Fannie Mae (Seite 766)
eröffnet am 11.07.08 16:23:04 von
neuester Beitrag 24.01.24 12:25:58 von
neuester Beitrag 24.01.24 12:25:58 von
Beiträge: 20.467
ID: 1.142.789
ID: 1.142.789
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 2.544.064
Gesamt: 2.544.064
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: US3135861090 · WKN: 856099 · Symbol: FNMA
1,4800
USD
-2,63 %
-0,0400 USD
Letzter Kurs 02:10:00 Nasdaq OTC
Werte aus der Branche Finanzdienstleistungen
Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
---|---|---|
32,00 | +27,95 | |
2,1200 | +25,44 | |
33,00 | +20,00 | |
6,1100 | +18,64 | |
6,3000 | +14,55 |
Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
---|---|---|
1,3800 | -10,39 | |
14,750 | -14,14 | |
1,8775 | -14,17 | |
5,6000 | -14,50 | |
0,7500 | -34,78 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 41.026.193 von hageli13 am 11.02.11 17:10:37Na, das ist der Grund für den Anstieg:
NEW YORK -- The Obama administration plans to wind down bailed-out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the next five to seven years, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Friday.
The taxpayer-owned mortgage giants, which were effectively nationalized in 2008, guarantee nine of every 10 new mortgages along with other government agencies. Delinquencies on home loans backed by the two companies have cost taxpayers more than $150 billion.
The troubled housing market, and the key role sour mortgages played in causing the financial crisis, has led to calls for the federal government to radically reform the way home mortgages are financed. The role of the government in funding those mortgages must also be altered, policy makers, bankers and investors say. Administration officials have vowed to reform the market. In a report delivered today to Congress, the administration outlined its goals for the future of housing finance, and three broad options for legislators to pursue.
The first option calls for a private system in which lenders and investors fund new mortgages, with a limited role for existing federal agencies to subsidize home loans for the poor and other special groups, like veterans.
The second proposal calls for much of the same, but it includes a government backstop for mortgages during times of market stress. If the market froze, the government would step in and guarantee home loans.
In the third option, the administration outlined a much broader government role. Under this alternative, taxpayers would insure securities backed by home loans.
NEW YORK -- The Obama administration plans to wind down bailed-out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the next five to seven years, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Friday.
The taxpayer-owned mortgage giants, which were effectively nationalized in 2008, guarantee nine of every 10 new mortgages along with other government agencies. Delinquencies on home loans backed by the two companies have cost taxpayers more than $150 billion.
The troubled housing market, and the key role sour mortgages played in causing the financial crisis, has led to calls for the federal government to radically reform the way home mortgages are financed. The role of the government in funding those mortgages must also be altered, policy makers, bankers and investors say. Administration officials have vowed to reform the market. In a report delivered today to Congress, the administration outlined its goals for the future of housing finance, and three broad options for legislators to pursue.
The first option calls for a private system in which lenders and investors fund new mortgages, with a limited role for existing federal agencies to subsidize home loans for the poor and other special groups, like veterans.
The second proposal calls for much of the same, but it includes a government backstop for mortgages during times of market stress. If the market froze, the government would step in and guarantee home loans.
In the third option, the administration outlined a much broader government role. Under this alternative, taxpayers would insure securities backed by home loans.
warum eigentlich die differenz?
wie mir scheint fängts jetzt gleich an zu rasseln shorties kriegen angst einsteigen, zug fährt ab
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 41.026.066 von printguru am 11.02.11 16:58:41man merkt dass du keine ahnung bzw. kleingeldzocker bist ...
lass doch die anderen machen was sie wollen nd behalte deine "geh jezt raus tipps" für dich .... 30% plus ist hier lächerlich - das geht auch anders - schauen wir mal wenn die shorties erstmal anfangen einzudecken. 1 dollar ist dann minimum ..
lass doch die anderen machen was sie wollen nd behalte deine "geh jezt raus tipps" für dich .... 30% plus ist hier lächerlich - das geht auch anders - schauen wir mal wenn die shorties erstmal anfangen einzudecken. 1 dollar ist dann minimum ..
fannie müsste jetzt gleich bis 0,65 gehen..5 cent Differenz zu Fred
denen ist der anstieg der letzten tage zu schnell gegangen.da wurde mal eben ein gerücht gestreut und die herrschaften konnten wieder mitzocken.elendes pack.
obama und co. haben hier soviel reingesteckt-da kann ich mir einfach
nicht vorstellen das hier nichts gehen sollte.die wollen ihre knete doch auch wieder haben und das mit viel ertrag.
nicht vorstellen das hier nichts gehen sollte.die wollen ihre knete doch auch wieder haben und das mit viel ertrag.