public business...as a private company we are profitable - the public expenses are overwhelming and can crush any enterprise.”
So Robert Blagman admits the company issued and sold the 1.5billion shares increased between Nov ’01 and Feb ‘02, yet this directly contradicts what Robert Blagman told ront4498 via e-mail in December. Then, Robert does not directly say they (BMII/Robert) “sold” the stock, he does say it was issued to “keep the company in the public business.”
This statement directly implies the sale of stock based on reasonable common sense, because if it were not sold, it could not help BMII stay in the “public business.” So the logical conclusion would be BMII sold 1.5billion shares, but the CEO cleverly tells one shareholder they “issued stock to stay in the public business,” while to another shareholder the CEO says we are “not selling???” Contradictory, you be the judge.
Now regarding contradictory statements with reference to BMII’s SEC statements. In the above quote from Robert Blagman, he states very specifically that, “as a private company we are profitable.” I have every SEC filing from BMII, no place have I ever read that they are profitable, nor have I ever read that BMII is profitable as a private entity, but loses money as a public one. To the contrary, in every quarterly report, BMII has posted constant loses and has never shown a profit what so ever. Not only is Robert Blagman’s statement contradictory to the BMII’s SEC filings, but also it is rather misleading and represents something BMII is not. BMII is not a private company, they are a public corp., and they operate as a public corp., therefore any reference to profitability as a private corp. is contradictory as well as misleading. Once again I might add the said facts are compared to BMII’s own SEC filings, and I have all the e-mails in question logged, saved and printed.
Another confusing issue arose once again from a shareholder named, “tom.” He e-mailed Robert Blagman some questions on 3/12/02, this was part of “tom’s” e-mail, “i have reviewed the 8-K for hours this evening and with all my years of investment experience guiding me, there is no other way then to interpret today`s news as negative.” Robert Blagman responded on 3/12/02, and this is part of Robert’s response, “I thank you for your reply. I actually sent your reply to our financial group in Chicago. I have the same concerns - yet feel we are on the right track...The 8K is a snap shot of where we are today...” So Robert Blagman has, “the same concerns,” yet “feels he is on the right track.” Again, how do you interpret that, he directly contradicts his own SEC 8-K filing regarding implied future dilution from only one day previous??? Or is he partially admitting his business plan is flawed??? Either way, something is definitely amiss.
The last issue actually arose yesterday concerning BMII’s 560million total share increase between 3/11/02 to 3/14/02. BMII increased their total OS from 1.897billion shares, to 2.457billion shares, between said dates. Once again Signature Stock Transfer, BMII’s transfer agent, confirmed OS information. What happened is this; a former shareholder asked Robert Blagman via e-mail, “to explain the 500 million share increase this week,” as well as asked whether NAIB is handling the dilution. Robert Blagman’s response regarding the 8-K shares was rather curious, he stated, “Most of the 3 billion will be restricted...about 97%. NAIB is a company that is second to Ben Ladin..they are parasites that do nothing expect hurt companies for their own benefit.”
Robert’s statement is confusing and contradictory. He states that “about 97%” of the new stock “will be restricted.” So based on Robert’s own “97%” statement, and when applied against BMII’s 3.1billion newly available shares to issue (based on BMII’s own recent SEC 8-K filing), if “97%” was restricted, then that leaves 3% or approximately 93million regular shares to be issued. So how can Signature Stock Transfer show approximately 500million regular shares added between 3/11/02 to 3/14/02, if, as stated by Robert Blagman, “97%” of the 8-K shares are restricted??? In my opinion, as well as the opinions of every other logical person I have spoke with, it is nothing more than a major contradiction.
Further, do not allow anyone to tell you the 8-K shares will not hit the open market or that they are restricted, if history repeats itself they will! The last time BMII under went major dilution, a poster on the Raging Bull forum under the alias “tatehill2000,” posted this, and in my opinion, he did not deliberately try and mislead anyone, as he did not know Robert Blagman’s answer was, IMO, wily. The following is, “tatehill2000,” post from Robert Blagman’s e-mail on 12/17/01 to him: “The 2 bil is Robert Blag...backup plan in case the SB2 fell through...The 2 Bil is staying in his pocket....Hes Emailed me personally....and people close to him...have told me personally....” A few days later I contacted Signature Stock Transfer, and they confirmed the total OS was 822million, with 777million regular or free trading shares. So unless “tatehill2000” completely fabricated the story, which I don’t think happened, someone was not being completely honest, as the OS had already increased nearly 500million shares. Another issue arising from this is the fact that based on “tatehill2000” post, and based on the Transfer agents OS increase figures, had the “SB2 fell through?” If so, why was BMII in a quote, unquote, “regulatory `silent period` for the past 6 months,” if according to “tatehill2000” the selling would not occur only unless the “SB2 fell though?”
All of the issues I have raised are valid concerns, nothing has been fabricated and they are based on legitimate contradictions within months of confusing statements, and in my opinion, they stem not from internet message board posters, but rather from BMII and it’s management.
Good luck and if you do trade BMII, do not get greedy, set your sell price and get in and get out, because, IMO, BMII will retest the lows of last month if not completely shatter them, but it all depends on the dilution, because BMII can not support 5billion shares and hold any kind of positive PPS. Best of luck to you. Data.
Ps…I’ve included links to referenced posts and SEC filings above, I will also post this to the BMII message board on Raging Bull.
15 Mar 2002, 07:10 AM EST
Msg. 44548 of 44558
By: data_rancher $$$$$
15 Mar 2002, 06:32 AM EST Msg. 44536 of 44541
I`ve had some very strange e-mail requests.
People have been e-mailing me as to what I think about BMII and certain problems I have addressed. The questions I am getting make me wonder who is truely behind them. But anyways, in the spirit of the 1st amendment, and my personal idol, Thomas Jefferson, here is one of my e-mail responses.
----------------------------------------------
John-
I am glad to help, but do know the information below is a combination of months of interactions between shareholders and BMII’s CEO, Robert Blagman. The information is based on factual information found within BMII’s SEC filings, as well as documented e-mails posted on the Raging Bull message forum. A limited amount is opinion, based on reasonable and basic deductive logic, or other wise general and intelligent common sense!
However, do not misinterpret my research and due diligence as any implication that BMII, Robert Blagman, or anyone else associated with either, is guilty of any criminally malfeasance offense. In my humble opinion, which is based on my own legal knowledge, Robert Blagman is only guilty of manipulating the antiquated SEC and State rules and laws, which govern Blagman Media International. I might add that while this is regrettably sad for all BMII shareholders, it is completely legal. Some might disagree, but, in my opinion, BMII and Robert Blagman have operated both legally and within the scope of the law.
One question for you before I begin, are you in any way directly, indirectly or even loosely associated with BMII, other than as a common or prospective shareholder? You need to disclose so henceforth, and I might add, you do have a legal obligation to disclose so if you are.
Now on to my information:
Up until Tuesday of this week, I was a BMII shareholder and sold my entire position after reading the, IMO, dismal 8-K news, even Robert Blagman stated, “I have the same concerns,” but I’ll get to that later. The 8-K for me, was the straw that broke the proverbial camels back. BMII suffered horrible dilution during the last six months and the 8-K news indicated dilution, which could potentially be almost 200% more than the last time around.
I owned several million shares ranging from well above .02, to as low as .0008 per share. I bought in to quickly, on a whim because of a paid touting service. It was against my better judgment and it was prior to completing my usual due diligence. Hence as the months progressed and the facts became more apparent, I wanted out, but I was stuck. I averaged down huge, never made my opinions and facts hidden on the Raging Bull forum regarding BMII or it’s management, and always stated that given the first opportunity I could break even, if I could “get out of this nightmare” I would. And that is exactly what I did!
As for my information, I am in contact with various BMII shareholders as well as former BMII shareholders via e-mail (just like yourself). We compare thoughts, we share research and we forward e-mails from Robert Blagman to each other, all done in an attempt to fully understand what exactly is going on with our investment and also because of, IMO, poor communication between BMII and their shareholders.
The first thing that contradicts the SEC filings as well as the e-mails sent from Robert Blagman to certain shareholders is this from BMII’s last 10-QSB: "The Company has sought and will continue to pay expenses with stock rather than cash where possible to reduce capital requirement. At September 30, 2001, $670,314 (64%) of the $1,042,959 in total current liabilities was accrued compensation, most of which the Company believes can be paid in stock.”
Yet when directly asked who was selling, he responded with someone named, “Fleet…I am ready to offer a reward for the correct name of the person who is doing this.” This statement was made by Robert Blagman and e-mailed to ront4498, it was posted on Raging Bull (I will provide links), Ron’s Raging Bull alias is “ron4498,” the e-mail was sent on 12/12/2001 at 11:40:44 AM Eastern Standard Time.
Moving on…yet between 10/20/2001 and 12/20/2001, BMII increased their total shares from 394million to 823million, that is almost a 150% increase within a two-month span. But Blagman tells ron4498 on 12/12/2001 that he does not know who is selling, and BMII’s own SEC filings says they will be selling shares to more or less pay their bills and the OS has increased some 450million shares??? What is wrong with this picture??? My information regarding BMII’s outstanding shares comes directly from BMII’s own transfer agent, Signature Stock Transfer, so it appears someone is not being completely honest and Signature has no reason to be dishonest.
Then between 12/20/2001 and 2/4/2002, BMII raised and issued the OS from 823million, to 1.897billion shares as verified once again with Signature Stock Transfer. Finally when Robert Blagman was asked by another shareholder named, “tom,” via e-mail on 3/5/2002, he asked Robert,“is it true bmii now has over 1,800,000,000 shares issued? If so, why?” Robert Blagman responded via e-mail on 3/5/2002 with, “the stock was issued to keep the company in the public business...as a private company we are profitable - the public expenses are overwhelming and can crush any enterprise.”
So Robert Blagman admits the company issued and sold the 1.5billion shares increased between Nov ’01 and Feb ‘02, yet this directly contradicts what Robert Blagman told ront4498 via e-mail in December. Then, Robert does not directly say they (BMII/Robert) “sold” the stock, he does say it was issued to “keep the company in the public business.”
This statement directly implies the sale of stock based on reasonable common sense, because if it were not sold, it could not help BMII stay in the “public business.” So the logical conclusion would be BMII sold 1.5billion shares, but the CEO cleverly tells one shareholder they “issued stock to stay in the public business,” while to another shareholder the CEO says we are “not selling???” Contradictory, you be the judge.
Now regarding contradictory statements with reference to BMII’s SEC statements. In the above quote from Robert Blagman, he states very specifically that, “as a private company we are profitable.” I have every SEC filing from BMII, no place have I ever read that they are profitable, nor have I ever read that BMII is profitable as a private entity, but loses money as a public one. To the contrary, in every quarterly report, BMII has posted constant loses and has never shown a profit what so ever. Not only is Robert Blagman’s statement contradictory to the BMII’s SEC filings, but also it is rather misleading and represents something BMII is not. BMII is not a private company, they are a public corp., and they operate as a public corp., therefore any reference to profitability as a private corp. is contradictory as well as misleading. Once again I might add the said facts are compared to BMII’s own SEC filings, and I have all the e-mails in question logged, saved and printed.
Another confusing issue arose once again from a shareholder named, “tom.” He e-mailed Robert Blagman some questions on 3/12/02, this was part of “tom’s” e-mail, “i have reviewed the 8-K for hours this evening and with all my years of investment experience guiding me, there is no other way then to interpret today`s news as negative.” Robert Blagman responded on 3/12/02, and this is part of Robert’s response, “I thank you for your reply. I actually sent your reply to our financial group in Chicago. I have the same concerns - yet feel we are on the right track...The 8K is a snap shot of where we are today...” So Robert Blagman has, “the same concerns,” yet “feels he is on the right track.” Again, how do you interpret that, he directly contradicts his own SEC 8-K filing regarding implied future dilution from only one day previous??? Or is he partially admitting his business plan is flawed??? Either way, something is definitely amiss.
The last issue actually arose yesterday concerning BMII’s 560million total share increase between 3/11/02 to 3/14/02. BMII increased their total OS from 1.897billion shares, to 2.457billion shares, between said dates. Once again Signature Stock Transfer, BMII’s transfer agent, confirmed OS information. What happened is this; a former shareholder asked Robert Blagman via e-mail, “to explain the 500 million share increase this week,” as well as asked whether NAIB is handling the dilution. Robert Blagman’s response regarding the 8-K shares was rather curious, he stated, “Most of the 3 billion will be restricted...about 97%. NAIB is a company that is second to Ben Ladin..they are parasites that do nothing expect hurt companies for their own benefit.”
Robert’s statement is confusing and contradictory. He states that “about 97%” of the new stock “will be restricted.” So based on Robert’s own “97%” statement, and when applied against BMII’s 3.1billion newly available shares to issue (based on BMII’s own recent SEC 8-K filing), if “97%” was restricted, then that leaves 3% or approximately 93million regular shares to be issued. So how can Signature Stock Transfer show approximately 500million regular shares added between 3/11/02 to 3/14/02, if, as stated by Robert Blagman, “97%” of the 8-K shares are restricted??? In my opinion, as well as the opinions of every other logical person I have spoke with, it is nothing more than a major contradiction.
Further, do not allow anyone to tell you the 8-K shares will not hit the open market or that they are restricted, if history repeats itself they will! The last time BMII under went major dilution, a poster on the Raging Bull forum under the alias “tatehill2000,” posted this, and in my opinion, he did not deliberately try and mislead anyone, as he did not know Robert Blagman’s answer was, IMO, wily. The following is, “tatehill2000,” post from Robert Blagman’s e-mail on 12/17/01 to him: “The 2 bil is Robert Blag...backup plan in case the SB2 fell through...The 2 Bil is staying in his pocket....Hes Emailed me personally....and people close to him...have told me personally....” A few days later I contacted Signature Stock Transfer, and they confirmed the total OS was 822million, with 777million regular or free trading shares. So unless “tatehill2000” completely fabricated the story, which I don’t think happened, someone was not being completely honest, as the OS had already increased nearly 500million shares. Another issue arising from this is the fact that based on “tatehill2000” post, and based on the Transfer agents OS increase figures, had the “SB2 fell through?” If so, why was BMII in a quote, unquote, “regulatory `silent period` for the past 6 months,” if according to “tatehill2000” the selling would not occur only unless the “SB2 fell though?”
All of the issues I have raised are valid concerns, nothing has been fabricated and they are based on legitimate contradictions within months of confusing statements, and in my opinion, they stem not from internet message board posters, but rather from BMII and it’s management.
Good luck and if you do trade BMII, do not get greedy, set your sell price and get in and get out, because, IMO, BMII will retest the lows of last month if not completely shatter them, but it all depends on the dilution, because BMII can not support 5billion shares and hold any kind of positive PPS. Best of luck to you. Data.
Ps…I’ve included links to referenced posts and SEC filings above, I will also post this to the BMII message board on Raging Bull.
Hi chaxx,
du hast Boardmail!
MfG Alex
du hast Boardmail!
MfG Alex
Tja, der werden wir mal das `rollen` anwenden. denke auch das hier noch ein paar % drinn sind, man muss ja nicht wirklich an die Firma glauben (siehe Posting oben).
MfG Alex
MfG Alex
And up!
Die Spekulationen wollen nicht enden. Das RB rechnet mit einer
News am Mittwoch. Wilde shar price Spekulationen sind die Regel geworden.
Nun ja, wenn eine News kommt wird es sicherlich rauf gehen.
Dann sollte man das Ding verscherbeln, mit einem guten Gewinn. Wer aufpasst kann wohl
150-200% machen IMO.
MfG Alex
News am Mittwoch. Wilde shar price Spekulationen sind die Regel geworden.
Nun ja, wenn eine News kommt wird es sicherlich rauf gehen.
Dann sollte man das Ding verscherbeln, mit einem guten Gewinn. Wer aufpasst kann wohl
150-200% machen IMO.
MfG Alex
heute news was ist drinn??
Blagman Media Finalizes Deal and Acquires Century Media Merger Creates Major Direct Response Marketing Enterprise, Named Blagman-Century Media Inc; Adds $40,000,000 to BMII Revenues
LOS ANGELES, Mar 22, 2002 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Blagman Media, Inc. (OTC:BMII)
confirmed that it has completed its acquisition of Century Media Inc.
(www.centurydr.com) adding approximately $40,000,000 to annual billings.
Combined billings should reach $50,000,000 in 2002 and $100,000,000 in 2003.
Robert Blagman, CEO stated, "I view this acquisition as a turning point for
BMII. In earlier statements I served notice that BMII will do whatever it takes
to become a beacon of change in the advertising industry. With our resources and
strong history of success, the combined Blagman-Century Media will have the
technology and strength to meet the demands of a booming and changing direct
response industry.
"Our combined portfolio of clients places Blagman-Century Media solidly on the
path of industry leadership. I intend to further empower our already strong
staff by adding well-known leaders from the industry. What we have accomplished
to date is a true testament to our resolve and drive for success. Again I thank
our many shareholders that have continued to support us. I am very aware that
being a shareholder of BMII is quite an adventure -- it`s going to get more
exciting as we move further into this decade of change.
"Many dedicated individuals have worked for over two years to accomplish what we
have created today. Blagman-Century Media can now blaze a new path in
advertising as a fully integrated direct marketing agency. The effort that went
into this new approach is a great motivator and certainly an inspiration for all
involved."
He added, "For those of you who know the industry, I intend to bring back the
spirit and drive that Katie Williams created with Williams Media, the
predecessor of Century Media. Williams Media was a true innovator of our modern
industry and I feel that the Williams legacy of over 250 advertising awards,
commendations and huge client success will set a foundation for synergistic
growth.
"As a public company we will now move ahead with our SB2 filling, which was put
on temporary hold to allow for full financial disclosure of the combined
entities. We will also finalize our annual 10K report but expect to request an
extension due to these important company developments."
Both staffs will work together under the Blagman-Century name operating out of
the Santa Monica location; BMII corporate offices will remain in Century City.
The full workforce totals 40 professionals.
The financial aspects of the transaction were not disclosed; BMII confirmed that
Century shareholders received stock and cash and that BMII does not intend to
pursue any new stock offering to finance the economic requirements of the
merger.
Blagman Media International, Inc., a Los Angeles based global direct response
marketing and advertising agency, is located at 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite
1710, Los Angeles, Calif. 90067. (For more information on Century Media Inc.,
visit their website at: www.centurydr.com ).
The foregoing news release contains forward-looking statements. For this
purpose, any statements contained in this news release that are not statements
of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without
limiting the foregoing, words such as "may," "will," "expect," "believe,"
"anticipate," "estimate," "continue," or comparable terminology are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature involve
substantial risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially
depending on a variety of factors.
CONTACT: Metromedia Investment Services / PR.
Jesse Boskoff, 212/979-2962
metromediallc@yahoo.com
URL: http://www.businesswire.com
Today`s News On The Net - Business Wire`s full file on the Internet
with Hyperlinks to your home page.
Copyright (C) 2002 Business Wire. All rights reserved.
KEYWORD: CALIFORNIA
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: ADVERTISING/MARKETING
MERGERS/ACQ
SOURCE:
Blagman
Media,
ich versuch mal zu 0,003 reinzukommen dt. wkn müßte 917714 sein!
MFG Teffie!
Blagman Media Finalizes Deal and Acquires Century Media Merger Creates Major Direct Response Marketing Enterprise, Named Blagman-Century Media Inc; Adds $40,000,000 to BMII Revenues
LOS ANGELES, Mar 22, 2002 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Blagman Media, Inc. (OTC:BMII)
confirmed that it has completed its acquisition of Century Media Inc.
(www.centurydr.com) adding approximately $40,000,000 to annual billings.
Combined billings should reach $50,000,000 in 2002 and $100,000,000 in 2003.
Robert Blagman, CEO stated, "I view this acquisition as a turning point for
BMII. In earlier statements I served notice that BMII will do whatever it takes
to become a beacon of change in the advertising industry. With our resources and
strong history of success, the combined Blagman-Century Media will have the
technology and strength to meet the demands of a booming and changing direct
response industry.
"Our combined portfolio of clients places Blagman-Century Media solidly on the
path of industry leadership. I intend to further empower our already strong
staff by adding well-known leaders from the industry. What we have accomplished
to date is a true testament to our resolve and drive for success. Again I thank
our many shareholders that have continued to support us. I am very aware that
being a shareholder of BMII is quite an adventure -- it`s going to get more
exciting as we move further into this decade of change.
"Many dedicated individuals have worked for over two years to accomplish what we
have created today. Blagman-Century Media can now blaze a new path in
advertising as a fully integrated direct marketing agency. The effort that went
into this new approach is a great motivator and certainly an inspiration for all
involved."
He added, "For those of you who know the industry, I intend to bring back the
spirit and drive that Katie Williams created with Williams Media, the
predecessor of Century Media. Williams Media was a true innovator of our modern
industry and I feel that the Williams legacy of over 250 advertising awards,
commendations and huge client success will set a foundation for synergistic
growth.
"As a public company we will now move ahead with our SB2 filling, which was put
on temporary hold to allow for full financial disclosure of the combined
entities. We will also finalize our annual 10K report but expect to request an
extension due to these important company developments."
Both staffs will work together under the Blagman-Century name operating out of
the Santa Monica location; BMII corporate offices will remain in Century City.
The full workforce totals 40 professionals.
The financial aspects of the transaction were not disclosed; BMII confirmed that
Century shareholders received stock and cash and that BMII does not intend to
pursue any new stock offering to finance the economic requirements of the
merger.
Blagman Media International, Inc., a Los Angeles based global direct response
marketing and advertising agency, is located at 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite
1710, Los Angeles, Calif. 90067. (For more information on Century Media Inc.,
visit their website at: www.centurydr.com ).
The foregoing news release contains forward-looking statements. For this
purpose, any statements contained in this news release that are not statements
of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without
limiting the foregoing, words such as "may," "will," "expect," "believe,"
"anticipate," "estimate," "continue," or comparable terminology are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature involve
substantial risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially
depending on a variety of factors.
CONTACT: Metromedia Investment Services / PR.
Jesse Boskoff, 212/979-2962
metromediallc@yahoo.com
URL: http://www.businesswire.com
Today`s News On The Net - Business Wire`s full file on the Internet
with Hyperlinks to your home page.
Copyright (C) 2002 Business Wire. All rights reserved.
KEYWORD: CALIFORNIA
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: ADVERTISING/MARKETING
MERGERS/ACQ
SOURCE:
Blagman
Media,
ich versuch mal zu 0,003 reinzukommen dt. wkn müßte 917714 sein!
MFG Teffie!
@all,
das war wohl nichts man gut das ich keine shares bekommen habe order auch gelöscht!
MFG Teffie!
das war wohl nichts man gut das ich keine shares bekommen habe order auch gelöscht!
MFG Teffie!
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie eine neue Diskussion.
Meistdiskutiert
Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
---|---|---|
198 | ||
95 | ||
70 | ||
51 | ||
46 | ||
45 | ||
43 | ||
41 | ||
34 | ||
27 |
Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
---|---|---|
23 | ||
21 | ||
20 | ||
19 | ||
19 | ||
19 | ||
19 | ||
18 | ||
17 | ||
17 |