Washington Mutual - Grösste Sparkasse der USA! Chancen & Risiken. (Seite 20551)
eröffnet am 10.04.08 16:35:03 von
neuester Beitrag 24.04.24 15:00:31 von
neuester Beitrag 24.04.24 15:00:31 von
Beiträge: 343.748
ID: 1.140.302
ID: 1.140.302
Aufrufe heute: 4
Gesamt: 18.351.290
Gesamt: 18.351.290
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: US62482R1077 · WKN: A2N7G5 · Symbol: 07WA
73,52
EUR
+0,25 %
+0,18 EUR
Letzter Kurs 08:03:03 Tradegate
Neuigkeiten
24.04.24 · Business Wire (engl.)  |
23.04.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
05.04.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
09.02.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
Werte aus der Branche Finanzdienstleistungen
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 32,00 | +27,95 | |
| 33,00 | +20,00 | |
| 6,1100 | +18,64 | |
| 0,8600 | +14,67 | |
| 6,3000 | +14,55 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 31,77 | -9,54 | |
| 0,6900 | -9,80 | |
| 3,4000 | -10,53 | |
| 14,750 | -14,14 | |
| 1,8775 | -14,17 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 38.601.536 von dig101 am 19.12.09 10:12:29aha du hast noch nicht gesammelt
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 38.601.522 von scheroxx am 19.12.09 10:08:23Warum war es wichtig dass wir über 0,115 $ schließen ?vielleicht sollte man den ganzen Möchtegern Profis erklären dass charttechnisch die ganze Aufwärtsbewegung wieder zunichte gemacht wurde .und das ist leider ein negatives Zeichen .und wenn Leute meinen ach hier wird doch nur aufgesammelt dann haben die wenig Ahnung @ dig
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 38.601.541 von dig101 am 19.12.09 10:13:24erklär das doch bitte mal näher
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 38.601.522 von scheroxx am 19.12.09 10:08:23man hat nicht mehr so viel zeit ,eine einging kommt immer näher 
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 38.601.520 von PhiPIsland am 19.12.09 10:08:02mir würde schon reichen wenn wir das halten oder bei 9 cent stehen bleiben
wir werden erstmal bei 0,08 starten oder tiefer weil wieder welche vor angst schmeissen
wir werden erstmal bei 0,08 starten oder tiefer weil wieder welche vor angst schmeissen
Trading Spotlight
Font Size:
Privilege Takes Center Stage as WaMu Bankruptcy Heats Up
Zach Lowe
The American Lawyer
December 21, 2009
Print Share Email Reprints & Permissions Post a Comment
Lawyers for Washington Mutual filed papers Friday in the bank's Chapter 11 case claiming Sullivan & Cromwell, on behalf of WaMu's new owners at JPMorgan Chase, has been sending out letters asking WaMu's old law firms to turn over their client files on WaMu -- files that include privileged material.
The letters, which WaMu's lawyers at Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart, Oliver & Hedges have attached as exhibits, claim JPMorgan should have access to the privileged documents because JPMorgan and WaMu are essentially the same entity now. Those entities have "joint privilege," the letters claim.
Firms that have received the letters include Weil, Gotshal & Manges, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, Perkins Coie and others.
Quinn Emanuel disagrees with the "joint privilege" notion, and it is not thrilled about how S&C and JPMorgan have been conducting themselves, court records show. The motion Quinn filed Friday asks a judge to require JPMorgan and its lawyers to give WaMu's estate advance notice if they are going to be sending these "joint privilege" letters to law firms and requesting client files. The Quinn motion says the WaMu team has requested advance notice in the last week, but says that JPMorgan's side has "declined to provide" it. (WaMu and Quinn claim they only heard about the letters because the firms that received them contacted WaMu and its lawyers).
Why do JPMorgan and its lawyers want these documents so badly? As we reported last week, JPMorgan and WaMu's estate are engaged in a major spat in which WaMu's estate has accused JPMorgan of improperly using confidential information in 2008 to artificially lower WaMu's asking price and buy the distressed bank on the cheap. (JPMorgan eventually purchased WaMu's assets for $1.9 billion in Sept. 2008 after the FDIC placed WaMu in receivership.)
The letters JPMorgan and S&C sent to the various law firms request piles of documents related to the JPMorgan-WaMu transaction.
We reached out to some of the lead lawyers on both sides (Peter Calamari and Michael Carlinsky at Quinn, and Bruce Clark at S&C) but we have not heard back yet.
In any case, the WaMu bankruptcy is getting very interesting for lots and lots of Am Law 100 firms.
This article first appeared on The Am Law Daily blog on AmericanLawyer.com.
Print Share Email Reprints & Permissions Post a Comment
Privilege Takes Center Stage as WaMu Bankruptcy Heats Up
Zach Lowe
The American Lawyer
December 21, 2009
Print Share Email Reprints & Permissions Post a Comment
Lawyers for Washington Mutual filed papers Friday in the bank's Chapter 11 case claiming Sullivan & Cromwell, on behalf of WaMu's new owners at JPMorgan Chase, has been sending out letters asking WaMu's old law firms to turn over their client files on WaMu -- files that include privileged material.
The letters, which WaMu's lawyers at Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart, Oliver & Hedges have attached as exhibits, claim JPMorgan should have access to the privileged documents because JPMorgan and WaMu are essentially the same entity now. Those entities have "joint privilege," the letters claim.
Firms that have received the letters include Weil, Gotshal & Manges, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, Perkins Coie and others.
Quinn Emanuel disagrees with the "joint privilege" notion, and it is not thrilled about how S&C and JPMorgan have been conducting themselves, court records show. The motion Quinn filed Friday asks a judge to require JPMorgan and its lawyers to give WaMu's estate advance notice if they are going to be sending these "joint privilege" letters to law firms and requesting client files. The Quinn motion says the WaMu team has requested advance notice in the last week, but says that JPMorgan's side has "declined to provide" it. (WaMu and Quinn claim they only heard about the letters because the firms that received them contacted WaMu and its lawyers).
Why do JPMorgan and its lawyers want these documents so badly? As we reported last week, JPMorgan and WaMu's estate are engaged in a major spat in which WaMu's estate has accused JPMorgan of improperly using confidential information in 2008 to artificially lower WaMu's asking price and buy the distressed bank on the cheap. (JPMorgan eventually purchased WaMu's assets for $1.9 billion in Sept. 2008 after the FDIC placed WaMu in receivership.)
The letters JPMorgan and S&C sent to the various law firms request piles of documents related to the JPMorgan-WaMu transaction.
We reached out to some of the lead lawyers on both sides (Peter Calamari and Michael Carlinsky at Quinn, and Bruce Clark at S&C) but we have not heard back yet.
In any case, the WaMu bankruptcy is getting very interesting for lots and lots of Am Law 100 firms.
This article first appeared on The Am Law Daily blog on AmericanLawyer.com.
Print Share Email Reprints & Permissions Post a Comment
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 38.601.518 von FalcoForever2000 am 19.12.09 10:07:46wir wissen schon lange das es nicht mehr um die 4 mrd geht,es geht hier um mehr
wir müssen einfach warten
wir müssen einfach warten
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 38.601.514 von dig101 am 19.12.09 10:06:02und so wie dich kenne hast du gesammelt.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 38.601.507 von dig101 am 19.12.09 10:02:28Leider
Hoffe, dass eine bessere chance kommen wird und mein kauf keine fehlentscheidung war.
Hoffe, dass eine bessere chance kommen wird und mein kauf keine fehlentscheidung war.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 38.601.496 von dig101 am 19.12.09 09:57:59Montag wird denk ich auf eine Gegenreaktion spekuliert ob die von 0,08 - 0,09 oder 0,10 ausgeht werden wir sehen.
Durchsuchen
