Lidl - 500 Beiträge pro Seite
eröffnet am 10.04.08 20:21:58 von
neuester Beitrag 11.04.08 14:14:56 von
neuester Beitrag 11.04.08 14:14:56 von
Beiträge: 11
ID: 1.140.312
ID: 1.140.312
Aufrufe heute: 0
Gesamt: 9.695
Gesamt: 9.695
Aktive User: 0
Top-Diskussionen
Titel | letzter Beitrag | Aufrufe |
---|---|---|
gestern 21:55 | 416 | |
gestern 23:58 | 273 | |
15.05.11, 11:34 | 225 | |
20.04.24, 12:11 | 216 | |
gestern 23:09 | 183 | |
heute 00:01 | 173 | |
heute 01:46 | 169 | |
heute 00:49 | 138 |
Meistdiskutierte Wertpapiere
Platz | vorher | Wertpapier | Kurs | Perf. % | Anzahl | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 1. | 18.075,00 | +0,33 | 240 | |||
2. | 2. | 1,3800 | -1,43 | 98 | |||
3. | 3. | 0,1890 | -2,58 | 81 | |||
4. | 4. | 170,18 | +4,97 | 78 | |||
5. | 5. | 9,3325 | -3,69 | 75 | |||
6. | 6. | 7,0010 | +4,17 | 53 | |||
7. | 7. | 22,240 | -3,22 | 41 | |||
8. | 8. | 0,0160 | -24,17 | 38 |
Aus einer heutigen Stellungnahme dieses Unternehmens:
"Einige Kunden haben geschrieben, sie gehen nicht mehr einkaufen und das haben wir auch gemerkt." Dies sei jedoch "der falsche Weg", weil die Kunden damit nicht das Unternehmen, sondern die Mitarbeiter bestraften.
So etwas ist an Ignoranz kaum zu überbieten.
Das Management macht nachweislich Fehler, die Kunden reagieren und jetzt sollen laut LIDL-Verbrecherbande die Mitarbeiter(!) geopfert werden!?
:O
"Einige Kunden haben geschrieben, sie gehen nicht mehr einkaufen und das haben wir auch gemerkt." Dies sei jedoch "der falsche Weg", weil die Kunden damit nicht das Unternehmen, sondern die Mitarbeiter bestraften.
So etwas ist an Ignoranz kaum zu überbieten.
Das Management macht nachweislich Fehler, die Kunden reagieren und jetzt sollen laut LIDL-Verbrecherbande die Mitarbeiter(!) geopfert werden!?
:O
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.860.823 von ecevit am 10.04.08 20:21:58Kann man jetzt eigentlich günstig gebrauchte Kameras bei Lidl kaufen?
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.860.881 von MrDodge am 10.04.08 20:28:26Bestimmt, plus PCs mit Trojanern.
Vor allem können die Angestellten jetzt erst recht klauen!
Die paar Kunden die weg bleiben kann Lidl verkraften, aber der Mitarbeiterdiebstahl wird explodieren!
Die paar Kunden die weg bleiben kann Lidl verkraften, aber der Mitarbeiterdiebstahl wird explodieren!
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.861.148 von ThorVestor am 10.04.08 20:53:58Was willst denn bei Lidl klauen ?
Ist doch schön, wenn der Ehemann mit dem Kombi vorbei kommt und man kein Geld mehr für Lebenmittel ausgeben muss.
Dann kann man das Geld, dass man durch Kassenmanipulation klaut ganz für den Hausbau oder Urlaub ausgeben.
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.861.640 von ThorVestor am 10.04.08 21:49:22Ist der Wirt ein Schelm, traut er seinen Gästen nicht.
Träumst Du eigentlich auch nachts noch von klauenden und betrügenden Mitarbeitern, die darüberhinaus auch noch Urlaub machen wollen?
Du kannst einem leid tun, aber noch viel mehr ist Dein Umfeld (so vorhanden) zu bedauern..
Träumst Du eigentlich auch nachts noch von klauenden und betrügenden Mitarbeitern, die darüberhinaus auch noch Urlaub machen wollen?
Du kannst einem leid tun, aber noch viel mehr ist Dein Umfeld (so vorhanden) zu bedauern..
Home » News » Features
APRIL 9, 2008
Struggling local venture seeks out solution to saturated market
That's an MRAP
BY GREG HAMBRICK
Local vehicle manufacturer Force Protection hopes the new Cheetah model (above) will be a money-maker after losing a string of contracts for older models
The local festivities for last summer's Democratic Presidential Debate in Charleston included one somewhat unusual campaign stop. Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) stood at Brittlebank Park, praising the local manufacturers of mine resistant vehicles, often referred to as MRAPs. He kicked the tires and then awkwardly climbed on a few for photos. It was all an effort to draw attention to the industry, but Biden's early exit from the presidential race was likely just one sign that the horsepower behind Charleston's burgeoning military vehicle market, led by Force Protection, was losing juice. As for the final straw, observers can take their pick from the company's recent calamities — including accounting errors, class-action lawsuits, stock cave-ins, and contract losses.
The company refuses to comment about its next move while things settle, but officials told investors last month that the firm had identified a path out of the turmoil that relies heavily on moving away from the vehicle that's been its bread and butter for the past five years.
Of those straws, the largest was likely a Department of Defense order for more than 2,200 MRAPs last month that went to Force Protection's competitors, along with an official announcement that the Marines, who'd been most enamored by Force Protection's Cougar model, had bought all they needed.
Military orders placed in December provided Force Protection only 358 of the more than 3,000 requested. In a Congressional hearing on the Marine Corps' budget on Feb. 27, military officials were only timidly encouraging about the company's prospects, after having been prompted by Congressman Joe Wilson, a Lexington Republican.
"We have probably made our last procurement for U.S. forces of the Cougar vehicle," said Brigadier General Michael Brogan. The Corps had all the Cougars it needed and could take some excess from the Army if necessary. The Navy was also full, Brogan said. "They have served us well. We've been very fortunate to have Force Protection as one of our prime manufacturers."
But the Corps was a lot less conciliatory about the need for MRAPs late last year. Commandant Gen. James Conway told a crowd at the Center for a New American Security in October that the weighty vehicles may not be a long-term necessity for the quick-moving Marines.
"Those vehicles weigh 40,000 pounds, each in the larger category," he said before moving on to their potential future use. "Wrap them in shrink wrap and put them in asphalt somewhere is about the best thing that we can describe at this point. And as expensive as they are, that is probably not a good use of the taxpayer's money."
U.S. Military forces say Force Protection's former big draw, The Couger (above), has been a strong player in the field, but they've got all they need
The local festivities for last summer's Democratic Presidential Debate in Charleston included one somewhat unusual campaign stop. Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) stood at Brittlebank Park, praising the local manufacturers of mine resistant vehicles, often referred to as MRAPs. He kicked the tires and then awkwardly climbed on a few for photos. It was all an effort to draw attention to the industry, but Biden's early exit from the presidential race was likely just one sign that the horsepower behind Charleston's burgeoning military vehicle market, led by Force Protection, was losing juice. As for the final straw, observers can take their pick from the company's recent calamities — including accounting errors, class-action lawsuits, stock cave-ins, and contract losses.
The company refuses to comment about its next move while things settle, but officials told investors last month that the firm had identified a path out of the turmoil that relies heavily on moving away from the vehicle that's been its bread and butter for the past five years.
Of those straws, the largest was likely a Department of Defense order for more than 2,200 MRAPs last month that went to Force Protection's competitors, along with an official announcement that the Marines, who'd been most enamored by Force Protection's Cougar model, had bought all they needed.
Military orders placed in December provided Force Protection only 358 of the more than 3,000 requested. In a Congressional hearing on the Marine Corps' budget on Feb. 27, military officials were only timidly encouraging about the company's prospects, after having been prompted by Congressman Joe Wilson, a Lexington Republican.
"We have probably made our last procurement for U.S. forces of the Cougar vehicle," said Brigadier General Michael Brogan. The Corps had all the Cougars it needed and could take some excess from the Army if necessary. The Navy was also full, Brogan said. "They have served us well. We've been very fortunate to have Force Protection as one of our prime manufacturers."
But the Corps was a lot less conciliatory about the need for MRAPs late last year. Commandant Gen. James Conway told a crowd at the Center for a New American Security in October that the weighty vehicles may not be a long-term necessity for the quick-moving Marines.
"Those vehicles weigh 40,000 pounds, each in the larger category," he said before moving on to their potential future use. "Wrap them in shrink wrap and put them in asphalt somewhere is about the best thing that we can describe at this point. And as expensive as they are, that is probably not a good use of the taxpayer's money."
APRIL 9, 2008
Struggling local venture seeks out solution to saturated market
That's an MRAP
BY GREG HAMBRICK
Local vehicle manufacturer Force Protection hopes the new Cheetah model (above) will be a money-maker after losing a string of contracts for older models
The local festivities for last summer's Democratic Presidential Debate in Charleston included one somewhat unusual campaign stop. Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) stood at Brittlebank Park, praising the local manufacturers of mine resistant vehicles, often referred to as MRAPs. He kicked the tires and then awkwardly climbed on a few for photos. It was all an effort to draw attention to the industry, but Biden's early exit from the presidential race was likely just one sign that the horsepower behind Charleston's burgeoning military vehicle market, led by Force Protection, was losing juice. As for the final straw, observers can take their pick from the company's recent calamities — including accounting errors, class-action lawsuits, stock cave-ins, and contract losses.
The company refuses to comment about its next move while things settle, but officials told investors last month that the firm had identified a path out of the turmoil that relies heavily on moving away from the vehicle that's been its bread and butter for the past five years.
Of those straws, the largest was likely a Department of Defense order for more than 2,200 MRAPs last month that went to Force Protection's competitors, along with an official announcement that the Marines, who'd been most enamored by Force Protection's Cougar model, had bought all they needed.
Military orders placed in December provided Force Protection only 358 of the more than 3,000 requested. In a Congressional hearing on the Marine Corps' budget on Feb. 27, military officials were only timidly encouraging about the company's prospects, after having been prompted by Congressman Joe Wilson, a Lexington Republican.
"We have probably made our last procurement for U.S. forces of the Cougar vehicle," said Brigadier General Michael Brogan. The Corps had all the Cougars it needed and could take some excess from the Army if necessary. The Navy was also full, Brogan said. "They have served us well. We've been very fortunate to have Force Protection as one of our prime manufacturers."
But the Corps was a lot less conciliatory about the need for MRAPs late last year. Commandant Gen. James Conway told a crowd at the Center for a New American Security in October that the weighty vehicles may not be a long-term necessity for the quick-moving Marines.
"Those vehicles weigh 40,000 pounds, each in the larger category," he said before moving on to their potential future use. "Wrap them in shrink wrap and put them in asphalt somewhere is about the best thing that we can describe at this point. And as expensive as they are, that is probably not a good use of the taxpayer's money."
U.S. Military forces say Force Protection's former big draw, The Couger (above), has been a strong player in the field, but they've got all they need
The local festivities for last summer's Democratic Presidential Debate in Charleston included one somewhat unusual campaign stop. Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) stood at Brittlebank Park, praising the local manufacturers of mine resistant vehicles, often referred to as MRAPs. He kicked the tires and then awkwardly climbed on a few for photos. It was all an effort to draw attention to the industry, but Biden's early exit from the presidential race was likely just one sign that the horsepower behind Charleston's burgeoning military vehicle market, led by Force Protection, was losing juice. As for the final straw, observers can take their pick from the company's recent calamities — including accounting errors, class-action lawsuits, stock cave-ins, and contract losses.
The company refuses to comment about its next move while things settle, but officials told investors last month that the firm had identified a path out of the turmoil that relies heavily on moving away from the vehicle that's been its bread and butter for the past five years.
Of those straws, the largest was likely a Department of Defense order for more than 2,200 MRAPs last month that went to Force Protection's competitors, along with an official announcement that the Marines, who'd been most enamored by Force Protection's Cougar model, had bought all they needed.
Military orders placed in December provided Force Protection only 358 of the more than 3,000 requested. In a Congressional hearing on the Marine Corps' budget on Feb. 27, military officials were only timidly encouraging about the company's prospects, after having been prompted by Congressman Joe Wilson, a Lexington Republican.
"We have probably made our last procurement for U.S. forces of the Cougar vehicle," said Brigadier General Michael Brogan. The Corps had all the Cougars it needed and could take some excess from the Army if necessary. The Navy was also full, Brogan said. "They have served us well. We've been very fortunate to have Force Protection as one of our prime manufacturers."
But the Corps was a lot less conciliatory about the need for MRAPs late last year. Commandant Gen. James Conway told a crowd at the Center for a New American Security in October that the weighty vehicles may not be a long-term necessity for the quick-moving Marines.
"Those vehicles weigh 40,000 pounds, each in the larger category," he said before moving on to their potential future use. "Wrap them in shrink wrap and put them in asphalt somewhere is about the best thing that we can describe at this point. And as expensive as they are, that is probably not a good use of the taxpayer's money."
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.861.305 von DScully am 10.04.08 21:13:52Den San Pelligrino,
oder die diversen Milchprodukte, die als Eigenmarke getarnt sind un din Wirklichkeit aber aus namhaften Häusern stammen
oder die diversen Milchprodukte, die als Eigenmarke getarnt sind un din Wirklichkeit aber aus namhaften Häusern stammen
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.860.823 von ecevit am 10.04.08 20:21:58das ist wirklich ein ding, unglaublich!!!!
Antwort auf Beitrag Nr.: 33.860.823 von ecevit am 10.04.08 20:21:58jo, jetzt laufen die Gutgläubigen wieder innen "SS"-Laden ALDI. Spezielles Futter für unsere besten Leute. Kotzmetaphern im Kuchenregal...würg.
Seid bloß vorsichtig.
Seid bloß vorsichtig.
Beitrag zu dieser Diskussion schreiben
Zu dieser Diskussion können keine Beiträge mehr verfasst werden, da der letzte Beitrag vor mehr als zwei Jahren verfasst wurde und die Diskussion daraufhin archiviert wurde.
Bitte wenden Sie sich an feedback@wallstreet-online.de und erfragen Sie die Reaktivierung der Diskussion oder starten Sie eine neue Diskussion.
Meistdiskutiert
Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
---|---|---|
240 | ||
98 | ||
81 | ||
78 | ||
75 | ||
53 | ||
41 | ||
38 | ||
36 | ||
33 |
Wertpapier | Beiträge | |
---|---|---|
32 | ||
30 | ||
28 | ||
24 | ||
24 | ||
24 | ||
23 | ||
20 | ||
20 | ||
19 |