10 Spekulative Explorer und Minen Titel ! 8 Junior Uran Explorer+1 Silber Produzent+1 Drilling Firma - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

[SilberEagle]

Heute möchte ich mit diesem Thread mein drittes Risiko Muster Depot mit wiederum 10 Aktien von Explorer Titel eröffnen. Diesmal mit Schwerpunkt Uran Explorer, denen ich grosse Chancen einräume sich innerhalb der nächsten 12 Monate im Kurs massiv zu erhöhen!

Alle 10 Titel zusammengenommen bieten meiner Ansicht nach eine genügend ausgewogene Risiko Streuung. Jedoch AUF KEINEN FALL! nur einzelne Titel daraus!!!

Der Einsatz wird fiktiv mit ca. 1000.- Kanada Dollar CAD bei allen Titeln gleich gewichtet!

Es werden also fiktiv 10000 CAD investiert.

Die Preise sind in Kanada Dollar, und bei zwei Titeln in Australischen Dollars angegeben!

(Schlusskurse letzter Handeltag 2006, im Falle der beiden Aussi
Uran Explorer Titel der Schlusskurs von heute morgen 2. Januar 2006)

Diese Titel werden in Kanada, oder bei zwei Titeln der Fall in Australien gehandelt. Einzelne davon auch in Deutschland mit bisher zumeist nur marginalen Umsätzen! Also gefährlich illequid!!! und dadurch ist Deutschland nur sehr schlecht als Handelplatz geeignet.

Bis auf Energold *EGD*, und Impact Silver *IPT* sind alle Titel auch Junior Uran Explorer.

Zu diesem Depot gilt allgemein dasselbe was ich bereits in meinem Posting 1 bei Eröffnung meines 1. Muster Depots geschrieben habe. Speziell das zu den Risiken die ein Investment in Explorer so mit sich bringen kann. Getradet wird innerhalb dieser 12 Monate nur in fundamental begründeten Ausnahmefällen!

Also bitte Posting 1 in http://www.wallstreet-online.de/dyn/community/thread.html?th… Thread zuerst lesen, bevor munter drauflos gekauft wird!

Und falls Ihr es dann trotzdem tun solltet, macht ihr es auf Eure Gefahr, und Euer Risiko! Schlussendlich ist es Euer Geld, und nicht meins, das Ihr allenfalls gewinnt oder verliert!


ENERGOLD DRILLING CORP. (Tier1) (CDNX)



Kurs: 1.50 CAD



IMPACT SILVER CORP. (Tier1) (CDNX:IPT.V)



Kurs: 1.85 CAD



RODINIA MINERALS INC. (Tier1) (CDNX:RM.V)



Kurs: 1.23 CAD



PELE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES INC. (T (CDNX:GEM.V)

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GEM.V

Kurs: 1.00 CAD



ADELAIDE RESOURCES FPO (ASX:ADN.AX)



Kurs: 0.46 AD



MINDAX FPO (ASX:MDX.AX)



Kurs: 0.185 AD



APPALACHES RESOURCES INC (Tier1 (CDNX:APP.V)



Kurs: 0.115 CAD



ALDERSHOT RESOURCES LTD. (Tier2 (CDNX:ALZ.V)



Kurs: 0.39 CAD



FIRESTONE VENTURES INC. (Tier2) (CDNX:FV.V)



Kurs: 0.62 CAD



SANTOY RESOURCES LTD. (Tier2) (CDNX:SAN.V)



Kurs: 0.99 CAD



Hier noch der Link auf alle Tiel zum Kopieren:

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/cq?d=v1&s=EGD.V%2bIPT.V%2bRM.V%2b…

[Sebastian1988]

vielen Dank werde ich mir mal anschauen und viel Erfolg im neuen Jahr

[Boersenkuh]

Hi Silbereagle,

sehr interessant-wie bisher auch schon! Viel Glück auch in 2007

[SilberEagle]

@Boersenkuh
@Amateur16

Euch wünsche ich auch ein erfolgreiches neues Jahr

Gruss

SilberEagle

[Klardoch]

Schöner Cocktail!!

da GEM.V netterweise headliner dieses threads ist anbei noch eine recht aktuelle rückenwindige Einschätzung von Meister Roulston:

Lawrence Roulston has updated his position in the International Speculator on December 29th. His recomendations over the past 3-5 years have been nothing less than spectaculor. I will add to my position at $1.00.

I still think GEM is undervalued with it's other properties. I would not be surprised to see $1.85 in the next few weeks. Look for the first drill results to confirm the historical grades and and the revised technical report on the potential size of the deposit.

January should be an exciting month for Pele Mountain.


So soll es sein!

[SilberEagle]

Hier noch die Links auf alle Homepage der sich im Muster Depot III. befindlichen Titel!




Energold:

http://www.energold.com/s/Home.asp



Impact Silver:

http://www.impactsilver.com/s/Home.asp



Rodinia Minerals

http://www.rodiniaminerals.com/



Adelaide Resources

http://www.adelaideresources.com.au/Home.htm



Appalaches Resources

http://www.ressourcesappalaches.com/



Pele Mountain

http://pelemountain.com/index.htm



Firestone Venture

http://www.firestoneventures.com



Santoy Resources

http://www.santoy.ca/s/Projects.asp



Mindax FPO

http://www.mindax.com.au/default.aspx

[SilberEagle]

ALDERSHOT RESOURCES LTD. (Tier2 (CDNX:ALZ.V)

http://www.aldershotresources.com/

[SilberEagle]

Für´s erste sieht das doch gar nicht mal so schlecht aus!

[_MountainDew]

Mal wieder Kompliment SilberEagle! Schöne Mischung

RODINIA MINERALS - ah ja, die standen auch noch auf der Liste ( http://www.wallstreet-online.de/dyn/community/thread.html?th… )
"Ken Thorsen
Ken Thorsen, BSc Geological Engineering, P Eng, has agreed to join Rodinia’s Board of Directors and oversee the Workman Creek project. Mr. Thorsen has in excess of 40 years’ experience in base metal and uranium projects including as Project and then Senior Project geologist for SMDC (now Cameco) based in Saskatoon. Prior to retirement from a 21 year career with Teck Cominco Ltd., Mr. Thorsen held several senior positions including a two year term as President of Teck Exploration Ltd. In this position he was responsible for administration of 17 exploration offices and all field operations of the exploration department. Mr. Thorsen is currently President of Thorsen Consulting Ltd. which offers services to the mining exploration industry, and serves as a member of the board of directors of several junior mining companies. Rodinia is pleased to have Mr. Thorsen’s invaluable experience available to it for the Workman Creek project. "


...das liest man doch gern.

Viele Grüße

MountainDew
...der bei seinem Einsteig bei GEM.V zu 0,70 CAD fast schon dachte er wäre zu spät dran

[Trader007007]

[SilberEagle]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 26.644.281 von _MountainDew am 02.01.07 21:48:59

...der bei seinem Einsteig bei GEM.V zu 0,70 CAD fast schon dachte er wäre zu spät dran

MountainDew ich bin mir sicher viele potenzielle Einsteiger denken das gleiche heute bei 1.35 wie Du bei 70 Cents.

Doch das theoretische Kurs Potenzial Pele Mountains liegt in wenigen Jahren irgendwo zwischen 8.- und 10.- Dollar pro Aktie bei heutigen Uran Preisen, falls die 28 Mio. Pfund Uran Resourcen bestätigt werden. Oder sogar entsprechend mehr, wenn gar auf 50 Mio Pfund Uran ausgeweitet werden könnte.

Wer glauben sollte dies sei unmöglich sollte einmal selbst etwas rechnen. Der Fantasie sind keine Grenzen gesetzt

28 Mio. Pfund Uranium x 72.- Dollar = 2016000000.- US Dollar
28 Mio. Pfund Uranium x 85.- Dollar = 2380000000.- Us Dollar
28 Mio. Pfund Uranium x 100.- Dollar = 2800000000.- US Dollar

50 Mio. Pfund Uranium x 72.- Dollar = 3600000000.- US Dollar
50 Mio. Pfund Uranium x 85.- Dollar = 4250000000.- US Dollar
50 Mio. Pfund Uranium x 100.- Dollar = 5000000000.- US Dollar

Es gibt auch renomierte Analysten die einen noch weit höheren Uran Preis in den nächsten 5 Jahren für sehr wahrscheinlich halten!

Falls Pele Mountain diese alten bereits bestätigten Uran U3O8 Resourcen, durch jetzt angelaufene Bohrungen NI 43-101 konform wiederholen, und bestätigen kann, sind obige Rechnungsspielereien, keine Fantasie mehr, und der heutige Kurs Pele Mountains wären ein totaler Bargain.

Bei Peles 65.3 Mio. (heutiger Stand) ausgegebenen Aktien ergäbe sich bei 28 Mio. Pfund Uran U3O8 ein Anteil von 0.428 Pfund Uran pro Aktie. Bei 50 Mio. Pfund wären es 0.78 Pfund Uran pro Aktie.

Pro Tonne Gestein wird geschätzt, dass sich ca.1.03 Pfund Uran U3O8 gewinnen lassen.

Nach dem heutigen Schlusskurs von 1.35 pro Aktie wird Pele Mountain erst gerade mit 85 Mio. Ca Dollar bewertet.

Vieles am weiteren Kursverlauf hängt auch noch davon ab, wieviele zusätzliche Aktien Pele Mountain zusätzlich ausgeben muss um sich die nötigen Mittel für den weiteren Ausbau bis hin zu einer Produktion zu beschaffen.

Vorerst rechne ich damit, dass GEM.V erstmal innert weniger Monate auf ca. 3.- Dollar steigen könnte. In einer Übertreibungsphase vielleicht sogar bis zu 5 Dollar, solange der Newsflow positiv bleibt.

Höhere Preisziele wären bei weiter ansteigenden Uranpreisen, und/oder Resourcenerhöhungen Pele Mountain zu erwarten.

Falls Pele Mountain ihre Erwartungen nicht, oder nur teilweise erfüllen kann, (NI 43-101 Resourcen Bestätigung) dürfte es zu einem massiven Kursrückfall, oder im schlimmsten Fall zum Crash kommen.

Wobei wir meiner Überzeugung nach jetzt erstmal richtig nach oben drehen dürften.

Wie üblich alles ohne Gewähr!

Gruss

SilberEagle

[SilberEagle]

Wir können wohl nach diesem Tag zufrieden sein

[DAU2006]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 26.645.687 von SilberEagle am 02.01.07 23:09:28

Danke für deine ausführliche u. differenzierte Betrachtung von GEM.V! Ich finde es sehr erfreulich, dass du immer wieder auf die vorhandenen Risiken hinweist.

Vielen Dank auch für deinen damaligen Tip nahe beim Tiefstkurs (ich glaube es war Ende September).

Auf viele weitere erfreuliche Tage, Wochen, Monate u. Jahre mit Pele Mountain und einen weiter steigenden Uranpreis!

Gruß

DAU2006

PS.: sieht ja echt toll aus, dein 3er Depot nach dem 1. Tag. 5 der Werte hatte ich schon im Depot, bei den anderen werde ich schauen, was sich in den nächsten Tagen/Wochen so ergibt.

[Klardoch]

@Eagle,

dein Depot scheint ja wirklich einen beachtlichen Start hinzulegen...



heute ist dann mal ALZ.V an der Reihe mit Outperformance...zur Zeit ein Plus von 18% bei beachtlichem Volumen (über 1,5 Mill.)
...jetzt müssen nur noch die beiden Aussies zünden!

[SilberEagle]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 26.659.624 von Klardoch am 03.01.07 17:53:01

Klardoch

Die beiden australier werden wohl noch ein Weilchen in ihrer Lethargie bleiben, doch wenn das worauf ich meine Kurszielsetzung abstütze kommt, wird alles sehr schnell gehen. Die Lösung meines Rätsels lässt sich leicht lösen, wenn Du Dir die Verflechtungen, und Beteiligungsverhältnisse bei diesen beiden Titel respektive ihrer Projekte näher analysierst.

Sowas steht jedoch noch nicht zum rauskopieren bei Stockhouse.com, darum schlafen die Kurse dieser Minen vorderhand noch. Dadurch hat jeder Zeit sich günstig einzudecken. Idealer Investitionszeitraum bei beiden Titeln 1-2 Jahre.

Dass ALZ endlich loslegen musste war schon einige Zeit vorher absehbar. Dass es heute losgeht liegt sicher jedoch nicht an meiner Empfehlung, sondern an der zeit, und den Fundamentalen Daten die zu diesem (noch) microcap Titel bekannt sind.

Gruss

SilberEagle

[Klardoch]

Die beiden Kängeruhs können meinetwegen noch ein bisschen im Dornröschenschlaf weilen...muß erst noch Kapital freimachen, bin zur Zeit naturgemäß voll investiert...

Gruß
Klardoch

[Fantomas96]

Für alle Uran Interessierten hier mal den SI Uran Bull Market Report inkl. Kapitel 9 mit Bewertungen zu einigen Unternehmen (leider alles in Englisch, Stand August 2006).
Ist ein tolles Werk mit vielen Hintergrundinfos und ausführlichen Analysen, sollte man als "Neuling" , aber auch als "Uran-Fuchs" gelesen haben.




http://wecta.net/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/uranium.pdf

(Ich hoffe, der download funktioniert noch eine Weile).


Gruß,
Fantomas

[Fantomas96]

Elliott Gue über den Uranmarkt:




http://www.theaureport.com/cs/user/print/na_u/136?x-layout=2…


“Energy Strategist” Elliott Gue on Uranium
Source: The Gold Report 01/03/2007

The Gold Report caught up with Elliott Gue, Editor of “The Energy Strategist” (http://www.energystrategist.com), after a recent conference. Here Elliott shares his thoughts with us about uranium, which has skyrocketed in the past few months.

TGR: In your newsletter you said "2008 is the year the dam will break and up until then we have enough supplies of uranium." Tell me what that's all about.

GUE: It’s actually been a year that some of the producers, particularly Cameco (CCO:TSX ), have been saying that after 2008 a lot of the utilities haven’t contracted for supplies. Up until that point, they still have contracts they had signed a few years back, mainly from the late 90s, at much lower prices. And then after 2008 they don’t really have any contracted supply, and their inventories are already running a little bit low. Actually 2008 is going to prove even more interesting year than we thought because Cameco’s Cigar Lake mine flooded.

TGR: So the flooding of Cigar Lake is going have a big impact?

GUE: It’s huge. And it’s just going to accelerate because a lot of the utilities contracted for production from Cigar Lake. We know now that at the very least that is going to be delayed to sometime in the middle of 2009. Cameco, I believe, is due out in mid-February with an additional statement on that. It could well be a lot longer than that – it will be at least a year. You never know with the mining business how long it’s going to be to clean up something like that. If it turns out to be two years or three years, you could have an even bigger problem.

TGR: It was October 23rd when the Cigar Lake flooding was announced, and in your earlier writings you had brought up the possibility that something like this could happen. And now that it has happened it’s made the price of uranium go sky high.

GUE: Definitely. That has been the number-one driver since this announcement was made. They actually had a problem at that same mine maybe about eight or nine months ago when they had some flooding; it was not as major or widespread, but that caused a three- to six-month delay. And this additional year [delay] was on top of that. And so it has been an ongoing issue at all of these underground mines like that, where there are a lot of moving parts and a lot of things can go wrong.

That’s really exacerbating what was already a problem. If you look at the amount of production that was going to come out of that mine eventually when it peaked out, say two to three years after it started producing, that was going to account for something like 10% of global production, which is roughly the same in importance as Saudi Arabia is to the oil market. I think that’s just huge. Think what would happen if Saudi Arabia went down for just a week or two – it would be very, very difficult. The uranium market is a little different because a lot of it is under long-term contracts, and it’s probably not as visible in terms of daily supply and demand compared to oil or gas, but it has a similar effect. Basically there’s not enough—even the utilities who thought they had contracted enough to supply 2008 or 2009, are going to find that Cameco won’t just be able to deliver that supply until a year or two or even longer after they thought they could. And it may well be that Cigar Lake isn’t the only problematic mine out there.

TGR: You think this could be a problem with other mines?

GUE: Sure, this could happen at other places, too. I wouldn’t be surprised to see it either. But I do think that one effect that this has is that it makes the near-producers a lot more valuable. A company that’s very close to production could potentially ramp up production a little bit faster and bring up a little bit more marginal supply on line before 2009 and fill in some of the gaps left by Cigar Lake. I think that makes them a whole lot more valuable. Paladin (PDN), for example, has a mine in Africa that will be coming on line this year and should have even more production over the next few years or so. I really don’t see how the smaller companies are going to fill in all the gaps, but at least some of the gaps left by Cigar Lake could be filled in by some of these companies.

TGR: Can you talk about more of these smaller companies?

GUE: There are several good exploratory companies out there. Actually you will find that Cameco, COGEMA, or one of the big producers somewhere in the world will have a stake in these small explorers, which is a nice thing to see. Because when a big company like Cameco owns a stake in an exploration firm they have some confidence in it.

TGR: Like UNOR (UNI:TSX.V), formerly Hornby Bay, which Cameco has taken a stake in. That's on one of your recommended lists, correct?

GUE: Yes, I picked up on it by listening to the Cameco conference calls. They were talking about buying more of a stake in it. They know that area very well from an exploration standpoint. And Cameco has done this with several other companies as well; they did it with a company called UEX (UEX:TSX). They bought a sizable stake in the company and are sort of joint venturing or partnering with them for any uranium they end up ultimately producing. And for me, when you have got the biggest dedicated uranium company in the world with the smartest, and the highest paid engineers buying a stake in a small company like that, it’s at least a vote of confidence. They know the geology where they operate very, very well.

The way I played it in my newsletter is that I have what I call a "uranium field bet, where I took six, seven or eight companies that I like, and I told people that you don't have to go out and back up the truck and buy a major position in any of them. If you have even a small stake in some of these things. . .I am not looking for UNOR to go to $1; I am looking for it to go to $10. That’s an example of a stock that could go up 10 or 20 times, just as UEX did, if they’re ever able to find anything or get some positive drilling results, which gets people interested. Holding them in a basket—where you own a number of these stocks—is really the best way. You never know which mining firms are going to work out. It’s always a high-risk situation when you’re talking about exploration companies like this.

TGR: Of course.

GUE: But if you own ten of them, and if you buy them for a logical reason, you could have one or two really big winners, 10 or 20 times winners, and of course, you might have a few losers. But I certainly think that again, the key thing for me is Cameco’s stake in that company.

TGR: Can you talk about any other juniors that are particularly well-positioned?

GUE: I tell people to really concentrate more on those juniors and companies such as Exelon (NYSE:EXC) and Electricite de France (Paris: EDF)—those are the most conservative way to play it; those are basically utilities that have a lot of nuclear stake. But other explorers such as Pitchstone Exploration (PXP:TSX.V) and UNOR and UEX—those would be my favorite explorers. I really chose them for one of two reasons—either a company like Cameco had a large stake or they’re ones that are very close to production like Paladin. And the old Southern Cross, which is now called SXR Uranium One (SXR:TSX) —that’s another one that is quite close to production.

And the final sort of play that I would mention is the ability to own physical uranium by purchasing Uranium Participation Corporation (Toronto:U). As you said, you can’t just buy bars of it, and tuck it under your bed or in a safe deposit box. So, that company actually buys and holds physical quantities of uranium. I think they have upwards of 4 million pounds now, which is obviously a lot. So as that becomes more valuable, that stock tends to increase in price.

The only problem with it is, of course, is the price of the stock is capitalized a lot higher than the price of the uranium they own. I’m talking as much as a 20% premium, but you have to consider that is the only way right now to buy physical uranium, so it does have a uniqueness premium to it. Nufcor Uranium Plc, listed in London a couple of months ago, does the same exact thing.

TGR: Any more comments on where you think the big excitement is in this sector right now? The Cigar Lake situation seems to be the biggest development, and the juniors near production getting the benefit of that seems to be where a lot of the movement is.

GUE: I think that’s exactly the right take on it. I think that prior to this whole thing with Cigar Lake, a lot of people said, “I like the uranium story; I think it’s compelling; I like the nuclear power idea.” And then, what would they then go out and buy? Well, they would go out and buy one of two things, at least the people I have spoken to, anyway. They would go and buy Cameco because it’s big and it trades on the New York Stock Exchange. Or they would buy maybe BHP or one of those companies in Australia that sort of does it as part of their broader business of metal, metal mining. That would be one of the two ways they would go: either buy BHP Billiton (BHP:NYSE), which is not a pure play, or buy Cameco.

But with Cameco’s problem, people are saying, “Okay, well, that not only exposed the problem at Cigar Lake, but it also exposed more widely to the public their problem with these legacy contracts, which they signed four to five years ago, and the fact that in a $60 market, or $63 market, they’re still earning $21, $23 on a lot of these contracts on an average.

TGR: And these contracts go out how much longer?

GUE: That’s kind of unclear. The way management describes it they have had a long-term policy, which was born in that era of really falling uranium prices, where they would contract about half of their production, and the way they would do it is they would roll contracts over time. So, they would sign a few contracts in one year and in the next year they would sign a few more, so there’s going to be a gradual process when these contracts sort of roll off. I know it will probably take about five years for them to start clearing out, but the problem is that the contracts they signed two years ago were in the upper $20s, and would have been considered a premium contract at the time. That’s now less than half the market, so even contracts that are two years old that maybe lasted for five to seven years; those are still going to be well under the marketplace unless the price starts to drop, which I just don’t see happening. So, it’s going to take a long time for some of these contracts to roll off over time.

The other thing that bothered me in listening to their last couple of calls is that the utilities are requesting longer-term contracts. Now, they want to go out and sign a 10, 15 or 20-year contract for supply. I don’t think that they have done a lot of that yet. Typically when they sign these long-term contracts because they’re the biggest producer up there, they were able to get a price that is a premium to the spot price. And I think what’s happening is that these utilities are offering them levels of premiums that are much, much larger, to try and induce them to sign a 10- to 15-year supply contract. And so the worry is if they sign something like that and uranium prices do go to $110, then they’re left selling uranium at $50 or $60.

And it just seems to me that is one problem with Cameco, whereas the smaller companies that are just coming out; oftentimes, they’ve only contracted a portion of their production, which means maybe they’re going to sell some of it on the spot or they’re going to use short-term contracts. And I think they will end up getting a realized price much closer to the current price. So, I think that the Cigar Lake flood has brought all these problems with Cameco much more into focus.

The other interesting trend I notice was from late November is that one of the companies to recommend is a company called EMC Energy Metals (EMU:NYSE). They just listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol EMU. They are a junior as well, fairly close to production. That's another thing to bring into the curve where more U.S. investors can get involved; that’s going to help out a lot of these stocks.

TGR: The fact that they listed on the New York.

GUE: Right. Most of my subscribers I have trained pretty well, but sometimes they have to go to Canada to get the best deal, but to the wider public, oftentimes I’ve found that they just don’t want to hear about it unless they can buy it easily in the U.S. One of the only ones that traded in the U.S. before that I have also recommended a few times is a Bulletin Board stock—Uranium Resources (URRE). Since it's a bulletin board stock, and that scares a lot of people. They’re actually a producer, out of the Southwest—Texas and New Mexico, not particularly low cost producer. I don’t know how they’ve managed to survive all these years when uranium prices were so depressed. But somehow they’ve managed it; the stock has been very, very volatile. They had problems with one of their mines; they did a reverse split earlier this year. So, there have been some issues with them, but the fact is they do produce and deliver uranium in a market that is very attractive. So ultimately I think if they’re able to go through with some of the expansion projects that they’ve outlined, there is a potential for them to increase their production over the next few years even higher. It’s a domestic source of uranium, which has some benefits. So I think that’s another interesting, if high risk, play.

TGR: Right. I think people would go into this knowing that there’s a certain risk element to show in the basket and so spread the risk.

GUE: Exactly. I would put companies such as Paladin and SXR as the least risky of the juniors because they’re more established, and I would put companies like UNOR and Pitchstone and other companies that are more exploration oriented at the riskier edge of it, but basically, with any small mining company, not much has to go wrong before you have a problem.

TGR: Yes, the repercussions can be severe.

GUE: And with that you get a lot higher potential.

TGR: Hence the risk/reward dilemma. Thank you Elliott, for your time.




Gruß,
Fantomas

[Fantomas96]

Analysts remain bullish on outlook for uranium after nearly doubling in 2006

Sun Jan 7, 12:58 PM

By Craig Wong

VANCOUVER (CP) - After nearly doubling last year, the price of uranium appears poised to continue its bull run in 2007 as demand for the radioactive fuel continues to outstrip supply, analysts say.

"It is a commodity that has for years been under a lot of pressure from excess supply and now the seeds have been sown and we're beginning to see the flip side of that," said RBC Capital Markets analyst Adam Schatzker, who has forecast the price will average US$100 per pound in 2007.

"There is not a lot of mine production. The inventories that were being sold into the market are disappearing and we're actually in a supply-demand deficit."

Though hedge funds and other speculators are beginning to move into the uranium market, he said the biggest driver to the recent increase in price is a shortfall in supply and growing demand.

New nuclear power plants are being built in China and other parts of the world, while few new major deposits have been developed, leading to demand that is 40 per cent ahead of current supply.

For years the price of uranium removed the incentive to spend the money building any new production or searching for new deposits. With governments selling their inventories the markets were flooded with cheap uranium and there was no need to dig up new deposits.

But those inventories are depleting and uranium users still need the fuel for their reactors.

The price of uranium averaged US$28.15 per pound in 2005 and jumped to and average of $48.10 per pound in 2006. However the spot price for the radioactive metal was a whopping US$72 per pound at the end of the year.

Scotiabank commodity specialist Patricia Mohr has suggested that the current upswing in uranium prices is a "secular" change in global energy markets, due to the price of oil and that nuclear power generation emits virtually no greenhouse gases.

"While exploration activity has surged for uranium - across Canada, Australia, Africa and in Kazakhstan - there has been little improvement in mine production," Mohr wrote in a recent report forecasting an average price of US$80 in 2007, ending the year close to $90.

She suggested mine production gains this year will be limited as Cameco (CCO.TO) and Areva will likely boost output in Kazakhstan, the Dominion project will start up in South Africa and Smith Ranch may be expanded in the United States.

The shortfall in supply was made worse when Saskatoon-based Cameco, the world's biggest uranium producer, reported flooding at its Cigar Lake mine in northern Saskatchewan, a project it had hoped to bring into production in 2008.

Construction at the deposit, which has proven and probable reserves of more than 232 million pounds of uranium at an average grade of 19 per cent, began in January 2005, but came to a halt last year after a flood that pushed back completion by at least a year.

Though the company has started round-the-clock work drilling holes to the source of the water inflow so it can pump in concrete, it is not known when the mine will actually be able to come into production.

Some market watchers have speculated that the Cigar Lake mine may never begin commercial production.

Schatzker said the flood at the mine that is expected to produce 18 million pounds a year when it comes does come into production, had a "fundamental impact on the market."

"The range of expectations of where that might go is all over the place because really a lack of information and a lack of clarity," he said.

But even with the trouble, Salman Partners analyst Raymond Goldie still rated Cameco a top pick for the year.

"We believe that investors have been overly concerned about the link between oil prices and uranium prices and about the flood at Cameco's Cigar Lake uranium project," said Goldie, who has a C$55.95 12-month price target on the stock.

"However, as investors realize that what Cameco loses at Cigar Lake on volume, it more than makes up on price, Cameco's share price continues to recover."

Investors have been flocking to uranium stocks, particularly those of junior companies with a lower stock price.

For example, Paladin Resources Ltd. (PDN.TO), a small Australian miner that trades on the TSX and has uranium properties in South Africa, has been a top trading stock for several weeks on the Canadian markets.

SxR Uranium One Inc. (SXR.TO), a Toronto-based resources company, has also been a popular investment as has been Denison Mines Corp. (DML.TO), an intermediate uranium producer, with mining assets in the Athabasca Basin of Saskatchewan, and the southwestern U.S. as well as exploration properties in the U.S., Canada and Mongolia.

Investors have been drawn to Denison because the company owns parts of two of the four uranium mills operating in North America today, giving the company a diversified mining asset base as well as milling infrastructure.

The Toronto company recently got C$100 million in financing to back its bid to acquire OmegaCorp Ltd., an Australian-traded miner with uranium projects in southern Africa, including the advanced stage Kariba Project in Zambia.



Gruß,
Fantomas

[Klardoch]

Heute mal wieder ein eher schwachbrüstiger Markt....dafür darf APP.V gut aussehen!

[Dere]

Press Release Source: Santoy Resources Ltd.


Santoy Announces Otish Mountain Uranium Joint Venture
Tuesday January 9, 12:08 pm ET


VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--(CCNMatthews - Jan. 9, 2007) - Santoy Resources Ltd. (TSX VENTURE:SAN - News) and Melkior Resources Inc. (TSX VENTURE:MKR - News; The Companies) are pleased to announce that they have agreed to enter into a joint venture to explore for Uranium and other metals in the Otish Mountains of Quebec. Melkior has retained the right to explore for diamonds for its own account on the joint venture lands.
ADVERTISEMENT


Melkior is contributing 214 claims totaling 11,329 hectares that the company either currently holds or has under application. An additional 406 claims totaling approximately 21,105 hectares have been applied for on behalf of the joint venture- for a total area of 32,434 hectares. The map staking costs of these additional claims will be funded by Santoy. Further property acquisitions and future exploration expenditures in the Otish Mountain district will be funded equally by the Companies.

Jens Hansen, CEO, states, "Melkior is pleased to be able to participate with Santoy, a company with recognized uranium exploration expertise which is currently active in the Athabasca Basin in Saskatchewan, the Central Mineral Belt of Labrador and British Columbia." Ron Netolitzky, CEO of Santoy, says that the Company is pleased to be able to add exposure to the Otish Mountain uranium play to its expanding portfolio of energy prospects, especially with a partner experienced in operating in Quebec.

The Otish area of northern Quebec has recently become the focus of very active uranium exploration. Cameco Corporation has a large land position in the area and Strateco Resources Inc. has been reporting significant uranium values from their Matoush discovery. The uranium potential of the Otish Sedimentary Basin has been favorably compared to that of the Athabasca Basin.

This news release has been prepared by the Companies jointly and is issued under the technical qualifications of Jens Hansen P.Eng., President of Melkior and a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101.

About Santoy Resources Ltd.

Santoy Resources Ltd. is a Canadian mining exploration company focused primarily on the energy sector. Emphasis is being placed on uranium projects in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and the Central Mineral Belt of Labrador; and on coal and coal bed methane in Western Canada. A description of our properties, including maps and photographs, can be viewed on the Company's website at www.santoy.ca.

On Behalf of the Board of Directors

SANTOY RESOURCES LTD.

Ron Netolitzky, President

Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information

[DAU2006]

Impact Silver News (heute nachbörslich):

Impact acquires seven Zacatecas silver concessions

Impact Silver Corp (C:IPT)
Shares Issued 39,453,188
Last Close 1/9/2007 $1.74
Tuesday January 09 2007 - News Release

Mr. Frederick Davidson reports

IMPACT ACQUIRES SEVEN SILVER CONCESSIONS IN ZACATECAS

Impact Silver Corp. has purchased 100-per-cent interests in a further seven silver concessions in the historic Zacatecas mining district in Mexico. Highlights of these acquisitions are as follows:

- the Leo and Milagro Concessions cover a splay off the major Canterra vein in the southern part of the Zacatecas silver district;

- the Cancer concession is located in the eastern part of the district and covers a 500-metre length of the historic Providencia vein marked by numerous old mine workings.

- the Martin and Santo Cristo concessions are located near Impact's Cristian concession where earlier sampling of old mine dumps returned 310 grams per tonne silver, 24.2 per cent lead and 8.0 per cent zinc from a high-grade stockpile and 93 g/t silver, 0.43 per cent lead and 1.4 per cent zinc from a low-grade waste dump; and

- other concessions purchased cover portions of mineralized veins in various parts of the district.

All of these acquired concessions in the general Zacatecas district represent potential future feed for the 200-tonne-per-day Zacatecas processing plant under option to Impact.

A geological team commenced fieldwork on the four Zacatecas venture properties with Yale Resources in December, 2006, and will begin work on the 100-per-cent Impact properties in early 2007. These programs will include mapping and detailed sampling of the historic workings and old mine dumps as well as prepare for a multiproperty drill program planned for first quarter 2007.

Impact continues to execute its strategy to grow into a mid-tier silver producer through an aggressive development and acquisition program focused on Mexican silver assets. With these transactions Impact will have interest in 15 mineral concessions in the Zacatecas silver district. George Gorzynski, PEng, a qualified person under the meaning of Canadian National Instrument 43-101, is responsible for the technical content of this news release. Rock samples were collected from dumps beside old mine workings. All samples were shipped to the ALS Chemex preparation laboratory in Guadalajara, Mexico, where they were fine crushed (70 per cent passing a two-millimetre screen), pulverized (85 per cent passing a 75-micron screen) and pulp split-separated for assay by a riffle splitter. These pulps were shipped to the ALS Chemex laboratory in North Vancouver, Canada, where a 30-gram split of each was assayed for gold and silver by standard fire assay and a 10-gram split was analyzed for an additional 30 elements by ICP spectrometry.

© 2007 Canjex Publishing Ltd.

[Panem]

Ausgewogen!
Spannend!
Solide!


Rodinia ist stark.
Pele hat unglaubliche Fantasie.
Alder ist günstig.

Und Adelaide verwirrt mich ein wenig: WAS genau haben die unter Kontrolle?

Mit WEM und für wie viel?


Excellente Arbeit, wie immer.

PS: Pele wird sofort gekauft, wenn Uranium Exploration Australia nicht überzeugt.

[Panem]

Australien hat sich entschieden:

Ich kaufe ein paar Gemmen, denn Gold ist auch dabei!

Und wer in so jungen Jahren für Brasilien schon eine WM spielt, kann so viel nicht falsch machen...

[Panem]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 26.804.554 von Panem am 10.01.07 01:35:30

Nach 3 Stunden Research hat sich zudem ergeben:

Wenn schon Marathon, dann auch Adelaide - man ist ja in guter Nachbarschaft.

[Mr_Friedl]

Hmm hoffentlich geht das jetzt nicht so weiter wie in den letzten 2 Tagen :rolleyes

Wurde eigentlich erwähnt wann man mit den News für die Bestätigung der Bohrungsergebnisse rechnet ?
Oda weiß jemand wie lange sowas dauert?

Lg Friedl

[Mr_Friedl]

ups falsches Forum!
Die Frage bezieht sich auf Pele Mountain!

Lg Friedl

[Klardoch]

Neues von ALDERSHOT


Aldershot gets Kariba prospecting licence, surveys


2007-01-11 13:55 ET - News Release

Mr. Jeremy Caddy reports

URANIUM - ZAMBIAN PROSPECTING LICENCE GRANTED

According to Aldershot Resources Ltd., further to its news releases in Stockwatch dated Feb. 18, 2005, and April 12, 2005, the Kariba prospecting licence has now been granted. The Kariba prospecting licence (LSPL310) is located in the southern province of Zambia and on the northern shores of Lake Kariba.

The Kariba prospecting licence covers approximately 780 square kilometres and is almost entirely underlain by the Carboniferous- to Jurassic-aged Karoo supergroup on the edge of the mid-Zambezi rift valley. Potential for sandstone-hosted uranium deposits within the Upper Karoo escarpment grit (both as detrital deposits and fracture/fault-controlled mineralization) has been recognized in this area and the area was actively explored in the 1970s and early 1980s by international companies. The company's prospecting licence lies south of the Mutanga, Dibwe, Bungua and Njame prospects and east of the Chisebuka and Munyumbwe prospects.

In September, 2006, a JORC-compliant (joint ore reserves committee) inferred resource estimate of 16.4 million tonnes at 380 parts per million U3O8 at a 200-part-per-million U3O8 cut-off was reported (ASX, Omega Corp.'s quarterly report) for the Mutanga and Dibwe areas with the Dibwe prospect approximately 15 to 23 kilometres (10 to 15 miles) north of Aldershot's prospecting licence. In addition, recent exploration by Energy Venture Ltd.'s subsidiary, African Energy Resources Ltd., over the Njame North deposit (58 km or 36 miles to the northeast) has identified a JORC-compliant inferred resource of 5.5 million tonnes at 400 parts per million U3O8 (200-part-per-million U3O8 cut-off) containing 2,200 tonnes or 4.8 million pounds of U3O8 (ASX report dated Sept. 19, 2006). The above results have not be validated by the company and do not comply with National Instrument 41-103 reporting requirements and should not be interpreted as such, and are reported only to show the potential of the area and identify mineralized zones that can reasonably be expected to extend onto the company's ground. These statements have been compiled by Ian Faris who is the company's vice-president of exploration.

Management is excited to have this licence approved as it contains approximately 100 km of the prospective Upper Karoo escarpment grit host to uranium mineralization with published uranium resources along strike to the northeast and known prospects about three km to the west of its boundary. Data compilation has commenced and an airborne survey will be undertaken once a contract is finalized and the conditions are suitable.

We seek Safe Harbor.

[1Peters1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 26.844.899 von Klardoch am 11.01.07 23:02:15

Guten Morgen Allerseits,
Danke Euch allen für den interessanten Thread. Wenn Ihr wieder fit seid bitte ich um eine Erklärung zum Unterschied zwischen Tier 1 & Tier 2 .
Danke im voraus

1Peters1

[SilberEagle]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 26.847.572 von 1Peters1 am 12.01.07 04:12:16

Tier 1 - Tier Maintenance Requirements

To maintain a listing on Tier 1, an Issuer must meet all Tier 1 TMR for its industry segment.

These requirements are set out below.

3.1 Shareholder Distribution – A Tier 1 Issuer must have:
(a) at least 750,000 Listed Shares in the Public Float;
(b) at least 150 Public Shareholders holding at least one Board Lot, each free of
Resale Restrictions; and
(c) at least 10% of the Listed Shares in the Public Float.
3.2 Market Capitalization – The Public Float of a Tier 1 Issuer must have a Market Value
of at least $750,000.
3.3 Net Tangible Assets/Property – A Tier 1 Issuer must meet the following Net Tangible
Asset or property standards:
(a) Technology or Industrial Issuer - Net Tangible Assets exceeding $1,000,000 or
positive pre-tax earnings;
(b) Mining Issuer – a material interest in a Tier 1 Property;
(c) Oil and Gas Issuer - at least $1,000,000 in proven and probable reserves, of
which at least $500,000 must be proven;
(d) Research and Development Issuer - Net Tangible Assets exceeding $2,000,000;
and
(e) Real Estate or Investment Issuer - Net Tangible Assets exceeding $2,000,000.
3.4 Working Capital – A Tier 1 Issuer must meet the following minimum Working Capital
standards:
(a) Technology or Industrial Issuer - sufficient Working Capital or Financial
Resources to maintain operations for 12 months;
(b) Mining Issuer – sufficient Working Capital or Financial Resources to maintain
operations and keep Principal Properties in good standing for 12 months;
(c) Oil and Gas Issuer – sufficient Working Capital or Financial Resources to
maintain operations for 12 months;
(d) Real Estate or Investment Issuer - sufficient Working Capital or Financial
Resources to maintain operations for 12 months; and

POLICY 2.5 TIER MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS Page 4
(as at January 2, 2004) AND INTER-TIER MOVEMENT

(e) Research and Development Issuer - sufficient Working Capital to maintain
operations for 12 months.
3.5 Activity – A Tier 1 Issuer must meet the following minimum activity standards:
(a) a demonstration of positive cash flow; or
(b) at least $1,000,000 in operating revenues in the previous 12 months; or
(c) at least $200,000 on expenditures directly related to development of assets during
the previous 12 months.
3.6 Assets and Operations – To maintain a listing on Tier 1, an Issuer must not:
(a) substantially reduce or impair its principal operating assets;
(b) cease to be an operating Issuer, or
(c) discontinue a substantial portion of its operations or business for any reason.

4. Tier 2 – Tier Maintenance Requirements

To maintain a listing as an active Tier 2 Issuer, an Issuer must meet all Tier 2 TMR for its
industry segment.

These requirements are set out below.

4.1 Shareholder Distribution – A Tier 2 Issuer must have:
(a) at least 300,000 Listed Shares in the Public Float;
(b) at least 150 Public Shareholders holding at least one Board Lot each, free of
Resale Restrictions; and
(c) at least 10% of the Listed Shares in the Public Float.
4.2 Market Capitalization – The Public Float of a Tier 2 Issuer must have a Market Value
of at least $100,000.
4.3 Net Tangible Assets/Property – A Tier 2 Issuer must meet the following Net Tangible
Asset or property standards:
(a) Technology or Industrial Issuer – Net Tangible Assets exceeding $100,000;
(b) Real Estate or Investment Issuer - Net Tangible Assets exceeding $250,000; and
(c) Research and Development Issuer - Net Tangible Assets exceeding $250,000.

POLICY 2.5 TIER MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS Page 5
(as at January 2, 2004) AND INTER-TIER MOVEMENT

4.4 Working Capital – A Tier 2 Issuer must meet the following minimum Working Capital
standards:
(a) Technology or Industrial Issuer - adequate Working Capital and Financial
Resources to cover six months of operations pursuant to the business plan, being
an amount of at least $50,000;
(b) Mining or Oil and Gas Issuer - adequate Working Capital and Financial
Resources to maintain operations and cover general and administrative expenses
for six months, being an amount of at least $50,000;
(c) Real Estate or Investment Issuer - adequate Working Capital and Financial
Resources to cover six months of operations pursuant to the business plan, being
an amount of at least $50,000;
(d) Research and Development Issuer - adequate Working Capital to cover six
months of the recommended research and development program, being an amount
of at least $50,000.
The Exchange will not generally require a Tier 2 Issuer to transfer its listing to NEX
solely because it does not meet the minimum Working Capital requirements.
4.5 Activity – A Tier 2 Issuer must maintain the following activity standards:
(a) Technology, Industrial, Real Estate or Investment Issuer
(i) demonstration of positive cash flow; or
(ii) significant operating revenues in the previous 12 months; or
(iii) at least $100,000 on expenditures directly related to the development of
assets in the previous 12 months;
(b) Mining or Oil and Gas Issuer
(i) significant operating revenues or positive cash flow in the previous 12
months; or
(ii) at least $50,000 on exploration or development of the Issuer’s Principal
Properties in the previous 12 months
(c) Research and Development Issuer
(i) significant operating revenues in the previous 12 months; or
(ii) at least $100,000 on expenditures directly related to the development of
assets in the previous 12 months.

[kain]

wo sich schon einige (uran) experten hier blicken lassen möchte ich euch fragen
was hält ihr von arafura

im nächsten monat bekommt man ja für 3 aktien jeweils 1 von nupower
(mit verschiedenen uranprojekten) die dann im märz auf asx gelistet wird
vielleicht lohnt sich jetzt umso mehr auf aru blick zu werfen?

und

welche 2 werte haben ihrer meinung nach den grössten potenzial:
aldershot
marathon
canalaska
eso
arafura
santoy
melkior

danke

[SilberEagle]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 26.868.648 von kain am 12.01.07 19:40:21

Arafura bietet ein sehr gutes Risiko/Chancen Verhältnis, und dürfte beim Wegfall der australischen Restriktionen was den Uranabbau angeht zusätzlich stark profitieren.

[1Peters1]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 26.847.729 von SilberEagle am 12.01.07 04:42:14

Danke Silber Eagle.
Ich brauch dazu etwas länger um alles richtig zu verstehen.
Noch schöne WE-Stunden
1Peters1

[DAU2006]

Heute war bei Energold das größte gehandelte Volumen des letzten Jahres. Alle großen Pakete wurden über Scotia gekauft (insgesamt 290.000 Stück). Da scheint sich wohl jemand in großem Stil vor dem nächsten Kursschub eingekauft zu haben.

Bin schon auf die nächsten Tage gespannt.

V 2007-01-15 14:39:11 1.50 0.05 50,000 85 Scotia 57 Interactive K

V 2007-01-15 14:39:18 1.50 0.05 50,000 85 Scotia 57 Interactive K

V 2007-01-15 14:38:51 1.50 0.05 30,000 85 Scotia 57 Interactive K

V 2007-01-15 14:38:21 1.50 0.05 20,000 85 Scotia 57 Interactive K

V 2007-01-15 14:38:27 1.50 0.05 20,000 85 Scotia 57 Interactive K

V 2007-01-15 14:38:32 1.50 0.05 20,000 85 Scotia 57 Interactive K

V 2007-01-15 14:38:38 1.50 0.05 20,000 85 Scotia 57 Interactive K

V 2007-01-15 14:38:45 1.50 0.05 20,000 85 Scotia 57 Interactive K

V 2007-01-15 15:49:30 1.51 0.06 20,000 85 Scotia 57 Interactive K

V 2007-01-15 14:37:58 1.50 0.05 10,000 85 Scotia 141 Bolder K

V 2007-01-15 14:39:07 1.50 0.05 10,000 85 Scotia 57 Interactive K

V 2007-01-15 14:45:09 1.50 0.05 10,000 85 Scotia 57 Interactive K

V 2007-01-15 15:49:23 1.51 0.06 10,000 85 Scotia 57 Interactive K

Gruß

DAU2006

PS.: auch bei Impact Silver heute ein ansprechendes Volumen (trotz US-Feiertag)

[Klardoch]

Press Release Source: Appalaches Resources Inc.


Ressources Appalaches/Ashini Property: Two New Pegmatite Veins With Uranium
Tuesday January 16, 10:00 am ET


RIMOUSKI, QUEBEC--(CCNMatthews - Jan. 16, 2007) - Ressources Appalaches (TSX VENTURE:APP - News) announces the discovery of two more uranium-bearing pegmatite veins on the Ashini property in Quebec. The Company has received analytical results that range from 603 to 985 ppm uranium from two new pegmatite veins in addition to receiving the results from three re-analyzed samples on the first two discovered veins that contain 745 ppm, 923 ppm and 609 ppm U (Press Release of December 4, 2006).
These new results were obtained from samples taken from four surface areas that were stripped in the autumn of 2006. Vein #1, the northernmost vein is located approximately 1.7 Kms from vein #2 which is in turn located 2.3 Kms to the north of the new veins #3 and 4. Results obtained to date from the four veins are as follows :




Uranium Uranium
(ppm) (%)
Vein #1 2230 0,22
923 0,09
745 0,07
390 0,03
325 0,03
145 0,01
Vein #2 609 0,06
593 0,06
Vein #3 603 0,06
Vein #4 907 0,09
985 0,09


Vein #1 is sub-horizontal. It is approximately 3 metres thick and has been so far traced over a strike lenght of 15 metres. Vein #2 is vertical, varies from 0.3 to 1.5 metres in thickness, and has been traced for 16 metres along surface. Vein #3 is also vertical, with a thickness between 3.0 and 5.0 metres and an explosed lenght of 14 metres. Vein #4 is exposed over 15 metres with a thickness of 2 metres and is sub-horizontal. All veins remain open at both ends.

The property is located 20 Kms directly north of Godbout, Quebec and is easily accessed by forestry roads. A major geological structure, over 50 Kms long and identified by a strong magnetic anomaly traverses the property. The Company's properties in the area cover approximately 20 Kms along the regional structure. Ressource Appalache's 5 properties (279 claims) cover an area of approximately 160 Km2

The samples were analyzed by several multi-element methods at ALS Chemex (ME-XRF05 and ME-MS61r) or at Actlabs (FUS-MS and DNC).

The contents of this press release were prepared by Alain Hupé, Geologist and NI-43-101 Qualified Person. The TSX Venture Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.


und

Issuer Name: Pele Mountain Res Inc.
TSX-V Ticker Symbol: GEM
Time of Halt: 9:00 EST
Reason for Halt: Pending News


Gruß
Klardoch

[URANI]

This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Here is a sample of this item:

Pele Mountain halted at 5:59 a.m. PT


2007-01-16 09:01 ET - Halt Trading

[SilberEagle]

Gestern nach dieser Meldung ein Plus von 25.93%!!!

http://biz.yahoo.com/ccn/070116/200701160367292001.html?.v=1

Press Release Source: Appalaches Resources Inc

Ressources Appalaches/Ashini Property: Two New Pegmatite Veins With Uranium

Tuesday January 16, 10:00 am ET


RIMOUSKI, QUEBEC--(CCNMatthews - Jan. 16, 2007) - Ressources Appalaches (TSX VENTURE:APP - News) announces the discovery of two more uranium-bearing pegmatite veins on the Ashini property in Quebec. The Company has received analytical results that range from 603 to 985 ppm uranium from two new pegmatite veins in addition to receiving the results from three re-analyzed samples on the first two discovered veins that contain 745 ppm, 923 ppm and 609 ppm U (Press Release of December 4, 2006).
These new results were obtained from samples taken from four surface areas that were stripped in the autumn of 2006. Vein #1, the northernmost vein is located approximately 1.7 Kms from vein #2 which is in turn located 2.3 Kms to the north of the new veins #3 and 4. Results obtained to date from the four veins are as follows :



Uranium Uranium
(ppm) (%)
Vein #1 2230 0,22
923 0,09
745 0,07
390 0,03
325 0,03
145 0,01
Vein #2 609 0,06
593 0,06
Vein #3 603 0,06
Vein #4 907 0,09
985 0,09

Vein #1 is sub-horizontal. It is approximately 3 metres thick and has been so far traced over a strike lenght of 15 metres. Vein #2 is vertical, varies from 0.3 to 1.5 metres in thickness, and has been traced for 16 metres along surface. Vein #3 is also vertical, with a thickness between 3.0 and 5.0 metres and an explosed lenght of 14 metres. Vein #4 is exposed over 15 metres with a thickness of 2 metres and is sub-horizontal. All veins remain open at both ends.

The property is located 20 Kms directly north of Godbout, Quebec and is easily accessed by forestry roads. A major geological structure, over 50 Kms long and identified by a strong magnetic anomaly traverses the property. The Company's properties in the area cover approximately 20 Kms along the regional structure. Ressource Appalache's 5 properties (279 claims) cover an area of approximately 160 Km2

The samples were analyzed by several multi-element methods at ALS Chemex (ME-XRF05 and ME-MS61r) or at Actlabs (FUS-MS and DNC).

The contents of this press release were prepared by Alain Hupé, Geologist and NI-43-101 Qualified Person. The TSX Venture Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.



Contact:
Andre Proulx
Appalaches Resources Inc.
President
418-724-0901
[e-mail]
www.ressourcesappalaches.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Appalaches Resources Inc.

[_MountainDew]

Pele Mountain Reports NI 43-101 Mineral Resource of 33 Million Pounds Uranium Oxide at Elliot Lake
Tuesday, January 16 2007


Symbol: GEM
Listing: TSX Venture Exchange
Common Shares Outstanding: 65,724,360


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

January 16, 2007 - Toronto - Pele Mountain Resources Inc. (TSX Venture: GEM) ("Pele" or the "Company") announced today that it has received and filed on SEDAR a NI 43-101 compliant Technical Report (the "Report")on its Elliot Lake uranium project (the "Project") in northern Ontario, authored by Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. ("Scott Wilson RPA"), dated January 15, 2007. Highlights of the Report include:

- A mineral resource estimate of 30.05 million tonnes grading 0.050-percent uranium oxide (U3O8), or 1.0 pound per short ton, for a total inferred resource containing 33.05-million pounds U3O8 (based on a cut-off grade1 of 0.03-percent U3O8 and a minimum mining width of 2.44 metres, or 8 feet). The mineral resource estimate is based on a database of 70 drill holes in the Main Conglomerate Bed. Drill hole spacing was variable, mostly in the order of 100 m to 400 m. The resource estimate used a nearest neighbour block model method, equivalent to a polygonal method.

- Very good potential to increase the mineral resources in drill-tested extensions of the Main Conglomerate Bed that could contain a potential mineral deposit of 25 to 30 million tonnes at grades ranging from 0.04% U3O8 to 0.05% U3O82
Additional resource potential in the mineralized Basal and Upper conglomerate beds and in the lower-grade hanging wall of the Main Conglomerate Bed.
Scott Wilson RPA has included in the Report recommendations for a two-stage program to advance the Project through a preliminary feasibility study.

- The first stage includes an economic analysis of the potential viability of mineral resources (a preliminary assessment) and calls for additional data compilation, mapping, drilling, metallurgical and leach testing, and resource modeling, along with early-stage studies of permitting requirements and of mine development and processing options. Estimated costs of the first-stage program are $830,000.
- Upon the successful completion of the first stage, a preliminary feasibility study will be undertaken as a comprehensive study of the viability of mineral resources. Estimated costs of the second-stage program are $4.5-million.
Scott Wilson RPA has also included in the Report recommendations to pursue additional opportunities to increase project revenue and decrease costs for a potential uranium mining and processing operation. These four key opportunities involve assessments of:

- The technical and economic viability of recovering Rare Earth Oxides and the production of marketable products.
- The mining and underground leaching of the lower grade mineralization in the hanging wall of the Main Conglomerate Bed.
- The viability of using surface heap leaching as an alternative to conventional milling.
- The potential to mine higher grade, near-surface portions of the deposit early in the project life.

Pele President and CEO Al Shefsky stated, "This Report transforms Pele Mountain Resources. It has advanced our Elliot Lake project to the evaluation stage, outlining an inferred mineral resource with an in-situ value well in excess of C$2.5-billion and very good potential for expansion. Our shareholders now own a 100-percent interest in a vast resource of uranium oxide at a time when global demand is surging at an unprecedented rate. We are committed to advancing the Project systematically according to the roadmap provided in the Scott Wilson RPA Report. A drill crew and technical personnel have been mobilized to the Project to begin implementation of its recommendations."



Please see Pele's website at www.pelemountain.com, or www.sedar.com to view the Report.

This press release has been reviewed and approved by Robert MacGregor, P.Eng., an independent Qualified Person with 14 years experience working in the Elliot Lake area during its time as an active uranium mining camp. Any disclosure in this press release pertaining to the Report has been reviewed and approved by Lawrence B. Cochrane, Ph.D., P. Eng. and William E. Roscoe, Ph.D, P. Eng., the authors of the Scott Wilson RPA Report, each being a "Qualified Person" under NI 43-101.

About Pele Mountain Resources

Pele Mountain Resources is focused on the advancement of its 100-percent owned Elliot Lake uranium project in northern Ontario. The Elliot Lake project hosts a NI 43-101 compliant mineral resource of 33 million pounds of U3O8 with very good potential to increase the mineral resources on the property, according to a Technical Report authored by Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.

The Elliot Lake mining camp was once known as "the uranium capital of the world" and has produced more than 270 million pounds of U3O8 from stratigraphically-bound deposits that demonstrate remarkable consistency over extensive areas. The uranium market is currently experiencing a strong upward price trend due to uncertain supply and increasing global demand.

Pele also holds a diverse portfolio of gold, diamond, and base metal projects located across northern Ontario, including the Highland project where drilling has outlined several high-grade, narrow-vein gold zones within an historic mining camp. Through project generation and mineral discovery, Pele provides shareholders with exposure and leverage to the increasing global demand for natural resources. Pele stock trades on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol "GEM".

For further information please contact Al Shefsky, President, at [phone], or visit the Pele website at www.pelemountain.com.

1 Assumptions used in determining cut off grade include:
(i) operating costs of about of about US$65 per recovered pound of U3O8.
(ii) market price of US$70 per pound U3O8,
(iii) recoveries based on historical recoveries for the Elliot Lake camp.

2 The potential quantity and grade of the potential mineral deposit identified in the Report are conceptual in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the targets being delineated as a mineral resource.

The TSX Venture Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. Some of the statements contained in this release are forward-looking statements, such as estimates and statements that describe Pele's future plans, objectives or goals, including words to the effect that Pele or management expects a stated condition or result to occur. Since forward-looking statements address future events and conditions, by their very nature, they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results in each case could differ materially from those currently anticipated in such statements.

[_MountainDew]

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Wednesday 24 January 2007

ADELAIDE RESOURCES ANNOUNCES MAIDEN URANIUM EXPLORATION DRILL PROGRAMS FOR SOUTH AUSTRALIA

http://www.adelaideresources.com.au/announcements/20070124%2…

0.50 +0.05 (11.11%)


Second Quarter Activities Report
http://www.adelaideresources.com.au/quart%20reports/20061231…

Second Quarter Cashflow Report
http://www.adelaideresources.com.au/announcements/20070124%2…

[_MountainDew]

MINDAX LIMITED

24/01/2007 Exploration Update - Noondie Uranium Project
http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20070124/pdf/310mg99l28pvk6.pdf

22/01/2007 Progress Report - Panhandle Gold-Copper-Uranium project
http://www.mindax.com.au/upload/documents/reports_announceme…

18/01/2007 Exploration Update - Bulga Downs Project
http://www.mindax.com.au/upload/documents/reports_announceme…

[UJL]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 26.971.597 von SilberEagle am 17.01.07 03:19:25

silbereagle.
schau dir doch mal Intl. Ranger an. Uranium Produktion schon 2007?
Dazu Gold, Moly etc.

OTC. IRNG;
Intl. Ranger

Schlusskurs OTC gestern USD 0,18

Stockhouse. Bullboard Searches. vom 25. Januar 2007.
Posting von stargazer1 und die Antworten vom 25./26.1.2007


How high can our stock go?

Our Foghorn property has a preliminary estimate, using old data, of 1.75 million lbs of uranium. The uranium deposits also contain radioactive thorium, and some newer nuclear reactor designs would run on thorium. So that could add to the value of the property. Since the previous drilling on our Foghorn property was stopped after an economical amount of uranium ore had been located, further drilling will most likely show that it has a lot more than 1.75 million lbs of uranium. The property also includes 2 million tons of 21% fluorite. The fluorite deposits also contain rare earth metals such as Niobium. Plus the adjacent Harper Creek gold deosit and the Jake Gold deposit, extend onto our Foghorn property. Previous drilling has also shown that we have molybdinum on our Foghorn property. Our Whiskey Gap property, which will use In Situ mining techniques, has higher radon readings than similar areas that are being mined in Texas, and those deposits vary from one to five million lbs of uranium. Previous drilling of our Hot Rocks property has given an estimate of 630,000 lb or uranium. Further drilling should increase this number. Areas near our Koorsharem property have had uranium deposits of up to 10% uranium. Drilling will probably show that the our claim will have substantial amounts of uranium. So there is a good chance that our Foghorn property has +2 million lbs of uranium, plus 1 million or more lbs from our Whiskey Gap property along with a million lbs each from our two new properties. This adds up to +5 million lbs of uranium. Most commentators are now saying that uranium could reach $100/lb this year and $200/lb in a few years. Just at $100/lb uranium, our +5 million would be worth +500 million dollars, and if the price of uranium went just partway towards $200/lb then it could easly reach $130/lb and our 5 million lbs of uranium would be worth $650 million dollars. And that's not taking into account our gold and molybdenum and rare earth etc. deposits. IRNG has 65 million shares. 650 million dollars divided by 65 million shares = $10/share. And we could have a lot more than 5 million lbs of uranium, plus uranium could go a lot higher than $100/lb and some commentators are now saying that it could go even higher than $200/lb. Plus many commentators are saying that a feeding frenzy for uranium companies could develop. And if we had a total of 7.5 million lbs of uranium instead of 5 million lbs, that would = $15/share. If you say that the mines would last 5 years, which is what I came up with on researching other mines, then, on a yearly production basis, that would = $3/share. That's before taking into consideration the cost of producing the uranium. In-situ mining is very inexpensive. Pit mining is more expensive. If you estimate that the cost of producing the uranium could decrease your profits by 1/3, then that would yield a yearly production earning of $2/share. From research that I have previously done, I have come up with a Price Earnings (PE) ration of 5X to 10X for similar mining companies. So a 5 PE ratio @ $2/share would give you a share price of $10/share and a PE ratio of 10X would give you a stock price of $20/share. And considering that we have gold and molybdenum etc. in addition to our uranium, we might end up being closer to a PE ration of 10X. So I would say that the price of our stcck, by the time we reach the stage of production, could be +$15/share. I hope that I haven't offended some people that may think that think that these share price projections are way too high.
I'm sorry if some people are upset at my projections.
I can only please one person per day.
Today is not your day.
Tomorrow does not look good either.

[Klardoch]

Appalaches Resources Inc.: $2 Million Option for Mont-de-l'Aigle Property

RIMOUSKI, QUEBEC--(CCNMatthews - Jan. 30, 2007) - Ressources Appalaches (TSX VENTURE:APP) has the pleasure of announcing the signing of an agreement with Ressources Threegold (TSX VENTURE:THG) for the pursuit of work on the Mont-de-l'Aigle property situated in Quebec's Gaspe region. Threegold has obtained the option to acquire 50% of the property by investing $2 million in work spread out over a period of five years with $500,000 firm for the first two years.

The property is composed of 185 claims over an area of 6,120 hectares. It is situated to the north of the Lemieux Dome which is a great circular antiform structure probably caused by a deep intrusion. The work by Appalaches has demonstrated the potential discovery of a copper deposit of the IOCG type in this part of the Dome.

This option will help Ressources Appalaches to concentrate its work on the uranium properties in the Godbout section and the Bornite Hill copper property in the Mont-Laurier region.

The contents of this press release was prepared by Alain Hupe, a NI 43 101-qualified geologist.

The TSX Venture Exchange does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

[Klardoch]

Globe and Mail Update


Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Uranium prices have resumed their upward climb after an apparent five-week lull.

The spot price for the fissile metal, the key component of atomic fuel, rose to $75 (U.S.) a pound in the week ended Monday, up $3, Ux Consulting Co. LLC of Roswell, Ga., said in a weekly report.

Uranium has been one of the hottest performers among commodities in the past several years. Its spot price has more than tripled since 2004, and a number of analysts expect it to approach the $100-a-pound mark this year.

The metal does not trade on any public market, and Ux Consulting tracks prices by keeping tabs on private deals.

Buyers have been reluctant to make firm-price offers in recent weeks, but the firm said there has been enough activity “to discern firm offer prices.”

A key recent impetus for the upward climb was the flooding late last October of a massive planned Cameco Inc. mine at Cigar Lake, Sask., that, assuming it can be saved and brought on stream down the road ,could churn out as much as 17 per cent of annual world production.

As well, hedge funds and other financial players have become substantial buyers of the radioactive metal.

[SilberEagle]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 27.194.993 von UJL am 26.01.07 11:02:29

@UJL

Danke für Deinen Hinweis auf Intl. Ranger. Ich kannte sie bereits, und sie ist sicher in einem spekulativ ausgerichteten Uranium Explorer Depot sehr gut aufgehoben. Selbst besitze ich jedoch noch keine Aktien dieses Titels. Es fehlt zur Zeit einfach am ..... Na Du weisst schon was ich meine.

Gruss

SilberEagle

[SilberEagle]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 27.305.256 von Klardoch am 30.01.07 20:52:43

@Klardoch

Danke Dir für diese ungemein hilfreichen 3 Dollar!

Jetzt mössen es die Anleger nur noch wissen. Den GEM.V Aktionären werde ich diese freudige Meldung sofort weiterleiten, denn immerhin ist durch diese 3 Dollar Pele Mountain mit ihren 33 Mio. Pfund Uran im Boden, gleich mal um 99 Mio. Dollar wertvoller geworden.

Gruss

SilberEagle

[Dere]

The Wallace Street Journal

By David Bond, Editor

The Silver Valley Mining Journal

http://www.silverminers.com/publications/showpub.aspx?id=501…

Gruß
Dere

[turbozertifikat]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 27.309.552 von Dere am 30.01.07 22:47:04

Hat das schon jemand von Euch gelesen ?

www.stockhouse.com/news/news.asp?newsid=4913046&tick=GEM

Gruss...

[SilberEagle]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 27.334.588 von turbozertifikat am 31.01.07 23:20:19

Ja sicher. Habe nichts anderes erwartet. Das machen sie doch (fast)alle die Explorer, immer wieder neue gratis Warrants/Optionen ausgeben. Die Anleger bezahlen die ganze Sache danach. Wenn es nach mir gehen würde, gäb es keine Gratis-, oder unterpreiste Optionen, weder bei Pele, noch sonst irgendwo.

[SilberEagle]

The spot price of uranium (U308) is now at least $75 a pound, Ux Consulting said
January 29. The consulting firm said that, based on some activity it has seen recently in
the spot market, the U3O8 price rose $3/lb and was now at $75/lb. There is still a
belief among suppliers that the price remains under considerable upward pressure, the
firm said. Based on discussions with market analysts, Platts said January 29 it was
likely that any spot market deals done over the next two weeks would be concluded
within a range of $75 to $81/lb. - NUCLEAR NEWS FLASHES - January 30, 2007

[Seven_Euro]

@ all:


Nachdem ich nun einige Zeit aus dem Wert verschwunden war, wollte ich mich wieder etwas intensiver mit Impact Silver beschäftigen...

Wer kann und möchte mich auf den aktuellsten Stand der Company bringen???

Dachte so an Updates der letzten 3 Monate bezüglich neuer Properties, NI 43-101 Ressourcen oder Produktionsausweitung???

Muss gestehen das mir die Homepage etwas unübersichtlich erscheint...

[URANI]

Kanadischer Explorer: Hohes Risiko – Hohe
Chance

Yola Edwards, Redakteurin des Börsenbriefs „Yola`s Charts“, geht mit
ihrer spekulativen Idee für 2007 aufs Ganze: Sie empfiehlt mit Pele
Mountain Resources (ISIN: CA7059071034) einen kanadischen
Explorer. Sie erklärt: Diamonds are a girl`s best friend, sagt man, aber
besser als das ist ein Mix aus Gold, Uran und Industriemetallen und
schon hat man einen wirklichen Unternehmens-Edelstein. Noch ist Pele
Mountain Resources mit seinen Vorkommen im Norden der kanadischen
Provinz Ontario unbekannt – doch das wird nicht mehr lange so bleiben.
Pele besitzt 100% am Elliott Lake Uran Projekt, was schon vor Jahren
geschlossen wurde, als der Uranpreis in den Keller ging und so die
Wettbewerbsfähigkeit nicht mehr gegeben war. Doch durch die starke
weltweite Nachfrage und das limitierte Angebot deutet sich ein lang
anhaltender Preisanstieg beim Uran an.
Auf Grund technischer Indikatoren habe ich ein erstes Kursziel von 1,70
Dollar errechnet. Doch das ist noch lange nicht das Ende der
Fahnenstange: Sollten sich erste Probebohrungen als richtig erweisen,
dann verfügt die Elliott Lake Region noch über weit mehr Reserven als
bislang angenommen und dann wäre die Aktie deutlich unterbewertet.

[UJL]

Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 27.334.588 von turbozertifikat am 31.01.07 23:20:19

Zum Thema: Top Ten Uranium stocks 2007

in Stockhouse.com gefunden von HB14, datiert vom 10. Februar



I can't comment on a TOP 10 list for U stocks
but here are some to review
and notes from a few other sources


re: U
------------------

here's a list of a few companies you might want to do your DD on
but I am not saying these are the top ones - just possible contenders in your U list...
do your own DD
cheers
HB14

------------------

• Canalaska Ventures Inc. www.canalaska.com
• Dejour Enterprises Ltd. www.dejour.com
• Entourage Mining Ltd. www.entouragemining.com
• ESO Uranium Corp. www.esouranium.com
• Forum Uranium Corp. www.forumdevelopmentcorp.com
• International Uranium Corporation www.intluranium.com
• JNR Resources www.jnrresources.com
• Logan Resources Ltd
• NorthWestern Mineral Ventures Inc. www.northwestmineral.com
• Nuinsco Resources Ltd. www.nuinsco.ca
• NVI Mining Ltd.
• Pitchstone Exploration Ltd. www.pitchstone.net
• Purepoint Uranium Group Inc. www.purepoint.ca
• Strathmore Minerals Corp. www.strathmoreminerals.com
• SXR Uranium One www.uranium1.com
• Titan Uranium Inc. www.titanuranium.com
• Trend Mining Co. www.trendmining.com
• Triex Minerals Corp. www.triexminerals.com
• UEX Corporation www.uex-corporation.com
• United Carina Resources Corp. www.unitedcarina.com

------------------

also here are a few comments by / Courtesy of TheRock17
and I am not agreeing/promoting his view, just presenting what
his comments were, just prior to 2007 - for your analysis
GL
from HB14
------------------

Some of the better uranium stocks are compared below.

DEN and IUC have been combined and CCO, a senior, has been eliminated as not comparable.

Matlock has provided valuation multiples of the few producing uranium stocks...these multiples were as of sept/06 and all have since increased, and as 2006 moves into 2007, the 2006 multiples will move upwards to match those of 2006...note how expensive the current producers are and then apply those 2006 multiples to a $60 million cash flow by EFR on 1 million lbs of U308 and 5 million lbs of V205 ( initial 2007 production rates )

( http://www.kitco.com/ind/Matlack/oct232006c.html )

Shares o/s have been used, although most have additional dilution...

*DEN/IUC - Will Merge in Dec/, 2nd larest Cdn producer, shares 180 MM - $8.25////expected 2007 production of 3.5m lbs U308 + 4.7m lbs V205///( Market cap per lb U308 production = $425)

*UUU - UrAsia, Kazakstan, shares 480 MM - $3.50////expected 2007 production of 1.8 m lbs U308 //(Market cap per lb U308 production= $930 )

*SXR - Uranium One, shares: 112.1 MM - $12.85////expected 2007 productin of 0.43 m lbs U308//( Market cap per lb U308 production= $3350 )

*EFR - Energy Fuels, Colorado/Utah/Arizona, shares: 28.9 MM - $4.34///expected 2007 production of 1 m lbs U308 + 2 m lbs V205// ( Market cap per lb U308 production = $125

EMC - Energy Metals, merge with HPU, shares: 65.9 MM - $8.50//production starts in 2008 at 1 m lbs U308 ( market cap = $575 million )

PDN - Paladin Resources, Namibia Africa, low grade open pit, 2008 start-up, shares : 493 MM - $5.25= $2.5 billion market cap

UEX - UEX Corporation, shares: 180.6 MM - $4.95///exploration play ( market cap of $900 million )

URE - Ur-Energy, shares: 68.9 MM - $4.50///Exploration play ( market cap of $315 million )


CXX - Crosshair, exploration, P.G.'s pick, shares: 60.7 MM - $2.75///exploration play ( market cap of $170 million )

STM - Strathmore minerals, shares 69.5 MM - $2.50///exploration play

JNN - JNR Resources, shares: 76.5 MM - $1.75//exploration play

RSC - Strateco Resources shares, Labrador exploration. PVE's only Uranium pick: 94.2 MM - $1.60///exploration play

Footnote....* current or expected producer in 2007.

As can be seen, there is a wide variation in the market cap per lb of U308 of expected 2007 production.

There are a variety of reasons for this, including production growth in 2008 ( eg, SXR is expected to grow production to 2.8 m lbs in 2008 ), reserves , investor following etc.

However, what stands out is that EFR is not only very cheap compared to its producing peers, but also that it is extremely cheap relative to the grass-roots exploration plays.

Almost certainly, this is in part due to its recent birth as a RTO in June/06, but also due to the fact that its acquisition of 3 formerly producing mines has been even more recent, and not yet fully appreciated by the market.

Much more information should be forthcoming over the next weeks/months that should fill the gap in many of the missing parameters..........cash costs, conversion to 43-101 compliancy,confirmation of production growth plans for to double production in 2008 and beyond,which should move EFR towards the average trading multiples of its producing peers.

If so, its not unreasonable that EFR would move to a market cap of $1.25 billion or more.

EMC is its best comparable, and EMC wont begin production til 2008...and at levels that will be less than that of EFR.Yet EMC's market cap is about 3 times that of EFR.

Thats why $10 by Xmas and $20 in 2007 are well within the parameterized valuations of EFR peers...

TheRock17 ( circa Dec 2006 )
---

general stuff

http://www.preciousmetalresources.com/canadian/uranium/marke…
http://www.investcom.com/moneyshow/uranium_athabasca.htm

http://www.canadianminingjournal.com/PressReleases/articlesb…
http://www.smallcapcenter.com/marketplace_volume.asp
http://www.robtv.com/
http://www.ResourceInvestor.com
http://www.bizwire.com
http://www.eeproductcenter.com/
http://www.amm.com/
http://www.24hpm.com/default.aspx
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/today.cgi
http://www.canadianinsider.com
http://www.todaysmoneynews.com/business-news.html?source=goo…
http://www.freemarketnews.com/portfolio/index.php
http://www.safehaven.com/article-3511.htm
http://www.minelinks.com/

-------

cheers
HB14