Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.:
41.232.950 von WarenBuefet am 18.03.11
17:06:37Naja, nach der Ankündigung ist der Kurs ja in
die Höhe geschossen, danach ging es er aber allmählich wieder
runter. Mehrere Faktoren dürften hier eine Rolle gespielt
haben.
-Einmal natürlich die maue japanische Wirtschaftslage
-die Ankündigung des Koksproduzenten BHP Billiton die Preise
monatlich statt quartalsweise zu bestimmen
-allgemeine Skepsis das die Fusion zu Stande kommt bzw.
funktioniert.
Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass die Fusion zu Stande kommt und
funktionert, da beide Unternehmen jahrelang schon eng kooperiert
haben. Zu den letzten beiden Punkten evt. ein paar interessante
Nachrichten:
vom 18 Februar:
Japan Steelmakers Fall on Coking Report
Mariko Sanchanta and Atsuko Fukase report:
Shares of major Japanese steelmakers, JFE Holdings and Nippon
Steel, are underperforming the broader indexes, down 2.2% at 2,715
yen ($32.56) and 1.3% at 304 yen, respectively.
The drops follow a Nikkei report that Anglo-Australian resource
giant BHP Billiton has notified major Japanese steelmakers that it
wants coking coal prices— now determined quarterly—to be set
monthly, starting in April.
“There have already been concerns that steelmakers are having
difficulty transferring the rising prices to their clients, so
earnings will be more directly hit by prices if this reported
change takes place,” a trader at a Japanese brokerage said.
Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities has a neutral rating and a
2,800 yen target price on JFE Holdings, and an outperform rating
with a 360 yen target price on Nippon Steel. Nippon Steel and JFE
declined to comment on the report.
vom 28. Februar
Japan Pays Steep Price for Slow Deals
When Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Industries announced plans to
merge last month in a watershed deal, a few crucial ingredients
were missing: Neither company had enlisted financial advisers and
merger ratios and a new management structure hadn’t been agreed
upon. The deal is set to be consummated by October–October 2012,
that is.
Welcome to the curious world of domestic mergers and acquisitions
in consensus-focused Japan. In a country that is quickly losing its
competitiveness to other Asian nations in part because of
overcapacity in the manufacturing sector, the pace of consolidation
in Japan has been glacial.
The Nippon Steel-Sumitomo deal was the steel industry’s first big
merger in a decade. In that time, Nippon Steel, once one of Japan’s
“national champions,” was overtaken by both Baosteel Group of China
and Posco of South Korea in terms of crude steel production.
The dearth of details surrounding the Nippon Steel deal has left
many analysts scratching their heads. “In the U.S. or Europe, by
the time two companies announce a big merger, they’re at about 50
on a scale of one to 100, if 100 means the deal is done,” says one
M&A banker in Japan. “In Japan, it’s in the low single digits.
Companies need a long time to build consensus from
stakeholders.”
Maybe too long, in the case of Nippon Steel and Sumitomo. Several
promising deals that were short on details fell apart last year,
including a proposed combination of Japan’s top beer maker, Kirin
Holdings, and closely held Suntory Holdings, because of squabbling
over who would control the merged entity.
Both Nippon Steel and Sumitomo dispute the idea that a lengthy
consummation period and lack of details could derail the deal,
citing an alliance between the two that dates to 2002 and cements
their relationship.
Nobuo Sayama, managing director of GCA Savvian, an independent
investment-banking firm, said tie-ups in Japan can fall apart when
companies make announcements without hammering out the contentious
details first: the merger ratio, the management structure and how
integration will proceed.
“Can Nippon Steel-Sumitomo Metal clear such hurdles? It really
depends on how much trust the top executives have for each other,”
Mr. Sayama said.
Outbound M&A has increased rapidly in the past few years as
Japanese companies race to globalize their operations and take
advantage of the purchasing power of the strong yen. But when it
comes to domestic consolidation, the number of deals has declined.
Outbound cross-border M&A volume rose 25% in 2010 to $34.4
billion from a year earlier, while domestic M&A deal volume
fell to $87 billion from $128.4 billion, according to Dealogic.
The Japanese government, watching as monolithic South Korean and
Russian industrial consortia snag lucrative infrastructure projects
overseas, wants to make it easier for Japanese companies to merge.
The country’s antimonopoly watchdog, the Japan Fair Trade
Commission, is to unveil new guidelines about its merger screening
process in the near future, and bankers hope they will include
abandoning the practice of engaging in advance consultations with
companies pursuing mergers, which can take months to resolve. An
FTC spokesman declined to comment.
Sectors rife for consolidation include steel, chemicals, consumer
electronics, auto makers, retailers and beverages. Others may
follow if the Nippon Steel-Sumitomo deal goes as planned. “When
these domestic deals start happening, it’s like dominoes falling,”
the M&A banker said.
But given Japan Inc.’s track record, holding one’s breath might not
be a good idea. That could leave Japan Inc. at a continuing
disadvantage against bigger, united rivals elsewhere.