Smith+Nephew to showcase leading, innovative AI-driven robotic-assisted solutions for personalized orthopaedic surgery at AAOS 2024 Annual Meeting - Seite 2

Smith+Nephew's CORI Surgical System and RI.KNEE Robotics v2.0

Proven economic benefits

Smith+Nephew’s robotic-assisted procedural solutions have positive effects on the healthcare economic landscape. For example, patients who received Smith+Nephew robotic-assisted UKA could be discharged in less than 24 hours without complications or readmissions.¹⁴

To learn more about how these advancements in robotic-assisted and personalized surgery support ‘Precision in Motion’ - the company’s uncompromising commitment to freedom of movement - please visit the Smith+Nephew booth (#5469) at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2024 Annual Meeting from February 12-16 in San Francisco, CA.

- ends –

Enquiries

Media
David Snyder                    [phone]
Smith+Nephew

References

1. Chen K et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic arthroplasty. Lonner JH, editor. Robotics in Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: Springer; 2019
2. Yeroushalmi D, Feng J, Nherera L, Trueman P, Schwarzkopf R. Early economic analysis of robotic-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty may be cost effective in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis. J Knee Surg. 2020; DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1712088.
3. Nherera LM, Verma S, Trueman P, Jennings S. Early economic evaluation demonstrates that noncomputerized tomography robotic-assisted surgery is cost-effective in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at high-volume orthopaedic centres. Adv Orthop. 2020;3460675OK with changes to RI.HIP Navigation statement
4. Seyler MT. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a imageless, 2nd generation robot system. Podium Presentation at: 2023 Members Meeting of The Knee Society; September 7–9, 2023; Monterey, California, US.
5. Smith+Nephew 2022. Optimus TKA Tensioner Gap Assessment Verification Report. Internal Report. 10059269.
6. Smith+Nephew 2021. Tensioner Design Verification Test Report. Internal Report. TR100123.
7. Smith+Nephew 2022. Tensioner KPC: Tensioner Calibration Check. Internal Report. TR100116, Rev.B.
8. Smith+Nephew 2022. Tensioner whitepaper supporting evidence report. 10073166 REV A.
9. Davis ET, McKinney KD, Kamali A, Kuljaca S, Pagkalos J. Reduced Risk of Revision with Computer-Guided Versus Non-Computer-Guided THA: An Analysis of Manufacturer-Specific Data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. JB JS Open Access. 2021 Jul 28;6(3):e21.00006. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00006. PMID: 34337286; PMCID: PMC8318654.
10. Ulivi M, Orlandini L, Pascale W, Consonni O, Sansone V. Intraoperative validation of navigated limb measurements in THA using a pinless femoral array. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(5):1026-102)
11. Smith+Nephew 2020. Comparison of operating room footprint for robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty systems. Internal Report. EO.REC.PCS015.002.v1.
12. Canetti R, Batailler C, Bankhead C, Neyret P, Servien E, Lustig S. Faster return to sport after robotic-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparative study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018;138:1765-1771.
13. Mergenthaler G, Batailler C, Lording T, Servien E, Lustig S. Is robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty a safe procedure? A case control study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06051-z.
14. Sephton BM, Shearman A, Nathwani D. 24 hour discharge in unicompartmental knee replacement using the NAVIO^◊ robotic system: A retrospective analysis. Poster presented at: European Knee Society Arthroplasty Conference;2-3 May, 2019; Valencia, Spain
15. Shearman AD, Sephton BM, Wilson J, Nathwani DK. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 2021;141:2147– 2153

  * Pending 510(k) clearance