[posting]61513115[/posting]
Zitat von faultcode: ...wenn das aber so ist (was ja sein kann), dann lässt das möglicherweise auf eine Richtungsentscheidung in der weiteren AP-Entwicklung schließen, nachdem wohl zunehmend (intern) klarer wird, daß mit der jetzigen Konzeption der Tesla-Autopilot nicht alle angestrebten Ziele in überschaubarer Zeit erfüllen kann...
-->
17.9.
Tesla Firmware Version 10 - Road Test (w/ bookmarks)
=>
--> dazu Fred Lambert: https://electrek.co/2019/09/19/tesla-autopilot-v10-commute-w…
=>
...
Electrek’s Take
This is without a doubt an impressive improvement. There are some really good auto lane changes without confirmation in there and with somewhat heavy traffic.
Autopilot also handled the interchanges fairly well.
However, I’d be careful calling this “level 3” autonomous driving (~) just yet. There’s some debate on the interpretation of level 3, but it is generally accepted that it’s a completely autonomous system (~) with the driver as a backup, ready to take control within a reasonable time if asked to do so by the system.
If not asked, then the driver doesn’t really need to be paying attention. (~)
Therefore, as long as the system does ask the driver to pay attention, like it is the case with Autopilot (if you don’t have a weight on the wheel), it can’t really be considered a level 3 autonomous system.
Tesla would have to be OK with removing a lot of the Autopilot nag and telling drivers that they don’t have to pay attention unless when asked to.
We are not quite there yet, but we are seeing some encouraging improvements.
--> da hoffe ich doch, daß eines Tages Fred Lambert in den USA mit einer Klage konfrontiert wird
__
(~) auf diesen Bullshit wird man vielleicht noch zurückkommen:
