Gulf Keystone Irak-Ölperle Deutschland schläft (Seite 48)
eröffnet am 25.08.09 11:36:58 von
neuester Beitrag 22.04.24 16:01:43 von
neuester Beitrag 22.04.24 16:01:43 von
Beiträge: 1.199
ID: 1.152.605
ID: 1.152.605
Aufrufe heute: 2
Gesamt: 182.517
Gesamt: 182.517
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: BMG4209G2077 · WKN: A2DGZ5 · Symbol: GVP1
1,3500
EUR
+1,81 %
+0,0240 EUR
Letzter Kurs 08:00:12 Tradegate
Neuigkeiten
25.04.24 · EQS Group AG  |
25.04.24 · EQS Group AG |
22.04.24 · EQS Group AG |
18.04.24 · EQS Group AG |
Werte aus der Branche Öl/Gas
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 1,915 | +17,13 | |
| 9,0000 | +13,92 | |
| 2,9240 | +10,42 | |
| 13,810 | +10,39 | |
| 45,00 | +9,76 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 325,00 | -9,97 | |
| 0,9400 | -10,48 | |
| 35,24 | -17,49 | |
| 9,3500 | -28,02 | |
| 0,900 | -28,57 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
Da ist man einige Tage beim Skifoarn und schon bricht hier alles zusammen.
Wahnsinn.
Was ist passiert ?
Bitte klärt mich auf.
Da weiß man wirklich nicht, ob ein SL gut ist oder nicht.
rumor
contracts signed as per Analyst Presentation today
Quelle, bitte.
Wahnsinn.
Was ist passiert ?
Bitte klärt mich auf.
Da weiß man wirklich nicht, ob ein SL gut ist oder nicht.
rumor
contracts signed as per Analyst Presentation today
Quelle, bitte.
rumor
contracts signed as per Analyst Presentation today
contracts signed as per Analyst Presentation today
danke für die blumen earthfire 
gutes post von mo3......
I would be surprised to hear anything about Kurdistan is the presentation today and I think questions after may draw a blank- there is really no need for them to discuss it further- the details were quite clearly released 3-4 weeks ago- 5yr exploration license with possible extension, 20yr production license with possible 5 year extension- its a done deal, contracts signed, EXXON happy, KRG happy, me happy, Bobs your uncle and Sallys your Aunt....
gutes post von mo3......
I would be surprised to hear anything about Kurdistan is the presentation today and I think questions after may draw a blank- there is really no need for them to discuss it further- the details were quite clearly released 3-4 weeks ago- 5yr exploration license with possible extension, 20yr production license with possible 5 year extension- its a done deal, contracts signed, EXXON happy, KRG happy, me happy, Bobs your uncle and Sallys your Aunt....
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 42.868.941 von ikarusfly am 08.03.12 09:38:42Morgen Ikarus 
heute 300pc knacken ?c das wäre was...und ein schönes Signal !
Ich wollte mich mal bedanken, für die Infos die du hier immer wieder einstellst !!
Danke und Gruß Earthfire
heute 300pc knacken ?c das wäre was...und ein schönes Signal ! Ich wollte mich mal bedanken, für die Infos die du hier immer wieder einstellst !!
Danke und Gruß Earthfire
morgen .....
If the OWC has not been found at any of the Oil levels, then that level is filled to spill up to that step out well.
So the OWC is further out if thats the case
----------------------------------------------
Thought so Mikey, thanks.
Man if true Shaikan really is a MONSTER!!
I was reading this post last night from BBBS:
BBBS post from June 29th post...
Well spotted duffs55, GKP's latest tender "GKPI-SH-2011-060 - Civil Works for Shaikan Location C" is of course the wellsite for SH-6. So not quite so 'contingent' any more - can't think why LOL! Unless perhaps it is just slightly related to the quest for water, aka the OWC...
Now before some get confused again about well Location letters and well sequence numbers, the following shows the translation based on slide #14 in the May 2010 Investor Presentation:
SH-1 and SH-3: Both close to the green blob labelled Shaikan-1B
SH-2: Shaikan-B Location (around 9 km east of SH-1/3)
SH-4: Shaikan-D Location (around 6 km west of SH-1/3)
SH-5: Shaikan-G Location (around 15 km north-east of SH-1/3)
SH-6: Shaikan-C Location (around 18 km east of SH-1/3)
Just take a moment to consider those step-out distances - mind boggling.
But it's also interesting to look longer at this map, (which is a blown-up version of the contour map for "Top Jurassic TWT P1 (~2230m TVDSS)" aka 'filled-to-spill' shown on slide #18), to undertand why SH-6 can no longer remain contingent. The colours denote the relative 'height' of the structure with yellow being shallowest (crestal parts of the structure) and then passing through orange and red to green, with green corresponding more or less to the base or spill-point of the structure (note how green spreads out north, south and east into the surrounding neighbourhood - but for some strange reason (LOL!) there is no green in SA's direction!). All good so far? Good. Now observe the colours at each well location:
SH-1 and SH-3: Yellow-to-slight orange
SH-2: (B Location): Red
SH-4: (D Location): Yellow
SH-5: (G Location): Orange
SH-6: (C Location): Reddish Green
We already know that SH-1 was far from finding the OWC because of its location near the crest of the structure (LKO was circa -1149m SS). The same geometrical constraint will also impact the SH-4 and SH-5 wells if they are drilled vertically from the selected Locations. i.e. both SH-4 and SH-5 are in near-crestal locations so they would be extremely unlikely to encounter the OWC in the Jurassic. Clearly these two wells have other objectives that are more important, namely proving up reserves to the west (SH-4), and to the north of the main northern W-E fault (SH-5). I mention this mainly to explain that Shaikan appraisal is not just about 'how thick' (as in OWC), but also about 'how long' & 'how wide' (areal extent). So let's not have wild hopeful speculation about finding the Jurassic OWC in either SH-4 or SH-5 (unless they start drilling deviated wells of course!).
So what about SH-2 - it's 'in the red'? The OWC was also not encountered at SH-2, but based on the OIP upgrade to P10 volumes it would seem that LKO has at least been proven down to around -1500m SS. Perhaps it will be proven deeper by the time that middle and lower Jurassic SH-2 results are incorporated, but it will still be some way from proving the -2230m SS filled-to-spill OWC depth, (because the well entered the Triassic well above the Jurassic OWC depth). Well, IMO, if there's no OWC 'in the red' after stepping out 9km what can you do other than step-out another 9km and have another crack 'in the reddish green'. Oh no, another 9km wide by another 700m or so additional thickness down to the OWC - how on earth will the sp survive?
So just how much more patience is needed for SH-6 and the OWC quest? (keep in mind, as in my previous post, SA-1 was also a water-free drill with no sign of an OWC). Well, slide #13 in the latest AGM Presentation says SH-6 spud in August (rig from SH-2). That's only a mon
If the OWC has not been found at any of the Oil levels, then that level is filled to spill up to that step out well.
So the OWC is further out if thats the case
----------------------------------------------
Thought so Mikey, thanks.
Man if true Shaikan really is a MONSTER!!
I was reading this post last night from BBBS:
BBBS post from June 29th post...
Well spotted duffs55, GKP's latest tender "GKPI-SH-2011-060 - Civil Works for Shaikan Location C" is of course the wellsite for SH-6. So not quite so 'contingent' any more - can't think why LOL! Unless perhaps it is just slightly related to the quest for water, aka the OWC...
Now before some get confused again about well Location letters and well sequence numbers, the following shows the translation based on slide #14 in the May 2010 Investor Presentation:
SH-1 and SH-3: Both close to the green blob labelled Shaikan-1B
SH-2: Shaikan-B Location (around 9 km east of SH-1/3)
SH-4: Shaikan-D Location (around 6 km west of SH-1/3)
SH-5: Shaikan-G Location (around 15 km north-east of SH-1/3)
SH-6: Shaikan-C Location (around 18 km east of SH-1/3)
Just take a moment to consider those step-out distances - mind boggling.
But it's also interesting to look longer at this map, (which is a blown-up version of the contour map for "Top Jurassic TWT P1 (~2230m TVDSS)" aka 'filled-to-spill' shown on slide #18), to undertand why SH-6 can no longer remain contingent. The colours denote the relative 'height' of the structure with yellow being shallowest (crestal parts of the structure) and then passing through orange and red to green, with green corresponding more or less to the base or spill-point of the structure (note how green spreads out north, south and east into the surrounding neighbourhood - but for some strange reason (LOL!) there is no green in SA's direction!). All good so far? Good. Now observe the colours at each well location:
SH-1 and SH-3: Yellow-to-slight orange
SH-2: (B Location): Red
SH-4: (D Location): Yellow
SH-5: (G Location): Orange
SH-6: (C Location): Reddish Green
We already know that SH-1 was far from finding the OWC because of its location near the crest of the structure (LKO was circa -1149m SS). The same geometrical constraint will also impact the SH-4 and SH-5 wells if they are drilled vertically from the selected Locations. i.e. both SH-4 and SH-5 are in near-crestal locations so they would be extremely unlikely to encounter the OWC in the Jurassic. Clearly these two wells have other objectives that are more important, namely proving up reserves to the west (SH-4), and to the north of the main northern W-E fault (SH-5). I mention this mainly to explain that Shaikan appraisal is not just about 'how thick' (as in OWC), but also about 'how long' & 'how wide' (areal extent). So let's not have wild hopeful speculation about finding the Jurassic OWC in either SH-4 or SH-5 (unless they start drilling deviated wells of course!).
So what about SH-2 - it's 'in the red'? The OWC was also not encountered at SH-2, but based on the OIP upgrade to P10 volumes it would seem that LKO has at least been proven down to around -1500m SS. Perhaps it will be proven deeper by the time that middle and lower Jurassic SH-2 results are incorporated, but it will still be some way from proving the -2230m SS filled-to-spill OWC depth, (because the well entered the Triassic well above the Jurassic OWC depth). Well, IMO, if there's no OWC 'in the red' after stepping out 9km what can you do other than step-out another 9km and have another crack 'in the reddish green'. Oh no, another 9km wide by another 700m or so additional thickness down to the OWC - how on earth will the sp survive?
So just how much more patience is needed for SH-6 and the OWC quest? (keep in mind, as in my previous post, SA-1 was also a water-free drill with no sign of an OWC). Well, slide #13 in the latest AGM Presentation says SH-6 spud in August (rig from SH-2). That's only a mon
Trading Spotlight
Gestern hätte ich schön einsteigen können, hatte sogar Zeit, nur meine Internetverbindung war sauschlecht, keine zeitnahen Daten kein Trading...
Zitat von ikarusfly: Hate to be a bore, but I did mention this news about Statoil selling up in WQ in my posting on the 9th Feb...!
The reason Helge Lund (Statoil Pres. & CEO) said he was pulling out was mostly down to "deteriorating security concerns" and that their 18-ish % stake wasn't worth the bother.
int. post
http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail/?showthreads=0&thresh…
But there is also more to it than that:
I know from a very reliable, very senior source at the Foreign & Commenwealth Office that Statoil ARE in Kurdistan and actively interested in acquistions. That's not conjecture - that is a fact, from the British government on the ground over there.
Another massive name (and most advanced NOC in the world) joins the goldrush...!
Das genug Majors bzw. Supermajors sind, mit dem nötigen Interesse und das passende Portmonnaie...ist ja eigendlich klar.
Hate to be a bore, but I did mention this news about Statoil selling up in WQ in my posting on the 9th Feb...!
The reason Helge Lund (Statoil Pres. & CEO) said he was pulling out was mostly down to "deteriorating security concerns" and that their 18-ish % stake wasn't worth the bother.
int. post
http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail/?showthreads=0&thresh…
But there is also more to it than that:
I know from a very reliable, very senior source at the Foreign & Commenwealth Office that Statoil ARE in Kurdistan and actively interested in acquistions. That's not conjecture - that is a fact, from the British government on the ground over there.
Another massive name (and most advanced NOC in the world) joins the goldrush...!
The reason Helge Lund (Statoil Pres. & CEO) said he was pulling out was mostly down to "deteriorating security concerns" and that their 18-ish % stake wasn't worth the bother.
int. post
http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail/?showthreads=0&thresh…
But there is also more to it than that:
I know from a very reliable, very senior source at the Foreign & Commenwealth Office that Statoil ARE in Kurdistan and actively interested in acquistions. That's not conjecture - that is a fact, from the British government on the ground over there.
Another massive name (and most advanced NOC in the world) joins the goldrush...!
Zitat von ikarusfly: glückwunsch zum glücklichen händchen
immer wenn die politik sich einmischt wirds kompliziertbin wmi geschädigt
bin wmi geschädigt
Hallo Ikarus, danke.....mein Motto ist an solchen Tagen....Verluste begrenzen..und so billig wie möglich wieder rein.
Das waren wohl in der Tat , ztl. Panikverkäufe gestern....wie du schon schriebst...Übertrieben wird immer...in beide Richtungen !
Nun Intrady geht ja richtig was heute d.h. denke das wir gegen Nachmittag bzw. vor Handelsschluss an der LSE....noch ein neues TH generieren werden !
evtl. erobern wir die 300pc Marke heute noch zurück !
Erfolgreichen Handelstag
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 42.862.090 von Earthfire am 07.03.12 07:48:14naja die eine oder andere ra.. sei für das gleichgewicht zu
tollerieren nur bitte nicht zu viele
....
.... die korektur muste auch für die stärkung des charakters sein
immer noch interessante kurse für einen weitsichtigen
tollerieren nur bitte nicht zu viele
.... .... die korektur muste auch für die stärkung des charakters sein
immer noch interessante kurse für einen weitsichtigen
Durchsuchen
