checkAd

    Gulf Keystone Irak-Ölperle Deutschland schläft (Seite 48)

    eröffnet am 25.08.09 11:36:58 von
    neuester Beitrag 14.05.24 14:22:22 von
    Beiträge: 1.202
    ID: 1.152.605
    Aufrufe heute: 12
    Gesamt: 182.934
    Aktive User: 0

    ISIN: BMG4209G2077 · WKN: A2DGZ5
    1,5250
     
    EUR
    -2,37 %
    -0,0370 EUR
    Letzter Kurs 15.05.24 Lang & Schwarz

    Werte aus der Branche Öl/Gas

    WertpapierKursPerf. %
    4,8050+39,52
    5,2500+20,97
    15,000+15,38
    1,0900+9,00
    2.663,00+8,49
    WertpapierKursPerf. %
    5,030-9,04
    10,380-10,05
    19,270-10,97
    6,5500-12,08
    5,9460-75,48

    Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben

     Durchsuchen
    • 1
    • 48
    • 121

    Begriffe und/oder Benutzer

     

    Top-Postings

     Ja Nein
      Avatar
      schrieb am 09.03.12 12:44:11
      Beitrag Nr. 732 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 42.876.900 von moneyscheffler am 09.03.12 12:17:12@money
      hoffe, das du keinen Sl hattest.
      Eine der 3 "Haus"banken von GKP - HSBC - hielt ein neues Kursziel (280Pence) für nötig. Ermittlung erfolgte mit insgesamt 75% Rabattierung. Sollten wohl doch noch ein paar Anleger etabliert werden. Tief in der Phase war bei 210 Pence. Eigentlich sonst nichts passiert - IRAK: noch da, Ölfunde & -bohrungen: noch da, GERÜCHTE: noch da, EXXON in Kurdistan: noch da.

      Nur der Aktienkurs muss noch da hin, wo er eigentlich hin gehört.

      Gruss MBent
      Avatar
      schrieb am 09.03.12 12:17:12
      Beitrag Nr. 731 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 42.874.482 von moneyscheffler am 08.03.12 23:38:11Da ist man einige Tage beim Skifoarn und schon bricht hier alles zusammen.
      Wahnsinn.
      Was ist passiert ?
      Bitte klärt mich auf.
      Da weiß man wirklich nicht, ob ein SL gut ist oder nicht.


      Dachte egtl. hier wäre jemand so frei und würde mir was sagen.....?! :D
      1 Antwort
      Avatar
      schrieb am 09.03.12 08:47:53
      Beitrag Nr. 730 ()
      morgen :)

      Exxon pressing forward on KRG, Qurna deals es paßt hier alles zusammen....:D

      By Ben Van Heuvelen and Staff of Iraq Oil Report
      Published March 9, 2012

      Subscription

      http://www.iraqoilreport.com/business/companies/exxon-pressi…


      Faced with an ultimatum from the Iraqi government - to decide between doing business with Baghdad or the semi-autonomous Kurdistan region - ExxonMobil has made its choice: both.

      In recent weeks, as the Iraqi government has ratcheted up the pressure, sources say the U.S. government has also made efforts to broker a "freeze" on the Kurdistan deals.

      But at a Thursday meeting with financial analysts at the New York Stock Exchange, Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson confirmed that his company intended to ...
      Avatar
      schrieb am 08.03.12 23:38:11
      Beitrag Nr. 729 ()
      Da ist man einige Tage beim Skifoarn und schon bricht hier alles zusammen.
      Wahnsinn.
      Was ist passiert ?
      Bitte klärt mich auf.
      Da weiß man wirklich nicht, ob ein SL gut ist oder nicht.

      rumor
      contracts signed as per Analyst Presentation today


      Quelle, bitte.
      2 Antworten
      Avatar
      schrieb am 08.03.12 17:05:41
      Beitrag Nr. 728 ()
      rumor

      contracts signed as per Analyst Presentation today:D

      Trading Spotlight

      Anzeige
      East Africa Metals
      0,0700EUR -9,09 %
      Das Gold-Einhorn des Jahres!mehr zur Aktie »
      Avatar
      schrieb am 08.03.12 16:06:36
      Beitrag Nr. 727 ()
      danke für die blumen earthfire :)

      gutes post von mo3......

      I would be surprised to hear anything about Kurdistan is the presentation today and I think questions after may draw a blank- there is really no need for them to discuss it further- the details were quite clearly released 3-4 weeks ago- 5yr exploration license with possible extension, 20yr production license with possible 5 year extension- its a done deal, contracts signed, EXXON happy, KRG happy, me happy, Bobs your uncle and Sallys your Aunt....
      Avatar
      schrieb am 08.03.12 09:43:17
      Beitrag Nr. 726 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 42.868.941 von ikarusfly am 08.03.12 09:38:42Morgen Ikarus ;) heute 300pc knacken ?c das wäre was...und ein schönes Signal ! :D

      Ich wollte mich mal bedanken, für die Infos die du hier immer wieder einstellst !! :)

      Danke und Gruß Earthfire
      Avatar
      schrieb am 08.03.12 09:38:42
      Beitrag Nr. 725 ()
      morgen .....



      If the OWC has not been found at any of the Oil levels, then that level is filled to spill up to that step out well.

      So the OWC is further out if thats the case
      ----------------------------------------------
      Thought so Mikey, thanks.

      Man if true Shaikan really is a MONSTER!!

      I was reading this post last night from BBBS:

      BBBS post from June 29th post...

      Well spotted duffs55, GKP's latest tender "GKPI-SH-2011-060 - Civil Works for Shaikan Location C" is of course the wellsite for SH-6. So not quite so 'contingent' any more - can't think why LOL! Unless perhaps it is just slightly related to the quest for water, aka the OWC...

      Now before some get confused again about well Location letters and well sequence numbers, the following shows the translation based on slide #14 in the May 2010 Investor Presentation:

      SH-1 and SH-3: Both close to the green blob labelled Shaikan-1B
      SH-2: Shaikan-B Location (around 9 km east of SH-1/3)
      SH-4: Shaikan-D Location (around 6 km west of SH-1/3)
      SH-5: Shaikan-G Location (around 15 km north-east of SH-1/3)
      SH-6: Shaikan-C Location (around 18 km east of SH-1/3)

      Just take a moment to consider those step-out distances - mind boggling.

      But it's also interesting to look longer at this map, (which is a blown-up version of the contour map for "Top Jurassic TWT P1 (~2230m TVDSS)" aka 'filled-to-spill' shown on slide #18), to undertand why SH-6 can no longer remain contingent. The colours denote the relative 'height' of the structure with yellow being shallowest (crestal parts of the structure) and then passing through orange and red to green, with green corresponding more or less to the base or spill-point of the structure (note how green spreads out north, south and east into the surrounding neighbourhood - but for some strange reason (LOL!) there is no green in SA's direction!). All good so far? Good. Now observe the colours at each well location:

      SH-1 and SH-3: Yellow-to-slight orange
      SH-2: (B Location): Red
      SH-4: (D Location): Yellow
      SH-5: (G Location): Orange
      SH-6: (C Location): Reddish Green

      We already know that SH-1 was far from finding the OWC because of its location near the crest of the structure (LKO was circa -1149m SS). The same geometrical constraint will also impact the SH-4 and SH-5 wells if they are drilled vertically from the selected Locations. i.e. both SH-4 and SH-5 are in near-crestal locations so they would be extremely unlikely to encounter the OWC in the Jurassic. Clearly these two wells have other objectives that are more important, namely proving up reserves to the west (SH-4), and to the north of the main northern W-E fault (SH-5). I mention this mainly to explain that Shaikan appraisal is not just about 'how thick' (as in OWC), but also about 'how long' & 'how wide' (areal extent). So let's not have wild hopeful speculation about finding the Jurassic OWC in either SH-4 or SH-5 (unless they start drilling deviated wells of course!).

      So what about SH-2 - it's 'in the red'? The OWC was also not encountered at SH-2, but based on the OIP upgrade to P10 volumes it would seem that LKO has at least been proven down to around -1500m SS. Perhaps it will be proven deeper by the time that middle and lower Jurassic SH-2 results are incorporated, but it will still be some way from proving the -2230m SS filled-to-spill OWC depth, (because the well entered the Triassic well above the Jurassic OWC depth). Well, IMO, if there's no OWC 'in the red' after stepping out 9km what can you do other than step-out another 9km and have another crack 'in the reddish green'. Oh no, another 9km wide by another 700m or so additional thickness down to the OWC - how on earth will the sp survive?

      So just how much more patience is needed for SH-6 and the OWC quest? (keep in mind, as in my previous post, SA-1 was also a water-free drill with no sign of an OWC). Well, slide #13 in the latest AGM Presentation says SH-6 spud in August (rig from SH-2). That's only a mon
      1 Antwort
      Avatar
      schrieb am 07.03.12 13:12:42
      Beitrag Nr. 724 ()
      Gestern hätte ich schön einsteigen können, hatte sogar Zeit, nur meine Internetverbindung war sauschlecht, keine zeitnahen Daten kein Trading...:(
      Avatar
      schrieb am 07.03.12 12:03:40
      Beitrag Nr. 723 ()
      Zitat von ikarusfly: Hate to be a bore, but I did mention this news about Statoil selling up in WQ in my posting on the 9th Feb...!

      The reason Helge Lund (Statoil Pres. & CEO) said he was pulling out was mostly down to "deteriorating security concerns" and that their 18-ish % stake wasn't worth the bother.
      int. post

      http://www.iii.co.uk/investment/detail/?showthreads=0&thresh…

      But there is also more to it than that:

      I know from a very reliable, very senior source at the Foreign & Commenwealth Office that Statoil ARE in Kurdistan and actively interested in acquistions. That's not conjecture - that is a fact, from the British government on the ground over there.

      Another massive name (and most advanced NOC in the world) joins the goldrush...!


      Das genug Majors bzw. Supermajors sind, mit dem nötigen Interesse und das passende Portmonnaie...ist ja eigendlich klar. :laugh:
      • 1
      • 48
      • 121
       DurchsuchenBeitrag schreiben


      Investoren beobachten auch:

      WertpapierPerf. %
      +0,71
      +0,85
      -0,29
      -0,19
      +0,77
      -6,49
      -0,38
      -0,41
      -1,64
      -1,18
      Gulf Keystone Irak-Ölperle Deutschland schläft