Moderna Receives Refusal-to-File Letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for Its Investigational Seasonal Influenza Vaccine, mRNA-1010
Refusal to review the submission is inconsistent with feedback at pre-Phase 3 and pre-submission consultations; Moderna has requested a Type A meeting to understand the path forwardmRNA-1010 has been submitted and accepted for review in the EU, …
Refusal to review the submission is inconsistent with feedback at pre-Phase 3 and pre-submission consultations; Moderna has requested a Type A meeting to understand the path forward
mRNA-1010 has been submitted and accepted for review in the EU, Canada and Australia
Company does not expect any impact on its 2026 financial guidance
CAMBRIDGE, MA / ACCESS Newswire / February 10, 2026 / Moderna, Inc. (NASDAQ:MRNA) today announced the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) has notified the Company that it will not initiate a review of the biologics license application (BLA) for its investigational influenza vaccine, mRNA-1010, and has issued a Refusal-to-File (RTF) letter. Moderna had exercised a Priority Review Voucher to facilitate a timely review of the application.
CBER's RTF letter, signed by Center Director Vinayak Prasad, MD, MPH, identified the choice of a licensed standard-dose seasonal influenza vaccine comparator as the sole reason for the refusal to initiate the review of Moderna's application. Specifically, the letter cited the lack of an "adequate and well-controlled" study with a comparator arm that "does not reflect the best-available standard of care." Neither the relevant regulation, 21 C.F.R. § 314.126 (Adequate and well-controlled studies), nor the FDA's guidance for industry on seasonal influenza vaccines contain any reference to the use of a comparator reflecting the "best-available standard of care." The letter did not identify any specific safety or efficacy concerns regarding mRNA-1010.
The letter is inconsistent with previous written communications from CBER to Moderna. In April 2024, Moderna submitted the Phase 3 study protocol to CBER for review during a pre-Phase 3 consultation. CBER provided written guidance noting that "while we agree it would be acceptable to use a licensed standard dose influenza vaccine as the comparator in your Phase 3 study, we recommend you use a vaccine preferentially recommended for use in older adults by the ACIP (i.e., Fluzone HD, Fluad or Flublok) for participants >65 years of age in the study. Data on comparative efficacy of your vaccine against an influenza vaccine preferentially recommended for use in the >65 years age group may help inform ACIP's recommendation for the use of your vaccine in the older adult population. If you proceed with using a standard dose influenza vaccine comparator in participants ≥65 years of age, we agree with your plan to include statements in the Informed Consent Form." CBER did not raise any objections or clinical hold comments about the adequacy of the Phase 3 trial after the submission of the protocol in April 2024 or at any time before the initiation of the study in September 2024.

