Starnet- zur Beruhigung!! - 500 Beiträge pro Seite
eröffnet am 09.07.99 15:09:31 von
neuester Beitrag 09.07.99 15:20:11 von
neuester Beitrag 09.07.99 15:20:11 von
Beiträge: 2
ID: 4.824
ID: 4.824
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 556
Gesamt: 556
Aktive User: 0
Top-Diskussionen
Titel | letzter Beitrag | Aufrufe |
---|---|---|
vor 20 Minuten | 2427 | |
vor 5 Minuten | 1917 | |
vor 34 Minuten | 1155 | |
vor 39 Minuten | 797 | |
gestern 21:04 | 681 | |
heute 06:53 | 643 | |
vor 3 Minuten | 634 | |
02.05.24, 18:44 | 571 |
Meistdiskutierte Wertpapiere
Platz | vorher | Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % | Anzahl | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 1. | 18.226,79 | +0,05 | 288 | |||
2. | 2. | 10,380 | -1,89 | 77 | |||
3. | 4. | 1,1200 | -12,50 | 76 | |||
4. | 3. | 172,04 | +0,26 | 66 | |||
5. | 5. | 86,30 | -0,46 | 36 | |||
6. | 6. | 7,0340 | +1,65 | 34 | |||
7. | 7. | 19,264 | +0,28 | 33 | |||
8. | 14. | 18,900 | -0,79 | 30 |
Hallo Starnet-Freunde,
hier ein Artikel zur Beruhigung;
INTERNET STOCK NEWS (TM)
>http://www.internetstocknews.com
>Insight For The Intelligent Internet Investor
>July 9, 1999
>__________________________________________ _________________________________
>Tableof Contents:
>1. ISN Outlook & Exciting ISN Updates!
>2. Summer Earnings Season: Internet Companies to Watch
>3. Will IPO fever ultimately weaken the Internets?
>4. ISN Events
>________________________________________ ___________________________________
>
>1.INTERNET STOCK OUTLOOK
>By Ted Kunzog
>
>What a week! The major averages like the Nasdaq and NYSE powered to record
>highs, voiding the potential Head and Shoulders Top I had mentioned, but
>most Internet stocks were flat to down. Often Internet stocks tend to rise
>into earnings announcements from leading companies like Yahoo! (Nasdaq:
>YHOO) which handily beat earnings estimates) but the market action seemed
>to be centered on the newer players rather than the market leaders. In
>fact, few recent Internet IPOs have NOT been in a strong rally mode. It is
>almost like a host of new investors have just joined the party, while more
>seasoned players are staying away. This is not a good sign; some of the
>market response to the week`s news seems more an indication of "froth" than
>a healthy market.
>
>Thursday, the OTC BB quote system failed, they were unable to display
>current last sale, high/low and volume information for OTCBB and other-OTC
>securities. The OTC BB resolved their problems at about 1:15 p.m. EST by
>resetting the volume to zero. Hopefully, investors were aware of the
>problem and did not "panic sell" any stocks because they looked like their
>trading was halted.
>
>Online gaming market leader StarNet Communications (OTC BB: SNMM) plunged
>on Wednesday following what we consider to be poorly researched negative
>comments by Steve Harmon. In his newsletter (which appeared as the only
>news from SNMM on Yahoo! Finance for that day) he alluded that the company
>could potentially fall victim of Government regulation.
>
>While we respect the opinions of all, simple due diligence will indicate
>Starnet has had no intention of entering regulated markets such as the
>United States. Not only is online gaming just a fraction of Starnet`s
>target market, but the company has actually been targeting foreign markets
>for its gaming licenses and producing a pretty penny since near inception.
> We think the regulation issue is highly overplayed in the media and look
>forward to this company`s upcoming earnings.
hier ein Artikel zur Beruhigung;
INTERNET STOCK NEWS (TM)
>http://www.internetstocknews.com
>Insight For The Intelligent Internet Investor
>July 9, 1999
>__________________________________________ _________________________________
>Tableof Contents:
>1. ISN Outlook & Exciting ISN Updates!
>2. Summer Earnings Season: Internet Companies to Watch
>3. Will IPO fever ultimately weaken the Internets?
>4. ISN Events
>________________________________________ ___________________________________
>
>1.INTERNET STOCK OUTLOOK
>By Ted Kunzog
>
>What a week! The major averages like the Nasdaq and NYSE powered to record
>highs, voiding the potential Head and Shoulders Top I had mentioned, but
>most Internet stocks were flat to down. Often Internet stocks tend to rise
>into earnings announcements from leading companies like Yahoo! (Nasdaq:
>YHOO) which handily beat earnings estimates) but the market action seemed
>to be centered on the newer players rather than the market leaders. In
>fact, few recent Internet IPOs have NOT been in a strong rally mode. It is
>almost like a host of new investors have just joined the party, while more
>seasoned players are staying away. This is not a good sign; some of the
>market response to the week`s news seems more an indication of "froth" than
>a healthy market.
>
>Thursday, the OTC BB quote system failed, they were unable to display
>current last sale, high/low and volume information for OTCBB and other-OTC
>securities. The OTC BB resolved their problems at about 1:15 p.m. EST by
>resetting the volume to zero. Hopefully, investors were aware of the
>problem and did not "panic sell" any stocks because they looked like their
>trading was halted.
>
>Online gaming market leader StarNet Communications (OTC BB: SNMM) plunged
>on Wednesday following what we consider to be poorly researched negative
>comments by Steve Harmon. In his newsletter (which appeared as the only
>news from SNMM on Yahoo! Finance for that day) he alluded that the company
>could potentially fall victim of Government regulation.
>
>While we respect the opinions of all, simple due diligence will indicate
>Starnet has had no intention of entering regulated markets such as the
>United States. Not only is online gaming just a fraction of Starnet`s
>target market, but the company has actually been targeting foreign markets
>for its gaming licenses and producing a pretty penny since near inception.
> We think the regulation issue is highly overplayed in the media and look
>forward to this company`s upcoming earnings.
das ist ja richtig,
aber steve harmon hat nicht auschliesslich auf regulierungen der US regierung hingewiesen, sondern dass er aktien generell nicht mag, die von den "willkürlichen und nicht kommerziell geleiteten Entscheidungen irgenwelcher Regierungen" abhängen (sinngemässes zitat).
insofern ist das nicht ganz von der hand zu weisen.
allerdings müssten dann weltweit etliche regierungen sehr restriktiv vorgehen, bevor es starnet hart trifft.
insofern frage ich mich, warum die leute dann panik sells vorgenommen haben. oder lag das evtl. auch an den problemen am OTC am selbigen tag?
evtl hat der sell off auch überhaupt nichts mit steve harmon zu tun,
der kurs war einfach überhitzt und musste wieder auf eine etwas linearere wachstumslinie herauf. mir ist es auch am liebsten wenn es pro tag mal gerade 1-2% hochgeht. das macht am ende immer noch 100%.
tetsuo
aber steve harmon hat nicht auschliesslich auf regulierungen der US regierung hingewiesen, sondern dass er aktien generell nicht mag, die von den "willkürlichen und nicht kommerziell geleiteten Entscheidungen irgenwelcher Regierungen" abhängen (sinngemässes zitat).
insofern ist das nicht ganz von der hand zu weisen.
allerdings müssten dann weltweit etliche regierungen sehr restriktiv vorgehen, bevor es starnet hart trifft.
insofern frage ich mich, warum die leute dann panik sells vorgenommen haben. oder lag das evtl. auch an den problemen am OTC am selbigen tag?
evtl hat der sell off auch überhaupt nichts mit steve harmon zu tun,
der kurs war einfach überhitzt und musste wieder auf eine etwas linearere wachstumslinie herauf. mir ist es auch am liebsten wenn es pro tag mal gerade 1-2% hochgeht. das macht am ende immer noch 100%.
tetsuo
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie eine neue Diskussion.
Meistdiskutiert
Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
---|---|---|
288 | ||
77 | ||
76 | ||
66 | ||
36 | ||
34 | ||
33 | ||
30 | ||
28 | ||
27 |
Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
---|---|---|
23 | ||
23 | ||
21 | ||
21 | ||
21 | ||
20 | ||
17 | ||
16 | ||
16 | ||
15 |