Globex Mining- Startschuss ??? (Seite 1518)
eröffnet am 15.11.05 13:07:13 von
neuester Beitrag 29.04.24 11:51:13 von
neuester Beitrag 29.04.24 11:51:13 von
Beiträge: 32.781
ID: 1.020.143
ID: 1.020.143
Aufrufe heute: 1
Gesamt: 2.344.505
Gesamt: 2.344.505
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: CA3799005093 · WKN: A1H735 · Symbol: GMX
0,9600
CAD
+2,13 %
+0,0200 CAD
Letzter Kurs 01.05.24 Toronto
Neuigkeiten
25.04.24 · globenewswire  |
22.04.24 · kapitalerhoehungen.de |
18.04.24 · globenewswire |
17.04.24 · inv3st.de Anzeige |
Werte aus der Branche Rohstoffe
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 0,8947 | +11,85 | |
| 205,00 | +10,81 | |
| 2,6100 | +9,66 | |
| 0,6200 | +8,77 | |
| 5,1500 | +8,42 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 183,20 | -19,30 | |
| 1,1367 | -22,67 | |
| 12,000 | -25,00 | |
| 8,3600 | -39,81 | |
| 46,06 | -98,04 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 42.798.119 von WilliamTell am 23.02.12 18:58:11Hier noch das was auf Seite 21 steht (z.T. Wiederholungen von vorhin):
Credit for Exploration Work on Claims (it will continue to possible to make a payment in lieu of carrying on mining exploration on claims. However, the payment will more than double the cost of the work requirement),
Areas within Urbanization Perimeter and Areas Dedicated to Recreation (as of May 12, these areas will be withdrawn from staking, map designation, mining exploration and mining operations. To perform work in these areas, a holder of claims will have to obtain the consent of the local municipality, as well as provincial government agencies involved in regulating such activities),
Mine Rehabilitation (Mining leases will be granted by the Minister only if a rehabilitation and restoration plan is approved. The proposed amendments include deposits to cover 100% of the anticipated costs to cover rehabilitation and site restoration),
Bulk Sampling (Sampling of over 50 metric tonnes by a claim holder will continue to be possible with the authorization of the Minister, for the purposes of determining the characteristics of the ore) and,
Plan of Work (notice of staking or the map designation of a claim will have to be accompanied by a plan of work to be performed in the coming year).
Globex has completed a preliminary analysis of the proposed changes. Management believes that a number of measures being adopted by the Quebec Government will have a direct effect on a number of Globex’s Quebec assets. In particular, Bill 14, the proposed new Mining Act, has a number of sections which are detrimental to the exploration industry. Firstly, companies will no longer have the right to enter upon land where the surface rights are privately owned. Previously, mineral rights, which are real property rights, put us on an even footing with surface rights owners so accommodations were always made and settlements reached. This will no longer be the case. Access may be delayed or refused completely. Despite the possible inability to access our mineral rights to do work, the Government of Quebec will still require that we pay taxes and submit assessment work, but although we cannot do the assessment work, the Government has decided to penalize the industry further by doubling the amount to be paid in cash in lieu of work. Further, the Quebec Government has refused to set up any type of arbitration system which could mitigate these problems.
Secondly, the Quebec Government previously designated urbanized areas as requiring municipal approval before exploration or mining could be undertaken. The industry generally supported this move as sensible.
Unfortunately, the Quebec Government, without consultation, has designated large lightly populated areas of the province “villégiature” loosely translated as “rural population”. In these areas, all exploration will be suspended and exploration or mining may not proceed without the prior approval of municipalities and the appropriate provincial government agencies. In addition, under the proposed rules, municipal approval as well as Government approval must be obtained prior to acquiring mineral rights. Unfortunately, this makes the acquisition of mineral rights in these areas subject to local politics and the potential for a lack of objectivity and fairness whereas the previous system was an unbiased first come first served system. Oversight will now be by parties unwilling and/or technically unable to effectively manage their new mandate.
In addition to the new mining laws, the Quebec Government announced a “Plan Nord”, an ambitious plan that envisions removing 50% of the large area covered by the plan from any type of industrial activity. At this time, Management does not know what this will mean to companies working in the area nor how the Quebec Government will decide upon which areas will be withdrawn from development.
These measures and many others in the new law and Plan Nord have become important risks when doing business in Quebec and Globex is reassessing its expenditures in the province as well as other possible courses of action. Finding and Developing Economic Reserves: The recoverability of amounts capitalized for mineral properties and related deferred costs is dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, confirmation of the Company's interest in the underlying mineral claims, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to complete the development, and future profitable production or proceeds from the disposal thereof.
Gruss William
Credit for Exploration Work on Claims (it will continue to possible to make a payment in lieu of carrying on mining exploration on claims. However, the payment will more than double the cost of the work requirement),
Areas within Urbanization Perimeter and Areas Dedicated to Recreation (as of May 12, these areas will be withdrawn from staking, map designation, mining exploration and mining operations. To perform work in these areas, a holder of claims will have to obtain the consent of the local municipality, as well as provincial government agencies involved in regulating such activities),
Mine Rehabilitation (Mining leases will be granted by the Minister only if a rehabilitation and restoration plan is approved. The proposed amendments include deposits to cover 100% of the anticipated costs to cover rehabilitation and site restoration),
Bulk Sampling (Sampling of over 50 metric tonnes by a claim holder will continue to be possible with the authorization of the Minister, for the purposes of determining the characteristics of the ore) and,
Plan of Work (notice of staking or the map designation of a claim will have to be accompanied by a plan of work to be performed in the coming year).
Globex has completed a preliminary analysis of the proposed changes. Management believes that a number of measures being adopted by the Quebec Government will have a direct effect on a number of Globex’s Quebec assets. In particular, Bill 14, the proposed new Mining Act, has a number of sections which are detrimental to the exploration industry. Firstly, companies will no longer have the right to enter upon land where the surface rights are privately owned. Previously, mineral rights, which are real property rights, put us on an even footing with surface rights owners so accommodations were always made and settlements reached. This will no longer be the case. Access may be delayed or refused completely. Despite the possible inability to access our mineral rights to do work, the Government of Quebec will still require that we pay taxes and submit assessment work, but although we cannot do the assessment work, the Government has decided to penalize the industry further by doubling the amount to be paid in cash in lieu of work. Further, the Quebec Government has refused to set up any type of arbitration system which could mitigate these problems.
Secondly, the Quebec Government previously designated urbanized areas as requiring municipal approval before exploration or mining could be undertaken. The industry generally supported this move as sensible.
Unfortunately, the Quebec Government, without consultation, has designated large lightly populated areas of the province “villégiature” loosely translated as “rural population”. In these areas, all exploration will be suspended and exploration or mining may not proceed without the prior approval of municipalities and the appropriate provincial government agencies. In addition, under the proposed rules, municipal approval as well as Government approval must be obtained prior to acquiring mineral rights. Unfortunately, this makes the acquisition of mineral rights in these areas subject to local politics and the potential for a lack of objectivity and fairness whereas the previous system was an unbiased first come first served system. Oversight will now be by parties unwilling and/or technically unable to effectively manage their new mandate.
In addition to the new mining laws, the Quebec Government announced a “Plan Nord”, an ambitious plan that envisions removing 50% of the large area covered by the plan from any type of industrial activity. At this time, Management does not know what this will mean to companies working in the area nor how the Quebec Government will decide upon which areas will be withdrawn from development.
These measures and many others in the new law and Plan Nord have become important risks when doing business in Quebec and Globex is reassessing its expenditures in the province as well as other possible courses of action. Finding and Developing Economic Reserves: The recoverability of amounts capitalized for mineral properties and related deferred costs is dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, confirmation of the Company's interest in the underlying mineral claims, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to complete the development, and future profitable production or proceeds from the disposal thereof.
Gruss William
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 42.797.862 von WilliamTell am 23.02.12 18:27:11Steht im Report Q3:
On May 12, 2011, the Quebec Government introduced Bill 14 which seeks to amend Quebec’s Mining Act. Globex holds its properties under this Act. Globex has completed a preliminary analysis of the proposed changes. Management believes that a number of measures being adopted by the Quebec Government may have a negative impact on a number of Globex’s Quebec assets. Firstly, companies will no longer have the right to enter upon land where the surface rights are privately owned. Previously, mineral rights, which are real property rights, put us on an even footing with surface rights owners so accommodations were always made and settlements reached. This will no longer be the case. Under the proposed legislation, access to properties may be delayed or refused completely. Despite the possible inability to access our mineral rights to do work, the Government of Quebec intends to still require us to pay taxes and submit assessment work. If we cannot do the required assessment work, the Government has decided to penalize the industry further by doubling the amount to be paid in cash in lieu of work. Further, the Quebec Government has refused to set up any type of arbitration system which could mitigate these problems.
Secondly, the Quebec Government previously designated urbanized areas as requiring municipal approval before exploration or mining could be undertaken. The industry generally supported this move as sensible. Unfortunately, the Quebec Government, without consultation, has designated large lightly populated areas of the province “villégiature” loosely translated as “rural population”. In these areas, all exploration and mining will be suspended without the prior approval of municipalities and the appropriate provincial government agencies. In addition, under the proposed rules, municipal approval as well as Government approval must be obtained prior to acquiring mineral rights. Unfortunately, this makes the acquisition of mineral rights in these areas subject to local politics and the potential for a lack of objectivity and fairness whereas the previous system was an unbiased first come first served system. Oversight will now be by parties unwilling and/or technically unable to effectively manage their new mandate.
In addition to the new mining laws, the Quebec Government announced a “Plan Nord”, an ambitious plan that envisions removing 50% of the large area covered by the plan from any type of industrial activity. At this time, Management does not know what this will mean to companies working in the area nor how the Quebec Government will decide upon which areas will be withdrawn from development.
These measures and many others in the new law and Plan Nord have become important risks when doing business in Quebec and Globex is reassessing its expenditures in the province as well as other possible courses of action. Further details are outlined under Risks and Uncertainties page 21.
Gruss William
On May 12, 2011, the Quebec Government introduced Bill 14 which seeks to amend Quebec’s Mining Act. Globex holds its properties under this Act. Globex has completed a preliminary analysis of the proposed changes. Management believes that a number of measures being adopted by the Quebec Government may have a negative impact on a number of Globex’s Quebec assets. Firstly, companies will no longer have the right to enter upon land where the surface rights are privately owned. Previously, mineral rights, which are real property rights, put us on an even footing with surface rights owners so accommodations were always made and settlements reached. This will no longer be the case. Under the proposed legislation, access to properties may be delayed or refused completely. Despite the possible inability to access our mineral rights to do work, the Government of Quebec intends to still require us to pay taxes and submit assessment work. If we cannot do the required assessment work, the Government has decided to penalize the industry further by doubling the amount to be paid in cash in lieu of work. Further, the Quebec Government has refused to set up any type of arbitration system which could mitigate these problems.
Secondly, the Quebec Government previously designated urbanized areas as requiring municipal approval before exploration or mining could be undertaken. The industry generally supported this move as sensible. Unfortunately, the Quebec Government, without consultation, has designated large lightly populated areas of the province “villégiature” loosely translated as “rural population”. In these areas, all exploration and mining will be suspended without the prior approval of municipalities and the appropriate provincial government agencies. In addition, under the proposed rules, municipal approval as well as Government approval must be obtained prior to acquiring mineral rights. Unfortunately, this makes the acquisition of mineral rights in these areas subject to local politics and the potential for a lack of objectivity and fairness whereas the previous system was an unbiased first come first served system. Oversight will now be by parties unwilling and/or technically unable to effectively manage their new mandate.
In addition to the new mining laws, the Quebec Government announced a “Plan Nord”, an ambitious plan that envisions removing 50% of the large area covered by the plan from any type of industrial activity. At this time, Management does not know what this will mean to companies working in the area nor how the Quebec Government will decide upon which areas will be withdrawn from development.
These measures and many others in the new law and Plan Nord have become important risks when doing business in Quebec and Globex is reassessing its expenditures in the province as well as other possible courses of action. Further details are outlined under Risks and Uncertainties page 21.
Gruss William
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 42.797.229 von Tschonko am 23.02.12 17:11:48@tschonko
Klar sind wir hier an Infos interessiert.....dann stell mal bitte weitere Infos rein.
Uebrigens David Zurbuchen, das tönt ziemlich schweizerisch.....genauer gesagt Berner Oberland.
Gruss William
Klar sind wir hier an Infos interessiert.....dann stell mal bitte weitere Infos rein.
Uebrigens David Zurbuchen, das tönt ziemlich schweizerisch.....genauer gesagt Berner Oberland.
Gruss William
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 42.797.699 von hansihans am 23.02.12 18:05:28Ich meine in einem Report von diesem Problem schon gelesen zu haben. Du kannst also Jack nicht unterstellen, dass er seinen Job nicht mache. Wer die Berichte aufmerksam durchliest ist informiert.
Gruss William
Gruss William
@ Tschonko
Merci für den Beitrag, sehr interessant. Allerdings genau das, was von mir (und anderen hier) auch "bemägelt" wird.
Würde gerne noch mehr lesen und vielleicht sollten wir das auch Jack schicken. Ist jetzt wirklich ernst gemeint. So wird ihm vielleicht endlich klar, dass dieses Verwirrspiel mit 120+ Projekten nicht zum Ziel führt. Hier sind es eben nicht die Köche sondern die Projekte, die den Brei verderben.
Gerne würde ich ihn auch mal fragen, wieso man in einem Deutschen Forum von den politischen Schwierigkeiten in Quebec erfahren muss und nicht von der betroffenen Firma. Bitte nicht falsch verstehen, was er privat macht, ist mir ziemlich egal. Aber diese Geschichte betrifft ganz klar den Geschäftsgang von Globex und ist damit für mich eine Info an die Aktionäre wert.
Wohlgemerkt, jede kleine Pubs Bohrmeldung MUSS er veröffentlichen, aber wenn es in einem Staat darum geht, es einem Unternehemszweig (hier die Minenindustrie) Steine in den Weg zu legen, welche das Geschäft wirklich massiv beeinträchtigen können (William hat es erwähnt - wir hatten ((oder haben)) es schon gehabt), dann ist funkstille.
Man kann es nicht jedem Recht machen, aber ich finde, das gehört sich als CEO!
Merci für den Beitrag, sehr interessant. Allerdings genau das, was von mir (und anderen hier) auch "bemägelt" wird.
Würde gerne noch mehr lesen und vielleicht sollten wir das auch Jack schicken. Ist jetzt wirklich ernst gemeint. So wird ihm vielleicht endlich klar, dass dieses Verwirrspiel mit 120+ Projekten nicht zum Ziel führt. Hier sind es eben nicht die Köche sondern die Projekte, die den Brei verderben.
Gerne würde ich ihn auch mal fragen, wieso man in einem Deutschen Forum von den politischen Schwierigkeiten in Quebec erfahren muss und nicht von der betroffenen Firma. Bitte nicht falsch verstehen, was er privat macht, ist mir ziemlich egal. Aber diese Geschichte betrifft ganz klar den Geschäftsgang von Globex und ist damit für mich eine Info an die Aktionäre wert.
Wohlgemerkt, jede kleine Pubs Bohrmeldung MUSS er veröffentlichen, aber wenn es in einem Staat darum geht, es einem Unternehemszweig (hier die Minenindustrie) Steine in den Weg zu legen, welche das Geschäft wirklich massiv beeinträchtigen können (William hat es erwähnt - wir hatten ((oder haben)) es schon gehabt), dann ist funkstille.
Man kann es nicht jedem Recht machen, aber ich finde, das gehört sich als CEO!
Trading Spotlight
Zitat von WilliamTell: In Toronto wurden 50,000 Stück gehandelt.
Gruss William
Ich weiß auch warum.
Kent wer von euch "Metal Augmentor"?
Betreiben Tom Szabo und David Zurbuchen
Die haben übrigens Qualität.
Qualität ist ja hier ein Fremdwort.
Jedenfalls sind die aufmerksam geworden auf Globex.
Bei Bedarf kann ich hier mehr reinstellen.
Szabo, mit dem ich schon des öfteren zu tun hatte, bringt es auif den Punkt.
Globex Mining: Subscriber 31Floors made a strong case for specialty metal explorer and process developer Globex Mining and we added the following:
...Was aware of Globex but not how much the share price has gone down — seems like there is quite a bit of long term value at such levels. One thing I’d like to see them do is prioritize and get some attention on the truly valuable projects — continue to JV or otherwise monetizing them over time while retaining substantial upside in the form of a royalty or working interest. They also need to make sure all partners on these projects are capable of doing the proper work and credible in the eyes of the market. If they had a world class project and a capable partner to do this in the past years on just ONE project, they would not be trading at these levels...So as much as the company seems like quality and the management is earnest, they need to really get on board with the speculative potential of junior exploration because a sleepy technical project generator isn’t going to get much attention in this market (or any manic market to come). I may be speaking too harshly and in general terms … without having spent that much time going back through their material, just recalling my impression of looking at them in the past — so please correct me where I’m wrong. In any case, I don’t disagree about the long-term value and a stock like this could easily find a spot in a long-term oriented commodity portfolio.
Grüße
Wie auch immer.
Das Engagement mit Globex ist, was die MK betrifft, halt
nur ein einzigstes Trauerspiel.
Da hilt auch das ganze "Gesundreden" nichts.
Aber wer weis, vielleicht sehen wir ja auch einmal eine
Umkehrformation mit einem folgenden Aufwärtstrend.
Bin einmal gespannt wie weit wir noch dem bestehenden Abwärtstrend
folgen. Bis jetzt hatten wir noch nicht einmal eine nennenswerte
Bärenmarktrally.
Das findet man nicht jedes Jahr!!
Das Engagement mit Globex ist, was die MK betrifft, halt
nur ein einzigstes Trauerspiel.
Da hilt auch das ganze "Gesundreden" nichts.
Aber wer weis, vielleicht sehen wir ja auch einmal eine
Umkehrformation mit einem folgenden Aufwärtstrend.
Bin einmal gespannt wie weit wir noch dem bestehenden Abwärtstrend
folgen. Bis jetzt hatten wir noch nicht einmal eine nennenswerte
Bärenmarktrally.
Das findet man nicht jedes Jahr!!
In Toronto wurden 50,000 Stück gehandelt.
Gruss William
Gruss William
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 42.795.350 von hansihans am 23.02.12 12:50:24Wenn ich dort in der Regierung wäre, würde ich definitiv versuchen, einen wie Jack "ruhig zu stellen".
Ich würde es, wenn ich dort politisch was zu sagen hätte, jedenfalls solchen "Quertreibern" wie Jack in aufkommenden Genehmigungsverfahren und Zulassungen recht schwer machen.
Seien wir froh, das Du dort nicht das Sagen hast....
So wie ich die Sachlage überblicke, ist das Gesetz noch nicht verabschiedet und vielleicht hilft das Engagement von Jack der Minenindustrie tatsächlich.
Gruss William
Ich würde es, wenn ich dort politisch was zu sagen hätte, jedenfalls solchen "Quertreibern" wie Jack in aufkommenden Genehmigungsverfahren und Zulassungen recht schwer machen.
Seien wir froh, das Du dort nicht das Sagen hast....
So wie ich die Sachlage überblicke, ist das Gesetz noch nicht verabschiedet und vielleicht hilft das Engagement von Jack der Minenindustrie tatsächlich.
Gruss William
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 42.795.555 von kalorex am 23.02.12 13:22:55Ich kenne nur die Einzelheiten, die im Artikel des Abitibi-Express stehen.
Demnach will Jack (vermutlich privat) in Quebec keine Steuern mehr zahlen. Er zahlt nun in Ontario; ob das günstiger ist als in Quebec entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis, kenne das Steuersystem in Kanada nicht.
Habe auch irgendwo gelesen, dass er via seine private Firma JSGL ein Projekt verkauft hat, kann mich aber nicht mehr erinnern, um wieviel Geld es da ging. Bist Du sicher, dass es 5 Millionen waren?
Betreffend dem Gesetz 14 weiss ich nur - und das steht auch in dem Artikel - dass der Abgeordnete Daniel Bernard einen Abänderungsvorschlag eingereicht hat, der ebenfalls niedergeschmettert wurde. Er wollte erreichen, dass gewisse Artikel für die minenreiche Abitibi-Region nicht gelten sollen um das Problem der Minenindustrie etwas zu entschärfen.
Die ganze Problematik besteht darin, dass es beim Grund und Boden zweierlei Rechte gibt. Einerseits das Recht des Landbesitzers und andererseits das Recht des Inhabers des Claims (Minenrecht).
Dies führt oft zu Unstimmigkeiten zwischen den Parteien und ich kann mich erinnern, dass wir auch schon ein Zugangsproblem hatten bei der Option auf das Projekt Grand Calumet, wo dem Optionsnehmer der Zugang zu einem Claim verunmöglicht wurde.
Gruss William
Demnach will Jack (vermutlich privat) in Quebec keine Steuern mehr zahlen. Er zahlt nun in Ontario; ob das günstiger ist als in Quebec entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis, kenne das Steuersystem in Kanada nicht.
Habe auch irgendwo gelesen, dass er via seine private Firma JSGL ein Projekt verkauft hat, kann mich aber nicht mehr erinnern, um wieviel Geld es da ging. Bist Du sicher, dass es 5 Millionen waren?
Betreffend dem Gesetz 14 weiss ich nur - und das steht auch in dem Artikel - dass der Abgeordnete Daniel Bernard einen Abänderungsvorschlag eingereicht hat, der ebenfalls niedergeschmettert wurde. Er wollte erreichen, dass gewisse Artikel für die minenreiche Abitibi-Region nicht gelten sollen um das Problem der Minenindustrie etwas zu entschärfen.
Die ganze Problematik besteht darin, dass es beim Grund und Boden zweierlei Rechte gibt. Einerseits das Recht des Landbesitzers und andererseits das Recht des Inhabers des Claims (Minenrecht).
Dies führt oft zu Unstimmigkeiten zwischen den Parteien und ich kann mich erinnern, dass wir auch schon ein Zugangsproblem hatten bei der Option auf das Projekt Grand Calumet, wo dem Optionsnehmer der Zugang zu einem Claim verunmöglicht wurde.
Gruss William
Durchsuchen
22.04.24 · kapitalerhoehungen.de · Rheinmetall |
16.04.24 · IR-News · Almonty Industries |
09.04.24 · kapitalerhoehungen.de · Bayer |
04.04.24 · Der Finanzinvestor · Barrick Gold Corporation |