checkAd

    interessant, die Aussage eines Neurologen zu patient#3 - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

    eröffnet am 29.04.05 22:07:42 von
    neuester Beitrag 29.04.05 22:23:42 von
    Beiträge: 5
    ID: 978.228
    Aufrufe heute: 0
    Gesamt: 543
    Aktive User: 0


     Durchsuchen

    Begriffe und/oder Benutzer

     

    Top-Postings

     Ja Nein
      Avatar
      schrieb am 29.04.05 22:07:42
      Beitrag Nr. 1 ()
      Do we know where patient #3 (CD) was hospitalized. I have heard #1 was Colorado and #2 was UCSF.

      Neuropathology is tricky and not done frequently at many places. I`m wondering if the original path sample was reviewed by neuropathology or just pathology. As an example, where I trained, every brain biopsy sample was reviewed by neuropathologists, usually conferenced if interesting. Where I am now, all neuropathology is first read locally and most is then sent to a nearby academic center. At the AAN meeting, they mentioned that the pathology was reviewed in March by two independent neuropathologists who both agreed that the sample represented PML. I don`t know the identitites nor qualifications of these 2 neuropathologists. I also don`t know if they were asked for a diagnosis without mentioning PML or whether they were asked if the sample could be PML. I would think it would be the former as they would want a true second and third opinion. I also wonder if the MRIs were reviewed by neuroradiologists (or neurologists) or just radiologists.

      At the AAN, they did mention that #3`s white blood cell counts were low. That side effect is much more likely to occur with azathioprine (in fact that`s how we dose it, by following WBC) than with Tysabri (where WBC counts stayu the same or increase). Either way, I think the azathioprine played a very major role and he was not washed out before restarting Tysabri the second time. Although, he was on `monotherapy` at time of diagnosis, he was still in the window of long term effects of azathioprine.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 29.04.05 22:13:51
      Beitrag Nr. 2 ()
      also ich gehe nun einmal davon aus, dass Patient#3 -derjenige aus der SENTINEL-Studie, der 2003 verstarb...und dessen Diagnose nachträglich in PML geändert wurde (ursprünglich Gehirntumor) - nicht der Monotherapie zugeordnet werden kann, da zum Zeitpunkt der fatalen Folgen die immunsuppressive Wirkung von Azathioprin noch andauerte.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 29.04.05 22:15:33
      Beitrag Nr. 3 ()
      meine Zuversicht wächst...zeni, das dürfte ein gutes Börsenjahr werden.

      nice weekend
      CH
      Avatar
      schrieb am 29.04.05 22:20:11
      Beitrag Nr. 4 ()
      sorry Patient#3 hat natürlich nicht an der SENTINEL- sondern an der ENACT2-Studie (MorbusCrohn) teilgenommen


      DUBLIN, Ireland & CAMBRIDGE, Mass. & SAN DIEGO, Sep 29, 2004 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Elan Corporation, plc and Biogen Idec today announced that they have submitted a Marketing Authorisation Application (MAA) to the European Medicines Agency for the approval of ANTEGREN(R) (natalizumab) as a treatment for Crohn`s disease. Additionally, the companies presented new 12-month data from the Phase III maintenance trial, ENACT-2 (Evaluation of Natalizumab As Continuous Therapy-2), today at the United European Gastroenterology Week meeting in Prague, Czech Republic, and these data were included in the filing.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 29.04.05 22:23:42
      Beitrag Nr. 5 ()
      die folgenden Zeilen sind die Quintessenz:

      At the AAN, they did mention that #3`s white blood cell counts were low. That side effect is much more likely to occur with azathioprine (in fact that`s how we dose it, by following WBC) than with Tysabri (where WBC counts stayu the same or increase). Either way, I think the azathioprine played a very major role and he was not washed out before restarting Tysabri the second time. Although, he was on `monotherapy` at time of diagnosis, he was still in the window of long term effects of azathioprine.


      also jetzt ist aber schluss
      nice we
      ch


      Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben


      Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
      Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie
      hier
      eine neue Diskussion.
      interessant, die Aussage eines Neurologen zu patient#3