Philippinen: Übernahmeplan von Schlüsselindustrien wie Öl- und Stromunternehmen - 500 Beiträge pro Seite
eröffnet am 25.09.05 11:06:38 von
neuester Beitrag 03.05.06 01:32:15 von
neuester Beitrag 03.05.06 01:32:15 von
Beiträge: 5
ID: 1.009.524
ID: 1.009.524
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 1.487
Gesamt: 1.487
Aktive User: 0
Top-Diskussionen
Titel | letzter Beitrag | Aufrufe |
---|---|---|
02.05.24, 18:44 | 625 | |
gestern 22:26 | 106 | |
gestern 22:59 | 81 | |
01.05.24, 18:36 | 75 | |
vor 1 Stunde | 65 | |
gestern 22:11 | 61 | |
vor 1 Stunde | 59 | |
vor 1 Stunde | 47 |
Meistdiskutierte Wertpapiere
Platz | vorher | Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % | Anzahl | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 1. | 181,19 | +0,66 | 96 | |||
2. | 2. | 18.058,00 | +0,07 | 78 | |||
3. | 3. | 0,1865 | 0,00 | 43 | |||
4. | 4. | 2.293,95 | -0,37 | 28 | |||
5. | 6. | 0,0775 | 0,00 | 23 | |||
6. | 5. | 0,1535 | 0,00 | 23 | |||
7. | 7. | 3,8200 | +0,07 | 16 | |||
8. | 8. | 38.670,25 | +1,19 | 16 |
Philipinen: Übernahmeplan von Schlüsselindustrien wie Öl- und Stromunternehmen sowie von Flug- und Schiffahrtslinien durch die phillipinische Regierung. ---> Kontrolle über private Unternehmen.
Auslöser: Der Effekt von der globalen Ölkrise hat die Phillipinen schwer getroffen!
It`s a takeover plan, says DOJ
No martial law; control of private firms studied
First posted 01:16am (Mla time) Sept 25, 2005
By Nestor P. Burgos Jr., Armand N. Nocum
Inquirer News Service
Editor`s Note: Published on page A1 of the September 25, 2005 issue of the Philippine Daily Inquirer
EMERGENCY rule, no; but takeover, yes.
Justice Secretary Raul Gonzalez yesterday said he and Speaker Jose de Venecia had been studying the prospect of a government takeover of key private industries-including oil and power firms and air and shipping lines-after the full effect of the global oil crisis shall have hit the country.
Auslöser: Der Effekt von der globalen Ölkrise hat die Phillipinen schwer getroffen!
It`s a takeover plan, says DOJ
No martial law; control of private firms studied
First posted 01:16am (Mla time) Sept 25, 2005
By Nestor P. Burgos Jr., Armand N. Nocum
Inquirer News Service
Editor`s Note: Published on page A1 of the September 25, 2005 issue of the Philippine Daily Inquirer
EMERGENCY rule, no; but takeover, yes.
Justice Secretary Raul Gonzalez yesterday said he and Speaker Jose de Venecia had been studying the prospect of a government takeover of key private industries-including oil and power firms and air and shipping lines-after the full effect of the global oil crisis shall have hit the country.
Hier könnt Ihr den kompletten Artikel lesen:
http://news.inq7.net/nation/index.php?index=1&story_id=51261
mfg
http://news.inq7.net/nation/index.php?index=1&story_id=51261
mfg
Danke für den Hinweis.
Verstaatlichung - das größte Risiko in den EM
Siehe auch der Enzug von Lizenzen.
Verstaatlichung - das größte Risiko in den EM
Siehe auch der Enzug von Lizenzen.
Palace, Senate see eye to eye on terror bill
First posted 00:54am (Mla time) Oct 07, 2005
By Juliet Labog-Javellana, TJ Burgonio
Inquirer News Service
THE ANTI-TERROR bill is one measure on which the Senate and Malacañang are seeing eye to eye, with the upper chamber putting priority on its passage.
But certain senators yesterday warned that the bill would meet "rough sailing" in the chamber unless fears over its "all-embracing provisions" were addressed.
"There is a need to enact an antiterrorism bill," Senator Joker Arroyo acknowledged. But he added:
"The delay and difficulty in enacting it arises from the apprehension of various quarters that it could be an all-embracing, catch-all law that could be used even in non-terrorist activities.
"Or that ordinary criminal acts will be given the badge of terrorism and thus fall under the anti-terror law with its easier prosecution and higher penalties. That, masked as terrorist crimes, it could be used against the opposition."
The draft bill approved on Tuesday by the House committees on justice and foreign affairs has drawn flak because it provides for warrantless arrest, fines of up to P10 million, harsh penalties such as long imprisonment or death, and limits the media`s access to suspected terrorists.
http://news.inq7.net/nation/index.php?index=1&story_id=52540
First posted 00:54am (Mla time) Oct 07, 2005
By Juliet Labog-Javellana, TJ Burgonio
Inquirer News Service
THE ANTI-TERROR bill is one measure on which the Senate and Malacañang are seeing eye to eye, with the upper chamber putting priority on its passage.
But certain senators yesterday warned that the bill would meet "rough sailing" in the chamber unless fears over its "all-embracing provisions" were addressed.
"There is a need to enact an antiterrorism bill," Senator Joker Arroyo acknowledged. But he added:
"The delay and difficulty in enacting it arises from the apprehension of various quarters that it could be an all-embracing, catch-all law that could be used even in non-terrorist activities.
"Or that ordinary criminal acts will be given the badge of terrorism and thus fall under the anti-terror law with its easier prosecution and higher penalties. That, masked as terrorist crimes, it could be used against the opposition."
The draft bill approved on Tuesday by the House committees on justice and foreign affairs has drawn flak because it provides for warrantless arrest, fines of up to P10 million, harsh penalties such as long imprisonment or death, and limits the media`s access to suspected terrorists.
http://news.inq7.net/nation/index.php?index=1&story_id=52540
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 18.175.403 von peter.wedemeier1 am 07.10.05 08:35:26@ peter
schon lange kein Posting mehr von Dir gelesen.
Bist Du noch bei w:o aktiv??
gruß, confi
schon lange kein Posting mehr von Dir gelesen.
Bist Du noch bei w:o aktiv??
gruß, confi
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie eine neue Diskussion.
Meistdiskutiert
Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
---|---|---|
101 | ||
78 | ||
43 | ||
28 | ||
23 | ||
22 | ||
17 | ||
16 | ||
15 | ||
14 |
Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
---|---|---|
14 | ||
11 | ||
9 | ||
6 | ||
6 | ||
6 | ||
6 | ||
6 | ||
6 | ||
5 |