checkAd

    Öl um Falkland >Zukunftsinvestition? FIH PLC ehemals Falkland Islands Holding (Seite 9)

    eröffnet am 18.08.04 10:22:24 von
    neuester Beitrag 16.05.24 11:07:50 von
    Beiträge: 1.017
    ID: 894.455
    Aufrufe heute: 3
    Gesamt: 112.954
    Aktive User: 0

    ISIN: GB00BD0CWJ91 · WKN: A2ACT7
    3,1300
     
    EUR
    -0,63 %
    -0,0200 EUR
    Letzter Kurs 21:26:59 Lang & Schwarz

    Werte aus der Branche Industrie/Mischkonzerne

    WertpapierKursPerf. %
    0,6000+32,74
    0,9700+8,74
    2,7500+8,27
    0,8000+6,67
    3,1200+6,48
    WertpapierKursPerf. %
    9,4460-4,33
    7,2600-5,59
    33,30-8,52
    15,600-13,43
    22,106-18,80

    Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben

     Durchsuchen
    • 1
    • 9
    • 102

    Begriffe und/oder Benutzer

     

    Top-Postings

     Ja Nein
      Avatar
      schrieb am 24.04.17 12:43:42
      Beitrag Nr. 937 ()
      Avatar
      schrieb am 15.04.17 23:02:16
      Beitrag Nr. 936 ()
      Falklands: Dolphin Fund desists from taking over FIH Group, at this time
      Friday, April 14th 2017 - 18:33 UTC

      Dolphin Fund Ltd said late Thursday that it has decided not to make an offer for FIH Group PLC at this time, following a letter from the Falkland Islands Government warning FIH about its status should it undertake a change of ownership.

      On Monday, FIH said it had received a letter from the Falkland Islands government that states the company could lose the status that allows FIH to acquire land without obtaining a licence should the ownership of the business change.

      The letter arrived after the takeover bid made by Staunton Holdings Ltd that FIH had recommended to its shareholders fell through last week. Staunton had failed to reach its lowered threshold for acceptances.

      Staunton is an existing shareholder of FIH and, as well as FIH's largest shareholder Blackfish Capital Alpha Fund SPC, is connected to FIH Chairman Edmund Rowland.

      Although Staunton's offer lapsed, Dolphin Fund had indicated its interest in making a bid at an 11% premium to the one made by Staunton, which would be in the range of 333.3 pence per FIH share. But FIH had objected to this potential offer.

      FIH's objection to any possible bid from Dolphin - described as “inappropriate and damaging” by the London-listed firm - is based on concerns that, because Dolphin Fund is owned by an Argentine citizen, any sale could mean its business is undermined in the Falkland Islands.

      Argentina claims the Falkland Islands, which are a British Overseas Territory over which the two countries fought a war in 1982, following the Argentine military invasion of the Islands. FIH, formerly called Falkland Islands Holdings, owns the Falkland Islands Co, Portsmouth Harbour Ferry Co, and art transport and storage service Momart.

      Dolphin said on Thursday it was conscious of the need to create a constructive dialogue with FIH and had sought to get an extension to the deadline to present its formal offer under UK takeover code, or to make an offer “conditional on having received the necessary licences and/or permits to hold assets in the Islands” it said, “with the purpose of not damaging the company's interest if Dolphin's offer was accepted by FIH's current shareholders”.

      However, the takeover panel confirmed that no extension was possible without the consent of FIH.

      “Dolphin remains convinced of the value within FIH as a long term shareholder, and of the fact that the lapsed Offer of 300p from Staunton Holdings Ltd did not reflect this value”, it said. Additionally, Dolphin said it reserves the right to acquire further shares in the market within the rules of UK takeover code.

      As it has decided not to pursue an offer at this time, under UK takeover code it will be precluded from making an offer for 6 months unless a firm intention to make an offer is announced by a third party, or if the UK takeover panel has decided a “material change has occurred”.

      http://en.mercopress.com/2017/04/14/falklands-dolphin-fund-d…
      http://www.lse.co.uk/regulatory-news-article.asp?ArticleCode…
      http://www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/news/AN_1492106639005387600/…
      Avatar
      schrieb am 11.04.17 08:28:51
      Beitrag Nr. 935 ()
      Avatar
      schrieb am 10.04.17 13:35:04
      Beitrag Nr. 934 ()
      http://www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/news/AN_1491818458539500700/…

      https://uk.advfn.com/stock-market/london/fih-group-FIH/share…

      Die ziehen wirklich alle Register um ihre Buddys für den Rowlanddeal einzuspannen. Dann soll dieser McMoneysack doch einen fairen Preis bieten. Wenn Dolphin gekauft und mehr bezahlt hat, ist es den Altaktionären doch wurscht ob die Inselregierung vermeintliche Sonderrechte aufhebt. Eduardo Elsztain hat vermutlich genug Kohle um sich den Spaß zu gönnen, während die Rowlands sich das ebenfalls locker leisten könnten aber nichts besser zu tun haben als andere abzuzocken.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 08.04.17 12:05:23
      Beitrag Nr. 933 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 54.698.312 von Fuchs_I am 07.04.17 16:35:06...also was passieren muss, ist dass die ganze Führungsmannschaft abtritt. Wenn man Zweidrittel der Aktionäre gegen sich hat, müsste das eigentlich freiwillig geschehen. Allerings dürften diese inzwischen alle willige Rowlandgefolgsleute sein. Der sieht die Falklandchance genau wie wir und kann warten. Ich und sicher auch die Rowlands glauben sicher daran, dass die ganze Falklandbesitzungen in 20 Jahren unabhängig vom Öl ein Vielfaches des jetzigen Preises wert sein werden. Fragt sich nur, ob man es sich leisten will einen Filius dort die ganze Zeit bis man die Mehrheit hat den CEO mimen zu lassen. Vermute allerdings der ist sonst auch nirgendwo besonders sinnvoll einsetzbar.

      Was in jedem Fall noch kommen muss, ist ein Statement des Dolphin Funds. Bin gespannt, ob die aufstockenn und aus dem voraussichtlichen 333 Penceangebot eine echtes machen.

      Wie es aber auch kommt. Ich bin froh, dass die Risiken eines Delistings offenbar abgeräumt sind und die Rowlands zurechtgestutzt wurden.

      Trading Spotlight

      Anzeige
      InnoCan Pharma
      0,1935EUR -4,68 %
      Neuer Rekord – Innocan Pharma ver-4-facht den Quartalsumsatz! mehr zur Aktie »
      Avatar
      schrieb am 07.04.17 16:35:06
      Beitrag Nr. 932 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 54.689.819 von Andrija am 06.04.17 14:51:08http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/news/alliance-ne…

      "As such, the offer has lapsed Thursday."

      Sehe ich auch so @Andrija, wenn mich mein Englisch nicht im Stich lässt ;) : Das Angebot ist erloschen.

      Also alles auf Null und abwarten, was weiter passiert und ob überhaupt was passiert, oder???

      Gruß
      Fuchs
      1 Antwort
      Avatar
      schrieb am 06.04.17 14:51:08
      Beitrag Nr. 931 ()
      Die Übernahme ist wie erwartet gescheitert.

      http://www.fihplc.com/download/staunton/2017-04-06/Staunton%…

      Nur 37,1% bekommen. Ich verstehe es aber so, dass die Andienenden jetzt ihre Aktien behalten "dürfen/müssen".
      2 Antworten
      Avatar
      schrieb am 04.04.17 16:18:53
      Beitrag Nr. 930 ()
      Mir ist absolut unklar, warum der Kurs immer noch um 305 rumdümpelt.

      Inzwischen kauft sich eine Schweizer Holding offenbar massiv ein und hält inzwischen über 5%:

      http://www.janser-holding.ch/GESCHAeFTSFUeHRUNG.htm

      Nichtsdestotrotz wehren sich unsere "Independent directors" mit allen Mitteln gegen Dolphin. Das wird nichts helfen. Auch wenn angeblich unabhängige Banken das "faire" Angebot untersucht haben, wird diese miese Masche Edmund morgen nicht wesentlich mehr Aktien bringen. Eine Riesensauerei ist, dass die offenbar mit "unserem Firmengeld" eine Analyse in Edmunds Sinn gefahren haben, anstatt eine Dividende zu zahlen. :mad:

      Wenn Edmund nicht durchkommt und die anderen Aktionäre tun sich auf der HV zusammen, jagt man diese Bande hoffentlich zum Teufel und stellt Regressforderungen.
      http://en.mercopress.com/2017/04/04/fih-independent-director…" target="_blank" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">
      http://en.mercopress.com/2017/04/04/fih-independent-director…

      FIH independent directors still view Dolphin takeover approach as “unwelcome”
      Tuesday, April 4th 2017 - 10:10


      FIH Group PLC said on Monday it still views a potential takeover approach from Dolphin Fund Ltd as “unwelcome” and recommends an existing bid from Staunton Holdings Ltd.

      FIH's independent directors said they continue to see an engagement with Dolphin as “inappropriate and damaging”, due to the fund's ownership by an Argentine citizen and the possibility of undermining its business in the Falkland Islands. As such, they refuse to provide Dolphin with information on FIH.

      Argentina claims the Falkland Islands, which are a British Overseas Territory over which the two countries fought a war in 1982. FIH, formerly called Falkland Islands Holdings, owns the Falkland Islands Co, Portsmouth Harbour Ferry Co and art transport and storage service Momart.

      FIH said it continues to recommend Staunton's 300.0 pence a share bid for the company, despite Dolphin's indications it is considering making an offer for the company at 333.3p a share. Dolphin is yet to make a formal takeover approach for FIH.

      Shares in FIH were up 0.2% at 303.00p Monday afternoon.

      Follows the response to Dolphin Fund Limited’s update on its possible offer for FIH

      ”Referring to the announcement of an „update on possible offer for FIH” released by Dolphin Fund Limited („Dolphin„) at 5.43 p.m. on 31 March 2017, the Independent Directors of FIH, John Foster and Jeremy Brade (the „Independent Directors”), wish to clarify their position regarding Dolphin’s unwelcome approach and remind shareholders of Staunton Holdings Limited’s („Staunton„) recommended offer which is open for acceptance until 1.00 p.m. on 5 April 2017.

      “Dolphin’s possible offer

      ”Dolphin has on two previous occasions announced that it is considering making a „possible offer for FIH„. In this regard the Independent Directors have made Dolphin via its advisers aware of the following concerns regarding its approach:

      ”Given recent history and the sensitivities surrounding the Falkland Islands, there is real and understandable concern in Stanley about any Argentine backed attempt to own assets or to exercise control over businesses in the Islands. The fact that The Falkland Islands Company („FIC„) is an iconic institution, and has been part of the cultural fabric of the Islands for over 165 years, has only heightened the concerns of politicians and local people;

      ”the Falkland Islands Government („FIG„) has the power to grant or withhold licenses to own assets and land in the Islands. FIG has stated that it is closely monitoring the situation and will scrutinize any proposed change of ownership for compliance with Falkland Islands Law.

      “Furthermore the Independent Directors believe that, notwithstanding its statement of well-intentioned aims, Dolphin not having engaged with the people and Government of the Falkland Islands to secure local support for its future plans, and not having demonstrated unequivocally that its approach would not be detrimental to the value of FIC, it would be inappropriate and damaging to FIH to engage with Dolphin.

      ”Accordingly, as Dolphin’s approach is seen to pose a hazard to FIH, the Independent Directors will not (and are not required to) provide Dolphin with information on FIH and are not prepared to enter into discussions with Dolphin.

      “The statements made by Dolphin do not constitute an offer in contrast to the firm cash offer of 300 pence per share made by Staunton, which has been recommended unanimously by the Independent Directors. This recommendation of 10 February 2017 was made after due reflection and after taking detailed advice from professional advisers. The recommendation has since been continually reviewed, including by a second independent investment bank, and the Independent Directors confirm the recommendation and their view that the offer represents fair and appropriate value for FIH Shares and provides a genuine opportunity for FIH Shareholders to monetize their investment”.
      Avatar
      schrieb am 03.04.17 12:49:42
      Beitrag Nr. 929 ()
      http://ican.tddirectinvesting.co.uk/alliance-news/dolphin-fu…

      Dolphin Fund Considering Offer For FIH At 11% Premium To Staunton’s
      LONDON (Alliance News) – Dolphin Fund Ltd on Friday said it is considering making an offer for FIH Group PLC at 333.3 pence, ahead of the 300.0p offer from Staunton Holdings Ltd, after Staunton said it would not be increasing its offer Thursday.

      Shares in FIH closed down 0.8% at 300.00p Friday.

      Staunton, which holds a 25% stake in FIH Group, said Thursday it will not be increasing its offer, despite threats from Dolphin that it is willing to pay a “significant premium”. Dolphin has not made a formal offer despite indicating its interest, but FIH called the approach by Dolphin Fund “unwelcome” and a “hazard” to the company, noting Dolphin Fund is owned by an Argentinian citizen and claiming this may undermine its business in the Falkland Islands.

      Argentina claims the Falkland Islands, which are a British Overseas Territory over which the UK fought a war in 1982.

      Dolphin said late Friday that it “continues to believe” that Staunton’s offer “undervalues” the company, and reiterated its point that FIH’s share price has, on average, traded above 300 pence since the announcement of the offer.

      Dolphin said it has continued to consider “how best to put a possible offer to shareholders of FIH”.

      “The Independent Directors’ refusal to provide any information to Dolphin about FIH clearly puts Dolphin at a disadvantage to Staunton, by virtue of its association with the chairman of FIH, Edmund Rowland,” Dolphin said.

      It said that “nevertheless”, it is “considering making an offer at 333.3p per ordinary share in cash”. This puts its offer at an 11% premium to Staunton’s.

      “If FIH announces, declares or pays any dividend or any other distribution to shareholders, Dolphin reserves the right to make an equivalent reduction in any offer price,” Dolphin said.

      Dolphin added that it “remains determined to pursue its plans and to this end has sought to open dialogue with the Independent Directors to discuss its plans.”

      It urged FIH shareholders not to take any action in regards to Staunton’s offer, which will remain open until next Wednesday afternoon, for the time being.

      Tja, etwas halbgar. Warum lässt man die Aktionäre in Unsicherheit, falls doch noch jemand auf die blöde Idee kommt das Rowlandangebot anzunehmen? Verlieren kann man nichts wenn man 333 Pence anbietet. Dass FIH deutlich mehr wert ist, sollte jedem klar sein. Im Zweifelsfall erhöhen die Rowlands und der eigene Antei ist auch mehr wert.

      Ich habe jedenfalls in London Teile meiner verkauften Positionen wieder aufgestockt. 303 Pence ist dann doch ein vernachlässigbares Premium zu den sicher auch in einer dritten Verlängerung noch gebotenen 300 Pence der Rowlands.

      Inzwischen sind auch die Insulaner nicht untätig. Für FIH wird das auch zu einem zukünftigen Wachstum beitragen:
      http://us8.campaign-archive2.com/?u=2abe0425e0c8db5d48bd90c9…

      FALKLAND ISLANDS GOVERNMENT
      PRESS STATEMENT
      31st March 2017
      Executive Council approves commencement of work on plans for a new Port
      Avatar
      schrieb am 23.03.17 13:18:07
      Beitrag Nr. 928 ()
      Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 54.596.793 von Andrija am 23.03.17 12:39:55Noch ausführlicher:

      http://uk.advfn.com/stock-market/london/fih-group-FIH/share-…

      23/03/2017 9:00am
      UK Regulatory (RNS & others)

      Fih Group (LSE:FIH)
      Intraday Stock Chart
      Today : Thursday 23 March 2017

      Click Here for more Fih Group Charts.
      TIDMFIH

      RNS Number : 3005A

      Dolphin Fund Ltd.

      23 March 2017

      23 March 2017

      NOT FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN, INTO, OR FROM ANY JURISDICTION WHERE TO DO SO WOULD CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF THE RELEVANT LAWS OF THAT JURISDICTION.

      THIS IS AN ANNOUNCEMENT FALLING UNDER RULE 2.4 OF THE CITY CODE ON TAKEOVERS AND MERGERS (THE "CODE") AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ANNOUNCEMENT OF A FIRM INTENTION TO MAKE AN OFFER UNDER RULE 2.7 OF THE CODE. THERE CAN BE NO CERTAINTY THAT ANY FIRM OFFER WILL BE MADE.

      Dolphin Fund Ltd ("Dolphin" or the "Company")

      Possible offer for FIH Group plc ("FIH")

      Dolphin notes the recent announcements by Staunton Holdings Limited ("Staunton") and the independent directors of FIH ("Independent Directors"). Dolphin notes the very low level of FIH shareholder acceptances of the offer by Staunton, save for that received from its associated shareholder, Blackfish Capital Alpha Fund SPC ("Blackfish").

      Dolphin reiterates its desire to enter into a constructive dialogue with FIH with a view to making an offer at a significant premium to the current offer by Staunton of 300 pence in due course depending on the outcome of those discussions.

      Dolphin's constructive approach is not new to FIH. The Company has been a shareholder of FIH for almost a decade, which has been publicly disclosed both to the London Stock Exchange and in FIH Annual Reports. Senior executives of both companies have been in communication during this period, discussing business developments of FIH. FIH has never expressed any concern regarding Dolphin's involvement in FIH and Dolphin's support of FIH has been constant throughout this period despite FIH's poor share performance.

      For this reason, reading the Independent Directors' unfortunate response, which states that Dolphin's request for information "seriously threatens to undermine the Falkland Islands Company business and the interests of its employees", not only comes as a surprise to Dolphin but also appears to be an attempt by the Independent Directors (Messrs. John Foster and Jeremy Blade) to avoid their fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of FIH and its shareholders as a whole. (Na, da scheint ja schon der Hinweis auf eine Klagedrohung durch!) The very poor level of FIH shareholder acceptances of Staunton's offer it is a clear indication of the lack of shareholder enthusiasm for this offer.

      Dolphin has sought information from FIH under Rule 21.3 of the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the "Code") to help with its evaluation of the FIH businesses. However the Independent Directors of FIH have stated that they are not required to provide this information for technical reasons under the Code. Furthermore FIH's advisers informed Dolphin's advisers that no information has been passed to Staunton or its associates (Blackfish, Mr Edmund Rowland and Albany Treasury Limited etc.). The Independent Directors have also made certain assumptions relating to FIC and Dolphin's intentions, which are based on conjecture. Dolphin can only assume that these scaremongering statements are intended to prevent a higher offer being put before FIH shareholders. (Auf diese Punkte werden die die wohl bei einer Klage festnageln:cool:, ggf wird damit sogar eine Rückabwicklung der Andienung von Aktien an Staunton möglich?! Dass Rowland keine weiteren Informationen braucht wenn sein Sohn CEO ist, ist eh klar.)

      Dolphin's intentions regarding FIH and its businesses are purely commercial and Dolphin has no intention to disrupt the status quo in the Falkland Islands. Dolphin and its affiliates (the "Group") have decades of successful expertise in the real estate, hospitality, retail, agriculture, tourism and transportation sectors, which experience Dolphin believes will help FIH's businesses. Furthermore, the Group owns businesses in a wide variety of countries including Argentina, Brazil, the USA, Israel, India and the UK, being a worldwide enterprise with significant resources and commercial experience. Dolphin is committed to building mutual trust with the Falkland Islands Government and its local population by expanding FIH's existing enterprises on the islands, creating new jobs, attracting new capital and further investment into the Falkland Islands economy, while complying with all relevant regulation and building a long-term relationship with the local community. Dolphin intends to maintain a British management in FIH, should an offer be made by Dolphin.

      Dolphin urges FIH shareholders not to take any action with regard to the offer by Staunton for the time being while Dolphin seeks further information from FIH and assesses the level at which it is prepared to make an offer for the Company. It also would point out to accepting FIH shareholders that once the 42(nd) day of the Staunton offer period has expired, being 6 April 2017, they can withdraw those acceptances.

      Further announcements will be made, as appropriate.

      ENQUIRIES:


      Consultores VC Uruguay Tel: + 598 2518 2218
      (investment manager for
      Dolphin Fund Limited)
      Olga Stirling


      Arden Partners plc Tel: + 44 (0) 20 7614
      (Financial adviser to 5900
      Dolphin)
      Chris Hardie
      Ciaran Walsh
      • 1
      • 9
      • 102
       DurchsuchenBeitrag schreiben


      Öl um Falkland >Zukunftsinvestition? FIH PLC ehemals Falkland Islands Holding