Sulphco - kurzfristige Reboundchance - 500 Beiträge pro Seite

[DonnieVie]

Nach dem krititschen Artikel im Barrons Magazine hat der
Ölwandler-Wert an zwei aufeinanderfolgenden Tagen jeweils
40 % verloren. Der Boden ist bei ca. 5,60 € gefunden,
nun erholt sich der Wert zunehmend. Interessant ist heute
zudem noch der Start in den Staaten, ein Blick auf die
Futures könnte dem Rebound helfen.

[androm]

Hi !!!!

habe die SUL seit gestern.Wo kann ich mir die Futures
in Amiland ansehen??Danke...

[ooy]

Bloss Finger weg von dieser Riesenblase.
Schaut euch mal die letzten Berichte auf Yahoo an, dann fasst ihr die Aktie garantiert nicht an.

[ooy]

Z.B. den:



SOMETHING SMELLED FUNNY to us about the fact that a tiny, unprofitable company with an unproven method of removing sulfur from oil was commanding a billion-dollar market cap. After sending the stock up nearly six-fold in less than three months, investors are finally holding their noses, too. Shares of SulphCo (SUF: 10.25, -9.25, -47.4%) plunged 48% to $10.25 Monday following a Barron`s story that called into question the promise of the technology and the credibility of management.
The spectacular run-up had been fueled by the frenzy surrounding $70-a-barrel oil prices and a series of promising press releases issued by the Sparks, Nev., company. In the releases, SulphCo outlined a deal to try out its ultrasound-based "Sonocracking" technology in an obscure corner of the United Arab Emirates. The proposition of wringing more usable fuel from the sulfurous grades of crude found throughout the Middle East trumped — in speculators` minds, at least — SulphCo`s scant revenues and $6.5 million in losses for the first nine months of 2005. Interest from Total France to test the system was icing on the cake. The stock hit an all-time high of $19.70 on Friday.

Although the 22-person company has been the focus of several skeptical media reports since its shares started their ascent from $3.45 apiece on Nov. 9, the Barron`s story was the only one that managed to strike a chord with stockholders. It retold the spotty history of SulphCo founder Rudolph Gunnerman`s failed ventures, brushes with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and legal entanglements with disgruntled investors. The New York Post reported many of Gunnerman`s past woes on Nov. 27, including the demise of Vinter`s Light Wine, a failed company founded by Gunnerman that promised to remove alcohol from wine for use as a fuel additive. The deal with Trans Gulf Petroleum, based in the United Arab Emirates, was announced Nov. 28, the day after the Post story was published.

SulphCo said it agreed with Trans Gulf Petroleum to build a plant that could desulfurize 30,000 barrels of so-called sour crude oil before it`s refined into gasoline, diesel fuel and other petroleum products. The process is supposed to cost-effectively yield an additional seven gallons of usable diesel fuel and kerosene per barrel of crude oil, according to Peter Gunnerman, the son of Rudolph Gunnerman and SulphCo`s president. Since sulfur is an undesirable element in crude, any process that can remove it cheaply is attractive.

Phone messages left for Trans Gulf Petroleum`s management weren`t returned. However, an unidentified person who answered the telephone described the SulphCo project as a small operation housed on a dairy farm in Fujairah, located on the Indian Ocean side of the Arabian Peninsula far away from the major oil-refining operations in the Persian Gulf.

Calls to Total weren`t returned either. In an interview last week with SmartMoney.com, Peter Gunnerman described the arrangement with the French oil giant as a test of the company`s technology. Total is sending executives to Nevada to witness the results of SulphCo`s ultrasound process on sour, heavy crude, says Peter Gunnerman.

"There`s no commercial agreement," says Peter Gunnerman. "If they`re interested, further steps can be taken, but at this point it`s just a simple test agreement."

The deal with Total expires at the end of April. SulphCo had a similar arrangement with Chevron (CVX: 62.21, +1.09, +1.8%) that launched in 2002, but Chevron abandoned the testing last summer. The sulfur-removing technique never found its way out of the laboratory