checkAd

    Silex Systems - HighTech für die Wachstumsbranchen der Zukunft (Seite 4)

    eröffnet am 16.03.07 18:07:29 von
    neuester Beitrag 02.04.24 17:55:01 von
    Beiträge: 644
    ID: 1.119.208
    Aufrufe heute: 0
    Gesamt: 88.294
    Aktive User: 0

    ISIN: AU000000SLX4 · WKN: 615018
    3,5600
     
    EUR
    -3,78 %
    -0,1400 EUR
    Letzter Kurs 07.05.24 Frankfurt

    Werte aus der Branche Sonstige Technologie

    WertpapierKursPerf. %
    19,100+13,69
    0,6503+10,22
    2,2399+9,26
    16,800+9,09
    45,40+8,61
    WertpapierKursPerf. %
    1,9101-9,48
    1,0500-9,48
    2,9600-10,84
    0,6650-16,35
    3,9200-23,88

    Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben

     Durchsuchen
    • 1
    • 4
    • 65

    Begriffe und/oder Benutzer

     

    Top-Postings

     Ja Nein
      Avatar
      schrieb am 13.12.23 17:43:49
      Beitrag Nr. 614 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 74.955.043 von peikler am 13.12.23 08:20:58Und wie es Clay Montgomery korrekt erwähnt: Da sich der zu zahlende Preis von Cameco am SP von SLX orientiert, dürfte es hier gerade spannend werden...
      Ausgesprochen hohes Volumen in AUS in den letzen Tagen, starke Performance!
      Silex Systems | 2,540 €
      1 Antwort
      Avatar
      schrieb am 13.12.23 12:42:11
      Beitrag Nr. 613 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 74.955.043 von peikler am 13.12.23 08:20:58Das zuvor geschriebene ist natürlich nur
      meine eigene Meinung und eine Empfehlung
      zu gar nichts.:)
      Silex Systems | 2,500 €
      Avatar
      schrieb am 13.12.23 08:20:58
      Beitrag Nr. 612 ()
      Hier mal was zum Lesen worum es eigentlich geht.
      Sehr interessant, dass Silex explizit hier mit einbezogen wird.
      Wenn Cameco die 25% an GLE haben will, und das wollen die ganz bestimmt,
      dann geht hier die Luzie ab.

      Courtesy of Clay Montgomery on Twitter

      The DoE finally released their Deconversion RFP, a few weeks ago. It didn't get much attention, but it's hugely important because it shows progress towards the critical second part, the Enrichment RFP. They divided the RFP document into two parts, for Deconversion and for Enrichment, because they will be supplied by disparate companies with very different capital requirements. But, together, these RFPs will become the new map of the future US nuclear fuel supply industry and their release is about to make the winners obvious.

      https://energy.gov/ne/articles/us-department-energy-issues-h…

      "DOE plans to issue a second RFP later this year, which focuses on acquiring, storing, and transporting enriched uranium hexafluoride gas to the deconverters." - US DoE

      The DoE has worked quietly on this plan for about 3 years. See how that sentence implies the second RFP is about facilitating deconversion? It's a pathetic attempt at obfuscation.

      What are they trying to hide?

      Welcome to my World!

      The lack of available uranium enrichment capacity in the West is the biggest problem facing the nuclear power and uranium mining industries today. It's the bottleneck that utilities are waiting to see resolved before they step-up their uranium supply contracting game, in earnest. They require the US government to fix this bottleneck and they don't want to be bound to a lot of legacy contracts, signed before this new, incentivized public-private framework is installed.

      Deconversion (UF6 to UO2) is actually a minor step in the fuel chain that's currently done by the existing fuel assembly fabricators, Westinghouse, GE-Hitachi and Framatome. But, isotope enrichment requires huge new infrastructure, which has yet to be financed or built. It's the most expensive part of the whole nuclear fuel supply chain, by far. It's ironic that uranium price volatility was the major factor that delayed the Enrichment RFP. But, most enrichers refuse to assume that risk and the DoE was careful not to shut-out potential suppliers because of foreign ownership, size or ability to raise capital. What matters is their ability to economically deliver enriched uranium product, which has been established by technology readiness demonstrations that have been in development for years, such as GLE's test loop in North Carolina, and the DoE's centrifuge cascade, built and operated by Centrus Energy in Ohio.

      So, the DoE is hoping they can quietly install this new framework to fund multiple, huge, new enrichment capacity construction projects to save the US nuclear industry from itself. Pay no attention to the precarious state of the current industry, due to decades of poor leadership and reliance on cheap Russian LEU imports. And, BTW, the other company that will be hired to rebuild the US nuclear fuel industry to replace the Russian imports, is a tiny, pre-revenue, Australian technology company that's not even on Wall Street's radar!

      The pressure from Congress and utilities on the DoE to get these RFPs released and awarded is enormous. I spoke to Mike Goff about it in August, and he insisted they will be released by the end of 2023. Dr. Goff is the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for the US Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy. The Deconversion RFP announcement seems to confirm this, "DOE plans to issue a second RFP later this year". The release of the Deconversion RFP didn't attract much attention because much less money is involved, but it's important because it shows progress toward the second part, which is much more complicated and important. The deadline for the Deconversion proposals is the end of January and the timing for awards on the Enrichment RFP will also be as fast. But, there's a lot more money at stake.

      There is a third part, for uranium conversion (U308 to UF6) infrastructure BTW, which also needs major expansion. But, that was another RFP, already awarded to Honeywell's ConverDyn, last year. They skipped competitive bidding entirely on that, showing how urgent the problem is. Only ConverDyn was in a position to respond quickly enough to that, anyway.

      The enrichment problem is too big for any one of these companies to handle alone and Congress will not allow that anyway. Mike Goff agrees. So, while only Centrus has experience building and operating the only US-owned and sourced centrifuges required to produce higher enriched uranium for the military, that cascade is too small (16 tubes) and the tech is too old to scale to the 1200 centrifuges required for the commercial needs. Centrus will certainly get an award to scale to 120 (or maybe 240) centrifuges, but that will still require LEU feedstock supply and their Russian imports will end. My conversations with Centrus indicate they have no intention of ever using foreign-sourced LEU in the DoE's cascade. The DoD won't allow it and neither Urenco nor Orano have centrifuges licensed to provide it.

      It takes a lot more centrifuges to produce LEU than to just boost LEU to HALEU. Scaling back the American centrifuge plan to just boost LEU was a clever way to keep the domestic technology alive until Congress appropriates funding. But, only 16 tubes on that factory floor built for thousands looks silly and 240 tubes will still look silly. What was the problem? The large centrifuges cost way more to build than what Urenco and Orano use and cheap fuel from Russia was easy and addictive. But, using the commercial sector to finance the military's cascade didn't work and now Congress has to fix this mess or admit that they gave away another large and critical industry to Russia and China. The last time the cost of building 1200 large centrifuges was estimated, the number was $3.5 Billion, but that was in 2017 and would have only been the first installment.

      What's the solution? Lasers! Laser enrichment is more energy efficient and will lower the major cost component of nuclear fuel (it's not the uranium). But, reducing the required capital investment for building a huge new enrichment plant is where lasers will really shine. The DoE has been studying those numbers since 1976. Urenco and Orano are building more centrifuges. But, they've never supplied a military cascade before, or any competitor for the emerging HALEU market, either. What's needed is a new entrant that can handle the big problem of LEU production, at scale, with new technology, and that is not entangled with Europe. That's Silex and their GLE partnership with Cameco. The largest nuclear plant operators, Constellation, Duke Energy and Dominion, have already released public statements about their intent to partner with GLE. They have sent teams of engineers to see GLE's demonstration loop in Wilmington, NC. Cameco hired an independent nuclear engineering company (probably BWXT) to evaluate the technology, before acquiring half of GLE, last year. But, all of these major players are waiting for that Enrichment RFP.

      Is the Australian/Canadian ownership of Silex a problem? No. The DoE actually has a mandate to diversify fuel supply risks by funding multiple projects. Silex already operates under the security umbrella of the expanding AUKUS Initiative. Remember that Cameco already acquired Westinghouse, a US company, and the largest fuel assembly maker in the world.

      The DoE is intentionally opaque. But, it helps to look at their history. Laser enrichment technology began at the Los Alamos labs back in 1976 and they produced educational videos about the economic opportunity of recycling depleted UF6, using laser enrichment. The DoE also required USEC (Centrus' original name) to develop it further. USEC's bankruptcy required finding a new home for the technology, so it was sold to the Australian start-up, Silex. But, the DoE still needs this technology to solve the huge depleted UF6 problem that they own. Look at the acres of depleted UF6 tanks shown in this video from 1976. Only laser enrichment is efficient enough to recycle that material, and it's already converted to UF6. Remember that the conversion shortage is even more acute.



      The media only listens to the DoE Secretary. But, she's just a political appointee, building her resume by delivering the White House narratives on "renewables". Recently, Granholm has been forced to talk about nuclear, but only for export. Everyone now agrees that the US should at least try to regain this global industry that we gave away to Russia and China. But, building a complete domestic fuel industry is a critical requirement for that. Scaling the DoE's Centrus cascade, only to be fed LEU from Russia or Europe, is not going to fly. And domestic LEU supply is even more important than HALEU, because it's required by the existing commercial nuclear fleet. GLE is not just the only domestic solution for LEU supply, and depleted UF6 recycling, it's also the DoE's best hope to avoid another political fiasco. A foreign-owned company incorporated and operating exclusively in the US under the AUKUS Initiative, is more politically tenable than Urenco or Orano, which have histories of nuclear technology proliferation and licensing restrictions against military use. The South China Sea is a real problem for Australia and they will need fuel for their nuclear-powered submarines, as well.

      I expect the release of the Enrichment RFP to boost the shares of Centrus, Silex and Cameco, immediately. But, the real fireworks will be when the DoE announces the contract winners. The time in between should be short because the participants already know what's in it. That was the purpose of the HALEU Consortium, created last year, to keep all prospective bidders in the loop.

      I also think the Enrichment RFP release is likely to precipitate some mergers and acquisitions, even before the awards. Cameco wants to purchase more of Silex's shares in GLE, before the market drives the Silex share price up. Cameco does not usually talk about GLE, unless prompted. That's because they still have the option to purchase another 25% of GLE from Silex, up to 75% of the GLE shares. But, the price they must pay depends on the market price of SLX shares. So, it's not in Cameco's interest to brag about GLE, until their purchase option is done.

      Listen to Judge Merrifield, USNIC, testify to the Congressional committees working to fund the DoE's fuel enrichment programs. He explains that only 20% of US commercial needs can be produced in the US now and that even the HEU fuel for the planned 6-8 AUKUS nuclear submarines are at risk if construction does not begin soon.

      https://energy.senate.gov/hearings/2023/11/full-committee-he…

      Considering the history, the winners in the upcoming Enrichment RFP contract awards are becoming obvious. Centrus Energy will get a contract to expand the DoE's cascade and use more of that empty floor space. They will continue to operate and expand the major source of domestic HALEU, but they will also need GLE to provide commercial quantities of LEU to feed that cascade, from recycled UF6.

      Urenco-USA will probably win a contract, also. They are already expanding their centrifuge cascade in New Mexico by 15% to produce LEU+ (enriched up to 10% U235). But, Urenco is owned by the governments of Britain, Germany and France, and a new laser technology entrant is required.

      #uranium #nuclear $SLX.AX $LEU $CCJ
      Silex Systems | 2,430 €
      3 Antworten
      Avatar
      schrieb am 13.12.23 08:01:44
      Beitrag Nr. 611 ()
      Da mein Profil mittlerweile auch mit einem Charttechniker-Abzeichen verziert wird, hier meine Prognose:



      Wer hier noch ganz am Anfang dieser CT-Theorie (0815er) steht, dem helfe ich etwas auf die Sprünge:

      - für mich glasklare HFGTBL-Formation
      - wellenförmig nach oben ohne Rücksetzer in den Bereich von 3 fuffzig
      - danach Konso und dann mal abwarten (hängt dann auch von den Fundamentaldaten ab)

      :p :laugh:

      Spaßbeitrag, ich hab 0 Plan in Sachen CT!
      Silex Systems | 2,430 €
      Avatar
      schrieb am 13.12.23 05:20:13
      Beitrag Nr. 610 ()
      Silex hat gerade die 4,01 australische Dollar erreicht. Da war die Kapitalerhöhung. Gibt es einen Abpraller oder marschiert Silex durch? Was meinen die Charttechniker?
      Silex Systems | 2,360 €

      Trading Spotlight

      Anzeige
      InnoCan Pharma
      0,1890EUR -1,82 %
      InnoCan Pharma: Q1 2024 Monster-Zahlen “ante portas”?!mehr zur Aktie »
      Avatar
      schrieb am 12.12.23 14:25:13
      Beitrag Nr. 609 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 74.951.026 von GesamtleiterJim am 12.12.23 13:46:42Allein die Tatsache, dass man sich die Buntmedien anschaut, handelt nach dem Motto:

      "Wer nichts weiß, muss alles glauben"
      Silex Systems | 2,350 €
      Avatar
      schrieb am 12.12.23 14:11:11
      Beitrag Nr. 608 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 74.951.026 von GesamtleiterJim am 12.12.23 13:46:42Da hatte ich bei einem ehemaligen Kollegen am WE, der ursprünglich Landwirt gelernt hatte und nach seinem 10-20 jährigen Bankerlaufbahn wieder back to the roots ist und nun mit ca. 20 Rindern seine Lebzeit verbringen darf.

      Er läd jährlich paar ehemalige Kollegen ein und auch von seiner Familie (Schwiegerleute, Sohn) war jemand da. Meine Güte, absolut top Gespräche und alle mit denen ich gesprochen habe, vollends solide unterwegs was Umwelt, Energiewende, Heute/Damals,... betrifft. Sein Sohn ist 24 und ich bin 37 - danach kam dann lange nix und ging wohl so ab Ende 40 weiter - nur zwecks Einordnung :D

      Sein Schwiegervater meinte, er ist vollkommen Co2-Neutral unterwegs, weil er einen Elektrospeicherofen hat. Stimmt zwar mMn nicht so ganz, denn er speichert den gewonnenen Strom da ja nur. Wie er produziert wird - denn er hat weder Windrad noch PVA auf dem Dach - wäre da ja nicht zu vernachlässigen. Zudem ging es um ein als erstes geschlossenes Kohlekraftwerk. Habe leider den Namen des Kraftwerkes vergessen, muss aber bei mir in der Nähe (Sachsen) gewesen sein. Ein weiterer Bekannter hat in der Energiebranche sein Leben lang gearbeitet und es klang auf jeden Fall seriös und nachvollziehbar, was er dazu erklärte.

      Wo ich dann ins Stutzen kam: Das Kohlekraftwerk soll eines der saubersten Kraftwerke überhaupt gewesen sein. Und zwar aus dem Grund, weil dort entsprechende Kohlefilter (so hat ers glaube nicht genannt, habe aber den Fachbegriff vergessen) verbaut waren, die den ganzen Schmutz gefiltert haben.

      Das klingt jetzt natürlich in erster Linie etwas wie Stammtisch. Aber solchen Leuten bzw aus solchen Gesprächen nehme ich viel mehr mit als wenn ein Habeck oder Scholz über die Energiewende philosophiert. Passen tut es dann hinten und vorne nicht, was man ja auch schön daran sieht, dass wir wohl Unmengen an Energie aus Frankreich (ATOMKRAFT!!!) importieren :keks:

      Mit dem Mann einer ehemaligen Kollegin ging es dann noch in Richtung Hanf und was damit alles so möglich ist. Sehr cool, hätte ich nicht erwartet und für mich irgendwie ein Zeichen, dass noch genügend Menschen da sind, die nicht ihr Gehirn beim anschauen der Muppetshow abgegeben/verloren haben :D

      Die Quintessenz/Erkenntnis des Tages für mich war allerdings auch: Wenn man in Berlin, Dortmund oder irgend einer zugepflasterten Großstadt lebt, ist es gar nicht so abwegig das man grün wählt. Zumindest vom ursprünglichen Gedanken -> pro Umwelt und so :rolleyes:
      Silex Systems | 2,350 €
      Avatar
      schrieb am 12.12.23 13:46:42
      Beitrag Nr. 607 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 74.949.895 von peikler am 12.12.23 10:52:28
      Zitat von peikler: Keine Sorge, ich habe das schon geblickt! Fassungslos macht mich nur, dass ein ganzes Volk
      wie nakotisiert ist und alles widerspruchslos hinnimmt.


      Ich habe mich am Samstag auf einer Feier mit einem 65 jährigen Architekten unterhalten. Es fing an mit der dämlichen Energie Politik. Dann haben wir über Atomkraft gesprochen. Das andere Länder weiter geforscht haben ( siehe Silex, Lightbridge, Salzreaktor in Ruanda…)
      Ich mache es kurz: so verblendet und ungebildet kann man sein. Der gute Mann hatte 0,00 Plan. Ich bin immer noch fassungslos. Wird denn alles 1:1 aus den Buntmedien übernommen? Bri ihm und seiner Familie ja.
      Grüsse
      Silex Systems | 2,350 €
      2 Antworten
      Avatar
      schrieb am 12.12.23 10:53:24
      Beitrag Nr. 606 ()
      narkotisiert natürlich
      Silex Systems | 2,330 €
      Avatar
      schrieb am 12.12.23 10:52:28
      Beitrag Nr. 605 ()
      Keine Sorge, ich habe das schon geblickt! Fassungslos macht mich nur, dass ein ganzes Volk
      wie nakotisiert ist und alles widerspruchslos hinnimmt.
      Silex Systems | 2,330 €
      3 Antworten
      • 1
      • 4
      • 65
       DurchsuchenBeitrag schreiben


      Silex Systems - HighTech für die Wachstumsbranchen der Zukunft