AARD DEADLINE ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Reminds Aardvark (AARD) Investors of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Deadline on October 13, 2026
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Aardvark To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options
If you purchased or acquired securities in (a) Aardvark common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the Offering Documents (defined below) issued in connection with the Company's initial public offering conducted on or about February 13, 2025 (the "IPO" or "Offering"); and/or (b) Aardvark securities between February 13, 2025 and May 14, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period") and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
[You may also click here for additional information]
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - September 8, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. ("Aardvark" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: AARD) and reminds investors of the October 13, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that the Offering Documents were negligently prepared and, as a result, contained untrue statements of material fact or omitted to state other facts necessary to make the statements made not misleading and were not prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations governing their preparation. Additionally, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, the Offering Documents and Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) ARD-101 was less safe than Defendants had led investors to believe; (2) accordingly, ARD-101's clinical, regulatory, and commercial prospects were overstated; and (3) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

