checkAd

     390  0 Kommentare Study Finds Plastics Reduce Environmental Costs by Nearly 4 Times Compared to Alternatives

    WASHINGTON, DC--(Marketwired - Jul 26, 2016) - A new study by Trucost finds the environmental cost of using plastics in consumer goods and packaging is nearly four times less than if plastics were replaced with alternative materials. The study is based on natural capital accounting methods, which measure and value environmental impacts -- such as consumption of water and emissions to air, land and water -- which are not typically factored into traditional financial accounting.

    Previous reports, such as "Valuing Plastics" (2014) by Trucost and "The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the Future of Plastics" (2016) by the World Economic Forum, only examined the environmental costs of using plastics. 

    Anzeige 
    Handeln Sie Ihre Einschätzung zu Procter & Gamble!
    Short
    171,06€
    Basispreis
    0,86
    Ask
    × 14,93
    Hebel
    Long
    153,61€
    Basispreis
    0,89
    Ask
    × 14,93
    Hebel
    Präsentiert von

    Den Basisprospekt sowie die Endgültigen Bedingungen und die Basisinformationsblätter erhalten Sie bei Klick auf das Disclaimer Dokument. Beachten Sie auch die weiteren Hinweise zu dieser Werbung.

    Trucost's latest study, "Plastics and Sustainability: A Valuation of Environmental Benefits, Costs, and Opportunities for Continuous Improvement," builds on earlier research by comparing the environmental costs of using plastics to alternative materials and identifying opportunities to help lower the environmental costs of using plastics in consumer goods and packaging.

    These significant results disrupt a common misperception around plastics. Trucost found that replacing plastics in consumer products and packaging with a mix of alternative materials that provide the same function would increase environmental costs from $139 billion to $533 billion annually. That's because strong, lightweight plastics help us do more with less material, which provides environmental benefits throughout the lifecycle of plastic products and packaging.

    The study also concluded that the environmental costs of alternative materials can be lower per ton of production but are greater in aggregate due to the much larger quantities of material needed to fulfill the same purposes as plastics.

    In addition, the report's authors recommend steps to help further reduce plastics' overall environmental costs, such as by increasing the use of lower-carbon electricity in plastics production, adopting lower-emission transport modes, developing even more efficient plastic packaging, and increasing recycling and energy conversion of post-use plastics to help curb ocean litter and conserve resources.

    "We are very excited to present 'Plastics and Sustainability,' the largest natural capital study ever conducted for the plastics manufacturing sector," said Libby Bernick, senior vice president North America for Trucost. "This report provides the clearest picture to date of the relative costs and benefits of plastics compared to alternative materials as well as important opportunities to enhance the environmental performance of using plastics in consumer goods."

    Seite 1 von 2


    Diskutieren Sie über die enthaltenen Werte



    Verfasst von Marketwired
    Study Finds Plastics Reduce Environmental Costs by Nearly 4 Times Compared to Alternatives WASHINGTON, DC--(Marketwired - Jul 26, 2016) - A new study by Trucost finds the environmental cost of using plastics in consumer goods and packaging is nearly four times less than if plastics were replaced with alternative materials. The study is …

    Schreibe Deinen Kommentar

    Disclaimer