interessant, die Aussage eines Neurologen zu patient#3 - 500 Beiträge pro Seite
eröffnet am 29.04.05 22:07:42 von
neuester Beitrag 29.04.05 22:23:42 von
neuester Beitrag 29.04.05 22:23:42 von
Beiträge: 5
ID: 978.228
ID: 978.228
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 543
Gesamt: 543
Aktive User: 0
Top-Diskussionen
Titel | letzter Beitrag | Aufrufe |
---|---|---|
11.01.09, 16:18 | 10659 | |
vor 49 Minuten | 9686 | |
vor 51 Minuten | 7537 | |
heute 17:28 | 5844 | |
vor 46 Minuten | 4979 | |
vor 41 Minuten | 4790 | |
vor 49 Minuten | 3799 | |
vor 1 Stunde | 2882 |
Meistdiskutierte Wertpapiere
Platz | vorher | Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % | Anzahl | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 1. | 18.744,82 | +0,08 | 186 | |||
2. | 4. | 6,5000 | +34,34 | 184 | |||
3. | 7. | 42,30 | +49,58 | 107 | |||
4. | 9. | 7,0900 | +1,63 | 53 | |||
5. | 18. | 3,2990 | +23,60 | 49 | |||
6. | 3. | 163,26 | +2,46 | 47 | |||
7. | 6. | 11,924 | -1,84 | 44 | |||
8. | 5. | 0,1920 | -2,04 | 43 |
Do we know where patient #3 (CD) was hospitalized. I have heard #1 was Colorado and #2 was UCSF.
Neuropathology is tricky and not done frequently at many places. I`m wondering if the original path sample was reviewed by neuropathology or just pathology. As an example, where I trained, every brain biopsy sample was reviewed by neuropathologists, usually conferenced if interesting. Where I am now, all neuropathology is first read locally and most is then sent to a nearby academic center. At the AAN meeting, they mentioned that the pathology was reviewed in March by two independent neuropathologists who both agreed that the sample represented PML. I don`t know the identitites nor qualifications of these 2 neuropathologists. I also don`t know if they were asked for a diagnosis without mentioning PML or whether they were asked if the sample could be PML. I would think it would be the former as they would want a true second and third opinion. I also wonder if the MRIs were reviewed by neuroradiologists (or neurologists) or just radiologists.
At the AAN, they did mention that #3`s white blood cell counts were low. That side effect is much more likely to occur with azathioprine (in fact that`s how we dose it, by following WBC) than with Tysabri (where WBC counts stayu the same or increase). Either way, I think the azathioprine played a very major role and he was not washed out before restarting Tysabri the second time. Although, he was on `monotherapy` at time of diagnosis, he was still in the window of long term effects of azathioprine.
Neuropathology is tricky and not done frequently at many places. I`m wondering if the original path sample was reviewed by neuropathology or just pathology. As an example, where I trained, every brain biopsy sample was reviewed by neuropathologists, usually conferenced if interesting. Where I am now, all neuropathology is first read locally and most is then sent to a nearby academic center. At the AAN meeting, they mentioned that the pathology was reviewed in March by two independent neuropathologists who both agreed that the sample represented PML. I don`t know the identitites nor qualifications of these 2 neuropathologists. I also don`t know if they were asked for a diagnosis without mentioning PML or whether they were asked if the sample could be PML. I would think it would be the former as they would want a true second and third opinion. I also wonder if the MRIs were reviewed by neuroradiologists (or neurologists) or just radiologists.
At the AAN, they did mention that #3`s white blood cell counts were low. That side effect is much more likely to occur with azathioprine (in fact that`s how we dose it, by following WBC) than with Tysabri (where WBC counts stayu the same or increase). Either way, I think the azathioprine played a very major role and he was not washed out before restarting Tysabri the second time. Although, he was on `monotherapy` at time of diagnosis, he was still in the window of long term effects of azathioprine.
also ich gehe nun einmal davon aus, dass Patient#3 -derjenige aus der SENTINEL-Studie, der 2003 verstarb...und dessen Diagnose nachträglich in PML geändert wurde (ursprünglich Gehirntumor) - nicht der Monotherapie zugeordnet werden kann, da zum Zeitpunkt der fatalen Folgen die immunsuppressive Wirkung von Azathioprin noch andauerte.
meine Zuversicht wächst...zeni, das dürfte ein gutes Börsenjahr werden.
nice weekend
CH
nice weekend
CH
sorry Patient#3 hat natürlich nicht an der SENTINEL- sondern an der ENACT2-Studie (MorbusCrohn) teilgenommen
DUBLIN, Ireland & CAMBRIDGE, Mass. & SAN DIEGO, Sep 29, 2004 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Elan Corporation, plc and Biogen Idec today announced that they have submitted a Marketing Authorisation Application (MAA) to the European Medicines Agency for the approval of ANTEGREN(R) (natalizumab) as a treatment for Crohn`s disease. Additionally, the companies presented new 12-month data from the Phase III maintenance trial, ENACT-2 (Evaluation of Natalizumab As Continuous Therapy-2), today at the United European Gastroenterology Week meeting in Prague, Czech Republic, and these data were included in the filing.
DUBLIN, Ireland & CAMBRIDGE, Mass. & SAN DIEGO, Sep 29, 2004 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Elan Corporation, plc and Biogen Idec today announced that they have submitted a Marketing Authorisation Application (MAA) to the European Medicines Agency for the approval of ANTEGREN(R) (natalizumab) as a treatment for Crohn`s disease. Additionally, the companies presented new 12-month data from the Phase III maintenance trial, ENACT-2 (Evaluation of Natalizumab As Continuous Therapy-2), today at the United European Gastroenterology Week meeting in Prague, Czech Republic, and these data were included in the filing.
die folgenden Zeilen sind die Quintessenz:
At the AAN, they did mention that #3`s white blood cell counts were low. That side effect is much more likely to occur with azathioprine (in fact that`s how we dose it, by following WBC) than with Tysabri (where WBC counts stayu the same or increase). Either way, I think the azathioprine played a very major role and he was not washed out before restarting Tysabri the second time. Although, he was on `monotherapy` at time of diagnosis, he was still in the window of long term effects of azathioprine.
also jetzt ist aber schluss
nice we
ch
At the AAN, they did mention that #3`s white blood cell counts were low. That side effect is much more likely to occur with azathioprine (in fact that`s how we dose it, by following WBC) than with Tysabri (where WBC counts stayu the same or increase). Either way, I think the azathioprine played a very major role and he was not washed out before restarting Tysabri the second time. Although, he was on `monotherapy` at time of diagnosis, he was still in the window of long term effects of azathioprine.
also jetzt ist aber schluss
nice we
ch
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie eine neue Diskussion.
Meistdiskutiert
Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
---|---|---|
179 | ||
173 | ||
105 | ||
56 | ||
48 | ||
46 | ||
43 | ||
41 | ||
39 | ||
36 |
Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
---|---|---|
30 | ||
29 | ||
28 | ||
28 | ||
26 | ||
23 | ||
21 | ||
20 | ||
19 | ||
18 |