GoPro endlich an der Börse (Seite 2)
eröffnet am 26.06.14 11:14:10 von
neuester Beitrag 05.02.23 17:47:13 von
neuester Beitrag 05.02.23 17:47:13 von
Beiträge: 673
ID: 1.195.822
ID: 1.195.822
Aufrufe heute: 1
Gesamt: 75.289
Gesamt: 75.289
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: US38268T1034 · WKN: A1XE7G · Symbol: 5G5
1,4810
EUR
-6,97 %
-0,1110 EUR
Letzter Kurs 10.05.24 Tradegate
Neuigkeiten
08.02.24 · Der Aktionär TV  |
13.11.23 · Der Aktionär TV |
06.11.23 · Der Aktionär TV |
Werte aus der Branche Konsum
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 0,7420 | +59,06 | |
| 1,5800 | +32,77 | |
| 5,8800 | +28,10 | |
| 3,1180 | +13,63 | |
| 130,10 | +12,69 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 2,2200 | -9,02 | |
| 6,5500 | -9,66 | |
| 1,2000 | -10,45 | |
| 0,9100 | -11,65 | |
| 2,5400 | -23,03 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
Wahnsinn... 
https://www.finanzen.net/nachricht/aktien/bilanz-vorgelegt-g…
Aber schön, das sie aus den Hufen kommt...
running
https://www.finanzen.net/nachricht/aktien/bilanz-vorgelegt-g…
Aber schön, das sie aus den Hufen kommt...
running
Der Umsatz im Q3 hat sich gegenüber dem Q2 auf 281 Millionen Dollar glatt verdoppelt. Nach einem Verlust von noch 50 Millionen Dollar im Q3 2019 wurde nun der Break-even mit einem EBITDA-Plus von knapp 40 Millionen Dollar erreicht.
Das Weihnachtsgeschäft wird nochmal den Umsatz nach oben treiben.
Das Weihnachtsgeschäft wird nochmal den Umsatz nach oben treiben.
Das Ende von GoPro?
https://www.law360.com/california/articles/1306742
GoPro Found To Infringe Video Camera Tech Patent
By Tiffany Hu
Law360 (September 2, 2020, 10:08 PM EDT) -- GoPro Inc. was dealt a blow in its long-running patent fight against Contour IP Holding LLC when a California federal judge ruled that GoPro copied Contour's video camera technology, although he found both sides' expert opinions contained flaws.
In a redacted order Monday, U.S. District Judge William Orrick III partly granted Contour''s summary judgment motion that GoPro's camera products infringed Contour's patent, finding that GoPro's expert opinion was based on a misinterpretation of a key claim.
GoPro had argued that its expert Kevin Almeroth had stated that the products did not infringe because they did not generate video streams "from video image data," as described in the patent. The fight over the technical meanings indicated that there were still issues of material fact that precluded summary judgment, GoPro said.
But Judge Orrick was unmoved, saying this was "no battle between expert opinions" on the products' technical features. Instead, the judge said, the question was whether Almeroth's opinion was "legitimately based on the technology" over the plain meaning of the claim term, which he answered in the negative.
"Almeroth's opinion improperly deviates from the plain and ordinary meaning of the term 'from the video image data' and instead reads in a new limitation that GoPro failed to seek during claim construction in 2018 or advocate at other stages of the parties' years-long dispute," Judge Orrick wrote.
The judge said that he would leave the factual question of whether the infringement was willful to a jury, finding the issue "not appropriate for resolution on summary judgment."
Judge Orrick also granted GoPro's motion for partial summary judgment with regard to presuit damages, finding that Contour failed to sufficiently show that it had marked "substantially all" of its patented products to give GoPro notice of the infringement, the judge said.
The judge also found that Contour's damages expert Keith Ugone's opinion contained deficiencies, giving Contour until Sept. 18 to submit a supplemental report from Ugone, who may be deposed by GoPro thereafter, according to the order.
Contour's attorney, John Keville of Winston & Strawn LLP, said in a statement Wednesday that he and his client were pleased with the judge's latest rulings.
"This is a positive step forward not just for Contour, but for encouraging innovation and fostering entrepreneurship through the protection and enforcement of patents," Keville said. "We look forward to a jury trial and a favorable resolution."
In a statement to Law360, a spokesperson for GoPro said that the company's founder and CEO, Nick Woodman, was the "true inventor" of the camera technology at issue, and that the company believed that Woodman's earlier inventions would ultimately render Contour's patent claims invalid at trial.
The two companies have been battling each other since roughly 2015, when GoPro challenged two of Contour's patents after being accused of infringement.
In October 2016, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board upheld Contour's patents, concluding that neither of them were obvious in light of prior art.
When first considering the case, the PTAB said a GoPro catalog distributed at a 2009 trade show wasn't prior art as it wasn't publicly accessible. The Federal Circuit disagreed and ordered the board to reconsider whether the patents were obvious over prior art that included the catalog.
But in the end, the board's decision was the same, finding that 20 claims from each patent weren't obvious over various combinations of the catalog, another patent and a patent application.
In 2017, Judge Orrick allowed the patent infringement suit to continue, finding GoPro's bid to dismiss had come too late in the game.
The court held a video hearing last month, where GoPro urged Judge Orrick to preclude presuit damages in the case, while Contour asked the judge to find willful infringement.
The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 8,890,954 and 8,896,694.
GoPro is represented by Sean Pak of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP.
Contour is represented by John R. Keville of Winston & Strawn LLP.
The case is Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro Inc., case number 3:17-cv-04738, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
--Additional reporting by Hannah Albarazi. Editing by Jill Coffey.
https://www.law360.com/california/articles/1306742
GoPro Found To Infringe Video Camera Tech Patent
By Tiffany Hu
Law360 (September 2, 2020, 10:08 PM EDT) -- GoPro Inc. was dealt a blow in its long-running patent fight against Contour IP Holding LLC when a California federal judge ruled that GoPro copied Contour's video camera technology, although he found both sides' expert opinions contained flaws.
In a redacted order Monday, U.S. District Judge William Orrick III partly granted Contour''s summary judgment motion that GoPro's camera products infringed Contour's patent, finding that GoPro's expert opinion was based on a misinterpretation of a key claim.
GoPro had argued that its expert Kevin Almeroth had stated that the products did not infringe because they did not generate video streams "from video image data," as described in the patent. The fight over the technical meanings indicated that there were still issues of material fact that precluded summary judgment, GoPro said.
But Judge Orrick was unmoved, saying this was "no battle between expert opinions" on the products' technical features. Instead, the judge said, the question was whether Almeroth's opinion was "legitimately based on the technology" over the plain meaning of the claim term, which he answered in the negative.
"Almeroth's opinion improperly deviates from the plain and ordinary meaning of the term 'from the video image data' and instead reads in a new limitation that GoPro failed to seek during claim construction in 2018 or advocate at other stages of the parties' years-long dispute," Judge Orrick wrote.
The judge said that he would leave the factual question of whether the infringement was willful to a jury, finding the issue "not appropriate for resolution on summary judgment."
Judge Orrick also granted GoPro's motion for partial summary judgment with regard to presuit damages, finding that Contour failed to sufficiently show that it had marked "substantially all" of its patented products to give GoPro notice of the infringement, the judge said.
The judge also found that Contour's damages expert Keith Ugone's opinion contained deficiencies, giving Contour until Sept. 18 to submit a supplemental report from Ugone, who may be deposed by GoPro thereafter, according to the order.
Contour's attorney, John Keville of Winston & Strawn LLP, said in a statement Wednesday that he and his client were pleased with the judge's latest rulings.
"This is a positive step forward not just for Contour, but for encouraging innovation and fostering entrepreneurship through the protection and enforcement of patents," Keville said. "We look forward to a jury trial and a favorable resolution."
In a statement to Law360, a spokesperson for GoPro said that the company's founder and CEO, Nick Woodman, was the "true inventor" of the camera technology at issue, and that the company believed that Woodman's earlier inventions would ultimately render Contour's patent claims invalid at trial.
The two companies have been battling each other since roughly 2015, when GoPro challenged two of Contour's patents after being accused of infringement.
In October 2016, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board upheld Contour's patents, concluding that neither of them were obvious in light of prior art.
When first considering the case, the PTAB said a GoPro catalog distributed at a 2009 trade show wasn't prior art as it wasn't publicly accessible. The Federal Circuit disagreed and ordered the board to reconsider whether the patents were obvious over prior art that included the catalog.
But in the end, the board's decision was the same, finding that 20 claims from each patent weren't obvious over various combinations of the catalog, another patent and a patent application.
In 2017, Judge Orrick allowed the patent infringement suit to continue, finding GoPro's bid to dismiss had come too late in the game.
The court held a video hearing last month, where GoPro urged Judge Orrick to preclude presuit damages in the case, while Contour asked the judge to find willful infringement.
The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 8,890,954 and 8,896,694.
GoPro is represented by Sean Pak of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP.
Contour is represented by John R. Keville of Winston & Strawn LLP.
The case is Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro Inc., case number 3:17-cv-04738, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
--Additional reporting by Hannah Albarazi. Editing by Jill Coffey.
GoPro stellt auf Direktvertrieb um und streicht gut jeden fünften Job Nachrichtenagentur: dpa-AFX | 16.04.2020, 10:14 | 85 | 0 | 0 SAN MATEO (dpa-AFX) - Der Actionkamera-Spezialist GoPro will sein Geschäft nach Einbußen in der Coronavirus-Krise stärker auf den profitableren Direktvertrieb umstellen und streicht damit gut jeden fünften Job. Mehr als 200 Mitarbeiter sollen gehen, wie die kalifornische Firma in der Nacht zum Donnerstag mitteilte. Zum Stichtag 31. Dezember hatte GoPro 926 Beschäftigte. Der GoPro-Umsatz im ersten Quartal war mit 119 Millionen US-Dollar (109,5 Mio Euro) nur etwa halb so hoch wie ein Jahr zuvor, wie aus ersten Eckdaten hervorgeht. Das Vertriebsnetzwerk von GoPro sei von der Corona-Pandemie getroffen worden, sagte Gründer und Chef Nick Woodman zur Begründung. Der Stellenabbau und geringere Ausgaben für Vertrieb und Marketing sollen die Kosten in diesem Jahr um 100 Millionen Dollar senken - und 2021 um weitere 250 Millionen Dollar. In größeren europäischen Ländern habe der direkte Online-Verkauf im vergangenen Jahr bereits mehr als ein Fünftel der Erlöse eingebracht. In den USA liege der Anteil fast bei 20 Prozent. In Ländern, wo der Online-Verkauf weniger populär ist, wolle GoPro weiterhin mit großen Einzelhändlern zusammenarbeiten. Das Unternehmen hatte bereits in den vergangenen Jahren mit Verlusten zu kämpfen, Analysten zweifelten an den langfristigen Aussichten für den gesamten Actionkamera-Markt für Sportler und Abenteurer. Im Weihnachtsquartal brachte das neue Modell Hero8 der Firma aber wieder schwarze Zahlen./so/DP/jha
GoPro stellt auf Direktvertrieb um und streicht gut jeden fünften Job | wallstreet-online.de - Vollständiger Artikel unter:
https://www.wallstreet-online.de/nachricht/12409327-gopro-st…
GoPro stellt auf Direktvertrieb um und streicht gut jeden fünften Job | wallstreet-online.de - Vollständiger Artikel unter:
https://www.wallstreet-online.de/nachricht/12409327-gopro-st…
Trading Spotlight
GoPro ist für mich ganz klar ein Pleitekandidat. Ich denke vielleicht noch 2 bis 4 Quartale dann war es das. Kann natürlich sein das der Laden übernommen wird aber darauf würde ich nicht wetten.
VG G
VG G
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 62.083.028 von crackz am 05.12.19 04:52:39Läuft doch schon mal an 😊👍
Bei 3 verpasst, jetzt traue ich mich nicht, mal wieder...
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 61.677.492 von XTrack am 11.10.19 19:54:57Na da muss aber was passieren, bin gestern Abend rein ...
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 61.744.510 von MadneMax am 22.10.19 15:55:25Charttechnisch könnte bei 4$ heute die Nachfrage steigen🍀
Durchsuchen
