Nymox Reports California Court Issues Preliminary Injunction Against Defendants Lanham, Riley, Cutler and Others

IRVINE, Calif., Nov. 30, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation (“Nymox”) (OTC Markets NYMXF) announced today that the California Superior Court, Orange County (OCSC) has issued an order granting Nymox’s preliminary injunction against Randall Lanham, Richard Cutler, Christopher Riley, and the Committee to Restore Nymox Shareholder Value.

The Court ordered that the above defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees, assigns, and all those acting in active concert or participation with them are:

• Enjoined from using, disclosing, relying on, or otherwise making publicly available any Nymox attorney-client privileged information; and
• Hereby ordered and compelled to: turn over or make available to Nymox, any and all Nymox Information and Nymox Property in defendant’s possession, custody, or control by December 21, 2023.

Earlier on November 3, Nymox announced that the Bahamian Court issued a ruling that suspended the Ex Parte Order of October 3, 2023 wrongly obtained by the so called activist shareholders led by Mr. Lanham, Mr. Riley and others. In the Bahamas, Nymox will be seeking from Mr. Lanham and his accomplices payment of both its legal costs, and separately, damages suffered by Nymox and its directors arising from the wrongful procurement of the Ex Parte Order.

Earlier on November 2, October 3, and on October 27, Nymox had warned its shareholders that false and manipulative behavior was involved in attempts to hold what the Company considered an unlawful, unauthorized, and improper "shareholders meeting" that does not have the support of the Company or anyone currently associated with the Company. Shareholders who are listed on Nymox’s proprietary shareholders list were solicited and contacted by a proxy solicitation company in New York. That Company shareholder list is considered by the Company to be proprietary information that has been stolen by the individuals attempting to have this “shareholders meeting.” Those individuals have used this confidential, stolen information to contact the Company’s shareholders, in violation of their duties as former executives of the Company, in violation of their non-disclosure agreements, in violation of attorney-client confidentiality, and in the Company’s opinion, in violation of the law.