Qualcomm - wassen los!? ausverkauf!? - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

[Unisphere]

Mahlzeit!!!

Kann nichts finden!!!! Wer weiss was da los is`t?!!!!
Sehr hohe Umsätze!!!! KACKE!! Ausverkauf?!?!!?!?
Call nach kaufen!?!!? raushauen!??!
HILFE!!!!

Der Chart sieht auch wohl eher scheisse aus?!?!!?

Danke für die INfos!!!

grüße Unsiphere!!!!

[BlackAngel]

Anscheinend negativer Artikel in US-Börsenmagazin

[MAdler77]

Qualcomm war im Tief heute exakt an seiner unteren Unterstützung (ca. 34$) seines riesigen Keils angelangt.

Jetzt kannst du nur die Daumen drücken, dass diese Formation den Wert wieder stabilisieren kann. Ein signifikanter druchbruch wäre allerdings ne Katastrophe für QCOM.

Gruss MA77

[Unisphere]

DANKE!!!
wo finde ich aktuelle Chartanalysen zu QCOM?!!??!?!
Was meinst du - gibts jetzt endlich eine starke Erholung!?? Diese ist doch technisch auch überfällig?!??!?!!?
Intraday gehts schon deutlich rauf!!!!!!!

Danke für die Infos und Grüße Unisphere!!

[DerHabicht]

Gibt wohl einige Unstimmigkeiten in der Bilanzierung.
Bin aber zu faul, mich damit zu befassen, da ich nicht beabsichtige, QCOM zu kaufen.

Der Link:

http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/quotes_news.asp?selected=qcom&sour…

Grüße

[eueropa]

Here`s the "detail" section of the complaint I filed with the SEC this afternoon:

The following item was released through Briefing.com today:

"11:27 ET QUALCOMM hit by CFRA report (QCOM) 37.15 -1.96: -- Update -- Stock is latest to get hit by a CFRA (Center for Financial Research & Analysis) report which apparently claims that QCOM`s 10K reveals that the company recorded revenue in exchange for non-cash consideration and accepted non-cash consideration for receivables removed from its balance sheet; hearing that report also noted potential conflicts of interest between company`s Board and auditor, stating that Chairman of Audit Committee, COO, CFO all are former employees of Coopers & Lybrand, predecessor to QCOM`s auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers. Briefing.com cannot verify the accuracy of the CFRA report."

CNBC later reported that this release of "news"--that is, $20 million in non-cash revenue recognition out of $2.7 billion in revenues last year--resulted in the loss of $3 billion in QCOM`s market cap today. CNBC also noted that the small amount of non-cash revenue was entirely disclosed in Qualcomm`s 10K, filed last year.

CNBC`s David Faber also questioned the analyst responsible for the CFRA report. According to Mr. Faber, the analyst admitted that the amount of so-called non- cash revenue was "small."

As to the auditor conflict issue, the CFRA report and the Briefing.com summary specifically mentioned Qualcomm`s CFO, who is Anthony Thornley. While the report accurately notes that Thornley is a former employee of "the predecessor" to Qualcomm`s auditor firm, it neglects to mention that Thornley left the predecessor firm, Coopers & Lybrand, in the 1970s--decades before the firm was acquired by Qualcomm`s current auditor.

Inclusion of this obviously stale, non-material information in order to create the appearance of an Enron-like conflict of interest and "off-balance sheet" transactions calls into question the motivation behind the entire report and press leak.

On its website, CFRA describes itself as follows:

Mission and Background

CFRA is a leading independent financial research organization. Our mission is to warn investors and creditors about companies experiencing operational problems and particularly those that employ unusual or aggressive accounting practices to camouflage such problems.

The following article, however, makes it quite clear that CFRA`s "mission" is hardly one of public service. Rather, CFRA receives thousands of dollars in fees from investment fund managers, investment banks, and other institutional investors having direct financial interests in (or against) the companies about which CFRA issues reports:

http://www.schilit.com/news/newsitem.jsp?item=fortune_4_26_9…

CFRA claims to have no financial interest in the subjects of its ivestigations and reports:

"We don`t say buy or sell, and we don`t take positions in these companies," says [CFRA founder] Schilit . . . "We say, `Here are some numbers you might find interesting if you own this company, numbers that could be a cause for concern.`" His firm--the Center for Financial Research & Analysis--publishes a thick report for clients each month, highlighting potential problems at about a dozen publicly traded companies. More recently, Schilit has also started working as a consultant for money managers like Adams, monitoring each of their stock picks for an added fee."

While I have no reason to question Mr. Schilit`s or CFRA`s lack of financial interest, the same cannot be said for CFRA`s clients--the "fund managers" who retain CFRA. In fact, it is precisely CFRA`s independence, and consequent credibility with disseminators of financial news like Briefing.com, Reuters, etc., that would allow CFRA`s institutional clients to use a CFRA report or summary for purposes of stock price manipulation.

This leads to the following questions, which I believe the enforcement division should investigate:

1. Who commissioned and/or paid for the CFRA report on Qualcomm?

2. When was the report completed and communicated to the commissioning entity?

3. Who else received copies of the report before it was disclosed or summarized to the public?

4. Who communicated or summarized the report to Briefing.com and/or other financial news outlets?

5. What positions, long or short, did the commissioning entity, other private recipients of the report, and those who disseminated the report or its summary through financial news outlets have in Qualcomm stock or its derivatives before, at the time, and after the report was disclosed or summarized to the public?

Investor confidence in corporate America and, more importantly, in our capital markets, is being shaken daily by revelations from the Enron investigation. While we all expect beneficial reform to result, one of the unfortunate side-effects of the ongoing investigation is the opportunity it presents for unscrupulous individuals and institutions to profit from stock price manipulation. One might pursuasively argue that at no time since the adoption of the `34 Act has such manipulation been easier, as the facts outlined in this Complaint might illustrate. I`m sure the Enforcement Division understands that it must act with corresponding vigilence, for investor confidence is the foundation of the capital markets and, to a large extent, of the nation`s economic well-being.

Ich glaube hier wird versucht mit üblen Methoden (ENRON Angstmache) den Titel in den Keller zu treiben!! Was meint ihr ?

[eueropa]

Read the article a second time and you`ll request an
Hier ist noch eine interessante Stellungnahme! Ich schließe mich dem voll an, den CFRA soll man die Kehle durchschneiden!

Aus dem Yahoo Board:
Inquisition for these fucks (CFRA).
Yes, it will be an interesting but daunting task to uncover the vial canards perveyed during yesterday`s manipulative attack. Would it not be just GREAT if some fancied acronym like the CFRA would conjure up some similar bullshit/fearmongering/lies about the CFRA and put their fledgling asses right out of business? Would it not serve their greedy minds just right during this time of national economic unrest to be punished for the dirty little deed they pulled off yesterday? Think how much was profited as they conspired with many a big boy and said let`s short the shit out of QCOM tomorrow about 9:00 a.m....we guarantee that the opportunity will present itself...just like OSAMA said to tune in to CNN on 9/11 at about 9:00a.m. to see something very "interesting". What do these events have in common? Quite simple, my friends---E V I L.
What happened to QCOM can happen at any time to any good stock, and will soon ruin the entire market for all common investors, leaving the huge profits to insiders, big boys, etc.. Think about it...

[eueropa]

The accounting isn`t an issue.
=================================

With regard to accounting for non-cash consideration in exchange
for licenses and receivables, the Company has previously disclosed and
properly accounted for under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP) the value of equity received in exchange for licenses from
early-stage companies. Of the $20 million received in fiscal 2001 in
the form of equity for licenses and receivables, revenues of
approximately $7.0 million were included in revenue in fiscal 2001
compared to the Company`s consolidated revenues of $2.7 billion for
that year. Such transactions are recorded as revenue under APB 29 and SAB 101.

[eueropa]

Here is the whole story. Your sarcasm does not change the fact that shorts are using the "accounting worries" scenario to bring down stocks creating unwarranted fear and panic. What a sick bunch.

This fear driven climate has given investors some exciting opportunities, and if you can tune out the media`s focus on a few horror stories, calmer heads will recognize it`s bargain basement shopping time. You have to believe that most pubilcly traded companies do, in fact, report honest financial statements.

One particularly striking example was the market`s reaction to rumors circulating about telecommunications giant Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOM). One analyst questioned how the company recognized $11 million in revenues last quarter.

The stock responded by losing $3 billion in market cap. This company does $2.7 billion in annual sales. Irwin Jacobs, the Chairman of Qualcomm, recently endowed the San Diego Symphony with $50 million.

$11 million to Qualcomm is petty cash, and the $3 billion market cap loss is a prime example of the absurd levels of fear which rule the markets today. Qualcomm is a screaming buy at these levels.

A quick glance at a chart of the NASDAQ from the end of September low shows an index that has pulled back to a critical support level. A drop below 1680 could take us back to the old lows, but a rebound is more likely from these levels.

Aggressive investors may wish to grab a few shares of their favorite stock at these bargain basement prices. If you are concerned about further downside risk, use a tight stop loss.

[eueropa]

Hier noch eine news wie Analysten ihr dreckiges Spiel mit Qualcomm treiben:

Shorts always overestimate the impact of supposedly bad news and, in this case, have not accounted for the backlash that this kind of "below-the-belt" news reporting is going to have on the upcoming short squeeze in this market starting on Monday.

From the OptionInvestor newsletter:
Friday was another news driven day with rumors and accusations flying everywhere. Leading the list was Qualcomm, which fell to a new low after Maryland based Center for Financial Research and Analysis cited accounting irregularities and potential conflicts
of interest between the board and auditors as well as family members working at the company. CFRA was responsible for wiping out nearly $3 billion in market cap at the lows of the day and all their complaints were really already known. The family members had been there for 15 years according to some commentators reports. The "revenue in exchange for non-cash consideration" claims amounted to only $30 million and was previously disclosed in their published accounting papers. The Qualcomm COO complained that they took old data out of context and attempted to create a news event to capitalize on the current accounting witch hunt.

[Shortguy]

15:16 Uhr: Blitzmeinung von Christof Schmidbauer


Qualcomm hält Wort


Qualcomm wird einen Takt präziser bei seiner Gewinnprognose für das laufende Quartal. Genau 20 Cents je Aktie sollen herausspringen, womit die Analystenerwartungen erfüllt werden. Wichtiger sind die Aussagen zur Umsatzentwicklung. Beim erweiterten Mobilfunkstandard CDMA2000 1X liegt der Chipabsatz um eine Millionen Stück über den eigenen Prognosen. Die übrigen Chips bewegen sich am oberen Ende der Prognose. Gerade diese Entwicklung ist Balsam für geschundene Aktionärsseelen. Qualcomm behält seine Spitzenposition unter den Mobilfunk-Zuliefereren. Der Aktienkurs wird dies honorieren.




© 2002 sharper.de

[Shortguy]

14:51 Uhr: Blitzmeinung von Carsten Kaletta


Qualcomm quält sich über die Runden


Qualcomm spürt die harten Zeiten in der Mobilfunk-Branche. Der amerikanische Mobilfunkausrüster hat zwar im zweiten Quartal des laufenden Geschäftsjahres beim Gewinn je Aktie punktgenau die Erwartungen der Analysten getroffen. Die Umsätze lagen sogar leicht über den Schätzungen der Experten. Doch im Vergleich zum Vorjahr ist der Netto-Gewinn um mehr als die Hälfte eingebrochen. Zudem gibt der Geschäftsausblick keine Anzeichen für eine nachhaltige Erholung. Im Gegenteil: Im laufenden Quartal soll der Gewinn je Aktie nur zwischen 21 und 23 Cent je Anteilsschein liegen. Die Schätzungen der Analysten sehen jedoch 23 Cent je Aktie vor. Die Qualcomm-Aktie hat im derzeitigen Branchen-Umfeld eher schlechte Karten.


sharper.de

[oegeat [KommA]]

????


von 32,5(schlußkurs gestern) auf 31,5

...aha sehe gerade das erste Posting ist vom 8.2.02 damals 34 $ na gut nicht mal 10 % ...



oegeat