ASQ AUSTRALIAN SILICA QUARTZ steht für Bauxit ( u.a. Aluminium ) ; Silica Quartz ( u.a. Halbleiter ) (Seite 120)
eröffnet am 23.10.07 15:16:22 von
neuester Beitrag 12.05.24 07:09:27 von
neuester Beitrag 12.05.24 07:09:27 von
Beiträge: 1.538
ID: 1.134.315
ID: 1.134.315
Aufrufe heute: 6
Gesamt: 177.935
Gesamt: 177.935
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: AU0000066169 · WKN: A2PV0S · Symbol: 4B4
0,0225
EUR
-4,26 %
-0,0010 EUR
Letzter Kurs 17.05.24 Tradegate
Werte aus der Branche Rohstoffe
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 1,0000 | +809,09 | |
| 725,25 | +18,50 | |
| 0,8750 | +15,89 | |
| 1,7300 | +14,95 | |
| 1,2000 | +13,21 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 27,61 | -6,25 | |
| 3,5600 | -7,53 | |
| 1,7900 | -8,67 | |
| 0,5050 | -10,62 | |
| 0,5550 | -20,71 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 39.743.995 von ralli9999 am 28.06.10 08:47:1060 % Verlust und inzwischen noch höher ist bitter, auch bei mir bin ich inzwischen nach 250 % im plus auch in die Verlustzone gelandet mit 30 %. Das hätte ich nie erwartet. Vor allem, da ja bereits Bauxit nach China geliefert wurde.
Das Management versucht, die shareholder bei der Stange zu halten und vielleicht zu beruhigen. Wir können nur hoffen, daß diese Schwierigkeiten bald behoben werden.
Wenn sich die Situation wieder etwas klärt, kann es ganz plötzlich wieder hoch gehen.
heute scheint Kaufen angesagt in Australien aktuell 7 % aufwärst.
ASX/MEDIA RELEASE DATE 8 JULY 2010
BRL’S UPDATED RESPONSE TO THREATENED LITIGATION
BRL has reviewed in detail the information released by IMF (Australia) Limited (“IMF”) in relation to its announcement that it proposes to fund legal action against the Company by certain current and former shareholders.
BRL intends to keep its shareholders informed of developments in this threatened action, through this page on its website. Interested shareholders should review this page from time to time to obtain updates at www.bauxiteresources.com.au.
Who is IMF?
IMF is a publicly listed litigation funding company. It earns revenue from promoting and funding class actions and other litigation, and taking a share of any judgment if the claims which it funds succeed.
Have legal proceedings been commenced against BRL?
No. IMF has said that it will fund litigation by shareholders only if
IMF does not say when it will decide whether or not to commence the threatened proceedings. It has indicated only that it expects any proceedings to take between 1 year and more than 3 years from their commencement to resolve. the estimated losses by persons who sign up to funding agreements with IMF are sufficient to make the proceedings commercially viable for IMF.
What shareholders are involved?
IMF has not identified which (if any) shareholders or former shareholders consider that they may have claims against BRL.
IMF has indicated that the claim relates to the placement by BRL of 60 million shares on 30 October 2009. That placement was made exclusively with institutional and sophisticated investors. BRL assumes that any claim will be brought by those who acquired shares as a result of that placement and who have a funding agreement with IMF.
What is the amount of the proposed claim?
IMF does not say what the estimated losses are, or how they will be calculated. Nor does it explain what amount will be sufficient for it to elect to proceed to fund the proposed action.
Shareholders should not assume that any claim will seek to recover the total losses incurred on the sale of any BRL shares purchased in the share placement, or the difference between the placement price and the current listed price.
What is BRL alleged to have done?
IMF suggests that any claim for damages will assert misleading conduct by BRL and breaches of its continuous disclosure obligations. BRL maintains that its disclosures were appropriate and kept shareholders properly informed of the company’s progress.
The material provided by IMF is not clear as to what facts will be advanced in any court to seek to prove those claims. The information disclosed by IMF falls well short of allowing shareholders to form a view as to whether BRL has breached any relevant obligations, in what respects, and what losses they are likely to recover if IMF’s allegations succeed.
If proceedings are commenced, IMF will need to be much more precise about detailing its allegations with respect to:
• what information BRL should have disclosed to the market, which it failed to disclose;
• how BRL’s announcements to the market were misleading or deceptive;
• what group of shareholders suffered loss as a consequence of any such breach or failure; and
• what those losses were.
BRL intends to defend any such allegations, and considers that shareholders who purchased shares in the October 2009 placement should be provided with much greater detail by IMF before committing to a funding arrangement which is driven by IMF’s commercial objectives.
BRL considers that many of the allegations asserted by IMF in its “overview” are inaccurate, and themselves provide a misleading impression of BRL’s conduct, and the information available to shareholders about BRL, throughout the relevant period.
BRL will await further clarification of the proposed allegations from IMF or the solicitors engaged on its behalf.
Does BRL accept the IMF allegations about disclosure?
No.
BRL recognises the importance of keeping shareholders informed. It made an average of 2 formal disclosures to the stock exchange per week during 2009 (total 102), it produces extensive quarterly reports, and circulates newsletters to shareholders.
BRL considers that it fully discharged its disclosure obligations to shareholders. It intends to defend any legal action that may be commenced.
Have these claims been made previously to BRL?
IMF did not notify BRL of its intentions nor seek BRL’s response to its concerns prior to publicly announcing that it was proposing to fund legal action against BRL. If it had done so, there would have been an opportunity to productively discuss any issues in dispute and, at the very least, avoid inaccurate assertions being advanced.
Unfortunately, IMF’s announcement of its proposal to fund an action appears to have had a negative impact on shareholder value.
The claims advanced by IMF are strikingly similar in many respects to claims that have been made by certain persons who have been running a campaign against BRL’s mining proposals in Bindoon. Those claims have been the subject of previous allegations to the ASX which BRL understands have been fully investigated.
Has IMF now clarified those allegations?
As is normal for IMF in promoting one of its proposed legal actions, it has generated media interest in the allegations which it makes against BRL. BRL has reviewed this material but has no better sense of what it is accused of doing wrong.
What should shareholders do?
Current and former shareholders may be contacted by IMF to seek to persuade them to sign up to a funding agreement with IMF. BRL urges shareholders and former shareholders to carefully consider the supposed
justification for the proposed claim, and the possible impact upon the value of their shareholding if this threatened action proceeds.
BRL also urges shareholders to obtain independent
What is BRL’s focus? legal advice as to the effect of the proposed IMF funding arrangements and the solicitors’ offer (contained within IMF’s pack) to provide legal services in any legal action.
BRL is confident that it has a sound business model.
It does not intend to be distracted from preparing for the longer term objectives announced to the market, including secondary processing.
Major areas of focus for the coming year will be:
• proving up the resource from BRL’s extensive tenements. The regulatory and mechanistic preparation for this is under way;
• continuing to enhance its right to operate through regulatory approvals and agreements with landowners;
• building on BRL’s information base to make smart decisions for the future, extending to technology for secondary treatment, locational and infrastructure studies, and funding models to optimise and secure long term income.
BRL is conscious of the negative impact that a range of factors have had on shareholder returns, and is committed to restoring shareholder value. Direct shipping of ore has been delayed awaiting environmental approvals, but BRL is working closely with regulators and the communities involved.
BRL considers that it remains well placed to exploit opportunities when the demand/price cycle improves, and the Board and management team are unified in optimising the fundamental strengths of the business.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Das Management versucht, die shareholder bei der Stange zu halten und vielleicht zu beruhigen. Wir können nur hoffen, daß diese Schwierigkeiten bald behoben werden.
Wenn sich die Situation wieder etwas klärt, kann es ganz plötzlich wieder hoch gehen.
heute scheint Kaufen angesagt in Australien aktuell 7 % aufwärst.
ASX/MEDIA RELEASE DATE 8 JULY 2010
BRL’S UPDATED RESPONSE TO THREATENED LITIGATION
BRL has reviewed in detail the information released by IMF (Australia) Limited (“IMF”) in relation to its announcement that it proposes to fund legal action against the Company by certain current and former shareholders.
BRL intends to keep its shareholders informed of developments in this threatened action, through this page on its website. Interested shareholders should review this page from time to time to obtain updates at www.bauxiteresources.com.au.
Who is IMF?
IMF is a publicly listed litigation funding company. It earns revenue from promoting and funding class actions and other litigation, and taking a share of any judgment if the claims which it funds succeed.
Have legal proceedings been commenced against BRL?
No. IMF has said that it will fund litigation by shareholders only if
IMF does not say when it will decide whether or not to commence the threatened proceedings. It has indicated only that it expects any proceedings to take between 1 year and more than 3 years from their commencement to resolve. the estimated losses by persons who sign up to funding agreements with IMF are sufficient to make the proceedings commercially viable for IMF.
What shareholders are involved?
IMF has not identified which (if any) shareholders or former shareholders consider that they may have claims against BRL.
IMF has indicated that the claim relates to the placement by BRL of 60 million shares on 30 October 2009. That placement was made exclusively with institutional and sophisticated investors. BRL assumes that any claim will be brought by those who acquired shares as a result of that placement and who have a funding agreement with IMF.
What is the amount of the proposed claim?
IMF does not say what the estimated losses are, or how they will be calculated. Nor does it explain what amount will be sufficient for it to elect to proceed to fund the proposed action.
Shareholders should not assume that any claim will seek to recover the total losses incurred on the sale of any BRL shares purchased in the share placement, or the difference between the placement price and the current listed price.
What is BRL alleged to have done?
IMF suggests that any claim for damages will assert misleading conduct by BRL and breaches of its continuous disclosure obligations. BRL maintains that its disclosures were appropriate and kept shareholders properly informed of the company’s progress.
The material provided by IMF is not clear as to what facts will be advanced in any court to seek to prove those claims. The information disclosed by IMF falls well short of allowing shareholders to form a view as to whether BRL has breached any relevant obligations, in what respects, and what losses they are likely to recover if IMF’s allegations succeed.
If proceedings are commenced, IMF will need to be much more precise about detailing its allegations with respect to:
• what information BRL should have disclosed to the market, which it failed to disclose;
• how BRL’s announcements to the market were misleading or deceptive;
• what group of shareholders suffered loss as a consequence of any such breach or failure; and
• what those losses were.
BRL intends to defend any such allegations, and considers that shareholders who purchased shares in the October 2009 placement should be provided with much greater detail by IMF before committing to a funding arrangement which is driven by IMF’s commercial objectives.
BRL considers that many of the allegations asserted by IMF in its “overview” are inaccurate, and themselves provide a misleading impression of BRL’s conduct, and the information available to shareholders about BRL, throughout the relevant period.
BRL will await further clarification of the proposed allegations from IMF or the solicitors engaged on its behalf.
Does BRL accept the IMF allegations about disclosure?
No.
BRL recognises the importance of keeping shareholders informed. It made an average of 2 formal disclosures to the stock exchange per week during 2009 (total 102), it produces extensive quarterly reports, and circulates newsletters to shareholders.
BRL considers that it fully discharged its disclosure obligations to shareholders. It intends to defend any legal action that may be commenced.
Have these claims been made previously to BRL?
IMF did not notify BRL of its intentions nor seek BRL’s response to its concerns prior to publicly announcing that it was proposing to fund legal action against BRL. If it had done so, there would have been an opportunity to productively discuss any issues in dispute and, at the very least, avoid inaccurate assertions being advanced.
Unfortunately, IMF’s announcement of its proposal to fund an action appears to have had a negative impact on shareholder value.
The claims advanced by IMF are strikingly similar in many respects to claims that have been made by certain persons who have been running a campaign against BRL’s mining proposals in Bindoon. Those claims have been the subject of previous allegations to the ASX which BRL understands have been fully investigated.
Has IMF now clarified those allegations?
As is normal for IMF in promoting one of its proposed legal actions, it has generated media interest in the allegations which it makes against BRL. BRL has reviewed this material but has no better sense of what it is accused of doing wrong.
What should shareholders do?
Current and former shareholders may be contacted by IMF to seek to persuade them to sign up to a funding agreement with IMF. BRL urges shareholders and former shareholders to carefully consider the supposed
justification for the proposed claim, and the possible impact upon the value of their shareholding if this threatened action proceeds.
BRL also urges shareholders to obtain independent
What is BRL’s focus? legal advice as to the effect of the proposed IMF funding arrangements and the solicitors’ offer (contained within IMF’s pack) to provide legal services in any legal action.
BRL is confident that it has a sound business model.
It does not intend to be distracted from preparing for the longer term objectives announced to the market, including secondary processing.
Major areas of focus for the coming year will be:
• proving up the resource from BRL’s extensive tenements. The regulatory and mechanistic preparation for this is under way;
• continuing to enhance its right to operate through regulatory approvals and agreements with landowners;
• building on BRL’s information base to make smart decisions for the future, extending to technology for secondary treatment, locational and infrastructure studies, and funding models to optimise and secure long term income.
BRL is conscious of the negative impact that a range of factors have had on shareholder returns, and is committed to restoring shareholder value. Direct shipping of ore has been delayed awaiting environmental approvals, but BRL is working closely with regulators and the communities involved.
BRL considers that it remains well placed to exploit opportunities when the demand/price cycle improves, and the Board and management team are unified in optimising the fundamental strengths of the business.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 39.743.757 von jensdab am 28.06.10 02:38:22Enttäuschung wäre ja nicht das schlimmste, könnte sich auch (irgendwann) mal wieder ändern. Aktuell geht es aber um die Frage der Täuschung.
Ob ein Prozeß auf dieser Basis allerdings Erfolg haben könnte, wage ich zu bezweifeln. Ich bin hier vor 2 1/2 Jahren, in der Hoffnung und im Glauben auf eine erfolgreiche Entwicklung und noch weit vor den Chinesen und anderen Investoren, hoch eingestiegen. Aktuell, bei meinem Investment mit über 60% Verlust, schon ziemlich heftig.
Wenn ich irgendwo einsteige, egal mit welcher Summe, ist es mein Risiko und ich muß abwägen auf was ich mich einlasse. Es war und ist keiner gezwungen worden hier einzusteigen. Die Investoren um Petra Capital waren, genau wie ich, wohl eher geblendet und zu gierig auf den vermeintlich "schnellen" Dollar. Momentan dumm gelaufen.
Was soll das BRL-Management denen denn versprochen haben und auf welcher Basis? Nachdem die Chinesen drin waren, das JV unter Dach und Fach war, sah alles gut aus. Die Investoren waren überzeugt ihre Dollars hier gut angelegt zu haben. Mit dem EPA sieht es nun erst einmal nicht so rosig aus. Könnte länger dauern und das investierte anderweitg besser eingesetzt werden. Dumm gelaufen.
Ob ein Prozeß auf dieser Basis allerdings Erfolg haben könnte, wage ich zu bezweifeln. Ich bin hier vor 2 1/2 Jahren, in der Hoffnung und im Glauben auf eine erfolgreiche Entwicklung und noch weit vor den Chinesen und anderen Investoren, hoch eingestiegen. Aktuell, bei meinem Investment mit über 60% Verlust, schon ziemlich heftig.
Wenn ich irgendwo einsteige, egal mit welcher Summe, ist es mein Risiko und ich muß abwägen auf was ich mich einlasse. Es war und ist keiner gezwungen worden hier einzusteigen. Die Investoren um Petra Capital waren, genau wie ich, wohl eher geblendet und zu gierig auf den vermeintlich "schnellen" Dollar. Momentan dumm gelaufen.
Was soll das BRL-Management denen denn versprochen haben und auf welcher Basis? Nachdem die Chinesen drin waren, das JV unter Dach und Fach war, sah alles gut aus. Die Investoren waren überzeugt ihre Dollars hier gut angelegt zu haben. Mit dem EPA sieht es nun erst einmal nicht so rosig aus. Könnte länger dauern und das investierte anderweitg besser eingesetzt werden. Dumm gelaufen.
Nichts als Ärger mit Bauxite Resources zur Zeit. Die negativen Meldungen häufen sich und das schadet dem sowieso schon gebäutelten Kurs. Da sind Übertreibungen - aber so etwas passiert halt an der Börse.
Dabei hat sich an der Qaulität der Liegenschaften nichts geändert.
Hoffentlich kommt bald mal wieder eine Gegenbewegung nach oben. Der Kurspreis ist inszwischen unter den ursprünglichen Ausgabepreis von 20 cent bei Börsenstart gefallen. Wirklich enttäuschend.
BAUXITE RESOURCES LIMITED
ABN 72 119 699 982
Level 2, Building E, The Garden Office Park,
355 Scarborough Beach Road, OSBORNE PARK WA 6017
PO Box 1800, OSBORNE PARK DC WA 6916
Phone: +61 8 9200 6300 Fax: +61 8 9200 6399
www.bauxiteresources.com.au
ASX/MEDIA RELEASE DATE 28 JUNE 2010
IMF PROPOSAL TO FUND ACTION AGAINST BAUXITE RESOURCES LIMITED.
After share trading closed on the afternoon of 25 June 2010, Bauxite Resources Limited (BRL) received facsimile correspondence from litigation funder IMF Australia Ltd (IMF) which indicated that IMF is proposing to fund claims that current or former shareholders may have against BRL. IMF then issued a release to ASX to a similar effect suggesting that the proposed claims relate to a placement of 60 million shares by BRL on or about 30 October 2009.
BRL has not been issued with any formal proceedings, and no threat of litigation has been made directly by current or former shareholders. Neither within nor before the facsimile correspondence had IMF provided BRL with any further detail of the proposal.
BRL had not until late Sunday 27 June obtained a copy of IMF's ‘Bauxite Resources Limited Information Pack'. BRL will immediately study this information, comment further on any proposed legal action, and keep shareholders informed of any developments.
In the meantime the board of BRL recommends shareholders against joining this action until further advice is given. Shareholders are directed to our webpage where we will start to explain the basis of our position, and where we will seek shareholder support. www.bauxiteresources.com.au
http://www.aspectfinancial.com.au/docserver/01074675.pdf?fil…
____________________________" target="_blank" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">http://www.aspectfinancial.com.au/docserver/01074675.pdf?fil…
_________________________________________________________________________________
Dabei hat sich an der Qaulität der Liegenschaften nichts geändert.
Hoffentlich kommt bald mal wieder eine Gegenbewegung nach oben. Der Kurspreis ist inszwischen unter den ursprünglichen Ausgabepreis von 20 cent bei Börsenstart gefallen. Wirklich enttäuschend.
BAUXITE RESOURCES LIMITED
ABN 72 119 699 982
Level 2, Building E, The Garden Office Park,
355 Scarborough Beach Road, OSBORNE PARK WA 6017
PO Box 1800, OSBORNE PARK DC WA 6916
Phone: +61 8 9200 6300 Fax: +61 8 9200 6399
www.bauxiteresources.com.au
ASX/MEDIA RELEASE DATE 28 JUNE 2010
IMF PROPOSAL TO FUND ACTION AGAINST BAUXITE RESOURCES LIMITED.
After share trading closed on the afternoon of 25 June 2010, Bauxite Resources Limited (BRL) received facsimile correspondence from litigation funder IMF Australia Ltd (IMF) which indicated that IMF is proposing to fund claims that current or former shareholders may have against BRL. IMF then issued a release to ASX to a similar effect suggesting that the proposed claims relate to a placement of 60 million shares by BRL on or about 30 October 2009.
BRL has not been issued with any formal proceedings, and no threat of litigation has been made directly by current or former shareholders. Neither within nor before the facsimile correspondence had IMF provided BRL with any further detail of the proposal.
BRL had not until late Sunday 27 June obtained a copy of IMF's ‘Bauxite Resources Limited Information Pack'. BRL will immediately study this information, comment further on any proposed legal action, and keep shareholders informed of any developments.
In the meantime the board of BRL recommends shareholders against joining this action until further advice is given. Shareholders are directed to our webpage where we will start to explain the basis of our position, and where we will seek shareholder support. www.bauxiteresources.com.au
http://www.aspectfinancial.com.au/docserver/01074675.pdf?fil…
____________________________" target="_blank" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">http://www.aspectfinancial.com.au/docserver/01074675.pdf?fil…
_________________________________________________________________________________
Bauxite Resources has gone back to the drawing board over its troubled plans for an expanded mining operation near Bindoon.
The company said it would withdraw its previous application and its appeal against the Environment Protection Authority decision on the level of assessment required for its application to undertake a 1.2 million tonne six-month trial mining operation at Stephens Road.
Instead it would apply to the EPA for a two million tonne per annum operation on private land north of Bindoon.
The decision follows community outrage about the company's original plans.
The company has for several months been allowed to mine small quantities of bauxite at the project under a quarry licence.
Large-scale mining is not permitted in the area under the Shire of Chittering's Town Planning Scheme.
"The board believes this new application to the EPA will enable it to meet its objective of becoming an economically sustainable bauxite mining company able to deliver shareholder value within an achievable timeframe," the company said in a statement.
Bauxite Resources has recommended the new proposal for ongoing mining be assessed at the "high and public level of assessment with maximum transparency".
The company said it would share its plans with the local community before submitting its application to the EPA.
Bauxite Resources is also looking for a new managing director after Dan Tenardi resigned suddenly last month.
Bauxite shares were off 2.5 cents, or 11.11 per cent, to 20 cents at 10.45am.Bauxite Resources has gone back to the drawing board over its troubled plans for an expanded mining operation near Bindoon.
The company said it would withdraw its previous application and its appeal against the Environment Protection Authority decision on the level of assessment required for its application to undertake a 1.2 million tonne six-month trial mining operation at Stephens Road.
Instead it would apply to the EPA for a two million tonne per annum operation on private land north of Bindoon.
The decision follows community outrage about the company's original plans.
The company has for several months been allowed to mine small quantities of bauxite at the project under a quarry licence.
Large-scale mining is not permitted in the area under the Shire of Chittering's Town Planning Scheme.
"The board believes this new application to the EPA will enable it to meet its objective of becoming an economically sustainable bauxite mining company able to deliver shareholder value within an achievable timeframe," the company said in a statement.
Bauxite Resources has recommended the new proposal for ongoing mining be assessed at the "high and public level of assessment with maximum transparency".
The company said it would share its plans with the local community before submitting its application to the EPA.
Bauxite Resources is also looking for a new managing director after Dan Tenardi resigned suddenly last month.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/business/a/-/business/74628…
Bauxite shares were off 2.5 cents, or 11.11 per cent, to 20 cents at 10.45am.
The company said it would withdraw its previous application and its appeal against the Environment Protection Authority decision on the level of assessment required for its application to undertake a 1.2 million tonne six-month trial mining operation at Stephens Road.
Instead it would apply to the EPA for a two million tonne per annum operation on private land north of Bindoon.
The decision follows community outrage about the company's original plans.
The company has for several months been allowed to mine small quantities of bauxite at the project under a quarry licence.
Large-scale mining is not permitted in the area under the Shire of Chittering's Town Planning Scheme.
"The board believes this new application to the EPA will enable it to meet its objective of becoming an economically sustainable bauxite mining company able to deliver shareholder value within an achievable timeframe," the company said in a statement.
Bauxite Resources has recommended the new proposal for ongoing mining be assessed at the "high and public level of assessment with maximum transparency".
The company said it would share its plans with the local community before submitting its application to the EPA.
Bauxite Resources is also looking for a new managing director after Dan Tenardi resigned suddenly last month.
Bauxite shares were off 2.5 cents, or 11.11 per cent, to 20 cents at 10.45am.Bauxite Resources has gone back to the drawing board over its troubled plans for an expanded mining operation near Bindoon.
The company said it would withdraw its previous application and its appeal against the Environment Protection Authority decision on the level of assessment required for its application to undertake a 1.2 million tonne six-month trial mining operation at Stephens Road.
Instead it would apply to the EPA for a two million tonne per annum operation on private land north of Bindoon.
The decision follows community outrage about the company's original plans.
The company has for several months been allowed to mine small quantities of bauxite at the project under a quarry licence.
Large-scale mining is not permitted in the area under the Shire of Chittering's Town Planning Scheme.
"The board believes this new application to the EPA will enable it to meet its objective of becoming an economically sustainable bauxite mining company able to deliver shareholder value within an achievable timeframe," the company said in a statement.
Bauxite Resources has recommended the new proposal for ongoing mining be assessed at the "high and public level of assessment with maximum transparency".
The company said it would share its plans with the local community before submitting its application to the EPA.
Bauxite Resources is also looking for a new managing director after Dan Tenardi resigned suddenly last month.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/business/a/-/business/74628…
Bauxite shares were off 2.5 cents, or 11.11 per cent, to 20 cents at 10.45am.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 39.709.694 von likeshares am 20.06.10 00:16:59Richtig ist, dass BRL über Lizenzen von 24 tqkm verfügt. Ich bezweifele mittlerweile allerdings, dass diese auch gesamt jemals in Produktion gehen werden.
Es war IMO erst einmal BRL\'s Strategie soviele Lizenzen wie möglich zu bekommen. Damit konnte man zuerst die Chinesen \"überzeugen\", glauben machen, alles wäre kein Problem. Die für BRL höchst lukrative, gemeinsame Alumina Refinery, lockte weitere Investoren an. Diese, wohl auch im Glauben an eine rasante BRL-Entwicklung, statteten BRL mit $60 Mio. aus und dürften wohl, wie alle investierten, ernüchtert sein.
Auch bei positiven EPA wird die Frage sein, ob, wo und wann BRL weitere Genehmigungen erhält. Mit weiteren Schwierigkeiten ist zu rechnen. Die meisten tenements liegen in besiedelten Gebieten.
Es wird IMO ein langwierigerer Prozess, als gedacht, bis zur Refinery.
Die $0,24 SP bilden IMO den Boden, außer es kracht demnächst noch richtig. Aber selbst dann muß es nicht mehr tiefer gehen. Nicht mit $60 mio. cash.
Momentan ist die Euphorie und Phantasie IMO erst einmal aus BRL raus. Der SP muss daher auch nicht unbedingt wieder rucki-zucki das ATH sehen. Ich würde mich aber gerne eines besseren belehren lassen und hätte nichts gegen $2 Ende 2011.
Nichts hat sich an Qualität und Quantität geändert. Nur das Umfeld hat sich verschlechtert. Da ist AUS auf einem schlechten Trip. Wenn man dort nicht aufpasst, dann stellen sie sich ganz schnell selbst ins Abseits.
Das zu verhindern und dem entgegen zu wirken, muß nur noch in alle Köpfe, dann klappt's auch mit "the next FMG".
Es war IMO erst einmal BRL\'s Strategie soviele Lizenzen wie möglich zu bekommen. Damit konnte man zuerst die Chinesen \"überzeugen\", glauben machen, alles wäre kein Problem. Die für BRL höchst lukrative, gemeinsame Alumina Refinery, lockte weitere Investoren an. Diese, wohl auch im Glauben an eine rasante BRL-Entwicklung, statteten BRL mit $60 Mio. aus und dürften wohl, wie alle investierten, ernüchtert sein.
Auch bei positiven EPA wird die Frage sein, ob, wo und wann BRL weitere Genehmigungen erhält. Mit weiteren Schwierigkeiten ist zu rechnen. Die meisten tenements liegen in besiedelten Gebieten.
Es wird IMO ein langwierigerer Prozess, als gedacht, bis zur Refinery.
Die $0,24 SP bilden IMO den Boden, außer es kracht demnächst noch richtig. Aber selbst dann muß es nicht mehr tiefer gehen. Nicht mit $60 mio. cash.
Momentan ist die Euphorie und Phantasie IMO erst einmal aus BRL raus. Der SP muss daher auch nicht unbedingt wieder rucki-zucki das ATH sehen. Ich würde mich aber gerne eines besseren belehren lassen und hätte nichts gegen $2 Ende 2011.
Nichts hat sich an Qualität und Quantität geändert. Nur das Umfeld hat sich verschlechtert. Da ist AUS auf einem schlechten Trip. Wenn man dort nicht aufpasst, dann stellen sie sich ganz schnell selbst ins Abseits.
Das zu verhindern und dem entgegen zu wirken, muß nur noch in alle Köpfe, dann klappt's auch mit "the next FMG".
Trading Spotlight
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 39.606.969 von ralli9999 am 31.05.10 09:07:47BRL hat eine Liegenschaft von inzwischen 24000qkm, davon ist erst ein sehr kleiner Teil exploriert. Wenn BRL eine positive EPA erhält, dann macht der Kurs einen Riesensatz. Das ganze könnte aber auch mit der politischen Lage zusammenhängen, so daß die Wahlen im Oktober den Ausschlag geben. Aber auch eine Verhandlung vor einem Schiedsgericht ist anhängig, die schnell zu positiven Ergebnissen führen könnte. Das interessante an BRL ist der Kursanstieg mit Ansage, der hier stattfinden wird. Irgendwo zwischem dem jetzigen Niveau und A$0,10 wird sich der Kurs stabilisieren, weil dann alle verkauft haben. Sieht man sich die Verkäufe an, ist zu sehen dass der Kurs durch geringe Volumen abgesenkt wurde. Es sind also nur wenige Aktien frei auf dem Markt. Es wird bei guten news, die sicher kommen werden, steil bergauf gehen. Wie gesagt mit Ansage, bleibt abzuwarten wann?
Gruß
Gruß
Managing Director (MD) Dan Tenardi tritt zurück!
http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20100531/pdf/31qlp94z8tzxyh.pdf
Da kann man wieder nur spekulieren! IMO wird der MD sicher persönlich Verantwortung für die aktuelle Misere übernehmen und selbst den Hut nehmen. Auch dürfte der interne Druck auf ihn eine Rolle gespielt haben. Vielleicht beeinflußt dieses "Opfer" auch einen positiven EPA-Entscheid.
Mit $0,27 liegt BAU nahe oder bereits unter der MK.
http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20100531/pdf/31qlp94z8tzxyh.pdf
Da kann man wieder nur spekulieren! IMO wird der MD sicher persönlich Verantwortung für die aktuelle Misere übernehmen und selbst den Hut nehmen. Auch dürfte der interne Druck auf ihn eine Rolle gespielt haben. Vielleicht beeinflußt dieses "Opfer" auch einen positiven EPA-Entscheid.
Mit $0,27 liegt BAU nahe oder bereits unter der MK.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 39.596.912 von ralli9999 am 27.05.10 23:50:05Danke Ralli für diese Information.
also abwarten und schauen was an news kommt...
schade, aber vielleicht haben wir Glück und es gibt eine positive Meldung.
Bis zur nächsten News
also abwarten und schauen was an news kommt...
schade, aber vielleicht haben wir Glück und es gibt eine positive Meldung.
Bis zur nächsten News
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 39.594.290 von Mikado84 am 27.05.10 16:56:22Die EPA-Entscheidung wird in Kürze erwartet. Nachdem die vorgesehenen 6 Wochen, zur Untersuchung und Anhörung, vergangen sind, könnten ab der nächsten Woche News anstehen.
Seit Wochen ist es um BAU und im australischen HC-Forum sehr ruhig geworden. Bin gespannt wie die Entscheidung ausfällt. Über einen für BAU negativen Entscheid würde ich mich, auch angesichts der aktuellen australischen \"Minenpolitik\" nicht wundern.
Für BAU und alle investierten wäre es ein herber Schlag, Konsequenzen nicht absehbar. Ob Plan B existiert und wie dieser aussieht, ist nicht bekannt. Alle zukünftigen Aktivitäten seitens BAU werden mit Sicherheit einer intensiven Prüfung unterzogen. Weitere Fehler darf sich das Management nicht mehr leisten.
Sollte die Entscheidung positiv ausfallen, wäre BAU mit einem blauen Auge davon gekommen. In der Zwischenzeit wird das Management hoffentlich nicht untätig geblieben sein. Die chinesischen Partner und Investoren, die sehr viel Geld in diesen Explorer gesteckt haben, erwarten Lösungen.
Weiter zu spekulieren macht keinen Sinn. Alles hängt erst einmal vom Entscheid ab. Schaun mer mal.
Seit Wochen ist es um BAU und im australischen HC-Forum sehr ruhig geworden. Bin gespannt wie die Entscheidung ausfällt. Über einen für BAU negativen Entscheid würde ich mich, auch angesichts der aktuellen australischen \"Minenpolitik\" nicht wundern.
Für BAU und alle investierten wäre es ein herber Schlag, Konsequenzen nicht absehbar. Ob Plan B existiert und wie dieser aussieht, ist nicht bekannt. Alle zukünftigen Aktivitäten seitens BAU werden mit Sicherheit einer intensiven Prüfung unterzogen. Weitere Fehler darf sich das Management nicht mehr leisten.
Sollte die Entscheidung positiv ausfallen, wäre BAU mit einem blauen Auge davon gekommen. In der Zwischenzeit wird das Management hoffentlich nicht untätig geblieben sein. Die chinesischen Partner und Investoren, die sehr viel Geld in diesen Explorer gesteckt haben, erwarten Lösungen.
Weiter zu spekulieren macht keinen Sinn. Alles hängt erst einmal vom Entscheid ab. Schaun mer mal.
hallo,
kann mir vielleicht einer der tiefer im Unternehmen steckt als ich vielleicht sagen ob es irgendwelche news gibt oder ob "die Verweigerung" stillschweigend hingenommen wird?
Würde mich über kurze Infos freuen
Lieben gruß
Mikado84
kann mir vielleicht einer der tiefer im Unternehmen steckt als ich vielleicht sagen ob es irgendwelche news gibt oder ob "die Verweigerung" stillschweigend hingenommen wird?
Würde mich über kurze Infos freuen
Lieben gruß
Mikado84
Durchsuchen
