SUNWIN - let`s go sweet....jetzt erst recht!!!! (Seite 6425)
eröffnet am 01.04.07 13:45:28 von
neuester Beitrag 05.04.24 20:37:53 von
neuester Beitrag 05.04.24 20:37:53 von
Beiträge: 66.307
ID: 1.122.196
ID: 1.122.196
Aufrufe heute: 6.857
Gesamt: 22.696.444
Gesamt: 22.696.444
Aktive User: 0
ISIN: US86803D1090 · WKN: A1JXDL
0,0130
EUR
+8,33 %
+0,0010 EUR
Letzter Kurs 22.07.22 Stuttgart
Werte aus der Branche Nahrungsmittel
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 5,3354 | +165,44 | |
| 73,80 | +16,05 | |
| 6,520 | +12,83 | |
| 3,0500 | +11,72 | |
| 3.932,00 | +10,76 |
| Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % |
|---|---|---|
| 5,0000 | -27,54 | |
| 4,9800 | -28,65 | |
| 42,10 | -34,74 | |
| 30,00 | -61,54 | |
| 2,8000 | -70,21 |
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Feedback
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 29.319.723 von SeaCloud5 am 15.05.07 09:46:58Kennt von Euch jemand Splenda??
Ja. In den USA und GB findest Du das in jedem Supermarkt und Cafe/Restaurant.
Ich hatte mich anfangs auch irre führen lassen durch den Slogan von Splenda.
Der Prozess zeigt, wie heiß umkämpft dieser Markt ist und über welches Potential er verfügt. Die außergerichtliche Einigung zeigt aber auch, daß man versucht die Wogen zu glätten. Würden diese Streitigkeiten weiter in den Fokus der Öffentlichkeit rücken, würde das beiden Unternehmen schaden und den Anbietern von natürlichen Süßstoffen in die Karten spielen, da die Gesellschaft schneller und intensiver auf die gesundheitsschädlichen Auswirkungen künstlicher Süßstoffe aufmerksam machen würde.
Nur wird diese Entwicklung im Zuge des veränderten Umwelt- und Gesundheitsbewußtseins unserer Gesellschaft eh nicht mehr aufzuhalten sein. Es ist nur noch eine Frage der Zeit, bis sich natürliche Süßstoffe durchsetzen.
Auf steigende Kurse and let's GO SWEET.
Ja. In den USA und GB findest Du das in jedem Supermarkt und Cafe/Restaurant.
Ich hatte mich anfangs auch irre führen lassen durch den Slogan von Splenda.
Der Prozess zeigt, wie heiß umkämpft dieser Markt ist und über welches Potential er verfügt. Die außergerichtliche Einigung zeigt aber auch, daß man versucht die Wogen zu glätten. Würden diese Streitigkeiten weiter in den Fokus der Öffentlichkeit rücken, würde das beiden Unternehmen schaden und den Anbietern von natürlichen Süßstoffen in die Karten spielen, da die Gesellschaft schneller und intensiver auf die gesundheitsschädlichen Auswirkungen künstlicher Süßstoffe aufmerksam machen würde.
Nur wird diese Entwicklung im Zuge des veränderten Umwelt- und Gesundheitsbewußtseins unserer Gesellschaft eh nicht mehr aufzuhalten sein. Es ist nur noch eine Frage der Zeit, bis sich natürliche Süßstoffe durchsetzen.
Auf steigende Kurse and let's GO SWEET.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 29.317.937 von Firsteven am 15.05.07 06:30:52The active ingredient in Splenda starts as pure cane sugar but is chemically altered to create a compound that contains no calories, according to McNeil. The final product contains no sugar
Herstellung [Bearbeiten]Die Herstellung der Trichlorsaccharose Sucralose erfolgt durch selektive Chlorierung von Saccharose, wobei drei Hydroxyl-Gruppen gegen drei Chlor-Atome ausgetauscht werden.
Eigenschaften [Bearbeiten]Sucralose hat – anders als Saccharin – keinen bitteren Nachgeschmack. Das Süßeprofil ist anders als das des Zuckers. Die Süße setzt spät ein und hält sehr lange an, auch nach dem Herunterschlucken ist noch lange ein süßer Nachgeschmack feststellbar. Es hat keine Kalorien, verursacht kein Karies, ist außergewöhnlich hitzestabil und hat eine sehr gute Löslichkeit und Mischbarkeit mit anderen Nahrungsmittelkomponenten.
Sucralose kann – wie Zucker – in Lösungen mit Wasser reagieren, jedoch nur über einen längeren Zeitraum bei sehr hohen Säuregraden und Temperaturen.
Sucralose zeigt eine appetitanregende Wirkung, die nicht sinnvoll im Einsatz für Diäten wäre.
Kennt von Euch jemand Splenda??
Herstellung [Bearbeiten]Die Herstellung der Trichlorsaccharose Sucralose erfolgt durch selektive Chlorierung von Saccharose, wobei drei Hydroxyl-Gruppen gegen drei Chlor-Atome ausgetauscht werden.
Eigenschaften [Bearbeiten]Sucralose hat – anders als Saccharin – keinen bitteren Nachgeschmack. Das Süßeprofil ist anders als das des Zuckers. Die Süße setzt spät ein und hält sehr lange an, auch nach dem Herunterschlucken ist noch lange ein süßer Nachgeschmack feststellbar. Es hat keine Kalorien, verursacht kein Karies, ist außergewöhnlich hitzestabil und hat eine sehr gute Löslichkeit und Mischbarkeit mit anderen Nahrungsmittelkomponenten.
Sucralose kann – wie Zucker – in Lösungen mit Wasser reagieren, jedoch nur über einen längeren Zeitraum bei sehr hohen Säuregraden und Temperaturen.
Sucralose zeigt eine appetitanregende Wirkung, die nicht sinnvoll im Einsatz für Diäten wäre.
Kennt von Euch jemand Splenda??
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 29.305.397 von sunwin1 am 14.05.07 18:10:49Danke sunwin1, aber ich hatte mich beherrscht, es nicht zu beantworten
Guten Morgen zusammen... 
... schön, noch ein paar "alte" Nicks hier zu lesen...
... schön, noch ein paar "alte" Nicks hier zu lesen...
China Venture Forum: China Stock to Watch for Monday, May 14: SUWN Receives Purchase Order for OnlySweet for Utilization in the Food Services Industry
5/14/2007
Shanghai, China, May 14, 2007 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX News Network) --
China Venture Forum, an equity research newsletter of micro- and small-cap China Stocks, announced China Stock to Watch for Monday, May 14, 2007 include Sunwin International Neutraceuticals, Inc. (OTCBB: SUWN).
Sunwin Stevia International Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sunwin International Neutraceuticals, Inc (OTC BB: SUWN), announced weeks ago that it has received an order for OnlySweet that will be used in the food service industry. The Company has also received several additional purchase orders from regional grocery chains to carry the OnlySweet product line beginning in June 2007, bringing the total number of locations where OnlySweet will be sold in excess of 2,000 stores nationwide.
The makers of Splenda and Equal on Friday settled a lawsuit over Splenda's disputed advertising slogan -- "Made from sugar so it tastes like sugar."
The settlement came after the jury announced that it had reached a verdict.
Merisant Co., which makes Equal, accused Splenda of confusing consumers into thinking its product was healthier and more natural than other artificial sweeteners. Splenda's marketer, McNeil Nutritionals, countered that it simply has a better product backed by superior advertising.
A McNeil spokeswoman in the courtroom said the amount of the settlement wouldn't be announced. The two sides planned to issue a joint statement later Friday.
Chicago-based Merisant was seeking more than $200 million from McNeil -- at least $183 million for unfair profits since 2003 and compensation for at least $25 million in lost sales.
The active ingredient in Splenda starts as pure cane sugar but is chemically altered to create a compound that contains no calories, according to McNeil. The final product contains no sugar.
The one-month trial focused mostly on Splenda's advertising slogan, but it ended in a settlement after the jury said it had reached a verdict Friday afternoon.
Settlement talks began after jurors asked the judge for a calculator and a white board, an indication that they were computing damages to be awarded to Merisant. Lawyers rushed to the courtroom to try to delay the jury's announcement and then huddled in a courthouse meeting room.
McNeil's own consultants said its slogan confused potential customers, some of whom thought that Splenda was sugar without the calories, Merisant's attorneys said. McNeil rejected a plan to add the phrase "does not contain sugar" to the front of Splenda's yellow box, which might have cleared up the confusion, Merisant said.
Because the manufacturing of Splenda begins with sugar, McNeil can accurately claim that Splenda is "made from" sugar, according to its attorneys.
Splenda is used in more than 4,000 food and drink products and is included in recipes at numerous chain restaurants.
It had 60 percent of the consumer artificial sweetener market last year, according to the research firm Information Resources Inc. Equal, which comes in blue packets and is made with aspartame, and Sweet'N Low, in pink packets and made with saccharin, each held about 14 percent of the consumer market.
McNeil is a unit of Johnson & Johnson based in suburban Philadelphia and markets Splenda for its manufacturer, London-based Tate & Lyle PLC. It is also defending its Splenda advertising claims in a separate lawsuit in California filed by a group of U.S. sugar manufacturers.
So which one is the right sweetener for you? OnlySweet is a proprietary product blended with Stevioside (stevia), a natural sweetener, extracted from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant. OnlySweet is distributed through Sunwin Stevia International Corp. and used as a food additive in a wide variety of products, such as beverages, pastries, dairy products, confections and medicinal products in Japan, China, Malaysia, Israel, South Korea, Brazil and other countries. In the United States, OnlySweet is a dietary supplement sold in boxes of 100 and 200 sachets. It has zero calories and does not significantly alter blood sugar levels. OnlySweet is unique because its Stevia only comes directly from Sunwin International Neutraceuticals (OTCBB: SUWN), one of the world's largest stevia manufacturers and distributors, assuring consistency and purity. For more information about OnlySweet, please visit http://www.onlysweet.com.
ABOUT CHINA VENTURE FORUM
China Venture Forum ("CVF") is a research site specializing in Chinese undervalued equities. Viewing China from within, we are the premier publisher of research on Chinese micro-cap (less than $100 million market cap) and small-cap (less than $1 billion market cap) companies listed on the US stock exchanges
To receive our FREE reports as soon as they are released, please subscribe to our list at http://www.chinaventureforum.net. Our services include our daily update and coverage. Additionally we produce comprehensive research reports on these Chinese companies publicly traded on the US stock exchanges.
CVF provides its subscribers with the latest news, press releases, and research reports for all the companies highlighted on the site. CVF utilizes information believed to be reliable herein prepared all material. The information contained herein is not guaranteed by CVF to be accurate, and should not be considered to be all-inclusive. The owner, publisher, editor and their associates are not responsible for errors and omissions. They may from time to time have a position in the securities mentioned herein and may increase or decrease such positions without notice. Any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. CVF encourages readers and investors to supplement the information in these reports with independent research and other professional advice. All information on featured companies is provided by the companies profiled, or is available from public sources and CVF makes no representations, warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of the disclosure by the profiled companies or the information contained herein. The companies that are discussed in this opinion have not approved the statements made in this opinion. This opinion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. This material is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities. CVF is not a licensed broker, broker dealer, market maker, investment banker, investment advisor, analyst or underwriter. Please consult a broker before purchasing or selling any securities.
This release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. "Forward-looking statements" describe future expectations, plans, results, or strategies and are generally preceded by words such as "may", "future", "plan" or "planned", "will" or "should", "expected," "anticipates", "draft", "eventually" or "projected". You are cautioned that such statements are subject to a multitude of risks and uncertainties that could cause future circumstances, events, or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, including the risks that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, and other risks identified in a companies' annual report on Form 10-K or 10-KSB and other filings made by such company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investing in small-cap stocks is highly speculative. You should never invest in any stock mentioned in this release unless you can afford to lose your entire investment. You should consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements included herein, and not place undue reliance on such statements. The forward-looking statements in this release are made as of the date hereof and CVF undertakes no obligation to update such statements.
5/14/2007
Shanghai, China, May 14, 2007 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX News Network) --
China Venture Forum, an equity research newsletter of micro- and small-cap China Stocks, announced China Stock to Watch for Monday, May 14, 2007 include Sunwin International Neutraceuticals, Inc. (OTCBB: SUWN).
Sunwin Stevia International Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sunwin International Neutraceuticals, Inc (OTC BB: SUWN), announced weeks ago that it has received an order for OnlySweet that will be used in the food service industry. The Company has also received several additional purchase orders from regional grocery chains to carry the OnlySweet product line beginning in June 2007, bringing the total number of locations where OnlySweet will be sold in excess of 2,000 stores nationwide.
The makers of Splenda and Equal on Friday settled a lawsuit over Splenda's disputed advertising slogan -- "Made from sugar so it tastes like sugar."
The settlement came after the jury announced that it had reached a verdict.
Merisant Co., which makes Equal, accused Splenda of confusing consumers into thinking its product was healthier and more natural than other artificial sweeteners. Splenda's marketer, McNeil Nutritionals, countered that it simply has a better product backed by superior advertising.
A McNeil spokeswoman in the courtroom said the amount of the settlement wouldn't be announced. The two sides planned to issue a joint statement later Friday.
Chicago-based Merisant was seeking more than $200 million from McNeil -- at least $183 million for unfair profits since 2003 and compensation for at least $25 million in lost sales.
The active ingredient in Splenda starts as pure cane sugar but is chemically altered to create a compound that contains no calories, according to McNeil. The final product contains no sugar.
The one-month trial focused mostly on Splenda's advertising slogan, but it ended in a settlement after the jury said it had reached a verdict Friday afternoon.
Settlement talks began after jurors asked the judge for a calculator and a white board, an indication that they were computing damages to be awarded to Merisant. Lawyers rushed to the courtroom to try to delay the jury's announcement and then huddled in a courthouse meeting room.
McNeil's own consultants said its slogan confused potential customers, some of whom thought that Splenda was sugar without the calories, Merisant's attorneys said. McNeil rejected a plan to add the phrase "does not contain sugar" to the front of Splenda's yellow box, which might have cleared up the confusion, Merisant said.
Because the manufacturing of Splenda begins with sugar, McNeil can accurately claim that Splenda is "made from" sugar, according to its attorneys.
Splenda is used in more than 4,000 food and drink products and is included in recipes at numerous chain restaurants.
It had 60 percent of the consumer artificial sweetener market last year, according to the research firm Information Resources Inc. Equal, which comes in blue packets and is made with aspartame, and Sweet'N Low, in pink packets and made with saccharin, each held about 14 percent of the consumer market.
McNeil is a unit of Johnson & Johnson based in suburban Philadelphia and markets Splenda for its manufacturer, London-based Tate & Lyle PLC. It is also defending its Splenda advertising claims in a separate lawsuit in California filed by a group of U.S. sugar manufacturers.
So which one is the right sweetener for you? OnlySweet is a proprietary product blended with Stevioside (stevia), a natural sweetener, extracted from the leaves of the Stevia rebaudiana plant. OnlySweet is distributed through Sunwin Stevia International Corp. and used as a food additive in a wide variety of products, such as beverages, pastries, dairy products, confections and medicinal products in Japan, China, Malaysia, Israel, South Korea, Brazil and other countries. In the United States, OnlySweet is a dietary supplement sold in boxes of 100 and 200 sachets. It has zero calories and does not significantly alter blood sugar levels. OnlySweet is unique because its Stevia only comes directly from Sunwin International Neutraceuticals (OTCBB: SUWN), one of the world's largest stevia manufacturers and distributors, assuring consistency and purity. For more information about OnlySweet, please visit http://www.onlysweet.com.
ABOUT CHINA VENTURE FORUM
China Venture Forum ("CVF") is a research site specializing in Chinese undervalued equities. Viewing China from within, we are the premier publisher of research on Chinese micro-cap (less than $100 million market cap) and small-cap (less than $1 billion market cap) companies listed on the US stock exchanges
To receive our FREE reports as soon as they are released, please subscribe to our list at http://www.chinaventureforum.net. Our services include our daily update and coverage. Additionally we produce comprehensive research reports on these Chinese companies publicly traded on the US stock exchanges.
CVF provides its subscribers with the latest news, press releases, and research reports for all the companies highlighted on the site. CVF utilizes information believed to be reliable herein prepared all material. The information contained herein is not guaranteed by CVF to be accurate, and should not be considered to be all-inclusive. The owner, publisher, editor and their associates are not responsible for errors and omissions. They may from time to time have a position in the securities mentioned herein and may increase or decrease such positions without notice. Any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. CVF encourages readers and investors to supplement the information in these reports with independent research and other professional advice. All information on featured companies is provided by the companies profiled, or is available from public sources and CVF makes no representations, warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of the disclosure by the profiled companies or the information contained herein. The companies that are discussed in this opinion have not approved the statements made in this opinion. This opinion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. This material is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities. CVF is not a licensed broker, broker dealer, market maker, investment banker, investment advisor, analyst or underwriter. Please consult a broker before purchasing or selling any securities.
This release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. "Forward-looking statements" describe future expectations, plans, results, or strategies and are generally preceded by words such as "may", "future", "plan" or "planned", "will" or "should", "expected," "anticipates", "draft", "eventually" or "projected". You are cautioned that such statements are subject to a multitude of risks and uncertainties that could cause future circumstances, events, or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, including the risks that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, and other risks identified in a companies' annual report on Form 10-K or 10-KSB and other filings made by such company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investing in small-cap stocks is highly speculative. You should never invest in any stock mentioned in this release unless you can afford to lose your entire investment. You should consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements included herein, and not place undue reliance on such statements. The forward-looking statements in this release are made as of the date hereof and CVF undertakes no obligation to update such statements.
Trading Spotlight
Was ich noch sagen wollte: Habe von NuNaturals die Stevialieferung bekommen und das Zeug ist absolut klasse. Ist sehr einfach in der Anwendung und kommt sehr nahe an den Zuckergeschmack. Man vermisst den Zucker eigentlich nicht mehr. OnlySweet dürfte genauso schmecken. Dieses Zeug hat wirklich Potenzial. Das Problem dürfte nur sein, dass es viele Anbieter geben wird auf den westlichen Märkten, was die Margen dann erheblich beeinträchtigen wird. Das Produkt ist ja sehr leicht herzustellen. Aber wer zuerst kommt, mahlt zuerst und das wird noch sehr interessant werden. Bin schon gespannt auf die nächsten Quartalszahlen.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 29.305.781 von MaxGoldig am 14.05.07 18:29:46Die Luft ist raus. Jetzt geht`s wahrscheinlich ersteinmal wieder seitwärts oder leicht Richtung Süden, dort wo die Sonne scheint.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 29.298.084 von SeaCloud5 am 14.05.07 10:51:12Sehe ich auch so. Totalklatsche
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 29.299.669 von entombed1966 am 14.05.07 12:39:17ich denke mal, dass es seacloud um die übertreibung geht. aber das darfst Du gerne selbst beantworten ich finde es aber auch zum k*tzen, dass man es "kindesmisshandlung" nennt wenn man mit seinen kindern pommes mit majo essen geht. noch mehr übertreibung geht kaum.
wir halten uns jetzt seit 5 handelstagen auf gleichem level...das ist nach so einem starken anstieg wirklich positiv zu werten.
ich finde es aber auch zum k*tzen, dass man es "kindesmisshandlung" nennt wenn man mit seinen kindern pommes mit majo essen geht. noch mehr übertreibung geht kaum.wir halten uns jetzt seit 5 handelstagen auf gleichem level...das ist nach so einem starken anstieg wirklich positiv zu werten.
Durchsuchen
SUNWIN - let`s go sweet....jetzt erst recht!!!!
