SOLARWORLD ++ vorab Q-Zahlen 5/11 + gab es einen Aktienrückkauf im 3-Q ? ++ - Älteste Beiträge zuerst (Seite 5513)
eröffnet am 02.11.07 13:32:40 von
neuester Beitrag 24.03.23 19:13:18 von
neuester Beitrag 24.03.23 19:13:18 von
Beiträge: 61.296
ID: 1.134.742
ID: 1.134.742
Aufrufe heute: 1
Gesamt: 4.064.612
Gesamt: 4.064.612
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: DE000A1YCMM2 · WKN: A1YCMM · Symbol: SWVK
0,1880
EUR
0,00 %
0,0000 EUR
Letzter Kurs 08.05.24 Tradegate
Werte aus der Branche Erneuerbare Energien
Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
---|---|---|
1,1026 | +16,06 | |
1,7400 | +14,47 | |
43,00 | +7,50 | |
3,1800 | +7,43 | |
13,400 | +5,51 |
Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
---|---|---|
63,05 | -7,28 | |
6,2900 | -10,14 | |
1,0330 | -10,95 | |
7,5100 | -14,66 | |
1,5700 | -20,35 |
!
Dieser Beitrag wurde von CloudMOD moderiert. Grund: themenfremder Inhalt
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 48.417.861 von StockCruncher am 26.11.14 11:40:20Dann schaue dir momentanen mal die Taxkurve in Frankfurt - freier Fall! Ein Indiz ist, dass der Handel wie bei SV nahezu auf Xetra beschränkt - Frankfurt 3x / 500 Stück und Xetra 199x / 14290 Stück mit vorwiegend Minimengen zum Drücken und wenigen größeren zum Pushen.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 48.417.096 von StockCruncher am 26.11.14 10:46:17Unsinn ist wenn man kategorisch dinge ausschließt oder negiert....
was sagte ulbricht anno dazumal; "Niemand hat die Absicht, eine Mauer zu errichten!"
Überlegungen in alle Richtungen anzustellen warum der kurs ganz offensichtlich seit Wochen zwischen 14,70 € und 15 € gehalten wird macht hingegen durchaus Sinn.....
was sagte ulbricht anno dazumal; "Niemand hat die Absicht, eine Mauer zu errichten!"
Überlegungen in alle Richtungen anzustellen warum der kurs ganz offensichtlich seit Wochen zwischen 14,70 € und 15 € gehalten wird macht hingegen durchaus Sinn.....
was hat sich seitdem getan?
http://global.ofweek.com/news/SolarWorld-refutes-White-House…
SolarWorld refutes White House involvement in US-China trade dispute
By: Jonathan Gifford | pv-magazine | Posted: 08 Aug 2014, 10:08
Share:
The White House has not become involved in the U.S.-China solar trade dispute, currently casting a shadow over the U.S. solar industry.
SolarWorld, one of the instigators of the dispute, has told that while it has been working with the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the company reports it has not been approached by the White House.
SolarWorld's comments refute rumors that executive level intervention had been made in the dispute in an effort to reach a negotiated solution.
The manufacturer, with operations in Germany and the U.S., does not rule out reaching a negotiated solution to the dispute, which threatens to raise module prices in the U.S. by approximately 15% to 20%. However the conditions SolarWorld places on a possible negotiated outcome leave little hope for one being reached.
"SolarWorld has regularly said that it would be interested in meaningful talks about a negotiated solution, be it a suspension agreement or another type of settlement, if two conditions are met," said Timothy Brightbill, SolarWorld's legal council in the matter. "First, any agreement or negotiated solution must eliminate China's unfair trade practices. Second, it must be enforceable."
Brightbill said that Chinese manufacturers had not yet "embrace[d] these core conditions." He added that the result of the European Union-China agreement "hardly inspires confidence."
While a minimum price for Chinese PV modules has been agreed on in the EU, in June, SolarWorld was part of an action that saw a number of accusations of price breaches raised.
SEIA pushes SolarWorld for a "specific proposal"
SolarWorld’s comments come on the same day that the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) urged the company to put a specific proposal on the table in order to facilitate negotiations.
"Continued litigation is bad for the industry and, we believe, bad for SolarWorld. SEIA’s settlement proposal remains the best path forward. But we will not preclude any settlement option that serves the greater interests of the U.S. solar industry," wrote SEIA President and CEO Rhone Resch in a letter to the company.
http://global.ofweek.com/news/SolarWorld-refutes-White-House…
SolarWorld refutes White House involvement in US-China trade dispute
By: Jonathan Gifford | pv-magazine | Posted: 08 Aug 2014, 10:08
Share:
The White House has not become involved in the U.S.-China solar trade dispute, currently casting a shadow over the U.S. solar industry.
SolarWorld, one of the instigators of the dispute, has told that while it has been working with the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the company reports it has not been approached by the White House.
SolarWorld's comments refute rumors that executive level intervention had been made in the dispute in an effort to reach a negotiated solution.
The manufacturer, with operations in Germany and the U.S., does not rule out reaching a negotiated solution to the dispute, which threatens to raise module prices in the U.S. by approximately 15% to 20%. However the conditions SolarWorld places on a possible negotiated outcome leave little hope for one being reached.
"SolarWorld has regularly said that it would be interested in meaningful talks about a negotiated solution, be it a suspension agreement or another type of settlement, if two conditions are met," said Timothy Brightbill, SolarWorld's legal council in the matter. "First, any agreement or negotiated solution must eliminate China's unfair trade practices. Second, it must be enforceable."
Brightbill said that Chinese manufacturers had not yet "embrace[d] these core conditions." He added that the result of the European Union-China agreement "hardly inspires confidence."
While a minimum price for Chinese PV modules has been agreed on in the EU, in June, SolarWorld was part of an action that saw a number of accusations of price breaches raised.
SEIA pushes SolarWorld for a "specific proposal"
SolarWorld’s comments come on the same day that the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) urged the company to put a specific proposal on the table in order to facilitate negotiations.
"Continued litigation is bad for the industry and, we believe, bad for SolarWorld. SEIA’s settlement proposal remains the best path forward. But we will not preclude any settlement option that serves the greater interests of the U.S. solar industry," wrote SEIA President and CEO Rhone Resch in a letter to the company.
Na StockChrucher!
Was sagst du jetzt zu deiner " explodierenden " Fremdaktie. Läuft offensichtlich nach deiner Analyse.
Frankfurt kratzt an der 15 !!
Geht's endlich weiter oder wieder Absturz!!??
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 48.420.912 von 020741 am 26.11.14 15:41:32Wird wohl wie üblich wieder unter 15€ enden. Die Umsätze sind viel zu gering!
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 48.421.056 von StockCruncher am 26.11.14 15:52:06kann sein, muss nicht...
wenn ich da an die gestrige schlussauktion denke, hmmm....
wenn ich da an die gestrige schlussauktion denke, hmmm....
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Investoren beobachten auch:
Wertpapier | Perf. % |
---|---|
-0,01 | |
-6,25 | |
+0,69 | |
+0,86 | |
+1,15 | |
+28,57 | |
-0,89 | |
+0,31 | |
+0,25 | |
+1,04 |
Meistdiskutiert
Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
---|---|---|
176 | ||
91 | ||
88 | ||
87 | ||
81 | ||
64 | ||
49 | ||
36 | ||
36 | ||
27 |