checkAd

    CMGI - @Ventures Plays It California Cool - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

    eröffnet am 16.02.00 17:51:48 von
    neuester Beitrag 18.02.00 12:37:53 von
    Beiträge: 4
    ID: 64.932
    Aufrufe heute: 0
    Gesamt: 299
    Aktive User: 0


     Durchsuchen

    Begriffe und/oder Benutzer

     

    Top-Postings

     Ja Nein
      Avatar
      schrieb am 16.02.00 17:51:48
      Beitrag Nr. 1 ()
      @Ventures Plays It California Cool
      By Tish Williams
      Senior Writer
      2/15/00 9:17 PM ET

      Welcome to the eye of the hype hurricane.

      First and foremost among Internet incubators, CMGI (CMGI:Nasdaq - news) is furiously scrambling to stay atop the heap. But standing in the middle of it all -- though firmly out of the media glare -- Peter Mills is a picture of calm. Mills guides the hype-tossed fate of @Ventures, the $2.28 billion venture capital arm of Wall Street phenomenon CMGI.

      Mills, managing partner at CMGI, is working tirelessly on two new billion-dollar venture capital funds, one solely for business-to-business e-commerce and one focused on Internet infrastructure companies. He also is fanning away the choking buzz cloud created by CMGI CEO David Wetherell`s hints in December that @Ventures would go public "sooner rather than later."

      Mills is fighting to keep his adopted California cool.

      "I`m just a farmer," Mills chuckles after another helping of deadpan silence. Go ahead, play coy with us.

      You may be familiar with CMGI`s standard practice of buying or incubating entire Internet companies such as Engage Technologies (ENGA:Nasdaq - news), recently acquired AdForce and soon-to-be-public AltaVista. @Ventures, on the other hand, nurtures less-than-50% stakes in private companies. It has invested in more than 40 companies since 1995 through five funds, with another $1 billion general Internet fund soon to come. Six of those companies have gone public, including Chemdex (CMDX:Nasdaq - news), MotherNature.com (MTHR:Nasdaq - news), Critical Path (CPTH:Nasdaq - news), Lycos (LCOS:Nasdaq - news), Silknet (SILK:Nasdaq - news) (which Kana Communications (KANA:Nasdaq - news) is acquiring) and Vicinity (VCNT:Nasdaq - news), which went public Feb. 9.

      But what would be the point in taking @Ventures public?



      First of all, @Ventures might suck a little hype-driven valuation inflation out of gassed-up CMGI competitor Internet Capital Group (ICGE:Nasdaq - news). Announced Nov. 24, @Ventures` narrowly focused business-to-business fund looks like a direct challenge to ICG, whose shares have soared fivefold since its early August 1999 IPO. @Ventures has steadily built up a stable of "vertical marketplaces" -- business-to-business e-commerce sites where companies can conduct their back-end grocery (FoodBuy.com) or life-sciences (Chemdex) business -- as well as several sites to streamline the business purchasing process. The latter includes BizBuyer.com and VStore.com.

      Second, an IPO would rake in even more cash fuel for the CMGI machine. All this Wetherell-stirred-up speculation may be a wee bit distracting for Mills, a man who has honed his laid-back attitude to an art form.

      "You mean my blabbermouth partner?" Mills says with a laugh at the excitement CMGI`s CEO generated. He then tranquilly explains that both he and Wetherell see @Ventures as merely a prelude of things to come. So does that mean an IPO or what? Cough it up! "Beats me. I believe there are different ways that [outside investors] can provide money to VCs, to general partners. We`re going to be out in front of the parade," he says.

      All right, all right. Mills won`t budge. But we`ll be sniffing through his recycling bins for the next six months.

      The best we can figure is that Mills and CMGI haven`t started pitching Wall Street on the idea of a public @Ventures. Yet. "I`m not sure it could be done, structurally," says Steven Frankel of Boston-based brokerage Adams Harkness & Hill, speculating on the short-term likelihood of an IPO. He thinks the current fund setup doesn`t have public markets in mind. "You could form a new fund with the structure to be spun out. But the `carry` interest is already divided up. There isn`t a slice of the pie to give away," Frankel explains. For the reader without an address on Sand Hill Road, the carry is the venture capital equivalent of a commission, but it includes cash and stock in the funds` investments.

      Not that the Street lacks confidence in CMGI`s ability to execute on its loftiest of goals. "They are almost unmatched among investors," says Net-sector analyst Phil Leigh of St. Petersburg, Fla.-based brokerage Raymond James. "Wetherell and Mills have had great success in the anticipation of mutations and changes on the Internet." (Adams Harkness rates CMGI a strong buy, while Raymond James gives a milder accumulate rating. Neither has underwriting entanglements with CMGI.)

      For the moment, the only sure thing is that @Ventures will continue to press forward with CMGI`s "labor-intensive, hands-on and engaged" investment style. @Ventures believes in sharing experiences and contacts among its portfolio companies. That`s the goal of most venture capitalists, of course, but with CMGI that family consists exclusively of Internet companies.

      Despite Mills` past work as the head of trade organizations for chips (Sematech) and computer monitors (the U.S. Display Consortium), @Ventures avoids the tantalizing returns in networking, telecom and semiconductors. In case you doubt @Ventures` self-control in this bull market, Mills says of hardware: "We`re not expert there. There`s no sense in us trying to play in that area. There`s a lot of blood there."

      Instead, Mills mixes CMGI`s Internet-marketing and back-end technology expertise with his personal penchant for straight talk. "I ultimately decided to join Vicinity because Peter was committed to us," says Emerick Wood, who was brought in to spruce up and redirect lagging Vicinity as its CEO in 1997. Mimicking @Ventures` recent shift, Woods moved Vicinity from the business-to-consumer market to businesses selling their wares to other businesses. "He promised, no matter how hard it gets and how tough, CMGI will be there through thick and thin. It took a while to effect the transition from B2C to B2B, but I was never worried that Peter Mills or Dave Wetherell were fully committed to what I was trying to do."

      Straight talk often tops colleagues` lists of Mills` attributes. "He`s completely honest with you about exactly what he`s thinking. You don`t see that a lot," says Mark Fletcher, founder of community email list orchestrator Onelist and now vice president of strategic development at EGroups, similarly focused on managing online communities` missives. "Whether it`s good or bad, you`ll know."

      Vicinity`s Woods agrees: "What you see is what you get. You don`t have to figure out what he`s thinking. And he`s got real operating experience."

      So what is he thinking when it comes to a public version of @Ventures?

      "I actually don`t think it [being a public company] would be much different," Mills says before diffusing the IPO hysteria. "Maybe then I could sit there and watch the stock, smoke cigars and drink brandy."

      Yeah, yeah, Mr. Poker Face. You can`t fend off the hype forever
      Avatar
      schrieb am 16.02.00 20:06:06
      Beitrag Nr. 2 ()
      Hallo Investor 007!!
      Es ist ja schön, dass Du die news von cmgi hier postest
      aber können die interessierten an cmgi nicht selbst bei yahoo
      oder cmgi nachlesen was es neues gibt
      Ich find ´die news- Flut an neuen threats erstickt etwas
      die Diskussion über cmgi
      Mich würd vielmehr interessieren wo Du und andere die Aktie
      sehen, warum diese momentan entgegen an VC Firmen wie Softbank
      und anderen B2B Firmen wie cmrc, ppro etc. so schlecht
      performed etc. und warum die ganzen news nichts für den Kurs
      bringen
      Nichts für ungut Qwax
      Avatar
      schrieb am 18.02.00 00:28:21
      Beitrag Nr. 3 ()
      Hallo Qwax,

      ich glaube, und das ist nur meine persönliche Meinung,
      daß CMGI vermutlich noch in diesem Jahr, spätestens aber
      im nächsten Jahr, eine Marktkapitalisierung vom
      100 Milliarden Dollar erreichen wird.

      Die Newsflut ist in der Fülle der Informationen begründet,
      die es zu berichten gibt. Die Anzahl der Threads wird
      vermutlch in nächster Zeit nicht mehr so stark steigen, da
      ich neue Meldungen zu einem schon begonnenen Thema in
      denselben Thread einstellen werde. Als Beispiel möcht ich
      hier den Thread
      "CMGI - AltaVista debuts multimedia `Search Centers`"
      anführen.
      Dieses Board bietet die Möglichkeit, Nachrichten
      zu einem Thema selbst dann nebeneinander zu stellen, wenn
      die Zeitpunkte der Veröffentlichungen weit auseinander
      liegen. So ist es möglich, wie aus dem angeführten Thread
      sehr schön zu sehen ist, ein Thema über einen längeren
      Zeitraum zu verfolgen.

      mfg
      investor_007
      Avatar
      schrieb am 18.02.00 12:37:53
      Beitrag Nr. 4 ()
      Hallo investor_007
      da hast Du wohl recht - die Aktivitäten von cmgi beeinhalten
      tatsächlich eine hohe news-Flut zumal sie sehr öffentlichkeits-
      wirksam sind.
      Deine Idee mit den (Themen-)threats ist da wohl sehr hilfreich.
      Gruss


      Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben


      Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
      Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie
      hier
      eine neue Diskussion.
      CMGI - @Ventures Plays It California Cool