DAVOS: Facebook-Managerin Sandberg verteidigt Daten-Geschäftsmodell (Seite 7) | Diskussion im Forum

[faultcode]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 61.965.476 von faultcode am 19.11.19 21:43:41

https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-knows-it-encourages-di…



Siehe auch:

28.5.
Facebook's algorithm is a sociopath, and Facebook management is too greedy to stop it
https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-algorithm-sociopath…
...

[faultcode]

18.11.
Mark Zuckerberg has always said Facebook is a platform for authenticity. But phoney identities have reached a record high, a big problem for a company that trumpets user growth — a barometer of health to investors...
https://twitter.com/FinancialTimes/status/119633727397499289…

[springbok]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 61.634.865 von faultcode am 07.10.19 01:12:14

Ich habe noch nie gelesen das eine Frau Presidentin der USA geworden ist.

[faultcode]

je näher die US-Wahl rückt, umso nervöse wird der kleine Mark:

5.10.
Facebook’s Zuckerberg says he would ‘go to the mat’ over ‘existential’ threat to his business from Elizabeth Warren
Showdown between Mark Zuckerberg and Elizabeth Warren, in leaked audio and text - Warren says she’s ‘not afraid’
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/facebooks-zuckerberg-says-…

[faultcode]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 61.098.130 von faultcode am 24.07.19 19:40:35

Die verdächtige Übernahme-Praxis von Facebook

2.8.
https://boerse.ard.de/aktien/die-verdaechtige-uebernahme-pra…

=>
Die US-Verbraucherschutzbehörde FTC nimmt laut "Wall Street Journal" die Übernahme-Praxis des Social-Media-Giganten Facebook unter die Lupe.

Die Behörde prüfe, ob sich der Konzern gezielt Technologie-Start-Ups einverleibe, bevor sie zu einer Konkurrenz heranwachsen könnten.

[faultcode]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 61.098.019 von faultcode am 24.07.19 19:22:21

FTC Imposes Billion Penalty and Sweeping New Privacy Restrictions on Facebook (3) - Abfang Sheryl Sandberg(?)

zu (~) oben:
• nicht nur wegen der gestrigen Vereinbarung, aber auch, erwarte ich das Ausscheiden von Sheryl Sandberg bei Facebook innerhalb "angemessener" Zeit - also so 1...2 Jahre


--> der kleine Mark bekommt ja nun ein ganzes Komitee mit dem Independent Privacy Committee zur Seite gestellt:

H. “Independent Privacy Committee” means a committee of Respondent’s Board of Directors, consisting of Independent Directors, all of whom meet the Privacy and Compliance Baseline Requirements.


...und damit nicht genug. Auch soll dem zur Seite gestellt werden:

• Compliance Officer(s):

C. Designate a qualified employee or employees to coordinate and be responsible for the Privacy Program (“Designated Compliance Officer(s)”), one of whom will be the Chief Privacy Officer for Product, subject to the reasonable approval of the Independent Privacy Committee, and who may only be removed from such position by Respondent with an affirmative vote of a majority of the Independent Privacy Committee;


..und ein "Third-party assessor":

c. The Designated Compliance Officer(s) shall deliver a quarterly report (“Quarterly Privacy Review Report”) to the Principal Executive Officer and to the Assessor that provides:
(i) a summary of the Privacy Review Statements generated during the prior fiscal quarter under Part VII.E.2.b, including a detailed discussion of the material risks to the privacy, confidentiality, and Integrity of the Covered Information that were identified and how such risks were addressed;
(ii) an appendix with each Privacy Review Statement generated during the prior fiscal quarter under Part VII.E.2.b; and
(iii) an appendix that lists all privacy decisions generated during the prior fiscal quarter under Part VII.E.2.a;


d. The appendices required under Part VII.E.2.c.(ii) and (iii) shall be provided to the Assessor no fewer than twenty-one (21) days in advance of the quarterly meeting of the Independent Privacy Committee as specified in Part X.A.5. A copy of the summary in the Quarterly Privacy Review Report required under VII.E.2.c.(i) shall be provided to Assessor no fewer than fourteen (14) days in advance of the quarterly meeting; and...

<alles nicht erschöpfend>



--> die Product Manager bei Facebook werden ab nun so richtig ihre Freude haben

--> aber gut, nun ist der "digitale Sweatshop" eben auch in den höheren Rängen bei Facebook angelangt

[faultcode]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 61.097.893 von faultcode am 24.07.19 19:01:18

FTC Imposes Billion Penalty and Sweeping New Privacy Restrictions on Facebook (2)

zu (+) oben:
• persönlich bin ich aber schon enttäuscht, daß COO Sheryl Sandberg mit keinem Wort in der Order erwähnt wird: https://www.facebook.com/sheryl
<sie wurde ja seinerseit extra dafür eingestellt, daß eben diese Verstösse, wie nun geahndet, eben nicht passieren --> das war (indirekt) also schon damals absehbar im Grundsatz! (~)>


=> stattdessen haben "nur" Zuckerberg, Colin Stretch (Vice- President and General Counsel) und ein aktueller Rechtsvertreter auf der Seite von Facebook unterschrieben:





=> das mMn Kuriose daran (Ok, ist Rechtswesen):

Colin Stretch hat Facebook Ende 2018 verlassen!

25.07.2018
Facebook’s top lawyer is leaving the company
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/25/facebooks-top-lawyer-colin-s…

..war aber wohl noch in diesem Fall vorrangig als Facebook's Rechtsvertreter involviert bis zum derzeitigen Abschluss

=> so gesehen, kann ihm die nun einsetzende Umsetzung der verabredeten Maßnahmen bei Facebook so gut wie egal sein

[faultcode]

FTC Imposes $5 Billion Penalty and Sweeping New Privacy Restrictions on Facebook (1)

FTC settlement imposes historic penalty, and significant requirements to boost accountability and transparency
24.7.
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2019/07/ftc-i…

--> Link zur Order, 31 PDF-Seiten: https://t.co/Q5HC6g9JOn

=> Mark Zuckerberg wird als "Principal Executive Officer" namentlich erwähnt --> und als "Principal Executive Officer" 13-mal in der gerichtlichen Verfügung:

"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA":
"STIPULATED ORDER FOR CIVIL PENALTY, MONETARY JUDGMENT, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF"


--> das ist (soweit ich das sehe) der 2. Schuss vor den Bug nach 2012 --> Alleged Violations of 2012 Order:
• insgesamt wird 8-mal darauf eingegangen, und die jetzige Verfügung erteilt auch Absolution für die Verfehlungen unter der alten Verfügung von 2012:

In re Facebook, Inc., C-4365, 2012 FTC LEXIS 135 (F.T.C. July 27, 2012)

<wer sich also frägt, warum Mark Zuckerberg sehr willig USD5Mrd. hier rüberschob - und sich die "Aufsichtsdame" Sheryl Sandberg seit einiger Zeit so seltsam wegduckt (+) >


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ansonsten sind nun von Facebook u.a. zu beachten:

Additionally, the order imposes significant new privacy requirements, including the following:

• Facebook must exercise greater oversight over third-party apps, including by terminating app developers that fail to certify that they are in compliance with Facebook’s platform policies or fail to justify their need for specific user data;

• Facebook is prohibited from using telephone numbers obtained to enable a security feature (e.g., two-factor authentication) for advertising;

• Facebook must provide clear and conspicuous notice of its use of facial recognition technology, and obtain affirmative express user consent prior to any use that materially exceeds its prior disclosures to users;

• Facebook must establish, implement, and maintain a comprehensive data security program;

• Facebook must encrypt user passwords and regularly scan to detect whether any passwords are stored in plaintext; and

• Facebook is prohibited from asking for email passwords to other services when consumers sign up for its services.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~







ABER die härteste Sanktion ist mMn diese: das Department of Justice (DoJ) legt sich in Zukunft auch eine "Mappe" über Facebook an!

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall provide to the Department of Justice copies of all of the reports, assessments, notifications, certifications, and other documents required or requested under Parts VII.E.2.e, VIII.A, VIII.H, IX, XI.A, XI.B, XII.A, and XIII of the Decision and Order set forth in Attachment A.

[faultcode]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 61.040.332 von faultcode am 16.07.19 22:35:10

DOJ reportedly to open broad antitrust review of Big Tech; tech stocks dip

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/23/doj-reportedly-to-open-broad…

=>
• The DOJ is launching a broad examination into big tech companies over fresh anti-competitive concerns.
• This is Attorney General William Barr’s strongest action against the tech sector.

...
While the DOJ didn’t disclose specific company names, it is launching the review based on “new Washington threats” from Facebook, Google, Amazon and Apple, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal. The agency will examine practices of online platforms that dominate internet search, social media and retail services, the DOJ said in a statement Tuesday.

It’s the biggest move by Attorney General William Barr, whose growing interest in the tech sector could deepen regulatory pressure on the companies.

Shares of Facebook, Alphabet, and Amazon all fell more than 1% immediately after the report. Apple’s stock also declined.

None of the companies have yet responded to requests for comment.
...

[faultcode]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 61.024.528 von faultcode am 15.07.19 01:53:41

Libra: &quot;blistering reception&quot;

16.7.
Facebook’s Libra cryptocurrency project gets blistering reception from Senate
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/facebooks-libra-cryptocurr…

=>
...Facebook Inc.’s controversial Libra cryptocurrency project encountered a blistering reception from the Senate Banking Committee Tuesday morning despite assurances from the social-media giant that it will comply with banking regulations and offer secure transactions.

“Facebook is dangerous,” ranking committee member Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, said, offering a litany of its disruptive impacts on society, media and politics. “Facebook has demonstrated, through scandal after scandal, that it does not deserve our trust.... We would be crazy to give them a chance to experiment with people’s bank accounts.”

The hearing, the first of two on Libra this week on Capitol Hill, underscores a general distrust of Facebook which reached a record $5 billion settlement with the Federal Trade Commission last week over its data-privacy practices and is likely to be the target of a Justice Department investigation on antitrust matters. The Senate committee’s doubts mirror those of consumers and privacy advocates who question why individuals should entrust Facebook with financial information....


=> es ist klar, daß die USA am King U.S. dollar festhalten wollen; nicht zuletzt die US-Banken, die teilweise recht gute Ergebnisse Mo + Di vorgelegt haben


--> aber wo war Sheryl Sandberg heute?!?

--> Ah! Beim "meeting with some of Facebook’s incredible interns" im Rahmen der FBU = Facebook University

https://www.facebook.com/sheryl/posts/10161924532690177

--> da ist es doch klein viel netter!