New CrowdStrike Report Finds an Increase in Cyber Adversaries Turning to Business Disruption as Main - Älteste Beiträge zuerst (Seite 2) | Diskussion im Forum
eröffnet am 08.02.20 20:17:48 von
neuester Beitrag 01.04.24 11:54:59 von
neuester Beitrag 01.04.24 11:54:59 von
Beiträge: 124
ID: 1.320.007
ID: 1.320.007
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 13.368
Gesamt: 13.368
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: US22788C1053 · WKN: A2PK2R · Symbol: CRWD
304,10
USD
+2,04 %
+6,08 USD
Letzter Kurs 00:14:04 Nasdaq
Neuigkeiten
| CrowdStrike Holdings Registered (A) Aktien jetzt im kostenlosen Demokonto handeln!Anzeige |
18.04.24 · Aktienwelt360 |
16.04.24 · Business Wire (engl.)  |
13.04.24 · Roland Jegen Anzeige |
09.04.24 · Business Wire (engl.) |
Werte aus der Branche Informationstechnologie
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 12,130 | +192,29 | |
| 0,5400 | +176,92 | |
| 5,0950 | +117,74 | |
| 1,5000 | +20,00 | |
| 174,60 | +20,00 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 20,06 | -19,76 | |
| 18,96 | -22,61 | |
| 1,1200 | -31,71 | |
| 5,0500 | -43,73 | |
| 8,1500 | -46,91 |
Feedback
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 62.746.783 von teecee1 am 21.02.20 10:55:48Montag, 9. März 2020
X-22 Report vom 8.3.2020 - Botschaften werden gesendet - Es ist fast soweit - T minus 2 - Es ist Zeit die Hitze zu bringen - Episode 2116b
Übersetzung von Dirk Dietrich*
------
Wir wissen, dass der Server des DNC nicht von den Russen gehackt wurde. Die Download-Geschwindigkeit der Datenmenge wurde ermittelt und zeigt, dass das von außerhalb des Serverraums nicht möglich gewesen kann. Erst recht nicht quer über den Atlantik. Das FBI hat den Server nie zu Gesicht bekommen, das übernahm alles die Firma CrowdStrike. Jetzt distanzieren sich Crowdstrike und ihre PR-Agentur von Russlands Link zu Wikileaks.
"Mehr als drei Jahre lang haben die Massenmedien (MSM) den größten Betrug in der Geschichte der USA gefördert - dass die Russen die E-Mails des DNC gehackt und die von ihnen gehackten E-Mails an WikiLeaks weitergegeben haben, die die E-Mails dann vor der Wahl 2016 durchsickern ließen. Nun macht die Firma, die im Zentrum dieses Betrugs steht, Crowdstrike, plötzlich einen Schritt zurück von ihren früheren Aktionen im Zusammenhang mit dem gesamten Betrug."
Sie wissen genau was kommt. Denke daran, dass Julian Assange mehrmals sagte, dass die Russen nichts mit dem DNC-Hack zu tun haben, sondern dass es eine Person aus dem DNC selbst war. Wir wissen, dass es Seth Rich war, der später erschossen wurde. Sein Tod wurde bis heute nicht aufgeklärt.
Rasmussen Reports twitterte Folgendes: https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/123600308142864384…
"Wenn Crowdstrike jetzt behauptet, sie hätten nicht bestätigt, dass Russen E-Mails an WikiLeaks gesendet haben, wer zum Teufel hat das dann getan?"
..........
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Crowdstrike and Their PR Firm Now Distance Themselves from Russia’s Link to Wikileaks — HUGE DEVELOPMENT
Joe Hoft by Joe Hoft March 6, 2020
...
Who Is Crowdstrike?
We reported that Crowdstike is related to the Ukraine and this is through Ukrainian billionaire and longtime contributor to the Clinton Foundation Victor Pinchuk. We also know Crowdstrike is connected to James Clapper and the Atlantic Group: ...
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/breaking-exclusive-…
.............
Die Wahrheit tröpfelt langsam ein. Wenn CrowdStrike jetzt zurückrudert und die geheimen Absprachen mit Russland ein Schwindel sind, bringt uns das zum nächsten Fall. Und das ist Roger Stone, der letzte, der von der Mueller-Bande angeklagt wurde.
"Wir haben das Mueller-Team bei einer gewaltigen Lüge erwischt - Roger Stone hatte Recht!"
"Am 23. Januar 2019 wurde Stone wegen einer Reihe von leichtfertigen Verbrechen angeklagt, bei denen er beschuldigt wurde, den Kongress belogen zu haben. In seinem Fall behauptete Stone, dass die DNC-Server im Jahr 2016 nie von Crowdstrike untersucht wurden, und bat um Beweise, dass dies der Fall war, weil es für seinen Fall relevant war. Stone wurde angeklagt, den Kongress über Russen, die den DNC gehackt und die gehackten E-Mails an WikiLeaks geschickt haben, belogen zu haben. Im Fall Roger Stone wurde auch aufgedeckt, dass CrowdStrike der US-Regierung drei "Berichtsentwürfe" über den so genannten Hack durch Russland gab, die voller Schwärzungen waren und das FBI hat ihnen einfach geglaubt. Das FBI hat die DNC-Server nie inspiziert. Es wurde auch berichtet, dass das Justizministerium nie die ungeschriebenen Kopien der Berichte von Crowdstrike erhalten hat."
Und der Fall von Roger Stone ist nicht er Einzige, wo sich herausstellt, dass Mueller gelogen hat. Da haben wir noch den Fall von General Flynn und den Fall Paul Manaford. Alle diese Fälle, die auf der Mueller-Untersuchung beruhen, fallen in sich zusammen. Nichts daran ist wahr. Sie haben diese Fälle regelrecht konstruiert. Und das kommt jetzt alles raus.
------
Es scheint, dass ein weiterer Richter plant, in den Ruhestand zu gehen. ...
https://qlobal-change.blogspot.com/2020/03/x-22-report-vom-8…
...
... 33.000 e-mails ... von Killery ... gespeichert von wem ... ??? ...
.................................................
X-22 Report vom 8.3.2020 - Botschaften werden gesendet - Es ist fast soweit - T minus 2 - Es ist Zeit die Hitze zu bringen - Episode 2116b
Übersetzung von Dirk Dietrich*
------
Wir wissen, dass der Server des DNC nicht von den Russen gehackt wurde. Die Download-Geschwindigkeit der Datenmenge wurde ermittelt und zeigt, dass das von außerhalb des Serverraums nicht möglich gewesen kann. Erst recht nicht quer über den Atlantik. Das FBI hat den Server nie zu Gesicht bekommen, das übernahm alles die Firma CrowdStrike. Jetzt distanzieren sich Crowdstrike und ihre PR-Agentur von Russlands Link zu Wikileaks.
"Mehr als drei Jahre lang haben die Massenmedien (MSM) den größten Betrug in der Geschichte der USA gefördert - dass die Russen die E-Mails des DNC gehackt und die von ihnen gehackten E-Mails an WikiLeaks weitergegeben haben, die die E-Mails dann vor der Wahl 2016 durchsickern ließen. Nun macht die Firma, die im Zentrum dieses Betrugs steht, Crowdstrike, plötzlich einen Schritt zurück von ihren früheren Aktionen im Zusammenhang mit dem gesamten Betrug."
Sie wissen genau was kommt. Denke daran, dass Julian Assange mehrmals sagte, dass die Russen nichts mit dem DNC-Hack zu tun haben, sondern dass es eine Person aus dem DNC selbst war. Wir wissen, dass es Seth Rich war, der später erschossen wurde. Sein Tod wurde bis heute nicht aufgeklärt.
Rasmussen Reports twitterte Folgendes: https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/123600308142864384…
"Wenn Crowdstrike jetzt behauptet, sie hätten nicht bestätigt, dass Russen E-Mails an WikiLeaks gesendet haben, wer zum Teufel hat das dann getan?"
..........
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Crowdstrike and Their PR Firm Now Distance Themselves from Russia’s Link to Wikileaks — HUGE DEVELOPMENT
Joe Hoft by Joe Hoft March 6, 2020
...
Who Is Crowdstrike?
We reported that Crowdstike is related to the Ukraine and this is through Ukrainian billionaire and longtime contributor to the Clinton Foundation Victor Pinchuk. We also know Crowdstrike is connected to James Clapper and the Atlantic Group: ...
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/breaking-exclusive-…
.............
Die Wahrheit tröpfelt langsam ein. Wenn CrowdStrike jetzt zurückrudert und die geheimen Absprachen mit Russland ein Schwindel sind, bringt uns das zum nächsten Fall. Und das ist Roger Stone, der letzte, der von der Mueller-Bande angeklagt wurde.
"Wir haben das Mueller-Team bei einer gewaltigen Lüge erwischt - Roger Stone hatte Recht!"
"Am 23. Januar 2019 wurde Stone wegen einer Reihe von leichtfertigen Verbrechen angeklagt, bei denen er beschuldigt wurde, den Kongress belogen zu haben. In seinem Fall behauptete Stone, dass die DNC-Server im Jahr 2016 nie von Crowdstrike untersucht wurden, und bat um Beweise, dass dies der Fall war, weil es für seinen Fall relevant war. Stone wurde angeklagt, den Kongress über Russen, die den DNC gehackt und die gehackten E-Mails an WikiLeaks geschickt haben, belogen zu haben. Im Fall Roger Stone wurde auch aufgedeckt, dass CrowdStrike der US-Regierung drei "Berichtsentwürfe" über den so genannten Hack durch Russland gab, die voller Schwärzungen waren und das FBI hat ihnen einfach geglaubt. Das FBI hat die DNC-Server nie inspiziert. Es wurde auch berichtet, dass das Justizministerium nie die ungeschriebenen Kopien der Berichte von Crowdstrike erhalten hat."
Und der Fall von Roger Stone ist nicht er Einzige, wo sich herausstellt, dass Mueller gelogen hat. Da haben wir noch den Fall von General Flynn und den Fall Paul Manaford. Alle diese Fälle, die auf der Mueller-Untersuchung beruhen, fallen in sich zusammen. Nichts daran ist wahr. Sie haben diese Fälle regelrecht konstruiert. Und das kommt jetzt alles raus.
------
Es scheint, dass ein weiterer Richter plant, in den Ruhestand zu gehen. ...
https://qlobal-change.blogspot.com/2020/03/x-22-report-vom-8…
...
... 33.000 e-mails ... von Killery ... gespeichert von wem ... ??? ....................................................
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 62.931.200 von teecee1 am 09.03.20 10:20:59Why Is CrowdStrike Confused On 11 Key Details About The DNC 'Hack'?
by Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/21/2020 - 21:20
Authored by Larry Johnson via Sic Semper Tyrannis blog,
Here is the bottom-line - despite being hired in late April (or early May) of 2016 to stop an unauthorized intrusion into the DNC, CrowdStrike, the cyber firm hired by the DNC's law firm to solve the problem, failed abysmally. More than 30,000 emails were taken from the DNC server between 22 and 25 May 2016 and given to Wikileaks. Crowdstrike blamed Russia for the intrusion but claimed that only two files were taken. And CrowdStrike inexplicably waited until 10 June 2016 to reboot the DNC network.
CrowdStrike, a cyber-security company hired by a Perkins Coie lawyer retained by the DNC, provided the narrative to the American public of the alledged hack of the DNC, But the Crowdstrike explanation is inconsistent, contradictory and implausible. Despite glaring oddities in the CrowdStrike account of that event, CrowdStrike subsequently traded on its fame in the investigation of the so-called Russian hack of the DNC and became a publicly traded company. Was CrowdStrike’s fame for “discovering” the alleged Russian hack of the DNC a critical factor in its subsequent launch as a publicly traded company?
The Crowdstrike account of the hack is very flawed. There are 11 contradictions, inconsistencies or oddities in the public narrative about CrowdStrike’s role in uncovering and ...
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/why-crowdstrike-confused…
......................................................
by Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/21/2020 - 21:20
Authored by Larry Johnson via Sic Semper Tyrannis blog,
Here is the bottom-line - despite being hired in late April (or early May) of 2016 to stop an unauthorized intrusion into the DNC, CrowdStrike, the cyber firm hired by the DNC's law firm to solve the problem, failed abysmally. More than 30,000 emails were taken from the DNC server between 22 and 25 May 2016 and given to Wikileaks. Crowdstrike blamed Russia for the intrusion but claimed that only two files were taken. And CrowdStrike inexplicably waited until 10 June 2016 to reboot the DNC network.
CrowdStrike, a cyber-security company hired by a Perkins Coie lawyer retained by the DNC, provided the narrative to the American public of the alledged hack of the DNC, But the Crowdstrike explanation is inconsistent, contradictory and implausible. Despite glaring oddities in the CrowdStrike account of that event, CrowdStrike subsequently traded on its fame in the investigation of the so-called Russian hack of the DNC and became a publicly traded company. Was CrowdStrike’s fame for “discovering” the alleged Russian hack of the DNC a critical factor in its subsequent launch as a publicly traded company?
The Crowdstrike account of the hack is very flawed. There are 11 contradictions, inconsistencies or oddities in the public narrative about CrowdStrike’s role in uncovering and ...
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/why-crowdstrike-confused…
......................................................
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 63.095.689 von teecee1 am 22.03.20 21:16:51No Proof That Russia Hacked DNC - Democrats Hid Sworn CrowdStrike Testimony For Over 2 Years
by Tyler Durden
Fri, 05/15/2020 - 14:10
Authored by Aaron Maté via RealClearInvestigations.com,
CrowdStrike, the private cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, acknowledged to Congress more than two years ago that it had no concrete evidence that Russian hackers stole emails from the Democratic National Committee’s server.
Crowdstrike President Shawn Henry: "We just don’t have the evidence..."
CrowdStrike President Shawn Henry's admission under oath, in a recently declassified December 2017 interview before the House Intelligence Committee, raises new questions about whether Special Counsel Robert Mueller, intelligence officials and Democrats misled the public. The allegation that Russia stole Democratic Party emails from Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and others and then passed them to WikiLeaks helped trigger the FBI's probe into now debunked claims of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia to steal the 2016 election. The CrowdStrike admissions were released just two months after the Justice Department retreated from its its other central claim that Russia meddled in the 2016 election when it dropped charges against Russian troll farms it said had been trying to get Trump elected.
Henry personally led the remediation and forensics analysis of the DNC server after being warned of a breach in late April 2016; his work was paid for by the DNC, which refused to turn over its server to the FBI. Asked for the date when alleged Russian hackers stole data from the DNC server, Henry testified that CrowdStrike did not in fact know if such a theft occurred at all: "We did not have concrete evidence that the data was exfiltrated [moved electronically] from the DNC, but we have indicators that it was exfiltrated," Henry said.
Henry reiterated his claim on multiple occasions: ...
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/no-proof-russia-hacked-d…
... ... CrowdStrike -> Silvercorp ... wir handelten im Auftrag von TRUMP ... 😶 ...
🤐🤐🤐🤐🤐🤐🤐🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥
by Tyler Durden
Fri, 05/15/2020 - 14:10
Authored by Aaron Maté via RealClearInvestigations.com,
CrowdStrike, the private cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, acknowledged to Congress more than two years ago that it had no concrete evidence that Russian hackers stole emails from the Democratic National Committee’s server.
Crowdstrike President Shawn Henry: "We just don’t have the evidence..."
CrowdStrike President Shawn Henry's admission under oath, in a recently declassified December 2017 interview before the House Intelligence Committee, raises new questions about whether Special Counsel Robert Mueller, intelligence officials and Democrats misled the public. The allegation that Russia stole Democratic Party emails from Hillary Clinton, John Podesta and others and then passed them to WikiLeaks helped trigger the FBI's probe into now debunked claims of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia to steal the 2016 election. The CrowdStrike admissions were released just two months after the Justice Department retreated from its its other central claim that Russia meddled in the 2016 election when it dropped charges against Russian troll farms it said had been trying to get Trump elected.
Henry personally led the remediation and forensics analysis of the DNC server after being warned of a breach in late April 2016; his work was paid for by the DNC, which refused to turn over its server to the FBI. Asked for the date when alleged Russian hackers stole data from the DNC server, Henry testified that CrowdStrike did not in fact know if such a theft occurred at all: "We did not have concrete evidence that the data was exfiltrated [moved electronically] from the DNC, but we have indicators that it was exfiltrated," Henry said.
Henry reiterated his claim on multiple occasions: ...
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/no-proof-russia-hacked-d…
...
... CrowdStrike -> Silvercorp ... wir handelten im Auftrag von TRUMP ... 😶 ...🤐🤐🤐🤐🤐🤐🤐🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 63.701.785 von teecee1 am 15.05.20 21:26:42 ... ... Wagner Group ...
Trump's "Keyboard Warriors" Get The Story While The Legacy Media Ignores #Obamagate
by Tyler Durden
Tue, 05/26/2020 - 23:25
Submitted by Thomas Farnan
CrowdStrike – the forensic investigation firm hired by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to inspect its computer servers in 2016 – admitted to Congressional investigators as early as 2017 that it had no direct evidence of Russian hacking, recently declassified documents show.
CrowdStrike’s president Shawn Henry testified, “There’s not evidence that [documents and emails] were actually exfiltrated [from the DNC servers]. There’s circumstantial evidence but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated.”
This was a crucial revelation because the thousand ships of Russiagate launched upon the positive assertion that CrowdStrike had definitely proven a Russian hack.
This sworn admission has been hidden from the public for over two years, and subsequent commentary has focused on that singular outrage.
The next deductive step, though, leads to an equally crucial point: Circumstantial evidence of Russian hacking is itself flimsy and collapses when not propped up by a claim of conclusive forensic testing.
THE COVER UP.
On March 19, 2016, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta, surrendered his emails to an unknown entity in a “spear phishing” scam. This has been called a “hack,” but it was not. Instead, it is was the sort of flim-flam hustle that happens to gullible dupes on the internet.
The content of the emails was beyond embarrassing. They showed election fraud and coordination with the media against the candidacy of Bernie Sanders. The DNC and the Clinton campaign needed a cover story.
There already existed in Washington brooding suspicion that Vladimir Putin was working to influence elections in the West. The DNC and the Clinton campaign set out to retrofit that supposition to explain the emails.
On January 16, 2016, a silk-stocking Washington D.C. think tank, The Atlantic Council (remember that name), had issued a dispatch under the banner headline: “US Intelligence Agencies to Investigate Russia’s Infiltration of European Political Part ...
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trumps-keyboard-warriors…
💣💵💣💶💣💵💣💶💣💵💣
... Wagner Group ...Trump's "Keyboard Warriors" Get The Story While The Legacy Media Ignores #Obamagate
by Tyler Durden
Tue, 05/26/2020 - 23:25
Submitted by Thomas Farnan
CrowdStrike – the forensic investigation firm hired by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to inspect its computer servers in 2016 – admitted to Congressional investigators as early as 2017 that it had no direct evidence of Russian hacking, recently declassified documents show.
CrowdStrike’s president Shawn Henry testified, “There’s not evidence that [documents and emails] were actually exfiltrated [from the DNC servers]. There’s circumstantial evidence but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated.”
This was a crucial revelation because the thousand ships of Russiagate launched upon the positive assertion that CrowdStrike had definitely proven a Russian hack.
This sworn admission has been hidden from the public for over two years, and subsequent commentary has focused on that singular outrage.
The next deductive step, though, leads to an equally crucial point: Circumstantial evidence of Russian hacking is itself flimsy and collapses when not propped up by a claim of conclusive forensic testing.
THE COVER UP.
On March 19, 2016, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta, surrendered his emails to an unknown entity in a “spear phishing” scam. This has been called a “hack,” but it was not. Instead, it is was the sort of flim-flam hustle that happens to gullible dupes on the internet.
The content of the emails was beyond embarrassing. They showed election fraud and coordination with the media against the candidacy of Bernie Sanders. The DNC and the Clinton campaign needed a cover story.
There already existed in Washington brooding suspicion that Vladimir Putin was working to influence elections in the West. The DNC and the Clinton campaign set out to retrofit that supposition to explain the emails.
On January 16, 2016, a silk-stocking Washington D.C. think tank, The Atlantic Council (remember that name), had issued a dispatch under the banner headline: “US Intelligence Agencies to Investigate Russia’s Infiltration of European Political Part ...
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trumps-keyboard-warriors…
💣💵💣💶💣💵💣💶💣💵💣
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 63.820.220 von teecee1 am 27.05.20 15:05:36The now-declassified transcripts are in the hands of his successor, former Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX), who was sworn in on Tuesday after the Senate confirmed him last Thursday by a vote of 49-44. Ratcliffe will decide whether they are released to the public, according to the New York Post. ...
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/grenell-declassifies-fly…
.............................
4331
John Brennan, Obama's CIA Dir., Manipulated Intel on Russian Interference in the 2016 Election
Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
27 May 2020 - 6:44:24 PM
https://qanon.pub/
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trumps-keyboard-warriors…📁
Intelligence was manipulated by [Brennan].
Watch the news.
Q
---
https://qmap.pub/?lang=de
Der Geheimdienst wurde von [Brennan] manipuliert.
Beobachte die Nachrichten.
Q
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/9332331.html#9332398
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/grenell-declassifies-fly…
.............................
4331
John Brennan, Obama's CIA Dir., Manipulated Intel on Russian Interference in the 2016 Election
Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
27 May 2020 - 6:44:24 PM
https://qanon.pub/
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trumps-keyboard-warriors…📁
Intelligence was manipulated by [Brennan].
Watch the news.
Q
---
https://qmap.pub/?lang=de
Der Geheimdienst wurde von [Brennan] manipuliert.
Beobachte die Nachrichten.
Q
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/9332331.html#9332398
Trading Spotlight
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 63.824.723 von teecee1 am 27.05.20 21:36:44CIA Fabricated Russiagate "Evidence", Says Former NSA Tech Chief
by Tyler Durden
Sun, 08/02/2020 - 00:00
Authored by Eric Zuesse via The Duran,
An important public statement was made on July 27th by Bill Binney, the U.S. Government’s top expert on the internet, and on computer hacking. He had been the Technical Director of the NSA when he quit and became a whistleblower against that Agency while George W. Bush was the U.S. President and invaded Iraq on the basis of faked evidence.
Binney has now laid out, in this speech, the evidence that he wants to present in court against Barack Obama’s CIA, that it defrauded Americans to believe in “Russiagate” (the allegation that Russia ‘hacked’ the computers of Hillary Clinton and Democratic Party officials and fed that information to Wikileaks and other organizations). Binney cites evidence, which, if true, conclusively proves that Russiagate was actually created fraudulently by the CIA’s extensive evidence-tampering, which subsequently became covered-up by the Special Counsel Robert Mueller, in his investigations for the Democratic Party’s first (and failed) try at impeaching and removing from office U.S. President Donald J. Trump. ...
n fact, we can’t even find anything that points to Russia, when in fact the Mueller indictment, or the Mueller report, and that Rosenstein indictment, named some that they called trolls for the Russian government, the IRA, the Internet Research Agency, out of St. Petersburg, and Russia, they named it in a court document, and, well, the IRA over there said we are no way near, we are not in any way associated with, the Russian government, so they sent lawyers in to challenge that in the court of law here in the U.S., and the court charged the government to prove it, and they couldn’t, they couldn’t prove anything, and so the judge basically reprimanded them and said you were never to mention the IRA as in any way affiliated with the Russian government again, so their whole case was falling apart. Everything looked like the rooks were two potato, was a fabrication, the alleged hack and so on, all applications, fabrication, and even if you look at some of the testimony that came out from the Crowdstrike CEO [hired by the Democratic National Committee], I think his name was Sean Henry, he said we we had no indications of exfiltrating the data, but we had evidence that it was exfiltrated. Now, if he’s talking about the last modified times as an indication of exfiltration, which it was but it wasn’t from a hack it was from a download, so that download then is an indication it was done locally as were the Guccifer 2 data that couldn’t go across the net. It was a download locally. All that stuff happened locally. In fact, ...
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/cia-fabricated-russiagat…
🦌 ... 🦌 ... 🦌 ... 🦌 ... 🦌 ... 🦌
by Tyler Durden
Sun, 08/02/2020 - 00:00
Authored by Eric Zuesse via The Duran,
An important public statement was made on July 27th by Bill Binney, the U.S. Government’s top expert on the internet, and on computer hacking. He had been the Technical Director of the NSA when he quit and became a whistleblower against that Agency while George W. Bush was the U.S. President and invaded Iraq on the basis of faked evidence.
Binney has now laid out, in this speech, the evidence that he wants to present in court against Barack Obama’s CIA, that it defrauded Americans to believe in “Russiagate” (the allegation that Russia ‘hacked’ the computers of Hillary Clinton and Democratic Party officials and fed that information to Wikileaks and other organizations). Binney cites evidence, which, if true, conclusively proves that Russiagate was actually created fraudulently by the CIA’s extensive evidence-tampering, which subsequently became covered-up by the Special Counsel Robert Mueller, in his investigations for the Democratic Party’s first (and failed) try at impeaching and removing from office U.S. President Donald J. Trump. ...
n fact, we can’t even find anything that points to Russia, when in fact the Mueller indictment, or the Mueller report, and that Rosenstein indictment, named some that they called trolls for the Russian government, the IRA, the Internet Research Agency, out of St. Petersburg, and Russia, they named it in a court document, and, well, the IRA over there said we are no way near, we are not in any way associated with, the Russian government, so they sent lawyers in to challenge that in the court of law here in the U.S., and the court charged the government to prove it, and they couldn’t, they couldn’t prove anything, and so the judge basically reprimanded them and said you were never to mention the IRA as in any way affiliated with the Russian government again, so their whole case was falling apart. Everything looked like the rooks were two potato, was a fabrication, the alleged hack and so on, all applications, fabrication, and even if you look at some of the testimony that came out from the Crowdstrike CEO [hired by the Democratic National Committee], I think his name was Sean Henry, he said we we had no indications of exfiltrating the data, but we had evidence that it was exfiltrated. Now, if he’s talking about the last modified times as an indication of exfiltration, which it was but it wasn’t from a hack it was from a download, so that download then is an indication it was done locally as were the Guccifer 2 data that couldn’t go across the net. It was a download locally. All that stuff happened locally. In fact, ...
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/cia-fabricated-russiagat…
🦌 ... 🦌 ... 🦌 ... 🦌 ... 🦌 ... 🦌
Gibt es eine Erklärung warum diese Aktie so stark verloren hat?
Kann ich nicht verstehen!
Kann ich nicht verstehen!
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 65.040.585 von Scheich2000 am 10.09.20 11:02:40Vielleicht weil CrowdStrike mit 28 mrd Dollar marktkapa bewertet wird aber immernoch defizitär ist...
Seit wann zählt sowas? Das war früher mal so, denke ich. Wichtig ist die Story und das daran viele glauben mit einer Firma reich zu werden. Das muss zählen, finde ich.
Nach der Logik könnte man auch ne 0 an den Kurs hängen und es würde bei 1280 stehen...
Aber was wenn einer mit ner besseren Story kommt?
Okay, An der Börse wird die Zukunft gehandelt, aber alles dreht sich dabei letztendlich um cash.
Aber was wenn einer mit ner besseren Story kommt?
Okay, An der Börse wird die Zukunft gehandelt, aber alles dreht sich dabei letztendlich um cash.
DurchsuchenBeitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Investoren beobachten auch:
| Wertpapier | Perf. % |
|---|---|
| +3,52 | |
| -0,06 | |
| +0,42 | |
| +10,03 | |
| +1,83 | |
| +6,47 | |
| +0,07 | |
| +1,18 | |
| +2,84 | |
| +2,32 |
Meistdiskutiert
| Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
|---|---|---|
| 215 | ||
| 90 | ||
| 76 | ||
| 58 | ||
| 54 | ||
| 36 | ||
| 34 | ||
| 29 | ||
| 27 | ||
| 25 |
New CrowdStrike Report Finds an Increase in Cyber Adversaries Turning to Business Disruption as Main
