checkAd

    Der Guardian berichtet ziemlich positiv über diese russischen Geheimdienstberichte. - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

    eröffnet am 08.04.03 22:19:13 von
    neuester Beitrag 09.04.03 01:29:15 von
    Beiträge: 6
    ID: 718.558
    Aufrufe heute: 0
    Gesamt: 324
    Aktive User: 0


     Durchsuchen

    Begriffe und/oder Benutzer

     

    Top-Postings

     Ja Nein
      Avatar
      schrieb am 08.04.03 22:19:13
      Beitrag Nr. 1 ()
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,931084,00.html

      leider habens die USA geschafft, auch diese Quelle zu killen.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 09.04.03 00:03:13
      Beitrag Nr. 2 ()
      warum? geht doch noch http://www.iraqwar.ru/?userlang=en
      Avatar
      schrieb am 09.04.03 00:36:44
      Beitrag Nr. 3 ()
      Die Russen haben sich abgemeldet. Der letzte Bericht kam heute morgen.

      RAMZAJ DISCONTINUES OPERATION
      08.04.2003 [18:46]


      Events of the last 2 days have made further work of Ramzaj group in its current format impossible.

      With the embassy personnel and journalists having left Iraq and most of Iraqi information services evacuated from Baghdad, analysis of the situation in Baghdad and Iraq as a whole becomes ineffective.
      The quickly changing course of street fights leaves any informational updates far behind. Direct TV broadcasts are far more evident than any analytics.
      At the same time, we do not have the right to reveal classified, “top secret” information.
      Apart from that, our actions meet increasing opposition from the official quarts and in fact are turning into confrontation the outcome of which is not difficult to forecast.
      Therefore we have to discontinue our work and thank everybody for taking part in the project.


      http://www.iraqwar.ru/iraq-read_article.php?articleId=2238&l…

      Für alle die wissen wollten, wer dahinter stand ein Bericht des Guardian

      John Sutherland

      There is really on one source of reliable information on this war - and it`s coming from Russian spies

      Monday April 7, 2003
      The Guardian

      Every day, as the war rages, there are winners and losers. Not just on the battlefield, but in the stock market. The indexes and the exchange rates swing wildly as euphoric Pentagon briefings ("Basra is Ours!", "Victory in Days!") turn sour.
      The Dow Jones is 200 up on today`s headlines, 200 down on tomorrow`s. Currencies soar and crash with every Qatar press briefing. Truth is not the first casualty of current war reporting, it`s the daily casualty. Place your stock-market bets according to CNN and you`ll be broke in a week.

      Successful traders nowadays do not rely on hunches. They use the mathematical and computing skills of the best brains they can hire. Nerds rule. They crunch numbers and create dynamic models that allow them to shave tiny profits off the marginal and fleeting fluctuations of stocks and currencies.

      The fluctuations have never been more volatile than in the past couple of weeks. Guess right and get rich. But, as one mathematician trader put it to me: "How can I model madness?" He went on to give the answer.

      You don`t factor news into your model, but intelligence. There is a surfeit of war news, but reliable intelligence is hard to come by. The canny trader in these parlous days has a first port of call - GRU (Glavnoye Razvedyvatelnoye Upravleniye), the espionage arm of the Russian military.

      GRU is the most sophisticated agency of its kind in the world. And, since Glasnost, the most transparent. GRU has thousands of agents worldwide (especially in countries such as Iraq, where Russia has traditional trade links). Intelligence has always been a top priority for Ivan. The number of agents operated by the GRU during the Soviet era was six times the number of agents operated by the KGB.

      Russia, superpower that it was, still has spy satellites, state-of-the-art interception technology and (unlike the CIA) men on the ground. The beauty of GRU is that it does not (like the CIA) report directly to the leadership but to the Russian ministry of defence. In its wisdom, it makes its analyses publicly available. These are digested as daily bulletins on www.iraqwar.ru.

      The Russians have a contrarian view on the current conflict. What was it Kissinger said about the Iran-Iraq war - "Ideally we`d like both sides to lose"? That`s what the Kremlin thinks about Operation Free Iraq.

      From its neutral stance, GRU offers detailed, top-grade, and wholly unspun analysis. The bulletins are in Russian (bilingualism is suddenly in demand on Wall Street). You can get English translations a day later on Venik`s Aviation website (www.aeronautics.ru).

      Excellent as Suzanne Goldenberg`s dispatches and Dan Chung`s pictures are, anyone who wants to know what is really going on at the gates of Baghdad should click on to Venik (it`s a pseudonym) before reading their newspaper. Check it out. GRU has been absolutely right about every pendulum swing in the fighting. It gave, for example, the true picture of the ambiguous on-off "occupation" of Basra as it happened. Traders made a killing using that GRU intelligence intelligently rather than sucking up the generals` lies and politicians` spin.

      On GRU you will find the sobering information that the supply of Tomahawk missiles on US warships is at 25% "criticality" level (the arsenal they have to reserve for the North Koreans). The US can`t bomb smart any more.

      Pity Baghdad

      There are other sources of high-grade intelligence available to the trader wanting to be two days` head-up on the opposition. You can buy bootlegged Chinese intelligence reports in Hong Kong (apparently the Chinese have bought that downed Apache helicopter the Iraqis were dancing on) and Israeli analysis in Tel Aviv.

      But why waste money when the Russians are giving away the best stuff free? Invest intelligently and get rich.



      http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,931084,00.html
      Avatar
      schrieb am 09.04.03 01:03:10
      Beitrag Nr. 4 ()
      Verdammt traurig dass der Dienst eingestellt wurde.
      Wo kann man sich jetzt noch "unabhängig" informieren? Irgendwelche andere Quellen?
      Avatar
      schrieb am 09.04.03 01:13:13
      Beitrag Nr. 5 ()
      CNN oder Fox
      J.

      Trading Spotlight

      Anzeige
      Nurexone Biologic
      0,4200EUR +2,44 %
      Die bessere Technologie im Pennystock-Kleid?!mehr zur Aktie »
      Avatar
      schrieb am 09.04.03 01:29:15
      Beitrag Nr. 6 ()
      Die meinte ich:



      Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben


      Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
      Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie
      hier
      eine neue Diskussion.
      Der Guardian berichtet ziemlich positiv über diese russischen Geheimdienstberichte.