BBC : BUSH will Verteidigungsausgaben auf unvorstellbare 500 MRD US $ ausweiten ! - 500 Beiträge pro Seite
eröffnet am 03.02.03 18:17:29 von
neuester Beitrag 04.02.03 19:47:43 von
neuester Beitrag 04.02.03 19:47:43 von
Beiträge: 7
ID: 691.282
ID: 691.282
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 215
Gesamt: 215
Aktive User: 0
Top-Diskussionen
| Titel | letzter Beitrag | Aufrufe |
|---|---|---|
| vor 54 Minuten | 4874 | |
| vor 1 Stunde | 3090 | |
| vor 1 Stunde | 1836 | |
| vor 43 Minuten | 1747 | |
| heute 09:10 | 1505 | |
| vor 1 Stunde | 1499 | |
| gestern 12:15 | 1288 | |
| heute 09:49 | 1236 |
Meistdiskutierte Wertpapiere
| Platz | vorher | Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % | Anzahl | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 1. | 17.970,90 | -0,65 | 220 | |||
| 2. | 3. | 151,68 | +0,08 | 112 | |||
| 3. | 2. | 9,6300 | -0,16 | 108 | |||
| 4. | 4. | 0,1855 | -4,38 | 76 | |||
| 5. | 13. | 399,80 | -13,38 | 44 | |||
| 6. | 34. | 0,6000 | -57,14 | 43 | |||
| 7. | 6. | 0,0211 | -32,59 | 39 | |||
| 8. | 5. | 6,7800 | +0,53 | 35 |
Feedback
Das ist mehr als der Bundeshaushalt Deutschlands ! 
Monday, 3 February, 2003, 14:10 GMT
Bush plans huge military boost
Bush wants to transform the military
George W Bush is to propose increasing US defence spending to almost $500bn a year by the end of the decade.
In his proposed 2004 budget - which is being released on Monday - Mr Bush will ask for an additional $15bn for the military, an increase of just over 4%.
US ECONOMIC GROWTH FORECASTS
2003: 2.9%
2004: 3.6%
2005: 3.5%
2006: 3.3%
2007: 3.2%
2008: 3.1%
Source: US Government
The budget will also include a $300bn deficit - a record in dollar terms but not when expressed as a percentage of gross domestic product.
The budget does not include any funds for a possible war with Iraq.
Analysts say Mr Bush will have a fight on his hands getting the budget through Congress - which has still not approved his 2003 budget.
The US 2003 fiscal year began four months ago.
Mr Bush is proposing a deficit
The Pentagon says next year`s budget is the first to reflect the department`s goal of transforming the military while also prosecuting Washington`s so-called war on terrorism.
But some critics are already saying that even the amount Mr Bush is proposing - which works out to about $45m per hour next year - will not be enough.
Homeland security
Other sceptics argue that the Bush budget short-changes the new Department of Homeland Security, which is slated to get about $36bn, plus several billion from the Pentagon.
At least two of Mr Bush`s Democratic challengers for the White House - Senators Joe Lieberman and John Edwards - have said they will make an issue of homeland security spending.
The proposed 2004 defence budget harks back to Cold War era spending levels - but even so, does not include any new funds for a possible war with Iraq.
This budget could be set aside completely in a few days
Unnamed Republican Senate aide
White House budget director Mitch Daniels told the Washington Post that the administration would ask Congress for extra money in case of war in the Gulf.
"I have no doubt that Congress would react very quickly," he told the newspaper.
Despite Mr Daniels`s sanguine attitude, an unnamed Republican Senate aide said a war with Iraq would force the White House to start all over again with the budget.
"This budget could be set aside completely in a few days," the aide told the newspaper.
Leading spender
Defence spending accounts for about 13.5% of the proposed budget. The US spends about as much on defence as the next 20 leading countries combined.
Mr Rumsfeld is an architect of the transformation
Mr Bush is also calling for big percentage increases in spending for education, homeland security and veterans.
Critics say other programmes will have to grow more slowly or even face budget cuts, especially given Mr Bush`s call for $670bn tax cut over 10 years.
The proposed $300bn deficit breaks a record of $290bn set by the current president`s father in 1992.
The White House says the 1992 budget deficit amounted to about 6% of GDP, while the proposed 2004 deficit would be about half that.
Defenders of the budget also say deficit spending will help the sluggish US economy.
Warum rüstet man auf ? Na klar für den KRIEG !
Wer stoppt diesen Irren ?
Monday, 3 February, 2003, 14:10 GMT
Bush plans huge military boost
Bush wants to transform the military
George W Bush is to propose increasing US defence spending to almost $500bn a year by the end of the decade.
In his proposed 2004 budget - which is being released on Monday - Mr Bush will ask for an additional $15bn for the military, an increase of just over 4%.
US ECONOMIC GROWTH FORECASTS
2003: 2.9%
2004: 3.6%
2005: 3.5%
2006: 3.3%
2007: 3.2%
2008: 3.1%
Source: US Government
The budget will also include a $300bn deficit - a record in dollar terms but not when expressed as a percentage of gross domestic product.
The budget does not include any funds for a possible war with Iraq.
Analysts say Mr Bush will have a fight on his hands getting the budget through Congress - which has still not approved his 2003 budget.
The US 2003 fiscal year began four months ago.
Mr Bush is proposing a deficit
The Pentagon says next year`s budget is the first to reflect the department`s goal of transforming the military while also prosecuting Washington`s so-called war on terrorism.
But some critics are already saying that even the amount Mr Bush is proposing - which works out to about $45m per hour next year - will not be enough.
Homeland security
Other sceptics argue that the Bush budget short-changes the new Department of Homeland Security, which is slated to get about $36bn, plus several billion from the Pentagon.
At least two of Mr Bush`s Democratic challengers for the White House - Senators Joe Lieberman and John Edwards - have said they will make an issue of homeland security spending.
The proposed 2004 defence budget harks back to Cold War era spending levels - but even so, does not include any new funds for a possible war with Iraq.
This budget could be set aside completely in a few days
Unnamed Republican Senate aide
White House budget director Mitch Daniels told the Washington Post that the administration would ask Congress for extra money in case of war in the Gulf.
"I have no doubt that Congress would react very quickly," he told the newspaper.
Despite Mr Daniels`s sanguine attitude, an unnamed Republican Senate aide said a war with Iraq would force the White House to start all over again with the budget.
"This budget could be set aside completely in a few days," the aide told the newspaper.
Leading spender
Defence spending accounts for about 13.5% of the proposed budget. The US spends about as much on defence as the next 20 leading countries combined.
Mr Rumsfeld is an architect of the transformation
Mr Bush is also calling for big percentage increases in spending for education, homeland security and veterans.
Critics say other programmes will have to grow more slowly or even face budget cuts, especially given Mr Bush`s call for $670bn tax cut over 10 years.
The proposed $300bn deficit breaks a record of $290bn set by the current president`s father in 1992.
The White House says the 1992 budget deficit amounted to about 6% of GDP, while the proposed 2004 deficit would be about half that.
Defenders of the budget also say deficit spending will help the sluggish US economy.
Warum rüstet man auf ? Na klar für den KRIEG !
Wer stoppt diesen Irren ?
und Blair bringt allen Ernstes eine Atombombenabwurf ins Spiel.
die sind wahnsinnig!
und das ist keine scherzhafter Ausdruck.
Bei Blair wundert man sich nicht.
Er ist ja als bekennender Christ ins politische Amt getreten.
Deswegen hat er auch keine Hemmungen, einen Krieg zu führen.
ich dachte, da steht geschrieben: du sollst nicht töten
die sind wahnsinnig!
und das ist keine scherzhafter Ausdruck.
Bei Blair wundert man sich nicht.
Er ist ja als bekennender Christ ins politische Amt getreten.
Deswegen hat er auch keine Hemmungen, einen Krieg zu führen.
ich dachte, da steht geschrieben: du sollst nicht töten
500 Milliarden Dollar ? Ein Klacks. An den amerikansichen Börsen gingen seit März 2000 bereits 3500 (Dreitausendfünfhundert) Milliarden Dollar verloren.
@Boardlilo
... es steht geschrieben: Du sollst nicht MORDEN!
Das Töten bei einer humaniären Aktion durch das
Zünden einer Atombombe im Zentrum des Bösen fällt
für christliche Fundamentalisten nicht unter dieses
Gebot.
Bei einem Kreuzzug fallen halt Spähne und bei einem
modernen Kreuzzug bestehen diese halt aus Uran.
Ausserdem wird beim Abwurf einer Atombombe gleich eine
weitere Massenvernichtungswaffe zerstört.
Gruß,
CAH
... es steht geschrieben: Du sollst nicht MORDEN!
Das Töten bei einer humaniären Aktion durch das
Zünden einer Atombombe im Zentrum des Bösen fällt
für christliche Fundamentalisten nicht unter dieses
Gebot.
Bei einem Kreuzzug fallen halt Spähne und bei einem
modernen Kreuzzug bestehen diese halt aus Uran.
Ausserdem wird beim Abwurf einer Atombombe gleich eine
weitere Massenvernichtungswaffe zerstört.
Gruß,
CAH
Trading Spotlight
Und damit das Haushaltsdefizit in Höhen hebt , die selbst die US Wirtschaft nicht mehr stemmen kann !
Japan lässt grüssen 
Japan lässt grüssen
Kontron kaufen!!!!
Seht mal auf die Homepage!
Kastor
Seht mal auf die Homepage!
Kastor
DurchsuchenBeitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie eine neue Diskussion.
Meistdiskutiert
| Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
|---|---|---|
| 224 | ||
| 136 | ||
| 117 | ||
| 76 | ||
| 43 | ||
| 37 | ||
| 37 | ||
| 34 | ||
| 31 | ||
| 30 |
| Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
|---|---|---|
| 29 | ||
| 25 | ||
| 25 | ||
| 23 | ||
| 22 | ||
| 21 | ||
| 21 | ||
| 20 | ||
| 20 | ||
| 19 |
