125 0 Kommentare ISS and Glass Lewis Recommend Forte Biosciences Stockholders Vote FOR Boardroom Change at the Company’s Upcoming Annual Meeting

Camac Partners, LLC (“Camac”) and ATG Capital Management, LLC (“ATG”) (together with the other participants in their solicitation, the “Concerned Stockholders,” the “Group” or “we”), which collectively own approximately 8.5% of the outstanding common stock of Forte Biosciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: FBRX) (“Forte” or the “Company”), today announced that leading independent proxy advisory firms Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”) and Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC (“Glass Lewis”) have recommended stockholders support boardroom change at the Company’s upcoming Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) scheduled for September 19, 2023.

The Group commented:

“We are pleased that both ISS and Glass Lewis have recognized the need for change in Forte’s boardroom and share our grave concerns with the dilutive, anti-stockholder actions taken by the current Board. Under Chairman and CEO Dr. Paul Wagner’s leadership, investors have been repeatedly diluted by capital raises and seen the value of their investment decline by 95% since the Company’s IPO. It is incredibly telling that during a period in which the Board has faced such fierce, widespread rebuke from stockholders on its governance practices, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee did not have a single meeting. In its report, ISS recognized that boardroom change is needed to curb actions that run directly contrary to stockholders’ interests, while Glass Lewis highlighted how our director candidates’ capital allocation and investment expertise can be expected to bring value to the Board, the Company and its stockholders moving forward. Ahead of the upcoming Annual Meeting, we urge our fellow stockholders to vote for both of our independent director candidates – Michael Hacke and Chris McIntyre – who have the experience needed to address gaps in the boardroom and help put Forte back on the right path. If elected, both individuals intend to join the Company’s Board with open minds, advocate for stockholders’ best interests and work with the remaining directors to explore all paths to unlocking stockholder value.”

In its report, Glass Lewis detailed why boardroom change is warranted at Forte and why Messrs. Hacke and McIntyre are the right change agents:¹

“Given the Company’s poor performance, track record of value destructive actions and apparent attempts to entrench incumbent leadership and undermine shareholder rights, we believe the removal of both Management Nominees from the board is warranted.”

“Mr. Wagner, as chairman and CEO of the Company, holds particular responsibility for the Company’s poor performance and failure to address shareholder concerns […] Forte’s financial performance has been extremely poor under the tenures of the Management Nominees since the Company’s initial public listing in 2020.”

“[…] the board has taken numerous steps to entrench the incumbent leadership and to diminish the rights of shareholders […]”

“We agree with the Dissident’s assessment that the Company’s share issuances in mid-2022 and in July 2023 do not appear to have served a clear business need and were dilutive and value destructive for existing shareholders […] we are concerned they appear to be part of an attempt to entrench the incumbent leadership by diluting the interests of critical shareholders ahead of the contested election.”

“Given our views that the Company's shareholder rights plan is not in the best interests of shareholders, we believe it would be reasonable for shareholders to also support both of the shareholder proposals (Proposals 6 and 7) [to amend the bylaws so that shareholder rights plans are not effective unless ratified by shareholders and to terminate the Company’s 2022 shareholder rights agreement.]”

“[…] the Dissident has nominated two candidates who appear to have relevant qualifications that are currently lacking or underrepresented on the Forte board […] The Dissident Nominees would offer investment, capital markets and capital allocation expertise that we expect could be of value to the board and to the Company going forward.”

“We are concerned that the nominating and corporate governance committee did not meet during the last fiscal year […] Here we believe the chair has not performed that responsibility to the satisfaction of shareholders.”

“[…] there is sufficient cause for shareholder concern with the Company’s current strategy to focus on the development of FB-102, which is notably early stage, unproven and speculative, in our view.”

“[…] there is a strong argument to be made in favor of seriously and credibly evaluating a potential liquidation or other alternatives that might allow shareholders to realize [Forte’s] value [...]”