Bausch Health ehemals VALEANT PHARMA Allergan-Übernahme beflügelt (Seite 325)
eröffnet am 30.04.14 17:10:46 von
neuester Beitrag 10.04.24 21:16:45 von
neuester Beitrag 10.04.24 21:16:45 von
Beiträge: 4.274
ID: 1.193.944
ID: 1.193.944
Aufrufe heute: 6
Gesamt: 390.199
Gesamt: 390.199
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: CA0717341071 · WKN: A2JQ1X · Symbol: BVF
6,0510
EUR
+4,27 %
+0,2480 EUR
Letzter Kurs 31.05.24 Tradegate
Neuigkeiten
Titel |
---|
23.05.24 · Accesswire |
17.05.24 · Accesswire |
15.05.24 · Accesswire |
14.05.24 · Accesswire |
09.05.24 · Accesswire |
Werte aus der Branche Pharmaindustrie
Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
---|---|---|
1,5800 | +54,90 | |
0,7000 | +16,67 | |
1,9380 | +16,33 | |
1,5000 | +16,28 | |
14,390 | +15,12 |
Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
---|---|---|
160,90 | -14,14 | |
16,100 | -15,26 | |
4,0000 | -20,00 | |
0,7500 | -35,34 | |
2,1000 | -47,50 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Aktienrundschau: Valeant - Die beste Turnaroundaktie 2017
http://www.boerse-express.com/cat/pages/2877216/fullstoryAktienrundschau: Valeant - Die beste Turnaroundaktie 2017
Montag, 24. April 2017
Sehr geehrte Investoren,
Valeant Pharmaceuticals ist ein Pharmaunternehmen welches durch das Aufkaufen von Unternehmen wie Medikamenten und anschließenden Preiserhöhungen zu einem globalen Giganten aufgestiegen ist. Seit 2008 wurden 150 Transaktionen im Volumen von über 35 Milliarden US Dollar getätigt. Seitdem in 2015 Ungereimtheiten in den Bilanzen entdeckt wurden wurde der gesamte Vorstand ausgetauscht sowie mehrmals bei den Umsatz- und Gewinnerwartungen zurück gerudert.
Seit über einem Jahr versucht der neue Vorstandsvorsitzenden Joe Papa den immensen Schuldenberg abzubauen. Anfang des Jahres konnte er durch den Verkauf von drei Hautpflegemarken und der Krebsmedikamentedivision Dendrean diesen um stolze sieben Prozent zurückfahren. Zudem wird auch auf neue Wirkstoffe mit Blockbusterpotential wie Brodalumab oder Relistor gesetzt. Das neue Medikament zur Behandlung von Schuppenflechte, Siliq, soll im zweiten Halbjahr für einen monatlichen Preis von 3500 US Dollar am Markt eingeführt werden und damit billiger sein als sämtliche Konkurrenzprodukte.
Der Starinvestor und Hedge Funds Manager Bill Ackman hat nach jahrelanger aktiver Unterstützung des Vorstand seine Anteile an Valeant mit Milliardenverlusten verkauft. Seitdem ist die Aktie weiter im Sinkflug. Die Bewertung ist erschreckend tief und um die aktuellen Kurse zur rechtfertigen müssen Aktionäre regelrecht ein Horrorszenario einpreisen. Das gesamte Unternehmen ist niedriger bewertet als der für dieses Jahr erwartete operative Gewinn vor Abschreibungen. Alleine im ersten Quartal erwarten Analysten ein Nettoergebnis von über 80 Cent pro Aktie.
Valeant schiebt neben den selbst zugefügten Imageproblemen weiterhin einen immensen Schuldenberg von 30 Milliarden US Dollar vor sich her. Es gilt diesen nun weiter abzubauen. Deswegen sollte es zum Verkauf weiterer Wirkstoffe und Sparten kommen. Da Zukäufe in naher Zukunft ausgeschlossen werden fokussiert sich Valeant auf die eigene Forschung und Entwicklung. Der Kurs der Aktie ist sehr stark ausgebombt und der Titel bietet eine interessantes Investitionsmöglichkeit für risikobewusste Investoren.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 54.783.643 von 007coolinvestor am 23.04.17 10:55:30Bitte immer mit Link zur Quelle.
https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/04/22/why-now-is-not-the…
Ich frage mich schon zur Motivation der Verfasser dieses Artikels, was sie damit bezwecken, und wie sie davon Leben.
Entweder sind es Altruisten, die uns nur vor Schaden bewahren wollen?
oder
Gekaufte Schreiber für die Shorties?
Meinungen.
https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/04/22/why-now-is-not-the…
Ich frage mich schon zur Motivation der Verfasser dieses Artikels, was sie damit bezwecken, und wie sie davon Leben.
Entweder sind es Altruisten, die uns nur vor Schaden bewahren wollen?
oder
Gekaufte Schreiber für die Shorties?
Meinungen.
Valeant's valuation proposition is murky at best
George Budwell: If you're considering buying Valeant's stock, you're probably doing so with the idea that this once high-flying specialty pharma can somehow mount a miraculous comeback. But the harsh reality is that Valeant may have little of value to offer investors a year or so from now based on its dire need to divest core assets to bring its debt levels down to reasonable levels.
The point is that Valeant simply doesn't stack up well from a value standpoint compared to some other beaten-down biotech or biopharma stocks that investors may be considering right now. Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:GILD), for instance, has a fairly clean balance sheet, with over $30 billion in cash that can be used to create value, and it is still the top dog for both the HIV and hepatitis C drug markets. Gilead's internal controls also haven't repeatedly been called into question over the last year, and the biotech has a respectable clinical pipeline to boot.
In other words, it's hard to justify taking the enormous risk on a company like Valeant that offers only a murky valuation proposition moving forward -- especially when far better deals like Gilead are readily available.
The thesis is busted
Brian Feroldi: Given the never-ending stream of negative headlines coming out of Valeant, it might be hard to remember why investors got behind this growth story in the first place. However, if you rewind the clock just a few years, you would see that many on Wall Street believed that Valeant had stumbled upon a terrific new business model in the pharma industry.
What was this new business model? Here's a review of what the company did between 2010 and 2015 that caused its share price to skyrocket 900%:
Use the debt markets to acquire other pharma companies that had approved drugs on the market
Gut the acquired company's research and development budget, driving down costs
Jack up the prices of the newly acquired drug, which helped to juice revenue
Rinse and repeat
This unconventional strategy allowed Valeant's revenue and profits to soar for several years, leading to the huge share-price appreciation. However, this model proved to be unsustainable after the company's pricing and distribution strategies came under fire. That ultimately threw a wrench in the company's business model, leading to where we are today.
While there could be value in Valeant's shares today, there's not doubt that the original bull thesis for owning this stock is now dead. That's why I plan on staying far away from this broken company.
Till debt do us part
Sean Williams: If you ask me, there isn't a time to buy Valeant Pharmaceuticals. I struggle to find any truly redeeming qualities in this company that may struggle to survive. But topping the list of its concerns, and the reason why investors should pass on what looks to be a dangerous value trap, is the likelihood that it'll eventually breach its debt covenants with its secured lenders.
It's no secret that Valeant is lugging around a lot of debt. It ended 2016 with $29.85 billion in debt, and it has since paid down at least $1.1 billion in debt, primarily derived from completing the sale of three medicated skincare product lines to L'Oreal for $1.3 billion, as well as from positive free cash flow. The irony is that the company's aggregate debt isn't what necessarily could be its downfall. It's the company's cost to service its debt relative to what it's generating in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) that may be its undoing.
While there's no concrete EBITDA-to-interest coverage ratio that signifies a healthy versus unhealthy company, Valeant's lenders had previously demanded the company keep this ratio above three. In other words, if it spent $1.5 billion in interest expenses annually, it needed $4.5 billion in full-year EBITDA to satisfy its lenders and ensure it didn't violate its debt covenants. In 2017, Valeant is forecasting $3.55 billion to $3.7 billion in EBITDA and $1.85 billion in interest expenses to service its debt. This implies a ratio that could fall below 2-to-1.
Valeant has, on numerous occasions, reworked its debt covenants with senior secured lenders in return for fees and higher interest rates, and it may need to do so again in the future with its EBITDA forecasts proving unreliable on an almost quarterly basis. In other words, even if Valeant is able to meet its debt obligations, it may still default on its covenants, triggering a potential fire sale of its assets to repay lenders.
Valeant is in bad shape, and investors would be best off avoiding the stock altogether
George Budwell: If you're considering buying Valeant's stock, you're probably doing so with the idea that this once high-flying specialty pharma can somehow mount a miraculous comeback. But the harsh reality is that Valeant may have little of value to offer investors a year or so from now based on its dire need to divest core assets to bring its debt levels down to reasonable levels.
The point is that Valeant simply doesn't stack up well from a value standpoint compared to some other beaten-down biotech or biopharma stocks that investors may be considering right now. Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:GILD), for instance, has a fairly clean balance sheet, with over $30 billion in cash that can be used to create value, and it is still the top dog for both the HIV and hepatitis C drug markets. Gilead's internal controls also haven't repeatedly been called into question over the last year, and the biotech has a respectable clinical pipeline to boot.
In other words, it's hard to justify taking the enormous risk on a company like Valeant that offers only a murky valuation proposition moving forward -- especially when far better deals like Gilead are readily available.
The thesis is busted
Brian Feroldi: Given the never-ending stream of negative headlines coming out of Valeant, it might be hard to remember why investors got behind this growth story in the first place. However, if you rewind the clock just a few years, you would see that many on Wall Street believed that Valeant had stumbled upon a terrific new business model in the pharma industry.
What was this new business model? Here's a review of what the company did between 2010 and 2015 that caused its share price to skyrocket 900%:
Use the debt markets to acquire other pharma companies that had approved drugs on the market
Gut the acquired company's research and development budget, driving down costs
Jack up the prices of the newly acquired drug, which helped to juice revenue
Rinse and repeat
This unconventional strategy allowed Valeant's revenue and profits to soar for several years, leading to the huge share-price appreciation. However, this model proved to be unsustainable after the company's pricing and distribution strategies came under fire. That ultimately threw a wrench in the company's business model, leading to where we are today.
While there could be value in Valeant's shares today, there's not doubt that the original bull thesis for owning this stock is now dead. That's why I plan on staying far away from this broken company.
Till debt do us part
Sean Williams: If you ask me, there isn't a time to buy Valeant Pharmaceuticals. I struggle to find any truly redeeming qualities in this company that may struggle to survive. But topping the list of its concerns, and the reason why investors should pass on what looks to be a dangerous value trap, is the likelihood that it'll eventually breach its debt covenants with its secured lenders.
It's no secret that Valeant is lugging around a lot of debt. It ended 2016 with $29.85 billion in debt, and it has since paid down at least $1.1 billion in debt, primarily derived from completing the sale of three medicated skincare product lines to L'Oreal for $1.3 billion, as well as from positive free cash flow. The irony is that the company's aggregate debt isn't what necessarily could be its downfall. It's the company's cost to service its debt relative to what it's generating in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) that may be its undoing.
While there's no concrete EBITDA-to-interest coverage ratio that signifies a healthy versus unhealthy company, Valeant's lenders had previously demanded the company keep this ratio above three. In other words, if it spent $1.5 billion in interest expenses annually, it needed $4.5 billion in full-year EBITDA to satisfy its lenders and ensure it didn't violate its debt covenants. In 2017, Valeant is forecasting $3.55 billion to $3.7 billion in EBITDA and $1.85 billion in interest expenses to service its debt. This implies a ratio that could fall below 2-to-1.
Valeant has, on numerous occasions, reworked its debt covenants with senior secured lenders in return for fees and higher interest rates, and it may need to do so again in the future with its EBITDA forecasts proving unreliable on an almost quarterly basis. In other words, even if Valeant is able to meet its debt obligations, it may still default on its covenants, triggering a potential fire sale of its assets to repay lenders.
Valeant is in bad shape, and investors would be best off avoiding the stock altogether
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 54.780.622 von marty44 am 22.04.17 13:14:13Ich gebe Dir Recht; eigentlich sollte man den Handel mit Derivaten unterbinden. Die schließen eine Wette ab, daß der Kurs fällt, und verkaufen Aktien die sie garnicht haben; für mich ist das pervers. VRX hat einen realen Kurswert von 23 $ )konservativ berecht; der idelle Wert liegt bei 57 $ pro Aktie.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 54.780.622 von marty44 am 22.04.17 13:14:13Hier wird suggeriert die Finanzierung wäre noch nicht geregelt , dabei geht es nur darum wie es ab 2020 / 2023 weitergeht. Das Valeant die Schulden nicht komplett aus laufendem Cash Flow bis dahin zahlen kann, dürfte jeden klar sein. ( Kann auch die Allianz, VW und Daimler nicht) Fakt ist jedoch die Verschuldung sinkt von Quartal zu Quartal
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 54.780.097 von tantemartha am 22.04.17 11:07:16Die Einen zünden Bomben, um mit Shortpapieren Erfolg zu haben (s. Borussia Dortmund), die anderen Profis arbeiten mit "Analysten" wie A.F. und Cramer & Co. und fetten Computern etc.
Ist unter dem Strich für mich dasselbe.
Wankelmütige Longanleger werden dazu getrieben den Kursverlust zu realisieren.
Ist unter dem Strich für mich dasselbe.
Wankelmütige Longanleger werden dazu getrieben den Kursverlust zu realisieren.
Falsche und reißerische Berichterstattung
Fast schon kriminell ist die Berichterstattung -- reißerische Schlagzeile wie z.BValeant Shares Plummet as Debt Issues Remain Unsolved, Prices New Psoriasis Drug
Quelle https://www.thestreet.com/story/14097273/1/valeant-shares-pl…
Im Bericht von Debt unsolved keine Rede
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 54.682.364 von X-Remi am 05.04.17 16:19:20
Klare Antwort
Wie schon gesagt, eigentlich wollte ich mich an einer Schätzung der Q1 Zahlen nicht beteiligen, aber da ihr mich so quält. 1,83 und mit dieser Basis wir rüber
https://finance.yahoo.com/video/cramers-stop-trading-valeant…
Der Herr Cramer mal wieder.
Die letzte Aktie, die ich hatte, und die von Seiten des Herrn Cramer kaputt geschrieben wurde, brauchte dann doch 2 Jahre um dann auf den alten Stand zu steigen.
Der Herr Cramer mal wieder.
Die letzte Aktie, die ich hatte, und die von Seiten des Herrn Cramer kaputt geschrieben wurde, brauchte dann doch 2 Jahre um dann auf den alten Stand zu steigen.
23.05.24 · Accesswire · Bausch Health Companies |
17.05.24 · Accesswire · Bausch Health Companies |
15.05.24 · Accesswire · Bausch Health Companies |
14.05.24 · Accesswire · Bausch Health Companies |
09.05.24 · Accesswire · Bausch Health Companies |
02.05.24 · Accesswire · Bausch Health Companies |
25.04.24 · wO Chartvergleich · BAVARIA Industries Group Akt |
11.04.24 · Accesswire · Bausch Health Companies |
11.04.24 · Accesswire · Bausch Health Companies |
03.04.24 · Accesswire · Bausch Health Companies |